BYD overtakes Tesla: implications for global investors

Elon Musk’s Tesla, a trailblazer and industry leader in the electric vehicle industry, has been dethroned for the first time by Chinese manufacturer BYD as the top-selling EV manufacturer worldwide. &nbsp,

A closer look at the broader implications for international investors ‘ involvement in China in 2024 is required in light of this change in dynamics, which is characterized by BYD recording higher sales than Tesla in the previous quarter.

Tesla’s quick ascent to fame in the EV industry has come to be associated with creativity, cutting-edge technology, and Elon Musk-like leadership. &nbsp,

But, BYD’s new ascent to the top spot in EV sales gives the sector a fresh perspective. Although Tesla has been a leader, BYD’s success highlights the rising global demand for electric cars, particularly in China, the largest automarket in the world.

BYD’s success can be attributed to its proper focus on the EV industry, which makes use of its power engineering experience and a wide range of products, including electric cars and trucks in addition to passenger cars.

The company’s comprehensive strategy for electric freedom has been well received by both consumers and businesses, putting BYD at the top of the global EV business.

The growth of international buyers ‘ interest in China is one significant consequence of BYD’s surpassing of Tesla. &nbsp,

A positive culture has been created for home businesses like BYD to prosper as a result of the Chinese government’s dedication to promoting the green market and its strong policy support for the EV industry. &nbsp,

Buyers are likely to become more interested and confident in allocating funds to the Chinese market as they see the success of Taiwanese companies in the world market.

Beijing’s visible commitment to leading the world in electric vehicles is consistent with efforts to make the transition to environmentally friendly and sustainable transportation. &nbsp,

Chinese automakers are extremely expanding their footprint in foreign markets, opening up new opportunities for investors looking to gain exposure to the rapidly expanding EV industry. The government’s influence in the sector is not limited to local consumption.

Additionally, BYD’s success features a larger trend in Chinas ‘ technical skills and its ability to compete with recognized international players. In addition to catching up to their American counterparts, Chinese businesses are even redefining market dynamics through innovation.

China’s status as a formidable power in research, development, and technology is challenged by this change, which also challenges the conventional view of the nation as an industrial hub.

The changing panorama of China’s EV market emphasizes the significance of growth for international buyers. &nbsp,

Investors must carefully weigh the risks and benefits associated with allocating money to Chinese assets as the Chinese industry matures and presents compelling expense opportunities. While there is still a chance for high profits, it is crucial to comprehend the regulatory environment, market relationships, and company-specific factors.

It is apparent in my opinion that BYD’s overtaking Tesla as the best-selling electric vehicle manufacturer in the world signals a significant change in global automotive industry dynamics, which investors will notice. &nbsp,

I think it will probably pique more people’s attention in funding Chinese property this year.

Nigel Green is the CEO and founder of the deVere&nbsp Group. @nigeljgreen on Twitter, follow him.

Continue Reading

Commentary: Hong Kong’s economy struggles to get back on its feet

HONG KONG: Following COVID-19 at the start of 2023, Hong Kong was one of the last states in the world to resume. The ensuing financial treatment was softer and short-lived than anticipated. The city may not regain its pre-pandemic luster due to a combination of fundamental and cyclical factors, such as geopolitical unrest and global monetary policy.

Hong Kong’s personal use increased throughout the year, but imports and exports remained subpar. Tourism and investment investments have also been underwhelming. Visitor visitors were only 65 % of their 2018 level nine months after the opening. The commodity markets in Hong Kong are in similar challenging situations.

Personal property prices briefly increased at the start of the year but quickly lost momentum and fell in the second half, falling by about 5 % from year to date. Even as the S&amp, P 500 in the United States increased by about 25 % the same year, the Hang Seng Index fell by more than 15 % in 2023 and appears to be decoupled from the global market.

In the first quarter of 2023, Hong Kong stocks reached a four-year small with an average business of just US$ 14 billion. Problems that Hong Kong has lost its luster as an global economic center were raised when money raised from initial public offerings cratered to a 20-year low during the same time period.

In light of this, the government reduced its most recent quarterly GDP forecast from over 4.5 percent to just 3.2 %.

STRUCTURAL AND CYCLICAL FACTORS

Both seasonal and structural factors contributed to Hong Kong’s underwhelming post-pandemic economic performance. On the continuous side, rising regional interest rates as a result of US Federal Reserve rate increases made real estate an undesirable investment. Due to Hong Kong’s robust local currency, locals prefer to shop abroad while visitors find the city to be expensive.

Hong Kong is a victim of political tensions between the United States and China on the fundamental front. Trade relations between the two markets have decreased as a result of trade restrictions and tech restrictions, and more goods are now being rerouted around Hong Kong through next nations like Vietnam and Mexico.

Geopolitical unrest might have wider effects than just business. As a gate to and from island China, Hong Kong enjoyed long-term success. Hong Kong’s reputation as an East-meets-West hub has been fueled by financial services, buying and logistics, hospitality, and specialized services. Any departure from this agreement could pose a city-wide existential threat.

The significant wage and price difference between Hong Kong and the nearby city of Shenzhen is a significant structural component. For a fraction of the cost, Hong Kong residents can then access roughly comparable service nearby.

Residents of Hong Kong will continue to benefit from cheaper services and goods near as their economy more tightly integrates with the area, despite government initiatives to revitalize local businesses like the Night Vibes Hawaii campaign.

Continue Reading

Khazanah Nasional, CGC Digital invest in Singapore’s Funding Societies to broaden financing access to MSMEs

aims to increase protection to regions besides KL, Selangor, Penang, and Johor.Give energy development more cash flow management options over time.Funding Societies | Modalku, the largest integrated small and medium business modern financing platform in Southeast Asia, has been invested in by Khazanah Nasional Bhd and CGC Digital Sdn Bhd in…Continue Reading

Two new shrimp strains to battle disease

After a century of setbacks, the fishing industry is still recovering.

Two new shrimp strains to battle disease
One of two new Pacific light shrimp strains that researchers will use to revitalize the aquaculture industry is the Petchada 1 breeder, which was chosen for its quick growth. ( Apinya Wipatayotin provided the photo )

According to the Department of Fisheries, two new isolates of Pacific light crab have been successfully developed to support Thailand’s fishing sector.

The new strains, Sida 1, a disease-resistant genome, as well as the rapidly expanding Petchad 1, will aid in preserving the security of the local shrimp farming market, according to Praphan Leepayakul, the district’s deputy chief.

Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease ( EMS- AHPND), also known as Early Mortality Syndrome, has been causing a decline in bright crab land numbers since 2012. The department has collaborated with the Agricultural Research Development Agency to bring them back to life.

According to Mr. Praphan, the fungal illness had seriously harmed Thailand’s fishing industry.

Both domestic and international markets are in high demand for bright crab. It is a significant trade supply, producing an annual income of 100 billion ringgit on average.

According to Mr. Praphan,” The growth may aid in developing a sustainable shrimp business.”

A group of marine biologists created the new strains using chemical biological marker and selective breeding techniques.

The team chose different strains of Pacific light crab from the United States, Guam, and Thailand to study disease-free DNA and analyze genetic variety.

To examine the shrimp’s biological diversity and growth potential, they were fed in a biosecure environment.

According to the research, local strains in Thailand made up the best base population.

At the Hereditary Aqua- Canine Research and Development Centre in Phetchaburi province, the Petchada 1 producer was created. When compared to shrimp from different sources, it has a great growth potential.

When compared to its competitors, the Sida 1 producer, which is produced by the Hereditary Aqua- Animal Research and Development Centre in Nakhon Si Thammarat state, has the highest success rate for EMS and AHPND.

According to Mr. Praphan,” It is still under the research and development approach.” The following step is to put it to the test on a professional level. By lowering costs among shellfish farmers, we hope that it will be a major step toward the sustainability of the shrimp business.

Continue Reading

Two new shrimp breeds to battle disease

Despite a decade of setbacks, the fishing industry is still recovering.

Two new shrimp breeds to battle disease
One of two new genotypes of Pacific bright crab that researchers will use to revitalize the fishing industry is the Petchada 1 breeder, which was chosen for its quick growth. ( Photo provided by Amya Wipatayotin )

According to the Department of Fisheries, two new isolates of Pacific light crab have been successfully developed to support Thailand’s fishing sector.

The new strains, Sida 1, a disease-resistant genome, as well as the rapidly expanding Petchad 1, will aid in preserving the security of the local shrimp farming market, according to Praphan Leepayakul, the district’s deputy chief.

The department has collaborated with the Agricultural Research Development Agency to increase the number of white shrimp farms, which have been declining since 2012 as a result of the Early Mortality Syndrome ( also known as Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Disease ( EMS- AHPND ) outbreak.

According to Mr. Praphan, the fungal illness had seriously harmed Thailand’s fishing industry.

Both domestic and international markets are in high demand for bright shrimp. It generates an annual revenue of 100 billion ringgit, making it a significant export revenue source.

According to Mr. Praphan,” The growth may aid in developing a sustainable shrimp business.”

A group of marine biologists used chemical biological marker techniques and selective breeding to create the new strains.

