Markets

Nirmala Sitharaman, India’s finance minister, endorsed her financial advisor’s proposal on July 25 to open the nation to direct Chinese investment, which has been successfully stagnant since the 2020 Sino-Indian border clashes.

According to a report from Reuters earlier this week,” India’s Chief Economic Adviser V Anantha Nageswaran said… that New Delhi can either integrate into China’s supply chain or encourage foreign direct investment ( FDI) from China.

According to Nageswaran, focusing on FDI from China appears more likely to boost India’s imports to the US than it did earlier, according to Reuters.

Following Russian President Vladimir Putin’s earlier this month visit to New Delhi, the proposed starting to China is intended as a rebuke to American diplomatic conduct there.

According to Global Risk-Reward Monitor, the Asia Times ‘ email,” On July 11, Modi asked Putin to assist India in resolving its long-standing border dispute with China.” Given that it pits the state’s two largest nations against one another, this is the most significant military discord in Asia. Russian mediation, but informal, may entail a political revolution, and make a mockery of America’s hope of uniting Eastern countries against China.”

In 2022, I argued that a statistical imperative—the declining inhabitants of non-Muslim parts of Asia versus the development of Muslim populations—would drive India, Russia and China toward a proper reconciliation.

These potential competitors have been pushed together by the conflict in Ukraine. India’s deep hunger for subsidized Russian oil increased its imports from Russia to US$ 67 billion in 2023 from$ 8.7 billion in 2022. India, also, acts as Russia’s supply broker, re-selling Russian oil and distillates to second countries.

Notable is the fact that, despite India and China having a border disagreement, India has not joined the US and its supporters in condemning China’s treatment of its Uyghur Muslim community. However, India has been accused of violating the rights of its Muslim majority in the United States.

We often engage with our American companions in these shared values ( of human rights ), according to US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, who stated in 2022.” We are monitoring some new concerning developments in India, including a rise in human rights abuses by some state, officers, and prison officials,” said Blinken.

S. Jaishankar, India’s foreign secretary, responded that India may say something about human rights violations in the US.

China’s growing business with the International South, somewhat including India, has advanced the leads for reconciliation between the country’s two largest countries.

India depends on Taiwanese supply chains to grow its trade sector. It imports pieces and investment goods from China and gathers finished goods for developed markets, as do Mexico, Vietnam, Indonesia and other Chinese trading partners.

Since the Covid illness, India’s imports from China have more than doubled, with the majority of China’s trade deal moving away from the US and Europe toward the World South.

India’s export to the US have risen in lockstep with its imports from China, as Nageswaran indicated. The two set are represented by the following chart in US dollars per month in thousands.

Physical and psychological investment of India are both constrained by. Although the two nations have comparable groups, India’s per head GDP is roughly a fifth of China’s in terms of purchasing power parity.

China is the nation’s expert in equipment. India faces a$ 1.7 trillion deficit in basic infrastructure, including roads, railways, water and broadband.

A 2022 World Bank report reckoned that” India will need to invest$ 840 billion over the next 15 years—or an average of$ 55 billion per annum—into urban infrastructure if it is to effectively meet the needs of its fast-growing urban population. ” The government spends just$ 16 billion a year on urban infrastructure.

India’s dilapidated bridge program, left over from the English Raj, adds only 4 kilometers of track per day. 6 kilometers of track was laid daily on the country’s first sea-crossing high-speed bridge range between Fuzhou and the port town of Xiamen in China. Foreign track-laying machines can put down 8 kilometers of tracks on average each day.

By way of example: China’s high-speed road covers the 2, 300 meters between Beijing and Guangzhou in nine hours. Four times as long is a significantly shorter flight from New Delhi to Bangalore.

China is among the best 20 countries in value of feeding, according to the World Hunger Index, while India ranks 111 out of 125 places.

China and India have roughly the same population size but China’s tertiary education rate reached 72 % in 2022, versus 31 % in India, according to the World Bank. China’s second-tier universities, also, train skilled engineers, while India’s executive education outside the renowned Technical Institutes is less dependable.

India has n’t participated in the PISA tests of student competence since 2009, when it ranked number 72 out of 73 countries. China ranks number 2, after Singapore.

Investment and transfer of technology are the things India most needs.

In the optimistic conceits of American experts, India will act as a counterweight to China’s influence in Asia.

Walter Russell Mead, a Wall Street Journal columnist and author, stated at the National Conservatism Conference on July 9 that” the rise of India has the potential to lead to the kind of Asia Americans have always desired to see.” China, which has grown so quickly, seems to have the notion that it can rule all of Asia and establish a new order in it. The economic development of India’s full potential will end that conceit in China, which will be accompanied by Vietnam, Indonesia, and many other Asian states. As India develops, it demonstrates to China that its road to hegemony is closed.”

Contrary to Mead’s wishful thinking, China’s export prowess is a magnet that realigns all of Asia’s economies around its economic sphere. Contrary to Mead, China does not want to “impose an order” on Asia because it is corrupt about how its neighbors operate, but it does want to reshape the region in its wider economic context.

The Modi government is considering a reconciliation with its northern neighbor in addition to that.

I wrote in 2022 that the humiliating abandonment of Afghanistan by America created a puddle of instability in central Asia. The American invasion aimed to end the Taliban, but it ultimately ended with its restoration, giving at least a starting point for Islamist radicals in neighboring nations like China, Pakistan, as well as Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. For China, Russia, and India, this presents a first-class strategic challenge. All three countries have significant Muslim minorities.”

What has changed since 2022 is China’s economic footprint in Central Asia. In the last four years, China’s exports to Turkey and Central Asia have tripled.

China is investing in developing nations that might represent a potential future source of instability and is helping America’s mess in the region after the collapse of Afghanistan by building railways, roads, and broadband.

India’s biggest internal problem remains restive pockets in its 14 % Muslim population. Russia, India, and China all have a shared desire to stabilize the Muslim populations of Asia. Only China has the resources to accomplish this through economic growth.

Spengler is channeled by David P. Goldman. Follow him on X at @davidpgoldman

Continue Reading

TOKYO — Suffice to say, 2024 has n’t turned out the way Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida expected.

Rather than being a superstar in Asia, Japan’s economy is skirting crisis. The&nbsp, Bank of Japan&nbsp, still has n’t hiked interest rates, though Tokyo had fully expected a tightening move or two by now.

Instead of coasting to win in September’s Liberal Democratic Party vote, Kishida’s approval rating is stuck in the small 20s. China, which suffers from a deflation, is more of a development drag on Asia than it does a growth engine.

The biggest punch to Kishida’s belief that he knew anything about 2024 is that he is coming from Washington.

Joe Biden’s devastating political discussion with Donald Trump on June 27 was the first. Therefore, Biden’s decision not to work for re-election, leaving Tokyo to know which of its officials may have &nbsp, Kamala Harris‘s telephone number.

As the chances of a Trump-friendly White House rise and drew nearer to the Northern Asian economic perspective, China, South Korea, and Taiwan also face political whims.

In Beijing, Xi Jinping’s government abruptly sees the risk of 60 % across-the-board taxes as a clear and present danger as Trump’s political prospects rise to once-unthinkable rates.

The People’s Bank of China announced a surprise rate cut on Thursday ( July 25 ) amid concerns about slowing growth. The PBOC cut the medium-term lending facility&nbsp, by 20 basis points to 2.3 %.

As Trump attempts to restart trade wars, President Yoon Suk-yeol’s troubled administration in Seoul is immediately playing out losses. Additionally, North Korean authorities may develop emergency plans for Trump to deepen his crazy relationship with Kim Jong Un’s violent regime.

Taiwan, however, senses a&nbsp, great bullseye&nbsp, on its market. Lately, Trump accused Taipei of stealing America’s market share in the US$ 500 billion business of making computer chips. In a Bloomberg interview, &nbsp, the Republican candidate&nbsp, said Taiwan snatched “almost 100 %” of the business. ” We should have never permit that happen”, Trump complained.

Wedbush Securities researcher Dan Ives says that” we have seen a terrible software sell-off post Trump responses to the press.” about enforcing stronger Chinese taxes and protecting Taiwan from China, which caused the Street’s Ban on Semis, AI Revolution labels, and Big Tech.

For today, though, authorities in Tokyo are perhaps the most befuddled about what might lie ahead.

Before then, the ghost of a Trump 2.0 White House had n’t been taken too seriously by&nbsp, Tokyo government. Today, the situation has Japan’s state scrambling to examine the many risks this would cause — starting with Asia’s second-biggest business.

” Japan’s economy is in for a big ‘ Trump shock ‘ if Donald Trump returns to the White House”, says economist Richard&nbsp, Katz, author of&nbsp,” The Contest for Japan’s Economic Future” &nbsp, and the Japan Economy Watch newsletter.

His plan to impose an all-inclusive 10 % tax on all imports and 60 % on imports from China will seriously affect both the delicate global supply chains and the need for Japanese exports, Katz claims.

Katz warns that Trump’s inflationary plans, including more significant tax cuts and tariffs, will force the Fed to raise interest rates beyond what the Reserve currently intends. That, in turn, will put upward pressure on the renminbi”.

These challenges, and other uncertainties, are now complicating the Bank of Japan’s selection at next year ‘s&nbsp, July 30-31&nbsp, plan meeting. Anticipation that Governor Kazuo Ueda’s crew might raise interest rates may actually be overstated.

Now, Ueda confronts conflicting financial currents. On the one hand, the secret market is displaying encouraging signs of recovery, as demonstrated by the rise in the Jibun Bank Flash Japan Composite getting professionals index to 52.6 in July. It marked the fifth straight month of development.

Nevertheless, BOJ representatives notice a decline in consumer spending at a time when the market is only just starting to expand. Tightening today might even end&nbsp, Japan’s best inventory rally&nbsp, in more than 35 times.

This last tidbit explains why BlackRock Inc. is so confident that the BOJ wo n’t act next week. ” We expect an flexible environment to remain in Japan”, Yuichi Chiguchi, chief investment strategist at the Japan component of the country’s biggest asset manager, tells Bloomberg.

Another danger: a skyrocketing change level may unsettle global investors as the so-called “yen-carry business” goes awry. Immediately, investors who borrow cheaply in the yen could sell their positions in high-yielding assets all over, including those in Seoul and Shanghai.

Forex traders ‘ opinions about the BOJ meet next week are much more divided than usual. According to Charu Chanana, head of FX approach at Saxo Capital Markets, “potentially squeezing the yen small posts is a popular approach over the last few times.”

According to Chanana, Fed easing bets coincide with “expected that the Bank of Japan may increase rates further at the July meeting.” This potential change in yield differentials favors the yen.

Takeshi Yamaguchi, an economist at Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities, states that” we believe the economic case for a July rate increase is compelling because more data points to a rise in the underlying inflation trend.”

Meanwhile, Kishida’s political fate is getting renewed attention in the days since Biden bowed out of the election.

Within his party, Kishida is under pressure to “pull a Biden” so that the LDP can find a more dynamic successor. A new prime minister is needed, according to party powerbrokers who believe the country’s fragile economy and a string of finance scandals.

Biden’s political recusal robbed Kishida of a top selling point: a strong relationship with the&nbsp, US leader. Kishida also gained points from trilateral summits with Yoon and Biden as well as his closeness to Biden.

This sort of detente with Seoul disapproves Xi’s Communist Party, which fears that the US, Japan, and South Korea are constructing a democratic bulwark against China. even occasionally involving Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

Biden’s exit complicates Kishida’s way forward. In much of his 33 months in office, Kishida struggled to get his support rates into the 30s, never mind the 20s they’re stuck in now. Even though Japan’s opposition parties are in disarray, the LDP may opt for a new face before September.

Should Trump return, Japan is not without leverage. For one thing, Kishida initiated a big jump in defense spending, heading off what’s sure to be a top Trump priority. For another, Japan is America’s top foreign investor.

” Trump wants Japan to keep investing in the United States”, notes David Boling, an analyst at Eurasia Group. Boling continues,” the United States needs Japan as an ally to effectively counter China.” Advisers to Trump will remind him of Japan’s importance”.

Given that” trade policy is one of Trump’s highest priorities and tariffs are in his genetic makeup, it will be difficult for Japan to avoid higher tariffs if Trump returns to office,” Boling writes.

Should the yen resume its decline, Trump might be even harder on Tokyo. According to Jasmine Duan, senior investment strategist at RBC Wealth Management Asia, the markets will be watching for Trump’s actions to increase the yen’s rise.

Bottom line,” we do n’t think Japan would be the&nbsp, safest market&nbsp, in Asia if Trump is re-elected”, Duan notes.

Trump’s trade dispute may have a far reaching impact beyond Asia. ” For Europe, the prime concern is tariffs”, says Sharon Bell, an analyst at Goldman Sachs. ” Trump has pledged to impose a 10 % tariff on all US imports. According to our economists, the US GDP could be reduced by 0.5 percentage points and by one percentage point from the Euro area.

Each one percentage point drop in sales-weighted gross domestic product could mean a 10 % drop in earnings per share, Bell explains.

The numerous different scenarios that investors must consider before the US election&nbsp, on November 5, add to the confusion factor.

David Roche, president of Quantum Strategy, thinks that Harris leading the Democrats boosts the odds of a Trump victory. However, it also makes it less likely that the Republicans will control both of Congress.

On the other hand, says Charles Myers, founder and CEO of advisory firm Signum Global Policy, Harris could spell trouble for Trump’s election hopes. Myers claims that Harris ‘ nomination as the Democratic nominee” a whole new race” makes it” a whole new.”

” There’s a new candidate with an enormous amount of unity and enthusiasm behind her”, Myers explains. She’ll be a key driver of women, young people, Black voters … I think people will underestimate her, “he added.

Bottom line”, I think that it’s a bit too early for the markets to declare victory for Trump, and I think she’s going to give him a real run for his money,” Myers says.

Anatole Kaletsky, economist at Gavekal Dragonomics, adds that” whatever one thinks of Kamala Harris, her chances of winning the election are certainly higher than were Biden’s. And the remote possibility that the Democrats might agree on another, much better candidate than Harris— while a low-probability&nbsp, tail risk&nbsp, — would transform the likely outcome of the race.”

Kaletsky notes that, until new polls are released and the Democrats ‘ succession is clarified, it is impossible to quantify the scale of this transformation. My guess is that Trump will hold onto his position of authority for the next few weeks, at most until Labor Day’s traditional start of full-scale campaigning. But I think his probability of winning will fall sharply from last week’s 70 % or 80 %&nbsp, in the best election models, to something like 55 %.”

In theory, Tokyo would prefer a Harris victory, viewing it as the best chance of continuity. One of Trump’s biggest fears is that he will continue to try to bury Tokyo for$ 8 billion annually to house US troops ( Trump 1.0 tried unsuccessfully to do that policy ).

Japan also worries that Trump, who is “grand bargain,” may negotiate a “grand bargain” trade agreement with Xi, leaving other important Asian nations staring in the face.

But whether a Trump Trade emerges, or Harris wins the presidency, all that officials in Tokyo, Beijing, Seoul and Taipei thought they knew about the year ahead is no longer clear or certain.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Two opposing perceptions of North Korea’s younger technology have been presented to the outside world.

In the outside media, children are portrayed as rebel and dramatic, ignoring the Kim regime’s increasingly severe crackdowns on international media and trends, and rather toting the latest North Vietnamese fashion trends and adopting North Vietnamese lingo.

However, position advertising perpetuates the notion that young people in North Korea are incredibly committed to Kim Jong Un and the government.

Both conceptions of North Korea’s younger technology fail to acknowledge a more sophisticated reality.

Kim Jong Un is aware of the importance of winning over the younger generation in order to maintain his administration’s life. Since coming into strength, Kim has increased the magnitude of consequences for importing, distributing and consuming international press. This stale details environment amplifies the effectiveness of a youth-focused youth-loyalty campaign intended to be a bear hug to the younger generation.

As a consequence, when compared with older groups, North Korean children have a more positive perspective of the government, juche philosophy, and Kim Jong Un himself. In summary, the plan is successful.

A revitalized international media transmission strategy is needed to split the deadlock and win the battle over hearts and minds. Despite the dangers, North Koreans continue to be very interested in foreign press. Study shows that those who consume tend to feel more warmly about South Korea and see the North Vietnamese government thoroughly.

European media provide a strong foundation for a common knowledge of concepts like animal rights and civil society and can serve as a strong foundation for regime propaganda. A revitalized approach should focus on content collection and modern propagation methods to maximize energy and decrease blowback for end users in North Korea.

There are two types of the children of North Korea.

The outside world is presented with two very distinct narratives of North Korea’s children. On the one hand, the state media in North Korea portrays the country’s youth and twenty-somethings as steadfast supporters of the “revolutionary” produce led by Kim Jong Un. But, on the other hand, illegal balances hint that these youngsters are extremely questioning the faithful orientation that represented prior generations.

The youth’s ideological orientation speaks to the regime’s long-term viability, prospects for reconciliation with the international community, and a soft landing: change from within, which does n’t lead to bloodshed, more than just an academic discussion.

Kim Jong Un’s decision approach necessitates that he inculcates the children to feel the outside world is a hostile area. His autocratic control is legitimized by this assault mentality. The challenge for young people’s hearts and minds — pitting passion for the Marshal against South Korean K-Pop — is live, and there are reasons to think that the government has taken a pleasant result.

Let’s begin by examining the two distinct ways that younger people in North Korea are depicted.

In the government’s version, the children are doting and obedient, aspiring above all else to make the affection and approval of Marshall Kim Jong Un. The Kim dynasty and the state media would make the world think that its young people are unquestionably committed to the ideals of socialism, juche ideology, and the Kim dynasty.

A recent Rodong Sinmun article showcased a glossy propaganda scene rife with symbolism: children at Mangyongdae Schoolchildren’s Palace “burst into cheers full of great excitement” when Kim Jong Un arrived. For his enjoyment, children danced and sang “full of excitement and joy” in their own costumes.

This performance reportedly reflects the determination of the children to become “young revolutionaries and patriots … guaranteeing that the Juche revolution is full of vitality”. Kim Jong Un served as a representative of” the mightiness of Korean-style socialism” while the “bright laughing of children” served as a representation of his role as the “benevolent father.”

But other sources reveal that not all children are as devoted as the regime wants us to believe. When they watched a well-known South Korean drama called” Full House,” North Korean children first encountered a song called” Three Bears.” Youngsters adapted the lyrics of the song to insult the Kim regime, singing:” Grandpa bear]Kim Il Sung ] is fat, papa bear]Kim Jong Il ] is also fat, and baby bear]Kim Jong Un] is foolish”.

Representatives from the Socialist Youth League were dispatched to catch and discipline students found singing the song or possessing foreign media in response. This was in 2015. However, traditional patterns are sadly lost. In 2022, Youth League monitors were again tasked with busting students for singing mocking, satirical versions of revolutionary North Korean songs and embracing South Korean music.

In fact, since a famine in the middle of the 1990s broke the social contract between the state and society, millennials have been referred to as the jangmadang ( market ) generation because of their resistance to state ideology and proclivity for adopting South Korean fashion, slang, and even dating culture.

This version of freewheeling youngsters conflicts with the version described by Kim Jong Un and broadcast in state media. Which is the truth, then? A careful analysis suggests that these conflicting characterizations represent extreme ends of the spectrum and both fail to reflect the complex reality.

North Korea recently increased penalties for those who speak the language of South Korea, which suggests that the government is trying to keep an ideological hold on the populace. A new law is especially telling. The anti-reactionary thought law, which was passed in 2020 and amended in 2022, “describes South Korean movies, dramas, news, and other outside content ] as ] reactionary thought and culture.”

Those caught with the banned content are subjected to heightened punishments: six years to life of reform through labor for consuming, and ten years or even death for importing or distributing.

Additionally, the law forbids the use of South Korean expressions like “older brother” and adding the honorific suffix “nim” to titles when addressing others. These phrasings are signifiers of South Korean influence that diminish the more stodgy and rigid North Korean values and conventions.

The law forbids” citizens from imitating puppet style ] South Korean intonation by raising and lengthening their intonationation obsequiously, lilting, and nauseatingly in aegyo speech.” Anyone who has watched South Korean movies or dramas knows what this is referring to.

While bribery and corruption have reduced the impact of previous crackdowns, this one is having a stronger impact: Video footage shows two teenage boys serving 12-years of hard labor in a show trial in front of hundreds of classmates for the crime of consuming South Korean media.

This is part of a larger trend that has its roots at the inception of Kim’s rule. In an effort to combat the flow of foreign media and information, Kim Jong Un oversaw the establishment of the Central 109 Inspection Command of The State Security Department ( now known as Group 109 ).

Since then, 85 % of respondents said that punishments are tougher now for consuming foreign media than they were under Kim Jong Il, according to a 2018 survey by the US Agency for Global Media.

According to a poll conducted by InterMedia of 350 refugees who left the nation between 2016 and 2018, two-thirds of North Koreans “personally experienced an inspection by Group 109.” North Korea ranked dead last in the 2023 World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders.

North Korean refugees provide the most reliable information on this subject, but sadly, the number of people who have escaped has dramatically decreased since the Covid border lockdown. Much information is therefore out of date. Only as the border opens, will we be able to better understand how things have changed recently.

North Korea’s not-so-radical youth

Analysis of other defector surveys paints a much more complex picture than the persistent presence of North Korean interest in foreign media, which suggests that North Koreans are largely rejecting the regime’s narratives and ideology in favor of more entertaining foreign alternatives.

In particular, the younger generation is overall more positive toward the regime, juche ideology, and Kim Jong Un compared with older cohorts, according to defector surveys conducted by Seoul National University ( SNU).

A higher proportion of North Korean defectors in their 20s and 30s viewed Kim Jong Un as the country’s most popular leader from 2011 to 2020 than their elders did. Twenty and 30-somethings were also less likely to report hearing criticism about the government and the leader compared with those in their forties, fifties, and sixties.

The young generation had less pride in juche in 2014 than the older generation. But that dynamic flipped in 2020: over half of the young respondents had” a lot” of or” some” pride in juche, while the majority of older respondents had” not much” or “none”.

What justifies these surprising discoveries? There are a few factors at play. First, the Kim regime has launched a youth loyalty initiative to win back from Kim Jong Un and the party.

Young people are a captive and malleable audience. The days of students are jam-packed with Kim family history and ideological training, labor mobilizations, organizational activities, and criticism sessions.

The exploits of Kim Il Sung, expounded in a massive eight-part memoir, are akin to a Homeric epic that is genuinely entertaining to North Korean students. According to North Korean refugee Jae Young Kim, the book is even more challenging to borrow from the library because of its popularity.

One North Korean refugee turned activist, Kang Chol Hwan, described his childhood perception of Kim Il Sung as a” Father Christmas” who gifted children sweets and school uniforms. This education gave Kang, who would later be sent to a political prison camp and then defect,” a wellspring of admiration and gratitude for our political leaders and in the willingness to sacrifice everything for them.”

The foreign media crackdown is another factor. Although there is conflicting evidence regarding whether or not consumption has decreased in recent years, former US special envoy for North Korean human rights Ambassador Robert King contends that the crackdown has discouraged “more casual use of foreign media.”

This ca n’t help but have knock-on effects. Consuming foreign information slowly but surely alters the viewpoint of the North Korean people. Those who consume foreign media tend to have more negative feelings about the North Korean government and its intentions, according to surveys conducted by Stephan Haggard and Marcus Noland for their book” Witness to Transformation: Refugee Insights into North Korea”.

Significantly, after Kim Jong Un’s increased crackdown on foreign media, survey respondents increased their likelihood of finding state media to be credible ( over 70 % ), while the percentage of skeptical people decreased to about 20 %.

The lack of disconfirming sources no doubt plays a role in youth’s perceptions. Consensusting foreign information has the effect of enhancing kinship ties between North and South. Nearly three-quarters of respondents said their perception of South Korea “improved a lot” after consuming South Korean media, according to a 2020 SNU survey.

Given that Kim Jong Un recently declared that North Korea would no longer pursue unification and labeled South Korea as the North’s “number one enemy,” the ability to improve South Korea’s image is especially relevant.

Finally, young people tend to have rose-colored glasses when looking at the government, compared with the older cohorts, because they have yet to spend any significant time in the sphere of North Korean life that tends to lead to the most antipathy towards the regime: the markets.

During Kim Jong Un’s rule, there has been a rise and remain high in the proportion of North Koreans who participate in the unofficial market economy, but there has been a steady decline in the proportion of respondents who participate in the official ( state ) economy. More significantly, only a tiny minority of respondents ( 13 % ) earn enough money per month to buy a single kilogram of rice from their state jobs, the SNU survey reveals.

This implies that the majority of people rely on market earnings for their household income, which places the state as a burden on their way of life rather than a resource. In fact, respondents spent an average of 20 % of their earnings on bribes and 46 % of people identified “bribes and crackdowns” as the greatest difficulty for their economic activity.

This explains why the older “money-making” generations in North Korea have resisted the regime. In contrast, the younger cohorts are busy with school and compulsory military service through their early 30s and therefore have yet to encounter the regime in this light.

Next steps

Despite Kim Jong Un’s severe crackdowns and harsh punishments, North Korean people remain interested in outside media. This presents a chance. Increasing the quantity and availability of foreign information inside North Korea will be crucial for:

• establishing a civil society, planting the seeds,
• challenging state propaganda that demonizes the outside world,
• educating people about their human rights in North Korea.
• increasing feelings of kinship with South Korea and
• creating conditions that can result in a long-term soft landing, making the peninsula a more stable and prosperous place for all Koreans.

It’s especially important to reach young North Koreans to counteract the Kim regime’s information blockade and loyalty campaign, which have proven surprisingly effective. The North Korean Human Rights Act of the United States authorizes funding for information programs.

The last iteration of the law authorized the government to spend$ 3 million per year to increase” the availability of sources of information not controlled by the Government of North Korea”. Although the law has bipartisan support, it expired in September 2022 and has not yet been reauthorized.

Reauthorization bills have been introduced multiple times, for example in the House by Congresswoman Young Kim (R-California ) and Congressman Ami Bera (D-California ) and in the Senate by Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida ) and Senator Tim Kaine (D-Virginia ), but each of these efforts have ultimately foundered.

The National Endowment for Democracy funded a number of innovative initiatives, many of which were based in South Korea and were led by North Korean refugees, in order to reach the North Korean people through radio news programs in 2021.

A focus on both content and method is required to enhance North Korea’s foreign media presence. It will only be possible to outcompete regime propaganda if the content succeeds in meeting the needs, gaining the trust, and provoking the curiosity of the North Korean people.

According to a 2019 survey by Unification Media Group, when asked what types of media North Koreans need the most, the most widely received response was “news about South Korean society” ( 41.5 % ), followed by “entertainment programs made in South Korea” ( 18 % ).

Radio broadcasts that feature North Korean defectors provide a familiar voice that North Koreans can relate to. Heavy-handed content that explicitly criticizes the regime is counterproductive because it resembles North Korean propaganda and poses a risk to any North Koreans who consume it.

On the other hand, entertaining and straightforward depictions of ordinary South Koreans going about their lives with the freedom to choose their own jobs and vote for their own government officials can be subtly radicalizing.

Actionable content, such as market prices and weather forecasts, can also help to establish a foundation of trust, allowing for the introduction of topics like universal human rights and civil society.

Content should also be differentiated for audiences, as in the case of VOA’s Korean targeting elites.

Also, methods for distributing information need to be rethought and revitalized. With the border largely sealed, the most effective way to inject information into the country is currently radio broadcasts. However, radio is impeded by signal jamming, and surveys indicate that the older generation favors radio.

Distributing the kind of content favored by the young, like hallyu pop music and K-dramas, is typically done manually over the border via memory sticks like USBs and micro SDs. Although overused, distributors can now make money from this method. However, it is dangerous and very risky. To get around this, innovative new concepts like utilizing satellite technology or decentralized mesh networks should be looked into.

In this game of cat and mouse with the authorities, the key is to replace old, discoverable methods with new, innovative ones faster than the regime can keep up. Each method must also be carefully examined to make sure it is simple to use, deployable, and protects end users from detection. A balance must also be struck to avoid provoking too forceful a response from the regime.

Conclusion

Kim Jong Un is aware that winning the hearts and minds of his country’s youth is a crucial step in ensuring the continued rule of his family. For now, Kim has the edge. However, if they play it right, outside actors who want to spread foreign media within North Korea, such as those from the US and South Korea, can win.

Doing so can help foster the rudiments of a civil society capable of seeing through the Kim regime’s lies and imagining a brighter future.

The Korea Society’s director of policy is also a professor at SUNY Stony Brook University and Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs. Chelsie Alexandre is the policy program officer at The Korea Society. At SUNY Stony Brook University, Alexander Tufto is a political science student.

First published by Pacific Forum, this article is republished with permission. Read the original here, complete with endnotes and charts.

Continue Reading