Commentary: Low interest rates of ‘money lock’ are a disservice to bank customers

THE CHOICE BETWEEN ANTI-SCAM SECURITY AND HIGHER INTEREST

DBS Multiplier, OCBC 360 and UOB One are what most of us in the personal finance space refer to as “high yield savings accounts”.

And as a customer of all three banks, I keep the majority of my funds in each of these three accounts for the simple reason that it pays me more interest than any other account in the same bank would.

The money lock feature makes me wonder why I need to choose between keeping my funds in my existing accounts and earning a higher interest rate, or moving it into a scammer-proof account and settling for a significantly lower rate.

I can’t say I’m happy with the latter, which is why I opted to lock my funds only in OCBC since it does not require me to give up any bonus interest that I’m already earning.

Interestingly, it seems that I’m not the only one with such reservations: Out of the 38,000 bank accounts that have reportedly activated money lock, OCBC customers make up 33,000 accounts.

Considering how Singapore is a prime target for scammers and that millions are being lost to scammers each month, it is disappointing that customers are being asked to choose between tighter security and higher interest rates.

Should we secure our funds but settle for a lower interest payout, or ignore the money lock feature entirely and continue collecting the usual interest on our existing high yield savings accounts?

The customer will have to decide, but it isn’t a pleasant decision.

Dawn Cher, also known as SG Budget Babe, runs a popular blog on personal finance and has a licence in real estate.Continue Reading

PT rebuffs wallet warning

NACC says cash handout scheme poses graft risks

PT rebuffs wallet warning
Supporters of the digital wallet handout programme gather at the headquarters of the Pheu Thai Party in October last year. (Photo: Somchai Poomlard)

The ruling Pheu Thai Party (PT) has brushed aside a warning issued by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) against the government’s 10,000-baht digital wallet handout scheme.

Anusorn Iamsa-ard, a Pheu Thai list-MP, said that the government is ready to listen to suggestions from all agencies.

“If the government had refused to listen, it would have already implemented the scheme. Previously, several sectors also urged it to go ahead as they suggested that the NACC’s recommendations would only delay the handout.

“But I believe the government is willing to listen to all feedback to ensure the scheme will be implemented in line with the law.

“The NACC should calm down as the scheme has not yet started. The NACC can wait until the scheme has started. It is not too late for the agency to scrutinise it. There is no need for the NACC to scrutinise it in advance,” he said.

“If the digital wallet scheme is delayed as a result of the NACC’s warnings, the agency must respond to questions from the people,” he said.

The NACC has warned the government about a range of potential pitfalls tied to the scheme, from graft to legal risks, while insisting the economy is not yet facing a crisis.

The digital wallet handout is the flagship policy of the Pheu Thai-led government to stimulate the economy, with 10,000 baht to be handed out to 50 million Thais.

The legality of the scheme has been called into question, however, as the government plans to request a 500-billion-baht loan to fund it, which goes against the party’s election campaign promise that it would not resort to taking out any loans.

On Wednesday, Niwatchai Kasemmongkol, secretary-general of the NACC, revealed the results of a panel study into the scheme that indicated it may be prone to exploitation by corrupt actors.

Mr Niwatchai said the scheme poses a risk of corruption as it could benefit certain parties, politicians or business groups. Graft could also occur during its implementation unless clear methods are mapped out to ensure all vulnerable groups benefit from it, he said.

As the economy has now started to rebound, the government should consider the financial burden the scheme will impose, and whether it is worth creating a debt burden of 500 billion baht, he said.

The NACC also warned of legal risks, including laws related to financial discipline, treasury reserves and a constitutional law mandating that the Election Commission should first inspect Pheu Thai’s campaign pledge made last May to ensure it matches the planned rollout of the scheme. If not, the promises made could be considered propaganda, he said.

He said information regarding the economy from the Bank of Thailand, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund all suggest it has not yet reached crisis status but remains sluggish.

Sorawong Thienthong, Pheu Thai secretary-general, on Thursday dismissed claims that what Pheu Thai promised voters during the election campaign last year differed from what was announced in parliament.

“No previous governments have ever been able to deliver on 100% of campaign pledges. A government must work with all sectors. It cannot do everything on its own,” he said.

During the campaign, Pheu Thai promised to give 10,000 baht to every citizen aged 16 or older to attract voters, making 56 million people eligible for the money. However, it later laid down additional conditions that would benefit only 50 million people.

The party said in its campaigning that the scheme would be financed from the budget. It now plans to raise 500 billion baht in loans to fund the scheme.

Government spokesman Chai Wacharonke said on Thursday that the government believes the digital wallet handout scheme is necessary as it will inject a cash flow into the economy to allow low-income earners access to financial resources, and this will help the country avoid the prospects of a real economic crisis.

“Currently, commercial banks are very strict in extending loans, which results in a lack of liquidity in the system and a lack of purchasing power and deflation. Without any action taken to address the problem, Thailand may face a real economic crisis,” Mr Chai said.

Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Palang Pracharath Party, on Thursday threatened to ask the NACC to launch a probe against the government if it insists on implementing the handout scheme, originally scheduled for May.

Continue Reading

Pheu Thai rebuffs wallet warning

NACC says cash handout scheme poses graft risks

Pheu Thai rebuffs wallet warning
Supporters of the digital wallet handout programme gather at the headquarters of the Pheu Thai Party in October last year. (Photo: Somchai Poomlard)

The ruling Pheu Thai Party (PT) has brushed aside a warning issued by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) against the government’s 10,000-baht digital wallet handout scheme.

Anusorn Iamsa-ard, a Pheu Thai list-MP, said that the government is ready to listen to suggestions from all agencies.

“If the government had refused to listen, it would have already implemented the scheme. Previously, several sectors also urged it to go ahead as they suggested that the NACC’s recommendations would only delay the handout.

“But I believe the government is willing to listen to all feedback to ensure the scheme will be implemented in line with the law.

“The NACC should calm down as the scheme has not yet started. The NACC can wait until the scheme has started. It is not too late for the agency to scrutinise it. There is no need for the NACC to scrutinise it in advance,” he said.

“If the digital wallet scheme is delayed as a result of the NACC’s warnings, the agency must respond to questions from the people,” he said.

The NACC has warned the government about a range of potential pitfalls tied to the scheme, from graft to legal risks, while insisting the economy is not yet facing a crisis.

The digital wallet handout is the flagship policy of the Pheu Thai-led government to stimulate the economy, with 10,000 baht to be handed out to 50 million Thais.

The legality of the scheme has been called into question, however, as the government plans to request a 500-billion-baht loan to fund it, which goes against the party’s election campaign promise that it would not resort to taking out any loans.

On Wednesday, Niwatchai Kasemmongkol, secretary-general of the NACC, revealed the results of a panel study into the scheme that indicated it may be prone to exploitation by corrupt actors.

Mr Niwatchai said the scheme poses a risk of corruption as it could benefit certain parties, politicians or business groups. Graft could also occur during its implementation unless clear methods are mapped out to ensure all vulnerable groups benefit from it, he said.

As the economy has now started to rebound, the government should consider the financial burden the scheme will impose, and whether it is worth creating a debt burden of 500 billion baht, he said.

The NACC also warned of legal risks, including laws related to financial discipline, treasury reserves and a constitutional law mandating that the Election Commission should first inspect Pheu Thai’s campaign pledge made last May to ensure it matches the planned rollout of the scheme. If not, the promises made could be considered propaganda, he said.

He said information regarding the economy from the Bank of Thailand, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund all suggest it has not yet reached crisis status but remains sluggish.

Sorawong Thienthong, Pheu Thai secretary-general, on Thursday dismissed claims that what Pheu Thai promised voters during the election campaign last year differed from what was announced in parliament.

“No previous governments have ever been able to deliver on 100% of campaign pledges. A government must work with all sectors. It cannot do everything on its own,” he said.

During the campaign, Pheu Thai promised to give 10,000 baht to every citizen aged 16 or older to attract voters, making 56 million people eligible for the money. However, it later laid down additional conditions that would benefit only 50 million people.

The party said in its campaigning that the scheme would be financed from the budget. It now plans to raise 500 billion baht in loans to fund the scheme.

Government spokesman Chai Wacharonke said on Thursday that the government believes the digital wallet handout scheme is necessary as it will inject a cash flow into the economy to allow low-income earners access to financial resources, and this will help the country avoid the prospects of a real economic crisis.

“Currently, commercial banks are very strict in extending loans, which results in a lack of liquidity in the system and a lack of purchasing power and deflation. Without any action taken to address the problem, Thailand may face a real economic crisis,” Mr Chai said.

Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Palang Pracharath Party, on Thursday threatened to ask the NACC to launch a probe against the government if it insists on implementing the handout scheme, originally scheduled for May.

Continue Reading

Black swan turns white on US debt default probability – Asia Times

We humans, as author, mathematician and former options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb observes, “lack imagination to the point of not even knowing what tomorrow’s important things will look like.”

That is unless we’re talking about Asia’s view of the battle underway on Capitol Hill over the US deficit.  

Taleb, famous for his 2007 bestseller “The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, argues this threat is hiding in plain sight. The “white swan” about which Taleb warns is a “spiral” as the US debt tops US$34 trillion and lawmakers gamble with Washington’s last AAA credit rating.

In November, Moody’s Investors Service warned it might yank away America’s only remaining top rating. That followed three months after Fitch Ratings downgraded the US to AA+ as Republicans and Democrats brawled over funding the government.

“The risk is right in front of us,” Taleb told an investment forum last week. “If you see a fragile bridge, you know it’s going to collapse at some point.” Taleb adds that “we need something to come in from the outside, or maybe some kind of miracle.”

Yet miracles seem in short supply as US fiscal priorities favor continued expansion. On Wednesday (February 7), the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said the deficit will continue to climb over the next decade, ensuring that interest payments, already a record share of government spending, become an even bigger challenge for lawmakers and burden to America’s bottom line.

The CBO sees deficits jumping to $2.6 trillion in 2034 from US$1.6 trillion this year. Today, the gap is 5.6% of gross domestic product (GDP); by 2025, it’s seen increasing to 6.1%. “The primary deficits in the CBO’s projections are especially large given the relatively low unemployment rates that the agency is forecasting,” the agency says.

Hence Taleb’s concerns that the globe’s biggest economy is courting a debt reckoning in ways everyone can see coming, as white not black swan.

“So long as you have Congress keep extending the debt limit and doing deals because they’re afraid of the consequences of doing the right thing, that’s the political structure of the political system, eventually you’re going to have a debt spiral,” Taleb said.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb isn’t the only one who sees a possible US debt default. Image: X Screengrab

Granted, the black swan scenario that the 2008 Lehman Brothers crisis proved to be has been invoked early and often since then. Wrongly, too.

In late 2021, many feared the fallout from China Evergrande Group’s default might be a systemic shock that very few had built into their investment portfolios. Not so much. The resulting chaos remained a mostly mainland phenomenon.

In recent years, hedge fund bigwig Michael Burry, who played a central role in the film “The Big Short”, declared it was time to sell US Treasuries. Then the market went on to boom despite tight US Federal Reserve policies.

Now, though, as US political polarization hits a fever pitch, there’s little scope for a pivot toward fiscal sobriety. As US President Joe Biden runs for reelection on November 5, his Democratic Party has zero plans for debt reduction. Ditto for Republicans loyal to ex-president and rival candidate Donald Trump.

“This makes me kind of gloomy about the entire political system in the Western world,” Taleb said.

It’s a reminder of how the US is likely to stress-test the global economy as rarely before in 2024 and a moment of maximum anxiety for Asia. With China’s property crisis undermining growth, Japanese growth flatlining and economies from South Korea to Indonesia to Thailand facing intensifying headwinds, the specter of turbulence from the West is slamming market confidence.

Taleb may be onto more than he knows. Former US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin has warned the current fiscal trajectory puts the US economy in a “terrible place.” Rubin, who helped lead the global response to the 1997-98 Asian crisis, recently told Bloomberg, “the risks are enormous and some of them are materializing already, like higher interest rates.”

Rubin earned his fiscal bona fides in the early 1990s as then-president Bill Clinton’s economic czar. Back then, Rubin struck a deal with the Fed: debt reduction in exchange for rate cuts, an arrangement that led to a balanced US budget and surpluses, too.

Now Rubin worries that the 3-percentage-point surge in longer-term US yields is just the beginning. The fiscal outlook has darkened and inflation remains elevated. Rubin cautions that when markets are “out of sync with reality,” things can “correct savagely.” 

Sadly, the political climate on Capitol Hill leaves little reason for hope lawmakers can head off catastrophe.

“Looking forward, we’re having to deal with both spending and taxes,” Rubin notes. But “when you get realistic about it, I think you’re going to have to largely” focus on the tax side to increase revenues.

As Rubin sees it, “there’s a lot of talk but the talk is always divided politically between the Republicans who refuse to raise taxes and the Democrats who won’t do entitlements.” His conclusion about Congress or the White House tackling the deficit is that “I wouldn’t bet on it.”

As Moody’s points out in a new report, “the greatest near-term danger to the dollar’s position stems from the risk of confidence-sapping policy mistakes by the US authorities themselves, like a US default on its debt for example. Weakening institutions and a political pivot to protectionism threaten the dollar’s global role.”

The dominance of the US dollar may be nearing its end. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Moody’s adds that “although we expect that politicians will eventually agree to raise or suspend the debt limit and avoid a default on government debt, greater polarization in the domestic political environment over the last decade has weakened both the predictability and effectiveness of US policymaking. Sanctions further inhibiting the free flow of the dollar in global trade and finance could encourage greater diversification.”

For now, the dollar benefits from a level of liquidity and low transaction costs with which peers can’t compete. Moody’s also points to a dearth of viable alternatives. This may ensure the dollar’s continued advantages in international trade and finance. Though down from 71% in 2000, 58% of central bank reserve levels around the globe are still in dollars.

Yet many worry the dollar is losing its reserve status faster than investors may realize, says economist Stephen Jen at Eurizon SLJ Capital. By Jen’s calculations, the dollar’s share of global reserves in 2023 fell at a rate 10 times the normal speed over the last 20 years.

In 2022 alone, Jen says, “the dollar suffered a stunning collapse” in its market share as a reserve currency, “presumably due to its muscular use of sanctions. Exceptional actions taken by the US and its allies against Russia have startled large reserve-holding countries,” most of which are emerging economies that constitute the so-called Global South.

In the past, Jen explains, the dollar was the “indisputable hegemonic reserve.” Still, he warns, its continued dominance “is not preordained” going forward.

“The prevailing view of ‘nothing-to-see-here’ on the US dollar as a reserve currency seems too innocuous and complacent,” Jen says. “What needs to be appreciated by investors is that, while the Global South is unable to totally avoid using the dollar, much of it has already become unwilling to do so.”

Louis Gave, economist at Gavekal Dragonomics, notes that “the dollar remains the world’s reserve currency, but for how long? After all, some 20% of the global oil trade is being settled in non-dollar currencies, debt in most emerging markets is outperforming treasuries in a tightening cycle and gold is breaking out.”

Cryptocurrencies, too. Andrew Peel, head of digital asset markets at Morgan Stanley, says Bitcoin’s “remarkable” adoption worldwide may accelerate the erosion in the dollar’s standing. He notes that 100 million people worldwide hold the cryptocurrency while companies like Tesla and nations like El Salvador are going digital.

Of course, not everyone thinks the dollar’s days are numbered. Valentin Marinov, strategist at Credit Agricole, notes that the euro’s share of international SWIFT transactions has “collapsed” while those in Japanese yen and British pound have “moderated.”

The “importance of the dollar as the currency of choice for international payments and transactions is another reason for global official and private investors to buy the currency,” Marinov says. “In turn, this should slow down further any push towards de-dollarization.”

The yuan is indeed making major inroads versus the dollar, both in global finance and trade. But some wonder if China’s policy missteps over the last few years might slow the yuan’s momentum toward reserve-currency status.

Fallout from President Xi Jinping’s crackdowns on tech and finance, on top of draconian Covid lockdowns, continues to weigh on economic growth. A $7 trillion stock rout since 2021 is further damaging investor confidence.

Now, Xi’s determination to boost the yuan’s value may bring unintended consequences, notes economist Rory Green at TS Lombard. Letting the exchange rate rise “could act to constrain monetary policy,” Green says.

In general, Green adds, the People’s Bank of China might be wary of easing monetary policy to avoid downward pressure on the exchange rate.

“Needless to say,” Green notes, “an artificially strong currency attached to a weak economy is not a good combination.”

Even so, the “white swan” troubles facing the US are about to intensify.

They include renewed contagion fears. Concerns about a reckoning for the US commercial property market are going global. In America, a slower-than-expected return to offices following the pandemic has occupancy rates skyrocketing.

Exposure to the sector saw Japan’s Aozora Bank record its first loss in 15 years. Moody’s cut New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) to junk amid real estate-related problems. Germany’s Deutsche Pfandbriefbank flagged its exposure to the “greatest real estate crisis since the financial crisis.”

Silicon Valley Bank’s troubles could still be the tip of the iceberg for US banks. Image: Screengrab / Twitter / TechCrunch

On Tuesday, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen felt the need to step to the microphone to claim all’s well in the financial system.

This week, NYCB shares closed at the lowest level since 1997 as about $4.5 billion of its market value evaporated. Moody’s says the institution faces “multi-faceted” market risks and governance challenges.

“There are reasons to think that NYCB is not the only struggling US bank, as others face a squeeze on both profits and asset quality,” write analysts at Gavekal. “But the problems seem especially acute among small banks, which have some 30% of their assets in the troubled commercial real estate sector compared to 6% at large banks.”

All this coming a year after the spectacular demise of California’s Silicon Valley Bank is putting Asian markets directly in harm’s way. And in ways that no one could argue markets didn’t see coming.

Even the man who popularized the idea of unforeseeable risks now says “black” is “white” where financial risks in 2024 are concerned.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Manpower Minister rejects suggestion to change how CPF interest payments are computed

SINGAPORE: The CPF monthly interest payments will remain the same, according to Manpower Minister Tan See Leng on Wednesday ( Feb 7 ).

He was responding to a question about whether the CPF Board had looked into how monthly interest payments are calculated from Member of Parliament Louis Chua ( WP-Sengkang ).

According to Mr. Tan, all members now profit from the game’s higher interest rates, even though changes may result in significantly increased interest payments for those making CPF transactions.

Now, CPF withdrawals and deductions made in a single month do not accrue interest from that month; only contributions made to the fund earn interest in the following month.

Mr. Chua questioned whether the table would take CPF achievements made throughout the month into account when calculating the monthly interest payment.

Additionally, he inquired about the pro-rating of the monthly interest payment to the number of times a sum is held in the balances prior to departure.

Mr. Chua explained in the House that the Singapore government’s Treasury bills and banks ‘ fixed deposits have been offering competitive interest rates, above the 2.5 percent minimum interest rate on CPF Ordinary Account ( OA ) savings.

However, due to the method used to calculate the CPF monthly interest payment, members who invest in such investments run the risk of losing up to two months ‘ worth of potential interest payments, according to him.

Mr. Tan retorted that it is important to consider the CPF system’s features that do not apply to banks deposits when calculating the latest method of computing regular interest payments.

He emphasized that despite a protracted low interest rate environment over the past 20 years, the government has continued to pay the Special, Medisave, and Retirement Accounts ( SMRA ) 2.5 percent minimum interest and 4 % floor rate.

He continued by saying that the CPF system offers 1 % additional interest to all members on the initial S$ 60, 000 of combined balances. On the first S$ 30, 000 of combined CPF balances, members 55 and older receive an additional 1 % in interest.

Additionally, he stated that consumers frequently lose any potential interest earned if they early withdraw money from banks ‘ set deposits.

The minister stated that while altering the computation method may result in slightly higher CPF interest payments, the features I’ve just outlined now offer our members significantly higher interest rates and a greater increase in their savings.

Continue Reading

Singapore bank giant DBS cuts executive bonuses over digital outages

Piyush Gupta, chief executive officer of DBS Group Holdings.shabby Graphics

Despite posting record earnings, the boss of Singapore’s largest bank, DBS, had his prize reduced by 30 % as a result of service disruptions.

Piyush Gupta’s variable pay has been reduced to S$ 4.14 million ($ 3.1 million, £2.4 million ), according to the company, and his full 2023 salary will be made public in March.

Mr. Gupta was paid S$ 15.4 million in 2022.

The nation’s central bank forbade DBS from purchasing new organizations or making non-essential IT changes for six months after a number of bugs next year.

Digital pay services and funds equipment went offline as a result of the disruptions throughout the city-state.

DBS apologized and made plans to increase the resilience of its devices known at the time.
The bank announced in its most recent statement that more junior employees would receive a one-off reward to help them with higher living expenses, while other individuals of its management team would have their variable pay reduced by 21 %.

Variable pay from DBS consists of both a dollars bonus and delayed stock. It is typically based on an employee’s performance and comes on top of basic give.

The bank posted annual record earnings, with its 2023 net profit rising by 26 % to S$ 13. billion, despite the cuts to senior DBS executives ‘ pay.

DBS has benefited from higher interest rates because central bankers have maintained the cost of borrowing in an effort to contain rising costs, like many other businesses around the world.

Following the earnings statement on Wednesday morning, the company’s shares were trading about 2.7 % higher.

Since November 2009, Mr. Gupta has served as the CEO of DBS.

The company has expanded its operations in China’s peninsula, Taiwan, and India under his direction.

Additionally, it has grown to become one of Asia’s largest money management companies.

Related Subjects

Continue Reading

Former IPP director Goh Jin Hian found liable for US6 million in losses by company

SINGAPORE: Goh Jin Hian, the director of the now-insolvent marine fuel supplying company Inter-Pacific Petroleum ( IPP ), has been found to be responsible for losses totaling US$ 146 million ( US$ 196 million ). &nbsp,

Justice Aedit Abdullah, who is the son of former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, ruled in favor of the IPP in brief remarks obtained by CNA on Tuesday ( Feb 6 ). The group had filed a lawsuit against the defendant for violating his director’s duty.

Goh, 55, was accused by IPP of failing to look into particular issues that would have made him aware that the business was being defrauded.

Goh asserted in his defense that there was no violation, no loss, and that the Companies Act provided him with relief from liability.

Justice Abdullah stated in his succinct remarks made on January 24 in advance of a whole view that has not yet been made public that Goh had an obligation to serve as the company’s director.

He stated that the duty is to keep an eye on the corporation’s interests. For the safety of the business, its owners, and its collectors, this entails, among other things, at least broad-level oversight of corporate officers ‘ activities.

According to the prosecutor, the evidence demonstrated that Goh actively participated in business management, took on responsibilities, and gathered knowledge and information.

While Justice Abdullah stated that a director need not be aware of all specifics, the data indicated that Goh was ignorant of IPP’s cargo dealing operations, which made up an important part of the company ‘ operations.

According to the judge, there were three “red banners” that ought to have prompted Goh’s investigation into the financial situation of the business. The business owed the organization about US$ 132 million, its bunker license was suspended, endangering its profitability, and Maybank owes a sizable sum of money totaling roughly US$ 15.6 million during the suspension of the license.

” The accused should have been motivated to look farther, learn more about the company’s real state of affairs, and keep an eye on what was happening within it because the financial situation of the business was suspect.” That was his responsibility as a producer, according to Justice Abdullah.

He claimed that dealings and drawdowns that resulted in losses for the business would not have been carried out if Goh had performed his duties.

The prosecutor rejected Goh’s argument that there was sufficient evidence within the organization to determine whether additional investigation was necessary or not.

He claimed that” an honest and fairly diligent director would include persisted and probed more.”

Goh also claimed that the banks had violated their obligations to the business, but the judge deemed this to be” speculative” and not a part of his responsibility.

The judge determined that Goh was not eligible for pleasure under the Companies Act because it states that the judge must determine the defendant acted “honestly and moderately.”

Justice Abdullah stated that “at the very least, the circumstances prevented the realization that the accused had acted reasonably.”

He acknowledged the whole extent of the company’s costs, including the breach from February 7, 2018, the total amount of drawdowns from June to July 2019, for a full of US$ 146, 047, 099.60, and the related interest claimed.

For additional instructions, such as proposals on costs, a deeper hearing will be scheduled.

Goh is involved in a legal situation before the courts in addition to this civil lawsuit. &nbsp,

In his capacity as original CEO of New Silkroutes Group, he was accused of engaging in misleading trading last September.

Goh stated that he was not guilty at his most recent pre-trial conference on February2. His following pre-trial meeting is scheduled for March.

Continue Reading

The right way to stabilize China stock markets – Asia Times

China’s most recent initiative to show leaders that it is serious about stabilizing falling equities is now showing signs of serious growth.

Investors have purchased stocks in everything from Alibaba Group to Meituan to Tencent to Ping A Group, to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing as a result of information that the China Securities Regulatory Commission will act in areas to stop sharp fluctuations in property prices. Bloomberg reports that Tuesday, February 6, the CSI 300 standard closed 3.5 % higher, marking its best moment since soon 2022. &nbsp,

The CSRC did lead medium and long-term funds into the stock market via a massive stabilization fund while limiting short-selling and dealing that is thought to involve insider trading, even though the specifics of the bourse-boosting strategy are unknown.

And it was undoubtedly no accident that Beijing revealed on Tuesday that President Xi Jinping is scheduled to receive a lecture from authorities on the state of the second-largest market’s troubled financial marketplaces.

China’s stocks has start rising right away, according to impulses from the CSRC. The state-led initiative was launched one month after Vice Premier He Lifeng demanded “improvements in the performance and profitability of listed companies,” adding that “healthy firms are a crucial “microeconomic bedrock.”

” We view this as a sign that the central government has started to sprout afraid of the stock market sell-off and is looking to put the floor in order to increase confidence,” says Economist Carlos&nbsp, Casanova, at Union Bancaire Privée.

A ground under shares may be created as a result of the movements. The Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets have lost at least$ 7 trillion since their peak in 2021. However, the administration’s response has n’t yet addressed underlying issues that are causing severe economic unpredictability and a general lack of confidence.

Beijing’s patchy approach to date, however, will only be successful in the long run if it is accompanied by a daring and trustworthy housing-related plan. Here, the majority of economists see China Evergrande Group‘s debt problems as a result of the 1990s negative mortgage crisis in Japan.

There are many similarities, of course, including a maturing economy shifting growth engines to manufacturing-based services, an impasse in asset values brought on by unknowable amounts of bad debt, and aging demographics endangering future financial prospects.

Then there is the slow speed with which policymakers in Beijing now and Tokyo back then are addressing the economy’s glaring flaws.

According to Henry Hoyle, a senior scholar in the Asia-Pacific section of the International Monetary Fund, “key house industry vulnerabilities have yet to be addressed, suggesting ongoing dangers to sustainability.”

The 1980s Savings and Loan ( S&amp, L) Crisis in America, which was brought on by a real estate value crash that sent shockwaves through already shaky banks, could, however, serve as an even more useful benchmark.

As luck would have it, US officials will be in Beijing this week to exchange opinions on the country’s economical problems both now and in the future. China’s dynamic threat will probably be less on US Treasury Department officials ‘ minds when they arrive than its weaknesses.

The real estate crisis is getting worse, the Chinese stock market is sputtering madly, negative risks are growing, and there are ominous regulatory crackdowns on tech, finance, also due diligence firms, all of which are making investors nervous.

The US Treasury’s secretary for foreign affairs, Jay Schambaugh, will lead a delegation that will be interested in learning more about the strategy China is using to stabilize the largest economy in Asia.

Picking Treasury authorities ‘ thoughts about the more recent global financial crisis in 2008–2009 might be one immediate desire.

Many investors could n’t help but wonder if last week’s news that China Evergrande Group, a major real estate juggernaut, had been forced to be liquidated in Hong Kong.

Even if a judge in mainland China recognizes the Hong Kong court order, Beijing’s more violent stance to have risk as well as prospective political considerations means the fallout will likely be somewhat contained, according to Commerzbank analysts.

Evergrande constructed residential properties in Yuanyang in January 2022. Online photo

According to Shehzad Qazi, an analyst at advisory China Beige Book, Xi’s team basically controls every aspect of the financial system, making it nearly impossible for supply, lending, or borrowing dynamics to collapse in the Lehman fashion fashion.

Because of this, the S&amp, L assessment is probably more appropriate. The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act was enacted by US lawmakers in 1989 to rid a sector of unprofitable property.

While putting thrifts ‘ insurance under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC ), the legislation established the Office of Thrift Supervision.

The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC ) was arguably the most significant development to take the remaining troubled S&amp, Es to heel. The RTC closed 747 S&amp, Init with property worth more than$ 407 billion at the time.

After successfully repairing the economic structure, the RTC was shut down by 1995. Not that the US had a lesson to learn. A few years later, Congress may make a mistake when they repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which established barriers between banks ‘ business, purchase, and savings operations.

The” Lehman shock” of 2008 probably would not have occurred if that Depression-era law had n’t been repealed. The same was true of the Silicon Valley Bank explosion from the previous year, which served as a reminder to many of how problems in two mid-tier banks that some investors were even aware of could quickly turn into symbiotic risks.

These comparisons are important in 2024 because of how America’s S&amp, L problems started and persisted beneath the surface until it was too soon.

Laws of finance “always work,” according to Adrian Blundell-Wignall, a former analyst for Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and present columnist for the Australian Financial Review. However, history is rife with the mistakes made by institutions trying to get away from them.

According to Blundell-Wignall, “it’s not only authoritarian governments that misallocate resources through state funding and money, capital controls, subsidies, and the problem that often travels with these elements.”

Problems will arise wherever money is raised with an explicit or implicit assurance. The Evergrande crises and nbsp in China make me think of the S&amp and L crises, but with the distinction that the latter is both a property developer and an intermediary. a triple risk.

Imagine &nbsp, Blundell- Wignall contends, a hybrid between an investment bank, private equity firm, and engineer. China, he contends, “has all the totalitarian regime issues and, where it permits proper well-connected private individuals to raise funds with an implicit promise to create residence, it ties onto this risk the S&amp, L-like problems squared.”

Several US Treasury officers attempted to sell Tokyo on the RTC rulebook in the 1990s. In the end, the organization had been successful in setting up the auction of bad loans as a way to draw in greedy investors and, in turn, strengthen public confidence in the system.

Could Xi’s team be more susceptible than Chinese officials making decisions in the middle to later 1990s? Only time will reveal. However, it would be wise for Premier Li Qiang and Xi to keep in mind that time is not on their part. &nbsp,

A file photo shows Chinese President Xi Jinping ( L ) and Premier Li Qiang ( R ) as time passes. NTV / Screengrab picture

The biggest lessons from Japan is that disposing of poor assets in a glacial manner leads to the very negative attitude that Japan still struggles with 25 decades later.

According to IMF economist and nbsp Hoyle, “many programmers have become non-viable but have avoided debt thanks in part to rules that allow borrowers to postpone recognizing their terrible mortgages, which has helped muffle spillovers to real estate prices and bank balance sheets.” Due to some places ‘ efforts to contain price drops through regulations and recommendations on listing prices, home prices have also decreased only slightly.

In other words, China is still addressing its problems ‘ indications rather than its root causes, just like Japan did in the past.

According to Hoyle,” China’s housing market faces more pressures in coming years from fundamental factors, in specific demographic change.”

” As the population falls and industrialisation slows, there will be less need for new housing in the coming times.” Millions of people moved to newer cover from older buildings devoid of modern facilities thanks to significant public subsidies in the previous ten years. As local government governmental restrictions have been tightened by declining land sale revenues and fewer residents are living in older housing, for demand will probably be more constrained, according to Hoyle.

Xi and Li do, in fact, have choices. The IMF suggests a quicker and easier move for the real estate industry. This entails allowing more market-based price changes and taking swift action to rebuild bankrupt developers.

This, according to the IMF, would eliminate the burden of inventories and allay concerns that prices will keep steadily falling. According to IMF leaders, regulations allowing banks to minimize recognition and nbsp of bad funding to developers also need to be phased out.

Beijing could take action to maintain top-line economic development in the 5 % collection over the course of both the short- and long-term.

The People’s Bank of China, the central bank, announced last month that it would release about 1 trillion yuan ($ 140 billion ) in long-term capital by reducing the reserve requirement ratio by 50 basis points.

According to economist Tao Wang at UBS Investment Bank,” The most recent PBOC behavior may be interpreted as the start of a policy tilt from previous sensitive and wholesale measures by investors, and they will continue to look for further signs and acts of policy help.”

China might be about to make a coverage change. Online Screengrab photo

According to Chris Metcalfe, chief investment officer at IBOSS Asset Management, “property companies continue to act as a lead weight on investment attitude despite several methods to help increase the cash available to home developers.”

These actions, he continues,” may help relieve the lingering cash crunch for Taiwanese developers who have been the target of Beijing’s crackdown to address the sector inflated debt levels.”

Beijing’s final solution to the home issue, however, is more significant than rising asset prices. Owners can only hope that Beijing’s sudden flurry of activity is a sign that the time has come.

William Pesek can be reached at @WilliamPess on X.

Continue Reading