Deutsche Bank appoints private banking market head for Singapore | FinanceAsia

Puneesh Nayar, managing director, is joining Deutsche Bank (DB) as market head in Singapore in its private bank, effective August 12. The branch sits within DB’s global South Asia. private bank division.

The Global South Asia business serves non-resident Indian (NRI) clients, and other clients from the sub-continent, from Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai, Geneva and London.

Nayar (pictured) has over 20 years of industry experience, most recently at Julius Baer where he was a senior team head for global India since 2016. Prior to that, he was the head of non-resident Indians Southeast Asia (SEA) and Middle East at BSI Bank, also in Singapore. Nayar also previously held roles at Coutts Bank and HSBC.

In another move in the same private banking division, in March, Nick Malik rejoined DB as market head, ased in Dubai. Malik returned to DB  this year from Credit Suisse. He was previously group head with DB for six years until 2022, and before that with Standard Chartered Private Bank in Singapore and Dubai. Prior to that, he was a senior advisor at Coutts’ in Singapore and the United Kingdom.

Both Nayar and Malik will report to Rajesh Mahadevan, DB’s head of Global South Asia & Africa, private bank emerging markets.

Mahadevan commented in a media release: “Our Global South Asia & Africa business is a market leader in this segment and a strong business pillar within our emerging markets franchise. DB’s global connectivity, balance sheet strength, combined with our corporate bank and investment bank offering gives our clients access to bespoke lending, banking and capital market solutions.”

Mahadevan added: “Puneesh and Nick’s breadth of experience and deep understanding of this client segment will further cement our market position as we broaden client coverage across core markets in Asia and the Middle East.”

For more FinanceAsia people moves click here


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Ampverse Group appoints global executives to advisory board

  • A newly appointed advisory board will guide the business through its future growth stage.
  • Advisors bring experience in online innovation, proper investments &amp, market expansion

Ampverse Group appoints global executives to advisory board

Ampverse Group, a leading gaming and entertainment habitat, announced the appointment of a new board of advisors comprising international executives from the game, marketing, funding, systems, and media sectors. This strategic decision strengthens the group’s position as a powerful force in the sector and furthers its growth.

Under the direction of CEO Charlie Baillie, the company said in a statement that the newly appointed board of advisors did guide Ampverse Group into its second growth cycle.

They include:

    John Redgrave, San Francisco: As the former vice president at Discord, Redgrave played a key part in the company’s growth and success. Prior to that, he founded Lattice, which Apple eventually sold to Discord and Sentropy, which he later sold to. Redgrave joins Ampverse Group’s advisory table with great expertise and a thorough understanding of online platforms.

  • Marcus John, Singapore: For over three decades, John has advised Fortune 500 companies, institutions, governments, and traders on big sporting and leisure opportunities, including the Olympic Games, FIFA World Cup, and Formula One. Prior to joining WPP’s MediaCom, John was the controlling chairman of IMG/Endeavor China and the Director of Sports Capital Advisors.
  • Rohit Sharma, Mumbai: Former COO and board member of AnyMind Group, Rohit even Founded POKKT, a leading wireless video marketing platform in India, SEA and MENA that has been backed by leading Buyers such as JAFCO Asia, Jungle Ventures, Singtel Innov8 and GSF.
  • Oliver Woodley, London: International professional director of Soho House Group and lengthy time investment into Ampverse, Woodley previously held senior jobs at VICE Media.
  • Chirag Shah, Mumbai: Chirag Shah is a skilled entrepreneur, having co-founded some advertising tech firms, including one effectively acquired by Dentsu. He brings a wealth of knowledge in Gaming 360, scaling firms, giving investment counsel, and navigating difficult areas.
  • Gita Ramakrishnan, London: Gita Ramakrishnan is a seasoned entrepreneur with over 20 years of experience in cash businesses, excelling in both personal and public stocks with a top ranking performance history.

The new board’s combined expertise and global reach will be a driving force behind Ampverse Group’s ambitious growth plans, according to the company. These advisors bring unparalleled experience in digital innovation, strategic investments, and market expansion. Their perspectives and leadership will help the organization advance its market share, promote its growth, and cultivate new frontiers.

Charlie Baillie, CEO of Ampverse Group, said:” To build a remarkable company, you need a remarkable team. Since founding Ampverse Group in 2019, we’ve been fortunate to attract a world-class group of team members and investors. Looking ahead, we have huge global ambitions, and therefore I’m excited and honored that such a distinguished group of leaders from the gaming, media, investment, technology, and advertising sectors share our vision and have agreed to join our newly formed advisory board”.

Founded in 2019 by former executives from Universal Music Group, Twitch, and Havas, Ampverse Group has rapidly expanded its influence, amassing over 600 million fans and forming 300 client partnerships. The company, which has its headquarters in Singapore and operations in Southeast Asia and India, is leveraging its expertise in gaming marketing and GenZ fan base monetization through tech-enabled commerce products and services to create an ecosystem of exciting gaming and entertainment assets.

Continue Reading

Vantage Data Centers breaks ground on 256MW Cyberjaya campus

  • Multi-facility school to help cloud and high-density processing
  • With KUL1, Vantage’s power in M’sia may reach 287MW upon full growth.

L-R: Kamarul Ariffin Abdul Samad, CEO Cyberview Sdn Bhd; Romli bin Ishak, chairman, Cyberview, Gobind Singh Deo, minister of Digital, Malaysia; Senator Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz, minister of Investment, Trade & Industry, Malaysia; Raymond Tong, APAC president, Vantage Data Centers; Sikh Shamsul Ibrahim Sikh Abdul Majid, CEO, Malaysian Investment Development Authority & Hasmarizal Bin Hassan, chief grid officer, Tenaga Nasional Berhad

Vantage Data Centers, a leading global provider of hyperscale data center campuses, has announced the groundbreaking of its second Cyberjaya campus ( KUL2 ) in Malaysia. Set on 35 acres of land adjacent to its existing campus ( KUL1 ), KUL2 will deliver 256MW of IT capacity at full build-out to support cloud adoption and the growth of artificial intelligence. Customers can expand quickly and easily at the school thanks to its own dedicated station.

” Vantage APAC marks a major step now,” said the CEO. Our KUL2 growth strengthens our market-leading place in Malaysia while contributing to the world’s electric economy”, said Raymond Tong, chairman of Vantage’s APAC company. We appreciate the assistance and support from various local partners and government departments in Malaysia, which has supported our ongoing progress.

Following last year’s announcement to invest an additional planned US$ 3 billion ( RM$ 3.3 billion ) into Malaysia, Vantage and Cyberview reached an agreement to purchase land to build what it claims is the city’s largest hyperscale data center campus. The multi-facility school, designed to support both fog and high-density processing deployments, will give customers the flexibility to target evolving market and professional needs. When both campuses are completely developed, Vantage does have 287MW of IT capability in Malaysia.

Senator Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz, minister of Investment, Trade and Industry ( MITI), remarked,” We welcome Vantage Data Centers ‘ plan to build an AI-ready data center at their KUL2 campus, a strategic move that will not only support Malaysia’s AI aspirations but also drive economic growth, create new job opportunities, and propel the country’s digital transformation forward”.

” As the’ brain, lungs and brain tissues’ of the digital trend, data centres facilitate the launch or expansion of standard financial activity. Data centers constitute the internet’s foundation, which underpins digitalization as it is known nowadays, along with sky technology and network infrastructure. This has, among people, enabled small businesses to flourish, while closing the world socio-economic distance. Malaysia has the advantage of facilitating more data centers, mainly AI-focused data centers, which could help Malaysia’s goal of 3, 000 wise factories by 2030. All these may assist Malaysia position itself as a leading regional hotspot for AI-enabled manufacturing”, he added. &nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp,

However, Gobind Singh Deo, secretary of Digital, said,” Malaysia is utterly committed to accelerating its modernization agenda, and positioning itself as a leader in the online economy, mainly in Southeast Asia, as the nation assumes the ASEAN chair second year. A strong online infrastructure that supports data storage and worldwide connectivity will be a important enabler of economic growth and innovation, while recognized as a crucial component of this endeavor.

Sikh Shamsul Ibrahim Sikh Abdul Majid, CEO of MIDA, said,” This is a big win for our country’s modern equipment ecology, and it’s a testament to the demand for high-quality information center companies in the region. As a partner, we’ve been working closely with Vantage to ensure that their investment is a success. We’ve provided them with comprehensive facilitation and support, and we’re confident that they’ll be able to leverage Malaysia’s unique strengths to achieve regional and global excellence”.

Kamarul Ariffin Abdul Samad, CEO of Cyberview, said,” With the expansion of Vantage Data Centers in Cyberjaya, we mark a significant milestone that underscores Cyberjaya’s standing as a premier destination for hyperscale data center providers. This development confirms Malaysia’s strategic importance as well as our unwavering commitment to promoting innovation and technological advancement. We are demonstrating our commitment to creating a dynamic and supportive future-ready digital ecosystem in Cyberjaya by aligning with the government’s vision to advance the digital economy.

In addition, Vantage has signed an Electricity Supply Agreement with Tenaga Nasional Berhad ( TNB), for 500MVA-rated power capacity via a dedicated 275kV high-voltage substation for KUL2.

” We have simplified the process of powering data centers under TNB’s Green Lane Pathway initiative by bringing all requirements for grid connectivity through our One-Stop-Centre,” said Kamal Arifin A. Rahman, TNB’s chief retail officer. The project’s accelerated delivery time is a sign of TNB’s commitment to speed up and expedite the powering of data centers, according to the statement.

Kamal Arifin emphasized that TNB’s grid infrastructure can provide reliable, stable, and secure power at a scale while also allowing the growing number of data centers in Malaysia to use renewable energy sources. Our support for data centers will help reduce carbon footprints, helping to advance Malaysia’s sustainability goals and economic growth, given that TNB’s main goal is to accelerate the transition to renewable energy and address climate change.

Vantage’s APAC portfolio includes 452MW of operational and planned IT capacity across five markets: Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan.

Continue Reading

Google is an ‘illegal’ monopoly – and the internet will never be the same – Asia Times

On Monday ( August 5 ) a US federal judge ruled Google has violated antitrust laws, saying the organization

is a corporation, and it has acted as one to keep its dominance.

Google disputes the decision. Its president of global affairs, Kent Walker, said:” this decision recognises that Google offers the best search engine, but concludes that we should n’t be allowed to make it easily available”.

However, the landmark choice has shaken the basis of Google’s company, its search engine. Google has been the mainstay of the industry for well over ten years. Competition has little room to assert itself in the tech sector, which apparently holds about 90 % of the US online business.

Google has been able to maintain its position of supremacy thanks to long-standing agreements with businesses like Apple and Samsung, which make Google the definition search engine for their websites.

Google has been able to charge higher rates for research marketing because of these monopolistic practices. This search engine has become the most straightforward, quick, and trustworthy source for the majority of people because it serves as the default computer across a variety of programs.

Due to this, competitors have much room to offer similar services at more marketable prices, bolstering the company’s website advertising business.

What does this mean for Google?

A separate moving may be held to decide what fines Google and its parent company, Alphabet, may face. The software giant will probably face both imposed sanctions and legal workarounds intended to lessen its standing, though.

Generally, fines have not been the only method of enforcing antitrust regulations as they do not show long-term impacts. This is especially true for a multi-trillion-dollar business like as Google.

The use of a” alternative screen” is one of the possible mitigation measures. Instead of choosing Google as their proxy search engine, users could choose from different available search engines.

Google has previously been found guilty of breaking competitive rules. The European Union has fined it a total of €8.25 billion ( US$$ 9 billion ) for three separate antitrust violations in the past ten years.

Competitive laws are carried out domestically, and each country’s laws have their own antitrust laws. Google is facing these fees on two different countries because of this.

Over the years, Google has continued to charm the EU charges. The business has previously confirmed that it will contest the US decision.

What does this mean for people of the web?

Competitive laws are designed to strengthen competition. By preventing business practices that encourage cruel monopolies, stifle competition, and impose supremacy or power, they are there to protect consumers.

Due to its position of dominance over another search engines, smaller competitors have been unable to operate fairly due to the focus market it has created.

Because of the low visibility competitors, Google does charge large advertising costs.

The new US decision, alongside the EU decisions, may be the first actions towards opening the software industry up to other companies. In turn, this may encourage more equal opposition, which would be a gain for customers.

Opposition fuels incentives for development. This opportunity is suffocated under the supremacy of one dominant player when there is only one opportunity available, as frequently appears to be the case with search engines.

Although antitrust rules are only enforced on local levels, it’s possible that the benefits of the EU and US decisions may include ripple effects beyond these markets.

What does this mean for the contest for AI power?

Some questions were raised during the trial regarding how unfairly Google’s monopoly as the default search engine has benefited it in the artificial intelligence ( AI ) race.

The Google search engine’s definition agreements and terms of service have given the company access to a large amount of customer research data that can be used to teach AI models. Google might use this information as a means of establishing a position of dominance in artificial intelligence because of its simple access.

Google’s placement in the contest for AI supremacy could be changed if it leaves Google as the default search engine for platforms like Apple and Samsung.

As like, it may also change the upcoming path of the entire internet.

Zena Assaad is Top Lecturer, School of Engineering, Australian National University

The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.

Continue Reading

How Trump could make Bitcoin great again – Asia Times

The US presidential campaign has turned to Bitcoin, a crypto known for its price fluctuation and negative effects on the environment.

Donald Trump, the former US president and Democratic candidate for the upcoming vote, hosted the biggest Cryptocurrency meeting of the year in Nashville on July 27.

If Trump is re-elected as president after the election, he said in his speech that he would make the United States the” crypto capital of the planet and the world’s Bitcoin power.” The crowd roared out in awe of his remarks.

Trump’s desire to dominate the blockchain sector is almost certainly social. Since accepting bitcoin gifts in May, the Trump plan has already raised US$ 25 million from the industry, and more are anticipated to follow the Nashville event.

His public support of crypto definitely boosted trader optimism. The price of Bitcoin surged to almost$ 70, 000 on July 29, its highest level in more than six weeks, before dropping back to$ 62, 000 a few days later.

However, issues remain regarding whether Trump’s policies will be implemented if he is elected president. Even so, it’s unclear whether Trump’s pro-crypto policy will include a long-term impact on Bitcoin’s value.

Currency’s price surged and fell within a year

A chart showing the fluctuation in Bitcoin's price over the past month.
A graph showing the variation in Bitcoin’s rate over the past month. Image: Google Finance, CC BY-NC-SA

In his statement, Trump pledged to keep” 100 % of all the Cryptocurrency” the US government already holds or acquires in the future if he is elected.

Some countries, including the US, keep Bitcoin. Cryptocurrency that has been seized from offenders accounts for a large portion of these assets. How to handle this seized crypto is a complicated issue.

The victims of crypto crime might receive a opposing message if they are not selling it. Chinese fraud victims, for example, have previously urged the UK government to return £3 billion ($ 3.8 billion ) in Bitcoin held by London police.

Recovering stolen Bitcoin may be a part of their actions if governments really want to safeguard consumers from crime and fraud in bitcoin markets. So, Trump’s promise to keep all of America’s Bitcoin investments may not be functional.

Besides that, Bitcoin was designed primarily as a fragmented money. The fact that it operated separately from any central authority was its main draw.

Since its commencement in 2009, the degree of autonomy has decreased. Key mining pools, which combine their computing resources to improve their chances of “mining” fresh Bitcoins, currently own a sizable portion of the currency.

Big people may become even more powerful if they add significant government holdings to Bitcoin. Most cryptocurrency users probably do n’t want this.

Another major impediment to the widespread adoption of Bitcoin and another blockchain-based inventions is the lack of regulatory clarity. From this viewpoint, Trump’s pro-crypto plan may be welcomed by the blockchain society, as he may create a more positive environment in the US for crypto miners, startups and other crypto entrepreneurs.

Trump criticized vague and overly stringent US laws at the Nashville conference, threatened to fire SEC chair Gary Gensler due to his antagonistic attitude toward the sector, and warned that Kamala Harris ‘ candidacy would derail the blockchain community.

Trump said:” We does have restrictions, but from now on the guidelines will be written by people who love your business, not love your business”. However, the details of how these fresh” crypto-friendly” officials will achieve their goals if Trump is elected remain unclear.

In 2023, the SEC led key studies into crypto’s major troublemakers. The leader of the now-bankrupt FTX crypto exchange, Sam Bankman-Fried, for example, was sentenced to 25 years in prison for fraud and was ordered to renounce US$ 11.2 billion.

The US has the power to make the area safer for all participants. However, it’s uncertain whether these anti-crime measures will remain under Trump’s fresh crypto-friendly administration.

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the November election, crypto users have different concerns about the government’s Bitcoin holdings.

Governments selling their Bitcoin holdings contribute to the volatility of the currency, which has fallen by 15 % since Germany started selling off roughly € 2.5 billion ($ 2.7 billion ) of confiscated Bitcoin at the beginning of June. However, Bitcoin is also a highly speculative property that is vulnerable to news, social media, and media coverage.

The position of the US government on Bitcoin’s economic issues, which are the subject of many media censure, may also impact its value in the long term.

To add new tokens to the blockchain and remedy various scientific puzzles, Bitcoin mining usually uses a lot of computing power. It uses a lot of electricity and water, as well as producing a lot of electrical waste.

In January of this year, the US government had started a project to track mining operations ‘ power consumption. A federal prosecutor in Texas, who ruled that the business would suffer “irreparable harm” if the new demands were implemented, halted the action.

Communities that are affected by Bitcoin’s enormous reference consumption does not agree with Trump’s pledge to aid US Bitcoin mining. For instance, households in Texas are currently paying higher energy bills in regions where Bitcoin is mined on a massive range.

The US and other important international political parties ‘ goals, among others, determine Bitcoin’s future. Regardless of government rules, there are numerous factors that affect the price of Bitcoin, but any promises should be read with precaution.

For Trump’s vows to impact Bitcoin’s cost in the long term, they must be backed by large and regular measures. Often, they will only bring about momentary price fluctuations, as they have been reported in the previous week.

Larisa Yarovaya is Director of the Centre for Digital Finance, Associate Professor in Finance, University of Southampton

The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.

Continue Reading

Nikkei’s Black Monday 2.0 triggers contagion talk – Asia Times

Buyers are looking for relationships, past occasions that offer some perspective on what may lie ahead for forex markets, as the Japanese yen surges.

The Nikkei 225 Stock Average is leading a worldwide property sell-off, leading to a frenetic research. The Bank of Japan’s July 31 price climb was followed by a softer-than-expected US work record. On Monday, the Nikkei plunged 4, 451 factors, more than Black Monday in 1987.

Probably, no great consequence exists owing to risks surrounding Japan thanks to the “yen-carry trade”. Although the US dollar is by far the most popular reserve currency, trade became as crowded as it ever was as a result of expensively borrowing in the yen and putting those funds into higher-yielding assets abroad.

This explains why, when the renminbi rises, things turn around for everything, from Chinese corporate debt to Indian property to American bonds to Brazilian options to Argentine bonds to Wall Street stocks to commodities. When the world’s largest creditor nation zags, issues tend to zigzag quickly.

” The hype is all about the disease consequence of this extreme keep assault, underscored by fears of a hard getting in the US and a severe meltdown in Tokyo’s markets, which now appear to be self-perpetuating”, says Stephen Innes, managing partner of SPI Asset Management.

According to Kinsale Buying analysts,” the yen have industry has been used to finance bull markets in almost every advantage over the years,” and if it is” starting to change, it has negative implications for stocks and other risk assets.”

Seldom is that truer than presently as Black Monday 2.0 knocks Asia, sending the Chinese yuan higher, too. &nbsp,

As the yen’s rebound against the dollar increased by about 13 % from the previous low on July, and stocks began to decline, the yen’s market tensions boiled over on Monday. The most danced decline in Japanese government bonds in more than 20 years is expected.

” Some investors who were borrowing japanese at low interest rates, converted them to US dollars and used this to get US companies”, notes Daniela Sabin Hathorn, senior industry analyst at Capital.com. However, with higher interest rates in Japan, they are now facing forex losses as well.

The Japanese background music of the global financial system has been playing for 25 years, transforming into the monetary liquidity version of the world’s financial system. That is now a sizable risk that traders are n’t all that knowledgeable about managing in real-time.

Part of the problem is complacency. Over the last two decades, investors have survived myriad moments of high yen-carry trade tension. Generally, though, the related hijinks in asset markets never quite matched fears about giant reckonings.

In this way, perhaps the carry trade is best understood as a shark from” Jaws.” The recurring theme of Steven Spielberg’s 1975 film is that the shark will always reappear when it’s least expected to — and with exponentially growing ferociousness.

Not because the threat is gone, just because the yen’s rally in support of the BOJ’s rate increase has n’t sunk a lot of large hedge funds. Contrary to what BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda predicted in the coming months, more rate increases will be made.

At the same time, Japan’s Ministry of Finance has been interviewing aggressively below the surface. These yen purchases, coupled with prospects for more BOJ tightening, could send the yen back to levels not seen in decades.

No one can say how unstable that might be. Since 1999, the BOJ has held rates at or near zero. Since 2001, it has been playing with quantitative easing. The result of all this free money is that almost every sector of Japan’s economy is now dependent, decade after decade.

Take Japanese government bonds ( JGBs ), which are still the biggest financial asset held by, well, everyone. If JGB yields rise toward 2 % or 3 %, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, endowments, the postal system and the growing ranks of retirees would sustain painful losses.

The BOJ is n’t moving forward with what Ueda did last week due to this mutually assured destruction dynamic. It’s impossible to predict where significant risks might arise now that the BOJ has entered these shark-infested financial waters.

Granted, there are valid reasons why the BOJ feels the need to tap the brakes. It is aware that Japan’s animal spirits were more killed by weak yen policies after more than 20 years.

Tokyo’s economic game was made more urgent by ultralow rates. Corporate executives were under increased pressure to innovate, reorganize, and swing for the fences as a result of the yen’s decline. Additionally, rising energy and food prices cause inflation in Japan, which hurts domestic purchasing power.

Ueda has also started the long-diverse normalization process. It is unpredictable about how foreign exchange markets are affected. and risking asset markets everywhere. Perhaps grave risk, if Team Ueda overplays its hand in tightening.

” The pivot towards a more hawkish policy stance by BOJ is adding to the general pressure on risk assets globally”, says Carlos&nbsp, Casanova, economist at Union Bancaire Privée. ” This shift comes as Japan moves away from its decades-long ultra-loose monetary policy, contributing to increased market volatility and uncertainty”.

More volatility is anticipated, according to Casanova, and the yen grew following the tightening move. But, he adds,” the domestic economy remains sluggish, while US demand is showing signs of softening. The weakening yen tailwind is likely to stop as anticipation for a Federal Reserve cut in September builds. Investors will need to see upside surprises in revenues and earnings to drive further increases as valuations are now at the upper end of their range, which is roughly 17.5 times earnings.

Udith Sikand, analyst at Gavekal Research, says “yen-funded carry trades causing a’ snowball effect’ for other asset classes” .He adds that such” self-reinforcing declines are usually only broken when macro fundamentals decisively shift, or policymakers step in to correct a problem”.

Because of its role as a source of funding for carry trades, Japan’s debt market has long been an anchor for global investors, Sikand explains. This is because the Bank of Japan has consistently tried to keep short rates at zero while putting forth comprehensive efforts to reduce longer-term government bond yields. Carry trades work so long as the funding currency depreciates, or at least remains stable. The death knell of these trades is an appreciation of the funding currency.

It follows that the yen’s surge “has triggered margin calls for yen-funded speculators”, Sikand says. It’s difficult to determine the overall size of these long-short positions, but anecdotal evidence suggests that the decline in high-yielding currencies like the Brazilian real and the Mexican peso, along with the sell-off in US tech stocks, is a result.

Concerns about US employment growth, with a dash of Warren Buffett, ratchet up the selloff.

According to Goldman Sachs economist Jan Hatzius, the odds of a US recession have increased from 15 % to 25 %. Generally, he notes,” we continue to see recession risk as limited” because of a dearth of serious imbalances. Even so, the outlook is becoming more uncertain.

Some think US worries are overdone. George Lagarias, chief economist at Mazars, argues that falling stocks are” not due to an impending recession. Stocks are naturally correcting, and bonds are rising due to worse-than-expected macroeconomic data”.

A further correction, according to Lagarias, would” then thin out the market and allow investors to re-deploy cash at more reasonable valuations” if the Fed responded quickly enough to prevent a risk assert correction from actually causing a recession.

Yet “one very important difference in 2024 is]the ] extreme degree to which risk assets have front-run Fed cuts”, says Bank of America Corp economist Michael Hartnett.

Meanwhile, news that Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway sell nearly half of its massive stake in Apple Inc. The Omaha-based conglomerate offloaded a little more than 49 % of its stake, a transaction that spooked US markets.

In Japan’s case, the trouble is that there’s no blueprint for what Ueda is trying to pull off. The BOJ tried it back in 2006 and 2007. The central bank was able to raise rates twice to 0.5 % at the time. Japan slid toward recession soon afterward, angering the political establishment.

As the stock market declines and growth contracts, Ueda would almost certainly face his own torrent of negative press. Can he survive the storm, or not? It’s anyone’s guess. However, all other world markets can do is to apprehensively anticipate that the BOJ will correct the rate hikes ‘ magnitude, timing, and sequence.

Tokyo will continue to” stay on its toes and closely watch market developments,” according to Yoshimasa Hayashi, a spokesman for the Japanese government.

The government will continue its efforts to completely deflationate and transition to a growth-driven economy, he added,” we’re aware there are various evacuations about the stocks plunge this time around, and about the status of the Japanese economy.”

Is it still unclear whether the investors ‘ long-feared “doom effect” results from a surge in the yen? That may not come to pass, meaning fears about the yen-carry trade blowing up are overdone. It’s just as likely, though, the shark will reappear in short order and spook traders around the globe.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading