Tariffs on India: Can Trump’s sweeping global duties spark a manufacturing boom?

last an afternoon
Soutik Biswas
Getty Images Employees at a garment manufacturing factory of Viraj Exports Pvt. in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, on Tuesday, Oct. 11, 2022Getty Images

Donald Trump’s broad tariffs have impacted global commerce, but disruption frequently leads to new opportunities.

Starting 9 April, Indian goods will face tariffs of up to 27% (Trump’s tariff chart lists India’s rate as 26%, but the official order says 27% – a discrepancy seen for other nations too). Before the tariff hike, US rates across trading partners averaged 3.3%, among the lowest globally, compared to India’s 17%, according to the White House.

India “presents an opportunity” in textiles, electronics, and machinery” with the US imposing even higher tariffs on China ( 54 % ), Vietnam ( 46 % ), Thailand ( 36 % ), and Bangladesh ( 37 % ), according to the Delhi-based think tank Global Trade Research Initiative ( GTRI ).

Great export tariffs for China and Bangladesh give Indian textile manufacturers more room to grow in the US market. If Taiwan’s system and plan help are strengthened, India can tap into package, testing, and lower-end chip production, despite Taiwan’s dominance in electronics. Even a 32 % tariff-driven limited supply chain transition from Taiwan might benefit India.

The industries that are dominated by China and Thailand are mature for tariff-driven transfer, especially in the fields of technology, cars, and products. According to a word from GTRI, India can make money by attracting purchase, expanding production, and increasing exports to the US.

May India be able to capitalize on the occasion?

Higher taxes have raised costs for businesses that are dependent on global value chains, putting strain on India’s ability to compete in foreign markets. India has a major trade deficit despite growing imports, largely driven by services. India accounts for only 1.5 % of global exports. Trump has consistently referred to India as a “tariff ruler” and a “big offender” of trade ties. With his fresh taxes, there is a concern that Indian imports will be less aggressive.

Reuters A man walks past a screen displaying U.S. President Donald Trump, at the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) ahead of Trump's tariff plans, in Mumbai, India, April 2, 2025Reuters

Nevertheless, Ajay Srivastava of GTRI believes that the US’s mercantilist price regime could spur India’s benefit from global supply chain adjustments.

India may improve its ease of doing business, invest in shipping and equipment, and uphold policy balance to fully exploit these options, according to the statement. If all of these requirements are met, India is well-positioned to become a major international hotspot for manufacturing and exporting in the upcoming years.

That’s much simpler to say than to do. Places like Malaysia and Indonesia may be better positioned than India, according to Biswajit Dhar, a business professional from the Delhi-based Council for Social Development think pond.

” We may have some lost ground in the garment industry then that Bangladesh is subject to higher tariffs, but the reality is that we have treated the industry as a twilight sector and made no investments.” How may we really benefit from these tax changes without expanding our ability? says Mr. Dhar.

Since February, India has ramped up efforts to win Trump’s favour – pledging $25bn in US energy imports, courting Washington as a top defence supplier and exploring F-35 fighter deals. To ease trade tensions, it scrapped the 6% digital ad tax, cut bourbon whiskey tariffs to 100% from 150% and slashed duties on luxury cars and solar cells. Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s Starlink nears final approval. The two countries have launched extensive trade talks to narrow the US’s $45bn trade deficit with India.

However, India was unable to leave the price war.

India may be concerned because there was a possibility that continuing trade negotiations would protect it from bilateral tariffs. According to Abhijit Das, former mind of the Centre for WTO Research at the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, imposing these taxes right now is a significant setback.

Getty Images Workers assemble mobile phones at a Dixon Technologies factory in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, on Thursday, Jan. 28, 2021.Getty Images

One upside: pharmaceuticals are exempt from reciprocal tariffs, a relief for India’s generic drug makers. India supplies nearly half of all generic medicines in the US, where these lower-cost alternatives account for 90% of prescriptions.

Exports in important industries like technology, executive products, automotive components, industrial machines, and marine products could suffer, yet. Given the significant investments made through India’s flagship “production-linked incentives” ( PLI ) schemes to boost local manufacturing, it would be especially troubling for electronics.

” I’m concerned about the capacity of our producers because many of them are small producers who will struggle to withstand a 27 % tax increase, making them unprofitable.” The problem only gets worse as the firm costs go up, and the trade infrastructure keeps getting worse. According to Mr. Dhar,” we’re at a big disadvantage.”

Some people believe that Trump’s bargaining chip in India’s trade negotiations is these taxes. The most recent statement from the US Trade Representative reveals Washington’s dissatisfaction with India’s business practices.

The report, which was made public on Monday, highlights India’s tight import regulations for dairy, pork, and fish, which require non-GMO certification without any supporting evidence from science. Additionally, it criticizes India’s slow acceptance of genetically modified products and stent and implant prices.

India has been placed on the” Priority Watch List” due to concerns over intellectual property rights, which the report cites insufficient patent privileges, and lack of business secret laws. The record also has concerns about limiting dish policies and mandates for data localization, which further strain trade ties. Washington is concerned that India’s regulatory strategy is extremely in line with that of China. US exports could increase by at least$ 5.3 billion annually if these obstacles were removed, according to the White House.

Being in the middle of business negotiations just makes our risk worse, according to the author. This isn’t just about business exposure; it’s the whole package, according to Mr. Dhar. Additionally, expanding your opportunities and gaining a competitive advantage over Vietnam or China takes period.

Continue Reading

Asia’s Best Companies Poll 2025: Market winners | FinanceAsia

For a 25th year, FinanceAsia publishes its highly regarded benchmark of Asia’s best companies.

Based on nomination by Asia’s active community of influential investors and financial analysts, the poll evaluates the corporate behaviour and performance of Asian peers over the past 12 months.

The FA team is delighted to announce the 2025 winners below for the market categories.The industry winners can be found here

Once again, following positive market participation, we have decided to award up to three medals per category to reflect corporate achievements. Gold, Silver and Bronze medallists are detailed where applicable.

Congratulations to all the winners. Read on for the winning companies in the following markets:  

BEST MANAGED COMPANY

China
Gold – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd
Silver – China Telecom
Bronze – China Mobile

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd

Silver – Link REIT

Silver – Sino Land

Bronze – MTR Corporation Limited

 

India

Gold – Tata Motors

Silver – Axis Capital

Bronze – Bajaj Finance

 

Indonesia

Gold – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Silver – Astra International

Silver – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – GoTo Gojek Tokopedia

 

Malaysia

Gold – Maybank

Silver – CIMB Bank Berhad

Bronze – AmFunds Investment Management Berhad

Bronze – YTL Corporation Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Ayala Corporation

Silver – Bank of the Philippine Islands

Silver – Megawide Construction Corporation

Bronze – Citicore Renewable Energy Corporation

 

Singapore

Gold – DBS Bank

Silver – Singapore Airlines

Bronze – CapitaLand

 

South Korea

Gold – SK Hynix

Silver – Samsung Electronics

Bronze – Hyundai Motor Co Ltd

 

Taiwan

Gold – Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd

Silver – CTBC Financial Holding

Silver – MediaTek Inc.

Bronze – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

Bronze – Sercomm Corporation

 

Thailand

Gold – B. Grimm Power PCL

Silver – Global Power Synergy PCL

Silver – Thai Oil Public Company Limited 

Bronze – Central Pattana

Bronze – Gulf Energy Development PCL

 

MOST COMMITTED TO ESG

 

China

Gold – Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Silver – China Telecom

Bronze – China Mobile

Bronze – Trip.com

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd

Silver – Link REIT

Bronze – Hengan International Group Company, Ltd.

 

India

Gold – Axis Capital

Silver – Bajaj Finance

Bronze – Tata Consultancy Services Ltd

 

Indonesia

Gold – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Silver – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – GoTo Gojek Tokopedia

 

Malaysia

Gold – Yinson Holdings Berhad

Silver – Maybank

Bronze – AmFunds Investment Management Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Ayala Corporation

Silver – Megawide Construction Corporation

Bronze – SM Investments Corporation

 

Singapore

Gold – OCBC Bank

Silver – City Developments Limited

Bronze – Seatrium

 

South Korea

Gold – Samsung Electronics

Silver – Hyundai Motor Co Ltd

Bronze – Hanwha Ocean

 

Taiwan

Gold – Wistron NeWeb Corporation

Silver – CTBC Financial Holding

Bronze – Sercomm Corporation

 

Thailand

Gold – Global Power Synergy PCL

Silver – B. Grimm Power PCL

Bronze – Gulf Energy Development PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Vingroup

Silver – Masan Group

Bronze – THACO Group

 

BEST INVESTOR RELATIONS

China

Gold – China Telecom

Silver – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Bronze – China Mobile

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd

Silver – Link REIT

Silver – MTR Corporation Limited

Bronze – Midea International Corp Co Ltd

 

India

Gold – ICICI Bank Ltd

Silver – HDFC Bank Ltd

 

Indonesia

Gold – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Silver – GoTo Gojek Tokopedia

Bronze – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

 

Malaysia

Gold – CIMB Bank Berhad

Silver – Maybank

Bronze – Yinson Holdings Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Bloomberry Resorts Corporation

Silver – Ayala Corporation

Silver – SM Investments Corporation

Bronze – Meralco

 

Singapore

Gold – CapitaLand

Silver – SATS Ltd

Bronze – Mapletree Investments

 

South Korea

Gold – Hanwha Ocean

Silver – LG Electronics

Bronze – SK Hynix

 

Taiwan

Gold – Wistron NeWeb Corporation

Silver – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

Bronze – Sercomm Corporation

 

Thailand

Gold – PTT Public Company Limited

Silver – B. Grimm Power PCL

Bronze – Global Power Synergy PCL

Bronze – Gulf Energy Development PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Vingroup

Silver – Masan Group

Bronze – Mobile World Investment Corporation

 

BEST LARGE CAP COMPANY

 

China

Gold – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Silver – China Telecom

Bronze – China Mobile

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Link REIT

Silver – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd

Bronze – CLP Holdings Ltd

 

India

Gold – Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd

Silver – HDFC Bank Ltd

Bronze – Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd

Bronze – Tata Consultancy Services Ltd

 

Indonesia

Gold – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Silver – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – Astra International

 

Malaysia

Gold – Maybank

 

Philippines

Gold – SM Investments Corporation

Silver – International Container Terminal Services, Inc.

Bronze – SM Prime Holdings, Inc.

 

South Korea

Gold – Hyundai Motor Co Ltd

Silver – Hanwha Ocean

Silver – POSCO

Bronze – Samsung Biologics

 

Taiwan

Gold – Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd

Silver – MediaTek Inc.

Bronze – EVA Airways Corporation

Bronze – Far EasTone Telecommunications Co., Ltd

 

Thailand

Gold – Bangkok Dusit Medical Services PCL

Silver – PTT Exploration and Production (PTTEP)

Bronze – Advanced Info Service PCL

 

BEST MID CAP COMPANY

China

Gold – AsiaInfo Technologies Limited

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – CIMC Enric Holdings Ltd

Silver – Fortune REIT

 

India

Gold – Prestige Estates Projects Ltd

Silver – ICICI Securities Ltd

 

Indonesia

Gold – GoTo Gojek Tokopedia

 

Malaysia

Gold – Sunway Berhad

Silver – YTL Corporation Berhad

Bronze – Hap Seng Consolidated Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Manila Water Company, Inc.

Silver – Jollibee Foods Corporation

Bronze – Aboitiz Power

 

South Korea

Gold – LG Electronics

Silver – KIWOOM Securities

 

Taiwan

Gold – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

Silver – Arcadyan Technology Corporation

Bronze – Elite Material Co Ltd

 

Thailand

Gold – Minor International PCL

Silver – Global Power Synergy PCL

Bronze – WHA Corporation PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Vingroup

Silver – Masan Group

Bronze – Mobile World Investment Corporation

 

BEST SMALL CAP COMPANY

 

China

Gold – Digital China Holdings

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Far East Consortium International Limited

Silver – Vitasoy International Holdings Limited

Bronze – SF REIT

 

India

Gold – Aavas Financiers

Silver – Indian Energy Exchange Ltd

 

Malaysia

Gold – Yinson Holdings Berhad

Silver – Top Glove Corporation Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Citicore Renewable Energy Corporation

Silver – Bloomberry Resorts Corporation

Silver – Megawide Construction Corporation

Bronze – D&L Industries Inc.

 

Taiwan

Gold – Sercomm Corporation

Silver – Fositek Corporation

Bronze – Merida Industry Co., Ltd

 

Thailand

Gold – Ratch Group PCL

Silver – Bangkok Chain Hospital PCL

Bronze – Central Plaza Hotel PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Vinh Hoan Corporation

Silver – CMC Corporation

Silver – International Dairy Products JSC

Bronze – GELEX Group

 

BEST CEO

 

China

Gold – Zhongyue Chen – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Silver – Jie Yang – China Mobile

Bronze – Xiaowei Luan – China Communications Services

Bronze – Biao He – China Mobile

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Raymond Kwok – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd

Silver – George Hongchoy – Link REIT

Bronze – Shixian Lai  – ANTA Sports Products Ltd

 

India

Gold – Deepak C. Mehta – Deepak Nitrite Ltd

Silver – T.V. Narendran – Tata Steel

 

Indonesia

Gold – Sunarso – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Silver – Darmawan Junaidi – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Silver – Royke Tumilaar  – PT BNI (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – Ali Rukmijah  – Bank Sahabat Sampoerna

 

Malaysia

Gold – Khairussaleh Ramli – Maybank

Silver – Tony Fernandes  – Capital A Berhad

Bronze – Novan, Amirudin – CIMB Bank Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Edgar B. Saavedra – Megawide Construction Corporation

Silver – Teresita Sy-Coson – BDO Unibank

Silver – Oliver Y. Tan – Citicore Renewable Energy Corporation

Bronze – Jeffrey Lim – SM Prime Holdings, Inc.

 

Singapore

Gold – Piyush Gupta – DBS Bank

Silver – Loh Boon Chye – Singapore Exchange

 

South Korea

Gold – Chey Tae-won – SK Group

Silver – Han Jong-hee – Samsung Electronics

Bronze – Kim Seung-youn – Hanwha Group

 

Taiwan

Gold – C. C. Wei – Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd

Silver – Suming, Chen – Universal Microwave Technology, Inc.

Bronze – Vivian Ling – Caliway Biopharmaceuticals Co. Ltd

Bronze – Chee Ching – Far Eastone Telecommunications Co., Ltd

 

Thailand

Gold – Dr. Harald Link – B. Grimm Power PCL

Silver – Niwat Adirek – BCPG PCL

Silver – Sarath Ratanavadi – Gulf Energy Development PCL

Bronze – Dr. Chalerm Harnphanich – Bangkok Chain Hospital PCL

Bronze – Dr. Poramaporn Prasarttong-osoth – Bangkok Dusit Medical Services PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Danny Le – Masan Group

 

BEST CFO 

China

Gold – Yuzhuo Li – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Silver – Ronghua Li – China Mobile

Bronze – Aqiang Shen – China Communications Services

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Toby Xu – Alibaba Group (HK)

Silver – Alexandre Jean Keisser – CLP Holdings Ltd

 

India

Gold – Samir Seksaria – Tata Consultancy Services Ltd

 

Indonesia

Gold – Sigit Prastowo – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Silver – Viviana Dyah Ayu Retno Kumalasari – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – Henky Suryaputra – Bank Sahabat Sampoerna

 

Malaysia

Gold – Malique Firdauz Ahmad Sidique – Maybank

Silver – Joyce Tan  – Sunway Berhad

Bronze – Chek Wu Kong – Duopharma Biotech Berhad

Bronze – Guillaume François Jest – Yinson Holdings Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – John Nai Peng Ong – SM Prime Holdings, Inc.

Silver – Jez G. dela Cruz – Megawide Construction Corporation

Bronze – Estella Tuason-Occeña – Bloomberry Resorts Corporation

Bronze – Richard Shin – Jollibee Foods Corporation

 

Singapore

Gold – Yuen Kuan Moon – Singtel

Silver – Koo Chung Chang  – AIA Group

Bronze – Lim Hock Chye – Keppel Corporation

 

Taiwan

Gold – Henry Hao Jen Wang – Fubon Bank

Silver – Wendell Huang  – Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd

Bronze – David (Chien Cheng) Wang  – Far Eastern New Century Corporation

 

Thailand

Gold – Chanamas Sasnanand – PTT Exploration and Production (PTTEP)

Silver – Yupapin Wangviwat – Gulf Energy Development PCL

Bronze – Siriwong Borvornboonrutai – B. Grimm Power PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Max Sunarcia – THACO Group

Silver – Do Thi Quynh Trang  – Masan Group

 

BEST COO

 

China

Gold – Jian Qin – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Silver – Zhanwei Cui – China Communications Services

 

Malaysia

Gold – Ariff Azahar  – Maybank

 

Philippines

Gold – Carlos Cruz – International Container Terminal Services, Inc.

 

South Korea

Bronze – Nam Seok-Woo  – Samsung Electronics

 

Taiwan

Gold – Tungyi Wu – Universal Microwave Technology, Inc.

Silver – Ben Lin – Sercomm Corporation

Bronze – Jeffrey Gau – Wistron NeWeb Corporation

 

Thailand

Bronze – Nopadej Karnasuta – B. Grimm Power PCL

 

Vietnam

Silver – Metha Pingsuthiwong – Tisco Group

 

BEST CTO

China

Gold – Jun Zhi, Wang – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

 

Taiwan

Gold – Jyh-Shing Roger Jang – E-Sun

 

Thailand

Bronze – Woottichai Jarernpol  – Krungthai Card PCL

 

Indonesia

Gold – Arga M. Nugraha  – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

 

Thailand

Gold – Dennis Thorsten Trawnitschek – SCB X PCL

 

Taiwan

Silver – Chris Lin – Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd

 

Thailand

Silver – Sutthikan Rungsrithong – TMBThanachart Bank Plc.

 

MOST COMMITTED TO DEI

 

China

Gold – China Telecom

Silver – China Mobile

Bronze – China Communications Services

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd

Silver – Henderson Land Development Co., Ltd

Bronze – Link REIT

 

India

Gold – Travelogy India Pvt Ltd

 

Indonesia

Gold – PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk

Silver – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – GoTo Gojek Tokopedia

 

Malaysia

Gold – CIMB Bank Berhad

Silver – Maybank

Bronze – Top Glove Corporation Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Citicore Renewable Energy Corporation

Silver – Ayala Corporation

Bronze – International Container Terminal Services, Inc.

 

South Korea

Gold – Hanwha Ocean

Silver – Samsung Electronics

Bronze – SK Hynix

 

Taiwan

Gold – Wistron NeWeb Corporation

Silver – CTBC Financial Holding

Bronze – Sercomm Corporation

 

Thailand

Gold – Gulf Energy Development PCL

Silver – Global Power Synergy PCL

Bronze – B. Grimm Power PCL

 

Vietnam

Gold – Vingroup

Silver – Mobile World Investment Corporation

Bronze – Masan Group

 

BEST USE OF TECHNOLOGY

China

Gold – China Unicom (Hong Kong) Ltd

Silver – China Telecom

Bronze – China Mobile

 

Hong Kong SAR

Gold – CIMC Enric Holdings Ltd

Silver – Hongkong Land Holdings Limited

Bronze – Swire Properties

 

India

Gold – Dito Telecommunity Corporation

Silver – Sun Telecommunication

 

Indonesia

Gold – GoTo Gojek Tokopedia

Silver – PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk

Bronze – Telkom

 

Malaysia

Gold – KPJ Healthcare Berhad

Silver – Yinson Holdings Berhad

Bronze – Uzma Berhad

 

Philippines

Gold – Bank of the Philippine Islands

Silver – Union Bank

Bronze – Globe Telecom, Inc.

 

South Korea

Gold – Samsung Biologics

Silver – Hanwha Ocean

Bronze – SK Hynix

 

Taiwan

Gold – Sercomm Corporation

Silver – MediaTek Inc.

Bronze – Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd

 

Thailand

Gold – SCB X PCL

Silver – Advanced Info Service PCL

Bronze – TMBThanachart Bank Plc.

 

Vietnam

Gold – Vingroup

Silver – Masan Group

Bronze – FPT Corporation

 


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

World feels it when spending habits of 500 million Chinese change – Asia Times

China’s financial rocket ride appears to be coming to an end, or at least slowing down. After the property developer Evergrande collapse in 2024, growth dropped from 8.4 % in 2021 to 4.5 % today, youth unemployment increased to 16.9 %, and cities are rife with unfinished buildings.

On Chinese social media platforms Weibo and Red Note, a term has been circulating for a while to sum up what’s happening: “garbage day.”

It is used to refer to the final days of a match whose goal is already known. The best athletes don’t play. The chair people assume the lead. Because there is less at stake, no single tries as difficult.

The phrase seemed to get a combination of anguish and dark humor last year and seemed to have caught on. Citizens then generally seem to have less expectation. Not so much an economical fall as a sluggish decline in hope.

This is a significant change for those who were born in China during the 1980s and 1990s and who were raised there during its four years of rapid development. Jobs in technology and funding are harder to find, homes are falling in value, and wages are not rising.

However, “garbage time” is even making room for younger and middle-class Foreign to redefine victory and joy. A creation is reevaluating what is most important in a changing economic environment as fine jobs, luxury goods, and house ownership are now more difficult to obtain.

From Prada to “living lighting”

Many middle-class people in China were pursuing lofty goals ten years ago when they sent their kids abroad for education. Former president Deng Xiaoping when said,” Getting wealthy is glorious.

Some Taiwanese people totally embraced this notion. In a study of millennial consumption habits conducted in 2021, 7.6 million young Chinese spent an average of 71, 000 yuan ( US$ 10, 375 ) on luxury goods, accounting for 30 % of the global luxury market.

They now appear to be altering their course, putting that type of saving on maintain due to financial strain.

Get the “tang ping,” a growing trend that is causing more young people to reject hustle culture while embracing “living light.” Or the phrase “run xue” or “run idea,” which actually refers to the study of leaving China.

Young Chinese are getting married afterwards, also, with rising wedding expenses and changing attitudes toward traditional home values being the main causes.

Shopping practices appear to support these trends. In 2024, China’s largest used-goods owner Xianyu reached 181 million customers. Selling surpassed one trillion yuan, or ten times that of 2018. BYD, a Chinese automaker, then outsells expensive overseas companies.

More important than simply saving money is what this is about. Traditional Chinese culture values family status and career success, but job shortage and falling house prices challenge these outdated stereotypes.

Fresh Chinese are then questioning the worth of hard work in a program that may no longer reward it. They place more value on individual well-being over throwing position. If the pattern persists, it might lead to the development of a new perception of middle-class personality.

Vibrations strike the globe

The international effects of all of this are important. International businesses take notice when 500 million people alter their spending patterns.

Apple, a once-favorable manufacturer, has lost ground, while Huawei, a regional brand, gained. Li Ning, a local apparel manufacturer, is challenging Nike. Firms that had anticipated apparently endless Chinese development are now having to recalculate. Planning is made more difficult by this, along with other governmental and political complexity.

Both school and work are changing, also. Some individuals have criticized China’s rigorous education program, and its “996 work society” ( 9am to 9pm, six times a week ) is waning.

Nevertheless, China’s financial growth is sapping at a more steady rate. And the state faces significant challenges as a result of the world’s declining economic model.

China’s imports dropped at the start of this year because Donald Trump’s tax laws were looming in the background. Export increased significantly slower, but at a slower rate.

The remarkable growth of China was both the product and the beneficiary of its members of the middle class. Strong consumer confidence may be assumed because 40 % of them have seen their riches decline in recent years.

For the time being, it seems as though a new financial identity is emerging. Whether this is a long-term trend or just a proper adjustment. In any case, one thing is sure: all feels it when the country’s second-largest market changes how it spends.

Christian Yao is a mature teacher at Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington’s School of Management.

This content was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Study the article’s introduction.

Continue Reading

China military says it held live-fire drill in Taiwan Strait

1 minute ago
Stephen McDonell

China Correspondent

Koh Ewe

BBC News

EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock Two grey military ships sailing in a harbourEPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock

China’s military conducted a live-fire training in the Taiwan Strait to create attacks on vital ports and power facilities, it said on Wednesday.

The practice, codenamed” Strait Thunder”, is an increase of military training China held on Tuesday around Taiwan, the democratic area Beijing claims as its place.

Taiwan’s political department said on Tuesday that it” highly condemns” the “military threats”, which have become increasingly program amid souring cross-strait relationships.

The training come as China sharpened its speech against Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te, labelling him a “parasite” and” dissident”. Lai had earlier this month referred to China as a “foreign angry power”.

The drills were meant to be a” serious warning and powerful containment of ‘ Taiwan independence ‘ separatist forces”, said a statement from China’s People’s Liberation Army ( PLA ).

It even released a series of cartoons depicting Lai as a “parasite” that was “poisoning Taiwan area” and- along with an picture of Lai being grilled over a fire-” courting best destruction”.

Another video by the PLA, titled” Suppress spirits and overcome evils”, likened the government’s features to the wonderful power of the Monkey King, a magical Chinese character.

In recent days, the Chinese Communist Party newspaper People’s Daily published a series of op-eds denouncing Lai as a” troublemaker” and “warmonger”.

” Facts have fully proven that Lai Ching-te is a vicious war maker”, read one of the articles published on Wednesday. ” Subdue demons and vanquish evils, use force to stop war”.

While the trigger for this week’s drills were not spelled out, Chinese authorities and state media have referenced a slew of policies announced by Lai last month to counter influence and infiltration operations by Beijing- where Lai used the “foreign hostile force” term.

However, the timing of the exercises, coming weeks after Lai’s announcement, suggests that Chinese authorities wanted to wait for the conclusion of meetings between Chinese President Xi Jinping and international business leaders, along with the annual Boao business summit that wrapped up on 28 March.

They also come with the world’s attention turned elsewhere, as global markets brace for the Trump administration’s latest round of tariffs.

A picture of the main character from the Monkey King - a mythical Chinese warrior

In response to China’s latest military drills, the White House said on Tuesday that US President Donald Trump was “emphasising the importance of maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait”. On Wednesday, the US State Department reaffirmed its “enduring commitment” to Taiwan.

During his recent visit to Asia, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth also repeatedly criticised China’s aggression in the region and pledged to provide “robust, ready and credible deterrence”, including in the Taiwan Strait.

However, the PLA seems to be moving towards a situation where such exercises around Taiwan occur regularly rather than in response to any specific perceived provocation.

Some experts see the drills as a dress rehearsal for a possible real blockade in an attempt to overthrow the government in Taipei in the future.

In the words of the Chinese military this week, they serve as a practice run” close in on Taiwan from all directions”.

In addition, analysts believe that Beijing has been increasing the frequency and size of its military exercises as a way of trying to increase pressure on Taiwan’s population to eventually accept an annexation by China as inevitable.

This is despite the fact that opinion polls have routinely shown that the vast majority of Taiwanese people firmly oppose a takeover of their democratically governed island group by China’s Communist Party.

Taiwanese officials have warned that China may stage more military drills later this year, on dates like the anniversary of Lai taking office or Taiwan’s National Day in October.

However, in Taiwan, movements by the PLA can also provide an opportunity.

Each time China conducts such war games, Taiwan’s military chiefs have said that they can study the manoeuvres in order to better prepare their own forces for any real attack.

Continue Reading

NUS expands startup hub in Tokyo to propel deep tech innovation

  • Block71 Tokyo may foster development with three key collaborations
  • Aims to support businesses, experts &amp, individuals by connecting them with shareholders

NUS Organization, the enterprising arm of the National University of Singapore ( NUS), is expanding its presence in Japan with the release of its second Block71 company in Tokyo, following its initial location in Nagoya in November 2024.

In partnership with key Japan technology money, Kyoto University, and TIS Inc., NUS Enterprise aims to support businesses, experts, and students while connecting them with investors. These partnerships coincide with Japan’s attempts to promote the development of its business ecosystem.

Located at Takanawa Gateway Link Scholars ‘ gateway, Block71 Tokyo will support Southeast Asian technology-driven businesses grow in Japan, contributing to urban development in environmental sustainability, freedom and technology, and intelligent wellbeing. It will also give Chinese companies with tools to grow into Southeast Asia and above.

” Japan’s solid foundation in technology and study makes it an excellent environment for business growth. It ranks among the world’s top three places for trademark applications and invests over three percent of its GDP in R&amp, D, one of the highest internationally. This creates enormous possibility for innovation”, said doctor Tan Eng Chye, NUS leader, at the beginning of Block71 Tokyo.

” With Block71 Tokyo located in the government’s latest innovation gateway, we have a proper program to join companies and travel cross-border engagement. To intensify our impact, we are partnering with one of Japan’s major universities, a big corporation, and a leading venture capital firm, all sharing our vision to foster deep digital innovation and build a strong global ecosystem”, he added.

Building on the success of its globally recognised Block71 model, Block71 Tokyo will promote knowledge exchange, cross-border innovation, and new opportunities for startups entering the Japanese market. To deepen its impact, NUS has signed three key partnerships:

NUS-central Japan innovation capital collaboration: Under a memorandum of understanding signed by associate professor Tee and professor Kazuya Takeda, CJIC CEO, CJIC will invest up to five percent of its assets under management in NUS-affiliated deep tech startups. The fund aims to raise approximately US$ 33 million ( RM138 million ) by November 2025. A subsidiary of the Tokai National Higher Education and Research System, CJIC supports university startups focused on deep tech innovation. NUS and CJIC will also explore broader collaboration opportunities to help startups from both ecosystems expand into the Japanese and Southeast Asian markets.

NUS-Kyoto University collaboration: NUS is strengthening entrepreneurial support for deep tech startups through a partnership with Kyoto University, formalised by an MOU signed by professor Tan and Dr Nagahiro Minato, Kyoto University president. Kyoto University will send startups to join the NUS graduate research innovation programme and will be the first overseas university partner in a localised version of the programme. This initiative will empower Kyoto University’s graduate students, researchers, and alumni to transform research into impactful deep tech ventures.

&nbsp, Both universities will also offer exchange programmes, enabling Kyoto University students to intern at NUS GRIP startups, while NUS GRIP startups gain hands-on experience from Kyoto University innovation capital co., ltd, the university’s venture capital arm. This partnership enhances the flow of entrepreneurial talent and strengthens innovation ties between the two countries.

NUS-TIS Inc. collaboration: NUS is expanding its global entrepreneurship efforts through a partnership with TIS Inc., one of Japan’s leading IT companies, to build a globally connected startup ecosystem. This collaboration, formalised through a collaboration agreement signed by professor Tan and Yasushi Okamoto, TIS Inc. group president, launches the deep tech seed to A growth expansion programme ( Deep-SAGE ), a startup acceleration initiative to help seed-stage startups scale towards pre-series A and series A funding.

TIS Inc. will commit a total of US$ 5.6 million ( RM25 million ) to support Deep-SAGE over three years, funding three cohorts of up to 10 startups each. TIS Inc. plans to invest a minimum of US$ 367, 000 ( RM1.6 million ) each in at least two startups per cohort. Block71 will design and deliver the programme, providing structured support through virtual mentorship, workshops, and incubation opportunities at its offices across 11 cities, including Singapore, Silicon Valley, Saigon, and Suzhou.
 

Through these strategic collaborations, NUS reinforces its position as a leading startup university in the global innovation landscape, nurturing entrepreneurial mindsets and empowering the next generation of technology entrepreneurs.

Following the success of its second Japan immersion programme in Nagoya in 2024, where startups gained insights into Japan’s manufacturing powerhouse, Block71 Japan will launch the third edition in Tokyo in May 2025. The 2024 programme helped startups navigate Japan’s culturally distinct business landscape, build local partnerships, secure customers, and develop proof-of-concept projects.

The 2025 edition will focus on Takanawa Gateway City’s key themes: environmental sustainability, mobility and robotics, and smart health. Five Southeast Asian startups will have the opportunity to showcase their solutions at the upcoming Gateway Tech Takanawa event, a platform for corporations and startups to exchange innovative ideas and solutions. This immersive experience will further strengthen ties between Southeast Asia and Japan, equipping startups with the knowledge and networks needed to expand into new markets and drive innovation.

” As a sub-subsidiary of the Tokai National Higher Education and Research System, CJIC has a strong commitment to support university startups focused on deep tech innovation and enhance the central Japan economy. NUS and CJIC will also explore broader collaboration opportunities to help startups from both ecosystems expand into the Japanese and Southeast Asian markets”, said Dr Kazuya Takeda, CJIC CEO.

Meanwhile, Dr Nagahiro Minato, Kyoto University president, said:” NUS and Kyoto University have collaborated in basic research for some time, but with this MOU, we will build a new relationship in industry-academia collaboration”.

” Our collaboration with NUS under the Deep-SAGE programme demonstrates TIS Inc.’s unwavering belief in the power of innovation. With this investment, we are poised to accelerate the growth of deep tech startups worldwide. This initiative not only reinforces our commitment to global entrepreneurship but also sets the stage for a new era of technology-driven growth”, said Yasushi Okamoto, TIS Inc. group president.

