Vilnius NATO summit will likely be a flop

Any decision on NATO membership is between the 31 Allies and aspirant country. And so, in this case, when it comes to Ukraine, we have been discussing with our NATO Allies and Ukraine how we can collectively support Ukraine’s aspiration for Euro-Atlantic integration.

Ukraine would have to make reforms to meet the same standards as any NATO country before they join. President Biden thinks that Ukraine can do that.

– Karine Jean-Pierre, White House press secretary

​US President Joe Biden will spend three days in Europe at the NATO Summit in Vilnius scheduled for 11 and 12 July. The main topic will be Ukraine and where to go from here.

Ukraine is pushing for either immediate NATO membership or actionable security guarantees from NATO. But Ukraine’s position is undermined by the failure of the counteroffensive against Russia, and the failure of its attempts – via sabotage, assassination and lethal drones aimed at the Kremlin – to destabilize the Putin government. Now Ukraine is saying it needs NATO air power to be able to win its war.

It will be very hard to get a NATO consensus on the road ahead, no matter how much arm twisting Washington uses on its European partners.

Europe is already in a recession thanks to the Covid catastrophe, the sanctions on Russian energy and the huge unemployment levels, which impact recent immigrants. The result of all that is social unrest across Europe. France is already experiencing a serious revolt, and while the French situation has eased in the past few days, it will come back.

Meanwhile, the German government coalition​ is steadily losing popular support and the AfD, Germany’s right-wing party, is now the second most popular party in the country. Olaf Scholz and his coalition partners don’t know what to do: they may try banning AfD as a last ditch effort. Italy is also far from out of the mess.

The country has a conservative leadership but is being battered by unprecedented waves of immigrants coming from the Middle East. 

The triumphs and question marks from this week's NATO summit - Atlantic Council
Biden at the 2022 NATO Summit. Photo: Screengrab / Twitter

Europe is out of money and out of bullets. It is not in a mood to give a blank check to Ukraine or risk a bigger war that might spread into Europe. President Biden will have a hard time trying to squeeze more from the Europeans.

Biden knows that he cannot unilaterally use US forces, especially airpower, without airbases and supply centers in Europe. Right now, Washington has a free hand because US warplanes are not bombing Russian positions in Ukraine. Bombing them, however, would force a strong European reaction and shatter NATO.

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky has been pressuring Washington for advanced warplanes, saying airpower would make it possible for Ukraine to win. But the only practical way forward with that over the next year is to operate from bases outside of Ukraine using US and possibly other NATO aircraft.

This would certainly mean war in Europe and the currently ruling governments in Europe either would have to say no or face being removed by force. It is, therefore, an unlikely, if highly dangerous, scenario.

​Washington has already signaled that it has been unable to convince its partners about Ukrainian NATO membership. It is likely that behind the scenes Washington is trying to craft some sort of security guarantee for Ukraine, but any meaningful guarantee is probably a bridge too far.

Russia is also restive after the Yevgeny Prigozhin-led coup attempt. Putin wants a military victory soon, as does the Russian army, which was badly stressed by the Prigozhin accusations.

Holding the line against a Ukrainian counteroffensive is not really a victory for the Russians since their image remains tarnished at home. It is reasonable to expect, therefore, that once the Ukrainian losses mount up high enough in the coming weeks, the Russian army will make dramatic offensive moves against Ukraine.

The big unknown is what the Russian army will do: Will it launch a big attack on Kiev, Kharkiv or Odesa? If, after Vilnius, Moscow sees Zelensky without any expectation of NATO coming to save him, it will exploit the situation very quickly.

Part of the Western foundation for Ukraine’s offensive was the introduction of modern technology on the battlefield, represented especially by the appearance of the Leopard tank. Unfortunately for NATO, the Leopard tanks have not saved the day for Ukraine. 

So far, between 16 and 20 Leopards have been knocked out on the battlefield along with lots of other NATO-supplied armor, including infantry fighting vehicles such as the US Bradley and mine clearing systems like the Finnish Leopard 2R HMBV and the German Wisent 1.

Polish Leopard tanks arrive in Ukraine. Image: Substack

The Leopard and US Abrams main battle tank form the armor backbone of NATO’s land defense. 

While the US and its allies have superior airpower, they have sparse and inadequate air defenses compared with what Russia can bring forward. This means that a land defense needs to stand up to Russian attack helicopters armed with missiles, lethal drones and air-launched mines in addition to artillery.

The failure of the Leopard in Ukraine represents a huge challenge for NATO and signals that the current NATO “tripwire” strategy may not work. 

Under the tripwire paradigm, the idea is that an initial Russian attack (most likely in the Baltic states because Russian forces are very close to Estonia and Latvia) can be held for some days while the US ships heavy forces into Europe. But if the tripwire is illusory, then NATO is exposed to rapid Russian advances in Europe should an attack be launched.

The bottom line is that NATO’s strategy needs revision or, alternatively, that the Europeans and Russians need to work out a mutually acceptable security arrangement. It is exactly such an arrangement that Russia proposed to NATO in December 2021. It was rejected without discussion.

Now the ammunition cupboard is bare, even in the United States. The Russians are learning how to counter advanced Western systems, a negative development for NATO’s security. It could not be a worse time to risk Europe’s security on the basis of being able to stop a Russian attack.

It may be easy for British politicians to scream they want NATO to fight in Ukraine, but it isn’t London that is likely the first target of Russia’s missiles. Cracks in the alliance are emerging more quickly than anticipated, and Europe’s weak governments are in trouble.

It will be interesting to see how Vilnius plays out. It will certainly be a propagandistic show, but there is a good chance Vilnius will be a flop.

Stephen Bryen is a senior fellow at the Center for Security Policy and the Yorktown Institute. This article was originally published on his Substack, Weapons and Strategy. Asia Times is republishing it with permission.

Continue Reading

China bans some Japanese food imports over Fukushima water release

BEIJING: China’s customs authority on Friday (Jul 7) said it would ban food imports from 10 Japanese prefectures over Tokyo’s plan to release treated nuclear wastewater into the ocean. Japan’s planned, decades-long discharge of accumulated water from the devastated Fukushima nuclear facility has been approved by the International Atomic EnergyContinue Reading

China must rethink its reliance on property sales to see real growth

A woman serves food at a market in ChinaJoyce Liu/BBC

The small eastern city of Zibo in Shandong province is experiencing an outdoor barbecue craze.

People from all over China are coming here to taste its lamb skewers, which have become legendary via social media.

It’s quite a raucous experience and certainly not for the faint-hearted.

The street is packed, you sit on little plastic chairs, drink beer and wrap chunks of meat with spring onion on the local flatbread while karaoke songs pump out in all directions.

On the face of it, these crowds appear to show an economy rebounding strongly from the coronavirus emergency – but according to economists that’s not the case.

Rather, they say, this is an example of people choosing a cheap, tasty, option at a time of great pressure on household incomes.

Karaoke in the small eastern Chinese city of Zibo

Joyce Liu/BBC

A man sitting with his shirt off tells us this is the perfect spot to enjoy a hot summer night with his family, and that this type of fun has a price tag to match the moment.

“This place is great for ordinary people,” he says. “Recently, it’s been hard to make money but still easy to spend it. After three years of Covid, the economy is only slowly recovering.”

University graduates are being hit especially hard by China’s economic doldrums, with youth unemployment hovering at or above 20%.

Some students are feeling nervous about their futures.

“Yes, I’m worried,” says one woman who’ll soon graduate. “There’s a lot of competition. It’s hard to find a job. All my classmates feel the same pressure.”

For those who have jobs, a big reason for their reluctance to spend big is economic security.

They’re concerned about the potential to join the ranks of the unemployed, and their household’s largest single investment is, in many cases, no longer worth what they thought it would be.

The real estate sector is under great stress in China.

An unfinished residential tower block in China

Joyce Liu/BBC

To see this first-hand, we drive a few hours east of Zibo to the outskirts of a much larger city, Qingdao.

Here, a property explosion hasn’t matched real demand from buyers or renters, and the result has been huge housing estates built with very few residents in them.

A woman is selling cold noodles from a portable stand outside her housing complex where she has few neighbours.

A few years ago, her husband bought a flat here after moving to Qingdao to give their child a better start because they heard the schools would be good.

I ask her if she’s worried about the value of her home collapsing.

“Of course I’m worried,” she says. “But what can I do?”

Nearby a couple who are street cleaners have stopped for lunch. They point to the huge estate behind them and say that nobody lives there.

Across the road there is a small forest of concrete towers without paint, without windows and with window frames now looking the worse for wear, having been exposed to the elements.

A woman working as a street cleaner in China

Joyce Liu/BBC

“Construction just stopped there one day last year,” the man says.

According to his wife, the entire suburb is pretty dead. “There’s nothing here. There’s no petrol station. You have to go a long way for fuel. It’s really not convenient to live here,” she says.

There had been hope that this region would take off after it hosted a major political meeting, the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation Summit, and China’s leader Xi Jinping gave it his personal stamp of approval as a place to invest and do business, potentially hosting international expos and the like.

But the factories, start-ups and other companies that would supposedly employ those who bought property here have been few.

According to a local real estate agent, sales volumes have halved in the area in recent years.

“Prices are down because the market is saturated,” she says. “Too many homes were built and it’s hard to sell them.”

We put up a drone to get a bird’s eye view and it looks even worse than at ground level.

Entire new housing estates where work has stopped can be found in all directions. Those that are finished don’t have much sign of life in them.

A construction site in China

Joyce Liu/BBC

What’s more, this supply and demand problem isn’t unique to this area. It isn’t even unique to this city. In province after province across China, evidence pointing to the danger of a property bubble is easy to find.

One reason for rampant real estate speculation in this country has been a lack of other options for investment. But the boom in real estate drove house prices out of the reach of ordinary families in many big cities. The government response was to cap the number of flats any person could buy.

It was a genuine attempt at an egalitarian reform, but pressure is now coming to reverse this. In Qingdao, such measures have already been eased, in an attempt to stimulate its stalled real estate market.

The challenge for Chinese policymakers is to find a way to wean this economy off such a heavy reliance on property sales to generate growth and business confidence.

Economists like Harry Murphy Cruise, from Moody’s Analytics, think China is facing significant problems.

“China’s economy is in desperate need of rebalancing,” he tells the BBC from Australia. “It’s had that massive period of growth over the last two or three decades from big infrastructure building, from a massive uptick in the property market that is actually not a sustainable growth driver going forward.

“Look around the world, developed economies need households as a key driver of economic growth, and that is just not what China has at the moment.”

The Chinese government is considering ways to promote more spending by individuals and by businesses from interest rate cuts to cash handouts.

But the problem is sentiment.

People will feel more secure when there are more jobs. Businesses need to invest to create more jobs, but they are reluctant to do so while customers are so insecure.

As Harry Murphy Cruise puts it: “It’s sort of like the chicken and the egg. You can’t have that uptick in the economy unless you have business spending. They’re not spending until they see that uptick. So, there’s a stalemate that’s really holding back a key portion of the economy.”

Then there’s the chance that all of this will bleed into global trade.

Tourists at a beach in China

Joyce Liu/BBC

China is big. What happens to the world’s second largest economy turns ripples into waves.

Reduced manufacturing here – off the back of weak international demand – has resulted in fewer exports, fewer Chinese-made goods available worldwide and less business activity in Asia’s mega factory. Then the subsequent slower consumption in China means fewer imports of other countries’ products.

The headache for the Chinese government is that it may have to choose whether to go for a short-term stimulus fix, which would delay the rebalancing it will eventually need to face, or whether to absorb more immediate pain and bring on the long-term solution more quickly.

Naturally, there are almost certainly those in Beijing’s upper echelons of power considering some sort of middle path, starting with a milder boost to stabilise the economy, then considering the larger problems at hand.

Because they know that, once negative sentiment sets in, it can be hard to turn around.

Yet if you want to feel optimistic about Qingdao, and about life, you go to the beach. Tourism along its famous coastline does seem to be picking up.

There’s laughter, sandcastle construction and everyone – whether they’re a captain of industry or a truck driver – is enjoying the great embrace of the ocean.

Whether it matches reality or not, here you almost can’t help but feel that, despite everything, the future still has good things in store.

Related Topics

Continue Reading

Chip war may thwart Shanghai plans to build AI hub

The Shanghai government is stepping up its efforts to attract artificial intelligence (AI) talent and investments and improve regulations with the objective of building a world-class AI hub in Pudong.

Top Shanghai officials said in the World AI Conference on Thursday that the largest commercial city in China – which hosts the conference – will gather and groom AI experts to strengthen research and development and promote the use of AI technologies in the advanced manufacturing, urban management and robotics sectors.  

However, Shanghai may face a hardware problem starting later this month, as the Biden administration is set to ban exports of Nvidia’s A800 and H800 AI chips to China soon and also restrict US investment funds from putting money into China’s high-technology sector.

In recent years, China’s Huawei Technologies and Cambricon Technologies have launched their AI chips, which are said to run at speeds of 60-to-70% that of Nvidia’s A100 chip. But the manufacturing of these chips is now done by Taiwan’s TSMC and can be affected by the prospective US curbs.

Supportive measures

On May 25, the Shanghai government in a document called upon private capital to invest in new infrastructure. It said it will extend the implementation period of its policy to provide an interest subsidy of up to 1.5 percentage points to private firms that build AI facilities. 

It said integrated circuit, biomedical and AI sectors are the three most important industries that will build the “Shanghai high ground.”

Currently, Chinese AI firms can still buy A800 and H800 chips, which were introduced by Nvidia last November after the company’s A100 and H100 chips were added to a US export control list last August. It is said that A800’s performance has reached 70% of the A100’s. 

Media reports said last week that the US Commerce Department may also ban the exports of A800 and H800 chips to China soon. The announcement reportedly would be made after US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s four-day Beijing trip ends on July 9.

Ken Hu, rotating chairman of Huawei, said on Thursday that the company has been working hard developing AI chips and industrial applications in recent years. 

Hu said both Huawei’s Ascend AI chips and Kunpeng central processing units (CPUs) have already made some key breakthroughs.

According to a research report published by CITIC Securities on Tuesday, more than 20 Chinese cities have used Ascend chips in their AI facilities while Huawei now has a 79% share in China’s AI computing center market. 

Some media reports said Ascend 910’s performance is about 70% of that of the A100 while Cambricon’s Siyuan 370’s performance is about 60-70% of the A100. Both chips are manufactured in Taiwan using TSMC’s advanced 7nm technology. 

World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, 2023. Photo: CGTN

Made in Taiwan

In May 2019, the US Commerce Department put Huawei and its 70 affiliates on its so-called entity list, on national security grounds. Huawei then started using inventory chips plus self-developed Kirin chips to maintain its smartphone output.

In September 2020, Taiwan’s TSMC stopped producing Kirin chips. In the third quarter of last year, Huawei ran out of its high-end processors and could no longer produce 5G-capable phones.

A Hainan-based columnist published an article last month with the title “Huawei’s Ascend 910 chip is leading in AI computing. Why is it not affected by the US sanctions?”

“Why can TSMC still make Ascend 910 chips but not Kirin 5G ones for Huawei? It’s because they used different technologies,” he says in the article.

He says Ascend 910 used Huawei’s self-developed Da Vinci architecture while Kirin chips used the United Kingdom’s ARM architecture, as well as technologies of the United States’ Cadence and Synopsys.

He adds that TSMC is a Taiwanese foundry, not an American firm, so it enjoys some space to maintain a business relationship with Huawei.  

But a Fujian-based writer says that, even if TSMC can continue to produce AI chips for China, Chinese firms lack the tools to develop more advanced AI chips amid the US curbs and will be left behind by Nvidia.

In May, Nvidia said it will hire 1,000 people and invest up to TWD24.3 billion (US$790 million) in its new AI research center, or AI University, in Taiwan.

World AI Conference

The WAIC has been held in Shanghai annually since 2018. This year’s event attracted a lot more attention as the AI sector has become popular after the Microsoft-backed OpenAI unveiled ChatGPT 3.5, an AI chatbot, last November. Share prices of Nvidia, which has a more than 80% share in the AI chip markets, have grown 196% so far this year.

“There is a tremendous number of very smart and talented people in China,” Tesla founder Elon Musk said in a video shown during the WAIC. “The Chinese can be great at anything if they set their minds to, not only in many sectors of the economy but also in AI. I believe that China will have strong AI capabilities.”

“We will create a good atmosphere for gathering AI talent from all over the world, and accelerate the training of a group of top-notch and urgently-needed talents,” Shanghai party secretary Chen Jining said in opening speech at the WAIC. “We will adhere to open collaboration, build a platform, encourage cooperation, and create an open-source and innovative ecology.” 

“We will actively explore the application practice of general AI technologies in vertical fields such as advanced manufacturing and urban management, and accelerate the development of embodied AI and robotics industries,” Chen said. “The government will strengthen safety supervision and continue to improve the AI governance and application standards.”

Shanghai Mayor Gong Zheng said Shanghai must firmly grasp the wave of new technological revolutions such as AI to upgrade its industries and turn itself into a socialist modern international metropolis with world influence. Gong said the city aims to build a high ground for itself in the AI industry.

Read: Sanctions starting to bite Huawei 4G chips sourcing

Read: Nvidia to turn Taiwan into a world-class AI hub

Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

Pita invites Taylor Swift to Thailand

Aspiring PM tells pop star who cancelled after 2014 coup that country is ‘fully democratic’ now

Taylor Swift performs onstage on the first night of her Eras Tour at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, on March 31. (Photo: AFP)
Taylor Swift performs onstage on the first night of her Eras Tour at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, on March 31. (Photo: AFP)

Taylor Swift is coming to Southeast Asia next year but fans will have to go to Singapore if they want to see her.

But if Pita Limjaroenrat has his way, the American pop megastar will add Thailand to her itinerary. After all, he said, she’s overdue for an appearance here, having cancelled a planned performance in 2014 shortly after the military coup.

The Move Forward party leader and prime ministerial candidate made the pitch on Wednesday evening on Twitter in response to a tweet from Swift about new dates being added to the European leg of her Eras Tour in 2024. He wrote:

“Hey Taylor! Big fan of yours. Btw, Thailand is back on track to be fully democratic after you had to cancel last time due to the coup. The Thai people have spoken via the election and we all look forward to welcoming you to this beautiful nation of ours!

Do come and I’ll be singing Lavender Haze with you!

– Tim”

Swift was scheduled to play a sold-out show in Bangkok on June 9, 2014. But a curfew was in place in the immediate aftermath of the military coup staged by Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha on May 22 of that year.

Organisers BEC-Tero announced on May 27 that the concert was being cancelled “due to recent events”. It did not elaborate.

The singer played some other dates in June of that year but the Bangkok show was never rescheduled.

Swift is scheduled to play six shows in Singapore starting on March 2 next year. Online presales of tickets opened on Wednesday with more than a million people reported to have been in the queue.

Continue Reading

50 consumer complaints filed against e-commerce firm Mdada in span of six months

SINGAPORE: The Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) has received 50 complaints against e-commerce firm Mdada between Jan 1 and Jun 30, 2023.

These were generally from consumers who did not receive their orders within committed delivery timeframes.

Other complaints included incomplete deliveries, delays in receiving refunds for non-deliveries and defective or incorrect products, CASE President Mr Melvin Yong said in a statement on Thursday (Jul 6).

“CASE has written to Mdada to seek resolution for the outstanding complaints,” he added.

Singapore-based Mdada, founded in September 2020 by hairstylist Addy Lee, actor-host Pornsak Prajakwit and actress Michelle Chia, describes itself as the “fastest-growing and largest” livestream commerce multi-channel in Southeast Asia.

It offers a range of beauty and lifestyle products, as well as luxury items.

According to Mr Yong, at least four consumers are yet to receive orders or refunds as of Tuesday, despite Mdada’s commitment to resolve all outstanding orders by June.

“If Mdada is unable to fulfil outstanding orders or if affected consumers no longer wish to proceed with their orders due to the extended delay, they should effect the refund expeditiously,” he said.

“It is unfair for Mdada to hold on to consumers’ monies indefinitely if they are unable to fulfil the orders.”

On Wednesday, the company posted an apology on Facebook, asking customers to bear with them for “a little more” as they settle “teething issues”.

Mdada said it has “progressively paid out refunds for orders that are out of stock or have experienced inordinate delays in shipments”.

Overseas shipments are being expedited to reach customers as soon as they arrive in Singapore, it added.

“Due to manpower shortage, longer processing time is required, impacting our operations,” said the firm, while promising to ensure communication with customers via WhatsApp to be “as painless as possible, with almost immediate” responses and updates.

CNA has contacted Mdada for more information.

Affected customers may approach CASE for assistance via their website or their hotline at 6277-5100.

Continue Reading

Beijing overreaching for exiled HK dissidents

The Hong Kong government has extended its efforts to suppress political dissent overseas, issuing arrest warrants for eight exiled pro-democracy figures and offering bounties of HK$1 million (US$128,000) each.

The targeted pro-democracy figures, who now live in Australia, the US and UK, were selected from a longer list of wanted dissidents. There is a curated feel to their profiles – three ex-legislators, three activists, a unionist and a lawyer – that suggests the list is symbolic, as well as pragmatic.

It is reminiscent of the infamous “Umbrella Nine” trial that capped years of prosecutions after Hong Kong’s 2014 “Umbrella Movement” protests. Three academics, three politicians and three activists were tried and convicted together to send a message to “troublesome” sectors of civil society.

The mugshots of those issued with arrest warrants this week depict not gun-slinging outlaws, but amiable-looking intellectual types.

Their “very serious crimes”, according to police, consist mostly of calling for sanctions to turn the tide of political repression in Hong Kong. In the terms of the controversial national security law under which the warrants were issued, this is considered “subversion of state power”, an offence punishable by up to life imprisonment.

How extradition with Hong Kong works

Hong Kong is nominally a self-governing region of China under the “one country, two systems” model agreed to when the UK handed the territory back in 1997.

However, the national security law was drafted in Beijing and applied to Hong Kong after the tumultuous, protracted protests that gripped the city in 2019. These were prompted, ironically, by fears the region’s autonomy was breaking down.

A curious feature of the national security law is its purported extraterritorial effect. It claims jurisdiction over any person of any nationality who has committed any of its offences anywhere in the world.

Whether the Hong Kong government can realistically bring these people to trial is another matter entirely.

The international law of extradition (technically, in Hong Kong’s case, the surrender of fugitive offenders, as only states engage in extradition) includes certain safeguards. The act must be a sufficiently serious crime in both places, and it must not be a political offence.

The warrants in question fail both of these tests, notwithstanding the Hong Kong government’s hyperbolic claims about national security.

Moreover, extradition is guided by bilateral agreements between jurisdictions. Numerous Western countries, including the UK, US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, suspended their extradition agreements with Hong Kong when the national security law was imposed, foreseeing the politicization of criminal justice.

A billboard referring to Beijing’s National Security Law for Hong Kong, seen beyond a Chinese national flag held up by a pro-China activist during a rally outside the US Consulate in the city. Photo: Asia Times Files / AFP / Anthony Wallace

The pro-democracy figures targeted this week knew which way the wind was blowing when they left Hong Kong. They will probably never return there, a sad fact to which they may already be reconciled.

However, they may also need to reconsider their travel to jurisdictions which do maintain extradition agreements with Hong Kong or China.

The risk goes beyond formal arrest and extradition. The bounties on offer may encourage vigilantism, and sympathetic governments may turn a blind eye to or even facilitate extra-legal rendition of the eight exiled activists.

This is illustrated by the 2015 case of the five Hong Kong booksellers who disappeared from various locations, including Thailand, and later showed up in China where they “confessed” to crimes in the state media.

The existence of overseas dissidents has long rankled Beijing – as the lifetime of spats with the Dalai Lama illustrates – but in recent years it has shown increased determination to monitor and influence the overseas Chinese diaspora.

The government has even set up secret “overseas police offices” in Europe, North America and elsewhere, as bases for information-gathering and harassment.

Hong Kong brought to heel

In the past, China and Hong Kong could be regarded as distinct political entities, but over the last decade, the “firewall” between the mainland and the region has gradually collapsed. Hong Kong’s government and political system have been stripped of democratic elements, and its national security and law enforcement apparatus are now dictated by the mainland.

Compared with its mainland counterpart, the Hong Kong government goes to greater pains to paper over its actions with a veneer of law and legal process.

However, this tactic is increasingly transparent as it ramps up its pursuit of authoritarian goals. The cooption of Hong Kong’s once-celebrated legal institutions undermines their already-damaged legitimacy.

Hong Kong’s civil society has been brought to heel via a suite of repressive reforms spanning the legal, political, education and media sectors. These new warrants are the latest sign that China will never stop trying to muzzle its critics, so long as they are willing to speak out.

Ultimately, these warrants may be futile overreach – for the sake of their targets, we can only hope that is so – but the intention behind them remains condemnable.

Brendan Clift is Lecturer, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading