Forced to choose in a new technopolar order – Asia Times

Great power competition has spread beyond the realm of microchips, artificial intelligence ( AI), and quantum computing. It is no longer only conducted on battlefields.

The US and China are engaged in a fierce conflict to determine the structural framework of the 21st century in this emerging “technopolar” order, where command over advanced systems may determine the trajectory of global power.

The rules of the upcoming world order will be dictated by those who control the data, computing power, and associated supply stores. And in this rapidly changing new world order, smaller countries will increasingly be subject to pressure to choose their technological stances. &nbsp,

AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing are not just resources for financial advancement; instead, they are power bonuses that are shaping everything from global governance frameworks to military supremacy.

One of the most important areas in which international techno-politics is being played out is AI. There are American, Chinese, British, and European models, each with their own unique interpretations of the strategic principles surrounding AI.

Crucially, a country with AI supremacy will outshine rivals in intelligent defense systems, security, and decision-making.

The modern electronic economy’s essence is also made up of electronics. It would be inappropriate to refer to it as the “new crude” of the world economy, where cards are used to power everything from smartphones to fighter jet.

The major inquiry is: If the world is in the process of a new techno-global order, where industrial “haves” and “have-nots” may be categorized according to which bloc a state is aligned, where does this leave developing states that lack the home business base and know-how to protect against modern dependencies?

The US-China tech war is more than just a fight for economic dominance; it is also history’s most defining moment. The winner of this contest will influence the international system’s ideological trajectory, the structure of global security, and the rules of the digital era.

This is no longer a time when relying solely on market forces is sufficient. Due to concern about China’s rapidly developing and leapfrogging industries, technology alliances are already being discussed in Western capitals.

Today’s semiconductor supply chains are highly fragmented across multiple countries, in contrast to the Cold War, where US technological dominance was clear and largely self-sufficient.

The main suppliers of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, for instance, are Japan and the Netherlands. Advanced chip production is dominated by Taiwan and South Korea ( TSMC). India is emerging as a major player in the manufacturing of crucial technologies and AI development.

Washington is attempting to forge a web of strategic partnerships, creating a new tech alliance to stop Beijing’s rise, for its strategic imperatives.

This “alliance” is characterized by, but not limited to, the Dutch-Japanese agreement to halt exports of high-end semiconductor equipment to China, the Quad’s focus on cutting-edge and emerging technologies, and US-Taiwan and US-South Korea agreements to protect semiconductor supply chains.

However, it’s not that simple to contain China. The US attempted the same with Japan in the 1990s, but there are still differences today. Through trade diplomacy, market competition, and selective interventions, the US managed to halt Japan‘s technological development.

China does not adhere to the same rules as Japan, and it does not. China’s industrial policy is profoundly intertwined with the state-security apparatus, in contrast to Japan’s operation within the framework of the global Bretton Woods system.

In this way, China actively stocks AI hardware and semiconductor tools, strengthening its self-sufficiency strategy. Tech companies like SMIC and Huawei can compete for global markets and create cutting-edge technologies thanks to China’s state-driven business model, which has fueled rapid industrial growth.

China has a dominant position in key industries like solar energy and lithium-ion batteries because the US and its allies have failed to coordinate industrial policies. China is also well on its way to rule the world’s EV markets.

Without tech blocs, it’s simply impossible to vitiate China’s advancing technology. There will soon be the conundrum of a binary choice for small nations like Pakistan. Technology will no longer be the “global common” it was after the globalization boom in the 1990s.

Countries will increasingly be forced to align themselves with a particular technological order as a result of the intersection of technology and global politics. For this, they will have to put their own technology behind it in their respective economies and societies.

Many countries in Asia, the Middle East, and Europe, which are all treading a tightrope between the US and China, are already in a Catch-22 situation due to a zero-sum approach.

Other players, like the EU, France, and Britain, are present, but it’s likely that they will follow the US-led tech order rather than the Chinese one.

Pakistan’s technological outlook includes everything from defense equipment, space satellites, EVs, 4G and 5G networks, to daily-use electronics, which is increasingly reliant on advanced Chinese technology.

However, too firmly rooted in the Chinese tech camp could stifle or restrict access to new, emerging Western technology. Pakistan will need to contribute in terms of manpower, knowledge-innovation, or open markets, even if it chooses a side. &nbsp,

One thing is done to balance security ties between powerful countries, but another is done to balance technological reliance. It’s a brand-new geopolitical reality that will make fateful geopolitical decisions for Pakistan and others like it.

The Strategic Vision Institute in Islamabad employs research associate Hammad Waleed. He received a distinguished degree from Islamabad’s National Defense University, and he writes about international relations, conflict, emerging technologies, and public policy. He can be reached at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Mar-a-Lago Accord would end the dollar’s – and America’s – reign – Asia Times

The US Treasury market has a sell-off as a result of President Donald Trump’s numerous tax presentations, not the least of which was his decision to impose” Liberation Day” mutual tariffs on April 2.

The sell-off, which started on April 5, was largely caused by concerns about tariff-related prices and overly leveraged hedge funds facing percentage names. But most importantly, it demonstrated a rapid market acceptance that Trump is serious about implementing profoundly problematic economic laws.

Investors today think that anything is achievable under Trump, following the courage of the Liberation Day tariffs. The proposed” Mar-a-Lago Accord,” suggested by Stephen Miran, who is currently the head of Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers, stands out as probably the most destructive statement, even though it is currently unlikely to get implemented.

The valuation of the US dollar, which Miran believes is the biggest issue facing the country’s economy, may lead to an effort to address a Mar-a-Lago Accord, which had aim to increase the US trade deficit and increase production.

His approach would be to convert short-term US Treasuries held by foreign investors to long-term, non-tradable zero-coupon obligations at much lower inherent offer, which would be the equivalent of restructuring US sovereign debt. The outcome would be to lower the cost of funding for the US government as well as to decrease the money.

The proposal’s apparent simplicity contrasts with its possible disastrous effects, which would be a specialized default on US Treasury bonds. Bonds are currently regarded as the country’s safe asset and are currently denominated in the dollar, the reserve currency of the world.

The disruption a move like this could cause would be so wonderful that Miran’s plan has frequently been derided or dismissed, but Trump’s outrageously high mutual taxes, which are officially suspended for 90 time except for China, were not expected sometimes.

So, some buyers are concerned about a potential US king debt restructuring. In a possible Mar-a-Lago Accord model, it should be noted that US Treasury transfers are not the only way to weaken the dollar while lowering the US Treasury’s financing costs.

Miran even suggested that in collaboration with the Treasury, the Federal Reserve may help to lower the cost of loan servicing. Although story provides some examples, Iran did not fully understand how such coordination may lead to lower US Treasury yields.

In order to support US war efforts, the Federal Reserve specifically implemented obvious offer controls in 1942 and 1951. However, the global financial system of the day resembled nothing less than it does today, not just because of its interdependence, where foreign investors own close to 30 % of US royal debts, but also because there were therefore foreign exchange controls and funds account restrictions.

The senator and his economic team should have received a distinct wake-up call from the severity of the Liberation Day sell-off and Trump’s timely decision to halt most of the mutual tariffs to prevent the US economy’s collapse, including the abandoning of US Treasuries.

In theory, this should make Miran’s anticipated Mar-a-Lago Accord even less likely to ever become a reality. No one can deny Trump’s unpredictability, which makes him unaffordable.

Due to the exorbitant privilege of the US as the issuer of the world’s reserve currency, US Treasuries can no longer be regarded as the safest assets in the world. The US’s virtuous circle, which it uses foreign capital to finance its bloated fiscal deficit and trade imbalance, is now in danger. The dollar’s future as the world’s all-powerful reserve currency is also uncertain. &nbsp,

As the Treasuries sell-off demonstrated, firting with the dollar’s reserve currency role is even more dangerous than imposing sky-high tariffs on trading partners. In fact, assuming that market forces will still be allowed to operate freely in the future, market forces appear to be the best defense the US economy has against poorly thought-out and bad policies.

Bruegel’s senior research fellow, Alicia Garcia Herrero, is the country’s chief economist for Asia-Pacific, and a professor in the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s adjunct program.

Continue Reading

Why a US trade deal won’t be enough for India – Asia Times

The terms of reference for the upcoming free trade agreement negotiations were finalized this month between India and the US. A comprehensive strategy is anticipated to guide the strategy, which will improve industry access, tariff reductions and non-tariff barriers, and establish a strong, integrated supply chain. &nbsp,

Donald Trump’s” Liberation Day” tariffs on April 2 cannot be more confining for most nations, including India. The impact of Trump’s 26 % tax on India will not only negatively impact Indian exports, but it will also cast doubt on its ability to adapt rapidly to the fundamental realignment of global supply chains, which Trump’s punitive tariffs aim to necessarily change. &nbsp,

The volume of taxes and counter-tariffs has been reduced to mere amounts as the situation evolves. Hope for a quick, US-China deal to end business disputes have almost vanished.

The 90-day delay on reciprocal taxes is a break for most countries, except for China, which is subject to a staggering 145 % income. In this ambiguous environment, no government would dare to make long-term plans. International trade is being rewritten in some ways in real-time.

Two recent events have suggested that Trump’s position has slightly cooled. He put a 90-day delay to the higher mutual tariffs on the targeted nations so they could deal with the US on April 11 and then put it on hold until China. He made the announcement on April 13 that tariff deductions for items like phones, computers, and other electronics are available in the US.

Additionally, tariffs on pharmaceuticals are a looming risk, which, if implemented, do have a near-doom effect on India’s economy. According to some estimates, India could be liable to lose about 30 % of its exports to the US alone.

India should not rejoice at the fact that China ( 145 % ), Vietnam ( 46 % ), Thailand ( 36 % ), Cambodia ( 49 % ), Indonesia ( 32 % ) and Bangladesh ( 37 % ) have been hit with higher impositions. However, India has trade opportunities and a lot of market space in the form of semiconductors and machinery, among others.

India should see the new fact being imposed by Trump as both a challenge and an option. In some ways, India is in a similar position to 1991, when the land was practically forced to open up due to diminishing foreign exchange reserves.

The new US tax regime and its battle with China offer an opportunity to reevaluate opportunities, discover weak points, and deal with its monetary policy demons.

Many Indians are unrealistically putting their hopes on a landmark Bilateral Trade Agreement ( BTA ) with the US to rescue this mess. India’s strategy to free trade agreements, while faced with an extremely mercantilist global trading system, will still be supported by its multi-vector international policy and its unwavering support for a multi-polar world.

India may now think betrayed by the US after what transpired following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attend to the US in February of this year, despite the absence of a public demonstration of dissention.

During his check-out,” Mission 500,” which aimed to double bilateral trade to US$ 500 billion by 2030, was discussed and discussed. In that regard, a determination was made to finalize the second stage of a mutually advantageous BTA by the fall of 2025.

Trump officially criticized India for being a “tariff prince” and a “big perpetrator” of trade relations just before announcing the new mutual tax government on April 2. This is in contrast to what he has been saying for a while.

India courted the US in the wake of that visit and the” Liberation Day” price announcement, signaling its commitment to US energy imports and serious defense talks with Washington.

India hastily eliminated the 6 % online advertising income and cut taxes on solar panels, luxury cars, bourbon whiskey, and a few other items in preparation for the BTA. Elon Musk’s Starlink was also suggested by India that it might be approved in India. Despite all those early concessions, India, like most other countries, continued to be subject to the reciprocal and baseline tariffs.

A trade agreement, in Trump’s opinion, is an instrument to improve self-reliance and shift the balance of trade. The US is currently pressuring India to open its politically sensitive agricultural and dairy sectors in trade negotiations.

The US and India also have a number of ticklish issues, including stringent approval standards for genetically modified products, strict licensing, and enforcement of intellectual property rights. &nbsp,

India’s response has been more or less predictable. It will almost certainly not produce dairy and agricultural products, giving itself a bargaining chip for future negotiations. India will likely agree to increase the imports of US-made defense equipment and energy products to combat the negative trade balance.

In industries like pharmaceuticals and autos, where it already enjoys low costs and a strong manufacturing base, it might even consider 0 % tariff. Beyond this, it’s difficult to see India giving in to any more concessions.

However, India might face difficulties from rival nations that are also dealing with higher US tariffs, such as China, Vietnam, Thailand, and others. China has reacted by imposing similarly high counter-tariffs, but Vietnam has reacted by signaling it will drop all tariffs to 0 % in order to reach a trade agreement with the US. &nbsp,

A senior Vietnamese official, who was recently on an official trip to the US, pledged to start negotiations for a free trade agreement and the purchase of US defense supplies. Additionally, he made an announcement about Vietnam’s intention to purchase$ 300 million worth of Boeing aircraft for its VietJet commercial airline. The US tariffs are undoubtedly bargaining chips.

India’s low dependence on exports of goods may seem advantageous in its negotiations with the US, but because of Vietnam’s precedent-setting commitment to 0 % tariffs on all US imports, India should be prepared for US expectations for a similar deal.

Given the length of these negotiations so far with the UK, EU, and US in particular, India should at best be cautiously optimistic about outcomes, especially given that ongoing trade talks with the US did not protect it from Trump’s high reciprocal tariffs.

As a general rule, an emerging market like India shouldn’t be concerned about a respectable trade deficit as long as it benefits from a BTA, boosts its exports, overall trade, and introduces new technologies and investments. However, India needs to be aware that a free trade agreement on its own won’t address India’s structural issues. It is entirely up to India to address them both at once.

Thus, India should take advantage of Trump’s tariff crisis as a unique opportunity to unilaterally lower global tariffs to increase competitiveness. This in turn will encourage the flow of superior foreign technologies, which will improve productivity and quality and boost national exports, especially those from emerging industries. Only then will India be able to take advantage of the opportunities Trump’s global supply chain disruptions offer.

Will India seize the opportunity, is the debatable question? Or will it once more go missing? How successfully India maneuvers the looming, negative effects of Trump’s tariffs depend not only on how quickly it negotiates a bilateral free trade agreement with the US, but also on how other nations bargain with the US over tariffs.

The key to a successful FTA with the US is to conclude, but the bigger question for India is how quickly it can increase its manufacturing capacity, adopt smart technologies, train skilled workers, construct modern logistical infrastructure, and pass progressive regulatory changes that can adapt to newly emerging global value chain alignments.

Only when global supply chains actually feed and integrate into Indian manufacturing can India count on being well-positioned to become a major global manufacturing and export hub in the upcoming years and ultimately a net-net Trump trade war winner.

Raghu Gururaj, an Indian Foreign Service officer, is a retired ambassador. He has his own opinions expressed here.

Continue Reading

SAP announces new leadership: Liher Urbizu to head SAP Southeast Asia as Verena Siow takes new APAC role

  • In APAC, Siow will be in charge of sky growth and corporate business development.
  • Urbizu will be in charge of SAP Southeast Asia’s strategy, operations, and user success.

Verena Siow, Regional Business Suite Leader for SAP Asia Pacific (left) and Liher Urbizu as President and Managing Director for SAP Southeast Asia

Liher Urbizu has been named president and managing director for SAP Southeast Asia ( SEA ). Urbizu takes Verena Siow’s place as the Regional Business Suite Leader for SAP Asia Pacific ( APAC ), taking her new position. Both officials bring decades of experience to their positions, strengthening SAP’s continued commitment to client success and advancing its sky and AI development plan.

Urbizu will be in charge of SAP’s Southeast Asia business system, which includes Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, and emerging Indochina areas. He will concentrate on aiding local businesses in promoting the development of a modern economy that is fueled by AI, cloud, and data.

Urbizu has held a number of management positions at SAP, most just as APAC’s Chief Business Officer. He has worked for SAP for 25 years as a client, partner, and administrative. Among the significant roles are the world head of partner success service, the head of providers Asia Pacific &amp, Japan, the chief operating officer for Japan, and the team’s Managing Director, who led the team to several accomplishments and awards.

Urbizu stated in his remarks regarding his visit,” Southeast Asia was my career’s launchpad within the SAP ecosystem. I’m excited to return to lead this powerful market unit, which focuses on enabling our customers to use AI and SAP’s cutting-edge business software solutions to achieve tangible business results. I strongly believe that businesses of all sizes and sectors will be able to invent and prosper in the digital-first era by coordinating our technology with the region’s growth goals.

Southeast Asia is at the forefront of AI adoption, according to Simon Davies, chairman of SAP Asia Pacific. Verena Siow has made a significant contribution to SAP SEA over the past few years, and I’m confident that her remarkable leadership may help us perform our strategy and promote strong cloud momentum in the APAC region.

Urbizu’s broad leadership experience in Asia will be beneficial for the SEA team during its second phase of expansion. With a proven track record of leading high-impact clubs, Leder combines a thorough understanding of our clients ‘ evolving business needs. He will play a crucial role in accelerating our fog and AI initiatives as the new leader and managing director of Southeast Asia, making sure businesses in SEA can fully utilize SAP’s innovation to solve their most pressing company issues.

Verena Siow, who has worked for SAP for more than 13 years, leaves her position as President and Managing Director of Southeast Asia to be Regional Business Suite Leader for SAP Asia Pacific. She did lead cloud growth and corporate business development in her new position, focusing on ensuring a smooth experience for SAP’s cloud customers, from demand generation to renewals, in line with the company’s mission of delivering steady and extraordinary outcomes across all markets.

Siow remarked,” Over the past five years, the Southeast Asia team has demonstrated remarkable resilience and consistent success, anchored by our customers ‘ trust in SAP’s solutions and innovations. As SAP continues to offer the best cloud solutions of the future and expand its presence in Asia, I’m excited to bring my experience to the wider APAC region.

She continued,” I look forward to helping customers, both in Southeast Asia and across APAC, continue to accelerate innovation and add value to their transformation journeys,” she continued.

Continue Reading

US readies huge tariffs on solar cells from Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand and Cambodia | FinanceAsia

In a further escalation of the US trade war, the US Department of Commerce has placed antidumping duties ( AD ) and countervailing duties ( CVD ) on crystalline photovoltaic cells ( solar cells ) arriving into the US from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, according to an April 21 announcement.  

¬ Capitol Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Stupidity researchers: Trump’s policies not just dumb but stupid – Asia Times

Before he stepped down as Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau called Donald Trump’s tax laws “very silly. ” This might be an exact description of numerous Trump management policies— but the more honestly correct word is “stupid. ”

In fact, Québec’s largest newspaper, Le Journal de Montréal, published a front-page photo of Trump in early February with the word “stupid ” in 350-point type. Some may call this an opinion, but the knowledge of foolishness tells us that it ’s more of a description.

New research has produced a terse label for the ill calculated activities of decision-makers: stupidity.

This is not easy name-calling, but a sensation that comprises damage and features a set of actions that are either illegal recognizably destructive, or look thus at odds with any sensible course of action that it seems a hidden agenda was become involved.

Foolishness that causes everyone to reduce

According to the sperm and interpersonal view of human stupidity by Carlo Cipolla, the later Roman economic historian, relationships fall into four types:

    Intelligent conversation that is beneficial to all – a positive-sum activity like Scottish scientist Adam Smith’s notion of success through specialization and trade;

  1. Helpless interaction that results in a loss in a zero-sum game;
  2. Bandit interaction that results in a gain in zero-sum game;
  3. Stupid interactions that cause all parties to suffer losses.

Free trade is based on an intelligent positive-sum interaction. Trump’s transactional zero-sum view is that for every winner there is a loser.

He apparently does n’t understand that tariffs are only successful if other countries don’t retaliate. But other countries do retaliate, and as the world is now witnessing, the resulting trade war can decimate the global economy.

Trump’s protectionist measures aimed at boosting the US economy can therefore be considered “stupid ” interactions that risk deepening and lengthening an economic depression.

Stupidity as recognizable actions

Modern-day researchers have also identified three recognizable sets of actions embodying stupidity:

Confident ignorance involves people taking risks without having the necessary skills to deal with them. It’s not just being ignorant of one’s ignorance — explained by the Dunning-Kruger effect— but being self-assured despite contrary evidence.

Trump may know what he does not know, so he delegated many tasks to Tesla founder Elon Musk and trade tariff architect Pete Navarro, both of whom seem to possess no such awareness.

Absent-minded failure means people knew the right thing to do but were not paying sufficient attention to avoid doing something stupid. Organizations create agendas, but if issues don’t reach a point where they seriously impact the organization’s objectives, they are ignored.

An example: the recent US strikes against Yemeni Houthis. US officials ignored critical security components by sharing information about their plans over unsecure connections and with a member of the media.

Lack of control means that autocratic decision-makers compromise their organizations by failing to accept objections from those charged with implementing the leader’s preconceived plans.

Such autocratic decision-makers may select biased information to support their proposals. People working under those leaders either buy into efforts to selectively use information, limit alternatives and execute these preconceived plans or they leave the organization (either voluntarily or not ).

In the US, witness the firing of Justice Department pardon attorney Elizabeth Oyer. She failed to support restoring gun rights to actor Mel Gibson, who had been convicted of domestic violence in 2011. Gibson’s pardon was reportedly based on his personal relationship with the president.

Types of stupidity

Organizational researchers have used the term functional stupidity to describe those who refuse to use their intellectual capacities when making decisions and then avoid justification for their actions. This allows group members to quickly execute routine functions without much thought.

Dysfunctional stupidity is a lack of organizationally supported reflection, reasoning and justification. Organizations fail to use intellectual resources to process knowledge or question norms or claims of knowledge when confronted with new or non-routine decisions. By blocking communications, muffling criticism and squelching doubts, organizations ensure adherence to superiors ’ edicts.

One Trump administration example is the unquestioning permission given to allow the Department of Government Efficiency ( DOGE ), headed by Musk, to gain access to a wide array of government data.

It can take the combined efforts of organizational officials on multiple levels to maintain stupidity.

Individually, stupidity is reinforced by ignoring crucial information because of a need for a rapid response.

Consequently, quick decisions and shortcuts made by individuals result in negative outcomes. An example would be the Trump administration ’s apparent need to appear to find cost savings quickly to allow for tax cuts, overriding a more logical approach to find ways to achieve those savings without gutting legally mandated services.

Organizationally, stupidity is reinforced because organizations limit acceptable alternative behaviors when they cannot process all available information. Data are restricted, controls are tightened and organization officials fall back to using previously well-learned responses in their comfort zones. Inexperienced decision-makers fall back on uninformed assumptions, or no assumptions at all.

Witness Trump’s “reciprocal” trade tariffs that battered financial markets worldwide, finally causing him to hit the pause button. No tariffs were calculated using current tariff rates, while some were based on American trade deficits with other countries. Other tariffs seem to be based on no rationale at all.

Stupidity as a hidden agenda?

Some actions that appear stupid may simply hide a hidden agenda. When the Trump administration erroneously detains and deports anyone under the Alien Enemies Act, is it an accident – or is it a way to instill the fear that authorities can detain, mistreat and deport anyone without due process at any point?

Many of the actions being taken by the Trump administration appear stupid. Tariffs, for example, represent a loss — a transactionally negative sum game.

Trump’s decisions exhibit confident ignorance, absent-minded failure and lack of control. They also show dysfunctional stupidity as Trump officials seemingly refuse to use their full intellectual resources. Stupidity is also being reinforced through unfounded assumptions. Is this all hiding a secret agenda?

“You can’t fix stupid, ” so the saying goes. But having capable administrators in place while other branches of government exercise their constitutionally mandated oversight role might dampen some of the Trump administration ’s stupidity.

Jerry Paul Sheppard is an associate professor of business administration at Simon Fraser University.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Indonesia bracing for flood of rerouted Chinese exports – Asia Times

JAKARTA – At Indo Intertex, a great textiles and garments trade show staged this quarter in Jakarta, the richness and disagreement of Indonesia-China industry were on full screen.

“The business is not good, all knows that, ” said Hery, who sells textile manufacturing equipment to regional companies and, like some Indonesians, goes by one title. “There’s no wealth, probably because there are so many products coming in from China. ”

Behind him stood a great knitting equipment produced by Hengye Mach, a Chinese firm producing the models for which Hery works as a local agent.

At the show, Taiwanese firms occupied an apparent bulk of the hundreds of stalls touting models for various textile-producing processes – spinning, dyeing, printing, weaving and finishing – and selling fabrics ranging from nylon to cotton to silk.

To be sure, Indonesian manufacturers were complaining that waves of low-cost Chinese goods – often smuggled into the country to avoid high tariffs – were driving them to the wall even before US President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day ” announcement of reciprocal tariffs, including a punitive 145 % tax on all Chinese goods.

But some now worry floods of cheap Chinese imports, once destined for the US, will quickly destroy regional markets, forcing underdevelopment across a wide expanse of businesses, not least the nation’s classic textiles.

Managing this is a delicate issue for Indonesia. China is Indonesia’s largest trade partner. In 2024, Indonesia imported US$ 72. 7 billion worth of goods from China – mainly telecoms equipment, computers and machinery, according to Indonesia’s Central Statistics Agency ( BPS). In turn, it exported and exported$ 62. 4 billion to China– mainly coal, palm oil and ferroalloys.

China is also a key partner and investor in a number of strategic sectors in Indonesia, including infrastructure, nickel and electric vehicles. BYD is already building a factory in Indonesia.

In June last year, then-Trade Minister Zukifli Hasan announced plans to impose tariffs of up to 100-200 % on a variety of Chinese goods from China, including textiles and ceramics.

The idea was hastily shot down by other ministers who were wary of upsetting China, inviting retaliation from one of the nation’s leading investors. But local calls for protection from cheap Chinese goods have persisted.

Those calls have come from the textiles sector in particular, one of the nation’s largest domestic employers.

They became more pronounced after major producer Sritex declared bankruptcy amid the closure of several other factories that could compete on price with China ’s cheaper wares.

Chinese goods are often blamed with claims of rampant smuggling to evade the hefty duties Indonesia imposes on such goods. In December, President Prabowo Subianto, who has pushed the government to save Sritex, took a hard line on the issue.

“Textile smuggling threatens our textile industry, threatens the lives of hundreds of thousands of our workers, ” he declared. “ But if it threatens the lives of the Indonesian people, if necessary, we will sink those [smuggling ] ships! ” he said firmly.

If only it were so simple. Before Prabowo took office, former Coordinating Minister Luhut Binsar Pandjitan revealed a Chinese proposal to establish new Chinese textile factories in Kertajati, Majalengka, with the potential to employ 108,000 workers.

An apparent separate proposal led by Chinese investors sought to establish textile factories across Subang, Karawant, Brebes, Solo and Sukhoharjo, spanning the entire textile production chain from midstream to upstream processes and with an eye on exports.

Whether Chinese-owned factories in Indonesia will be able to elude the 145 % tariffs on Chinese goods is an open question as Trump intensifies his trade war by calling on nations to impose their own “secondary tariffs ” on Chinese producers.

Most of the goods that Indonesia exports to the US are low-end manufactured goods. In 2024, Indonesia exported$ 26. 3 billion worth of products to the US, according to BPS. Manufactured products like electronics, garments and footwear made up the majority of those shipments.

Demand for such goods in China from Indonesia is fairly low. Indeed, that same year, while Indonesia exported some$ 70. 7 billion worth of goods to China, 90. 9 % were commodities like iron and steel, coal, nickel, palm oil, paper pulp, foodstuffs and wood, vegetable and animal products.

All this may complicate China ’s attempts to seize upon America’s aggressive trade demands to position itself as a reliable and lucrative alternative market.

“ In the face of shocks to global order and economic globalization, China and Malaysia will stand with countries in the region to combat the undercurrents of geopolitical confrontation, as well as the counter-currents of unilateralism and protectionism, ” declared Xi at a dinner with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. “Together, we will safeguard the bright prospects of our Asian family, ” he added.

Indonesia, as the largest country in the region, forms part of these plans. While Xi did not visit Jakarta during this three-country swing through the region, he spoke with President Prabowo, who has already visited China twice since his election last year.

On April 21, China ’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi said at a press conference with his Indonesian counterpart that China and Indonesia should oppose “any form ” of unilateralism and trade protectionism.

The two sides should jointly accelerate regional economic integration and maintain the stability of industrial chains and supply chains, he said.

But as Indonesia looks to deal with Trump’s tariff shock, China may not be its partner of choice. The idea that China ’s tariff troubles could ultimately be Indonesia’s gain is already filtering down, despite the reciprocal 36 % Indonesian goods now face.

Mari Pangestu, a veteran technocrat newly appointed as the president ’s Special Envoy for International Trade and Multilateral Cooperation, cited Japan, South Korea and Australia as the best target markets to absorb Indonesian goods usually sold to America.

Meanwhile, negotiations for a trade deal with the European Union seem to be gathering new momentum, talks that have stalled on various contentious issues ranging from palm oil cultivation techniques to resource nationalism since 2016.

There has even been some talk that Ind-nesia might join the Trans-Pacific Partnership– an 11-country trade pact including a cluster of Southeast Asian countries alongside Japan, Australia and Canada.

With regard to China, however, the focus has been different. Looking to reassure pressured local businesses, Pangetsu has said trade liberalization measures, when implemented, will be accompanied by plans to improve local anti-dumping laws, with the implicit target being Chinese goods.

Pangetsu has suggested Indonesia could actually benefit from the trade war by encouraging companies manufacturing for the US market to relocate from China to Indonesia.

Back at the textile expo, Kasikin, an independent wholesaler, is already thinking along these lines.

“Since the pandemic, our exports have been small, ” he reflected. But “ I heard from a friend in this trade war America wants to hit China. There could be a profit for Indonesia – reindustrialization. China could be forced to open factories here. ”

Continue Reading

Trump tariff shockwaves already buffeting Asian shores – Asia Times

TOKYO – The unexpected brake in South Korea’s export leaves little doubt about the degree to which Asia is in harm’s means amid Donald Trump’s tax anger.
 
In the first 20 weeks of April, South Korea’s outside shipping fell 5. 2 % year on year — the mirror image of the 5. 5 % rise for the entire month of March. US-bound imports plunged by 14. 3 % in the first 20 weeks of April.

It’s an first view of the credit damage to occur as the most protectionist US president in more than a century mountains Asia’s export-reliant markets. And it could be an sign of greater-than-feared problems to occur.
 
South Korea often acts as an early-warning method for international tone items. Its huge, empty market is on the front lines of high-tech trade sectors prone to zigs and zags in need patterns. And at the time, South Korea is signaling that the Trump 2. 0 age is about to do serious harm to economy from China to Indonesia. And the US, to.
 
There are also doubts that items are about to get even more chaotic as Trump aims his revenge-tour indignation at the US Federal Reserve, America’s most respected organization worldwide.
 
Trump 1. 0 definitely mixed it up with Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Shortly after Trump’s hand-picked Fed president took the helm in February 2018, Trump had buyer’s grief. He criticized Powell early and often, yet mulling ways to remove him.
 
This day, Trump means activity. Along with calling Powell a “loser ” and “Mr. Too Late, ” Trump is making clear that he might fire Powell at any moment. That a leader is only fire the Fed’s head for “cause” is n’t slowing Trump World over.
 
Does cratering world marketplaces give this White House wait? The S& P 500 fell another 2. 4 % on Monday, extending this year’s decline to 12. 3 %. And on the same day, The Wall Street Journal ’s newspaper website dubbed it “The Fire Jerome Powell Market Rout. ”
 
“Were Powell to be fired, the first reaction would be a huge shot of uncertainty into financial businesses, and the most dramatic jump to the return from US resources that it is possible to imagine, ” says Michael Brown, a senior research planner at buying services firm Pepperstone. “Lower, significantly lower, securities; Treasuries sold across the board; and, the money falling off a cliff. ”
 
The Fed’s much-vaunted freedom coming under threat “would notice investors across the globe selling every one US-based asset that they have, and also poses the truly terrifying prospect of upending the whole way in which the global financial system operates. If this were to happen, then the reserve status of the dollar, and the value of Treasuries, would be wiped out, probably forever in both cases. ”
 
Brown speaks for many, though, when he worries the damage “might already be done. ”
 
Krishna Guha, vice chairman of Evercore ISI, adds that “risk to Fed independence is negative for all major US asset classes and provides a partial foretaste of what might come if President Trump – who again tweeted his demand for preemptive Fed rate cuts – were to actually try to fire Powell. ”
 
Guha notes that “we still think, more likely than not, Trump will not actually try to fire Powell and will instead blame him for the tariff-led downturn ahead. But the risk is enough to move markets. ”
 
It’s hardly promising that “the price of gold registered another record high today, overcoming yet another periodic round of profit-taking by some tactical traders, ” observes Mohamed El-Erian, chief advisor at Allianz. “This, as it benefits from the tailwind of slow and steady diversification away from the dollar by some foreign central banks and others. ”
 
Given today’s “extremely rare ” combination of lower US bond prices, stocks and the dollar sliding simultaneously, as Guha puts it, the reaction to Powell’s firing could be greater than markets understand. These dynamics, he says, “indicate higher risk premia is being required to hold US assets. Trump moving to axe Powell “would manifest in a shift from recession to stagflation trades. ”
 
When 2025 began, few in Asia had the “Trump trade” being to sell America on their Bingo cards. But as this stark reality sets in, the best-laid plans of policymakers from Seoul to Beijing to Tokyo are being upended in real time.
 
Korean officials are as disoriented as any as international chaos collides with political uncertainty at home. Yoon Suk Yeol’s leaving the presidency on April 11, post-impeachment, merely signaled the beginning of a political power struggle in Asia’s fourth-biggest economy ahead of the June 3 election.
 
This vacuum could n’t be timed any worse. South Korea, notes Frederic Neumann, chief Asia economist at HSBC, faces “sputtering ” growth drivers both externally and internally, adding to the risk that Korean GDP “stalled ” in the first quarter. Already, Neumann says, Trump’s tariffs are “pulling down GDP growth and investment. ”
 
South Korea, Neumann says, “will continue to face headwinds for the remainder of the year from likely slowing growth in key economies, including the United States, Europe, and China. ”
 
Fitch Ratings analyst Heakyu Chang observes that the “cyclical and structural challenges faced by Korea’s competitive and evolving banking system include domestic political turmoil and a global trade war, which have hindered business investment and weakened consumption since the fourth quarter of 2024, as well as subdued economic growth, falling interest rates, high leverage and an aging population. ”
 
These are the pre-existing conditions Korea carried into Trump’s trade war.   Following a 10 % tax on imports of metals, Trump slapped a 25 % tariff on autos and another 10 % on all other shipments. Korea faces a 25 % reciprocal tariff once Trump’s 90-day cooling-off period ends.
 
That risk has Korean Finance Minister Choi Sang-mo and Industry Minister Ahn Duk-geun in Washington this week to begin trade negotiations with Trump World.

The auto tariff is already hitting Korea hard. Last year, Trump’s economy accounted for nearly half of Korea’s US$ 71 billion of vehicle exports. “The overall export momentum is weak, with growth slowing in April due to deteriorating trade conditions after expanding slightly in March, ” Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong told reporters last week.
 
Japan has its own headwinds to overcome, making life miserable for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda.
 
The only thing falling faster than Ishiba’s approval rating — 27. 6 % at last check — are the odds that the BOJ will be raising interest rates in the months ahead. Just a week ago, many economists thought the BOJ would tighten again at its April 30-May 1.
 
But “the deteriorating outlook for the economy throws a wrench into its rate hike plans, ” says Stefan Angrick, Head of Japan at Moody’s Analytics.
 
One big problem for trade-reliant Japan is the haphazard way in which Trump is conducting his tariff policies. Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, says that the “tariffs have been implemented in a way that has not been effective, and there is now a 90 % chance of what can be called a voluntary trade reset recession. ”
 
The yen, meanwhile, is up nearly 11 % so far this year, threatening Japan’s export engine. “We believe dollar weakness will continue, ” says Win Thin, a managing director at Brown Brothers Harriman.
 
A big fear in Tokyo is that, along with trashing the Fed’s credibility, Trump might move to weaken the dollar. Japan, says Citigroup currency strategist Osamu Takashima, would be a top target if Trump World engineers a dollar devaluation.
 
“At this point, we do not see a ‘Mar-a-Lago Accord ’ as a concrete risk, ” Takashima notes. “However, countries such as Japan, which have sizable foreign currency reserves and whose currency is undervalued, would tend to be the target in this case. ”
 
Overall, Angrick says, “the BOJ’s path just got a lot trickier. The deteriorating outlook for the economy throws a wrench into its rate hike plans. We still think the bank will press ahead with a rate hike in June, unless the economy takes a sharper turn south. But the broader picture has flipped. After months of worrying that the BOJ might fall behind the curve on hikes, the bigger risk now is that it tightens into a downturn. Buckle up. ”
 
Then there’s China. Last week, President Xi Jinping’s government agreed to sit down with Trump’s trade negotiators with a few preconditions. So far, Team Xi has rebuffed Trump’s demands for a series of anticipatory concessions. China also goes in armed with a solid 5. 4 % year-on-year growth rate in the first quarter.
 
Team Xi has demonstrated it ’s willing to live with considerable pain to avoid giving away the store to Trump’s White House. China has considerable fiscal and monetary space to support Asia’s biggest economy, even with Trump hiking tariffs on all Chinese goods to 145 %.

Beijing is also proving to be a worthier sparring partner than Trump probably expected. Case in point: reports that Beijing is prodding trading partners not to cut bilateral trade deals with Washington or slap “secondary tariffs ” on imports coming from specific countries with close China ties.

China, meanwhile, has steadily redirected its trade away from the US to Southeast Asia, Global South nations and Europe.
 
But the “damage from the trade war will show up in the macro data next month, ” says Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, adding that the “high frequency indicators suggest exports have slowed sharply in the region. ”
 
That’s why economist Lisheng Wang at Goldman Sachs thinks the “urgency for more policy easing is on the rise and fiscal expansion will likely do most of the heavy lifting to stabilize growth, though this should be still insufficient to fully offset the severe external shocks. ”
 
There’s also a question about whether slowing growth among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations economies and the rest of the Global South might complicate China ’s export diversification strategy. Trump-generated shockwaves are coming for these economies, too. So are higher global interest rates as Trump meddles with the Fed and his tariffs provoke the so-called “bond vigilantes ” to act.
 
East Asia’s economic miracle was born of – and sustained by – exports to the West. Though China has made important strides in weaning itself off the US consumer, the transition won’t necessarily be smooth. Losing US export markets will change dynamics for everything from local consumption to tourism to the health of banks for Beijing and other governments across Asia.

“China’s economic policy challenges, including its efforts to counter deflationary pressure and control financial leverage, will be heightened by the intensifying trade war with the US, potentially influencing issuer credit ratings, ” says Fitch analyst Duncan Innes-Ker.

Innes-Ker notes that “we believe domestic demand is likely to become the key driver of China ’s growth again and domestic deflationary pressures may be exacerbated. This reinforces our belief the authorities will deploy sustained fiscal stimulus to support growth, weakening public finances. ”

With Korea flashing red, Japan slowing down and China ’s exports in unprecedented jeopardy, the Trump 2. 0 shockwaves are only just beginning in Asia.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading