Chinese dragon elegantly twirled around American eagle’s neck – Asia Times

There is an image that likely increasingly haunts the minds of US strategists: a Chinese dragon, no longer just coiled in defense but elegantly entwined around the neck of the American bald eagle. Not to suffocate but rather to regulate the bird’s breath.

The symbolism is not hyperbole. It captures a world where China, long caricatured as the imitator, has now morphed into a systemic rival, outrunning and outgunning the United States in critical business and security sectors.

From technology to trade, currency to cyber power, the Chinese state has mastered the long game. 

As Graham Allison warned in “Destined for War”, the Thucydides Trap is not only about the inevitability of conflict between rising and ruling powers. It’s also about the erosion of assumptions that the West has long taken for granted—namely, that liberal democracies will always innovate faster and govern better.

That assumption is collapsing under China’s weight. Let us now turn to the strategic sectors where China has not just caught up, but, in many instances, sprinted ahead.

1. Semiconductors: from dependency to near parity

Semiconductors, once China’s key vulnerability, are now the arena of its most dramatic gains. Despite Washington’s embargoes on Huawei and export bans on advanced lithography equipment, Beijing has poured over 1.5 trillion yuan into its domestic chip ecosystem.

China’s 14nm chips are now being produced domestically at scale, and according to Dr Dan Wang of Gavekal Dragonomics, an economic consultancy, “China is only a node or two behind global leaders, and catching up fast.”

This acceleration is powered by “dual circulation”—a policy that embeds state subsidies across the entire supply chain, from rare earth mining to chip design. 

In contrast, the US remains fragmented. The CHIPS and Science Act is slow-moving and could be scrapped while American fabs are still dangerously dependent on geopolitical choke points like Taiwan.

And it’s not clear that forcing Taiwan to build fabs in the US will even remotely work due to a lack of skilled labor and relevant supply chains.

2. Electric vehicles: Tesla in the rearview mirror

China’s BYD, not Tesla, is now the world’s top EV manufacturer. In 2023, it overtook Tesla in global sales and its footprint now spans Latin America, Europe and Southeast Asia.

Why? Because China owns the supply chain. From lithium in Bolivia to cobalt in the Congo, Chinese firms like CATL dominate the upstream. They also control over 75% of global lithium battery production.

As Professor Tu Xinquan of the China Institute for WTO Studies notes, “Beijing treats EVs as the next strategic industry, not just a consumer product.” The result? China is setting the global terms for green mobility.

3. Artificial intelligence: authoritarian efficiency at scale

While Silicon Valley battles over ethics and data privacy, Chinese AI firms race ahead by leveraging the scale of their digital ecosystems. 

With 1.4 billion citizens contributing to vast data pools, firms like SenseTime and iFlytek are training machine learning models at a rate unimaginable in the US.

Stanford’s AI Index 2024 noted that “China now publishes more peer-reviewed AI papers than the US and the EU combined.” 

More importantly, the integration of AI into national surveillance systems—facial recognition, behavioral analytics and even predictive policing—is an institutional advantage in authoritarian governance.

4. Space & hypersonics: leaping over the Pentagon’s horizon

In 2021, China tested a hypersonic glide vehicle that stunned Pentagon officials. It circled the globe before hitting its target—a demonstration of capabilities that America did not anticipate and does not have.

Today, China launches more satellites than any other country, and its Tiangong space station functions independently of NASA. 

This is not just about prestige. It’s about owning low-Earth orbit (LEO) infrastructure and building an integrated command architecture.

According to James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment, “China’s civil-military fusion in space tech gives it a decisive asymmetry—the ability to repurpose civilian launches into military capacity overnight.”

5. Quantum computing and cyber sovereignty

China’s quantum leap is not metaphorical. It has already built a city-level quantum communication network in Hefei and launched the Micius satellite to demonstrate secure quantum encryption.

While the US still grapples with theoretical breakthroughs, China is operationalizing quantum networks—one step closer to unhackable communication.

Simultaneously, China’s cyber units under the PLA Strategic Support Force have matured into a formidable force. 

