India: Is the world’s fastest-growing big economy losing steam?

Getty Images India factory workerGetty Images

Is the country’s fastest-growing large business losing heat?

The most recent GDP figures paint a depressing image. Between July and September, India’s economy slumped to a seven-quarter low of 5.4 %, well below the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) forecast of 7 %.

While it is still strong compared with designed nations, the determine signals a slowdown.

Economics attribute this to a number of elements. Government spending has decreased, private investment has been slow for centuries, and consumer demand has decreased. India’s goods exports have long struggled, with their share sitting at a mere 2 % in 2023.

Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) companies report tepid sales, while salary bills at publicly traded firms, a proxy for urban wages, shrank last quarter. Even the previously bullish RBI has revised its growth forecast to 6.6% for the financial year 2024-2025.

” All heaven seems to have broken free after the latest GDP quantities”, says analyst Rajeshwari Sengupta. However, this has been growing steadily for some time. There’s a distinct downturn and a major demand problem”.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman paints a brighter picture. She said last week that the decline was “not systemic” but a result of reducing government spending during an election-focused quarter. She expected third-quarter growth to offset the recent decline. India will probably remain the fastest-growing major economy despite challenges like stagnant wages affecting domestic consumption, slowing global demand and climate disruptions in agriculture, Sitharaman said.

Getty Images A shop is selling vegetables at a marketplace in Kolkata, India, on July 10, 2024. Prices of tomatoes, onions, and potatoes - staples in every Indian kitchen - are surging by double digits as extreme heat and heavy floods in northern states are disrupting agricultural production, according to reportsGetty Images

Some – including a senior minister in the federal government, economists and a former member of RBI’s monetary policy group – argue that the central bank’s focus on curbing inflation has led to excessively restrictive interest rates, potentially stifling growth.

Higher prices could reduce purchases and lessen consumption, both important factors in the growth of the economy, and create borrowing more expensive for businesses and consumers. Interest rates have remained constant for almost two years thanks largely to rising prices.

India’s inflation surged to 6.2% in October, breaching the central bank’s target ceiling (4%) and reaching a 14-month high, according to official data. It was mainly driven by food prices, comprising half of the consumer price basket – vegetable prices, for example, rose to more than 40% in October. There are also growing signs that food price hikes are now influencing other everyday costs, or core inflation.

However, high interest rates by themselves may never fully account for the sluggish growth. ” Lowering costs won’t stimulate growth unless use demand is strong. Investors use and spend only when demand exists, and that’s not the case today”, says Himanshu ( he uses just one name ), a development analyst at Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University.

But, RBI’s outgoing government, Shaktikanta Das, believes India’s “growth history remains intact”, adding the “balance between inflation and growth is also poised”.

Economists point out that despite record-high retail credit and rising unsecured loans – indicating people borrowing to finance consumption even amidst high rates – urban demand is weakening. Rural demand is a brighter spot, benefiting from a good monsoon and higher food prices.

AFP Pedestrians walk past the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) signage outside its headquarters ahead of the monetary policy press conference in Mumbai on December 6, 2024AFP

Ms Sengupta, an associate professor at Mumbai-based Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, told the BBC that the ongoing problems was borne out by the notion that India’s business was operating on a” two-speed trajectory”, driven by diverging appearances in its “old market and new business”.

The old business comprising the huge informal industry, including medium and smaller scale industries, agriculture and traditional business sector, are still waiting for long-pending reforms.

In contrast, the new economy, defined by the boom in services exports post-Covid, experienced robust growth in 2022-23. Outsourcing 2.0 has been a key driver, with India emerging as the world’s largest hub for global capability centres ( GCCs ), which do high-end offshore services work.

According to Deloitte, a consulting firm, over 50% of the world’s GCCs are now based in India. These centres focus on R&D, engineering design and consulting services, generating $46bn (£36bn) in revenue and employing up to 2 million highly skilled workers.

” This influx of GCCs fueled urban consumption by boosting the demand for SUVs, real estate, and luxury goods. For 2-2.5 years post-pandemic, this drove a surge in urban spending. With GCCs largely established and consumption patterns shifting, the urban spending lift is fading”, says Ms Sengupta.

Thus, while the new economy is sluggish, the old economy appears to lack a growth catalyst. Private investment is crucial, but without strong consumption demand, firms will not invest. Consumption demand cannot recover without investments to create jobs and increase incomes. ” It’s a vicious cycle”, says Ms Sengupta.

There are other confusing signals as well. India’s average tariffs have risen from 5% in 2013-14 to 17% now, higher than Asian peers trading with the US. In a world of global value chains, where exporters rely on imports from multiple countries, high tariffs make goods more expensive for companies to trade, making it harder for them to compete in global markets.

Getty Images The production line at the Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt. manufacturing plant in Chennai, India, on Wednesday, March 27, 2024.Getty Images

Then there is what economist Arvind Subramanian refers to as a “new twist in the tale.”

Even as calls grow to lower interest rates and boost liquidity, the central bank is propping up a falling rupee by selling dollars, which tightens liquidity. Since October, the RBI has spent $50bn from its forex reserves to shield the rupee.

Buyers are required to pay in rupees for purchases of dollars, which lessens the amount of market liquidity. Maintaining a strong rupee through policy changes makes Indian goods more expensive on global markets, which results in a lower export demand.

” Why is the rupee being stabilized by the central bank?” The policy has negative effects on both the economy and exports. Perhaps they are doing it because of optics. They don’t want to show India’s currency is weak”, Mr Subramanian, a former economic adviser to the government, told the BBC.

Critics warn that the “hyping up the narrative” of India as the fastest-growing economy is hindering essential reforms to boost investment, exports and job creation. ” We are still a poor country. Our per capita GDP is less than$ 3, 000, while the US is at$ 86, 000. If you say we are growing faster than them, it makes no sense at all”, says Ms. Sengupta.

In other words, India needs a significantly higher and more consistent growth rate to increase its workforce and increase its income.

Short-term goals for boosting growth and consumption won’t be easy. Lacking private investment, Himanshu suggests raising wages through government-run employment schemes to increase incomes and spur consumption. For example, Ms. Sengupta advocates for lowering tariffs and attracting export investments moving away from China to nations like Vietnam.

The government remains upbeat over the India story: banks are strong, forex reserves are robust, finances stable and extreme poverty has declined. Chief economic adviser V Anantha Nageswaran says the latest GDP figure should not be over-interpreted. “We should not throw the baby out with the bathwater, as the underlying growth story remains intact,” he said at a recent meeting.

Evidently, the rate of growth could use some improvement. That is why scepticism lingers. ” There’s no nation as ambitious for so long without taking]adequate ] steps to fulfill that ambition”, says Ms Sengupta. ” Meanwhile, the headlines talk of India’s age and decade- I’m waiting for that to materialise”.

Continue Reading

BNY hires Apac head of global markets trading, makes UAE appointment | FinanceAsia

Ashvin (Ash) Parkash has joined BNY on December 9 as head of global markets trading for Asia Pacific (Apac). 

The global bank has handed Parkash responsibility for accelerating its global markets trading services to clients across the Apac region, according to the a media release. 

Parkash (pictured) will continue to be based in Singapore and is joining BNY from Nomura, where he was responsible for electronic distribution across fixed income and FX. With 25 years of industry experience, in addition to Nomura, Parkash has held leadership roles at BNP Paribas, Citibank, and Lehman Brothers.

Parkash will report to Jason Vitale, BNY’s head of global markets trading, and Nelius De Groot, BNY’s head of markets international.

BNY is looking to grow its global markets trading business internationally and this latest move follows  the establishment of its EU trading desk, and the appointment of Bianca Gould as head of fixed income and equities for EMEA, earlier this year.

In the media release, Vitale commented: “A continues to present real opportunities for our business, as we see growing demand from our clients looking for differentiated execution services and high-quality solutions to streamline their operating model.”

Vitale added: “I’m thrilled to welcome Ash, whose track record in growing businesses and experience in product strategy make him an ideal fit as we deliver high-quality solutions for our clients across markets.”

UAE appointment

BNY has also appointed Madiha Sattar as managing director and Growth Ventures partner, in a newly created global role based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Sattar has joined the leadership team of BNY’s Growth Ventures business, which oversees new businesses that sit between technology, data, and investment solutions.

Last year, BNY invested in Abu Dhabi-based financial tech firm Alpheya, which is developing an end-to-end wealth management platform for wealth and asset managers in the Middle East.

As Growth Ventures partner, Sattar will play a strategic role working with clients in the region to build and invest in regional and global opportunities across financial markets data and analytics, wealth technology, and alternative assets data and distribution.

With over 20 years’ experience across operating and strategy roles, Sattar joins BNY from Careem, a MENA super app sold to Uber in 2019 for $3.1 billion, where she built and led several new businesses. Prior to that, Sattar spent time at JP Morgan Chase and McKinsey in New York.

BNY has been operating in the UAE for over 26 years and was recently granted a category 4 license by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority to expand its offering to clients within the Abu Dhabi Global Market. 

Akash Shah, chief growth officer and global head of growth ventures at BNY, said, “We are excited to welcome Madiha, who brings deep experience to the business and will play a strategic role as we accelerate the GCC’s ambitions to become a global centre of technology and financial services.”

For more FinanceAsia people moves click here


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Vietnam shows resilience, benefits from ‘China +1’ | FinanceAsia

In 2024, Vietnam’s main indices returned nearly 10 %, thanks to corporate reforms and a strong economic backdrop, which have resulted in a rise in risk appetite for the asset class. Despite disruptions caused by powerful Typhoon Yagi in September, the economy expanded by 7.4 % during Q3 2024, exceeding government estimates, which forecast growth between 6.8 % and 7 % for the year.

The financial performance highlights underlying endurance as well as a healing from weather-related setbacks. Q3 trade turnover increased by 19 %, while foreign direct investment ( FDI) reached$ 17 billion, according to Hung Nguyen, senior economist at Dragon Capital, Vietnam’s largest fund manager.

” The market is shifting cogs and grabbing global interest”, Nguyen said. As industrialization continues to strengthen the country’s producing capabilities, tech giants are expanding their footprint. In addition to the charge advantages, Vietnam is also the main receiver of multinational companies adopting” China 1″ strategies, where US businesses are diversifying their production reliance beyond a second nation.

The Chinese-Vietnamese purchase transition has taken place without compromising Beijing and Hanoi’s diplomatic relations. Vietnam continues to be its largest trading partner and major importer of goods. In the first three quarters, bilateral trade increased by 21 % in comparison to the same period last year, reaching$ 148 billion.

Vietnam is attracting powerful producers who need highly skilled workers to expand their existence, helping the nation proceed up the production value chain. This attracts both fundamental industries and powerful producers.

The introduction of new tax-subvention methods, such as the New Digital Industry Law, will provide a financial and administrative platform to encourage large-scale jobs in semiconductor and data centers, according to the New Digital Industry Law, which is scheduled to be passed in June 2025. Without a comprehensive national framework, most investment cases are handled on a case-by-case basis, which is less efficient, Nguyen explained to FinanceAsia.

Cautious approach remains

Hanoi’s success comes at a time when Washington and Beijing’s relations are at a sour. Through the use of a bamboo diplomacy strategy, a term that emphasizes a flexible foreign policy that embodies the characteristics of the indigenous plant that can bend in multiple directions without breaking, Vietnam is navigating through geopolitical difficulties that other countries have also encountered.

Vietnam has managed to position itself as a trustworthy partner to the economic rivals, according to Ismael Pili, head of institutional sales at Ho Chi Minh Securities Corporation, in a conversation with FA.

Despite the investment lags and stable relationships with the world’s two largest economies, Pili claims that fund managers are cautious as questions surrounding trade tariffs and their effects loom over the region. Vietnam is a victim of its own success, he explains, because it presents itself as an alternative hub to China and draws unwanted attention to its current account surplus with the US.

The criticism that Vietnam is transhipping goods in order to avoid tariffs on Chinese products, with nearly finished items imported solely to be shipped outside of the nation to avoid a” Made in China” label, is one of the unintended consequences.

According to Dragon Capital’s Nguyen, Hanoi is developing a systematic framework to better monitor these accusations. Additionally, Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade and the US Department of Commerce are working closely together to expedite the signing of a rule of origin agreement.

Investment implications

Trade tariffs anywhere could prevent new capital from entering the region because of the integration of Asia’s supply chains. With Trump’s re-election, his administration may favor a transactional strategy to achieve early victories, using tariffs or other economic tools to advance US interests, Nguyen said, adding that the Trump administration may even enshrine its restrictions even more.

Those concerns are not without precedent. During his first term in office, president Trump classified Vietnam as a currency manipulator, a mostly symbolic designation. Plans to accuse other Asian exporters of devaluing their currencies unfairly could indicate the administration’s priorities in the search for trade agreements as early winners.

In light of these uncertainty, the burden of making incremental investments shifts to Hanoi’s corporate reforms and market developments to attract foreign capital. Vietnam, which has been ranked as a FTSE Frontier market since 2018, hopes to be reclassified as an emerging market at some point in 2025, which would improve market liquidity by passive funds monitoring the global benchmark.

Although passive funds are good for the market, investors are still looking for potential future earnings, which could be hampered by increased demand for skilled labor and unreliable power supplies, according to Ho Chi Minh Securities ‘ Pili.

Elevated household savings rates reflect the current reluctance to spend, while the legacy of the anti-corruption campaign is also making corporations even more risk-averse, even&nbsp.

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Trump’s BRICS ultimatum won’t deter de-dollarization – Asia Times

The US President-elect is undoubtedly concerned about what the BRICS countries might have in business for the US dollar as Donald Trump prepares for a second term in the White House.

And, not surprisingly, Trump is threatening big-time fines for any hint of de-dollarization among Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and the grouping’s novel people, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Trump recently posted to his Truth Social system, saying that the notion that the BRICS countries are trying to walk away from the money while we watch and watch is over.

We demand a commitment from these nations that they won’t create a new BRICS money, nor will they support any other money to replace the powerful US money, or that they will be subject to 100 % tariffs, and that they should anticipate saying goodbye to selling into the wonderful US market.

Never simply a delightful bed from the Trump 2.0 group. Trump’s affected tariffs on the BRICS may only serve as fuel for the” International South” to look for or develop a buck alternative.

According to Michael Wan, senior currency analyst at MUFG Research, it’s unclear how 100 % tariffs on a group of nations that make up 37 % of global GDP would actually occur.

Additionally, it’s unclear how the BRICS’ sky-high taxes would benefit the world’s largest economy. But as Deutsche Bank argues, Trump’s preoccupation with a powerful money appears greater than ever.

” This seems to further show that money strength is an concern for the new leadership, unlike Trump 1.0″, when the US took a less ambitious approach, Deutsche researchers wrote.

Development countries have plenty of reason to be concerned about the dollars with US government debt exceeding US$ 36 trillion and Trump countering enormous budget-busting tax cuts. Washington, after all, only has one AAA record score left — from Moody’s Investors Service.

Morgan Stanley, for one, is advising that it might be time to sell the dollars. According to scientist David Adams,” a lot of the great news for the USD” has already been priced, with the majority of them having “largely internalized the US outperformance storyline” based on Trump’s pledges to impose their tax and trade policies. Businesses, though, may become “overestimating the rate, depth and scale” of those swings.

” We sense investment attitude on the whole is very productive on the franc, suggesting asymmetrical risks for a’ problems trade,’ in the months ahead”, Adams noted.

Trump World has made it clear the US Federal Reserve’s democracy, a key component in global confidence in the greenback, is also on the board come January. The” Project 2025″ system that his Democratic party cooked up for Trump 2.0 includes treatments for curbing the Fed’s much-vaunted freedom.

The Fed almost escaped Trump 1.0 unhurt. Trump placed the pressure on his hand-picked Fed Chairman Jerome Powell first and frequently during his first term in office, which spanned from 2017 to 2021.

Trump attacked the Powell-led Fed in statements, press events and on social media. Trump also mulled firing Powell. The Fed started adding liquidity to an business that didn’t have any additional assistance in the same year.

In October, Trump mocked Powell’s policy staff over. ” I think it’s the greatest job in government”, Trump told Bloomberg. Everyone talks about you like a god when you say, “let’s say turn a gold,” and you show up to the office once a month.

But&nbsp, Trump&nbsp, even defends the right of the leader to persuade the Fed into lowering costs. In August, Trump said,” the Federal Reserve&nbsp, is a very fascinating thing and it’s sort of gotten it wrong a bunch”.

Trump added,” I feel the leader should have at least stayed there, yeah. I feel that clearly. I think that, in my situation, I made a lot of money. I was extremely prosperous. And I believe I have a better impulse than those who, in many cases, may become chairman of the Federal Reserve.

For Asian officials and politicians, it’s a truly personalized abuse on the Fed’s position. The largest US Treasury supplies ever held by Eastern central bankers are held by the world’s largest central banks. Japan only holds$ 1.1 trillion&nbsp, of US loan, China$ 770-plus billion.

More broadly, Asia’s largest holders of dollars are sitting on about$ 3 trillion worth. It all implies that a Trump 2.0 administration would put a lot of Asian state success in danger.

Actually so, Trump is trying to wrench up tariff-induced problems for any country — or economic bloc — brave to champion a penny alternative.

The coming Treasury Department, however, was apply currency manipulation charges, trade controls or levies on trade beyond anything Trump has previously suggested or announced.

Trump appears to be prepared to punish allies who look to conduct bilateral trade in currencies other than the dollar, as well as adversaries. In March, Trump told CNBC that he “would not allow countries to go off the dollar”, as it would be” a hit to our country”.

Yet de-dollarization has moved to the center of the BRICS agenda, particularly since the grouping’s 2023 summit. Both Trump’s and US President Joe Biden’s fingerprints are present in this backlash.

Trump’s meddling with the Fed, hints at defaulting on US debt, and fiscal excesses affected dollar perceptions significantly. When Fitch Ratings revoked Washington’s AAA status, it&nbsp, cited the Capitol Hill chaos on&nbsp, January&nbsp, 6, 2021, as a “reflection of the deterioration in governance” imperiling US finances.

Biden-led efforts to impose economic sanctions on Russia, including accusations of “weaponizing” the dollar, exacerbated the problem.

” The United States ‘ ability to hobble Russia to this extent, without firing a shot, highlights the sovereignty of the United States and the dollar in the global economy”, argues George Pearkes, an analyst at the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center.

” In this case”, Pearkes noted,” sovereignty is the degree to which a currency issuer can dictate the use of that currency”. But, he added,” by using the power of dollar sovereignty, dollar sovereignty risks endangering the reserve status, which allows it to be weaponized”.

To be sure, Pearkes noted that “aggressive use of dollar weaponization has been signaled repeatedly by US policymakers to achieve US goals in the current Ukraine dispute.”

Although this would have a significant impact on Russia, he noted that “negative feedback on dollar sovereignty will be measured in decades rather than years— and will unavoidably come.”

According to Pearkes,” the ability to restrict access to financial markets is significantly more powerful than it has historically been.” What’s more, he noted,” the weaponized dollar” was “already a fact of life in global affairs” before Russia invaded Ukraine.

Pearkes noted that” the governments of Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Venezuela can all attest to that fact, as can their civilian populations. In all four countries, dollar sovereignty has been weaponized in a contemporary context”.

Trump is, however, steadfast in his desire to avoid the risk that the Global South might lose the dollar. &nbsp,

There is no way the BRICS will ever replace the US dollar in global trade, and any nation trying should wave goodbye to America, Trump said via social media.

Trump has recently shook markets with plans to impose 25 % tariffs on Canada and Mexico as well as additional levies on China up and above the 60 % he has already threatened.

Curiously, Trump said he’s had contact with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in recent days. Over the weekend, Trump told NBC that “we’ve had communication”.

At the Group of 20 summit in Japan in June 2019, Trump and Xi had their final in-person meeting. Trump stated to NBC,” I had an agreement with President Xi, who I got along with very well.

Still, Trump World is clearly steeling for a Trade War 2.0 with Xi’s Communist Party. Last week, Trump buttressed his” Tariff Man” street cred by naming uber-China hawk Peter Navarro as his top trade adviser. Navarro, &nbsp, who in 2011 co-authored a book titled” Death by China”, rarely misses a chance to accuse Xi’s party of “robbing us blind”.

Trump also appointed aggressive China critic Marco Rubio as secretary of state, and padded his next trade negotiations team with extremists like Jamieson Greer and Robert Lighthizer.

Trump 2.0’s supporters contend that tariffs are merely a tactic used to bring Xi’s party to consensus. Yet Xi’s inner circle seems unsure of Trump’s sincerity concerning a new “grand bargain” trade deal.

Case in point: Beijing’s move to limit the sales of key components used to build drones to the US and Europe. While bad news for Ukraine’s defense against Russia, it also serves as a sign of upcoming broader export restrictions.

China also opened an investigation into US chipmaker Nvidia this week following concerns that the business might have violated its anti-monopoly laws. This is also being interpreted as a sign of targeted Chinese trade war retaliation measures. Nvidia is at the center of Nvidia’s efforts to rule the artificial intelligence market.

Earlier this year, the BRICS added Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE to its ranks.

Mariel Ferragamo, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, said,” The addition of Egypt and Ethiopia will amplify voices from the African continent.” Egypt also shared close political ties with Russia and close business ties with China and India. As a new BRICS member, Egypt seeks to&nbsp, attract more investment&nbsp, and improve its battered economy”.

According to Ferragamo,” the addition of Saudi Arabia and the UAE would bring in the Arab world’s two biggest economies, as well as the second and eighth top oil producers globally.”

Yet the most powerful connector among BRICS members, old and new, is stepping out of Washington’s financial orbit. As such,” we think the bloc&nbsp, has &nbsp, the most potential to forward its de-dollarization agenda in&nbsp, FX reserves and fuel trade”, said Chris Turner, global markets head at ING Bank.

Turner noted that the BRICS bloc controls 42 % of global central bank currency reserves, likely contributing to the global de-dollarization process.

The BRICS is “gaining more and more visibility as a trade partner for other emerging markets, particularly in the fuel trade,” adding that it is “gaining more and more ground in regional trade.” BRICS accounts for 37 % of the EM fuel trade, a key area of interest for de-dollarization”, he said.

The BRICS , Turner noted, “is actively de-dollarizing its financial flows from above-average levels, as seen through declining shares of US dollar in their cross-border bank claims, international debt securities, and broader external debt”.

The BRICS , according to Turner, “has a much smaller global presence in those areas that limits the impact of its regional de-dollarization on the global role of the US dollar.”

Even so, the BRICS are causing the dollar to pivot, despite Trump’s efforts to stifle the process. Perhaps the better course of action would be to improve the US financial system.

But that seems unlikely as Trump eyes additional multi-trillion-dollar tax cuts sure to push America’s national debt toward an eye-watering$ 40 trillion over the next four years.

Trump may also be using the reserve currency to defy de-dollarization advocates. With the BRICS cast playing the role of a spoiler, the dollar will likely be a major battleline in the Trump 2.0 era.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Perdue as Beijing envoy will boost US-China investor confidence – Asia Times

The appointment of former US Senator David Perdue as adviser to Beijing by Donald Trump demonstrates a rational strategy to US-China relationships that will likely be welcomed by foreign buyers. &nbsp,

Perdue brings a business-savvy view to the political field at a time when US-China connections are becoming more significant in international markets as a previous CEO with extensive expertise in Asia. &nbsp,

Perdue’s appointment could help guide diplomatic discussions toward more financially beneficial outcomes, bringing in more profit for global investors, as the two financial superpowers are at their peak.

The US-China financial marriage has been a key area of global investment strategies, and Perdue’s knowledge provides him with a unique perspective on this crucial area. &nbsp,

Perdue has strong associations and an understanding of the political and business details of the Asian market. He is a former Fortune 500 main professional and a US senator who has lived in Hong Kong and Singapore. &nbsp,

For traders, this relationship may be seen as a good step in the direction of creating a more stable and successful partnership between the US and China, as well as providing new funding opportunities and strategies in Asia.

Perdue’s focus on business and economic discussions sets him apart from other political appointments. &nbsp,

Perdue’s experience as a business leader favors an economic-focused approach, in contrast to the more traditional foreign policy technique used in other senior positions like Mike Waltz and Marco Rubio for Secretary of State. &nbsp,

This could be of specific attention to investors, as business-driven politics offers more consistency and less uncertainty, especially when it comes to business agreements and economic partnerships.

For buyers in industries that are heavily intertwined with US-China business, Perdue’s visit offers possible balance. &nbsp,

The original president’s expertise may aid in trade negotiations, making it easier for businesses with business interests to have a more predictable environment in China. &nbsp,

As businesses continue to look for answers regarding taxes, trade barriers, and the future of the global supply chain, his proper authority may be important in navigating these gentle trade associations between the US and China.

Trump’s presidency has historically had a strong grip against Chinese trade practices, but Perdue’s visit may point to a move toward preserving US economic passions while continuing to cooperate with China. &nbsp,

This method is likely to result in a more healthy bargaining strategy that benefits both economies. This results in a reduction in political confusion and possible avenues for the US and China to work together rather than compete.

Perdue’s visit also coincides with the expanding trend of using business experience in senior political positions. &nbsp,

As world trade expands, and cross-border financial connections become more sophisticated, standard politics may no longer be much to address the needs of modern economy. &nbsp,

His background in business gives him the tools to influence China on a stage where he is less concerned with ideological differences and more focused on finding alternatives for trade and investment.

Traders who have experienced a hard atmosphere in the midst of tariffs and trade restrictions are likely to find the shift to a more business-focused political approach comforting. Perdue’s experience navigating difficult international markets suggests that he can cultivate stronger business relationships, lessen the risk of unexpected policy changes, and make the environment for investment more conducive. &nbsp,

Strengthening ties with Washington may be essential to sustaining worldwide business growth, especially with China, which is the second-largest economy in the world.

Also, Perdue’s deep knowledge of the Chinese industry and company culture offers investors a distinct advantage. &nbsp,

Businesses and financial institutions that are actively involved in Asia will gain from having one in a key political position who is skilled in moving economic deals ahead. Traders in sectors such as systems, banking, and manufacturing — industries that rely heavily on US-China relations — are likely to see this visit as a positive growth for long-term security.

While Perdue’s visit highlights a more realistic view of US-China relationships, it also highlights a wider pattern of financial politics that may influence international investment strategies in the future. &nbsp,

As political tensions continue to rise, buyers will look for signs that global economic ties are moving towards joint, rather than aggressive, options. Perdue’s visit, so, offers hope that the US can sustain a productive working relationship with China, keeping markets firm and ensuring that global trade continues to flourish.

Perdue’s appointment as Beijing’s ambassador is seen as a potentially crucial moment for international investors, especially those who have exposure to the US and Chinese markets. Perdue has the opportunity to shape US-China relations in ways that benefit investors and guarantee the continued expansion of the global economy by balancing economic and diplomatic interests.

Nigel Green is the deVere Group’s CEO and founder.

Continue Reading

South Korea: Yoon’s martial law declaration no bolt from the blue – Asia Times

One practically understands North Korean President&nbsp, Yoon Sook-yeol’s stress. The communist opposition in&nbsp, South Korea, the Democrat Party, holds a commanding majority in the National Assembly. They have been attempting to hinder and undermine him since day one.

Since he took office in May 2022, they have tried to oust him 22 days and had blocked his plans at every turn. His wife is being targeted for corruption charges as well as his major representatives are being impeached.

So much for” the faithful criticism”. This seems also beyond sharp-elbowed politicians. Yoon described it as a “legislative dictatorship“.

But Yoon’s declaration of martial law on December 4 was a” shot, available, purpose” sort of thing. It did not appear to be based on any specific information about an imminent threat that may warrant or elicit public assistance for such a radical shift in a well-established politics.

The consequences

According to some reports, Yoon was encouraged by the defence minister and perhaps the Army’s nose to declare martial law as the best way to defeat the criticism that had made South Korea illegitimate. &nbsp,

But, Yoon’s own party’s officials came out against the move. No overwhelming public assistance existed, and even the military’s help sagged.

Yoon rescinded the order a few hours after declaring martial law. Yet, the damage was done. Besides the damage to North Korean civil society, it is a major headache for American when a vital ally in Northeast Asia is in such a bind.

The Chinese are completely unconcerned.

Individuals callng for the departure of South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, Seoul, December 4, 2024. Photo: ©Kyodo.

Yoon crying dog?

Here is something else to acquire: President Yoon in his speech announcing and justifying martial law warned of North Korea&nbsp, adherents in the opposition.

He is truly best. &nbsp, There is a significant part of South Korea’s Democrat Party and leftist social globe that is pro-North Korea&nbsp, and even pro-China&nbsp, – as painful as that is to imagine. They are also anti-American.

President&nbsp, Moon Jae In, Yoon’s predecessor, was preternaturally sympathetic to both North Korea and the People’s Republic of China ( PRC ). &nbsp,

Additionally, he was hostile toward the US. In his book, he tells of his joy on hearing the Americans were defeated in&nbsp, Vietnam.

The extreme National Assembly

Hard-core radicals were likewise employed by Moon in his management and in great positions. Imagine if extremists from the 1960s resurrected America. ( Some people claim that they have done it a few times in recent years, but that is another story. )

In South Korea the illiberal student extremists are from the 1980s – and are known as&nbsp, Jusapa. &nbsp,

Get Lee In-young, the Unification Minister appointed in July 2020. Read the&nbsp, transcript&nbsp, of his assurance hearing&nbsp, in the National Assembly. &nbsp,

Lee was biting his lips but did not seem to have changed significantly since his days as the&nbsp,# 2 people in the Anti-American Youth Association, which was the underwater organization providing command to Jeondaehyup. a harsh, dramatic 1980s student business, Jeondaehyup was based upon North Korea’s Juche philosophy. &nbsp,

Over the past four decades, the Democrat Party hasn’t changed. &nbsp,

Its current president, &nbsp, Lee Jae Myung, has called British forces in South Korea “occupying troops”. However, he is accommodating towards the PRC, including its location on bringing&nbsp, Taiwan&nbsp, under its hand.

Tara O of East Asia Research&nbsp, continues to perform superb work on this topic. Her analysis is essential for anyone interested in understanding the background, beliefs, and political goals of South Korea’s leftists.

Communist supremacy

Liberals in South Korea have long desired a one-party system in place of their own. They have aimed to rule over the government’s valves, including those held by media outlets, labor unions, and education. &nbsp,

However, this objective was achieved through Moon Jae In’s poll in 2017 and the succeeding National Assembly elections in 2020 and 2024. That is what gave the socialists complete control over the National Assembly. &nbsp,

Additionally, it is conceivable that the National Assembly is a more appealing goal than actually South Korea’s administration. &nbsp,

During a South Korean National Assembly plenary session in Seoul, on December 5, 2024, a report about the president’s prosecution movement was made. Photo: ©Yonhap / Kyodo.

The National Assembly can make a president’s living almost impossible in the North Korean program. Likewise, in the United States, a president has tremendous power even if the criticism holds both houses of Congress.

This author believes that there is reliable proof of common political exploitation in the 2020 and 2024 National Assembly votes. This deserves much more evaluation than it has so far.

Unfortunately, most South Korean people have no desire to be ruled by North Korea or a North Korean-like program. However, they also support the US-ROK empire. &nbsp, &nbsp,

But it doesn’t matter as much when a group of extreme radical, whether religious or not, can overtake a government and relocate a nation where the majority of people are opposed. &nbsp, We have seen it before.

The conclusion activity

Whatever happens, Yoon’s decision to declare martial law will forever discredit liberals in South Korea. South Korean liberals are typically pro-American, supporting American-style rights and pro-free areas. &nbsp,

This works to the Democratic Party’s benefits. It even roils the ROK-US empire – at a time when the PRC is on the walk along with its erstwhile supporters, North Korea and&nbsp, Russia.

On top of that, President Yoon’s foreign policy efforts perhaps be lost. Seoul has steadfastly bolstered its ties with Japan, and South Korea is providing US with weapons to remove its sending to, say, Ukraine. &nbsp, &nbsp,

With the political clout and standing that come with that, South Korea is a big supplier of weapons both in Asia and the world.

Who stands to gain from the “entropic war” that has been occurring in South Korea for at least the past seven years and that just happened to explode?

Anwer: The PRC. &nbsp,

One very thinks they encouraged it, given the PRC’s track record of employing stochastic war and political war from&nbsp, Washington&nbsp, to the Solomon Islands and over.

For over 70 years, the US-South Korea empire has performed admirably well. And it is able to fend off a North Korean invasion, at least for the moment.

Entropic war might, nevertheless, accomplish for the ally what dynamic warfare could not.

This disaster is one more the Trump Administration needs to deal with. As if it needed more.

RELATED:

Grant Newsham, a resigned US Marine captain, is the publisher of&nbsp, When China Attacks: A Warning to America.

This content was first published by JAPAN Forward. It is republished with authority.

Continue Reading

A Ukraine war deal that puts the energy squeeze on China – Asia Times

Donald Trump’s returning to the White House is causing a stir six months before his official announcement.

The President-elect’s receiving Russia-Ukraine minister, Keith Kellogg, his former intelligence chief, Richard Grenell and Vice President J D Vance are all proposing some variant of freezing the Line of Contact and blocking Ukraine from entering NATO, Reuters reported.

On the Russian area, Kyiv is suddenly signaling an attention in compromise. Volodymyr Zelensky, president, just made a hint to Sky News that he might take NATO membership and Russia’s ongoing possession of land that Ukraine recognizes as its own. This is a significant departure from his previous nihilist demand that Russia entirely leave Ukraine’s 1991 borders as a prerequisite for the resolution of the conflict.

The Wall Street Journal finally reported that his closest consultant, Andriy Yermak, met this week with members of Trump’s team, including Kellogg, Vance, and incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. Trump’s coming chief of staff, Susie Wiles, even presumably met with Zelensky.

Ukraine plans to declare its preparation for peace, according to a statement from the Wall Street Journal. According to Bloomberg‘s statement, “Ukraine’s allies have switched their efforts from pursuing a victory to trying to position President Volodymyr Zelensky to best counteract Russian advances or discuss a possible ceasefire.”

Russia continues to make vehement demands that Ukraine reaffirm its democratic neutrality, demilitarize, denounce, and acknowledge the new regional realities brought about by the referendum on September 2022 that saw four of its original areas vote to join Russia.

Russia also requests that all of its freezing assets be returned to Russia with the lifting of all punishment. Russia will probably have to reach a compromise on some or all of these issues, but it’s not known how flexibly Vladimir Putin may be.

At this year’s” Russia Calling”! purchase forum, Putin said, “despite the&nbsp, political pressure, some of&nbsp, our partners, including those from Western Europe and&nbsp, the&nbsp, United States, have never left the&nbsp, Russian market…I&nbsp, am positive that relations with our European partners will eventually adjust, mainly because it is in&nbsp, their interest and&nbsp, ours, of&nbsp, course, as&nbsp, well”.

This suggests the potential contribution that business can make to uniting Russia and the US. In the event that Nord Stream II is sued in a European bankruptcy court in the first half of the following year, The Wall Street Journal reported late last month that Miami funder Stephen Lynch, who has a history of operating in Russia, wants to buy it.

He has officially sought the US government’s authorization to do so. If the job is approved, it goes to bid, and Lynch makes the necessary agreements, putting an end to the biggest war in Europe since World War II.

The key might be power politics. Trump’s earlier concerns to Nord Stream II were that it wasn’t under British control and may cause Russia to exert unfavorable effects on US objectives.

If Lynch purchases the network, however, then the matter had evidently been resolved. The next intact pipeline that Putin mentioned at a press conference after the BRICS Summit in October could then be used to help Germany avoid its rumored impending recession.

For that to happen, nevertheless, some American restrictions would have to be lifted. Trump might be able to continue using the SWIFT payment method and let deals to be conducted in US dollars for convenience, which would help him combat de-dollarization policies that he warned about in a late last month social media post.

The added benefit is that preventing a crisis may also help the entire EU avoid one, helping to keep it on par with US exports.

The US can continue to sell comparatively less expensive Gas to Europe and maintain the market share it has seized from Russia during the past nearly three years of hostility toward Ukraine, but some discounted oil from Russia may be required to maintain economic security in difficult economic times.

Additionally, the proposed raising of some sanctions against Russia, even if only primarily for its oil exports to Germany via what might be the US-controlled Nord Stream II, may open the door to further lifting them.

After all three parties engage in various concessions to that end, the energy industry may be involved, at least at second, and could be phased as a reward for ratifying any peace, truce, or peace agreement the US supports brokering between Russia and Ukraine.

Trump 2.0 is anticipated to be very hawkish toward China, so it follows that it might want to halt Russian energy exports from the People’s Republic over time, which could be accomplished through more imaginative diplomacy.

Russia’s oil exports to India could be included in the initial lifting of some sanctions, which would allow for the organization to move some of its gas exports to Germany. These exports could also once again be done in dollars and via SWIFT for convenience.

Excluding China from these exemptions might lead to lower prices on Russian oil, which would increase the total cost of its oil purchases from other countries. The US might even allow some of its companies to invest in Russia’s Arctic LNG 2 project, which it earlier sanctioned.

The goal would be to reduce the amount of energy that its systemic rival can import from Russia in the future by replacing Chinese investments with American ones. If the right conditions are created, Russia’s LNG gas exports might instead help fuel the Japanese economy.

In spite of the sanctions, Japan is determined to keep its LNG imports from the nearby Sakhalin 2 project uninterrupted, which could set the stage for the redirection of other such exports in the future.

The recent injection of foreign currency, particularly dollars, into Russia might ease the strains it is currently experiencing in terms of macroeconomics, encouraging the Kremlin to abide by any agreement that is ultimately reached with Ukraine.

Additionally, it’s possible to exchange some of its frozen assets for stakes in these same energy projects or other assets. Additionally, they could be used to purchase Western technologies, which are essential to the energy sector of the country.

The US might try to persuade Russia to reject the basement-bargain prices that China is reportedly demanding in exchange for signing a deal on the Power of Siberia II gas pipeline, depending on how effective such creative energy diplomacy is.

The Power of Siberia II project might be shelved if more lucrative markets emerge after the US stops obstructing some Russian exports, such as if it permits Russia to construct southern-directed pipelines to Iran and/or India via Iran or, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

It is in the US’s top strategic interests to encourage Russia not to give China cheap energy. The strategy could foreseeably be advanced through creative energy diplomacy, which might start with Lynch’s plan to buy Nord Stream II and move on until Russia stops building any additional pipelines to China. The only way to get the Kremlin on board, however, is through creative compromises on Ukraine.

Russia needs some of its maximumist demands to be met, aside from the relief of sanctions. This might involve the US compulsion to force Ukraine to accept the new territorial realities brought on by the conflict, restrain some of its armed forces, and rescind laws that Russia deems to be discriminatory against ethnic Russians and Russian speakers by withholding weapons as retribution if Zelensky refuses.

As Trump 2.0 makes its transition to Asia, the US would pay these small sums of money for allowing Ukraine to pay for the US to force Russia to end the war.

Continue Reading

South Korea’s main parties hold emergency talks as impeachment vote looms

According to reports that MPs may propose a voting to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol over Tuesday night’s briefed martial law declaration, South Korea’s major events are holding emergency sessions.

The main opposition party t is cu r claims that the vote could take place as soon as it can guarantee that the motion’s passage is approved. It is currently scheduled for Saturday.

The chief of Yoon’s ruling party demanded his immediate expulsion on Friday, claiming that he posed a “great harm” if he remained in power, the first indication his own party could then ballot with the criticism.

To get the 200 votes needed for the prosecution movement to go, the opposition needs the backing of at least eight ruling group MPs.

Han Doong-hoon, chief of the People Power Party ( PPP ), had earlier said his party would not support the opposition’s impeachment motion.

But on Friday he said said there was” reliable information” that Yoon had ordered the arrest of important politicians on “anti-state fees” on Tuesday.

He expressed worry that “extreme steps”, such as the military law declaration, may be repeated if Yoon remained in business.

The Republic of Korea and its citizens are in excellent danger as a result of these, they say.

He added that his group was aware of ideas to detain opposition leaders in a detention facility in Gwacheon, a area north of Seoul.

His statements are the first sign that the president’s personal political party may support his impeachment.

Earlier on Friday, followers of the criticism assembled on the actions of congress, armed with banners and demanding the president’s treatment.

Yoon’s attempt to impose military law shocked the nation and inseduced South Korea’s friends and financial markets.

He cited risks from “anti-state makes” and North Korea. However, it quickly became clear that his decision had been motivated by his own private social problems rather than by external threats.

After 190 Members made it into the legislature and rejected it, the attempt was immediately changed, some of them climbing gates and breaking barricades to enter the chamber.

Legislators in the opposition are concerned about a further effort to enact martial law. Some of them previously told the BBC that they were staying close to the National Assembly’s basis so they could immediately reject any like charter.

However, ruling party MP Cho Kyung-tae became the first decision group MP to formally words support for Yoon’s prosecution.

Lawmakers are tasked with making the decision between standing up for the people and supporting the troops that imposed military law, Cho said on Friday.

” I hope that all the officials of the Women’s Power will stand on the side of the people”, he added.

The money, Seoul, has seen more than two weeks of street demonstrations demanding Yoon’s departure, while police said he is being investigated for “insurrection”.

Individuals have also been flooding PPP politicians with text messages, urging them to vote for Yoon’s impeachment, according to North Korean media reports.

One MP, Shin Sung-bum, received more than 4, 000 like messages on Facebook, The Chosun Daily reported.

A survey conducted by the native poll Realmeter on Thursday revealed that more than seven out of ten South Koreans supported the impeachment.

Before his attempt to bring the nation under military rule, Yoon had been plagued by small ratings for his acceptance, corruption allegations, and a government led by the opposition that had made him a lame-duck innovator.

Hosu Lee in Seoul and Fan Wang in Singapore both provided more investigating.

Continue Reading

Commentary: Capitalism is the unsung hero of South Korean democracy

It was almost expected that wealth may bring with it a rising middle class that became more ambitious and demanded a greater state in how it was governed as military-backed officials in Seoul promoted rapid industrialization in the years following the war that left the peninsula&nbsp divided. The attention that came with inclusion in supply stores, inbound and outbound funding, and the amount demanded for exposure to international markets forced South&nbsp, Korea to&nbsp, clean&nbsp, up its act.

Seoul&nbsp, which experienced a quarter-inch of definition during the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, is another example of surges. As heartbreaking as the panic was, it was also portion of a big&nbsp, change in the country’s politics.

For the first time, a long-standing&nbsp, opposition politician, Kim Dae-jung, was elected leader. Government statistics tried to murder him during the dictatorship times, but American intervention&nbsp, kept Kim dead. His time arrived, and the transition to full politics was full.

Troops ARE SET FORCE BY CAPITALISM AND AN OFFICIAL ECONOMY.

A former North Korean industry minister sat along with Bloomberg editors in Singapore on Wednesday as politicians debated the future of the nowadays disgraced Yoon.

I questioned him about whether the ebbs and flows of socialism were Korea’s epithets of politics from a historical perspective. ” Absolutely”, replied Yeo Han-koo, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. ” There’s no turning back” .&nbsp,

Continue Reading

Leftwing populists and far right teamed up to topple French PM – Asia Times

France’s shortest-lived state has fallen in a vote of no confidence triggered by a dispute over now-departing excellent secretary Michel Barnier’s resources.

The far-right Rassemblement National ( RN ) supported the vote in an act that Barnier described as a” conjunction of opposites,” led by the left-wing populists La France Insoumise.

The condition is burial, according to Barnier, and it will only get worse if the government is unstable and the institutions are dysfunctional. As President Emmanuel Macron moves to remove Barnier, all involved, from state to opposition, really consider how they arrived at this scenario.

The political parties of France’s officials ‘ persistent dynamic and majoritarian tendencies caused this issue. They should then take that France’s situation will only be improved by a change in this kind of tradition.

Following his group’s disappointing performance in the European Parliament elections, Macron immediately suspended the National Assembly and called for first parliamentary elections in June.

Competent parties devised a joint strategy to stop it, anticipating that the RN might have won a clear majority in the National Assembly based on its election results in the first round ( where it received 32 % of the vote ). They organized a “republican top,” which brought together center-right, centrist, and far-left legislators.

In the first and second rounds of voting, the alliance’s parties made an electoral pact that allowed one party to withdraw their applicants where it would allow another to avoid the RN from winning the desk.

This technique resulted in the RN narrowly missing being in office for the first time after years of steady help growth. Additionally, it deposed France of a lot and created three roughly equal social clusters in the legislature, each of which could not stand alone.

However, while Macron’s party was content to work with the others to stay the RN from taking office, these noble sentiments vanished when it came to power. Each party’s financial ideology was very various for them to come up with a common ground. Otherwise, the moderates created a minority government, a move that Macron’s moderates made possible by agreeing to abstain from voting in the government’s investiture in order to obstruct its course.

Brinkmanship

The RN, which had become the kingmaker due to the government’s budget approval, continued to exercise its strong dynamic instincts when it faced the current crisis.

To address a colossal public debt and correct a yawning deficit, Barnier’s budget to the parliament was difficult: €60 billion ($ 63.5 billion ) needed to be discovered. To the president’s breaks, it tried to spread the pain consistently ( though not likewise ) across the board through a mix of tax rises and spending cuts.

A compromise would need to be reached between the government and the RN in order for the budget to be passed. But here again, a strict majoritarian logic was at play.

The RN alleged that the government was being kept out of the open and that it wasn’t being heard. In that respect, the RN was correct. Barnier himself proclaimed to be open to conversation but not to bargaining.

The RN drew its red lines and issued its demands, focusing on the measures that would be most immediately felt by voters, knowing that the key to ratifying the budget was to be found. It wished to stop the reintroduction of electricity taxes and make a U-turn on the proposed reductions in medical prescription reimbursements. Additionally, it demanded that pension payments be immediately indexed.

The government conceded, first over the electricity prices, then over prescriptions, until Barnier finally decided that was enough. The government was unable to advance without halting its plans to restructure public spending and without losing face to blackmail.

And this is essentially what the entire exchange was about. The RN’s demands were also a form of repentance for the leftists and a rehashing of its earlier threats to lower the government.

Barnier has a thorough understanding of the game to which he was subjected, and is a seasoned politician. Therefore, he chose to make the vote about the “responsibility of the government” rather than the budget. In order to do this, he cited a constitutional provision that permits the government to pass laws without the approval of the parliamentary majority.

He did this because he knew the opposition parties ‘ only way to stop him would be to hold a confidence vote and to overthrow the government. The RN welcomed the motion, which was brought forward by the left-wing New Popular Front.

Why would Barnier’s plan to obliterate the government in this way? To re-engage the RN and make it confront the risks that its own behavior carries was a constant display of the competitive and majoritarian logic.

What happens next?

The RN now has to navigate the unknown waters that it has pushed the nation. The government has fallen, but fresh elections can’t take place until July. In the interim, a technocratic caretaker government will be in power, causing political stagnation in France.

However, this paralysis has shook the credit markets and caused the French government’s borrowing costs to rise. If the electorate believes it to be responsible, it is a problem for the government, but it is also a problem for the RN.

Many of the RN’s core supporters have an anti-system attitude. Because it is a part of an establishment, they always will be opposed to the government.

But the RN will never win office, and certainly not the presidency, by relying solely on this core base. It needs support from moderate centre-right voters, including those with economically liberal inclinations, who prize economic stability above all. Alienating them is not an option.

As Barnier had intended, the budget dispute has highlighted these internal tensions and harmed the RN’s prospects.

In the hope that Macron can only do so much as resign, the RN’s most likely response is to try to shift the blame back onto the government. Le Pen is waiting in the distance.

Simon Toubeau is an associate professor at the University of Nottingham’s School of Politics and International Relations.

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading