Ratan Tata, a giant of global industry, has died at 86 – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Ratan Tata, who has died at the age of 86, was a giant of global economy whose hobbies included cars, material, hotels, go and drink. Through his agency’s dedication to cultural reasons, he was recognized as a visionary whose labor extended far beyond the business world.

As the mind of Tata Group, an Indian company kingdom founded over 150 years previously, Tata became greatly intertwined with India’s business growth and political development. And he was instrumental in expanding the team’s international presence.

One of his most renowned accomplishments was Tata becoming one of the largest tea companies in the world by purchasing English drink business Tetley for £271 million in 2000.

It was a daring attempt to transform the Tata party from a burgeoning American company to a world force. The purchase of Jaguar Land Rover in 2008 was similar to this.

Tata saw ability in the American company despite the automaker’s financial difficulties at the time. He oversaw significant investment in style and technology, and his spend paid out. Tata Motors became a significant force in racing as new designs gained popularity abroad.

The US$ 12 billion order of Corus Steel in 2007, one of the largest coups in American business history, was yet another defining moment for Ratan Tata’s management.

Although the agreement raised issues, such as the changing price of steel and the economic downturns, it underlined Ratan Tata’s strategic plan to expand the company’s global footprint and his capacity to see past the group’s short-term gains and place an emphasis on group long-term development.

Not all of his ideas, of course, turned out well. He played a significant role in the development of the Tata Nano, which was supposed to be a less expensive and safer alternative to two-wheeled cars, in 2008.

Billed as the “world’s cheapest car”, it cost only over US$ 2, 000. However, the Nano was perhaps deserved better promotion and less rumors, and it was shut down in 2019. It continues to be a symbol of the revolutionary nature of the business and Ratan Tata’s commitment to making Indians better every day.

Philanthropy

The ethical business practices that make up the majority of the Tata Group’s earnings go toward humanitarian work in training, care, and medical studies also demonstrate that perspective.

The Tata Institute of Social Sciences is one of several Tata studies centers in India. Tata Trusts have even made contributions to organizations like Harvard Business School and the London School of Economics.

His philanthropic spirit was even displayed in times of crisis, especially after the Tata Group’s Taj Mahal Palace Hotel was attacked in 2008 in Mumbai. Eventually, Ratan Tata made sure that all impacted employees and guests received financial compensation and health care.

Tata Steel announced that it would continue providing wages and health gains to the people of Indian employees who passed away from the virus until the dying worker had turned 60 when Covid changed the world.

Ratan Tata’s compassion for those in need, as well as his willingness to assist people in times of crisis and to assist communities in need, strengthened his reputation as an industrialist who put the welfare of others at the center of his business.

Ratan Tata’s legacy as a “people’s industrialist” is cemented by his deep sense of responsibility toward improving the lives of ordinary people. ” I would like to be remembered as someone who made a difference, nothing more, nothing less”, he once said.

He will be remembered by many Indians as more. His charitable giving and inclusive approach to business have had a long-term and beneficial influence on India. And his ethical leadership, long-term vision, and deep compassion for others have cemented his reputation as a man who worked not just for profits, but for the betterment of society as a whole.

At the University of Essex, Professor Thankom Arun is professor of global development and accountability.

The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

The Nippon Steel deal: taking another look – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

” States have no friends – only interests”, or so goes the copied version of Lord Palmerston’s speech. That was so cynical – so 19th Century British Empire. But 170 years later, try buying another nation ‘s&nbsp, steel&nbsp, company and you might think Lord Palmerston was right. &nbsp,

Japan’s largest steel company, &nbsp, Nippon Steel, wants to acquire&nbsp, US Steel. It was a veritable example of American industrial might and technological prowess many decades ago. Less so these days.

United States President&nbsp, Joe Biden&nbsp, pronounced himself opposed to the deal. That was only two months after his love-fest with Japanese Prime Minister&nbsp, Fumio Kishida touting the strength of the&nbsp, Japan-US alliance: rock solid and based on shared mutual values.

The decision to approve or reject the agreement has been postponed until after the November election.

Both Senator JD Vance, the Republicans ‘ vice presidential candidate, and former president Donald Trump are against the deal.

If foreigners obtain US Steel, one might get the impression that the end of the republic is near. &nbsp,

The main reason given is national security.

Is there a problem with national security?

It is prudent for a nation to closely monitor its main industries and the owners of them. But maybe the biggest issue with the&nbsp, US Steel&nbsp, deal is that it’s embarrassing. &nbsp,

For one thing, people are nothing if not tribal. And who does n’t want the home team to succeed, on its own? &nbsp,

This case serves as an embarrassing reminder that America’s business and political elites have abandoned the nation’s manufacturing dominance over the past five decades by moving much of it overseas.

However, a little embarrassment can sometimes be helpful if it helps you grow.

And this is a deal where it pays to swallow one’s pride.

Not unusual, to say the least.

For one thing, the Japanese are our friends. And Nippon Steel’s proposal is not unprecedented.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group&nbsp, ( MUFG ) wrote a$ 9 billion USD check to save&nbsp, Morgan Stanley, the American financial icon and a key player in global capital markets. That was in 2008 when it was within hours of collapse. &nbsp,

Morgan Stanley’s life had a fresh start. The Japanese got a good investment while becoming the bank’s largest shareholder. And it has worked out well for both sides. Nowadays nobody even knows Morgan Stanley is Japanese-owned.

The Japanese, in effect, did this as a favor to the Americans. They stepped in to profit instead of letting the Wall Street company collapse due to the irresponsibility of its own making. They did n’t.

Does allowing foreigners to own a US company, however, put us in danger? &nbsp,

That depends on which foreigners and the particular agreement. &nbsp,

In this case, Japan is a longtime ally – and an excellent partner. Also, the deal benefits both nations.

Landing page for the United States Steel ( US Steel ) website. Photo: screenshot, October 7, 2024

A deal that leads to employment in the US

Japan’s existence as an independent country depends on the United States and the&nbsp, US military. &nbsp,

Tokyo is well aware of that. &nbsp,

A weak America poses a threat to Japan.

Investing in US&nbsp, Steel&nbsp, and modernizing it will create great-paying jobs in the US. Importantly, it will give Japan a strategic asset that the United States has neglected and provides insurance for its survival. &nbsp,

Opponents have n’t produced a believable scenario in which Nippon Steel would ( or could ) shut down US steel production. Or in which it could create any political brouhaha that would endanger the essential&nbsp, US-Japan relationship&nbsp, and defense coverage.

As importantly, Japanese investment has been good for the nation. &nbsp,

jobs in Japan come from manufacturing

Toyota, &nbsp, Nissan and&nbsp, Honda&nbsp, are just the most well-known Japanese companies in America. Moreover, they support over 450, 000&nbsp, manufacturing&nbsp, jobs in the United States. &nbsp,

In addition to its significant research and development operations, Japan is the top overall foreign investor in the US.

The litmus test: Americans want to work for Japanese companies. And union organizers struggle to persuade them that they are unhappy.

Does anyone recall the 1980s, when Japan and its businesses were vilified on Capitol Hill and other locations? We were all going to turn into slaves as Japan seized control of our nation and economy. &nbsp,

Hardly.

However, it seems as though what is being said now will happen to American workers if Nippon Steel buys US Steel. Lose jobs, pensions, everything. &nbsp,

Actual US Steel employees support Nippon Steel’s efforts to modernize and strengthen its workforce, which is less well known.

China Ties?

Listen to deal opponents and one would think Nippon Steel were conspiring with the&nbsp, People’s Republic of China&nbsp, to destroy a US company.

Like many other companies, Nippon Steel has business dealings in the PRC. &nbsp,

These should be carefully and precisely weighed against actual security risks. And not shaded to keep the United Steelworkers&nbsp, union bosses happy.

If necessary, Nippon Steel should be required to modify or even end any China operations. &nbsp,

And so should &nbsp, Boeing, General Electric, Ford, GM, &nbsp, Tesla, Honeywell and the hundreds of other American companies in the China market. They have done far more than Nippon Steel to build up the&nbsp, Chinese economy&nbsp, and the People’s Liberation Army over the last four decades.

US sailors prepare to transport the wreckage of the Chinese ‘ spy balloon’ on February 10, 2023, in Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA. Photo: US Navy

Remember the Chinese&nbsp, spy balloon&nbsp, that flew over America in 2023? You might have noticed that the Biden administration refused to release a report on the findings. A likely reason is that the balloon’s innards had American components. &nbsp,

Is racism a cause of the deal’s opposition?

Probably.

If a British company were attempting to purchase US Steel, one doubts that we would be in this discussion. Does anyone care that the Italians and the French own Chrysler, you ask? &nbsp, Also, there is an air of “yellow peril” in some of the&nbsp, commentary.

However, the racism angle is a wash in this case. Take a look at the days when it appeared Renault would overtake Nissan. Company executives and Japanese government officials effectively took Nissan Chairman&nbsp, Carlos Ghosn&nbsp, hostage via charges of corporate misconduct. Furthermore, along with him, they arrested a senior executive, &nbsp, Greg Kelly, an American.

Avoid bringing up resentments between the US and Japan by remembering that they are friends. They need to stay focused on defending themselves.

Use Japan to rekindle US Steel’s greatness?

This would n’t be the first time.

In the 1970s and 1980s, American automakers were losing billions and producing subpar automobiles. Just look up “K-Car” on the internet. Detroit was in fact forced to get its act together by the Japanese.

Furthermore, Japan backed off and gave the American carmakers the breathing space to get their acts together.

Was that embarrassing? Sure. Infuriating? Sometimes. And there was occasionally excessive gloating from Japan.

But it worked out pretty well for everyone.

Damage Done?

Do n’t think Japan is n’t irked by Nippon Steel’s treatment. Japan has always felt uneasy about the commitment made by the United States.

Tokyo wo n’t be mollified by lines like” This is just business” or” This is just politics”.

Japan might start to wonder how trustworthy an ally the US is. &nbsp,

And maybe the US administration decides it ca n’t defend Japan when the Chinese start to be brutal with it. Nothing personal, and we still love you. However, an election is about to take place or ( fill in the blank ).

If the Nippon Steel deal is rejected, the alliance wo n’t collapse. But it will leave a scar, instead of deepening and strengthening the US-Japan relationship.

Early 20th century US Steel coal miners including the author’s grandfather, Mike Hlohinecz ( far left ). Photo: ©Grant Newsham family

The writer’s grandfather, Michal Hlohinecz, was a miner in one of the US Steel coal mines many years ago. What would he think of all of this? I have no idea. But he might have taken some offense at the idea that “foreigners” are the problem.

And the Japanese are not the cause of the Nippon Steel deal.

Former US diplomat and former US Marine officer Grant Newsham. He is the author of the book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/When-China-Attacks-Warning-America/dp/1684513650″ target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>When China Attacks: A Warning To America.

This article was first published by Japan Forward. It is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

Noel Tata: Ratan Tata’s brother named new chairman of Tata trusts

By:
On:
In: Asia

A day after the death of India’s most globally-recognised tycoon Ratan Tata, his half-brother Noel Tata has been named as the new chairperson of Tata Trusts, media reports say.

Tata Trusts is the company’s philanthropic arm which holds a majority stake of 66 % in Tata Sons- one of India’s largest business groups, with annual revenues in excess of$ 100bn ( £76.5bn ).

Noel Tata, 76, is the son of Naval Tata, who was also Ratan’s parents, and Simone Tata.

He is on the planks of some Tata companies, including Tata Trusts, and will now move up to lead its organizations.

He serves as vice-chairman of Tata Steel and Titan Company Limited and the president of Tata International Limited, Voltas, and Tata Investment Corporation.

He likewise heads Tata’s large clothing retail business, Trent Limited, which has seen huge growth since he took its authority in 2014.

The business has established a number of highly effective fashion and lifestyle wholesale outlets, including Utsa, Zudio, and Westside.

Noel Tata served as the group’s global trading and distribution company, Tata International, from 2010 to 2021, and during this period, the company’s revenue increased from$ 500 million to over$ 3 billion.

CNBC reported on Friday that Noel Tata had been chosen overwhelmingly by Tata Trusts as its president.

Noel Tata’s three children serve on the board of some of the family’s charitable organizations.

His brother Neville is nose of Star Bazaar, the team’s chain of retail stores. Leah Tata, his daughter, is in charge of The Indian Hotels Company, which operates the Gateway product. His another daughter, Maya Tata, works at Tata Digital.

Ratan Tata had not been married, had no children, and had not formally chosen a successor. His death had piqued common interest in a person who would succeed him in taking over the Tata Trusts.

In 2012, he stepped down as the chairman of Tata Sons, handing over the reigns to Cyrus Mistry. Mistry was unavoidably fired in 2016, and Tata resurrected as time chair for a few years in 2016. In 2017, N Chandrasekaran was named chair, a post he also holds.

Ratan Tata next served as the group’s president professor, a position he held until his passing. He served as the charitable arm’s chair until the end.

Continue Reading

Ways to break China’s legacy chip hold – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

Back in June, the Federation of American Scientists teamed up with Noahpinion, ChinaTalk, and Chris Miller to hold a crowdsourced policy competition.

We asked for ideas on how to deal with the problem of China potentially controlling the supply of foundational chips (also called “trailing-edge” semiconductors). Here was the post where we made the announcement:

The US has implemented export controls to try to stop China from getting a technological edge in advanced cutting-edge chips. But as I explained in a recent post, export controls have no hope of stopping China from building simpler types of chips — called “legacy chips”, “foundational chips”, or “trailing-edge chips.” These legacy chips are used for a huge number of things in our economy, from cars to smartphones to fighter jets.

And China is gearing up to build these legacy chips in absolutely staggering numbers. Check out this post by Jimmy Goodrich of the University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation and this post by the Rhodium Group for details. Basically, China is applying the same approach to legacy chips that it has successfully applied to batteries and EVs — massive scale and enormous subsidies. Already,

This basically presents at least three potential dangers to the US:

  1. First, China could deprive non-Chinese chipmakers of huge amounts of revenue by outcompeting them in the legacy chip market, making it harder for them to sustain their leading-edge chip businesses. Already investors are pressuring US companies to avoid competing with China by canceling their semiconductor fabs.
  • Second, if China controls the legacy chip market, it could cut off our supply of chips in a war.
  • Third, Chinese security services might be able to put back doors into Chinese-made chips, using them to spy or even to attack US infrastructure.

In other words, there are plenty of national security reasons for keeping Chinese-made legacy chips out of our supply chain. But how can we do it? It’s a tough problem.

First of all, as things stand, we don’t even know which products contain Chinese-made chips. If a Vietnamese-made phone or a Mexican-made PC includes Chinese-made legacy chips, the US currently has no way of knowing.

Second, even if we did know, it might be politically unpopular to ban those chips. A lot of US companies want to get chips as cheaply as possible, especially for new AI applications. We’d need some way to make chip restrictions politically palatable.

And finally, lots of Chinese legacy chips — and the products that contain them — aren’t going to be sold in the US or our allied countries. How do we make sure non-Chinese chipmakers stay competitive in markets like Vietnam, Brazil, Indonesia, etc?

We asked contestants to give us their ideas for addressing this problem. In the end, we decided that four of the submissions we received really stood out. These winners are listed in alphabetical order by first author.

Winner #1: Weaponizing EDA and using targeted industrial policy

By: Zenghao (Mike) Gao, Charles Yockey, and Felipe Chertouh

Gao et al point out an important weapon in the US’ arsenal of export controls that hasn’t been used yet: Electronic design automation software (EDA). We hear a lot about where the production of chips happens, and some about where the production of chipmaking tools happens, but not very much about where the software used to design chips comes from.

In fact, almost all of it comes from America, with a little bit coming from US-allied countries like Japan and Australia. And this software doesn’t just design chips in the first place; it’s also what chipmakers use to correct problems with the fabrication process as they arise.

Gao et al. suggest that EDA could be “weaponized” by mandating that it run on US-based cloud servers:

In hosting all EDA in a US-based cloud—for instance, a data center located in Las Vegas or another secure location—America can force China to purchase computing power needed for simulation and verification for each chip they design. This policy would mandate Chinese reliance on US cloud services to run electromagnetic simulations and validate chip design.

Under this proposal, China would only be able to use the latest EDA software if such software is hosted in the US, allowing American firms to a) cut off access at will, rendering their technology useless and b) gain insight into homegrown Chinese designs built on this platform.

Since such software would be hosted on a US-based cloud, Chinese users would not download the software which would greatly mitigate the risk of foreign hacking or intellectual property theft.

While the United States cannot control chips outright considering Chinese production, it can control where they are integrated. A machine without instructions is inoperable, and the United States can make China’s semiconductors obsolete.

This idea wouldn’t stop China from making foundational chips — Chinese companies could still use American EDA software. But it might give the US one more piece of leverage to hold over China in case hostilities broke out — and another way to try to slow down the Chinese chip industry in general, if that becomes necessary.

On the defensive side of things, Gao et al. also call for the US to form a trade bloc with Latin American nations to ensure safe supply of rare earths and NAND memory. They also have some additional ideas, such as forcing Chinese companies to release the source code for the firmware and other software for their chips.

You can read Gao et al’s full policy proposal here.

Winner #2: Working with other countries on industrial policies and tariffs

By: Andrew Lee

Lee sees the creation of a non-China foundational chip supply chain as the central problem to be solved. He envisions a program modeled after Lend-Lease — the system by which the US delivered arms to the UK in World War 2, and by which it’s currently delivering arms to Ukraine. The program would license US technology cheaply to friends and allies in exchange for cooperation in creating completely China-free chip supply chains:

The United States Federal Government could negotiate with the “Big Three” EDA firms to purchase transferable licenses to their EDA software. The US could then “lend-lease” licenses to major semiconductor producers in partner countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, the Philippines, or even Latin America.

The US could license this software on the condition that products produced by such companies will be made available at discounted prices to the American market, and that companies should disavow further investment from or cooperation with Chinese entities.

Partner companies in the Indo-Pacific could further agree to share any further research results produced using American IP, making further advancements available to American companies in the global market.

(Side note: It occurs to me that this might dovetail well with Gao et al.’s proposal for putting EDA on a US-based cloud.)

Lee also suggests coordinating with friendly countries in order to put tariffs on Chinese foundational chips. Recall that one of the big challenges here is that we don’t currently know which products contain Chinese-made chips, so we have no idea how many we’re importing.

Lee’s solutions to this problem are 1) an international database of which products contain Chinese chips, and 2) reporting requirements for importers, enforced by random audits:

How would tariffs on final goods containing Chinese chips be enforced? The policy issue of sanctioning and restricting an intermediate product is, unfortunately, not new. It is well known that Chinese precursor chemicals, often imported into Mexico, form much of the raw inputs for deadly fentanyl that is driving the United States opioid epidemic.

Taking a cue from this example, we further suggest the creation of an internationally-maintained database of products manufactured using Chinese semi- conductors. As inspiration, the National Institutes of Health/NCATS maintains the Global Substance Registration System, a database that categorizes chemical substances, along with their commonly used names, regulatory classification, and relationships with other related chemicals.

Such a database could be administered by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security, allowing the personnel who enforce the tariffs to also collect all relevant information in one place.

Companies importing products into the US would be required to register the make and model of all Chinese chips used in each of their products, so that the United States and participating countries could to impose corresponding sanctions.

Products imported to the US would be subject to random checks involving disassembly in Commerce Department workshops, with failure to report a sanctioned semiconductor component making a company subject to additional tariffs and fines. Manual disassembly is painstaking and difficult, but regular, randomized inspections of imported products are the only way to truly verify their content.

Finally, he suggests efforts to protect US critical infrastructure by 1) identifying Chinese hardware within the infrastructure, and 2) improving cyber defense capabilities.

You can read Lee’s full policy proposal here.

Winner #3: An “Open Foundational” design standard and buyers’ group

By: Alex Newkirk

Newkirk also sees Chinese disruption of the chip supply chain — along with possible backdoors and other security issues — as the main problem to be solved. He proposes two ideas. First, Newkirk would create an “Open Foundational” design standard for legacy chips, in order to ensure that China doesn’t get proprietary control over any type of computer chip.

The chip companies who joined up to help create this standard would form a sort of cartel that could act to create a China-free manufacturing supply chain. Newkirk also suggests an international buyers’ group to create a strategic reserve of chips. This would serve the dual purpose of building up a chip stockpile and providing demand to encourage the adoption of the Open Foundational design standard. He writes:

To secure supply of foundational chips, I recommend development of an “Open Foundational” design standard and buyers’ group…[T]he US federal government…would establish a strategic microelectronics reserve to ensure access to critical chips. This reserve would be initially stocked through a multi-year advanced market commitment for Open Foundational devices. 

The foundational standard would be a voluntary consortium of microelectronics users in critical sectors, inspired by the Open Compute Project. It would ideally contain firms from critical sectors such as enterprise computation, automotive manufacturing, communications infrastructure, and others.

The group would initially convene to identify a set of foundational devices which are necessary to their sectors…and identify design features which…could be standardized.  From these, a design standard could be developed…

Steering committee firms will…be asked to commit some fraction of future designs to use Open Foundational microelectronics…[T]he buyers’ group would represent demand of sufficient scale to motivate investment, and that supply would be more robust to disruptions once mature. 

Government should adopt the standard where feasible, to build greater resilience in critical systems if nothing else. This should be accompanied by a diplomatic effort for key democratic allies to partner in adopting these design practices in their defense applications.

The foundational standard should seek geographic diversity in suppliers…The foundational standard also allows firms to de-risk their suppliers as well as themselves. They can stipulate in contracts that their tier one suppliers need to adopt Foundational Standards in their designs…

Having developed the open standard through the buyers’ group, congress should authorize the purchase through the Department of Commerce a strategic microelectronics reserve (SMR). Inspired by the strategic petroleum reserve, the microelectronics reserve is intended to provide the backstop foundational hardware for key government and societal operations during a crisis…

The foundational standard provides the product specification, and the advanced government commitment provides demand…This demand should be steady, with regular annual purchases at scale, ensuring producers consistent demand through the ebbs and flows of a volatile industry….The SMR could also serve as a backstop when supply fluctuations do occur, as with the strategic petroleum reserve…

This would ensure government access to core computational capabilities in a disaster or conflict scenario. But as all systems are built on a foundation, the SMR should begin with Foundational Standard devices. 

It’s notable how Newkirk’s ideas support each other. The international chip design standard he would create would make it easier to build up a stockpile of reliable chips. And building up the stockpile would create the guaranteed demand that would encourage adoption of the design standard.

That’s a very clever synergy. And as an added bonus, the consortium of companies that create and run the foundational chip standard would also be able to help carry out friend-shoring and de-risking, instead of leaving all the planning to the government.

You can read Newkirk’s full policy proposal here.

Winner #4: A legal plan for blocking Chinese chips

By: Ben Noon

Noon focuses on the difficult problem of identifying and restricting Chinese-made foundational chips contained within US imports from other countries. He vividly lays out the dangers of allowing China to control the foundational chip industry:

The list of examples of Chinese economic coercion is long…Washington faces less blatant coercion compared to its allies…This may be because Beijing does not believe it yet maintains necessary leverage over Washington…China’s growing position in the legacy semiconductor market could change that. How would Beijing’s behavior change if sales of the Ford F-150 relied on Beijing’s willingness to sell its semiconductors?

Noon argues that export controls have little or no hope of containing the Chinese foundational chip industry. And he argues that CHIPS Act-type subsidies alone are insufficient to maintain a US foothold in the market because Chinese subsidies will always be larger. Thus, he concludes, protectionism is necessary in order to keep China from dominating the global market for foundational chips.

The question, of course, is how to restrict imports of Chinese foundational chips contained in other products. Noon goes through and explains a list of various legal and administrative vehicles that the US government has at its disposal to accomplish that task:

  • Investigation of and restrictions on imported goods linked to unfair trade practices
  • Federal government purchasing restrictions
  • The Office of Information and Communications Technology and

Services (ICTS) at the Commerce Department, a recently created agency with broad authority to protect critical infrastructure from dangerous imported products

Noon believes that the most important legal justification for tariffs on Chinese chips is Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which both Trump and Biden have used extensively in order to put tariffs on Chinese products.

The really tough question, of course, is enforcement. Noon recommends “a major expansion of supply chain analytical capabilities across the US government,” but doesn’t say much more about that. He also suggests enlisting private companies as whistleblowers.

You can read Noon’s full policy proposal here.

Anyway, all of these proposals are quite interesting, and we’ve already contacted the authors to talk about following up on their development. I was very impressed by the diversity of ideas here — different contributors targeted different aspects of the problem, which helped them come at the issue from a variety of angles.

I continue to be impressed by the creativity and technical acumen of Noahpinion readers. Expect more policy contests at some point in the future!

This article was first published on Noah Smith’s Noahpinion Substack and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here and become a Noahopinion subscriber here.

Continue Reading

Parliament to discuss East-West Line disruption, school bullying and Dyson layoffs

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

In light of recent high-profile incidents, members of Parliament will discuss the East-West Line ( EWL ) disruption at the upcoming session on Monday ( October 14 ).

There were also questions filed on the&nbsp,” shock” layoffs conducted by Dyson&nbsp, last year, while the planned&nbsp, public transport suffer climb, and the&nbsp, implications of former transport secretary S Iswaran’s criminal faith and later 12-month prison term&nbsp, are on the plan.

MPs were asked about the causes of the EWL coach disruption, which started on September 25, along with more information about the incident, and what steps will be taken to stop such disruptions in the future, according to the order papers released on Friday.

Six weeks after a malfunctioning train caused a energy trip, damage to the track, and other technology while it was transferring to Ulu Pandan Depot, train companies between Jurong East and Buona Vista MRT channels were suspended for six weeks. During the disturbance, completely bridge cars were stationed every day. &nbsp,

MP Poh Li San ( PAP-Sembawang ), questioned whether the faulty train was withdrawn in accordance with approved procedures, as well as the number of affected commuters in total, the estimated loss in revenue from the fares, and the total cost of the bridging bus services.

MP Yip Hon Weng ( PAP-Yio Chu Kang ) inquired about whether the Ministry of Transport would conduct a comprehensive review of the MRT network to prevent and minimize service disruptions, and whether penalties would be imposed on the train service providers.

MPs Gerald Giam ( WP-Aljunied ) wanted to know the end-of-life date for the 48 first-generation MRT trains which have been in service for 35 years, as well as the maintenance regime of these trains, given that the EWL line disruption was caused by an axle box falling off a first-generation train.

In relation to the EWL disturbance, 19 questions have been submitted in full.

In light of recent MRT disruptions, Mr. Giam also inquired about whether the Public Transport Council ( PTC ) will consider revising the proposed fare increase for Dec. 28.

Additionally, inquiries were made about bullying at schools, with two popular scenarios involving Qihua Primary School and Bukit View Secondary School.

MP Wan Rizal ( PAP-Jalan Besar ) asked whether teachers are” sufficiently equipped” with the knowledge and skills to identify and manage bullying, especially in cases where victims do not report incidents.

He even wanted to know what steps are being taken to make sure schools have enough qualified workers, such as counselors, to assist teachers and students in handling taunting cases.

MP Liang Eng Hwa ( PAP-Bukit Panjang ) was interested in knowing how well schools and the Singapore Police Force collaborate when bullying occurs on grounds other than in the classroom.

He Ting Ru ( WP-Sengkang ) and MP Louis Chua ( WP-Sengkang ) both inquired about the breakdown between online and offline bullying incidents reported to schools over the past five years.

Layoff, PUBLIC TRANSPORT FARE ADJUSTMENTS

Cutbacks were the subject of inquiries about whether the Ministry of Manpower’s laws will be strengthened to better manage upcoming layoffs.

Technology business Dyson conducted a square of cuts in Singapore, which serves as its world offices, on Oct 1. The United Workers of Electronics and Electrical Industrie, the appropriate union, and some MPs who were present at the meeting gave the appropriate union just one week notice of the downsizing training.

MP Tan Wu Meng ( PAP-Jurong ) inquired about whether the Ministry of Manpower ( MOM) would examine the short notice given by Dyson and how Singapore can” continue to be pro-enterprise and attract investment while adhering to tripartite best practices.”

Mr. Yip was interested in finding out if MOM will review and improve existing methods in order to better manage upcoming retrenchments, including making sure unions are given more proper notice. &nbsp,

He likewise wanted to know what steps the government is taking to” simultaneously encourage foreign companies to maintain their appearance in Singapore while safeguarding the security of employees.” &nbsp,

MPs asked for more information about the changes to the bus and train fares that were scheduled for Dec 28 and the economic viability of the public transportation system.

In addition to the ministry’s evaluation of potential scenarios for fare adjustments in the next review, MP&nbsp, Saktiandi Supaat ( PAP-Bishan-Toa Payoh ) was interested in learning how the deferment of the remaining fare quantum will impact funding for planned service improvements or infrastructure projects.

Ms. Poh also wanted to know how Singapore compares to other large cities with comparable public transportation systems, like Hong Kong and Seoul, in terms of increase in the cost of transportation over the past four years.

ISWARAN, QOO10&nbsp,

Other inquiries made by MPs included whether Singapore’s anti-corruption laws should be revised to improve their effectiveness in the wake of Iswaran’s sentence, and if, as a matter of fact, the Penal Code definition qualifies as a “public servant” for an offence under section 165 of the Penal Code.

There was also queries on&nbsp, rent prices, following a record bid for a Marine Parade hawker stall last month as well as&nbsp, Qoo10.

Shopping on the e-commerce platform has been&nbsp, effectively halted amid payment delays to its vendors, prompting&nbsp, some frustrated merchants to turn to a claims tribunal for help. &nbsp,

The Elections ( Integrity of Online Advertising ) ( Amendment ) Bill is scheduled for its second reading. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

Malaysia Digital status companies delivering synergy and growth through AI

By:
On:
In: Technology
  • MD companies, DataMicron, Tapway, PIXLR Group leading the way in AI imports
  • MDEC is working with various authorities to promote AI development.

Launch of the Artificial Intelligence Governance and Ethics guidelines by Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation (MOSTI) with, 2nd from left, Chang Lih Kang, Mosti Minister; Fadillah Yusof (3rd left), Deputy Prime Minister and Gobind Singh Deo (2nd right), Minister of Digital.

Artificial intelligence ( AI ) seems to be at the top of the recent discussion topic list, with various parties humming its benefits as a game changer for almost every industry, from banking to manufacturing, and more. While some naysayers had labeled it as another term, it is actually more prevalent in Malaysia as a result of how AI affects how we work, live, and sing than we initially believed.

AI has become a vital driver for a number of development sectors, starting with the development of 5G infrastructure to support rapid growth and to knowledge, where expertise and skill are increasingly needed.

The Malaysian government has encouraged the development of AI in Malaysia through the National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap ( 2022 ) and the recently released AIGE guidelines, which acknowledge the transformative potential of AI.

Numerous tech entrepreneurs have made the decision to enter the field of AI, creating solutions and services that span a range of industries, from logistics management to modern creative. Discovering how as a society can develop with AI to produce newer and more powerful offerings to industry seems to be endless.

Three Malaysian Digital ( MD) status companies that are actively participating in the Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation’s ( MDEC ) Digital Exports program provide a look at the diverse uses of AI.

Gobind together with Jimmy Ting, CEO of DataMicron at the Malaysia Digital Tech Adoption Summit: Artificial Intelligence.

AI for important determination making

By providing critical cloud-based options to large corporations in Malaysia, DataMicron has established itself as a important leader in amazing analytics platforms. They collaborate with a number of well-known and internationally recognized manufacturing firms with a sizable center in the nation.
By incorporating AI into their service, their options not only maintain high consistency but also enable lightning-fast Big Data analytics. This gives businesses better information about supply chain management and budget reduction, and it may also act as a strategic warning to businesses to increase their overall production efficiency.

The business understood that using more accurate data and Internet of Things ( IOT ) as a key innovation tool would enable its clients to grow and expand. Decision makers have benefited from DataMicron’s assistance in maximizing opportunities and creating proactive strategies to protect them from risks, such as possible failures and another supply chain disruptions.

Better perception with AI in film systems

In addition to improving safety and general computerized safety functions, several businesses in Malaysia have benefited from combining AI with physical technology and IOT. A difference between the physical and digital earth was discovered by Tapway, a top AI solutions provider in the area, and was bridged by the use of AI and IOT combined.

The company launched its VisionTrack lately, a program that automates value checks and uses Samurai, a vision Iot option for businesses. Here, AI provides tracking during the manufacturing process to ensure that their clients ‘ equipment lines are operating correctly and correctly, as well as ensuring health around manufacturing facilities.

Additionally, Tapway has just been appointed as the seller for all of Malaysia’s burden plazas, helping to keep track of traffic and provide efficiency reports for road transportation. Their combined use of AI and collected data in this case improves road users ‘ total efficiency and provides crucial information to the burdens management company.

The business keeps making investments in new AI plugins, extending its portfolio of AI visible technologies to include a wide range of industries and applications. They believe more businesses in Malaysia should look into AI to improve their overall service delivery and that they want to continue to be a companion for local business development.

Innovative and AI – providing motivation

The Pixlr Group is embracing AI as a part of its collection of options for artists, designers, and marketeers, and continues to make leaps in the market. The business was founded as INMAGINE with the aim of democratizing creative material and encouraging designers around the world.

Important goals include the development of 123RF, one of the world’s largest electronic stock picture libraries. The company’s recognition of the potential impact of AI on the way artists and designers approach visual design appeared to be normal. Pixlr then began its development into AI-driven innovative tools and aimed to establish an AI lover for artists and marketers by enhancing the design, management, and distribution of digital assets.

Warren Leow (2nd from right), CEO of Pixlr sharing his thoughts on an AI panel at the recent PJ Startup Festival 2024.

AI has transformed the way digital assets are created, managed, and distributed by automated methods and enhancing imagination. This has resulted in synergies within the creative ecology because it enables users to produce higher-quality information more quickly and effectively, leading to innovation across a variety of industries.

AI to alter the country

It is obvious that AI is still around and will continue to be a valuable resource that will aid people, businesses, and the economy’s growth. While some people have reservations about the technology, MDEC is prepared to support it by working with the various authorities to continue to build a friendly network made up of technical talent, infrastructure, and partnership to help.

While some dread AI and its controversies, MDEC, the world’s lead company in modern transformation, is positive in the benefits it brings to the nation. It automates the lower-income jobs and encourages Malaysians to seek high-income jobs, creating more skilled workers and enabling its goal of being a high-income country before 2030. Local businesses will be able to participate in this AI journey with continued support from initiatives like the MD Founder’s Centre of Excellence ( FOX ).

For Malaysian electronic standing companies, MDEC offers a variety of programs. Apply for the position of Malaysia Digital around.

Continue Reading

watchTowr raises US mil to redefine External Attack Surface Management

By:
On:
In: Technology
  • Total funding for the most recent investment is$ 29 million.
  • Funds will be used to get business management, accelerate global development

watchTowr raises US$19 mil to redefine External Attack Surface Management

watchTowr, the cybersecurity startup redefining External Attack Surface Management, has announced a US$ 19 million ( RM81 million ) Series A funding round led by Peak XV, formerly known as Sequoia India &amp, Southeast Asia, with repeat participation from Prosus Ventures and Cercano Management. In a statement, the firm said it would use the money to get business management and accelerate global development by expanding its go-to-market, study, and engineering teams. This latest investment brings its total funding to US$ 29 million ( RM124 million ).

WatchTower reports that Fortune 500 companies and critical equipment companies have embraced it over the past year as major recipients of its security measures.

It stated that as AI develops, the number and frequency of achievements that are affecting big firms is rapidly growing. Animal experts and conventional security products cannot be used to combat the rapidity of these attacks. WatchTowr, which was created by unpleasant security experts, recreates the ingenuity and resilience of attackers, enabling organizations to respond quickly to new techniques and threats. The company’s app even constructs a real-time assailant’s view of an organisation, constantly identifying and validating accessible vulnerabilities before attacks occur.

watchTowr was founded by hacker-turned-entrepreneur Benjamin Harris ( pic ). Harris, who hacked into his university system at the age of 16, has established a remarkable reputation in the cybersecurity sector over the past 14 years. Since therefore, he has helped businesses all over the world improve their security methods and defenses.

” If there’s a way to bargain your company, watchTowr may get it”, said Harris, CEO and Founder of watchTowr. ” In the last 12 months, our projections have been realised. Intruders have become faster at weaponising emerging threats, more violent at leveraging weaknesses to sacrifice organisations blindly, and occasion to abuse in the wild is then measured in single-digit hours. We strongly believe that security team can use one of the most potent skills to quickly respond to these threats.

Backed by the company’s study, the watchTowr System is the fastest to utilize the latest vulnerabilities, tactics, and techniques used by powerful adversaries, enabling organisations to check their defences. watchTowr Laboratories, the agency’s danger and risk R&amp, D shoulder, has become internationally renowned. It recently demonstrated how significant amounts of Internet infrastructure have been compromised, and in February 2024, it was the first to use Ivanti’s Connect Secure VPN product ( CVE-2024-22024 ) to investigate and reproduce vulnerabilities that APT groups have used to compromise western government entities. WatchTower has consistently been the first to analyze many of the most serious risks in 2024.

In addition to the money, the firm announced the appointment of Chris Merritt, past Cloudflare president of Field Operations &amp, general income officer, to its board of directors to link watchTowr’s global growth. Merritt spent over ten years at Cloudflare, helping the company scale to over US$ 1 billion ( RM4.2 billion ) in annual recurring revenue. He currently runs Peak XV as an operating partner.

“watchTowr has an incredible team, technology, and opportunity”, said Merritt. ” They’re solving a major challenge for global organisations by enabling them to view their systems like trained adversaries, validate weaknesses, and help stop breaches—at scale. WatchTowr is seeing a lot of interest, and we look forward to helping Harris and the rest of the team become the next cybersecurity market leader.

Continue Reading

Trump’s China tariffs won’t make America great again – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Donald Trump is urging the government to impose a 60 % tax on products made in China and a 20 % tariff on imports from other countries as part of his” Make America Great Again” plan.

His rationale seems easy: tariffs will increase American jobs, lower the federal deficit, reduce food prices and yet generate revenues to subsidize childcare. &nbsp, But the former mayor’s supposed all-purpose business repair is inherently flawed.

Trump’s proposed tariffs aim to increase factory work in the US by increasing the cost of international items and encouraging domestic production, one of Trump’s main promises.

In principle, this sounds attractive, but the reality is much more difficult. However, history shows that tariffs often lead to long-term career development in professional sectors. &nbsp,

In fact, many US firms that relied on imported material elements were forced to raise rates or hire employees as a result of Trump’s taxes after the US government imposed them in 2018. &nbsp,

The taxes led to short-term problems, but they did n’t result in a lasting boost in manufacturing jobs.

Rather, businesses frequently automated tasks to reduce costs or relocate to lower-wage nations without the same tariff regulations.

Fast forward to the current, and Trump’s proposed 60 % tariffs on Chinese-made products will not prevent American firms from seeking cheaper options abroad. &nbsp,

Many US companies would just change their purchasing to nations like Vietnam, India, or Mexico to prevent paying the innovative 60 % taxes because global supply chains are more efficient than ever.

Chinese manufacturers can avoid tariffs by working with companies in other countries and labeling their goods as” Made in Vietnam” or” Made in Mexico” despite Trump’s claim that it is his main adversary in his trade dispute.

So, tariffs on China wo n’t bring back jobs to the US; instead, they’ll probably just move them abroad.

The false promise that tariffs will decrease US food prices is another major weakness in Trump’s price plan. &nbsp, Ultimately, tariffs are a tax on exports and the problem of those fees almost generally falls back on customers. &nbsp,

When taxes are imposed on goods that Americans frequently consume—such as technology, clothing, or food ingredients—the costs of these items will increase. &nbsp,

For example, if agrarian tools, fertilizers, and presentation materials are subject to tariffs, the cost of producing meals will ultimately increase. &nbsp,

When faced with higher input costs, American farmers are likely to pass those costs on to distributors and grocers, which will increase the cost of food.

Ironically, this will have the opposite effect as Trump claims: tariffs can be expected to increase food inflation, which is a particularly contentious political issue on the campaign trail.

Moreover, tariffs on a wide range of imports, especially from China, will affect countless industries—from technology and automotive to construction and consumer goods.

American companies, many of which rely on imported parts, will face increased costs, making US goods more expensive domestically and less competitive internationally.

This could cause businesses to increase prices, reduce investment, and even slash jobs. American consumers will ultimately bear the brunt of Trump’s proposed tariffs’ higher costs.

More broadly, Trump’s tariff plan risks destabilizing global trade networks. If tariffs cause higher prices and slower economic growth in the US, consumers will spend less, businesses will invest less, and overall economic activity will decline.

Additionally, the retaliatory tariffs that will likely come from nations affected by Trump’s tariffs could further stifle global growth and set the stage for a devastating, far-reaching trade war.

On a diplomatic level, Trump’s tariffs would exacerbate tensions with key allies and trading partners. &nbsp, Countries affected by the tariffs, not just China but also allies like Canada, Mexico, Japan and EU nations, are likely to respond by imposing their own new duties on American goods. &nbsp,

This would hurt US exporters, particularly in industries like agriculture, manufacturing and technology. &nbsp,

No country actually wins by distorting free trade, as trade wars are a zero-sum game. Instead, history demonstrates that they cause persistent economic suffering and diplomatic strife.

A breakdown in US trade relations with its key trading partners could also threaten America’s reputation abroad. Countries targeted by US tariffs may turn toward other global powers, not least China, to form new alliances, weakening America’s global influence and power.

A US-led switch to high-wall protectionism in favor of multilateral trade agreements would ultimately lead to a more disorganized and less prosperous global economy and not have the opposite effect on China that Trump’s tariffs are meant to impose.

Continue Reading

China lacks will and way to lead the world – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The” China Dream”, President Xi Jinping’s perspective to restore China’s great power status, was the main topic of Xi’s 75th National Day statement.

Many&nbsp, important individuals&nbsp, and&nbsp, policymakers&nbsp, in Washington agree as a matter of fact that the one of the China Dream’s aims is to remove the US-led global order and so Washington’s international leadership and power.

As exemplified by the lack of problem for international politics in Xi’s subsequent remarks, they’re wrong. Beijing is willing and—more importantly—unable to change America on the international level. To prioritize British interests, US policy must adjust to this fact.

Xi ‘s&nbsp, 2017 talk to the 19th National Party Congress&nbsp, is&nbsp, often&nbsp, cited&nbsp, as proof of Beijing’s intention to reject America’s role in the world. In that speech, Xi envisions China as” a global leader” having “mov]ed ] closer to the center stage”.

If Washington is to get Xi at his term, as&nbsp, some are wont&nbsp, to recommend, therefore China simply seeks a greater say in the world buy commensurate with its rise in power – no world domination.

When assessing Xi’s remarks at the 20th National Party Congress in 2022, he had even less to say about global leadership – only that China should aim to have the&nbsp, most” comprehensive national strength” and “international influence” &nbsp, by mid-century.

Although it is a stronger speech than it was in 2017, it is based on incredibly personal factors. The Chinese concept of” Comprehensive National Power,” which seeks to assess power through both qualitative and quantitative factors, is the foundation of comprehensive national power.

Various sources produce different output. With China ‘s&nbsp, low efficiency, &nbsp, making socioeconomic crisis and&nbsp, limited natural resources, it is difficult to see how Beijing claims the best energy place by 2050.

Equally, given the&nbsp, decline in China’s favorability&nbsp, in the United States, Europe and US-allied Asian countries and&nbsp, growth of” tough on China” policies, China has a long road ahead to reverse its influence fortunes.

Even if one were to read the worst into Xi’s and other Chinese Communist Party leaders ‘ speeches, Beijing’s three major foreign policy visions – the&nbsp, Global Development, &nbsp, Global Security, &nbsp, and Global Civilization Initiatives&nbsp, – do n’t call for an overthrow of” American leadership” or the international order.

At worst, they all point to a multipolar order in which China is the most admired great power in East Asia.

Outside of China’s words and ideas, the People’s Republic’s actions show that it is not willing or capable of displacing the United States ‘ global role.

While Beijing has established and expanded various international institutions, such as&nbsp, BRICS&nbsp, and the&nbsp, Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, these have been opened to new members who will likely dilute China’s influence.

By virtue of their more limited scopes, Chinese-created institutions cannot replace the UN system, which even Beijing&nbsp, acknowledges is the premier representative of international order.

Militarily, China cannot project power globally. It has only&nbsp, one formal military alliance&nbsp, with its neighbor North Korea compared to the United States’&nbsp, 51 treaty allies&nbsp, across the Americas, Europe and the Indo-Pacific, thereby limiting the scope of its military activities.

So far, China has n’t sought additional treaty alliances – including its “better than an alliance” with Russia, which has not seen Chinese troops join Russia’s in Ukraine.

Beijing also lacks the world’s largest base system, which is essential for power projection. While US intelligence asserts China is working to establish bases in eight other countries outside of existing arrangements in&nbsp, Djibouti&nbsp, and&nbsp, Cambodia, this would be a far cry from Washington ‘s&nbsp, over 750 military bases&nbsp, in 80 countries.

If successful, Beijing’s facilities would be limited to countries along its global trade routes.

China does seek global economic and cultural influence, but this is likely to fail, in contrast to the world’s military power. De-risking, reshoring, nearshoring and friendshoring are the&nbsp, commerce terms of the day&nbsp, with countries and companies seeking alternative sources to China.

Beijing is unlikely to buck these global trends as it seeks to&nbsp, produce more at home&nbsp, while its&nbsp, economic coercion fails abroad. Similarly, Chinese cultural exports have not taken off and improved views of China, a striking contrast with its neighbor&nbsp, South Korea.

Due to China’s more traditional culture, difficult language, and censorship concerns, American levels of global cultural status appear out of reach.

Finally, China probably feels that the cost of removing the United States as the only global leader is too high. Historically, overextension has led to the&nbsp, fall of states. From a contemporary standpoint, the&nbsp, multitrillion-dollar price tag&nbsp, of US-style global leadership is astronomical.

Beijing must acknowledge that East Asian and domestic resources could be better utilized.

Washington would make sense of Beijing’s understanding that it does not and cannot not attempt to replace America as a global superpower. Policymakers should prioritize the real American interests rather than wasting resources on preventing something that China does n’t want.

This means maintaining dominance of the Western Hemisphere, bolstering economic security, deterring threats to the homeland and adhering to Constitutional principles. Only then can the US’s position of power and security be increased.

&nbsp, Quinn Marschik is a Contributing Fellow at Defense Priorities.

Continue Reading

How Xi’s crackdown turned China’s finance high-flyers into ‘rats’

By:
On:
In: Asia
Getty Images Businessman against Chinese flag in double exposure.Getty Images

” Then I think about it, I certainly chose the wrong market”.

Xiao Chen*, who works in a private equity firm in China’s economic hub, Shanghai, says he is having a hard time.

For his first year in the job, he says he was paid almost 750, 000 yuan ($ 106, 200, £81, 200 ). He was certain he would quickly reach the million-yuan level.

He is now making half of what he did when he was younger. His earn was frozen next year, and an annual extra, which had been a major part of his earnings, vanished.

The “glow” of the business has worn off, he says. It had previously made him “feel fancy”. Today, he is just a “finance rat”, as he and his contemporaries are derisively called online.

China’s once-thriving sector, which encouraged ambition, is now slow. The government’s leader, Xi Jinping, has become afraid of personal success and the difficulties of widening injustice.

Reprisals on billionaires and firms, from real estate to technology to funding, have been accompanied by socialist-style communications on enduring pain and trying for China’s success. Even famous people have been instructed to post more photos electronically.

People are told that loyalty to the Communist Party and their country then outweighs personal ambition, which has altered Chinese community in the last few decades.

Mr. Chen’s luxurious lifestyle has undoubtedly experienced the pinch from this U-turn. He exchanged a cheaper vacation in South East Asia for a vacation in Europe. And he says he “would n’t even think about” buying again from luxury brands like” Burberry or Louis Vuitton”.

But at least ordinary workers like him are less likely to find themselves in trouble with the law. Dozens of finance officials and banking bosses have been detained, including the former chairman of the Bank of China.

The market is under strain. Give reductions in banks and investment companies are a hot topic on Chinese social media, despite the few companies that have formally acknowledged it.

Millions of views have been posted on content about falling incomes recently. Additionally, hashtags like” changing careers from fund” and “quitting financing” have received more than two million views on the well-known social media platform Xiaohongshu.

Some finance professionals have seen their money decline since the start of the epidemic, but some people view one popular social media post as a turning point.

In July 2022, a Xiaohongshu person sparked anger after boasting about her 29-year-old father’s 82, 500-yuan monthly spend at leading financial services business, China International Capital Corporation.

People were shocked by the significant wage gap between what a fund contractor was receiving and their own money. The average monthly salary in the country’s richest area, Shanghai, was just over 12, 000 renminbi.

It sparked a discussion about incomes in the field that had been started by another net users who made money earlier that year.

These posts were made shortly after Xi demanded” common wealth,” a plan to close the growing wealth gap.

China’s financing ministry issued new regulations in August 2022 that required businesses to “optimise the domestic income distribution and medically design the wage system.”

The following season, the country’s major problem watchdog criticised the ideas of “finance elites” and the “only cash matters” process, making funding a clearer target for the country’s continued anti-corruption campaign.

Getty Images Shanghai skyline.Getty Images

The changes came in a sweeping but discreet way, according to Alex*, a manager at a state-controlled bank in China’s capital, Beijing.

Even if there is an official document, you would not see the order put into writing; it’s certainly not for people on our level to see it. But everyone knows there is a cap on it ]salaries ] now. Simply put, we are unsure of the cap’s size.

According to Alex, employers are also having a hard time adjusting to the rapid pace of the crackdown:” Many banks ‘ orders could change unexpectedly quickly.”

By June or July, they would realize that the payment of salaries has exceeded the requirement, according to them. They would issue the annual guidance in February. Then they would develop methods to establish performance goals that would take people’s pay.”

Mr. Chen claims that his workload has decreased significantly as fewer companies have started trading shares on the stock market. Domestic businesses have also become cautious in China as a result of the crackdowns and weak consumption, and foreign investment has decreased.

In the past, his work frequently involved new initiatives that would generate revenue for his business. His days are currently primarily filled with chores, such as organizing the data from his earlier projects.

” The team’s morale is very low, and most discussions with the bosses are negative,” the team said. In three to five years, people are discussing what to do.

Although there have been some layoffs, it’s difficult to say whether people are leaving the industry in large numbers. Jobs are also scarce in China now, so even a lower-paying finance job is still worth keeping.

But the frustration is evident. Switching jobs and changing seats were compared by a user on Xiaohongshu, but he warned that if you stand up, your seat might be gone.

Mr. Chen claims that Chinese society in general is at odds with the authorities and that it’s also true that finance workers are at odds with the authorities.

” We are no longer wanted, even on a blind date.” Once they learned that you worked in finance, you would be advised not to leave.

The finance workers ‘ names have been changed to protect their identities.

Continue Reading