Continue Reading

IN FOCUS: Silver, debut, ice and snow – can these ‘economies’ boost China’s domestic consumption?

DEBUT ECONOMY: NEW PRODUCTS, STORE LAUNCHES

New services, goods launches, the beginning of lineup stores- Foreign shoppers ‘ appetite for new things and trends powers what policymakers call the album business design. &nbsp,

” Its success can be tracked through the number of premier business openings, solution launches, business exhibitions and location innovations like the fall of Hangzhou’s ‘ Six Little Dragons'”, said Prof Wang, referring to a coalition of technical start-ups, including Deepseek whose AI robot roiled Silicon Valley companies earlier this year, that transformed the historic city into a creative innovation hub. &nbsp,

In December, a fresh business square opened to many suffer in Guangzhou as part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area ( GBA )- featuring more than 80 stores- premier, concept- spanning across luxury retail, excellent dining, and experienced offerings. &nbsp,

The Canton Tower Plaza achieved an occupancy rate of over 95 per cent by the end of last year, Project Manager Jiang Nan told local media earlier in March. &nbsp,

The plaza also drew 310, 000 visitors on opening day and over 800, 000 in the first three days, generating more than 12 million yuan in sales. Daily foot traffic typically ranges from 40, 000 to 60, 000 visitors, rising to 80, 000 to 100, 000 during holidays, and peaking at nearly 280, 000 on occasions like New Year’s Eve.

” In the consumer sector, it is actually supply that determines demand”, Wang said. &nbsp,” The debut economy ( model ) requires further enhancement of the supply-side innovation ecosystem, particularly in terms of financial support, venture capital, and patient capital” .&nbsp,

Shenzhen Tonghe Indoor Ecological Technology, an environmental and social-focused startup, is preparing to open its first physical office space in Shenzhen within the next two years. &nbsp, combining research and experiential functions to refine its smart ecosystem.

General manager Li Hechen says the company sees the debut economy model as a key catalyst driving China’s evolving retail landscape. ” It meets diverse consumer demands, unlocks new spending potential and ( has become ) a new driver of consumption growth”, Li told CNA. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

How China plans to bounce back from more Trump tariffs – Asia Times

China’s president Xi Jinping just held a meeting with 40 leaders of foreign firms, including BMW and AstraZeneca.

In contrast to Donald Trump’s language, Xi told the top-level managers that globalisation was never going away. Xi is attempting to boost international investment in China, which has dropped in the last few decades, and establish new connections that will compensate Trump’s levies on some Chinese products.

In the March 28 meet, Xi “vowed to boost business entry” and assured business leaders that “lines of conversation” between them and the Chinese government are available.

Xi is hoping to build on an anti-Trump jump and encourage firms to again Beijing as some evidence emerged that China’s economy was doing a much better than expected in first 2025.

Industrial production went up by 5.9 % in January and February. Credit growth, which measures the amount of loans banks give out, also appears to be picking up, suggesting that businesses might be growing in China.

Retail sales, which are a major economic marker indicating consumer spending, has risen by up to 4 % in January and February this year, compared to last year.

Beijing is also willing to create further stimulus packages to sustain China’s economic growth, which might lift consumer confidence further.

But this is hampered by a real estate crisis that began in 2021. What followed was an already high local government debt that was exacerbated by the property crisis, and high youth unemployment that has existed since 2023.

The big question then is what are the factors that could lead to a more buoyant outlook in China’s economic fortunes?

Policy resolve

According to a Bloomberg report, China has traditionally relied on cheap loans and subsidies to boost economic sectors in infrastructure, manufacturing, and the property market. However, those times are over.

The problem is China has produced more goods to sell than people are willing to buy. In the past, Beijing relied on the West to purchase its products, but with rising protectionism and looming tariffs stemming from a Donald Trump-led US, US consumption of Chinese goods is likely to fall.

And if another key market in the form of the EU were to take a cue from Trump’s economic playbook and impose more tariffs on China, then Chinese hope for sales in the west for economic growth may not materialise.

Beijing’s surest way of boosting sales is through domestic consumption. This isn’t easy as China’s domestic spending remains relatively low at 40 % of the country’s GDP, which is about 20 % lower than the global average. And if Beijing wants cautious consumers to spend amid a relatively weak economic outlook, it needs to do more to raise consumer confidence.

Although China did introduce a stimulus package in September 2024, it has resolved to do more. In an early March 2025 speech in the Chinese parliament, Chinese Premier Li Qiang promised a” special action plan” to vigorously raise domestic consumption for 2025.

Several weeks later Li reiterated in the China Development Forum that Beijing would roll out more stimulus packages when the need arose.

These assurances are likely to have helped improve market sentiment, and the fact that China’s GDP growth target was also set at an ambitious level of around 5 %, might signal Beijing’s confidence and resolve that the economy will improve.

China’s AI revolution

In the past, China was considered a copycat nation known for manufacturing shanzai, or fake and pirated products. This difficulty in innovating and reliance on the designs of others largely lay with an education system steeped in rote learning, and a top-down culture with a conformist approach.

This is why experts thought China would struggle when the US decided to introduce restrictions on Chinese access to semiconductor and AI technologies. However, despite these restrictions, China has managed to develop a highly capable AI model of its own in the form of DeepSeek, which was unveiled early this year, and immediately boosted China’s image as an innovator.

Unlike other AI models, DeepSeek was apparently made at a&nbsp, fraction&nbsp, of the cost of other traditional AI models such as ChatGPT and may have a&nbsp, more efficient&nbsp, coding scheme that allows for quicker problem-solving. This has prompted Donald Trump to coin DeepSeek’s development as a wake-up call for the US tech industry.

Many AI startups in China are now revamping their business models to compete with DeepSeek, following the widespread adoption of the latter’s technology. The AI revolution in China could potentially reduce costs and thereby boost efficiency in the financial sector.

Following Trump’s return to the Oval Office, investors across the globe have been trying to reduce their reliance on the US by looking for investment opportunities elsewhere. This isn’t entirely surprising given Trump’s knack for the unpredictable, and how new US tariffs have been applied to a host of US allies such as Mexico, Canada and the European Union.

While Trump is striking an increasingly protectionist tone, China is taking the opposite approach. Trump’s penchant for tariffs and disregard for the economic interest of US allies may mean Beijing might not need to do too much to attract more nations and businesses to consider turning towards Chinese markets.

Chee Meng Tan is assistant professor of business economics, University of Nottingham

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ puts Asia in its line of fire – Asia Times

As Donald Trump shocks stock markets from New York to Singapore with widening risks of new levies, officials in Washington might want to examine what really happened in Seoul.

Over the weekend, South Korea, China and Japan met for their first high-level financial speech in five times. The style: beefing up local business as Trump’s White House supersizes its tariffs program.

The countries ‘ industry officials pledged to” carefully cooperate for a complete and high-level” process to create a three-way free trade agreement centered on “regional and international trade”.

In other words, Trump’s dumping of fresh grenades at the international trading program– and the resulting chaos in markets– has officials in Seoul and Tokyo but spooked that they’re talking. Truly talking, despite historic enmities.

People in Tokyo, however, are turning to Beijing as they realize the US, when Japan’s most trusted partner, is no longer the alliance it thought. Seoul, also, which has had a very up-and-down partnership with China during the Xi Jinping time.

This trilateral work probably wouldn’t be happening if Trump stuck with Plan A: a “grand deal” trade deal with China that creates a ginormous Group of Two market and gives Trump the financial legacy he so eagerly craves.

The plunge in global shares ahead of Trump’s” Liberation Day” reciprocal tariffs announcement on April 2 is garnering attention of the kind that the Trump 1.0 presidency would not have liked. Something Trump really does care about is the stock market.

So far, Trump 2.0 has displayed a greater pain threshold with regard to falling equities. Hence his recent comments about there being a “period of transition” for his tariff regime to make America’s economy great again.

As Trump said last month:” There’ll be a little disturbance, but we’re OK with that”. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent argues the world’s biggest economy needs a “detox” to wean it off dependence on public spending.

Last month, Bessent said Washington’s reciprocal levies will target the “dirty 15” that maintain substantial and chronic trade barriers with the US. Though Bessent didn’t specify which 15, suffice to say China is among them.

Commerce Department data show that as of the end of 2024, the US has the highest goods deficits with China, the European Union, Mexico, Vietnam, Ireland, Germany, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Canada, India, Thailand, Italy, Switzerland, Malaysia, Indonesia, France, Austria and Sweden.

But the fallout for Asian markets more broadly will come into sharper relief on Trump’s” Liberation Day”. Given the mixed signals from Trump, and how often he’s changed his mind about who’s in the collateral damage zone and why, Asia can’t be sure if Trump will wake up on April 3 and say “never mind” or instead add even more tariffs.

It’s the not knowing that has Asia on a cliff’s edge. This extends to what strategy the Trump team might be employing this week, as opposed to next or the one after.

Trump’s mixed-signal tariffs on China are a case in point. Team Trump seemed to think the mere threat of taxes on Chinese goods, touted as high as 60 % on the 2024 campaign trail, would shock Xi’s Communist Party into submission.

And that Beijing would draw up an extensive list of preemptive concessions to make” Tariff Man” Trump happy. Instead, Xi’s team made it clear they were looking forward to seeing Trump’s concession list. Having called Trump’s bluff, the White House quickly pivoted to tariffs — now at 20 %.

Yet Team Xi has stood firm. No clear concessions, no efforts to compliment Trump or signal China might cave. This lack of fealty is putting China in harm’s way as Trump’s revenge machine turns its way.

The bigger question is whether China bears the brunt of Trump’s bruised ego. Rather than bowing to Trump’s provocations, leaders from Canada to Mexico to Denmark have pushed back. Greenland is clapping back at Trump World’s designs on the island. Officials in Panama are rolling their eyes.

Enter Vladimir Putin for the coup de grâce. A few weeks ago, Trump was certain he’d scored the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire that eluded Joe Biden. Now, Putin is proving right the geopolitical wags who warned that he’s playing Trump. Not to mention depriving Trump of the Nobel Peace Prize he craves.

Trump is now “pissed off” that Putin is dashing ceasefire hopes and is threatening 50 % tariffs on nations that buy Russian oil. But mostly, Trump is miffed Putin exposed his art-of-the-deal schtick to be more myth than reality.

As so many world leaders brush Trump off, might the bullseye on China become even bigger in the weeks ahead? The impulse could be to go even harder at showing China who’s the boss.

That would put Asia writ large in harm’s way. Since the 1980s, Trump, then a New York real estate mogul, has blamed the region for stealing US jobs and prosperity in the most sinister terms. Back then, Japan was at the center of Trumpian ire.

At&nbsp, the&nbsp, time, Trump the businessman was a regular on daytime talk shows complaining about how Japan had” systematically&nbsp, sucked&nbsp, the&nbsp, blood&nbsp, out of America –&nbsp, sucked&nbsp, the&nbsp, blood&nbsp, out! They have gotten away with murder. They have ended up winning&nbsp, the&nbsp, war”.

Today, China inhabits the bogeyman role. It’s more complicated, though, given Trump’s oft-articulated affection for Xi. On January 23, for example, Trump said,” I like President Xi very much. I’ve always liked him”. Trump added that he’s “always had a great relationship” with China’s strongest leader since Mao Zedong.

Yet Trump and Xi seem on a collision course as the former realizes the latter isn’t the junior partner he envisioned. This raises the odds Trump might supersize the revenge tour that Asia has been dreading all year, including levies of 60 % or more on Made in China goods.

Wall Street, too. Along with increased tariffs, investors are trying to factor in the global fallout from Trump’s spending cuts and the risk of a US recession. At the same time, there are concerns about a bubble in artificial intelligence stocks, seen in recent big declines in the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 benchmark.

One concern is that hundreds of billions of dollars flowing into data center infrastructure are outpacing the need for such facilities. That’s pulling the rug out from under shares in chipmaker&nbsp, Nvidia Corp&nbsp, and companies from Broadcom Inc to Microsoft Corp to Amazon.com&nbsp, to Alphabet Inc&nbsp, to Meta Platforms.

But the real fallout could be on the outlook for Asia’s$ 41 trillion economy, and how it reverberates back on America. Trump’s tariffs threaten to deal a generational blow to the region’s development.

” Asia-Pacific economies are bracing for details of wide-ranging US tariffs”, says Helen Besier, an economist at Moody’s Analytics. ” The Trump administration has investigated the country’s trade relationships and appears bent on hiking tariffs to neutralize any duties, policies or practices that it believes create an uneven playing field. Beyond the direct impact on targeted countries, the toll will multiply. Much of this region’s trade is about components that come together as finished products destined for the US”.

Though China is standing its ground versus Trump, 2025 is proving to be an increasingly challenging year.

This week brought news of a slight improvement in manufacturing activity, as evidenced by China’s official purchasing managers ‘ index. The Manufacturing PMI quickened to&nbsp, 50.5 in March, its best performance in 12 months.

Even so, notes Carlos&nbsp, Casanova, senior Asia economist at Union Bancaire Privee,” support measures remain essential to sustain recovery in the first half of 2025″.

This may include the People’s Bank of China easing monetary policy again. That’s particularly possible as deflation pressures continue to bedevil officials in Beijing.

Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics, says the PMI data suggest “infrastructure spending is ramping up again and that exports have so far remained resilient in the face of US tariffs”. Yet, he adds, China’s economy likely grew noticeably slower in the first three months of 2025 than the last three of 2024.

Xi and Premier Li Qiang have pledged to step up fiscal policy moves to achieve this year’s growth target of&nbsp, “around 5 %”. Thus far, the priorities have been on giant trade-in programs for consumer goods to boost household spending and increased debt issuance to support the beleaguered housing sector.

For 2025, Beijing upped its budget deficit to around 4 % of gross domestic product ( GDP ), up from 3 % last year. It’s a rare increase as Team Xi works to counter Trump’s tariffs.

” The budget does allow for fiscal support to be stepped up further over the coming months”, Evans-Pritchard says, though US tariffs” will start to weigh on exports before long”.

Higher US tariffs on Chinese exports are also expected to hit domestic manufacturers in the coming months.

” The manufacturing sector faces downside risk in the second quarter as the external demand weakens, driven by the tariffs and the economic slowdown in the US”, says economist Zhiwei Zhang, president of Pinpoint Asset Management. ” The big question is how much export growth will decline, and how quickly the fiscal spending will pick up to offset weaker exports”.

Fighting these downside risks is pivotal to Xi making good on his pledge to create more than 12 million new urban jobs in 2025. Trump’s trade war, though, is generating unprecedented headwinds everywhere, including the globe’s biggest stock bourses.

The fallout could see Asia’s consumers and investors pulling back in ways that crimp US growth, too. And three of Asia’s four biggest economies striking a grand bargain trade deal with Trump Nation nowhere in sight.

Follow William Pesek on X at&nbsp, @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Rash AI deregulation puts financial markets at high risk – Asia Times

As Canada moves toward stronger AI regulation with the proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act ( AIDA ), its southern neighbor appears to be taking the opposite approach.

AIDA, piece of Bill C-27, aims to establish a regulatory framework to strengthen AI transparency, accountability and monitoring in Canada, although some researchers have argued it doesn’t go far enough.

Nevertheless, United States President Donald Trump is pushing for AI restructuring. In January, Trump signed an executive order aimed at eliminating any perceived regulatory impediments to” American AI development”. The executive order replaced past president Joe Biden’s due executive order on AI.

Importantly, the US was also one of two countries — along with the UK — that didn’t signal a worldwide declaration in February to ensure AI is “open, inclusive, open, honest, safe, protected and trustworthy”.

Eliminating Artificial protection leaves economic institutions vulnerable. This risk can improve confusion and, in a worst-case situation, increase the risk of widespread decline.

The power of AI in economic areas

AI’s ability in financial areas is obvious. It can increase administrative efficiency, perform real-time risk assessments, generate higher earnings and forecast forecast financial change.

My research has found that AI-driven machine learning models hardly only beat standard techniques in identifying financial statement scams, but also in detecting abnormalities quickly and effectively. In other words, AI does find evidence of economic mismanagement before they spiral into a crisis.

In another investigation, my co-researcher and I found that AI models like artificial neural networks and classification and regression trees may identify economic distress with amazing accuracy.

Artificial neural networks are brain-inspired algorithms. Similar to how our brain sends messages through neurons to perform actions, these neural networks process information through layers of interconnected “artificial neurons”, learning patterns from data to make predictions.

Similarly, classification and regression trees are decision-making models that divide data into branches based on important features to identify outcomes.

Our artificial neural networks models predicted financial distress among Toronto Stock Exchange-listed companies with a staggering 98 % accuracy. This suggests AI’s immense potential in providing early warning signals that could help avert financial downturns before they start.

However, while AI can simplify manual processes and lower financial risks, it can also introduce vulnerabilities that, if left unchecked, could pose significant threats to economic stability.

The risks of deregulation

Trump’s push for deregulation could result in Wall Street and other major financial institutions gaining significant power over AI-driven decision-making tools with little to no oversight.

When profit-driven AI models operate without the appropriate ethical boundaries, the consequences could be severe. Unchecked algorithms, especially in credit evaluation and trading, could worsen economic inequality and generate systematic financial risks that traditional regulatory frameworks cannot detect.

Algorithms trained on biased or incomplete data may reinforce discriminatory lending practices. In lending, for instance, biased AI algorithms can deny loans to marginalized groups, widening wealth and inequality gaps.

In addition, AI-powered trading bots, which are capable of executing rapid transactions, could trigger flash crashes in seconds, disrupting financial markets before regulators have time to respond.

The flash crash of 2010 is a prime example where high-frequency trading algorithms aggressively reacted to market signals causing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to drop by 998.5 points in a matter of minutes.

Furthermore, unregulated AI-driven risk models might overlook economic warning signals, resulting in substantial errors in monetary control and fiscal policy.

Striking a balance between innovation and safety depends on the ability for regulators and policymakers to reduce AI hazards. While considering the financial crisis of 2008, many risk models — earlier forms of AI — were wrong to anticipate a national housing market crash, which led regulators and financial institutions astray and exacerbated the crisis.

Blueprint for financial stability

My research underscores the importance of integrating machine learning methods within strong regulatory systems to improve financial oversight, fraud detection and prevention.

Durable and reasonable regulatory frameworks are required to turn AI from a potential disruptor into a stabilizing force. By implementing policies that prioritize transparency and accountability, policymakers can maximize the advantages of AI while lowering the risks associated with it.

A federally regulated AI oversight body in the US could serve as an arbitrator, just like Canada’s Digital Charter Implementation Act of 2022 proposes the establishment of an AI and Data Commissioner.

Operating with checks and balances inherent to democratic structures would ensure fairness in financial algorithms and stop biased lending policies and concealed market manipulation.

Financial institutions would be required to open the “black box” of AI-driven alternatives by mandating transparency through explainable AI standards — guidelines that are aimed at making AI systems ‘ outputs more understandable and transparent to humans.

Machine learning’s predictive capabilities could help regulators identify financial crises in real time using early warning signs — similar to the model developed by my co-researcher and me in our study.

However, this vision doesn’t end at national borders. Globally, the International Monetary Fund and the Financial Stability Board could establish AI ethical standards to curb cross-border financial misconduct.

Crisis prevention or catalyst?

Will AI still be the key to foresee and stop the next economic crisis, or will the lack of regulatory oversight cause a financial disaster? As financial institutions continue to adopt AI-driven models, the absence of strong regulatory guardrails raises pressing concerns.

Without proper safeguards in place, AI is not just a tool for economic prediction — it could become an unpredictable force capable of accelerating the next financial crisis.

The stakes are high. Policymakers must act swiftly to regulate the increasing impact of AI before deregulation opens the path for an economic disaster.

Without decisive action, the rapid adoption of AI in finance could outpace regulatory efforts, leaving economies vulnerable to unforeseen risks and potentially setting the stage for another global financial crisis.

Sana Ramzan is assistant professor in Business, University Canada West

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading