Markets (Page 66)

Barack Obama made a decision eight years ago that has hampered US reputation and control in the Indo-Pacific to this day.

Obama sided with strategic concerns by weighing political calculations when he considered and ultimately rejected the Trans-Pacific Partnership ( TPP, now known as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement on Trans-Pacific Partnership, or CPTPP ) ratification.

Joe Biden is acting in the same way as he weighs the order of US Steel by Japan’s Nippon Steel.

Basically concerned about national security, while in fact&nbsp, weighing the impact on political support&nbsp, in battleground state in an election time, Biden has announced his opposition to the price.

It’s a short-sighted choice that threatens long-term US national interests, insults a vital ally, undermines international monetary policy, and allows protectionism from trading partners.

Nippon Steel announced last December that it would buy US Steel, an iconic organization that was struggling to survive, for US$ 14.9 billion.

Nippon Steel promised to keep the business name and its headquarters in Pittsburgh, pledged&nbsp, and that there would be no work breaks and that it would help the company “grow in the United States,” in response to criticism from workers who feared cuts and economic patriots who were opposed to any sales of US businesses.

The Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States ( CFIUS) would review the deal first, but the US did not specify how that review should conclude. Some believed that the CFIUS critique would help pass the offer without pricking the Biden administration.

Biden then appeared to criticize the order, saying that it was “vital” that the business should be in British hands. Donald Trump, who will experience Biden in the November national vote, has been more harsh, calling the price” a hideous point” that he would stop “instantaneously”.

Kritikers have come out in recent days claiming that Nippon Steel’s operations in China threaten its control and pose a “material national security risk.”

” We cannot allow one of the largest American steelmakers to be gobbled up by a foreign entity with ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its military- industrial apparatus” ,Senator JD Vance, Republican of Ohio, &nbsp, told&nbsp, the&nbsp, Financial Times.

Nippon Steel refutes the accusations, claiming that it only has activities that and that no one has access to data about operations outside of China.

Refusal of the deal – also equivocation – is a mistake. Nippon Steel’s buy may lead to US Steel’s development and let its continued operation. It may increase US Steel’s competitiveness, giving the company a more lasting foundation.

Allowing the agreement to proceed would demonstrate that the US is truly committed to monetary co-operation with important allies and partners and the inclusion of their markets in ways that benefit everyone. It would help participation, promoting efficiency and development.

It would serve as an example for other nations as they work to strike a balance between promoting foreign investment and protecting private industries from predation. It would demonstrate that the US is certainly a liar, clinging to international markets without offering the same benefits to its rivals.

This is especially critical for Japan, which has been re^structuring its foreign and security policy view to&nbsp, fit more closely&nbsp, with that of the US and be the United States ‘ “global mate”. Chinese companies have made billions of dollars in the US in recent years, and they and their governments are working closely with them to integrate cutting-edge technologies that are essential to management in the twenty-fir^st century.

These demonstrations and signals are becoming increasingly important for US authority and credibility in the Indo-Pacific.

Since 2016, when Obama flinched and let elections bypass proper problems, choices in Washington have contributed to an picture of&nbsp, unreliability&nbsp, among local financial partners.

Withholding the purchase of Nippon Steel, one can confirm that the TPP was not an anomaly, that neither Democrats nor Republicans can be trusted to give the US leadership in economic and, consequently, strategic matters, and that China is willing to cede this important ground.

Washington must address the needs of regional nations as they see them if the US wants to compete with China. Economic opportunities are foremost on their list and they have &nbsp, judged&nbsp, the US to be failing on this vital metric. China is bridging that void.

Of course, no US president can ignore domestic political considerations. Biden does n’t have to. For both political and strategic reasons, he can back the agreement. The parlous state of US Steel is the second most important reason to support the deal, after the strategic justification.

The business has been losing money for years. Not only has it failed to innovate but, &nbsp, explained&nbsp, one industry analyst, US Steel “peaked out in 1916” and “it’s been downhill ever since”, driven by a corporate culture that’s content to be&nbsp, a follower&nbsp, rather than an industry leader. That’s why shareholders&nbsp, voted&nbsp, to approve the deal earlier this month, they know that it’s the best way to revitalize this humbled icon.

Biden should make the case that US Steel will survive if it is sold to Nippon Steel. New management can encourage the company’s modernization and the development of a new mindset in executive offices and workplaces. Japan companies are more receptive to stakeholder interests, rather than just those of shareholders.

They are eager to demonstrate their reliability as partners, and it is in their own ( and the country’s ) best to encourage greater integration between the two economies. That should aid in protecting jobs that unions and politicians who serve them.

Biden should n’t pander to blue- collar voters, peddling untruths about jobs or equivocating until after the election. Both would disprove the notion that US politicians are cynical and untrustworthy, and that lies, errors, or half-truths can be expected from them.

Biden should instead make a direct argument to US voters and US partners that he is aware of the national interest and that this sale offers the best chance to preserve steel jobs. It would n’t correct the error of 2016, but it would prevent making a new mistake among those failures.

Brad Glosserman ( brad@pacforum .org ) is deputy director of and visiting professor at the Center for Rule- Making Strategies at Tama University as well as senior adviser ( nonresident ) at Pacific Forum. He is the author of <a href="https://press.georgetown.edu/Book/Peak-Japan”>Peak Japan: The End of Great Ambitions.

This article was first published by Pacific Forum. It is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

Given that Tesla’s share price has increased since the start of the time, the stock price has increased on little covering and the return of unwavering optimism.

However, the Beijing International Automotive Exhibition should serve as a reminder that rivals in growing numbers have surpassed the electric vehicle ( EV ) pioneer and are increasingly making it appear like an ordinary car company.

The exhibition, which runs from April 25 to May 5, will feature about 1,500 manufacturers of new energy vehicles ( NEVs ) and components. NEVs include hydrogen gas cell-powered vehicles, electric motors and internal combustion engine variants, and battery-powered electric cars.

According to the event’s organizers, there are 278 NEVs on screen, including 117 fresh ones. 30 of the new models come from foreign businesses, which goes against the animosity shown by American politicians toward China.

Foreign vendors include major NEV companies BYD, Geely and Changan, power EV specialists GAC Aion, Li Auto, Nio and Xpeng, and Xiaomi, a cell phone manufacturer and technology firm that has started selling attached cars.

Huawei and Horizon Robotics, a Chinese company that ranks second only to Nvidia in autonomous driving processing systems, are aspect manufacturers.

European vendors include VW Group models Audi, Porsche and Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes- Benz, Hyundai and its affiliates Kia, Ford and Japan’s leading three manufacturers, Toyota, Nissan and Honda.

Tesla is not there.

Toyota and Tencent made the announcement on April 25 that they would work together to create energy cars for domestic consumption in China. Tencent, which has experience in cloud computing, information processing and high- size online services, has turned to autonomous driving ( which it refers to as AD ) as a new development industry.

Google Intelligent Mobility Vice President Shuman Liu notes that,” With its intricate road systems, megacities, deep populations and exclusive traffic behaviors, China … provides richer scenarios, abundant data and greater numbers of unusual and unexpected so- called&nbsp ,’corner cases ‘ essential for the safe and effective evolution of AD technology”. Engineer-talk for a problem outside of the bounds of the core case.

Add to that a distinctive Gen-Z segment that wants to buy a car with Level2 driver assistance functions, and you have ideal training conditions for AD, he says. Toyota will almost certainly use the information it learned in China to expand internationally. Additionally, it is reported that Tencent is working with Audi and Mercedes-Benz.

Nissan, Toyota’s trailblazing rival, and Baidu, a Chinese internet service provider, have signed an MOU to look into working together on self-driving electric vehicles. Nissan has also revealed two new plug-in hybrids and two battery-electric vehicles that it and its Chinese manufacturing partner Dongfeng Motor have developed.

The Volkswagen Group has announced four world premieres in Beijing: the Volkswagen ID, the Porsche Taycan 4, the e-tron, the Lamborghini Urus SE, and the Audi Q6 L&nbsp. Code, a concept car designed exclusively for China. Volkswagen, which first entered the Chinese market 40 years ago, intends to invest 2.5 billion euros in its production and R&amp, D center in Hefei to support joint development of electric vehicles ( EVs ) with Xpeng and the release of 30 new electric vehicles by 2030.