The team chose different strains of Pacific light crab from the United States, Guam, and Thailand to study disease-free DNA and analyze genetic variety.

To examine the shrimp’s biological richness and growth potential, they were fed in a biosecure environment.

According to the study, private strains in Thailand made up the best base population.

At the Hereditary Aqua- Canine Research and Development Centre in Phetchaburi province, the Petchada 1 producer was created. When compared to shrimp from different sources, it has a great growth potential.

When compared to its competitors, the Sida 1 producer, which is produced by the Biological Aqua- Animal Research and Development Centre in Nakhon Si Thammarat state, has the highest success rate for EMS and AHPND.

According to Mr. Praphan, the research and development operation is still ongoing. The following step is to put it to the test on a professional level. By lowering costs among shellfish farmers, we hope that it will be a major step towards the sustainability of the shrimp business.

Continue Reading

PBOC, BOJ start 2024 on a razor’s edge

TOKYO- Despite all the issues regarding the US Federal Reserve, the People’s Bank of China and Bank for Japan are the source of the actual play this season.

The task of stabilizing Asia’s largest economy and fending off negative forces without re-inflating property bubble falls to PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng in Beijing. As Japan flirts with a recession, BOJ Governor&nbsp, Kazuo Ueda, is under pressure to end quantitative easing ( QE ) over in Tokyo.

Failure by either of the best policymakers could have unpredictable effects on the international economic order.

That is not to say that the Fed cannot slam markets in Seoul and New York with even the tiniest hint of budgetary action. The typical wisdom has swung with mind-boggling rate in recent days, from more level hikes to extreme easing in the coming months.

As Fed Chairman Jerome Powell chooses whether to applaud or upset investors, dangers abound. If you relax very soon, inflation may last forever. The Fed may increase the likelihood of a recession and potential bank problems if rates are cut too soon.

However, at the beginning of 2024, the difficulties authorities in Beijing and Tokyo are facing are much more complicated.

China is dealing with an intensifying real estate crisis, high rates of youth unemployment, negative pressures, and a Communist Party that is losing support from continent residents and overseas investors. In general, all of those pressures may support forceful price reductions.

When you add President Xi Jinping’s deleveraging directive, items become much more complicated. Since 2016, the transformation team at Xi has prioritized containing risks associated with a decade of excessive loans. China’s debt-to-GDP ratio increased from 180 % in 2011 to 256 % in 2017.

According to Logan Wright, chairman of China markets studies at Rhodium Group, this deleveraging plan “is the only reasonable starting point to discuss how China’s fundamental economic slowdown began.”

According to Wright,” China’s economic authorities cut record growth in half and made it much more difficult for Beijing to power the economy using its standard tools of credit-fueled investment by state-owned enterprises and regional governments” by reducing the growth of the shadow, or casual banking system.

According to Wright, “property developers continued to increase their own loans throughout the deleveraging promotion, building up an exceptional real estate bubble before it finally burst in late 2021, boosting China’s current&nbsp, financial grief.” Following the global financial crisis, the deleveraging strategy marked the end of China’s unparalleled credit growth.

According to Wright,” China perhaps may have experienced a fiscal crisis much sooner had Beijing never taken the aggressive steps it did targeting shadow banks starting in 2016, as its system became increasingly difficult to regulate and was already resembling parts of the US economic system before the 2007–2008 global economic crises.”

Vice Governor of the People’s Bank of China ( PBOC ) Pan Gongsheng is depicted here. Online, New Straits Times, and Screengrab

Pan naturally does n’t want to waste money trying to slow down China’s boom-and-bust cycles. Pan wants to prevent encouraging a relapse into poor banking and borrowing practices. Additionally, his team needs to be aware that Premier Li Qiang and Xi do n’t want the yuan to fall significantly below current levels.

However, slow economic growth and low consumer prices are also urging more financial aid. Particularly when international challenges are getting worse, as evidenced by the highest&nbsp, US yields, in nearly 20 years, among other indicators.

China’s economy experienced new signs of weakness in December as stock task remained subdued. The Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index for the country fell from 49.4 in November, the third consecutive month of recession and the biggest drop in six times. Data indicate that stress on China’s services industry is also getting worse.

All of this points to the need for more signal in the short term, placing pressure on Pan’s PBOC.

In his annual New Year speech on Sunday, Xi insisted that China’s market had” sustained the speed of treatment.” However, talk of a significant new macroeconomic paying jolt was absent. &nbsp,

While acknowledging that” some companies had a tough time, some people had problems finding work and meeting basic needs” in the face of “headwinds,” Xi made it clear that long-term economic stability continues to be the top priority.

According to Xi,” we may continue to act in accordance with the principles of establishing the new before abolishing the ancient, promoting stability through headway, and seeking development while maintaining balance.”

Investors may be encouraged by Xi’s intentional phrasing if he uses this five-year term, his third, to accelerate reforms to increase innovation and productivity. &nbsp,

Xi, for instance, emphasized how scientific developments were boosting China’s “manufacturing skill” in lithium batteries, solar photovoltaic cells, and electric vehicles.

Notably, Xi vowed to “double efforts to advance science and technology, build talents, and boost education.” New levels are being scaled with tenacious resolve, and new works and improvements are emerging every day, as Xi put it.

The decline in island China is also echoing throughout Asia. As best markets almost everyday experienced sharp gains in 2023, Hong Kong stocks lost approximately US$ 523 billion in market value. &nbsp,

In 2023, the MSCI World Index increased by 22 %. Hong Kong companies, on the other hand, dropped for the second year out of the previous six. As local require declined, the S&amp, P Global Taiwan Manufacturing PMI decreased from 48.3 in November to 47.1 in December.

Due to all of this, the central banks will be responsible for any efforts to address China’s slowing growth without escalating its disparities. Anyone can speculate as to how Pan threads these numerous needles or whether the PBOC also you. &nbsp,

Kazuo Ueda, the government of the Bank of Japan, is having trouble endingQE. Image: Screengrab / Online

The BOJ of Ueda, which is under intense pressure to leave QE, may become compared in a similar way. Profit-hungry banks are sick of eking out meager profits in a culture with negative interest rates.

However, a recession in Japan’s local economy is quite possible to have ended 2023. In the months of July and September, growth decreased 2.9 % quarter over quarter. Since then, there has n’t been much evidence that the fourth quarter was any stronger.

According to scholar Marcel Thieliant of Capital Economics, even though the third-quarter GDP decline “was only a blip,” we” also assume GDP growth to slow down quickly” this year.

This makes it extremely difficult for Ueda to transition away from its 24 years of zero interest rates, 22 years ‘ worth of QE, and an eight-year period of negative yield policies. It is obvious that high prices gives Team Ueda enough weapons to start “tapering.”

Core inflation is currently higher than 3 %, excluding fresh food and energy. We plainly see pretty resilient upward pressures in support prices, according to ING Bank economist Min Joo Kang.” It’s correct that cost-push inflation tends to be short-lived and could be transitory.

Japan Inc. may not be prepared for financial alcoholism, though. Banks, businesses, local governments, pension and healthcare resources, universities, assets, the postal savings method, and the growing number of seniors will all suffer significant losses if Japanese government yields increase to 2 % or even 3 %.

This “mutually assured death” active had previously prevented almost anyone from selling loan. Tokyo will have more trouble paying off the largest debt load in the developed world, which is currently at about 265 % of GDP, the higher provides go.

These contradictory factors raise concerns about the size of the currency’s most recent increases. According to researcher Ipek Ozkardeskaya at Swissquote Bandank,” The market’s place regarding the yen may n’t be clearer.” The most obvious industry in the forex markets right now is the long Japanese yen. It is almost to simple.

possibly incorrect. Before retiring in April to&nbsp, Haruhiko Kuroda, Ueda’s father, had a number of opportunities, pivot away from QE, or simply telephone that an leave might be in the cards. He did n’t. &nbsp,

To be sure, Kuroda prepared for a change in December 2022 by allowing yields to increase by as much as 0.5 %. International markets became chaotic as a result, prompting Kuroda’s staff to rush to acquire debt and signal that BOJ policy had not changed.

That was an error. Kuroda had plenty of opportunity to signal QE was finished over the course of the following several months as he prepared to leave BOJ office. &nbsp,

Markets were ready for a great statement, and the Tokyo creation was reluctantly preparing for one. Kuroda, who had spent the previous ten years elevating QE to new heights, also had enough political clout to start reversing his extreme asset hoarding.

Ueda has witnessed economic conditions deteriorate in the 269 weeks since taking the stick. The widely anticipated post-Covid boom&nbsp in China did n’t occur, the Fed kept tightening, and the Japanese GDP started to decline. Ueda’s ability to leave QE is constrained by all of this.

Ueda consistently confused bet for major BOJ action, with the exception of a few minor adjustments to allow 10-year yields to major 1 %. Local trends today make it extremely challenging for Ueda to tighten its financial straps. &nbsp,

According to Commonwealth Bank of Australia analyst Joseph Capurso, wage growth is “remains poor and weakening.” ” We anticipate that the dollar-yen’s upward momentum will pick back up later this year.”

Jerome Powell, US Federal Reserve Chair Photo: Xinhua

The BOJ’s decision-making process is influenced by what the Fed does in Washington. According to Marc Chandler, main market strategist at Bannockburn Global Forex,” the question is when and how quickly Fed price reductions may be delivered.” &nbsp,

The swing of market sentiment has significantly shifted from the “higher for longer” mantra of the majority of last year to pricing in extreme easing, according to him, as a result of moderated price pressures and weaker growth impulses. &nbsp,

However, how Beijing and Tokyo control 2024 will continue to be the main topic of discussion in central banks circles. Additionally, neither the PBOC nor BOJ are currently aware of any surprises that may be in store for them in the coming 12 weeks.

William Pesek can be reached at @WilliamPesak on X, previously Twitter.

Continue Reading

Will ‘magnificent seven’ tech stocks ride as high in 2024?

Seven gunfighters defend a town from thieves in the 1960 northern The Magnificent Seven. At the end of the film, just three are left to ride out of town.

After dominating US investment markets in 2023, the seven tech companies just dubbed the beautiful seven have much better odds. However, there are issues that may surprise some of these businesses in 2024.

In 2023, US securities have risen thanks to Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, and Nvidia. They now account for almost a third of the largest listed US companies ‘ S&amp, P 500 measure, which has increased by more than 20 % since January.

By the middle of November, these tech stocks had given shareholders a whopping 71 % return, while the other 493 names had only added 6 %.

Michael Hartnett, an analyst for Bank of America, named these businesses the wonderful seven earlier this year as a result of this outstanding achievement. Shortly after, Goldman Sachs declared their enormous outperformance to be the “defining feature” of the 2023 ownership industry.

However, despite how dramatic this performance has been and the fact that they are all essentially tech companies, do n’t mistakenly believe that all of them are the same. In fact, there are conflicting expectations for the beautiful seven in the coming year, especially in light of anticipated changes in their primary markets.

The EV industry is becoming more competitive.

This begin with the unfavorable information. Tesla Motors, a manufacturer of electric vehicles ( EV ), will continue to lose market share in 2024.

Over the first three quarters of this year, Tesla’s US market dominance decreased from 62 % to just over 50 % of the market, while CEO Elon Musk has been dealing with advertising issues on X ( previously Twitter ), one of his other businesses. Mercedes-Benz Autos and the BMW Group have both increased their traces.

And over the coming years, the expanding size of Taiwanese manufacturers on a global scale appears to be difficult to match. In 2022, Chinese EV players like BYD, Nio, Wuling, and Xpeng produced nearly 60 % of the world’s electric vehicles ( EVs ), and they did so at a very low cost.

The average price of an EV in China in the first half of 2023 was$ 33, 000, which is more than twice what the$ 70,700 and$ 72, 000 spent on them in Europe and the US, respectively.

By 2032, nearly two-thirds of all new vehicles sold in the US will be energy, according to a tight new car pollution control proposal put forth by US President Joe Biden. However, the price of EVs will need to decrease if they are to be popular in the large industry.

A grey Tesla model S driving on the road with the sun setting in the background.
Photo of a Tesla Model S: CanadianPhotographer56 / Shutterstock via The Talk

Optimal future for sky computing

Two-thirds of the cloud computing industry, which has seven people and is dominated by Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet, will continue to expand in 2024, though perhaps not quite as much as in the past.

However, it is anticipated that the market for sky equipment companies will grow from$ 122 billion in 2023 to$ 446 billion by 2032. In recent years, some customers have concentrated on using the cloud more to reduce costs as a result of worries about the economic environment, though this has yet to include any discernible effect on revenues.

Additionally, there are some unanswered questions about Amazon’s future. Although its sky business is still strong, its original e-commerce business has just faced increasing competition, particularly from rival wholesale behemoth Walmart, which is squeezing into its US operations.

According to my calculations, holding Amazon stock has yielded an annual profit of 16.7 % over the last two years as of early December.

Unstoppable AI

California-based chip manufacturer Nvidia Corporation, which is also connected to the cloud computing sector, has been the resounding victory of the beautiful seven this year. This is entirely attributable to its dominance in cloud-based AI workload control. Nvidia graphics processing units ( GPUs ) are primarily used by cloud players.

Although its two-year transfer of 43.3 % is the most spectacular of the seven technology firms, there are potential rivals that may eat up some market share.

AMD, Nvidia’s closest rival, attracted attention with its most recent chip offering in 2023 and predicts that the market will be worth$ 400 billion by 2027. Numerous other start-ups are also creating cards for specialized AI areas.

You Nvidia keep its hegemony? If it does, AI’s development may cause its revenue to soar. However, the AI market will continue to grow for years even if it loses some business communicate.

Jen-Hsun Huan, NVIDIA's founder, president and CEO, talking about the chipmaker.
Jen-Hsun Huan is the creator, president, and CEO of NVIDIA. Jamesonwu 1972, courtesy of Shutterstock via The Talk

The unusual

That only leaves two more people of the beautiful seven, for those who are keeping track.

According to my calculations, Apple Inc., the largest company in the world by market capitalization, has consistently produced strong results over the past two decades.

The only member of the group to have demonstrated an basically flat property market performance over the past two years is social media firm Meta, the owner of Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp.

Although Meta’s revenues and income have consistently exceeded expectations this time, the company is still in danger from anti-trust laws in the US and Europe, as well as from a declining advertising business. The profit outlook for Meta for the upcoming year could be negatively impacted by both of these problems.

The beautiful seven have all made it out of town by the end of 2023, but it is obvious that not everyone will enjoy a leisurely ride on horseback in 2024. Get on your horses, companions!

International Institute for Management Development ( IMD) Professor of Finance KarlSchmedders

Under a Creative Commons license, this article is republished from The Conversation. read the article in its entirety.

Continue Reading

China’s BYD overtakes Tesla’s electric car sales in last quarter of 2023

Models pose with a BYD car in Japan.Reuters

In the final three months of 2023, BYD, a Chinese firm, sold more electric cars than Tesla, owned by Musk Elon.

In the last quarter of 2023, BYD reported on Monday that it had sold a report 526, 000 battery-only cars.

It was the first quarter that Tesla’s battery-only profits had surpassed theirs. The US-based company has observed a gradual increase in demand as saving prices rise.

But, Mr. Musk’s Tesla continued to sell more throughout the entire year of 2023.

Tesla announced on Tuesday that it had produced 1.8 million electric cars overall and 484,500 in the final three months of 2023.

Sales increased by 20 % from the same period in 2022 and picked up speed from earlier 2023, proving that the end-of-year performance was better than analysts had anticipated. The third was a” distinct win” for Tesla, according to scientist Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities.

But it did n’t live up to expectations. Mr. Musk stated in January of last year that Tesla had the potential to make two million shipments by 2023.

The company consistently reduced prices in an effort to entice customers.

BYD’s accomplishment of this step serves as a constant reminder of the difficulties the company must overcome in order to establish the electric car sector.

According to Susannah Streeter, mind of wealth and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, BYD’s acceleration into the fast street “is new evidence of how competitive the Volt market has become and how difficult it will be for Tesla to turn back to lead the pack.”

Shenzen-based BYD sold more than 3 million so-called new energy vehicles ( NEVs ), which include hybrids and battery-only vehicles, for the entire year.

According to the company, nearly 1.6 million of its overall sales were battery-only vehicles.

In 1995, Wang Chuanfu, the CEO of BYD, co-founded the company with his niece in Shenzhen.

The business established a reputation for producing rechargeable batteries that competed with more expensive Chinese goods and were used in phones, laptops, and other electronics.

In 2002, it began trading shares on the stock exchange, and it expanded by buying Qinchuan Automobile Company, a struggling state-owned automaker.

Berkshire Hathaway, owned by seasoned US investment Warren Buffett, has been a stockholder of BYD since 2008.

Experts claim that BYD’s expansion is due to its initial business, chargers. Making them in-house saves BYD a ton of money because they are among the most costly components of anEV.

For chargers, some of BYD’s rivals rely on third-party producers.

BYD’s power business contributed to its flexibility in cutting costs quickly at the end of 2023, increasing sales, which increased by 70 % in just December.

Continue Reading

US feeling the pain of slow-motion decoupling

Forces inherited from 2022 shaped the US economy in 2023 — high but falling inflation, rising interest rates, neo-protectionist industrial policy, conflict with China, empty trade initiatives and the resurgence of former US president Donald Trump. 

From an Asian perspective, the macro impact of US economic policy was benign and the micro impact was adverse, but security guarantees were welcome.

Political gridlock in Washington, with closely divided House and Senate numbers in Congress, is overshadowing economic events. Extreme positions advocated by right-wing Republicans and left-wing Democrats make agreement on significant legislation difficult. 

Neither the Democratic Party nor the Republican Party is willing to advocate painful expenditure cuts or tax increases that would curtail high budget deficits, now running at 6–7% of GDP. The United States is traveling an unsustainable fiscal path.

Measured by the Consumer Price Index, annual inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, slowing to 3.2% in November 2023. Owing to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, price inflation spurted during the first half of 2022. 

That spurred wage inflation, fostered by an unemployment rate under 4% through 2023. In 2024, the Federal Reserve’s biggest decision is how long to keep monetary conditions tight to ensure that inflation returns to the preferred 2%.

Chairman Jerome Powell retired “transitory” from the Federal Reserve’s description of inflation in November 2021. He initiated a sustained rise in the federal funds rate, from 0 in January 2022 to 5.25–5.5% in July 2023. 

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell testifies during the Senate Banking Committee hearing titled ‘The Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress’ on March 3, 2022. Photo: Asia Times Files / Pool

Powell’s goal was to reach the 2% inflation target, even at the cost of more unemployment. Yet, there was no slowdown in the US economy during 2023.

Instead, Wall Street and Main Street relished the “soft landing” scenario. With inflation above 2%, the mantra for interest rates became “high for longer,” and yields on 30-year US Treasury bonds reached 5% in October 2023 before retreating. Sustained high interest rates aimed to quell inflation, but skeptics forecast a mild recession in 2024.

Early in 2023, several regional banks collapsed due to significant unrealized losses on their Treasury bond portfolios as interest rates rose. The Federal Reserve served as the lender of last resort, enabling troubled banks to borrow against the face value of Treasury bonds, containing the crisis. 

Yet, many regional banks now grapple with distressed commercial real estate loans as the Covid-19 pandemic work-from-home trend continues to amplify office vacancies. This could trigger another regional bank crisis in 2024.

Elevated US interest rates appreciated the dollar against most currencies throughout 2023. Consequently, Asian countries paid more, in local currency terms, for US exports, but they also earned more from exports to the United States. Additionally, sustained US GDP growth attracted imports from Asia.

Some Asian central banks raised their interest rates, but Asian share markets did not particularly suffer. Between December 2022 and October 2023, Japanese equities appreciated 18%, South Korean 10% and Taiwan 16%, while Chinese, Singaporean and Australian shares ended the year roughly flat.

Towards the end of 2023, the expectation of falling US interest rates in 2024 slightly reduced the broad dollar exchange rate.

In his February 2023 State of the Union address, US President Joe Biden proclaimed Buy America as a core policy without addressing the cost of this policy for taxpayers or US allies. The new reality hit Asian partners in 2023 with the implementation of significant multi-year industrial policies. 

The five-year US$1.2 trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Act of 2021 — funding highways, bridges, railways, high-speed internet and electric vehicle charging stations — mandated that every federal dollar procure US goods and services.

The $278 billion CHIPS and Sciences Act of 2022 subsidizes the semiconductor industry with $78 billion over five years. Funds are equally available to foreign firms, attracting Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company to build large fabrication plants in the United States. Europe and Japan are now compelled to offer subsidies to stay in the semiconductor race.

The $394 billion misnamed Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 added neo-protectionism to climate-friendly initiatives. Battery and electric vehicle subsidies hinge on their production in the United States or a free trade agreement partner country. Responding to Japanese and South Korean complaints, special workarounds were designed to accommodate their export interests.

Slow-motion decoupling was 2023’s policy theme. US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan tried to distinguish between de-risking and decoupling, but that was wordplay to Chinese ears. 

Joe Biden wants more chip production done in the United States. Image: Twitter / Screengrab

Advanced semiconductors — whether made by US or allied Asian firms — became forbidden exports and numerous Chinese companies were blackballed on the US Department of Commerce’s “entity list.”

The November 2023 Biden-Xi Summit focussed on setting guidelines to avoid military conflict but produced no commercial breakthroughs. Since Asian countries trade more with China than with the United States, they will try to sit on the fence.

Despite criminal indictments and civil trials, opinion polls put Trump in a strong position for the 2024 election. In addition to the disruptive geopolitical consequences of a second Trump presidential term, amplified “America First” policies – starting with a 10% across-the-board tariff – would echo the disastrous Smoot-Hawley tariff of the 1930s.

Gary Clyde Hufbauer is a non-resident Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute of International Economics.

This article was originally published by East Asia Forum and is republished under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

How Japan is willingly ceding the future to China

TOKYO — The next blow to the collective Japanese psyche will be falling behind Germany to become the fourth-biggest economy. Yet, 12 years on, Tokyo is still grappling with having watched China surpass it in gross domestic product terms.

It was in 2010 and 2011 that banner headlines proclaimed the changing of the guard, when the economic student amassed greater power than the teacher. China, like South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and other Asian “tigers,” cribbed from parts of Japan’s development model.

Why, then, is Japan’s fiercely proud political establishment making it so easy for China to continue to throttle forward?

Many Japan pundits disagree with the terms of this debate vehemently. The force is strong with the conventional wisdom, which is that GDP matters far less than per capita income – a metric on which Japan blows the doors off China.

And, clearly, Chinese leader Xi Jinping has shot his economy in the foot enough times to slow progress. From disruptive crackdowns on tech to draconian Covid lockdowns, Xi has generated more headwinds than tailwinds since 2020.

Yet many global investors and academics can’t help but wonder what, oh what, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s Liberal Democratic Party is up to as Asia’s economic clock speeds up and China raises its game.

In 2013, the LDP returned to power with a bold plan to get Japan’s economic groove back. At the time, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe made unveiled references to reminding China whose continent Asia is.

Sadly, his pledges – to reduce bureaucracy, increase innovation and productivity, liberalize labor markets, incentivize a startup boom, empower women, attract more foreign talent and give Shanghai a run for its money as Asia’s financial center – fell by the wayside.

Although Abe succeeded in strengthening corporate governance a bit, the dearth of reforms elsewhere stunted wage growth. Hopes for a virtuous cycle of fattened paychecks and a surge in domestic demand never materialized.

The reason is that Abe relied almost entirely on aggressive monetary easing to save the day. A 30% plunge in the yen in the years after 2013 generated record corporate profits. The trouble is, it deadened Japan’s competitive drive, too.

Weaker exchange rates took the onus off corporate chieftains to innovate, restructure and take risks. Politicians had no need to recalibrate engines toward domestic demand-led growth and away from a 1970s-like export-centric model.

Rather than delivering a shock to an atrophied economic system, Abenomics cemented its flaws. Japan effectively squandered the last 10 years during which it had a window of opportunity to narrow the gap with China. Hence the confusion among investors and academics about what Abe’s protégé, Kishida, is up to with regard to raising Japan’s own economic game.

The late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his protégé Fumio Kishida, the current premier. Photo: Screengrab / Al Jazeera

Kishida started off well enough in October 2021. He rose to the premiership with his own ambitious “new capitalism” scheme to raise middle-class incomes. Yet like his mentor’s plan, Kishidanomics has been far more aspiration than actual retooling.

These two-plus years were fertile for Kishida to alter tax policy to encourage startup activity. In fact, he had an audacious plan to tap Japan’s US$1.6 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund to finance startups.

It’s the most creative idea the LDP has had to date to jumpstart the growth of Japan’s venture capital industry. Little has come of it, though. Kishida has prioritized fiscal stimulus and Bank of Japan easing over structural reform.

Nor has Kishida reinvigorated the unfinished Abe reforms. In the interim, China’s slowdown and the highest US bond yields in 17 years turned the tables on Japan’s post-pandemic recovery. The economy shrank 2.9% in the July-September period from the previous quarter.

There’s little in recent data to suggest the economy has gained any steam in the October-December quarter. This means Kishida will be even more preoccupied than usual, and less likely to resurrect the reform process.

This downshift also reduces the odds that BOJ will be “tapering” or normalizing rate policy anytime soon. If BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda wasn’t comfortable pivoting away from quantitative easing in 2023, the odds may be even lower amid a deepening recession.

All this means Japan’s “opportunity cost” problem persists. When government after government chooses the easy way to boost growth, they’re choosing not to build economic muscle. This has been the trade-off the LDP accepted for decades, but especially these last 10 years.

Image: Hedgeye

If only Abe had made good use of his nearly eight years in office to remake the economy instead of relying on a weak yen, Japan might be booming. If only Abe’s successor Yoshihide Suga had used his 12 months in office to reanimate Japan’s animal spirits. Or if Kishida hadn’t let 26 months pass without putting any major upgrades on the scoreboard.

Now, with his approval rating at 17%, Kishida has negligible political capital to shake up the economy. As scandals engulf the LDP and opposition parties pounce, Kishida will be too busy in 2024 struggling to keep his job to do it.

As reform hopes fade, China has even freer reign over Asia’s future. For all China’s challenges, including a giant property crisis, the self-sabotage that Japanese politicians are inflicting on the economy plays right into Beijing’s hands.

Kishida is having to ramp up government spending to address the recession. This latest burst of borrowing is almost certain to pique the interest of credit rating companies like Moody’s Investors Service, which recently threatened to downgrade the US and China.

With a national debt more than twice GDP, Tokyo has limited fiscal space to act. This, in turn, will complicate Kishida’s plan to boost military spending by 50% over the next few years. Again, great news for Xi’s China as Tokyo’s security ambitions run into headwinds, too.

When investors and academics in Asia wonder why Japan thinks time is on its side, or what Kishida’s government is thinking, it’s a valid question. The longer Tokyo takes to answer it, the better it is for China’s ability to own the future.

Continue Reading