Abe’s diplomacy in Southeast Asia leaves a lasting legacy

Abe’s diplomacy in Southeast Asia leaves a lasting legacy

In eulogies and memorial commentaries that followed the death of previous Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, who had been assassinated by a homemade shotgun in the associated with Nara in Come july 1st, scholars and statesmen have stressed the importance of his Free plus Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) vision. Some have  even credited your pet with inventing the Indo-Pacific region in general. Yet few have got properly addressed Abe’s legacy in Southeast Asia.  

Abe, like many prime ministers before him, had always shown an enthusiastic interest in the region. Japan understood the significance associated with Southeast Asia in order to Japan’s post-war economic growth, as well as the political ties that would be essential to the maintenance of Japan security. Sea lanes of communication, especially in the South Tiongkok Sea, are essential as the majority of power imports travel through the region. China’s historic rise reinforced Japan’s bilateral relations with many ASEAN countries, along with Abe’s not-so-secret purpose of moving Japan towards becoming a normal power, as in getting capable of both defending itself and increasing its own military capacity.  

Abe remained pragmatic and opportunistic about some of the more prescient events in the region. When then-royal Thai Military chief Prayut Chan-o-cha overthrew the democratically elected government of Yingluck Shinawatra, Japan’s response was just that it was “regrettable” plus urged the come back of democracy. Abe’s steady diplomacy along with Thailand was apparent in participation within Cobra Gold workouts with the U. Ersus. military, as well as ensuring that Prayut continued to back up freedom of navigation and the resolution associated with disputes by tranquil means, as recognized in the 1982 EL Convention on the Legislation of the Sea. Japan’s pragmatic diplomacy contributed to greater unity among Southeast Asian states with regard to China’s conduct in the Southern China Sea.  

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi (left) stands with Indonesia’s Chief executive Joko Widodo (centre) and Japan’s Best Minister Shinzo Abe during the 14th East Asia Summit within Bangkok on four November, 2019, within the sidelines of the 35th ASEAN Summit. Photo: Manan Vatsyayana/AFP


Abe’s diplomacy was difficult and balanced with the Thailänder junta, pushing  for the return to democracy, whilst also careful never to nudge a notoriously sensitive Thai international policy in the direction of Beijing’s. He understood the particular utility of tolerating Prayut, while promoting Japan’s business plus strategic interests in the land.

Japan has long realized that Thailand offers desired defense modernisation, evidenced by a rise in defense spending as a percentage associated with GDP or roughly $102 billion and a comical attempt to purchase a submarine through China. Under Abe, Thailand and The japanese have advanced defense talks, with latest discussions about giving Thailand with an air flow defense system.  

Abe’s policy in Cambodia was similar to his policy in Thailand. Because the thin veneer associated with democracy in Cambodia gave way to a intense crackdown the Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP), the Kingdom’s primary opposition party, Abe remained pragmatic. Inside a 40 country joint declaration in the United Human Legal rights Council condemning politics repression in Cambodia, Abe remained silent, staking out a posture between Cambodian Best Minister Hun Sen’s domestic political plan and Phnom Penh’s biggest supporter, Beijing.  

Our Japan friends have never discontinued us. ”

former Cambodian National Election Committee (NEC) Chairman Sik Bun Hok

Japan found diplomatic achievement prior to Abe, yet he was able to power Japan’s credibility directly into favorable relations along with Hun Sen. This particular meant bucking the particular international trend associated with imposing sanctions on Cambodia, including revoking access to broader marketplaces under the European Union’s Everything But Hands scheme. Abe actually doubled down on electoral support to Cambodia, even though he  understood elections in the country will be a scam, donating 10, 000 ballot containers ahead of the much-maligned July 2018 National Polls. While the boxes, really worth $7. 5 mil were among several contributions to Cambodia, symbolised something crucial to Cambodia, friendship, proved by the words of former Cambodian National Election Committee (NEC) Chairman Sik Bun Hok who said, “Our Japanese friends have never abandoned us. ” In kampfstark contrast to developing autocracy in his country, Hun Sen once known Japan as a “model of democracy…and the only suitable country that we can learn from. ”   


Pragmatism is a hallmark of Abe’s legacy in Southeast Asia. In a region centered by autocrats, Japan’s diplomacy under Abe sought to deliver at the political capital and soft power that will Japan had accumulated over the past several years, determined to become a dependable funding and infrastructure partner in the region, the counter to expensive Chinese Belt plus Road Initiative tasks. Proof rests within expanded partnerships, like Hun Sen’s ask for of $800 mil to develop a skytrain for Phnom Penh.  

Abe understood that in order to manage China’s not-so-peaceful rise, it might have to maintain romantic relationships with regimes that ran contrary to Japan’s professed values—even within Myanmar, whose geography connects China towards the critical Bay associated with Bengal. As an energy importer, Japan depends on secure passage through the waters near both Cambodia and Myanmar. Relationships with both are critical to Japan’s national security.

After their death, Abe’s – and Japan’s – legacy in Southeast Asia continues under Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. He has been on hand in Bangkok in May to indication an agreement that moved vital defense devices and technology through Japan to Thailand in order to further Prayut’s defense modernisation effort. Kishida was able to expand Bangkok’s perspective plus managed to secure Prayut’s support for the maintenance of this self-destruction , not only with regards to territorial integrity and sovereignty for Ukraine, but in the Indo-Pacific backyard.   Within Thailand, Japan’s carried on investments in farming, 5G technology, electrical vehicles and facilities widen an already burgeoning economic partnership.

Whilst Abe had walked down prior to the Feb 2021 coup d’état that wrested Aung San Suu Kyi from energy in Myanmar, Kishida has managed to silently maintain relationships along with military power brokers and policymakers. Circumstances have undoubtedly transformed in Myanmar, along with Abe’s ambitions of a private sector-led initiative to compete with China in the country, but assist in its democratization.  

In 2020, Japan supplied Myanmar with more than $400 million in low-interest loans to finance road infrastructure plus financing for small-to-medium sized companies. However, as the environment to get private sector advancement has degraded, Kishida has begun cautioning the particular private sector about doing business in the country that will weakens Japan’s position as a promoter associated with human rights. In a departure from Abe’s pragmatism, Kishida provides moved further toward being a human rights norm enforcer in the Indo-Pacific, meeting frequently with other ASEAN member states to discuss the particular regional crisis plus strongly condemn the Myanmar junta’s human rights abuses.

While Abe may not have been the originator of proactive and pragmatic diplomacy in Southeast Asian countries, he clearly taken care of and greatly enhanced Japan’s relationships along with key actors in the region, in particular with Thailand, Cambodia and Myanmar in particular.   Kishida, while inheriting a political landscape much more fraught with challenges, has not yet shown that he will change Japan’s course in the near future.