Why China curbing rare earth exports is a huge blow to the US

26 minutes ago
Ayeshea Perera

BBC News

Getty Images Annealed neodymium iron boron magnets sit in a barrel prior to being crushed into powder at Neo Material Technologies Inc.'s Magnequench Tianjin Co. factory in Tianjin, China, on Friday, June 11, 2010Getty Images

As the trade war between China and the US escalates, attention has been focused on the increasingly high levels of tit-for-tat tariffs the two countries are imposing on one another.

But slapping reciprocal tariffs on Washington is not the only way Beijing has been able to retaliate.

China has now also imposed export controls on a range of critical rare earth minerals and magnets, dealing a major blow to the US.

The move has laid bare how reliant America is on these minerals.

This week, Trump ordered the commerce department to come up with ways to boost US production of critical minerals and cut reliance on imports – an attempt by Washington to reclaim this critical industry. But why exactly are rare earths so important and how could they shake up the trade war?

What are rare earths and what are they used for?

“Rare earths” are a group of 17 chemically similar elements that are crucial to the manufacture of many high-tech products.

Most are abundant in nature, but they are known as “rare” because it is very unusual to find them in a pure form, and they are very hazardous to extract.

Although you may not be familiar with the names of these rare earths – like Neodymium, Yttrium and Europium – you will be very familiar with the products that they are used in.

For instance, Neodymium is used to make the powerful magnets used in loudspeakers, computer hard drives, EV motors and jet engines that enable them to be smaller and more efficient.

Yttrium and Europium are used to manufacture television and computer screens because of the way they display colours.

“Everything you can switch on or off likely runs on rare earths,” explains Thomas Kruemmer, Director of Ginger International Trade and Investment.

Rare earths are also critical to the production of medical technology like laser surgery and MRI scans, as well as key defence technologies.

What does China control?

China has a near monopoly on extracting rare earths as well as on refining them – which is the process of separating them from other minerals.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that China accounts for about 61% of rare earth production and 92% of their processing.

That means it currently dominates the rare earths supply chain and has the capacity to decide which companies can and cannot receive supplies of rare earths.

Both the extraction and processing of these rare earths are costly and polluting.

All rare earth resources also contain radioactive elements, which is why many other countries, including those in the EU, are reluctant to produce them.

“Radioactive waste from production absolutely requires safe, compliant, permanent disposal. Currently all disposal facilities in EU are temporary,” says Mr Kruemmer.

But China’s dominance in the rare earth supply chain didn’t take place overnight – but rather, is the result of decades of strategic government policies and investment.

In a visit to Inner Mongolia in 1992, the late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, who oversaw China’s economic reform, famously said: “The Middle East has oil and China has rare earths”.

“Beginning in the late 20th century, China prioritised the development of its rare earth mining and processing capabilities, often at lower environmental standards and labour costs compared to other nations,” said Gavin Harper, a critical materials research fellow at the University of Birmingham.

“This allowed them to undercut global competitors and build a near-monopoly across the entire value chain, from mining and refining to the manufacturing of finished products like magnets.”

How has China restricted exports of these minerals?

In response to tariffs imposed by Washington, China earlier this month began ordering restrictions on the exports of seven rare earth minerals – most of which are known as “heavy” rare earths, which are crucial to the defence sector.

These are less common and are harder to process than “light” rare earths, which also makes them more valuable.

From 4 April, all companies now have to get special export licenses in order to send rare earths and magnets out of the country.

That is because as a signatory to the international treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, China has the ability to control the trade of “dual use products”.

According to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), this leaves the US particularly vulnerable as there is no capacity outside China to process heavy rare earths.

Getty Images A labourer works at the site of a rare earth metals mine at Nancheng county, Jiangxi provinceGetty Images

How could this impact the US?

A US Geological report notes that between 2020 and 2023, the US relied on China for 70% of its imports of all rare earth compounds and metals.

This means that the new restrictions have the ability to hit the US hard.

Heavy rare earths are used in many military fields such as missiles, radar, and permanent magnets.

A CSIS report notes that defence technologies including F-35 jets, Tomahawk missiles and Predator unmanned aerial vehicles all depend on these minerals.

It adds that this comes as China “expands its munitions production and acquires advanced weapons systems and equipment at a pace five to six times faster than the United States”.

“The impact on the US defence industry will be substantial,” said Mr Kroemmer.

And it’s not only in the field of defence.

US manufacturing, which Trump has said he hopes to revive through the imposition of his tariffs, stand to be severely impacted.

