38 Oxley Road: A timeline of events
WHAT REPONDED TO THE SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT?  ,
Following Mr. Lee Hsien Loong’s ministerial statement in parliament on July 3, 2017, the story garnered attention in some of the biggest newspapers in the world.
He pleaded with all Members of Parliament to “examine the problems extensively and vigorously question me and my Cabinet acquaintances,” and that a thorough examination of the matter would help to dispel any doubts and foster greater confidence in the nation’s organizations and system of government.
A governmental council at 38 Oxley Road was set up to discuss the house’s future. It was presided over by senior minister Teo Chee Hean and Coordinating Minister for National Security, Lawrence Wong, the next secretary for tradition, community, and youth, and lawmaker K. Shanmugam. The latter is then prime minister.
In April 2018, the commission released a final report on the matter, with three proposals: Retaining the property in total, retaining only the traditional cellar dining room, or allowing it to become demolished.
Mr. Teo once said,” We rely, especially, on the objective data presented to us and on the crucial concrete steps Mr. Lee Kuan Yew himself took to implement his wishes in his life to achieve our views,”  ,
” This included the demolition section in Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s last can, his letter to Cabinet dated Dec 27, 2011, as well as the renovation/redevelopment strategies for 38 Oxley Road, which he submitted to the URA in March 2012, and obtained authorization for”.
The report did not offer any recommendations, only stating that there was no need to “make a decision on the house” at the time because Dr. Lee was also residing there.
The commission said the different options in the document are intended to assist a future government in making an informed and logical choice when the need arises.
WHAT May DISPUTES HAVE TO DO WITH THE PUBLISH?  ,
In his will’s last will, Lee Kuan Yew stated that he wanted the home to be destroyed in 2013. If that were not probable, the property may be closed to everyone except relatives and descendants.
Mr. Lee Hsien Loong noted in his ministerial speech from 2017 that the destruction section had been removed from the fifth and sixth versions of the will and had only been reinserted in the sixth and final can.  ,
The first six desires were prepared by Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s attorney, Madam Kwa Kim Li, between August 2011 and November 2012.
She was never involved in the preparation of the sixth and last will, which was signed on December 17, 2013, and was signed by his wife, Mrs. Lee Suet Fern, an attorney, along with Mr. Lee Hsien Yang.
Mrs. Lee Suet Fern’s management of her father-in-law’s previous does was afterwards found guilty of grossly improper professional conduct in 2020.  ,
A administrative judge and the Court of Three Judges, the highest administrative body for lawyers ‘ misconduct, determined that Mr. Lee Hsien Yang and Mrs. Lee Suet Fern had misled him during the course of his last will and that they had lied under oath throughout the trials.
After deciding not to enter a scheduled authorities discussion related to the issue, Mr. Lee Hsien Yang and Mrs. Lee Suet Fern decided to leave Singapore in 2022. Mr. Lee Hsien Yang stated on Instagram earlier in October that he would not travel to Singapore to attend his sister’s funeral and wake.  ,
Additionally, Mdm Kwa was ordered to pay S$ 13,000 in fines for misconduct in relation to the late Mr. Lee’s trusts in 2023.  ,
She had to give S$ 5, 000 for failing to “scrupulously guard” the later Mr Lee’s security while handling his will, and S$ 8, 000 for misleading Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee in an email response to their questions.
This occurred after Mr. Lee Hsien Yang and Dr. Lee filed four complaints against Mdm Kwa, two of which were later sent to a disciplinary court as executors of their family’s property.  ,
The second claimed that Mdm Kwa violated the law by sending emails containing files of conversations with Mr. Lee Kuan Yew to all three of the kids, despite the fact that Mr. Lee Hsien Loong was not the estate’s administrator. The following alleged that in her letters, she had given the heirs false and misleading data.  ,
Commentary: Newly elected and preparing for elections, Japan’s PM Ishiba is already on the defensive
Another thorny issue has raised questions about the demise of Japan’s” Three Non-Nuclear Rules,” which prohibit the possession of nuclear weapons, prohibits the production of nuclear weapons, and forbids the introduction of nuclear arms into the nation.
Nuclear sharing, in Mr. Ishiba’s opinion, do not violate the country’s non-nuclear principles because it would involve Japan participating in the decision-making process but not having nuclear weapons.
Nuclear posting is not a new concept, and it may be a part of Mr. Ishiba’s political support. Japan is wrestling with the problem of relying on the US to deter nuclear weapons while maintaining its commitment to a world without nuclear arms.
Former prime minister Shinzo Abe spearheaded it, which was later supported by conservative politicians, including Sanae Takaichi, Mr. Ishiba’s key LDP opponent. Mr Kishida, who hails from Hiroshima, was against the plan.
If Mr Ishiba’s management pushes these conversations ahead, the opposition will come from the government. Problems are growing in Nagasaki, a area affected by the nuclear weapon, and in Okinawa, which hosts a focus of US military bases. Locals worry that this will increase the load on military installations and cause the Three Non-Nuclear Rules to fall apart.
Malaysia Budget 2025: Will PM Anwar cut petrol subsidies, impose new taxes to improve public finances?
Despite the good signs, Mr Anwar himself acknowledged in an Oct 10 article on X that there was “much place” for development in the government’s fiscal leadership and performance.
For starters, the state is seeking to control its RM1.5 trillion debts, and is well on its way to reducing its macroeconomic gap to 4.3 per cent this year, with an eye on 3 per share by 2026.
In an effort to reduce spending on grants and social support by RM11.5 billion, a goal set out in Budget 2024, the state has also adjusted grants for meat and power.
The World Bank warned that further rationalization was required in addition to methods to lessen the impact on inflation and vulnerable groups, despite the World Bank’s warning in its October record that these initiatives were expected to decrease subvention investing.
After the effects of the walk on diesel, Malaysia-based economist Shankaran Nambiar reported to CNA that Mr. Anwar might be more careful about rationalizing the use of gasoline subsidies.
It makes sense for the government to pause before introducing the fuel subsidy rationalization, which he said, because the removal of oil subsidies was not liked by large segments of society.
” It might be mentioned ( at Friday’s budget ), but he’ll want to gauge sentiment and wait-and-see before actually implementing”.
SLASHING Diesel Grants
Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli stated in November last year that the authorities would implement a targeted gasoline rebate program in the second quarter of 2024, but authorities have since been largely silent on any kind of timeline for execution.
Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid, the head of Bank Muamalat Malaysia, stated that Mr. Anwar would provide more information on the move on Friday, including a timeline and instructions on how to qualify for cash assistance for those who are available.
According to Dr. Afzanizam, some fuel vehicle owners who might have been eligible for assistance were misled when the sudden announcement to eliminate subsidies suddenly saw a rise in diesel prices instantaneously.
The government could use the fuel show as a “template” to utilize the lessons learned in its diesel implementation, making the practice more” smooth” for those who will be affected, he said.
” That’s very important, because the moment you decide to cut subsidies, the price of RON95 will go up, and typically, other prices of goods and services will follow suit”, he added.
Their purchasing power will be impacted if they are eligible for cash transfers but do n’t receive them in time.
Commentary: Anticipating the first moves of Indonesia president-elect Prabowo
RISK OF Ineffectual Cooperation
There have been rumors about the content of the Cabinet, which are reportedly difficult because it is believed that Prabowo’s will be much bigger than Jokowi’s.
News reports speculate that as many as 44 to 46 ministers ( and ministries ) might take office. Future presidents have now had complete control over the number of Cabinet opportunities thanks to the new Ministerial Law, which was ratified on September 20.
There are also rumors that new ministers and organizations may be established while the already existing ones will be expanded or disbanded.
New coordinating ministers mentioned include one for Society, while fresh ministers may include policy areas like Education, Research and Technology, Environment, Forestry, Creative Economy, Law, and Immigration and Penitentiary, and fresh agencies handle National Communication, Nutrition, and State Revenue.
This expansion might lead to inefficient cooperation in the Cabinet. Interestingly, any new or actually restructured state institution administrative design will require a lot of time.
The new Cabinet wo n’t be able to begin working on the programs Prabowo has promised because of this. A larger Cabinet dils plan emphasis, with officials pursuing their own goals rather than national priorities, at the substantial or technical levels.
However, Prabowo may be able to win political favors and form a more united front in parliament by appointing key political figures to his Cabinet, especially if he offers positions to the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle ( PDI-P).  ,
Before Inauguration Day, we might be aware of the Cabinet’s content, but some fanciful reports mention a number of loyalists who might play significant roles.
The brands include Setyo Hadi, Sugiono, Rachmat Pambudi, Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin, Anggito Abimanyu, Burhanuddin Abdullah, and present Cabinet members like Pratikno, Azwar Anas, Airlangga Hartarto, Budi G Sadikin, and Erick Thohir.
IN FOCUS: Property agents are getting younger and gaining appeal as a profession. But do we need so many?
According to Professor Sing Tien Foo of the National University of Singapore ( NUS), more people are drawn to the sector because of rising property prices and “attractive” commissions.
Now, there are no established guidelines for commission rates, but house agents usually request between one and four percent of the transaction price, depending on the type of property being represented and the type of property.
The average annual income of a new broker under the age of 35 and who participated in at least one deal was S$ 30, 000 last year according to ERA. For those who made it to the top 5 per cent within the company, the figure was S$ 170, 000.
Although these figures are lower than those for 2021, according to ERA’s chief executive officer Eugene Lim, issues seem to be improving as interest rates are currently dropping and engineers are lining up for more new jobs.
According to Mr. Adam Wang, president of the Singapore Estate Agents Association ( SEAA ), how it has shed the image of a” cowboy” industry is also hurting the property agent’s appeal as a profession.
All new house agents may take a preliminary course and pass an exam as part of the regulation framework before they can be registered with CEA. Industry experts have rated the interview as difficult, with a passing percentage of around 60 %.
The estate agent is now a highly sought-after job because it is difficult to pass the examinations and maintain the high standards for the license renewal, according to Mark Yip, the CEO of Huttons Asia.
According to PropNex’s key agency officer Eddie Lim, their work has also “been a step further than just being a salesman.” It now requires a range of skills, including those requiring online marketing and financial analysis.
When all is said and done, salesperson work is no longer seen as a part income, according to ERA’s Mr. Lim.
Officials AND Customers: A LOVE-HATE RELATIONSHIP?
However, real estate brokers have also been accused of being unfair for what some people perceive as glamorous tastes being displayed online.
Taking a screenshot from last year’s TikTok video that was posted on ERA’s account. Titled” Asking millionaires how much is their outfit”, it features an adviser introducing his labelled clothing and accessories, which come up to an eye-watering full of , S$ 54, 700.
The picture has garnered almost 200, 000 sights to time and going by the feedback, not all bloggers are impressed. One person inquired about the video’s purpose and questioned,” Are we overpaying providers?” while another described it as “humble talking at its finest.”
After revealing in an online movie last year that he had purchased five qualities under his name and that he had given them as gifts for his kids and family, Mr. Oh, the 28-year-old agent, faced similar condemnation.
He claimed that the picture, which his group at JNA Real Estate produced, was meant to share his personal journey into home investing.
” I noticed some of the feedback in the online forums. That was tough”, said Mr Oh, with a laugh.  ,
” But my personal investments have enabled me to accomplish my objectives, which are to make my parents better off, and they are now able to semi-retire as a result of silent hire money.” I’m grateful for that, and I tried to show how real estate may help us better manage our wealth.
He claimed that his intention when he revealed his collection was to “build up private branding” rather than to show off. Mr. Oh continued, sharing his own trading knowledge and successes has helped to build confidence with his customers.
Additionally, Mr. Wang of SEAA made the point that brokers can use their accomplishments or habits to woo clients or recruit new employees.
” Some users prefer officials who are seen as successful”.
Market unsatisfied with Beijing’s 6 trillion yuan stimulus – Asia Times
In order to relieve the local government debt problems and boost the economy, the Chinese Ministry of Finance is anticipated to challenge 6 trillion yuan ( US$ 843 billion ) of ultra-long special Treasury securities in the next three years.
The release of ultra-long unique government securities, which have maturities of more than 10 times, is a part of China’s efforts to boost its market through fiscal signal, Caixin reported on Monday, citing some unknown options.  ,
Stock investors had been speculating about the size of the government’s potential stimulus package after the People’s Bank of China ( PBoC ) and financial regulators on September 24 announced interest rate and reserve requirement ratio ( RRR ) cuts and vowed to stop home prices from falling.
In the fifth China Macroeconomy Forum on September 21, Liu Shijin, a leading scholar and former deputy leader of the China State Council’s Development Research Center, recommended that the main federal issue ultra-long unique government bonds within one to two times.  ,
He suggested that the central government should use the bonds ‘ proceeds to buy up empty homes from the industry in the near future and promote industrialization over the long term.  ,
Liu’s remarks had a role in the recent rise in the property business in Hong Kong and mainland China.  ,
Both the Shanghai Composite Index and the Hang Seng Index have increased 27 % since September 24 before reaching their maximums on October 8 and 7, respectively.  ,
Some property owners have been reducing their holdings over the past year as a result of the perception that China’s economic stimulus deal is not delivered on time.
The Shanghai Composite Index has declined 8.5 % from its peak of 3, 498 on October 8 to 3, 201 on Tuesday. The Hang Seng Index has lost 12 % from 23, 099 on October 7 to 20, 318 on Tuesday.
A live-mic murmur
Finance Minister Lan Fo’an stated in a media briefing on October 12 that the central government would considerably raise debt by issuing ultra-long specific treasury bonds to help China’s local debt problems. However, he refrained from making the bond issuance plan’s scale and timing public.  ,  ,
When Deputy Finance Minister Liao Min was questioned by a journalist about the size of the bond issuance, Lan told Liao with a whisper not to reveal it for the time being because” the size is big.” The media heard Lan whispering to Liao while his microphone was turned on.  ,
Prior to that, according to a report from Bloomberg on October 11 that the majority of 23 investors and analysts polled predicted that China would invest up to 2 trillion yuan in a stimulus package to boost its economy.
On the same day, Reuters reported that Beijing was anticipated to announce 2 trillion to 3 trillion yuan in new spending.  ,
These predictions were actually not far off the recently released 6 trillion yuan package because the majority of the money will be funded by an existing special bond issuance program.  ,
The Ministry of Finance announced in March that it would start issuing ultra-long special treasury bonds in 2024. According to the statement, local governments can use half of the proceeds to pay off debt, and the central government can use the other half.
A total of 752 billion yuan of ultra-long special treasury bonds were issued in the first three quarters of this year, some of which had maturities of up to 50 years.  ,
If the Finance Ministry continues with this initiative, it will be able to raise an additional 3 trillion yuan over the course of three years.
Local governments can apply for 500 billion yuan of loans each year under this program, which will not be enough to cover the interest payments on the remaining local debt, which is now 43.6 trillion yuan from 40.7 trillion yuan as of 2023. According to the Finance Ministry, the average term for the outstanding local debt is 9.4 years, while the average interest rate is 3.15 percent.  ,  ,
Claire Xiao, a senior credit analyst at Fidelity International, said in a report earlier this year that China’s public debt is about 70 % of the country’s gross domestic product at the end of 2023. However, she added that if additional 60 trillion yuan are accounted for by LGFV loans, China’s government debt to GDP ratio is about 130 %.  ,  ,
A basket of measures
Lan stated in the media briefing on October 12 that Beijing would introduce a number of incremental fiscal policy measures:
- reduce the potential for local and LGFV debt,
- replenish state-owned banks ‘ tier-one capitals,  ,
- stop home prices from falling,
- grant loans to underprivileged families and scholarships to students, and
- increase people’s overall consuming power.
He claimed that since there is still room for the central government to raise debt and raise the fiscal deficit, Beijing’s stimulus measures wo n’t be limited to these areas.
It is possible that Beijing will provide more information about the issuance of sovereignty and special bonds after the National People’s Congress standing committee holds its regular meeting later this month, according to a commentary published by Yicai.com.  ,
Read: Chinese stocks cool down as investors check reality
Follow Jeff Pao on X:  , @jeffpao3
Zelensky Ukraine victory speech: Listen for the quiet parts – Asia Times
Zelensky is going to offer his “victory” speech , on October , 16 , to Ukraine’s legislature, the Verkhovna Rada, but much of the conversation will be underground.  , The key element is about giving up place to Russia.
Some areas may become accessible to both the legislature and the general public.  , He did suddenly push for more weapons, particularly ATACMS missiles. He will try to defend the Kursk operation, which has already resulted in the deaths of more than 20 000 people and has forced Ukraine’s army to retaliate consistently. He may complain about , North Korean , soldiers in Ukraine, but not provide an ounce of information there are any. Additionally, he may request that NATO troops assist him.