Volkswagen now has 39 plants, more than 90, 000 employees and an almost entirely domestic supply chain in China that includes Horizon Robotics. Its goal is to remain the top foreign car manufacturer in China and one of the top three in the country, where it is currently ranked second only to BYD in sales of all kinds of vehicles. To do that, it must rapidly expand its sales of NEVs.

Meanwhile, Tesla has dropped to third place in the NEV retail sales ranking in China. Data from the China Passenger Car Association ( CPCA ) shows BYD selling 586, 000 units in the first quarter of 2024, Geely 137, 000, Tesla 132, 000 and Changan 126, 000. BYD sold hybrid vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2023, which makes that comparison less relevant. However, BYD also sells battery-powered EVs.

Tesla’s NEV unit sales were down 3.6 % year- on- year while BYD’s were up 15.2 %. Geely’s were up 2.4 times, Changan’s up 2.1 times and SAIC- GM- Wuling’s up 35.2 %. The second tier of Chinese EV manufacturers, with the exception of GAC Aion, also experienced significant unit sales growth.

Tesla’s production and sales in China have dropped for two straight quarters, according to CPCA data. Tesla’s NEV market share in China, which was 7.5 % in the three months to March, no longer supports its standing as an industry leader.

Tesla’s first- quarter financial results were as bad as preliminary reports had indicated, with sales down 9 % year- on- year and net profit down 55 %. The company’s operating margin declined from 11.4 % to 5.5 %. Operating activities ‘ cash flow decreased by 90 %, and free cash flow decreased.

The main causes of this were the unit shipments’ and the average selling price’s decline. The recall of every Cybertruck shipped since November 2017 to fix a sticky accelerator pedal and the resignation of two senior executives have only added to these issues.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, is handling the situation by firing more than 10 % of the company’s workforce and conducting a thorough review of operations in order to reduce other costs and increase efficiency. ” This”, he said,” will enable us to be lean, innovative and hungry for the next growth phase cycle”.

That may be true, but the Seagull EV, the basic model from BYD’s mass market, is not. Musk intends to expedite the development of more reasonably priced vehicles, but Tesla’s concept of a low EV price is said to be around$ 25, 000.

Fortunately for Tesla, the US will almost certainly not permit entry of ultra-cheap Chinese electric vehicles into its market. The EU has already slashed import subsidies for electric vehicles ( EVs ) and may have to raise tariffs to prevent them. Although Tesla’s factory in Germany is subject to potential European tariff barriers, it may also participate in the job cuts.

Tesla’s earnings call in January revealed that” the Chinese car companies are the most competitive car companies in the world.” Musk stated to investors and other parties. ” Frankly, I think, if there are not trade barriers established, they will pretty much demolish most other companies in the world”.

Last November, he said,” There’s a lot of people out there who think that the top 10 car companies are going to be Tesla followed by nine Chinese car companies. I think they might not be wrong”. He appears to have been overly optimistic about Tesla’s future rankings at the time.

Follow this writer on&nbsp, X: @ScottFo83517667

Continue Reading

The EU legislature recently passed sweeping new regulations that may require businesses to protect against and stop human rights violations and protect the environment in their supply stores.

These are commendable goals. They have been a long time coming. However, there are real dangers of well-intentioned policies putting the poorest nations in a “green press” without cautious style and more strategic support for businesses and providers in the developing world.

The new EU green trade measures, which are penalizing poorer producers exporting into the bloc, are all intended to address a climate crisis that they did n’t cause, are raising the current concerns of many different types of developing nations.

Without a more concentrated support, the EU runs the risk of undermining its existing collaborations with developing countries to advance global growth and trade objectives.

The world’s 45 least developed countries may only account for 1 % of global merchandise trade but they are home to a quarter of the world’s population, some of them the world’s poorest people.

They have limited domestic markets and, because of historical trade ( including colonial ) relations, typically rely on EU markets and supply chains for around 15 %- 20 % of their exports.

Without additional support, the new alternative trade measures’ combined effects could cause more business obstacles that may reduce extreme poverty. The resultant revenue declines limit attempts by the poorest nations to adapt to climate change as well as development goals.

Ironic because these nations now foot the bill for the climate crisis and have the lowest pollution.

A’ natural squash’ for the poorest nations

My research suggests that the combined effects of the current and anticipated measures could result in a “green press,” leading to hundreds of millions of dollars in additional compliance costs. For instance, the new EU deforestation regulations alone could reduce some of the poorest nations ‘ exports by 10 % and lower an individual nation’s GDP by 1 %.

In Ethiopia, where coworkers and I have modelled the financial data for upcoming research, there could be up to a US$ 1.13 billion decline in GDP periodically. This is because producers who are unable to support them are excluded, and exports will be lowered as a result of rising compliance costs.

And this figure does n’t factor in all the likely knock on effects on consumption, investment, tax revenues, wages, employment and government expenditure. A similar position is occurring in other less developed nations that export products into the EU.

A few adjustments have been made to the European Green Deal, a set of laws intended to make the Union carbon neutral by 2050.

For instance, the forest regulation had intended to first categorize nations as having a large, reduced, or standard risk of their exports being connected to deforestation. However, the regulation will use a normal risk to all nations starting in December 2024, which is good news for exporters who originate from nations like Brazil that could have been high risk.

Perhaps a standard risk classification also calls for the complete traceability of items and their supply chains. Additionally, 3 % of operators and traders will still be subject to checks ( compared to 9 % if the nations were given a high risk ) level. Companies does require longer to adjust.

According to reports, EU coffee importers are already cutting back on their production because they fear growers wo n’t be able to comply. Business is now reversing its focus to less developed and less expensive nations where deforestation is viewed as less risky and have existing systems in place to monitor the effects of products on the environment.

The European Parliament will vote on the due diligence order for business sustainability, which may become effective starting in 2025. The order imposes a variety of compliance costs, which are more readily absorbed by larger businesses from a developing country standpoint.

As one major African fruit products exporter, Blue Skies, told me, the barrage of new audit and compliance measures will mean duplicated paperwork, travel and consultancy fees, adding £1 million ( US$ 1.25 million ) in annual costs, just to maintain access to its existing markets.

From 2026, the EU’s coal border adjustment mechanism may involve importers of specific emissions- intense goods like cement, iron and steel, aluminium, and fertilisers, to pay for the carbon embodied in these goods.

The EU has responded to questions about how complicated the investigating needs are. Once companies are required to report the pollutants embodied in imported goods, we can anticipate raising more problems.

Of course, rich countries had immediately electrify trade and production. This is not a defense for addressing climate change. Instead, it is a call for politicians to really consider how to ensure that new clean business opportunities arise in accordance with the UN’s global commitment to double the poorest nations ‘ share of global exports ( a goal that has not been met since its target season of 2020 ).

What could this glance like? For a start, the EU may develop more coordinated aid packages that take into account country-specific circumstances and manufacturing systems. Listening to places that have asked for more time to react, like Ethiopia, would be a good place to start. In addition, revision needs to be increased support for business support.

New alternative trade initiatives may support development objectives. In this way, we can prevent the natural squash and prevent harming the poorest nations.

Jodie Keane is Senior Research Fellow, International Economic Development Group, ODI

This content was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.

Continue Reading

After the Union searched the offices of a Chinese surveillance equipment supplier in Europe and looked into China’s medical device procurement market, Beijing has referred to the EU as “protectionist.” &nbsp,

The German Commission, the body of the EU’s executive branch, conducted its first-ever inspection of a Chinese company’s branches in Poland and the Netherlands on Tuesday night without giving any notice. &nbsp,

According to a statement released by the China Chamber of Commerce to the EU, police authorities authorized by the EC seized the Taiwanese company’s IT equipment and personnel ‘ mobile phones, inspected business records, and demanded admittance to relevant information. &nbsp,

The CCCEU stated that the EU’s deeds have shocked and dissatisfied it and its people. It claimed that the EU’s attacks had a negative impact on all non-EU companies in the region as well as Foreign businesses. &nbsp,

According to the report, the immediate, unanticipated inspection, disguised as foreign subsidies, undermined the EU’s business environment. &nbsp,

” The EU has been often using its economic and trade’ kit’ and trade ‘ solutions ‘”, Wang Wenbin, a director of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said in a regular press briefing on Wednesday. ” The EU says it is the most open market in the world, but as the world you see, the EU is obviously inching toward protectionism”.

He urged the EU to uphold its dedication to an open market and good competition, abide by the rules of the World Trade Organization, and prevent pursuing and restraining Taiwanese companies under different pretenses.

According to the EC, the inspected Chinese organization may have been given international subsidies that may stifle the inner market in accordance with the Foreign Subsidies Regulation.

Medical device businesses

The EU’s second investigation into Chinese businesses in recent months was the most recent raids of the unknown Chinese surveillance equipment provider’s offices in Poland and the Netherlands. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Prior to this, the EU launched inquiries into Chinese manufacturers of solar panels, wind turbines, and electric trains. It claimed that China had won green project contracts in Europe by using its socialist economic system to groom its state-owned enterprises.

Last October, the EU launched an anti- subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles. &nbsp,

In addition to these, the EU announced on Wednesday that it had launched an investigation against Chinese medical device suppliers for the first time under the International Procurement Instrument.

Evidence from the study revealed that China’s procurement market for medical devices has gradually become more opaque for both EU-based and foreign companies, as well as EU-made products.

It criticized China for unfairly distinguishing between local and foreign businesses, as well as between locally produced and imported medical devices. &nbsp,

The EU claimed to have already communicated its concerns to Chinese authorities in person and in person, but had not yet received satisfactory responses or actions.

With the intention to end the discriminatory measures, it will now invite the Chinese authorities to submit their opinions, provide pertinent information, and launch a consultation.

Within a nine-month window, which can be extended by five months, the EU’s investigation and consultations will be finished.

According to an unnamed representative from the Chinese Commerce Ministry’s Trade Remedy and Investigation Bureau, “in recent investigations, the EU has set clear targets, abused its procedures, and weaponized its investigation tools.” In the name of” fair competition,” these protectionist acts “have distorted the fair competition environment.”

China will closely monitor the EU’s subsequent actions, according to that spokesperson, and will take all necessary steps to vehemently protect the company’s legitimate rights and interests.

According to an industry report published by AskCI Consulting Co Ltd, China’s medical device market grew 10.2 % to 1.04 trillion yuan ( US$ 143.5 billion ) in 2023 from 940 billion yuan in 2022. The figure is expected to surge 9.1 % year- on- year to 1.13 trillion yuan this year.

Europe’s medical device market is set to grow 4.1 % to US$ 151.7 billion this year from US$ 145.79 billion in 2023, according to Eurostat. &nbsp,

Some researchers believe that China may have already surpassed Europe to become the second-largest market for medical devices in the world after the United States did last year. Even if it has n’t, China is likely to be able to do so in 2024. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Xi’s visit to Europe

The EU has repeatedly urged China to put an end to the Russian-Ukraine war over the past two years. However, it has been disappointed by Beijing’s response so far. &nbsp,

In a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing in December, European Council Chairman Charles Michel demanded that China immediately resolve its dispute with 13 businesses that supply Russia with dual-use goods. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, advised China to stop Russia from attempting to stifle the impact of sanctions.

The EU announced in February of this year that it was adding nearly 200 people and organizations, primarily from Russia, to its blacklist as a result of their efforts to provide Russia with advanced technology and military products produced in Europe. Some of these businesses have locations in Serbia and Turkey. &nbsp,

Xi Jinping, the president of China, is scheduled to visit France, Serbia, and Hungary in early May, according to media reports. In Paris, Xi will meet with French President Emmanuel Macron as this year marks the 60th anniversary of China-France diplomatic relations. &nbsp,

China’s industrial overcapacity and support for Russia will be on top of the agenda in the Xi- Macron meeting, said some commentators.

In an interview in February, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic claimed Taiwan is a part of China. He stated that Xi will travel to Serbia this year. &nbsp,

Read: Chinese firms to assemble EVs in Europe, duck tariffs

Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter: &nbsp, @jeffpao3

Continue Reading