“Manufacturers, particularly in defence and high-tech, face potential shortages and production delays due to halted shipments and limited inventories,” said Dr Harper.

“Prices for critical rare earth materials are expected to surge, increasing the immediate costs of components used in a wide range of products, from smartphones to military hardware,” he says, adding that this could result in potential production slowdowns for affected US companies.

If such a shortage from China persists in the long-run, the US could potentially begin diversifying its supply chains and scaling up its domestic and processing capabilities, though this would still require “substantial and sustained investment, technological advancements and potentially higher overall costs compared to the previous dependence on China”.

And it’s clear this is something already on Trump’s mind. This week, he ordered an investigation into the national security risks posed by the US’ reliance on such critical minerals.

“President Trump recognises that an overreliance on foreign critical minerals and their derivative products could jeopardise US defence capabilities, infrastructure development, and technological innovation,” said the order.

“Critical minerals, including rare earth elements, are essential for national security and economic resilience.”

Can’t the US produce its own rare earths?

The US has one operational rare earths mine, but it does not have the capacity to separate heavy rare earths and has to send its ore to China for processing.

There used to be US companies that manufactured rare earth magnets – until the 1980s, the US was in fact the largest producer of rare earths.

But these companies exited the market as China began to dominate in terms of scale and cost.

This is largely believed to be part of why US president Donald Trump is so keen to sign a minerals deal with Ukraine – it wants to reduce dependency on China.

Another place Trump has had his eye on is Greenland – which is endowed with the eighth largest reserves of rare earth elements.

Trump has repeatedly showed interest in taking control of the autonomous Danish dependent territory and has refused to rule out economic or military force to take control of it.

These might have been places that the US could have sourced some of its rare earth exports from, but the adversarial tone Trump has struck with them means the US could be left with very few alternative suppliers.

“The challenge the U.S. faces is two-fold, on the one hand it has alienated China who provides the monopoly supply of rare earths, and on the other hand it is also antagonising many nations that have previously been friendly collaborators through tariffs and other hostile actions,” said Dr Harper.

“Whether they will still prioritise collaboration with America remains to be seen in the turbulent policy environment of this new administration.”

Continue Reading

China Power: Cultural exports script a softer narrative in Southeast Asia

Thailand is a top choice for Taiwanese production companies among all the nations in Southeast Asia. &nbsp, &nbsp,

According to Jeff Han, a representative for Chinese tech company Tencent, Thailand was a prime location for ability and leisure production.

Google filmed its famous real hero contest set Chuang Asia in Thailand in 2024. &nbsp,

70 recruits from countries in the region, including Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, competed for spots in a fresh foreign lady group as part of the 10-episode series, which was shot in Bangkok. &nbsp,

Dr. Kornphanat Tungkeunkunt, a professor at Thammasat University, called it” a strategic shift” that “opened new opportunities” in international markets as well as a” striking move” that allowed Google to evade stringent domestic laws in China.

Beginning in December, Season 2 was shot in Bangkok, and included appearances by Season 2, rapper BamBam ( also known as a member of the K-pop boy band GOT7 ), Blackpink’s Lisa, and singer Jeff Satur. &nbsp,

60 aspiring employees from nine countries and regions competed for the title of the fresh seven-member boyband NexT1DE during the broadcast that aired from February 2 through&nbsp, April 6. &nbsp,

Thailand’s “dynamic pleasure business,” “well-established legend society,” and international attractiveness made it best to host and film the reality show, Han said. &nbsp,

The region offers an ideal environment to learn and nourish new talent, according to the statement from the country, which includes several powerful Thai stars who have gained worldwide fame.

Chinese leisure companies also face significant challenges in navigating Southeast Asia’s various and “uneven modern terrain” to provide shows and other offerings to local audiences, even as Chinese pop culture  offerings gain traction in the region. &nbsp,

All people will have access to the products, she said. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

Department of Special Investigation to widen building collapse probe

To be looked into state with fake signatures

Excavators are removing debris at the collapsed State Audit Office site in Chatuchak district, Bangkok, on Wednesday. (Photo: Bangkok Metropolitan Administration)
On Wednesday, excavators are removing particles from the State Audit Office building in Bangkok’s Chatuchak area. Bangkok Metropolitan Administration in image

The State Audit Office ( SAO ) building collapse will be included in the Department of Special Investigation’s ( DSI) investigation, which will include businesses tasked with the design, building supervision, and construction contracts.

The ministry will also look into the claims of a senior engineer connected to the job who allegedly forged signatures.

Following the investigation into the two venture companies, Justice Minister Pol Col Tawee Sodsong and DSI Director-General Pol Maj Yutthana Praedam met at the page of the collapse on Wednesday.

There are two scenarios in which to divide the research. One involves alleged company nominees, and the other involves top architect Somkiat Chusangsuk’s forged signatures, who denied being a part of the project.

Both cases have been accepted by the DSI as special circumstances.

The two companies are being looked into by the DSI because they are suspected of using nominees to gain projects.

Data from four contracts that pertain to the building’s architectural design, construction supervision, and design modifications must be examined by the investigation.

The DSI claims to have obtained the necessary data and evidence in relation to the event of personal forgery. The forensic experts are expected to conduct a review of the supposedly forged and real signatures within two weeks after receiving the results.

Despite having stopped serving as a job officer more than 20 years ago, Mr. Somkiat claimed he was mistakenly named in documents as the “project superintendent” for PKW Joint Venture.

He has provided information to both the DSI and officers in a bid to clear his name and is pursuing legal actions against those responsible for the alleged fraud.

Before beginning its investigation into other cases, such as the bidders for the site’s contracts, the DSI must finish its investigation into the candidate case.

Worasak Kanok-Nukulchai, an Asian Institute of Technology professor professor and professional in architecture, described the tragedy as a “pancake decline,” which took eight hours.

Like a stack of cakes, the decks came down in sequence, one after the other.

So far in the decline, 44 people have died, and 50 more are also missing.

Continue Reading

DSI to widen building collapse probe

Forged unique claim to get examined

Excavators are removing debris at the collapsed State Audit Office site in Chatuchak district, Bangkok, on Wednesday. Bangkok Metropolitan Administration
On Wednesday, excavators are removing particles from the State Audit Office building in Bangkok’s Chatuchak region. Bangkok Metropolitan Administration

The State Audit Office ( SAO ) building collapse will be included in the Department of Special Investigation’s ( DSI) investigation, which will include businesses tasked with the design, building supervision, and construction contracts.

Additionally, the office will look into a top engineer’s claims that the project had forged signatures.

Following the investigation into the two job vendors, Justice Minister Pol Col Tawee Sodsong and DSI Director-General Pol Maj Yutthana Praedam met at the page of the collapse on Wednesday.

The case division has been made up of the research. One involves alleged company nominees, and the other involves top engineer Somkiat Chusangsuk’s forged signatures, who claimed he had no involvement in the project.

Both situations have been designated as particular cases by the DSI.

The two companies are being looked into by the DSI because they are suspected of using venture nominees to win agreements.

The research needs to examine four contracts, including those that pertain to the building’s architectural design, building supervision, and design modifications.

In the case of the unique forgery, the DSI claims to have obtained the necessary data and evidence. The forensic experts are expected to conduct a review of the supposedly forged and real signatures within two weeks after receiving the results.

Despite having stopped serving as a job officer more than 20 years ago, Mr. Somkiat claimed he was mistakenly named as the “project superintendent” for PKW Joint Venture in papers relating to the building’s floor wheel design changes.

He has provided information to both the DSI and authorities in a charge to clear his name and is pursuing legal action against those responsible for the alleged fraud.

Before it can increase its analysis to include other cases, such as the bidders for the site’s contracts, the DSI must finish its investigation into the nominee case.

Worasak Kanok-Nukulchai, an Asian Institute of Technology professor professor and professional in architecture, described the tragedy as a “pancake crumble” that lasted eight hours.

Like a stack of cakes, the decks came down in sequence, one after the other.

So far in the decline, 44 people have died, and 50 more are also missing.

Continue Reading

WEF names three Thais as young global leaders

Paetongtarn: Vision recognised
Paetongtarn: Vision recognized

The World Economic Forum ( WEF ) has named three Thai leaders as Young Global Leaders 2025, along with Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra.

According to the Geneva, Switzerland-based think tank, the 114 extraordinary individuals under the age of 40 are redefined as leaders in a changing universe.

The 2018 population has “made a mark” in a variety of industries and sectors, including fantastic chess players, unicorn founders, and award-winning musicians. They represent almost 50 nations together, according to the website.

The state category includes the premier among 19 youthful leaders.

According to Jirayu Houngsub, a spokeswoman for the government, Ms. Paetongtarn was recognized for her leadership and perception, which he believes will lead to positive changes in the government’s leadership on Wednesday.

Ms. Paetongtarn was recently named one of Time magazine’s 100 most powerful people, according to the official.

Although she is the youngest female prime minister in Thailand and Asia and has only been in charge for a short while, he said, “her management in addressing societal issues like call center schemes, substance abuse, and natural catastrophe, as well as pushing forward important plans has been commendable.”

Ken Lin, Senior Vice-President of Innovation and Global Investment of the Charoen Pokphand Group in the Business group, and Amornthep Sachamuneewongse, founder and CEO of Sati App, are the other two Thai officials on the list.

The World Economic Forum of Young Global Leaders (YGL ) is a project led by Mr. Jirayu, according to Mr. Jirayu. Its objective is to establish a network of fresh, visionary officials who are driven to make a positive impact on the world.

The main goal is to encourage leaders who have the ability to effect, inspire, and demonstrate leadership in order to effect positive change worldwide.

He claimed that there are now more than 1,400 people and past members from more than 120 nations, all of whom work in various fields including business, politics, education, the arts, and social engagement.

Ken Lin: A successful businessman

Ken Lin: A successful businessman

Amornthep: Social businessman

Amornthep: Social businessman

Continue Reading

GE2025: RDU unveils potential candidates for Jurong East-Bukit Batok GRC

SINGAPORE: Red Dot United (RDU) has unveiled its five potential candidates who will likely contest the Jurong East-Bukit Batok Group Representation Constituency (GRC). 

They are: non-profit organisation manager Liyana Dhamirah, waste management company director Osman Sulaiman, artist Ben Puah, marketing agency director Marcus Neo and principal software engineer Harish Mohanadas.  

Ms Liyana had previously contested under RDU in the 2020 General Election for Jurong GRC, while Mr Osman contested under the Singapore People’s Party (SPP) banner for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC.

Ms Liyana, Mr Puah and Mr Harish were earlier this month unveiled as “team leads” for the party’s campaign at the five-member GRC.

RDU presented the potential candidates to the media on Wednesday (Apr 16) at 255 Jurong East Street 24, near Jurong-Clementi Town Council, which is within Jurong East-Bukit Batok GRC.

The quintet, if fielded on Nomination Day on Apr 23, will be up against a People’s Action Party (PAP) slate that will be led by Minister for Sustainability and the Environment and former Yuhua SMC MP Grace Fu.  

Joining her are two new faces: charity director David Hoe and former Hougang representative Lee Hong Chuang. Also on the team are current Jurong GRC MP and Minister of State for Health and Digital Development and Information Rahayu Mazam, as well as Bukit Batok SMC MP and Minister of State for Transport and Law Murali Pillai.

Jurong East-Bukit Batok GRC was formed from a merger of Bukit Batok SMC and parts of Jurong GRC, Yuhua SMC and Hong Kah North SMC following the latest electoral boundaries review. The GRC has 142,510 voters.

Jurong GRC was PAP’s best-performing GRC in the last two elections, securing 79.29 per cent of votes in 2015 and 74.61 per cent in 2020. It was previously anchored by former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, who left politics to contest the presidency in 2023.

Singapore will head to the polls on May 3. 

LIYANA DHAMIRAH  

Ms Liyana, 38, is the manager of a non-profit organisation focused on gender equality. She also runs a virtual services business.

In 2020, she was fielded as part of RDU’s team contesting Jurong GRC alongside Ms Michelle Lee Juen, Mr Ravi Philemon, Mr Nicholas Tang and Mr Alec Tok. They attained 25.39 per cent of the vote.

That same year, Ms Liyana was named one of the SG100 Women in Tech for her contributions to the tech and entrepreneurial space. Her book Homeless: The Untold Story of a Mother’s Struggle in Crazy Rich Singapore won the best non-fiction title at the Singapore Book Awards.  

RDU said Ms Liyana has brought her “authenticity and grassroots spirit to the national stage” during the previous election. 

“She continues to champion policies that uplift families, support small businesses, and address systemic inequality – with a focus on lived experience, empathy, and action,” the party added.

OSMAN SULAIMAN

Mr Osman, 50, is a director of a waste management company in Cebu, Philippines, and has contested in the last three General Elections. 

His latest outing was under the SPP banner in 2020, when he contested Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC with Mr Steve Chia, Mr Melvyn Chiu, and Mr Williiamson Lee, attaining 32.77 per cent of the vote. 

He is an entrepreneur with more than 20 years of experience, having helmed two companies – one in interior design and another in debt consolidation. 

“Osman believes that it’s time to stop overlooking the workers who keep this country running,” said RDU in a statement on Wednesday. 

“He stands for a Singapore where every honest job is respected, and where government policies reflect the value of every citizen – not just the privileged few.”  

BEN PUAH 

Mr Puah, 48, is a contemporary artist and community art organiser. 

He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts with Distinction from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and has exhibited his works across Asia, Europe, Australia, and the United States. 

In 2005, Mr Puah founded Colours of Life, a community arts initiative that uses collaborative and community art to strengthen social bonds, promote well-being, and give marginalised groups a platform to express themselves. The initiative was officially opened by the late President S R Nathan and his wife. 

RDU said in its statement that Mr Puah brings a “deeply empathetic and community-grounded approach to politics”. 

“He believes in policies that support mental well-being, cultural inclusion, and holistic education – values he has long championed through his artistic and social practice,” the party added.

MARCUS NEO

The 33-year-old is a director of a boutique marketing agency serving law firms in Singapore.

RDU said in its statement that Mr Neo had experienced financial hardship growing up that “shaped his understanding of inequality”. 

He also believes that parliament must include more people with lived experience – those who “didn’t start from privilege but built their lives through grit, failure, and perseverance”, said the party. 

“With a background in data-driven marketing and a deep understanding of ground realities, Marcus hopes to bring fresh insights to policy making and champion long-term, inclusive solutions.”  

HARISH MOHANDAS 

Mr Harish, 39, is a principal software engineer who develops digital solutions for government and industry clients.

Prior to this, he was a civil engineer with over a decade of experience in Singapore’s built environment sector. Projects he has contributed to include Phase 2 of Singapore’s Deep Tunnel Sewerage System. 

Mr Harish also contributes to public discourse through opinion pieces published on socio-political news sites. 

“With first-hand experience in shaping modern Singapore’s infrastructure and a strong belief in evidence-based policy, he hopes to bring a forward-thinking, systems-driven approach to parliament – one that promotes resilience, equity, and long-term national wellbeing,” said RDU.

Continue Reading

US-China trade war stuck in a Prisoner’s Dilemma – Asia Times

It is tempting to interpret the situation as absurd brinkmanship as the US and China escalate their trade dispute through tit-for-tat levies.

However, beneath the surface, the routine resembles a well-known economics architecture, particularly the” Prisoner’s Dilemma” in sport idea, which is complicated by politics, national pride, and domestic politics ‘ experiences.

In the traditional Prisoner’s Dilemma, two players ( in this case, China and the US) have the option of cooperating ( lower tariffs, open trade ) or defying ( higher tariffs, trade restrictions ). The rewards are obvious:

  • If both parties cooperate, both parties gain and no one “loses mouth.”
  • If one cooperates but the other does not, the defector gains market share and a strategic advantage while the cooperator appears poor and suffers economically and socially.
  • If both suffer, both suffer, but at least neither “loses face” to the other.
Graphic: Author supplied

Mutually beneficial cooperation would undoubtedly be the most advantageous outcome, essentially economically. However, losing one’s experience in this situation has more serious repercussions.

For Beijing, being viewed as clinging to American force would not only damage its international standing but also its domestic social standing.

Being” hard on China” remains a significant political asset for Washington, especially under an leadership that is defined by its contextual design.

Time, respect, and Trump

This particular generation of the Prisoner’s Dilemma is much more complicated thanks to two more relationships.

Second, there is a terrible amount of trust. Due to President Trump’s well-known capriciousness, counterparties are rightly wary of any guarantees.

Depending on local political trends and lobbying preferences, deals may be reversed, tariffs can be raised without warning, and political logic frequently shifts.

Second, at least from China’s point of view, this is not a sport that repeats itself. Recurrent interactions, as explained in sport theory, encourage cooperation because each part is aware that several rounds will have the same consequences.

China is aware that it might only need one word or perhaps just another year of Trump’s administration to survive. There is little opportunity for Trump to generate significant agreements now that the US midterm elections are looming.

The safest move is to defect when the match is short-term, regardless of the broader economic value. Vietnam provides a somber illustration of what occurs when a player attempts to cooperate to first.

US officials flatly rejected Vietnam’s proposal to remove tariffs on US products, criticizing its trade deficit and accusing it of “dumping” cheap products like crab into the American market instead of rewarding the provide.

The training for China was clear: allowing too much time does not guarantee mercy. However, it might just entice more requirements.

More than just business

The effects of the joint dissolution extend far beyond the taxes themselves. Global supply chains are shifting as businesses try to diversify away from US- or China-centric types.

Rather, they are making investments in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and perhaps Africa, thinking of them as potential final-demand destinations rather than just as offshore producing bases. As nations look for alternatives in a fragmented global order, intra-Asian trade is growing.

In the US, political discourse has gotten more and more zero-sum: if China benefits, America may lose. This allows for the detail and compromise that are usually required by international trade agreements.

The price war is no longer simply an economic dispute as a result. It is a battle between political influence, pride, and narrative.

No simple way out

In a perfect world, both parties do acknowledge the harm done to one side and get a quick fix.

However, with trust waning, opportunities being misaligned, and the social cost of losing being always so great, common departure has turned into the Nash Equilibrium. Both sides want to scale up, and both would prefer to lose economically over appear weak.

The true horror is not just those in the taxes themselves. The root of distrust has been compromised, making teamwork more difficult both now and in the future. There are still two large options for breaking the damaging cycle: changing the paybacks and finding a face-saving leave.

The first is when departure turns out to be much more painful than assistance. This may occur if the social benefits of “looking hard” begin to outweigh the local costs of the tariff war, which include slower growth, inflation, declining exports, and a louder backlash from disturbed industries.

The second path is more psychological, but it is still significant. Both Trump and Xi have strongman personas, but neither is likely to back down without creating a compelling narrative that will prevent their faces from fading.

This might be a temporary truce that is characterized as a” strategic recalibration” or even cooperation in response to a larger crisis that draws attention and justifies de-escalation.

In essence, what’s needed is more than just a better deal; it needs a better story that allows both sides to retreat gracefully without appearing to have given in.

Continue Reading

China won’t rescue Cambodia from Trump’s tariffs – Asia Times

Cambodia’s first-quarter trade and investment data dropped in recent days, putting its US and China relations in statistical relief after Donald Trump imposed new 49% tariffs on the country.

According to the General Department of Customs and Excise (GDCE), in Q1 2025, China accounted for 49.1% of imports worth US$3.7 billion, up almost 31% from the same period last year.

Vietnam came in second place at 14.2%, followed by Thailand at 11.8%. All other countries were in the low single digits—the US, in 11th place, accounted for just 1% of Cambodia’s imports, valued at $78 million, which nonetheless was up 31%.

The US accounted for 35% of Cambodia’s exports (worth $2.4 billion, up 22% from the same period last year). Vietnam was second at 18.4%, although this figure was down almost a tenth. The other countries were in single digits. China, in third place, bought just 5% of Cambodia’s exports.

Knitted apparel accounted for 21% of exports and unknitted apparel for 14%. If all of the garment, footwear and travel goods are lumped together, they accounted for around 55% of all exports.

After this sector, agriculture was the second most important. Cereals accounted for 9%, edible fruits and nuts accounted for 6%, and vegetables for 4%.

As for Cambodia’s imports, oil and gas were by far the single largest import good, costing $961 million, or almost 13% of all imports. After that were the materials for the garment industry.

Now, let’s turn to investment. According to the Council for the Development of Cambodia, the country approved 172 projects with a combined value of $2.5 billion in the first three quarters of the year, up 14% in value from the same period in 2024.

Around 56% of all this investment was from China and 34% from Cambodia. The US came in 9th place, behind Samoa, and accounted for just 0.9% of overall investment. Last year, the CDC approved investments worth $6.9 billion.

So, all in all, things are looking healthy for Cambodia’s economy. Interestingly, $1.4 billion worth of investment, so more than half of the overall Q1 numbers, was approved in March, suggesting anything but a downturn, although this was before Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement.

The immediate picture is that Cambodia’s economy is bifurcated. China provides the bulk of the investment and imports, while the US purchases the lion’s share of Cambodia’s exports.

However, it’s more complicated than that, which ought to be remembered since oftentimes, when talking about Cambodia’s dependency on the US and China, there’s a notion that one can separate a reliance on the US for exports and dependence on China for imports and investment.

However, a significant percentage of Cambodia’s imports from China are raw materials stitched together in the country’s garment factories and then exported mostly to the US. The GDCE doesn’t break down import/export type by country but the OEC does.

In 2023, for instance, China accounted for around 60% of all the knitted fabric and cotton that Cambodia imported. That year, more than 45% of China’s exports to Cambodia were the raw materials for the garment sector, and probably another 10-20% was machinery or other products likely to be used by garment factories.

Meanwhile, the US purchased around a third of Cambodia’s garment exports and around 85% of all American imports from Cambodia were garment-related. Thus, if exports to America fall, Cambodia’s imports from China will also fall—and, most likely, Chinese investment in Cambodia as well.

Of the $6.9 billion worth of investment the CDC approved, the industrial sector (mostly garments) accounted for $4.8 billion. So, any downturn in garment exports would probably lead to a shortfall in Chinese investment.

More so, in fact, because Chinese companies are investing in other areas of the economy that are directly related to the manufacturing industry.

It’s a difficult estimate to make, but in 2020, the Ministry of Mines and Energy said that the garment manufacturing sector accounts for more than 40% of total electricity demand. There are also complaints that this sector still burns a lot of wood for energy.

So, there would be less demand for Chinese investment in the solar energy sector if Cambodia’s manufacturing industry takes a hit because of the US tariffs. The same would go for ports.

It isn’t obvious that a drop in Cambodian exports to the US will open up more opportunities for China to dominate Cambodia’s economy. After all, a bulk of Cambodia’s imports from China are garment-related, as is much of Chinese investment in Cambodia.

Moreover, other non-garment-related Chinese investment in Cambodia—from solar energy farms to ports and roads—is dependent on the country having a strong manufacturing and export-driven industry.

In other words, Beijing has a reason for not wanting the US to impose new high tariffs on Cambodia. Whether the Chinese Communist Party thinks about it that way, however, is another matter.

This article was first published on David Hutt’s Cambodia Unfiltered Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become a Cambodia Unfiltered subscriber here.

Continue Reading

EU shaping the future in Trump’s sustainability vacuum – Asia Times

Two of the most powerful governments in modern history chose flee over registration at a time when the world was searching for solid hands and shared direction.

The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union was the first, an action that was seen as usurping independence but widely accepted as a mistake in judgment. Britain relinquished its seat at the table, trading effect for isolation, rather than working from within to create the changing rules of international cooperation.

Donald Trump’s followers proclaimed his return to the White House as” Liberation Day.” The United States turned inward, reviving tariffs under the symbol of professional protection, instead of re-engaging the world with a new goal.

In a protectionist move intended to safeguard American work, sweeping new jobs were imposed on all imports this month. True power does not come from financial barricades, especially when those barricades isolate a country from the growing standards governing tomorrow’s trade and legitimacy.

The price is not just economic ( higher prices and stalled alliances ), but also spiritual: a lessening speech in shaping the shared potential.

These weren’t really social choices. The retreat of a once-shared responsibility to help navigate the world through clashing environment, injustice, and validity was the object of these abdications.

The pump they left behind is being filled, not with sound but with criteria, as frequently happens in past. A new style of international authority is emerging in Brussels ‘ calm corridors. Despite its flaws, the European Union has started transforming conservation into architecture.

Through initiatives like the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive ( CSRD), the Green Taxonomy, and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, Europe is institutionalizing what some people still view as aspirational. It is encoding sustainability rather than just defending it.

The EU is doing something dramatic: demanding evidence in a time when misleading is rife and Sustainable results are exceedingly mistrustworthy.

Over 50, 000 businesses operating in the region are required to give audited statements under CSRD, including non-European ones that cover everything from management and supply chains to pollution and human rights.

Not generosity, this is. It has provisional validity. You must demonstrate your support for a really, green future if you want to access one of the largest markets in the world.

What sets Europe apart is not its size, but rather its capacity to lead with principles. While people sabotage deal, Europe is using it to bolster confidence. Some increase walls, but it also erects systems. And perhaps most important, it transforms responsibilities into access.

However, Europe is not moving by itself. Japan has taken strong but understated actions to improve conservation. Its Sustainability Standards Board ( SSBJ) established the nation’s first IFRS-aligned sustainability disclosure standards, which cover both general and climate-related disclosures, in 2025. These regulations protect companies listed on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange from misinformation regarding climate risks, management, and pollution.

One of the most optimistic renewables goals among the G7 countries is Japan’s commitment to a 73 % decline in greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, in addition to its 2013 commitment. Although its approach may be silent, it is meticulous, thorough, and functionally revolutionary.

China is also changing its approach to sustainability on its words. It laid the groundwork for a federal ESG monitoring program that was compliant with international standards in the release of the Basic Standards for Corporate Sustainability Disclosure in late 2024.

This action strengthens its ability to guide green finance and trade policies and complements its SDG-aligned alternative classification. The Global Development Initiative is a reflection of China’s efforts to incorporate environmental and social indicators into its system diplomacy on a political degree.

Although its path is different from that of Europe, the message is undeniable: conservation is no longer a peripheral issue; it is becoming fundamental. This is more than just a European tale. Additionally, it isn’t just about adherence. It’s about consistency, really.

The effects are immediate and true for the nations in the Global South. Exporting never more revolves solely around cost. It’s about providing resistant. Manufacturers are being asked to demonstrate that their products have both price and principles, from cocoa producers in Ghana to Bangladeshi garment manufacturers.

This is not neocolonialist at all. It is a reflection. And it raises the following: Is we create a global market where access is earned through contributions rather than coercion? Where does validity derive from behaviour rather than from branding?

The solution, in our opinion, is yes. However, only if the systems being constructed are really diverse. The World South must not only abide by these standards, but also form them. Conservation may turn into another type of gatekeeping. It must develop into a common foundation, one that respects celestial boundaries while upholding development rights.

However, this developing architecture is brittle. Concerns about the recent delays in CSRD and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive ( CSDDD ) have been legitimate. The spectators are certainly concerned with the timeframes. They represent it, exactly. Beliefs can deteriorate because of fear. Standard lines may be blurry. And faith is wane.

Conservation as the foundation of international legitimacy is the new motto of Europe’s flag. The world may delay if it slows over. The world does prevent believing, however, if it reverses. And once lost, perception is much harder to regain than establishes.

Certainly the subject of the most popular speaker. It is about who holds regular when it’s most appealing to loosen. Leadership then rests on regularity, persistence, and staying put when difficulty hits.

Beyond bright ESG brochures, the world is changing. It is approaching the age of effect. the point when systems no longer only execute but must deliver. Europe’s position in that earth is crucial, but it is insufficient. The Global South’s legitimate demands, China’s reforming, and Japan’s solid hand had all come together.

The loudest, richest, or fastest can’t predict the future. It must be created by the most trustworthy people. Additionally, conservation is then given a new title.

Europe began to build filtering out of respect in a world where walls are built out of fear. However, protectors are necessary for frames as well. If Europe is currently sluggish, path is the only thing that stops. It’s not just rules. And course is everything in this fractious situation.

Setyo Budiantoro is a member of the Fair Finance Asia Advisory Committee, a MIT Sloan Fellow 2024, and a Nexus Strategist at The Prakarsa.

Continue Reading

Breaking growth barriers: Scale Up by Endeavor returns to empower Malaysia’s next wave of high-potential entrepreneurs

  • Applications are available from April 7 through May 2025.
  • Participants are given access to the Mission system, mentoring, and access to a founders ‘ community.

Scale Up by Endeavor Cohort 6 at their demo day & graduation ceremony last year

As Scale Up by Mission makes its sixth demographic debut, inviting ambitious founders to embark on a radical development journey, Malaysia’s entrepreneurial landscape is set to resurrect. The company stated in a statement that this lineup program is intended to help high-potential, early-stage businesses achieve flexible success.

Over 50 pioneering Indonesian startups, including CapBay, BloomThis, Kiddocare, Healthmetrics, and TRAPO, have been supported by Scale Up by Mission since its founding. These businesses have continued to receive substantial funding, grow regionally, and have a global impact. Undertaking Malaysia is now inviting the next generation of owners to add this elite group.

Why does Endeavor Scale Up?

Shan Li Tay, the program’s managing director for Endeavor Malaysia, describes the program as a “launchpad for owners major about scaling their companies with proper guidance.” She continues,” Founders gain valuable insights, accelerating their route to effective growth, and connections to Endeavor’s international network.”

Individuals in Cohort 6 may have access to:

  • A strong and enduring network of regional members, peers, instructors, and advisors, including leading business owners and entrepreneurs, is a part of the community.
  • Curated coaching: Up to four specialized mentoring sessions are included in the personalized, hands-on advice from seasoned business leaders.
  • Launchpad into Endeavor: Often the first brand for the network and network of Endeavor, the program encourages the world’s fastest-growing entrepreneurs to dream bigger, level faster, and give it back. It also shares Endeavor’s values and mission.

Making the way for Malaysia’s upcoming major success stories

The Scale Up by Mission program, &nbsp, played a significant role in developing our approach and connecting us with the appropriate people. Endeavor Entrepreneur Ang Xing Xian, co-founder & CEO of CapBay, an alumnus of Cohort 1, said,” So much so that we continued to participate in Endeavor’s Local Selection Panel ( LSP) and International Selection Panel ( ISP), where we gained even more value at each step.

” Completing both LSP and ISP gave us useful insights as well as access to outstanding officials and coaches, which have helped us size more quickly. We’re in a better position to make an impact in the finance sector with the support of Endeavor, he said.

For founders trying to navigate Malaysia’s active startup landscape, Scale Up by Endeavor has had the power to change their minds. ” We’ve seen amazing growth from our students, and we’re excited to welcome the following wave of creative members to join us,” said the president.

For this very competitive program, applicants from all sectors are encouraged to use. Software were started on April 7 and are tentatively scheduled to close on May 28. Click here for more information and to use.

Continue Reading