It is no solution that Russia views any NATO troop deployments as declarations of conflict that support Russian attacks on NATO offer points and foundations.  ,  ,
Inspiring foreboding is , Germany’s decision that it will no longer provide heavy weapons , to Ukraine, mainly because Germany does n’t have any. Although the situation in Germany is more intense than that in Poland or France, neither of those would be any more eager to see Soviet missiles strike their country.
With the exception of competent special forces, the British military in the case of Britain is hardly a shell of its original home. Instead of investing in its area causes, Britain has been wasting billion on aircraft carriers.
The Rada has  , merely passed fresh legislation , that allows NATO officials to command Russian products.  , Thus far, the Russians have been mostly silent, perhaps because they do not feel NATO will provide discipline commanders for Ukraine’s defense. But if it happens, and that is a major if, the Russians will see it as NATO sending combat forces and respond appropriately.
Some speculate that Zelensky may make an illogical suggestion that he wants to establish a buffer zone patrolled by a partnership of NATO-willing people.  , This is being billed as a Zelensky” agreement” to the fact of Russia occupying Russian place.
But it is a tough scenery.  , The Azov-style hardliners wo n’t accept such a deal, something Zelensky knows. There is no justification for the Russians to abandon their social goals, which include the disarmament and deNATOization of Ukraine.
Kursk is gradually but surely , being rolled up by the Russians , with no need for them to move troops from another fight areas in Ukraine.  , Zelensky also says it is a negotiation device of sorts, but in this either he is deluded or mistaken.
A couple thousand Russian soldiers are stationed in Transnistria, one of which is under agreement for peace-keeping, and others are reportedly trying to protect a massive weapons chuck left over from the Soviet era.
Russia may have a hard time defending Transnistria because it is so far from where Russian forces are stationed in Ukraine and Crimea.
The Russians obviously destroyed hangers and storage areas by firing high-fire weapons at the Lymanske airport in the Odessa region this week.  , The airport is a drone-assembly place for Ukraine. Road lines that transport energy, parts for robots, and another spare parts shipped from Moldova by rail are close to the airport.
Additionally, the Russians have been attacking Turkish dry cargo boats that are loading weapons and military resources from Turkey into the Odessa interface.  ,  ,
One can anticipate that if the Ukrainians attack Transnistria , the Russians will eliminate the weapons wastes and attempt to do as much harm as they can to Ukraine’s forces, mostly using weapons and heat energy. It’s difficult to say, if at all, how such a procedure would profit Zelensky.
On October 20, Moldova will hold significant elections. An attack on Transnistria could have a negative impact and undermine the existing NATO supporter. pro-EU Moldovan authorities.
The secret parts of Zelensky’s speech wo n’t be secret for more than five minutes.  , Once Zelensky’s opponents understand that he is willing to give up territory to Russia, he wo n’t last much longer as Ukraine’s President.
Stephen Bryen served as the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s team director and its deputy secretary of protection for policy.
This content was originally published on his Substack, Weapons and Strategy. It is republished with authority.
Singapore scrambles fighter jets after bomb threat on Air India Express flight
SINGAPORE: The Republic of Singapore Air Force ( RSAF ) scrambled F-15SG jets on Tuesday night ( Oct 15 ) after a bomb threat on an Air India Express flight. Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen stated in a Facebook post that the aircraft had learned that a bomb had beenContinue Reading
Nobel economics prize: prosperity needs strong institutions – Asia Times
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and James Robinson of the University of Chicago were awarded this week’s Nobel prize in economics for their research on why there are quite disparate economic levels.
While announcing the prize, Jakob Svensson, the chairman of the economy reward commission, said:” Reducing the big differences in earnings between nations is one of our days ‘ greatest issues”. The economics ‘ “groundbreaking analysis” has “much more fully understood the causes of why countries fail or succeed” than they have realized.
Officially known as the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economics Sciences, the award was established some decades after the 1960s ‘ original Nobel Prizes. The academics will share the award and its 11 million kroner ($ 1, 061, 826 ) cash prize.
The Conversation spoke with senior lecturer in finance at Lancaster University in the UK, Renaud Foucart, to reveal their job and why it matters.
What did Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James Robinson win for?
The three academics won the award primarily for providing corroborating evidence of how a nation’s institutions’ excellent affects its financial wealth.
At first glance, this may seem like reinventing the wheel. The majority of people would agree that a nation that upholds property rights, defrays corruption, and upholds the balance of power will also be more successful in encouraging its members to build wealth and be more effective at redistributing it.
But people following the news in Turkey, Hungary, the US or even the UK, may be aware that not all agrees. In Hungary for example, cases of fraud, corruption, a lack of media diversity, and threats to the liberation of the courts have led to a fierce struggle with the European Union.
Rich countries usually have strong corporations. However, a number of ( wannabe ) leaders are firmly in favor of weakening the rule of law. They do n’t appear to believe in institutions as the source of their prosperity, but rather as a relationship between them and their institutions.
In their see, why does the value of organizations vary across places?
Their research begins with the conditions that, evidently, have not had a direct impact on contemporary economic growth, as of the start of Western imperialism in the 14th century. According to their theory, colonial powers were more interested in cruelly stealing the government’s riches the more wealthy and hostile a place was.
In that situation, they constructed organizations with no regard for the locals. This led to low-quality organizations, during the colonial time, that continued through democracy and led to poor economic conditions immediately.
All of this is because institutions create the conditions for their own boldness, which is another area to which this week’s laureates contributed.
In comparison, in more pleasant and less established places, colonists did not take resources. Rather, they tried to build riches and settled. Therefore, it was in their ( selfish ) best interest to establish democratic institutions that would benefit residents there.
The scientists then examined historical data to test their thesis. Second, they found a “great turnaround” of wealth. By 1995, the locations that were the most developed and thickly populated in 1500 had become the poorest. Second, they discovered that places where settlers swiftly passed away from disease and were unable to remain were likewise today’s poorer.
An attempt to separate causes and consequences from the imperial foundations of institutions is made. The council would argue that even if the laureates this year did not invent the notion that institutions topic, their input is deserving of the highest distinction.
Some people have suggested that the article simply asserts that “democracy means financial growth.” Is this real?
Never in a pump. For example, their job does not demonstrate how to impose democracy from scratch on a nation with normally dysfunctional institutions will work. There is no justification for a democratic president to not be dishonest.
Corporations are a deal. And this is why it is crucial to preserve all of their characteristics immediately. Even a small portion of the privileges the state provides to people, workers, entrepreneurs, and investors could result in a vicious circle in which people do not feel secure that they will be protected from fraud or eviction. And as a result, there is less happiness and more evidence of authoritarian rule.
There may also be anomalies. China is undoubtedly trying to persuade the public that financial success cannot be achieved without a democratic republic.
Since Deng Xiaoping’s changes in the 1980s, China’s expansion coincides with the introduction of stronger home freedom for businesses and organizations. And, in that sense, it is a text edition of the power of corporations.
However, it is also true that Deng Xiaoping was responsible for the 1989 defense siege of the Tiananmen Square rallies for democracy. China now also possesses a distinctly authoritarian system that is more tolerant than northern democracies.
And China is also much poorer than its political peers, despite being the world’s second-largest business. China is facing significant financial issues of its own, and its GDP per capita is not even a fifth of that of the US.
Basically, according to Acemoglu, Xi Jinping’s increasingly authoritarian government is the reason why China’s economy is “rotting from the head”.
What current path are political organizations in different parts of the world?
Acemoglu expressed concern that the populace is rejecting political organizations in the US and Europe. And, indeed, some governments do seem to be doubting the importance of protecting their organizations.
They tinker with granting more energy to ideologues who assert that it is possible to succeed without a strict set of regulations that bind the hands of the leaders. I have no idea how much of an impact yesterday’s award will have on them.
However, if there is one thing to get away from the work of the winners this year, it is that people should be wary of using the occasionally stifling rules that support it to replace the baby of economic prosperity.
Renaud Foucart is a senior lecturer in finance at Lancaster University’s Management School.
This content was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.
Bomb hoax forces Air India plane to make emergency landing in Canada
NEW DELHI: According to the airline, the most recent threat of hoax bombs was made to Indian airlines, forcing an Air India plane to land in Canada for an emergency, the company said on Tuesday ( 15 ). The passenger aircraft, flying from India’s capital New Delhi to Chicago, wasContinue Reading