As cybersecurity expert Adam Segal warns, “Unlike the US, where cyber operations must go through inter-agency review, China’s centralized command is more agile, more ruthless and more strategic.”

6. Infrastructure diplomacy: steel, fiber and sovereignty

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was once dismissed as “debt-trap” diplomacy. Yet in 2025, it has morphed into a network of real-world influence. 

Over 70 ports, 150 countries, and countless rail links are now locked into Chinese logistics systems. Malaysia’s ECRL and industrial parks under the “Two Countries, Twin Parks” initiative are cases in point.

In contrast, America’s Build Back Better World (B3W) never took off due to a lack of institutional backbone and material delivery.

7. Financial innovation: dollar dependency, yuan strategy

Though the dollar still dominates, China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) now clears over US$400 billion in yuan-denominated transactions annually.

As Professor Eswar Prasad of Cornell observes, “CIPS, when coupled with the digital yuan, offers China a way to de-dollarize bilateral trade without directly challenging the dollar’s global reserve status.”

Even in ASEAN, Indonesia and Malaysia have signed local currency settlement agreements with Beijing. The implications are serious: the US no longer controls the plumbing of international finance unilaterally.

8. Pharmaceuticals and public health diplomacy

Sinopharm and Sinovac may have drawn Western skepticism during Covid-19, but they reached over 80 countries. China became the pharmacy of the Global South, capturing new health markets.

Meanwhile, China controls up to 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) exports—vital for antibiotic and chronic disease drugs. Even the US Food and Drug Administration has flagged this as a national security risk.

9. Maritime dominance: steel leviathans in Asian waters

The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is now the largest navy in terms of number of vessels, with China launching new destroyers, frigates and carriers at an unmatched pace.

According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), China’s naval shipbuilding capacity exceeds the US by a ratio of 3:1 annually.

This has strategic consequences: with militarized reefs and carrier-killer missiles, Beijing is remaking the Indo-Pacific naval order—challenging the US Seventh Fleet’s dominance.

Conclusion: The end of complacency, the beginning of multipolar discipline

The Chinese dragon did not roar its way to supremacy. It studied the American system—its think tanks, capital markets, academic networks and defense-industrial base—and replicated a version of it with Chinese characteristics: centralized, agile, state-backed and global.

This is no longer a contest of ideologies. It is a contest of capacities.

For Malaysia and ASEAN, the time for strategic hedging has reached its limit. As Professor Lee Jones warns, “Neutrality in a bifurcating world must be underwritten by genuine resilience—economic, technological and political.”

China’s dragon does not need to strangle the eagle. It merely needs to squeeze at the right moments. And in that tightening grip lies the uncomfortable truth of 21st-century power: it is no longer about who dominates, but who endures.

Phar Kim Beng, PhD, is professor of ASEAN studies at the International Islamic University Malaysia. His analyses have been published across Asia and Europe, with a focus on strategic diplomacy, interdependence and power asymmetries.

Continue Reading

China’s strategy in the tariff wars – Asia Times

Xi Jinping, the president of China, is making position trips to Vietnam, Malaysia, and Cambodia between April 14 and April 18. It is Xi’s first outside visit this month, following the Central Conference on Work Related to Neighboring Countries held in Beijing from April 8 to 9. When asked what the main point of the meeting was, Renmin University’s Professor Jin Canrong, a well-known Chinese analyst frequently cited in Western media, stated to the Chinese website” Observer” ( guancha.cn ) that Beijing would talk to its Asian trading partners to counteract the effects of US tariffs. According to Jin, China will keep investing in Asia as part of its Belt and Road Initiative, but it will also increase domestic need to purchase more from its Eastern trading partners. ASEAN nations could buy Chinese state securities denominated in RMB, and China could use the money to buy more, replacing to some extent the US need. Jin’s remarks are above:

This conference on work related to neighboring nations was held in response to the extreme global condition brought on by the United States ‘ desire to impose tariffs. It showed that we hope to make for work a still higher goal in our country’s global strategy.

China and the United States are currently at odds with one another. China’s ties to its neighbors have grown even more significant in this regard. Constantly developing and maintaining such relations has distinct and far-reaching importance for China. &nbsp,

We can keep our nation’s good placement in the Sino-US tactical game as long as we can perform a good job of home work and neighborhood diplomacy.

Over the past few years, despite the numerous global issues and very difficult circumstances, China and its surrounding regions have remained relatively stable. &nbsp,

China’s surrounding areas will develop into a unique “island of balance” in the future and will experience robust economic advancement momentum. The area will see outstanding prospects and excellent value in the future.

The populations of the nations that surround China are also sizable, with groups exceeding 1.4 billion as well. Additionally, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Bangladesh have a large population, with 290 million, 250 million, and 180 million people, both. China and its surrounding countries account for about 56 % of the country’s total population.

Nevertheless, we have had good relations with our neighbors, but there are some flaws that are related to our growth rate. We are still not at the point where we are completely modernized. Our per capita GDP is approximately$ 13, 000, while that of the United States is over$ 80, 000.

Although development is the main goal of humanity, China is still in its early stages of development and hasn’t yet established modernization standards.

Our enhancement also has limitations, especially in soft energy, from the standpoint of a comprehensive national power standpoint. If our country’s per capita GDP exceeds$ 50, 000, and we have a population of 1.4 billion, we may create a huge impact. But, we are still not certain of it at this time. China is just a recent grad if the United States is a doctoral fellow in terms of the degree of development.

From now on, we may change our development strategy, increase our usage capacity and enhance people’s living standards. To do this, we must properly raise person’s income levels and give them total social stability. &nbsp,

In the past, many of our government’s governmental expenditures were used for investment and growth. The government may spend more money right now on enhancing people’s lives by using sources that are unrelated to significant industries. &nbsp,

By allocating and adjusting public tools, we can ultimately resolve problems in four key areas: accommodation, health care, knowledge and retirement. We can make domestic need and obtain inner circulation by improving welfare and increasing people’s investment in their livelihoods.

From a local view, the development of China’s domestic market will support the nation’s attractiveness to neighboring nations, boost the region’s job markets and development environment, and reduce its dependence on US and European markets.

Our practical work should focus on soft cooperation in the economy and technology. China first needs to strengthen its platform for regional economic cooperation and push for the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP ). Although the agreement became effective on January 1, 2023, it has not yet been fully understood. Under the RCEP framework, we should strengthen economic ties with ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

In addition to strengthening economic ties with neighboring nations, we should continue to support the Belt and Road Initiative, put our emphasis on promoting subregional cooperation platforms like the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area, the China-South Asia Dialogue, and the China-Central Asia Dialogue.

Guancha.cn: Most of China’s neighboring economies agreed not to retaliate against Trump but to engage in tariff negotiations with the United States. How should China explore its economic and trade potential with neighboring countries?

Trump’s recent decision to suspend the imposition of “reciprocal tariffs” on 75 trading partners for 90 days and concentrate on business with us can be attributed to two factors: On the one hand, it is punishing China because many nations have shown an attitude of surrender and kneeling to the US. ( While most others chose to compromise, Canada and the European Union vowed to retaliate. ) On the other hand, it is also intended to appease different opinions at home.

In this context, China’s external trade situation is unquestionably severe. &nbsp,

Some experts pointed out that when the tariff level between China and the United States exceeds 54 %, most of the commodity trade between the two countries will no longer have room for profit. The US increased its tariffs to 104 % and 145 %, but nothing much changed.

We must be fully prepared psychologically and willing to pay a certain price. Some scholars estimate that the impact of this tariff war on China may be as significant as that of the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic.

During the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic of 2020, China significantly changed its policies. To combat the crisis, the central government spent 4 trillion yuan ($ 547 billion ) plus local government loans in 2008 to address the crisis. In 2020, our country used its “whole-of-nation” system, similar to military mobilization, to overcome the pandemic. &nbsp,

We must act now and act now to combat the US tariff war and to prepare as we did in 2008 and 2020. &nbsp,

About 19 % of our GDP is exported abroad, but only 14.5 % of all exports to the US are made up of exports. Because some of our products are exported through third-party channels, the proportion may be even higher.

In the last round of tariff war, large-scale capital outflows from the mainland involved mainly Taiwanese and US firms, while the outflow of domestic capital was relatively low.

Let’s say that US exports account for about 20 % of our total exports. If China and the US’s trade is completely stopped, we will need to take steps to lessen the pain caused by a decline in exports to the US, which accounts for 4 % of our GDP.

Based on common sense, we can take three measures:

  • increase domestic demand through fiscal stimulus while pursuing internal consumption,
  • promote re-export through nations that are only subject to 10 % US tariffs,
  • explore new markets such as Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Latin America.

China and the United States could begin negotiations once they realize that China will not give in. &nbsp,

We can work together to negotiate tariff exemptions for some goods that are produced in China and then shipped to the United States, like Tesla and Apple, for example. This has already been approved by the US. – eds ]

We’ll press the other party into negotiations after the confrontation. After all, engaging in a trade war is intended to produce bargaining chips to keep China from losing some exports. If we can reach an agreement, all products made by American companies in China for the US market can be exempted from tariffs. This could lessen China’s desire to diversify its markets.

With all of the above measures, China’s GDP will be impacted by the tariff war overall, falling from 4 % to less than 2 %.

At the strategic level, I remain optimistic about China’s overall outlook. We can use this tariff war to prompt local businesses to make adjustments, promote the establishment of a domestic market with internal and dual circulation, and turn “bad things into good things” with internal circulation.

I can make a second suggestion. Faced with a 10 % US tariff, many countries will see a decline in their trade surplus to the US and receive fewer US dollars, which may cause a global shortage of US dollars. &nbsp,

China has the potential to use this opportunity to issue renminbi bonds in politically stable nations in large numbers.

The international market has a specific demand for renminbi. Renminbi bonds ‘ large-scale issuance can encourage Chinese investors to shop and invest there and help the country attract foreign investors. &nbsp,

Such a move will also help promote the use of the renminbi in global transactions and agreements, creating favorable conditions for its internationalization.

This article is republished with permission from guancha.cn, which was originally published on April 14, 2025.

Continue Reading

China Power: Cultural exports script a softer narrative in Southeast Asia

Thailand is a top choice for Taiwanese production companies among all the nations in Southeast Asia. &nbsp, &nbsp,

According to Jeff Han, a representative for Chinese tech company Tencent, Thailand was a prime location for ability and leisure production.

Google filmed its famous real hero contest set Chuang Asia in Thailand in 2024. &nbsp,

70 recruits from countries in the region, including Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, competed for spots in a fresh foreign lady group as part of the 10-episode series, which was shot in Bangkok. &nbsp,

Dr. Kornphanat Tungkeunkunt, a professor at Thammasat University, called it” a strategic shift” that “opened new opportunities” in international markets as well as a” striking move” that allowed Google to evade stringent domestic laws in China.

Beginning in December, Season 2 was shot in Bangkok, and included appearances by Season 2, rapper BamBam ( also known as a member of the K-pop boy band GOT7 ), Blackpink’s Lisa, and singer Jeff Satur. &nbsp,

60 aspiring employees from nine countries and regions competed for the title of the fresh seven-member boyband NexT1DE during the broadcast that aired from February 2 through&nbsp, April 6. &nbsp,

Thailand’s “dynamic pleasure business,” “well-established legend society,” and international attractiveness made it best to host and film the reality show, Han said. &nbsp,

The region offers an ideal environment to learn and nourish new talent, according to the statement from the country, which includes several powerful Thai stars who have gained worldwide fame.

Chinese leisure companies also face significant challenges in navigating Southeast Asia’s various and “uneven modern terrain” to provide shows and other offerings to local audiences, even as Chinese pop culture  offerings gain traction in the region. &nbsp,

All people will have access to the products, she said. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

US-China trade war stuck in a Prisoner’s Dilemma – Asia Times

It is tempting to interpret the situation as absurd brinkmanship as the US and China escalate their trade dispute through tit-for-tat levies.

However, beneath the surface, the routine resembles a well-known economics architecture, particularly the” Prisoner’s Dilemma” in sport idea, which is complicated by politics, national pride, and domestic politics ‘ experiences.

In the traditional Prisoner’s Dilemma, two players ( in this case, China and the US) have the option of cooperating ( lower tariffs, open trade ) or defying ( higher tariffs, trade restrictions ). The rewards are obvious:

  • If both parties cooperate, both parties gain and no one “loses mouth.”
  • If one cooperates but the other does not, the defector gains market share and a strategic advantage while the cooperator appears poor and suffers economically and socially.
  • If both suffer, both suffer, but at least neither “loses face” to the other.
Graphic: Author supplied

Mutually beneficial cooperation would undoubtedly be the most advantageous outcome, essentially economically. However, losing one’s experience in this situation has more serious repercussions.

For Beijing, being viewed as clinging to American force would not only damage its international standing but also its domestic social standing.

Being” hard on China” remains a significant political asset for Washington, especially under an leadership that is defined by its contextual design.

Time, respect, and Trump

This particular generation of the Prisoner’s Dilemma is much more complicated thanks to two more relationships.

Second, there is a terrible amount of trust. Due to President Trump’s well-known capriciousness, counterparties are rightly wary of any guarantees.

Depending on local political trends and lobbying preferences, deals may be reversed, tariffs can be raised without warning, and political logic frequently shifts.

Second, at least from China’s point of view, this is not a sport that repeats itself. Recurrent interactions, as explained in sport theory, encourage cooperation because each part is aware that several rounds will have the same consequences.

China is aware that it might only need one word or perhaps just another year of Trump’s administration to survive. There is little opportunity for Trump to generate significant agreements now that the US midterm elections are looming.

The safest move is to defect when the match is short-term, regardless of the broader economic value. Vietnam provides a somber illustration of what occurs when a player attempts to cooperate to first.

US officials flatly rejected Vietnam’s proposal to remove tariffs on US products, criticizing its trade deficit and accusing it of “dumping” cheap products like crab into the American market instead of rewarding the provide.

The training for China was clear: allowing too much time does not guarantee mercy. However, it might just entice more requirements.

More than just business

The effects of the joint dissolution extend far beyond the taxes themselves. Global supply chains are shifting as businesses try to diversify away from US- or China-centric types.

Rather, they are making investments in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and perhaps Africa, thinking of them as potential final-demand destinations rather than just as offshore producing bases. As nations look for alternatives in a fragmented global order, intra-Asian trade is growing.

In the US, political discourse has gotten more and more zero-sum: if China benefits, America may lose. This allows for the detail and compromise that are usually required by international trade agreements.

The price war is no longer simply an economic dispute as a result. It is a battle between political influence, pride, and narrative.

No simple way out

In a perfect world, both parties do acknowledge the harm done to one side and get a quick fix.

However, with trust waning, opportunities being misaligned, and the social cost of losing being always so great, common departure has turned into the Nash Equilibrium. Both sides want to scale up, and both would prefer to lose economically over appear weak.

The true horror is not just those in the taxes themselves. The root of distrust has been compromised, making teamwork more difficult both now and in the future. There are still two large options for breaking the damaging cycle: changing the paybacks and finding a face-saving leave.

The first is when departure turns out to be much more painful than assistance. This may occur if the social benefits of “looking hard” begin to outweigh the local costs of the tariff war, which include slower growth, inflation, declining exports, and a louder backlash from disturbed industries.

The second path is more psychological, but it is still significant. Both Trump and Xi have strongman personas, but neither is likely to back down without creating a compelling narrative that will prevent their faces from fading.

This might be a temporary truce that is characterized as a” strategic recalibration” or even cooperation in response to a larger crisis that draws attention and justifies de-escalation.

In essence, what’s needed is more than just a better deal; it needs a better story that allows both sides to retreat gracefully without appearing to have given in.

Continue Reading

FinanceAsia Awards 2025: Southeast Asia winners announced | FinanceAsia

As the world is still yet out of the tariff woods, leading financial institutions across Asia Pacific (Apac) continue to navigate the uncertain tides and have made waves in the uncertain time. In the meantime, It was another challenging year for institutions in Asia as the global economy continues to recover after the Covid-19 pandemic, with sluggish economic growth. 

It is worth pausing to celebrate people, teams and organisations that have withstood the test of another challenging, if not difficult, year. Not only does geopolitcal complexity persist, each market is on their unique mission towards recovery, sustainability, digitalisation, restructuring, or innovation. 

The FinanceAsia team invited banks, brokers, ratings agencies and other financial institutions, to showcase their capabilities when supporting their clients. Our awards process celebrates those institutions that showed determination to deliver desirable outcomes, through the display of commercial and technical acumen.

 This year marks the 29th iteration of our FinanceAsia awards and celebrates activity that took place during the 12 months of 2024. 

Read on for details of the winners and finalists (entrants whose submissions were ((Highly commended by our jury) for North Asia. Full write-ups explaining the rationale behind winner selection will be published the Awards edition of FinanceAsia, with subsequent syndication online.

Congratulations to all of our winners in the Southeast Asian (SEA) markets: 

BRUNEI DOMESTIC

 

BEST BANK

 

Baiduri Bank

 

INDONESIA DOMESTIC

 

BEST BANK

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

Highly commended – Bank BRI

 

BEST BANK FOR FINANCIAL INCLUSION

 

Bank BRI

 

BEST BROKER

 

PT CGS International Sekuritas Indonesia

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

Bank BRI

 

BEST CORPORATE BANK – LARGE CORP & MNCS

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

BEST CUSTODIAN BANK

 

Bank BRI

 

Highly commended – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

PT Indo Premier Sekuritas

 

BEST ESG CONSULTANT

 

UMBRA – Strategic Legal Solutions

 

BEST LAW FIRM

 

UMBRA – Strategic Legal Solutions

 

BEST PRIVATE BANK

 

Bank BRI

 

BEST RETAIL BANK

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

BEST STRATEGIC INITIATIVE – BANKS

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

Highly commended – PT Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – BANKS

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

MOST DEI PROGRESSIVE – BANKS

 

 PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – BANKS

 

PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

Highly commended – Bank Saqu

 

INDONESIA INTERNATIONAL

 

BEST BANK

 

BNP Paribas

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

OCBC

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

DBS Bank

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

Deutsche Bank

 

Highly commended – UBS

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

 UBS

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

DBS Bank

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

Credit Guarantee and Investment Facility (CGIF)

 

MALAYSIA DOMESTIC

 

BEST BROKER

 

CGS International Securities Malaysia

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

Alliance Bank Malaysia

 

BEST CORPORATE BANK – LARGE CORP & MNCS

 

Maybank

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

CIMB

 

Highly commended – Maybank Investment Bank

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

CIMB

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

CIMB

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

CIMB

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

 Maybank Investment Bank

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

AmInvest

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – BANKS

 

Kenanga Investment Bank Berhad

 

MALAYSIA INTERNATIONAL

 

BEST BANK

 

 UOB Malaysia

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

OCBC

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

UOB Malaysia

 

MYANMAR DOMESTIC

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – BANKS

 

KBZ Bank

 

PHILIPPINES DOMESTIC

 

BEST BANK

 

BDO Unibank

 

Highly commended – Bank of the Philippine Islands

 

BEST BANK FOR FINANCIAL INCLUSION

 

BPI Foundation, Inc.

 

BEST BROKER

 

First Metro Securities Brokerage Corporation

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

Security Bank Corporation

 

BEST CORPORATE BANK – LARGE CORP & MNCS

 

Bank of the Philippine Islands

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

First Metro Investment Corporation

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

BPI Capital Corporation

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

 BPI Capital Corporation

 

Highly commended – Security Bank Capital Investment Corporation

 

BEST RETAIL BANK

 

 Bank of the Philippine Islands

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

Bank of the Philippine Islands

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – BANKS

 

Bank of the Philippine Islands

 

PHILIPPINES INTERNATIONAL

 

BEST BANK

 

HSBC

 

BEST BANK FOR PUBLIC SECTOR CLIENTS

 

Citibank N.A

.

BEST CORPORATE BANK – LARGE CORP & MNCS

 

 Citibank N.A.

 

BEST CORRESPONDENT BANK

 

 Citibank N.A.

 

BEST CUSTODIAN BANK

 

HSBC

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

UBS

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST STRATEGIC INITIATIVE – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

 FinVolution Group

 

SINGAPORE DOMESTIC

 

BEST BANK

 

 United Overseas Bank

 

BEST BROKER

 

 Maybank Securities Singapore (MSSG)

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

OCBC

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

United Overseas Bank Limited

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

DBS Bank

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

DBS Bank

 

BEST LAW FIRM

 

Allen & Gledhill

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

United Overseas Bank Limited

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

DBS Bank

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – BANKS

 

OCBC

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

UOB Asset Management

 

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL

 

BEST BANK

 

 Citi Singapore

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

 UBS

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

Citi Singapore

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

 UBS

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

ANZ

 

MOST DEI PROGRESSIVE – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

Aberdeen Investments

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – BANKS

 

 CIMB Singapore

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

 Aberdeen Investments

 

Highly commended – Marex Solutions

 

THAILAND DOMESTIC

 

BEST BROKER

 

CGS International Securities Thailand

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

KASIKORNBANK PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

Kiatnakin Phatra Securities Public Company Limited

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

Kiatnakin Phatra Securities Public Company Limited

 

BEST LAW FIRM

 

Weerawong, Chinnavat and Partners

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

Kiatnakin Phatra Securities Public Company Limited

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

Bangkok Bank PCL

 

THAILAND INTERNATIONAL

 

BEST BANK

 

HSBC Thailand

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

 UBS

 

Highly commended – Maybank Investment Bank

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

UBS

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

UOB Thailand

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – BANKS

 

UOB Thailand

 

VIETNAM DOMESTIC

 

BEST BANK

 

Vietnam Technological and Commercial Joint Stock Bank (Techcombank)

 

Highly commended – Asia Commercial Bank

 

BEST BANK FOR PUBLIC SECTOR CLIENTS

 

Saigon-Hanoi Commercial Joint Stock Bank (SHB)

 

BEST BROKER

 

SSI Securities Corporation

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

SSI Securities Corporation

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

SSI Securities Corporation

 

BEST LAW FIRM

 

YKVN LLC

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

Vietnam Technological and Commercial Joint Stock Bank (Techcombank)

 

Highly commended – OCB

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

Techcom Securities Joint Stock Company

 

VIETNAM INTERNATIONAL

 

BEST BANK

 

HSBC

 

BEST COMMERCIAL BANK – SMES

 

Citi Vietnam

 

BEST CORPORATE BANK – LARGE CORP & MNCS

 

Citi Vietnam

 

BEST DCM HOUSE

 

HSBC

 

BEST ECM HOUSE

 

 HSBC

 

Highly commended – UBS

 

BEST INVESTMENT BANK

 

UBS

 

BEST M&A HOUSE

 

UBS

 

BEST SUSTAINABLE BANK

 

Citi Vietnam

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – BANKS

 

HSBC

 

BIGGEST SUSTAINABLE IMPACT – NONBANK FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

 

Private Infrastructure Development Group (PIDG)

 

MOST INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – BANKS

 

HSBC

 


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

5.6-magnitude quake rattles southern Philippines

MANILA:  A magnitude 5.6 earthquake struck off the southern Philippines on Wednesday ( Apr 16 ), according to the US Geological Survey ( USGS), with no reports of damage or casualties coming up at the time. According to the USGS, the earthquake had a degree of 30 kilometers off theContinue Reading