Your shift, President Xi. This may be the important information from Donald Trump’s amazing reversal on large “day one ” tariffs on China.
The reprieve Trump appears to have granted Asia’s biggest economy is one Xi Jinping’s Communist Party certainly did n’t see coming. For weeks now, Trump and the gang of anti-China advisers he’s named to his new administration promised immediate 60 % tariffs as the centerpiece of a “shock-and-awe ” trade war.
No so quickly, it turns out. Taxes on Chinese goods are somewhat excluded from the storm of first-week executive orders. When pressed, Trump actually lowered his places. Whereas Canada and Mexico face 25 % levies by February 1, China might suffer a mere 10 %.
Chances are, this is Trump’s means of cajoling Xi to the dealing stand for a large Group of Two business deal. To be sure, slow-walking China levies are aimed primarily at the share market.
Though Trump was n’t worry less about laws, standards or political politeness, he cares a great deal about Wall Street. Stories about stocks tumbling this year are the last thing the new US senator wants.
But Trump is also spoiling for an incredible clash with China, particularly once he realizes that Xi is n’t Shinzo Abe.
Beginning in December 2012, Japanese Prime Minister Abe pledged to revive an market hard being eclipsed by China. In the years that followed, Abe empowered the Bank of Japan to force its ultraloose guidelines into unknown territory and took steps to improve corporate governance.
Next came the Trump 1. 0 age, threatening trade war the likes of which Asia had never seen. Instantly, Abe snapped to focus to attempt to protect Asia’s No. 2 business from Trump’s taxes.
Following Trump’s impact vote win in November 2016, Abe made a run for New York. He was the first earth leader to visit Trump Tower to thank the man.
Abe did more than that, vouching for the “America First” leader in flowing words. “ I am convinced Mr. Trump is a leader in whom I may have great confidence ” and “a relationship of trust, ” Abe told investigators that day.
In the months and years that followed, Abe made a world splash wining and dining with Trump’s second White House group— including at Trump’s Florida sport team. On top of throwing praise, He gifted him premium golf equipment, including a US$ 3,755 motorist, among other extravagant gifts.
Abe was feted as a political Trump vehicle, credited for protecting Japan from the worst of the business conflict. One method Abe tamed Trump was acquiescing to a diplomatic trade deal in 2019. Abe’s genuine success was in running out the time on Trump 1. 0. By slow-walking on negotiations, Tokyo managed to achieve a “draw ” between the two nations.
At the end of the process, Japan effectively agreed to the same market-opening steps it had under the Barack Obama-led Trans-Pacific Partnership ( TPP ) pact that Trump scrapped.
Group Abe distracted Trump with greater market exposure for US meat, pork, and maize exporters. But the offer clearly did n’t include electrical products. Tokyo rejoiced.
“With typical hyperbole, President Trump declared the deal phenomenal, ” notes Matthew Goodman, who at the time led economic policy for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “ But once again, President Trump … settled for a simple package. ”
You Xi pull off a comparable rearranging-of-the-deckchairs US business deal? The question is whether Xi’s group may even care.
After all, some earth leaders had a worse 2024 than Xi. China ’s home issue, weak home need, near-record youth unemployment and aging people have produced negative forces for seven consecutive rooms now.
The second-biggest market also saw an alarming increase in in-person demonstrations. And China Inc. is also dealing with the fallout from Xi’s tech-sector onslaught.
Xi, in other words, has some issues for which to reply. It is questionable his group would be glad to see the most prominent Chinese leader since Mao Zedong appearing to lose ground to Trump — or appearing to bow to Washington on the world stage.
But Xi even definitely knows that after a period of quiet, Trump will almost certainly purchase up the taxes he’s threatened — and perhaps even bigger types than he’s telegraphed. Trump’s leading patron, Tesla businessman Elon Musk, last month talked about the needed for tariffs on Chinese energy cars.
“The Taiwanese car companies are the most economical car companies in the world, ” Musk told investors. “So, I think they will have major success outside of China depending on what kind of taxes or business restrictions are established. ” Musk has since walked backwards these remarks, but China has every reason to worry Trump might come after China ’s car market.
For today, Trump claims to have commissioned a broad overview of Washington ’s trade ties with China and other vital trading lovers. The White House, Team Trump says, will “investigate and treatment consistent trade deficits that damage our business and safety. ”
Such evaluations take occasion, of course. Times, in some cases. But Trump’s US Trade Representative company almost needs satellites to know that his 2018 cope with Xi was a failure. To Chad Bown at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the way in which the second Trump-Xi trade deal “fell little ” is the “anatomy of a dud. ”
As Bown sees it, “attempting to maintain trade — to join Trump’s goal of reducing the diplomatic trade imbalance— was self-defeating from the begin. It did not help that neither China nor the United States was eager to de-escalate their painful price war. ”
Nor does that seem the path now as Trump surrounds himself with China secularists. They include assistant Peter Navarro, who co-wrote a text titled “Death By China. ” And deal king Robert Lighthizer, who’s signaled that Trump 2. 0 is considering a currency devaluation ploy.
Yet US Treasury Secretary-nominee Scott Bessent, who’s considered less MAGA-ish than most Trump government takes, has taken to discussing China in dark conditions. During his subsequent confirmation reading, Bessent said China had “the most uneven business in the history of the world ” and that it might be suffering a “severe recession/depression. ”
Bessent even segued to MAGA talking factors about Beijing’s presumably flooding the world with cheap products to finance its military passions. Commenting on Trump’s earlier deal, Bessent argued that “China has not made good on their [agriculture ] purchases ” and that the US will push Beijing to resume those purchases and perhaps add a “make-up provision. ”
But all this speaks to the great odds that Trump’s industry war may reemerge sooner rather than later. “If there’s any training for US-China ties from Trump 1. 0, it is that he is a fluctuation system and predicting what he will do is a sucker’s game, ” says lifelong China watcher Bill Bishop, who writes the Sinocism email.
Bishop notes that investors “had found some comfort in the fact that President Trump did not impose more tariffs on [ China ] on his first day in office, but they forget his earlier promise to impose 10 % tariffs, in addition to any other tariffs that may come on, because of fentanyl. He reiterated the 10 % tax hazard Tuesday. ”
The wait does purchase Xi a huge opportunity. While Trump is distracted with local exploits – from avenging his critics to overseeing a large imprisonment system for illegal residents to devising tax cuts – Xi’s team may expand efforts to reduce its trade surplus the natural way by increasing regional demand as a means of boosting import activity.
On the one hand, China ’s nearly US$ 1 trillion trade surplus proves that efforts by Trump 1. 0 and the West in general to alter the mechanics of world trade came up short. China ’s global manufacturing dominance has only grown since 2017, a fact Trump 2. 0 can verify with a mere Google search. Yet Xi has the power to alter these global dynamics.
A vital first step would be to end the property crisis once and for all. The drip, drip, drip of bad news about housing demand and prices is deflating consumer prices and confidence simultaneously. Beijing’s slow response continues to inspire “Japanification ” chatter and have some on Wall Street debating if China is “uninvestable. ”
On Monday, Fitch Ratings downgraded homebuilder China Vanke Co. , a reminder that default risks continue to hover over the sector. The move “reflects a deterioration in China Vanke’s sales and cash generation, which is eroding its liquidity buffer against large capital market debt maturities in 2025,” says Fitch analyst Rebecca Tang.
Trouble is, Vanke’s challenges are hardly unique. The extreme downward pressure on the yuan, meantime , could increase default risks as offshore debt payments become harder to make. This tug of war is limiting the People’s Bank of China ’s latitude to cut interest rates.
Xi could take steps to accelerate China ’s pivot toward increased domestic demand-led growth, reducing Trump 2. 0’s argument that Beijing is n’t sharing its 5 % rate of annual output globally.
At the moment, “China’s economy is showing signs of revival, led by industrial output and exports, ” says Frederic Neumann, chief Asia economist at HSBC.
Yet a trade war would put these drivers in harm’s way. What’s needed are large and robust social safety nets to encourage households to spend more and save less. Xi and Premier Li Qiang talk often about doing so, but little has been achieved to transform China ’s consumption dynamics.
The drop in “spending on property by roughly half since the peak in 2021 represents a huge drop in domestic demand, which cannot be easily replaced by more spending on consumer goods or government investment, ” says economist Duncan Wrigley at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
Only top-down policy shifts in Beijing could jumpstart household demand and halt the deflationary pressures making headlines. At the same time, international funds are still waiting on moves to strengthen capital markets, improve corporate transparency, reduce the dominance of state-owned enterprises and make more space for startups to disrupt the economy.
This will require considerable political will in Beijing – and patience on the part of investors. Though markets crave major retooling, they don’t often afford Team Xi the space and time needed to execute them.
Moves to repair, change or tweak China ’s engines are certain to depress growth somewhat. Markets, though, tend to react badly when upgrades soften growth.
This paradox has carried over into 2025. The slow pace of reform in recent years is catching up with Xi’s government, and markets are reacting badly. Mainland stocks began 2025 with their weakest start since 2016. That has Beijing rolling out measures to stabilize equities.
Among them is boosting how much pensions can invest in listed Chinese companies as investors brace for the second Trump administration. It’s part of a Beijing directive is to “steady the stock market, and clear bottlenecks for the introduction of mid-to-long-term capital, ” according to the China Securities Regulatory Commission.
Yet nothing might steady Chinese markets faster than knowing how or when Trump might tax Beijing– and by how much. Until traders get an answer, 2025 is sure to make market volatility great again.
Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek