US friend-shoring hurts China’s industrial profits

Chinese industrial firms made lower profits in the first quarter than a year ago as the United States’ “near-shoring” and “friend-shoring” strategy has started showing a negative impact on the Chinese manufacturing sector.

China’s industrial firms’ profits fell 21.4% year-on-year to 1.52 trillion yuan ($220 billion) in the first three months from 1.93 trillion yuan a year ago, the National Bureau of Statistics said Thursday. The year-on-year decline was 22.9% in the first two months of this year.

Of the 413 billion yuan drop in industrial profits in the first quarter, the computers, telecommunication and other electronic equipment sector contributed 20%. The rest was attributable to the chemical, metal and oil refinery industries, which are more sensitive to changes in commodity prices.

Manufacturers of computers, telecommunication and other electronic equipment saw their revenue down 6.4% to 3.24 trillion yuan in the first quarter from a year earlier while their profits contracted 57.5% to 60.73 billion yuan.

Chinese officials concluded that the shrinking profits were a result of weak external demand but some analysts suggested that the problem is more of a structural one.

Zhang Zhongjie, an economist at Huajin Securities, writes in a research report that the export of electronic products has regained its growth momentum in the first quarter of 2023 from the fourth quarter of last year after China ended its zero-Covid policy last December. He says, however, the recovery was slowed by the protectionist US policy. 

Zhang Yansheng, chief researcher at the China Center for International Economic Exchanges, has recently said on two occasions that the decline in China’s industrial profits was caused by not only a slowing external demand but also the restructuring of the US supply chains.  

“At present, the biggest challenge for China’s foreign trade is the decoupling of the Sino-US supply chain,” Zhang says. “In 2018, the US used trade disputes to push forward ‘re-shoring’ and ’near-shoring,’ and now it is promoting ‘friend-shoring’ to achieve its decoupling goal.”

He notes that the US has recently forced its companies to reduce their purchases in China while some traditional foreign customers have also encouraged Chinese manufacturers to relocate to some Southeast Asian and South Asian countries.

“Geopolitics can cause huge and far-reaching damage to the stability of the global supply chain, and this will have a major impact on China’s future foreign trade situation,” he says. “China is now selling more and more intermediate products to South and Southeast Asia, Eastern European and Mexico, which will do the processing and assembly and then ship the end products to the US and Europe.”

Zhang says China can boost industrial profits by strengthening its research and development to fight for high-value manufacturing orders, and also partnering with overseas scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs to sell professional services. 

Since the Sino-US trade war began in 2018, US officials have pushed forward a “re-shoring” and “near-shoring” strategy, encouraging companies to produce their goods in Mexico and the US.

In June last year, the Biden administration said it would waive tariffs on solar panels imported to the US from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam for 24 months. The move provided incentives for Chinese solar panel suppliers to move to these four countries.

Last November, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen visited India to promote the US “friend-shoring” drive, which will also benefit Vietnam and Indonesia.

Auto, metal and energy sectors

Meanwhile, other industries performed differently in terms of their profitability during the first quarter. 

Automakers recorded a 1.3% growth in revenue to 2.14 trillion yuan but their profits contracted 24.2% to 81.9 billion yuan due to a price war in the sector. In March, their profits climbed 9.1%, in sharp contrast to a decrease of 41.7% in the January-February period.

Many metal suppliers and oil refiners recorded shrinking profits as the selling prices of their products fell faster than their raw materials. The electricity and thermal supplying sector recorded a 49% growth in profit while the electrical machinery and equipment manufacturing sector saw a 27.1% profit growth.

“Overall, the profit drop of Chinese industrial firms remains significant while the scope of profit losses for some companies is large,” NBS statistician Sun Xiao said in a media briefing on Thursday. “Hopefully, the easing of raw material prices will help improve the profitability of Chinese firms.”

Sun added that China has seen some signs of recovery in March when industrial profits dropped only 19.2% year-on-year, compared with a slump of 22.9% in the first two months.

To accelerate the recovery of industrial profits, Sun urged efforts to expand market demand, perk up confidence and give enterprises reason to feel positive about the future.

On Wednesday, the General Office of the State Council issued a circular laying out measures to improve the scale and structure of foreign trade to ensure its stable and high-quality growth.

Governments at all levels should promote the full resumption of important domestic offline expos for better supply and purchase matchmaking, and facilitate cross-border business personnel exchanges, according to the circular.

Efforts will be made to enhance market development services to stabilize exports to developed economies and guide enterprises to further develop markets in developing countries, ASEAN and other regional markets.

The circular came after some Chinese manufacturers said they met fewer buyers from Europe and the US at the Canton Fair, the largest trade show in China, which is being held in Guangzhou between April 15 and May 5.

They said they saw more buyers from Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia and Russia but these customers may provide lower margins. 

Read: US sanctions turn away Canton Fair’s Western buyers

Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

Exploring the investible opportunity in life sciences & healthcare in the Asia Pacific region

It has been a tumultuous time for the life sciences and healthcare space in the Asia Pacific region over the last three years. A post-pandemic boom saw a rapid surge in private equity buyouts in the sector through 2020 and 2021, followed by a sharp correction through last year.

However, 2023 promises to be a year in which life sciences and healthcare regains its spot among the top priorities of investors, with several macroeconomic, demographic, and digital adoption trends buoying interest.

To gain deeper insights into what the future holds for this critical sector, FinanceAsia in partnership with DFIN created the Life Sciences & Healthcare Report 2023. Our report is based on a study of the most significant recent trends in the sector so far; as well as a glimpse into what the future holds via bespoke research involving key stakeholders.

We surveyed nearly 70 investors, legal and financial advisors who are actively engaged in the space, as well as professionals operating in life sciences and healthcare companies across the APAC region, to obtain informed insights on the opportunities and challenges that come with investments in the sector.

Here are some of the key takeaways:

  • The life sciences and healthcare sector is expected to bounce back in 2023: After a challenging 2022 in which factors like rising interest rates and a post pandemic rationalisation saw a decline in interest in the space, respondents across categories demonstrate optimism about the sector’s prospects.
  • An overwhelming 80% of investors expect to be involved in a transaction (funding, M&A, public listing): Over the next two years, a vast majority of investors surveyed believe they will engage with the life sciences and healthcare space. This is particularly significant since only 40% have engaged in transactions in the sectors over the last two years. Among investors who have not associated with the sector so far, 100% are ready to invest, given the right opportunity.
  • APAC will receive increased investor focus: The regions aging population, rising pressure on the public healthcare systems in some markets, as well as a sharp increase in health consumerism and digital innovations are among the major factors driving investor interest. While the life sciences and healthcare space has underperformed in the region compared to North America and Europe, innovative solutions in this space will be embraced by the region’s digital savvy middle class population which is growing in affluence.
  • Investors expect heightened M&A activity and more foreign investment: This is particularly true of mature markets. Most investors (56.3%) expect to see a growth in both volume and value of M&As over the next two years.

Read the report for a comprehensive overview of the life sciences and healthcare space including:

  1. The verticals most likely to attract investor interest and M&A.
  2. The impact of a recessive climate on investment.
  3. The biggest opportunities within the life sciences and healthcare according to investors, advisors, and professionals.
  4. The most critical challenges that the sector is dealing with.
  5. A forward-looking view on the scope and potential of life sciences and healthcare in the APAC region.

The report is essential reading for investors engaged in or thinking of engaging with the life sciences and healthcare, companies operating in the sector looking for growth opportunities, as well as advisors serving the space.
 

Download the full report now

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

New levels of smog in Laos threaten tourism, public health

Covered by a thick blanket of haze, the opposite Mekong riverbank was barely visible to the human eye. 

Over the Buddhist New Year weekend in Luang Prabang, Laos, hazardous air pollution blurred the Mekong’s sandy beaches and blotted out surrounding mountains. Red-eyed locals squinting from the haze hoped rain would cleanse the toxic air before Lao New Year festivities, but instead of water, only ash fell from the skies. 

The land surrounding the UNESCO World Heritage town was pockmarked with burn scars. Traditional agriculture techniques in Laos depend on seasonal burnings, which are often blamed for the air pollution.

“We spent a few days locked up in our hotel room because it was impossible to breathe outside. It was awful,” said Fenya Elzenhar, a German tourist. “We came here to enjoy nature, but we couldn’t even see the trees in front of us because of the haze.”

Smog in Southeast Asia is becoming a graver threat to nations across the region, with Laos and several Mekong neighbours attempting to take the first steps in tackling the issue.

Laos farmers, driven by a particularly hard period for their national economy, sparked an exceptionally long burning season this year in a bid to eke out more crops. But by late March and early April, the Air Quality Index (AQI) website IQ Air reported hazardous air pollution levels across Laos, sparking an outcry among residents and experts. The 500+ AQI soon became a major threat to public health and tourism, particularly the high levels of PM2.5 dust.

The orange haze that engulfed Luang Prabang forced locals to hide at home, tourists to cancel travel plans and business owners to find alternative sources of revenue. Concerns are growing about the long-term effects seasonal smog could have on Luang Prabang, the most popular tourist destination in Laos.

Hazy days in Luang Prabang

Benny Kong Chong Jee sipped his cold brew as flecks of ash layered the floor outside the restaurant cafe in Luang Prabang, where he has lived for the past 17 years. Until recently, his family lived with him. But that changed with the haze.

Air pollution around Luang Prabang reaches toxic levels following an exceptionally long burning season in Laos. Photos by Anton L. Delgado for Southeast Asia Globe

As the burning season began earlier than usual in February, Kong decided to move his family back to their home country.

“This issue caused me lots of sleepless nights,” he said. “It was a very hard choice, but we didn’t want the haze to have a negative impact on our children’s health.”

During the worst of the smog in March and April, Kong noted the profound impact the air pollution was having on the two hotels and tourism agencies he manages in town. 

Besides the loss of business from booking cancellations, the town’s tourism industry also missed income from the unknowable number of tourists who decided against visiting Laos in the first place because of the air pollution, Kong explained. Additionally, as the haze got worse, the tourists who had made it to Luang Prabang tended to stay in their hotel rooms, rather than explore the city and contribute to the local economy. 

Since burning began, Kong has decided to slow down his marketing strategy to prevent the customers from having a negative experience that might tarnish Laos’s reputation as a travel destination. Still, he empathised with the farmers whose burning had clouded the air.

“People are finding it harder to survive now, with high inflation and higher costs of living,” he said. “If they don’t burn the fields and start growing new crops today, they won’t have enough income to survive.”

Slash-and-burn agriculture is a common practice in many countries across Southeast Asia. This traditional method, which requires the burning of vegetation to create a nutrient-rich layer of soil, is often blamed for worsening air quality. Photos by Anton L. Delgado for Southeast Asia Globe.

Slash-and-burn agriculture, the traditional farming method of burning vegetation to create a nutrient-rich layer of soil, is typical in Laos. Air quality often declines in March as locals normally burn their fields to prepare for the new agricultural season. But what made the hazardous haze exceptional this year was that farmers began burning in early February and continued through late April.

The pandemic and the subsequent high inflation of Laos’ kip are likely compounding the pressures on farming communities within the country, which is regularly ranked to have the lowest GDP among ASEAN countries.

While acknowledging burning is vital for farmers, Phouthala Phouheuanghong, a 60-year-old farmer from XiengMen village across the Mekong River from Luang Prabang, believes the government should implement clear regulations to reduce the amount of forest being burned.

“Lots of people are already feeling unwell,” Phouthala said. “It wasn’t this bad before Covid, but now I worry that it will just get worse in the next few years.”

As the air thickened with pollution from the burning fields, residents found it increasingly hard to breathe. Those driving motorbikes to work in the haze, humidity and heat, often found themselves with red and teary eyes.

Laos isn’t the only country struggling to address air pollution concerns. Several Upper Mekong nations have suffered from equally severe burning seasons this year.

Smog engulfs Chiang Mai, which throughout March, ranked among the world’s most air polluted cities. In April, residents of northern Thailand filed a lawsuit against the Thai government demanding their ‘right to clean air.’ Photo by Anton L. Delgado for Southeast Asia Globe.

Air pollution across Northern Thailand, especially in cities such as Chiang Mai, reached such toxic levels this year that residents banded together to sue the Thai prime minister and other government bodies, demanding their “right to clean air.”

While health data in Laos is limited, just over the border in northern Thailand, the lung  cancer rate in 2022 was “the second most prevalent primary cancer behind liver and bile duct cancer,” as the region has been one of the most polluted globally, Bangkok Post reported. 

Neighbouring countries often point fingers when it comes to the issue of transboundary haze, but a new cooperative agreement between Myanmar, Thailand and Laos may take steps to address that. In early April, leaders from the three nations met to discuss transboundary air pollution and agreed to reduce slash-and-burn in border regions, as well as to tackle waste burning and provide modern methods for proper disposal.

A man burns a pile of trash in the outskirts of Luang Prabang as haze conceals the mountains in the backdrop. Photo by Anton L. Delgado for Southeast Asia Globe.

In Laos, smog has affected all 11 of the country’s districts, according to a Luang Prabang District official who requested not to be named for security reasons. 

“This year, the smog is much worse than in the past because people need to burn more fields for agricultural purposes,” the official said. “But we know this air is like poison for every life, including both animals and humans.” 


Additional reporting by a veteran Lao freelance journalist, who requested not to be named because of livelihood and safety concerns.

This story was produced in collaboration with The Mekong Eye and supported by Internews’ Earth Journalism Network.

Continue Reading

Ghosts of Vietnam haunt Biden in Ukraine

In 2009, shortly after his inauguration, Barack Obama undertook an intensive policy review to assess the desirability of a military “surge” in Afghanistan.

Then-vice president Joe Biden, who has just announced his intent to run again for president in 2024, was one of a handful of older advisers repeatedly reminding their new boss to remember the terrible consequences of an earlier generation’s escalation in Indochina.

Think very carefully, Biden said at one point, according to Bob Woodward’s recounting, or you’ll be “locked into Vietnam.”

Obama was not dissuaded and committed 30,000 new forces to Afghanistan. Vietnam was “not like this ghost in his head,” recalled Ben Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser — reflective of the generational divide between the two men noted by James Mann in his book “The Obamians.”

As president, Biden continues to respect the Vietnam “ghost” — and it hovers over his deliberations and decisions concerning Ukraine.

On one hand, Biden is emphatic about support for Ukraine and his passion for stymieing Vladimir Putin’s aggression. In Kiev in February 2023, the president assured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky of America’s “unwavering and unflagging commitment to Ukraine’s democracy, sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

These were anything but empty words, given the billions of dollars’ worth of aid and military equipment that the US has sent to Ukraine (US$27.5 billion to date), the sanctions imposed on Russia and the coalition of powerful allies that Washington has helped to organize that provided another $21 billion in aid.

On the other hand, Biden has kept sturdy guardrails around such words and actions.

Aid with restraint

Massive aid to Ukraine, yes — but restraint that keeps Americans themselves out of harm’s way on land, at sea and in the air.

Massive aid, yes — but arm’s-length enough to steer clear of a tripwire in the tense relationship with Moscow, especially as a frustrated Putin warns about tactical nuclear weapons.

Recent examples of US restraint include:

Lessons learned in Iraq and Afghanistan have obviously shaped the American balancing act in Ukraine, creating greater sensitivity to the problematic gap between desirable goals and prudent methods to achieve them.

Those 21st-century experiences highlighted for many the profound costs that can come with overconfident military commitments in distant and difficult terrains.

For someone Biden’s age, however, Vietnam offered a key initial lesson — one that caused him to try mentoring younger leaders in the Obama years, and one that provided weight and momentum to his controversial decision to end the US combat mission in Afghanistan in 2021.

US President Joe Biden awards the Medal of Honor to Major John J. Duffy, who fought in the Vietnam War, in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, July 5, 2022. Photo: EPA via The Conversation / Jim Lo Scalzo / Pool

The benefit of Biden’s age

Being an 80-year-old in 2023 means that the lived experience of the Vietnam War adds substantial heft to what others might see as mere ghosts.

Biden was first elected to the US Senate in 1972, surrounded by the storms of protest rising out of war in Southeast Asia. He knew full well how earlier arm’s-length engagement in Vietnam by former presidents evolved into direct embroilment:

The shadows of such Vietnam ghosts are evident in Biden’s carefully calibrated approach toward Ukraine — especially in his studied resistance to committing US forces to combat.

Avoiding Vietnam’s mistakes?

But the current war is not yet over.

Will the president be able to maintain the balance that has so far allowed him to avoid serious Vietnam-like errors? Will the mature judgment emerging from the 80-year-old’s lived experiences have further staying power?

Problematic past decisions should figure in speculation about what may come next in US support of Ukraine. All the presidents involved in Vietnam had intelligence at least equal to Biden’s.

Each was also capable of both shrewdness and restraint — witness Truman’s firing of wild-eyed General Douglas MacArthur during the Korean War and Kennedy’s handling of the Cuban missile crisis.

At the same time, determination and feistiness — hardly absent in Biden given his intention to remain in office until he’s 85 — led these presidents down the road to tragic failure in Vietnam.

Just look at Eisenhower’s notion of a viable South Vietnamese nation led by the autocratic Diem, or Johnson’s conviction that awe-inspiring US military power could squash a “damn little pissant country” like Vietnam.

American soldiers meet US President Lyndon Johnson in South Vietnam. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Kennedy was insightful enough to fear the implications of committing even a small number of forces to Vietnam: “It’s like taking a drink. The effect wears off and you have to take another.” He took the first drink anyway.

Johnson then guzzled — even though he wondered if he was acting like a catfish gobbling “a big juicy worm with a right sharp hook in the middle of it.

Protracted wars create profoundly complex challenges for all leaders. The absence of victory and/or the unpredictable behavior of enemies lead to military, political, economic and psychological stresses that can undercut pragmatism.

Biden is likely facing a difficult internal struggle that will continue if he’s elected for a second term in 2024. Will the ghosts of Vietnam be vanquished by a new generation of Ukraine-focused anxieties and phantoms?

Ronald W Pruessen is an emeritus professor of history at the University of Toronto.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Asia’s Best Managed Companies 2023 – Market winners

Every year, FinanceAsia publishes its highly regarded benchmark of Asia’s best companies.

Based on nomination by Asia’s active community of influential investors and financial analysts, the poll evaluates the corporate behaviour and performance of Asian peers over the past 12 months.

It is with this in mind that the FA team is delighted to announce the winners for 2023.

Following very positive market participation, we have decided to award up to three medals per category to reflect corporate achievements. Gold, silver and bronze medallists are detailed where applicable.

Read on for the winners of the following categories:

– Best Overall Company
– Best Large-cap
– Best Mid-cap
– Best Small-cap
– Best Corporate Esg Strategy
– Best DEI Strategy
– Best Investor Relations
– Best CEO
– Best CFO

Don’t forget to read about our Industry Winners here.

Thank you to all those who participated and congratulations!

—  WINNERS BY MARKET —

— Best Overall Company —

China
Gold – China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd.
Silver – Tencent Holdings Ltd.
Bronze – Xiaomi Inc.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
Silver – Link Real Estate Investment Trust
Bronze – Swire Pacific Ltd.

India
Gold – Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. & Tata Power Company Ltd.
Silver – Infosys Consultants Private Ltd.
Bronze – Hdfc Bank Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Pt Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk
Bronze – Pt Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc. / Megawide Construction Corporation
Silver – Bank Of The Philippine Islands
Bronze – Ayala Corporation

Singapore
Gold – Amtd Group Company Ltd.
Silver – Dbs Bank Ltd.

Taiwan
Gold – Chunghwa Telecom Company, Ltd.
Silver – Far Eastern New Century Corporation
Bronze – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd. & Wistron Neweb Corporation

Thailand
Gold – Ptt Global Chemical Public Company Ltd.
Silver – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.
Bronze – Central Retail Corporation Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Vingroup Joint Stock Company
Silver – Vinfast Joint Stock Company
Bronze – Vinhomes Joint Stock Company

— Best Large-cap —

China
Gold – China Mobile Ltd.
Silver – Wuxi Biologics Cayman Inc.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Pt Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk
Bronze – Pt Bank Central Asia Tbk

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd.
Silver – Chunghwa Telecom Company, Ltd.

— Best Mid-cap —

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Asiainfo Technologies Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Pt Perusahaan Minyak Nasional
Bronze – Pt Mayora Indah Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Bloomberry Resorts Corporation
Silver – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc.
Bronze – Gt Capital Holdings, Inc.

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

— Best Small-cap —

China
Gold – Yiren Digital Ltd.
Silver – Tarena International Inc.
Bronze – Hello Group Inc.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Sa Sa International Holdings
Silver – Far East Consortium International Ltd.
Bronze – Viva China Holdings Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt Bank Keb Hana Indonesia
Silver – Pt Perikanan Nusantara (Persero)
Bronze – Pt Adi Sarana Armada Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Manila Water Company, Inc.
Silver – Security Bank Corporation
Bronze – Megawide Construction Corporation

Singapore
Gold – Amtd Digital Inc.

Taiwan
Gold – Wistron Neweb Corporation
Silver – Hwahsia Glass Co., Ltd.

Thailand
Gold – Dohome Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Forth Corporation Public Company Ltd.
Bronze – Gunkul Engineering Public Company Ltd.

— Best Corporate Esg Strategy —

China
Gold – China Telecom Corporation, Ltd.
Silver – Wuxi Biologics Cayman Inc.
Bronze – Meituan Inc.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
Silver – Sino Land Company Ltd.
Bronze – The Mass Transit Railway Corporation

India
Gold – Infosys Consultants Private Ltd.
Silver – Tata Power Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Pt Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk
Bronze – Pt Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Ayala Corporation
Silver – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc.
Bronze – Sm Investments Corporation

Singapore
Gold – Sp Group Pte. Ltd.

Taiwan
Gold – Chunghwa Telecom Company, Ltd.
Silver – Wistron Neweb Corporation
Bronze – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

Thailand
Gold – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Ptt Global Chemical Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Vinfast Joint Stock Company
Silver – Vingroup Joint Stock Company
Bronze – Vinhomes Joint Stock Company

— Best DEI Strategy —

China
Gold – China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd.
Silver – Baidu, Inc.
Bronze – Trip.Com Group Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Far East Consortium International Ltd.
Silver – Asiainfo Technologies Ltd.

India
Gold – Tata Power Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Pt Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk
Bronze – Pt Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc.

Taiwan
Gold – Wistron Neweb Corporation
Silver – Far Eastern New Century Corporation
Bronze – Chunghwa Telecom Company, Ltd.

Thailand
Gold – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Vinfast Joint Stock Company

— Best Investor Relations —

China
Gold – China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd.
Silver – Asiainfo Technologies Ltd.
Bronze – Wuxi Biologics Cayman Inc.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Far East Consortium International Ltd.
Silver – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
Bronze – Asiainfo Technologies Ltd.

India
Gold – Tata Power Company Ltd.
Silver – Tata Motors Ltd.
Bronze – Titan Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Pt Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk
Bronze – Pt Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc.
Silver – Bdo Unibank, Inc.
Bronze – International Container Terminal Services, Inc.

Taiwan
Gold – Wistron Neweb Corporation
Silver – Far Eastern New Century Corporation
Bronze – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd. & Chunghwa Telecom Company, Ltd.

Thailand
Gold – Central Retail Corporation Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Dohome Public Company Ltd.
Bronze – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Vingroup Joint Stock Company
Silver – Vinhomes Joint Stock Company
Bronze – Vinfast Joint Stock Company

— Best CEO —

China
Gold – Liu Qiangdong – Jd.Com, Inc
Silver – Pony Ma Huateng – Tencent Holdings Ltd.
Bronze – Ke Ruiwen – China Telecom Corporation, Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Adrian Cheng – New World Development Company Ltd.
Silver – David Chiu – Far East Consortium International Ltd.
Bronze – Raymond Kwok – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.

India
Gold – Rajesh Gopinathan – Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.
Silver – Sandeep Bakhshi – Icici Bank Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Sunarso – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Royke Tumilaar – Pt Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk
Bronze – Jahja Setiaatmadja – Pt Bank Central Asia Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Jeffrey C Lim – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc. & Tg Limcaoco – Bank Of The Philippine Islands
Silver – Edgar Saavedra – Megawide Construction Corporation
Bronze – Enrique K Razon – International Container Terminal Services, Inc. /Bloomberry Resorts Corporation

Singapore
Gold – Piyush Gupta – Dbs Bank Ltd.

Taiwan
Gold – Chee Ching – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd.
Silver – Douglas Tong Hsu – Far Eastern New Century Corporation
Bronze – Jeffrey Gau – Wistron Neweb Corporation

Thailand
Gold – Preeyanart Sunthornwatha – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Phawat Witoopakorn – Eastern Polymer Group Public Company Ltd.
Bronze – Gunkul Dumrongpiyawut – Gunkul Engineering Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Le Thi Thu Thuy – Vinfast Joint Stock Company

— Best CFO —

China
Gold – Li Yuchao – China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd.
Silver – Li Yinghui – China Telecom Corporation, Ltd.
Bronze – Li Ronghua – China Mobile Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Vanessa Lau – Hong Kong Exchanges And Clearing Ltd.
Silver – Brian Sum – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
Bronze – Edward Lau – New World Development Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – Viviana Dyah Ayu Retno K – Pt. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – Sigit Prastowo – Pt Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk
Bronze – Novita Widya Anggraini – Pt Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk

Philippines
Gold – John Nai Peng Ong – Sm Prime Holdings, Inc.
Silver – Estela Tuason-Occena – Bloomberry Resorts Corporation
Bronze – Riza Maniego – Globe Telecom, Inc.

Singapore
Gold – Chng Sok Hui – Dbs Bank Ltd.

Taiwan
Gold – David Wang – Far Eastern New Century Corporation
Silver – Jona Song – Wistron Neweb Corporation

Thailand
Gold – Siriwong Borvornboonrutai – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – David Mansfield – Vinfast Joint Stock Company

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Asia’s Best Managed Companies 2023 – Industry winners

Every year, FinanceAsia publishes its highly regarded benchmark of Asia’s best companies.

Based on nomination by Asia’s active community of influential investors and financial analysts, the poll evaluates the corporate behaviour and performance of Asian peers over the past 12 months.

It is with this in mind that the FA team is delighted to announce the winners for 2023.

Following very positive market participation, we have decided to award up to three medals per category to reflect corporate achievements. Gold, silver and bronze medallists are detailed where applicable.

Read on for the winners of the following categories:

– Best Basic Materials Company
– Best Consumer Cyclicals Company
– Best Consumer Non-Cyclicals Company
– Best Energy Company
– Best Financial Company
– Best Healthcare Company
– Best Industrials Company
– Best Real Estate Company
– Best Technology Company
– Best Telecommunications Company
– Best Utilities Company

Don’t forget to read about our Market Winners here.

Thank you to all those who participated and congratulations!

— WINNERS BY SECTOR —

— Basic Materials Company —

Indonesia
Gold – PT Aneka Tambang Tbk
Silver – PT Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk & PT Petrokimia Gresik

Philippines
Gold – Nickel Asia Corporation

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

— Consumer Cyclicals Company —

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – ANTA Sports Products Ltd.
Silver – Viva China Holdings Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Mitra Adiperkasa Tbk
Silver – PT Erajaya Swasembada Tbk
Bronze -mPT Media Nusantara Citra Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Megawide Construction Corporation

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

— Consumer Non-Cyclicals Company —

China
Gold – Chongqing Hongjiu Fruit Company, Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Hengan International Group Company, Ltd.
Silver – Chongqing Hongjiu Fruit Company, Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
Silver – PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk
Bronze – PT Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd.

— Best Energy Company —

China
Gold – China Shenhua Energy Company Ltd.
Silver – CNOOC Ltd
Bronze – China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation

Indonesia
Gold – PT Perusahaan Minyak Nasional
Silver – PT Adaro Energy Indonesia Tbk
Bronze – PT AKR Corporindo Tbk & PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero)

Philippines
Gold – Aboitiz Power Corporation
Silver – ACEN Corporation & Semirara Mining And Power Corporation

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

Thailand
Gold – B. Grimm Power Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Energy Absolute Public Company Ltd. & Gunkul Engineering Public Company Ltd.

— Best Financial Company —

China
Gold – Industrial and Commercial Bank Of China (Asia) Ltd.
Silver – China Life Insurance Company Ltd.
Bronze – American International Assurance Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk & PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk
Bronze – PT Bank Central Asia Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Bank Of The Philippine Islands
Silver – BDO Unibank, Inc. & Metropolitan Bank & Trust Company

Taiwan
Gold – Cathay Financial Holding Company, Ltd.
Silver – Chailease Holding Company Ltd. & First Financial Holding Company Ltd.

— Best Healthcare Company —

China
Gold – Wuxi Biologics Cayman Inc. & Innovent Biologics, Inc.
Silver – Akeso, Inc.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
Silver – Canbridge Pharmaceuticals Inc.

India
Gold – Apollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd

Indonesia
Gold – PT Prodia Widyahusada Tbk
Silver – PT Kalbe Farma Tbk
Bronze – PT Medikaloka Hermina Tbk

Thailand
Gold – Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Intermedical Care and Lab Hospital Public Company Ltd.
Bronze – Praram 9 Hospital Public Company Ltd.

— Best Industrials Company —

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – TK Group Holdings Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Astra International Tbk
Silver – PT United Tractors Tbk
Bronze – PT Krakatau Steel (Persero) Tbk

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

— Best Real Estate Company —

China
Gold – China Resources Land Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Far East Consortium International Ltd.
Silver – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
Bronze – Swire Properties Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Ciputra Development Tbk
Silver – PT Bumi Serpong Damai Tbk
Bronze – PT Pakuwon Jati Tbk

Philippines
Gold – SM Prime Holdings, Inc.
Silver – Ayala Land, Inc. & Robinsons Land Corporation

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

Thailand
Gold – Origin Property Public Company Ltd.
Silver – Quality Houses Public Company Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Vinhomes Joint Stock Company

— Best Technology Company —

China
Gold – Tencent Holdings Ltd.
Silver – JD.Com, Inc.
Bronze – Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Asiainfo Technologies Ltd.
Silver – BYD Electronic Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – PT DCI Indonesia Tbk
Bronze – PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk

Taiwan
Gold – Wistron Neweb Corporation
Silver – Sercomm Corporation
Bronze – Topco Scientific Co. Ltd.

Vietnam
Gold – Vinfast Joint Stock Company

— Best Telecommunications Company —

China
Gold – China Mobile Ltd.
Silver – China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd.
Bronze – China Telecom Corporation, Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong)
Silver – China Tower Corporation Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk
Silver – PT XL Axiata Tbk
Bronze – PT Sarana Menara Nusantara Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Globe Telecom, Inc.
Silver – Converge ICT Solutions Inc.

Taiwan
Gold – Chunghwa Telecom Company, Ltd.
Silver – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd.
Bronze – Taiwan Mobile Corporation Ltd.

— Best Utilities Company —

China
Gold – China Power International Development Ltd.
Silver – China Datang Corporation Ltd.

Hong Kong SAR
Gold – Tian Lun Gas Holdings Ltd.

India
Gold – Tata Power Company Ltd.

Indonesia
Gold – PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk
Silver – PT Indonesia Kendaraaan Terminal Tbk
Bronze – PT Kencana Energi Lestari Tbk

Philippines
Gold – Manila Water Company, Inc.

Taiwan
Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation
 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Good vibrations: Thai party makes sex toy election pledge

BANGKOK: A conservative Thai political party is seeking to woo voters ahead of next month’s general election with a pledge to legalise sex toys, pointing to the fiscal – and frisky – benefits. Despite its reputation for being one of Southeast Asia’s most sexually liberated countries, Buddhist-majority Thailand remains conservativeContinue Reading

China’s exports shifting from West to Global South

NEW YORK – Central Asian countries increased imports from China in March by 55% over the year-earlier month, beating the 35% jump in Chinese shipments to Southeast Asia reported previously.

Former Soviet republics as well as Turkey and Iran all contributed to a near-record gain in Chinese exports to the region, a focus of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative.

China’s exports to the region have nearly tripled since 2018. The chart below includes Turkey and Iran in the Central Asian total.

Several factors contributed to the export boom, which included every country in the region.

China is investing heavily in energy, mineral resources and rail transport across the Asian continent, including a new rail line between China, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan scheduled to start construction next year.

The rail project, which will link China to European markets, has been planned since 1997 but only won approval in 2022, after Russia backed the venture. Russia’s need for Chinese support in the Ukraine war outweighed longstanding strategic rivalries between the two powers.

“The CKU railway is crucial to China for two interconnected purposes—to advance its geopolitical interests and to secure favorable relations with Central Asian elites for their support over Chinese legitimacy in Xinjiang (East Turkestan),” Niva Yau Tsz Yan wrote in a March 2023 commentary for the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

“Russia’s war in Ukraine has made new trade routes bypassing Russia more profitable, and a new Uzbek government is looking to expand regional and international engagement,” Yan wrote.

Iran’s imports from China had fallen to just US$800 million a month during 2019-2022 from a 2014 peak of $2.8 billion a month. But seasonally-adjusted Chinese shipments to Iran more than doubled to $1.7 billion in March.

Chronically short of cash, Iran depends on trade credits from China, by far its largest trading partner. The March increase evidently reflected more Chinese financing, and came after Iran accepted Chinese mediation in restoring diplomatic relations with its regional arch-rival Saudi Arabia. A reasonable inference is that Iran was being rewarded for good behavior.

China’s exports to Russia continued to rise sharply, along with exports to Turkey, which acts as an intermediary for Chinese trade with Russia. China has avoided direct violation of American sanctions on Russia, but Turkey and former Soviet republics have resold sanctioned goods to Moscow. The sharp increase in China’s exports to Kazakhstan probably reflects this intermediation.

Reuters reported on March 27 that Kazakhstan “would require exporters to file additional documents when sending goods to Russia, following reports that Russian companies have been using local intermediaries to bust Western sanctions… After the West barred sales of thousands of goods to Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine, some Kazakh businesses started purchasing such items and reselling them to Russian firms.”

China’s export prowess isn’t entirely free of tensions, though. In March, Turkey imposed a 40% tariff on imports of Chinese electric vehicles (EV’s), hoping to protect a local manufacturer. The Turkish automaker Togg plans to release its first EV later this year with a sticker price of $50,000.

A comparable Chinese model, for example, BYD’s Song sedan, sells for $27,500 in China—which means that BYD would still undercut Togg’s price despite the 40% surcharge. Meanwhile, BYD has just released its $11,300 Seagull subcompact, which has no competitor in the price range anywhere in the world.

In the kaleidoscope of Central Asian politics, a myriad of local factors explains the jump in China’s influence in the region. But all of them line up like iron filings before a magnet. China’s capacity to provide physical and digital infrastructure as well as affordable consumer goods, and its capacity to finance trade and investment out of its current account surplus, explain its economic power and political influence in the region.

There’s another geopolitical consequence of China’s export prowess in Central and Southeast Asia: China’s exports to the Global South and BRICS countries in March reached a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of $1.6 trillion a year.

That’s nearly four times China’s exports to the United States and more than the combined total of China’s exports to the US, Europe and Japan, which reached a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of $1.38 trillion in March.

That represents a geopolitical point of no return of sorts, the moment when China’s economic dependence on the United States in particular and developed markets in general slipped behind its economic standing in the developing world.

Follow David P Goldman on Twitter at @davidpgoldman

Continue Reading

It’s a lean green machine

Parties are vying for support from voters in the general election last month on a number of issues, including natural methods and the environment. Nearly all parties have made proposals for environmental protection and fostering a green and clean development.Continue Reading