Raised on oil: Azerbaijan takes the driver’s seat in global climate talks but will ‘black gold’ legacy threaten its green transition?

Even though that would improve Azerbaijan’s individual national emissions of greenhouse gases, it only raises the issue of polluters purchasing its gas exports. &nbsp,

Export emissions are generally not included in climate finance, leaving nations that buy and use power with a burden of pollution.

It is why there should be increased attention on the overall energy network, from producer to seller to buyer, much of which has a strong American footprint, said Ms Kate Watters, director of Crude Accountability, a animal rights and economic watchdog for the Persian Basin.

She has serious concerns about the allegations of Azerbaijan’s weak human rights history, lack of transparency on key issues and rooted levels of corruption, byproducts of a resource-heavy, generally state-controlled business.

She cited the significant investments made by companies like BP, Total, and ExxonMobil, Europe’s growing dependence on its energy exports, and the international green funding flowing to solar power projects that are truly substituting in place of the national gas that supplies Azerbaijan’s oil sector.” I think one of the most important things to understand is our responsibility as Western consumers of fossil fuels in what’s happening in Azerbaijan best then,” she said.

Are they simply exporting their carbon pollution to Europe if we examine the entire supply chain from beginning to end? Does that actually address the concerns about how to achieve a more green coming and less carbon emissions? No, it merely pushes the bits around”, she said.

According to the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, published by Transparency International, Azerbaijan ranks 154th out of 180 locations with a score of 23 out of 100, making it one of the most crooked countries in the world.

In October, members of the German parliament highly condemned the” Azerbaijan regime’s historic home and extraterritorial repression of activists, journalists, opposition leaders, and people” and even labelled its “ongoing human rights abuses… incompatible with its hosting of the climate event”.

They requested that the EU-Azerbaijani strategic energy partnership be suspended.

The UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review Working Group also reviewed Azerbaijan’s human rights record for the fourth time in late 2023, and 319 recommendations were made.

The government agreed to adopt 185 of those, including measures related to civil and political rights, anti-corruption and national human rights legislation.

In order to “discredit the image of Azerbaijan and undermine its position,” President Ilham Aliyev has previously referred to allegations of corruption by his family and government as “insinuations or half truths.”

Continue Reading

China’s .4 trillion debt swap girds for Trump tariffs to come – Asia Times

The US$ 1.4 trillion debt swap package announced by China today ( November 8 ) may have a more significant impact than what might seem.

The shift to mortgage regional authorities bill, approved by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, marks the first such effort since 2015 to increase the debt roof for communities.

It comes amid concerns about a new Donald Trump presidency that will restore world trade wars, inflationary pressures, and great youth unemployment.

The swap agreement, according to Finance Minister Lan Fo’an, “is a big policy decision taking into account international and domestic advancement environments, the need to maintain the stability of the financial and fiscal operations, and the actual development situation of nearby governments.”

Lan reckons the swap might save roughly 600 billion yuan ( US$ 84 billion ) in interest payments over five years, freeing additional resources to boost investment and consumption. As of the close of 2023, Lan estimates, China’s excellent hidden debt was 14.3 trillion yuan.

Some economists think Friday’s action is enough to revive assurance, as evidenced by a fall in stocks and the renminbi. Most people do n’t believe that this will be the final attempt to alter the story.

As Carlos&nbsp, Casanova, scholar at Union Bancaire Privée, sees it,” the local authorities debt swap program remains inadequate, but extra measures could inspire a recovery in personal investment and a broadening of local consumption”.

Some economists believe that there might still be room for more immediate action to increase home need. What the transfer system may do, though, is get Xi’s Communist Party some time to implement critically needed changes.

Everyone is aware that Team Xi needs to concentrate on strengthening money markets and repairing the property market. Beijing has act more quickly to lessen its hold on power over state-owned enterprises and create more room for startups to stifle the economy. Additionally, authorities had create stronger social safety nets to encourage families to invest more and keep less.

However, despite the desire for these improvements, international investors rarely grant Beijing the patience to carry them out. And efforts to fix, change or adapt China’s economic engines are sure to lower rise significantly. Markets, though, wo n’t hear of it.

Any hint of disappointing island progress causes Chinese stocks to be sold off by international investors. It encourages economists all over to describe the decline in global progress, trade flows, and commodity prices in frequently depressing, market-deflating conditions.

It results in Xi becoming the financial relative of a CEO struggling to produce quarterly earnings. This pattern fosters short-termism, which is one that contributes to Beijing’s gradual progress with China Inc.

Granted, Xi’s group does itself no privileges by continuing to reveal annual development goals. Setting subjective GDP goals year after year distorts incentives and causes policymakers to promote trigger over supply-side retooling.

With this most recent trigger explosion, Xi’s reform team may gain some reluctance from global markets. It’s ambitious enough to convince skeptical people that China is committed to permanently putting an end to recession.

Restoring trust “relies on fiscal and monetary policy help lifting minimum demand”, says Alex Muscatelli, scientist at Fitch Ratings. ” If present trends in the home market are exacerbated, price falls may be entrenched”.

Muscatelli adds that there is a chance of sustained value declines as a result of the “potential exacerbation of recent supply and demand styles coupled with demographic and debts overhang challenges.”

Avoiding that “exacerbation” means pairing monetary and fiscal stimulus with strong revamping moves to increase China’s dynamic activity.

Premier Li Qiang stated in a statement at the China International Import Expo that Beijing has “ample room for fiscal plan and financial policy,” adding that the country will meet the country’s 5 % goal this year. ” The Taiwanese government has the ability to push sustained financial improvement”, Li said.

However Trump’s re-election ups the ante on Beijing. Travel January 2025, when he’s sworn in, Trump will be on the time to hit 60 % levies on Asia’s biggest economy, as he vowed he would on the plan path.

” To mitigate rising US taxes on the market, we believe Beijing had probably scale up governmental stimulus”, says Robin Xing, a planner at Morgan Stanley. Xi may feel compelled to do something about them the more Trump raises trade tensions, according to Xing.

With a Trump success, ING Bank’s main China analyst Lynn Song adds that” the chances for a larger policy assistance package will increase fairly.”

Although China is more prepared to stifle global trade, Eurasia Group’s China practice’s managing director Rick Waters claims Beijing may struggle to stop the collateral damage.

According to Waters,” I believe the challenge is that China is still at a structural disadvantage in a trade war because they lack symmetry.” When the US imposes tariffs on them, they are unable to do so.

Song counters that” the first trade war was a game changer, many companies were caught off guard, and investors were left scrambling. Trump’s proposed tariffs have been in discussion for some time, so they should n’t surprise you much this time around.

Yet the magnitude of the trade tariffs to come could be unprecedented. Take the 100 % tariffs Trump has threatened on Mexican-made cars. How long do Toyota and Hyundai CEOs anticipate that Trump will extend their agreements to South Korea and Japan?

Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, says,” the world’s second-largest economy is already underperforming, and Beijing is feeling increasingly defensive about the tariff threats coming from hawks like former Trump trade czar Robert Lighthizer”.

The Chinese, Bremmer adds, “are going to be frantically trying to establish back channels to China-friendly Trump allies like Elon Musk, hoping they can facilitate a less confrontational relationship. Trump’s hawks will gain favors and demand an even more confrontational strategy, or both? Beijing will move cautiously and slowly in this environment”.

Alicia García-Herrero, chief Asia-Pacific economist at Natixis, notes that an “insufficient stimulus package, coming on the heels of Trump’s re-election” would backfire, meaning China “needs to find other sources of growth because trade will not make it”.

Another concern is how these and other Trump levies might conflict with Wells Fargo &amp, Co.’s strategy to lower interest rates, writes Brendan McKenna.

More tariffs could fan inflation, he says, adding that the Fed easing “less aggressively” than currently forecast could “act as a tailwind for the dollar”.

China is hardly recession-bound. Data on exports in October, for example, signaled a healthy acceleration — the biggest upshift in activity since mid-2022. In response to Trump’s tariffs, some analysts wonder if Beijing might devalue the yuan in retaliation.

” Beijing might look to devalue the yuan as they did in 2018-2019 to counter tariff effects and boost export competitiveness”, says Dilin Wu, a research strategist at brokerage Pepperstone.

It’s a difficult balancing act. China, after all, is facing multiple challenges from several angles. And if the yuan falls, the biggest of all might get worse. If the yuan drops significantly, property developers who have sizable offshore debt may find it more difficult to make payments.

China’s obsession with annual growth goals plays a major role in the weaker yuan argument. It’s become a particular distraction since the 2008-2009 Lehman Brothers crisis era.

Since then, China’s growth model has relied heavily on municipal leaders around the nation ordering up huge projects: six-lane highways, monorails, international airports, stadiums, conference and shopping centers, city hall complexes, corporate campus districts, five-star hotels, massive museums.

For local government leaders, making China’s annual numbers has dominated the economic incentive structure. A motivated local powerbroker can consistently turn in above-average GDP rates, which is the quickest way to capture Beijing’s attention.

When Xi rose to power in 2012, he pledged to let market forces play a “decisive” role in economic policymaking. Beijing has worked for the past five years to lessen risk in the financial system and reduce risks for property developers to demonstrate this. However, the GDP goal contradicts that priority.

The problem, argues Thomas Helbling, deputy director of the International Monetary Fund’s Asia-Pacific unit, is that” the economy is very investment heavy”.

The biggest headwinds China’s way is being slowed by the property crisis and falling global demand, according to the IMF. Yet, so is a growth model that encourages unproductive borrowing.

Beijing, Helbling says, must level the playing field for private businesses to compete with state-owned enterprises. To encourage consumption and boost investment in education and technology, it must create a strong social safety net. Pension reforms are also crucial to dealing with China’s aging population.

” If you do those reforms, there is an upside to growth”, Helbling concludes.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Great Indian Bustard: Experts hail breakthrough in bid to save native bird

Desert National Park A great Indian bustard chick photographed at the breeding centreDesert National Park

The great Indian bird, a critically endangered parrot found primarily in India, received great news next month.

The first successful spawning of a woman through artificial insemination has been performed by wildlife authorities in the eastern state of Rajasthan.

In one of two breeding facilities in Jaisalmer City, a lone adult male was taught to produce sperm without mating, which was then used to conceive an adult female at a second facility, which is located 200 kilometers ( 124 miles ) away.

According to authorities, the growth was significant because it made it possible to establish a sperm banks.

Great Indian motherfuckers have been the result of biodiversity loss, hunting, and incidents with overhead power lines over the years. Their numbers have fallen from more than 1, 000 in the 1960s to about 150 at provide.

Conservation activists claim that the bear’s wildlife in the area may be protected because the majority of them are found in Jaisalmer. However, this area is prime real estate for alternative energy companies, giving authorities a unique conservation challenge.

Radheshyam Pemani Bishnoi A great Indian bustard seen in the forests of JaisalmerRadheshyam Pemani Bishnoi

The great Indian bustard may not be as well known as the peacock ( India’s national bird ) but it’s just as impressive, says Sumit Dookia, a conservation ecologist who has been studying the bird for close to a decade. The large bird, which weighs between 15kg and 18kg, is one of the biggest flying animals in India.

It once had a significant reputation in the nation, and it can be found in at least 11 states, but only Rajasthan is now home to it, and only a few can be found in Karnataka, the state of Gujarat, which is eastern.

The shy bird, which preys on rodents, snakes, and other pests, is also known as the state bird of Rajasthan and is referred to as” Godawan” by locals as a” Godawan.”

But some of the frog’s special biological traits are clashing with mortal initiatives, making it vulnerable to extinction.

For one, the great Indian bird has great front vision but weak peripheral vision, which makes it difficult for them to place energy lines until they fly very near to them. Because of their large size, they have trouble changing their flight way immediately, and they eventually collide with the wires and pass away.

As the birds spends a lot of time on land, their vision might have developed in this way, says Mr. Dookia. Without a eggs or any other form of protection, it also lay its eggs on the ground, he adds, which might have led to the development of fine area vision.

The outstanding American bird even practices unusual breeding methods. The animal cares for its young over the course of two years by laying just one chicken at a time.

It lays roughly four-five hens in its life, which are many of which are destroyed by predators, according to Mr. Dookia, since it reaches maturity at four years old and lives for 12 to fifteen years.

Desert National Park A great Indian bustard egg lies on the ground in the wildDesert National Park

According to biologists, solar and wind energy farms have taken over the great Indian bustard’s wildlife in Jaisalmer over the past few years, increasing the number of flying accidents there.

According to Mr. Dookia,” The increased human existence has even increased the amount of feces that attract stray dogs who kill the animals or damage their eggs.”

In order to increase the bird’s people, Rajasthan’s state and the federal government collaborated to establish a restoration breeding facility in Sam City in 2018. According to Ashish Vyas, a senior jungle official in Jaisalmer, an additional breeding center was established at Ramdevra community in 2022.

Researchers first gathered exotic egg hives and placed them in incubators as a first step. ” Currently, there are 45 birds in both the centres, 14 of which are captive-bred chicks ( including the one born through artificial insemination )”, he adds.

The goal is to increase the bird’s population before gradually releasing them into the crazy. However, biologists claim that this is simpler to say than to do.

Desert National Park Great Indian bustards photographed with their human handlers at the breeding centre in JaisalmerDesert National Park

According to Mr. Dookia, the birds born in these breeding centers have lost about 60 % of their ability to survive in the wild and have imprinted on human researchers ( in other words, they have formed close bonds with their human caretakers ).

People etching is necessary for birds ‘ nutrition and care, but it also causes them to lose their natural instincts. It will be really hard to re-wild them, especially if there’s no wildlife left for the animals to be released into”, he adds.

Researchers have discovered that the birds ‘ former state have almost entirely stopped migrating because of the loss of habitat. Yet in Jaisalmer, where the species are found in two pouches- Pokhran in the southeast part of the city and the Desert National Park in the west- there’s rarely any cross-migration, says Mr Dookia.

He adds that it’s possible that the animals have stopped migrating so far because of flying injuries. This increases the risk of offspring, which could result in baby problems.

” So, the only solution to save the excellent Indian bird is to maintain its natural habitat”, he says.

Environmentalists are nervous, however, by a Supreme Court decision from April.

An earlier time buy that had advised Rajasthan and Gujarat to prioritize moving energy cables underwater in prime Indian bustard habitats was overturned. Green energy companies were upset by the order because they claimed it would cost them billions of rupees and essentially destroy their business.

Radheshyam Pemani Bishnoi A great Indian bustard found dead on the ground after it crashed into an overhead powerlineRadheshyam Pemani Bishnoi

In its most recent decision, the judge made the observation that people had the right to avoid climate change’s negative results and that it might not be financially and technically possible for businesses to move large amounts of power cords beneath.

Additionally, it recommended that a committee be established to examine the feasibility of moving energy lines and the effectiveness of animal diverters, which are products that are attached to power wires to warn birds about their appearance.

Conservationists and some legal experts claim that the best court’s decision is dangerous because it pits one great trigger against another. Corporates have praised the ruling, but conservationists and some legal experts claim that it is difficult.

“The judgment brings into focus a flawed understanding of the interplay between climate change, biodiversity and development issues,” ecologist Debadityo Sinha wrote in a column.

He noted that many densely populated Indian cities have underground power lines, and that other states have already taken steps to protect other bird species. He also made the point that although moving power cables underground is expensive, it is likely to account for only a small percentage of a company’s overall earnings.

According to Mr. Dookia, the low cost of land has a role in why renewable energy companies are emigrating to Rajasthan.

There is n’t much research done on how these renewable energy farms will affect the state’s climate and ecology over the long term, he says.

” So it’s not just the bird’s future that hangs in the balance, it’s also man’s”.

Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

Read more India stories:

Continue Reading

‘Middle of the world’: How the UAE is drawing more tech talent amid US-China AI race

In Dubai, it works with a regional partner that has experience with facilities and the&nbsp, health government of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, the former being&nbsp, the UAE’s capital and largest province.

” It’s great to have experienced colleagues in the region”, he said. There are a lot of confidence and personal relationships that matter, in Southeast Asia and the Middle East, in my opinion.

The Decision Labs was given the opportunity to apply for a position in a start-up program for biotechnology and life science called HealthX after giving a presentation at a meeting in Abu Dhabi in May. It was successful and established relationships with neighborhood hospitals.

” Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are all experiencing significant growth and expenditure.” The entire electronic change, particularly in heath, is happening as we are speaking”, said Mr Anupam.

For example, he just understood that there were investors willing to finance it during a private conversation with an established at a UAE state institution.

” They are ready to ship the best skills, be it from Singapore, from the US, the UK, from the top colleges”, said Mr Anupam, who is an American citizen and in Dubai on a public manager card.

He is trained in statistical economy and has a master of business administration from&nbsp, HEC Paris&nbsp, and&nbsp, MIT Sloan School of Management.

When The Decision Labs actually signs a project that, his staff, which consists of about 18 people, currently consists of about 18 in Bangalore, Malaysia, and the Philippines.

SINGAPORE, DUBAI CAN LEARN FROM EACH OTHER

Given their reputations as aircraft hubs, economic centers, gateways to their particular regions, and their desire to be it and start-up hubs, some observers have compared Singapore and Dubai to being competitors.

But people beg to differ.

” They are so geographically far away that I do n’t think they should be competitors”, said Mr Skoumal of the two cities, which are a seven-and-a-half-hour flight apart.

” They do n’t fight for the same customers. They do n’t fight for the same companies. They have their own industry”, said Mr Skoumal.

” I feel like they can learn from each other, and I guess they are doing it”, he said, citing both places ‘ attempts to digitalise state systems.

Continue Reading

The recurring Trump nightmare: Can Asia manage what’s coming? – Asia Times

Donald Trump has regained control of the United States, overcoming a flurry of worry and anti-incumbent desire for change. Since the Civil War, Americans have been subjected to the most rigorous examination of the political and legal order.

But for the rest of the world, it is a little less horrific time. The United States is now on the verge of disbanding its post democratic order.

What does Trump’s gain think for Asia and for British friends in Japan, South Korea and the Pacific?

Some British security experts, including would-be officials to Trump, may reassure Japanese and Korean officials with their comforting words. Everything will change in the Indo-Pacific under Trump, those authorities guidance. Just before the vote, RAND specialist on Eastern protection and former intelligence official Derek Grossman wrote in The Diplomat that” US foreign policy in this region is likely to continue constant.”

Trump, in Grossman’s giving, may be” a more interpersonal and uncertain head” but he left relationships in the region intact. No matter what happens,” the China factor will encourage the US empire network’s continued growth.”

Such views ignore the numerous evidence, mostly in Trump’s own words, of his goal at the end of the first name to leave a huge portion of those alliance commitments.

Trump planned to remove US forces from South Korea, to finish the empty deal with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, and to need large sums from Japan to cover the cost of the American security role, as his previous defense secretary Mark Esper and National Security Advisor John Bolton described in their memoirs.

The calming evaluations even go back on Trump’s repeated plans to impose large, broad-based tariffs on foreign goods, tariffs that target both allies in Europe and Asia as well as China.

More important, the idea that international legislation in Asia may be distinct and separate from what happens elsewhere, especially in Europe and the Middle East, is an idea.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally altered the safety position in East Asia, as Japan’s personal National Security Strategy document demonstrates. It has resulted in a nearby military ties between Russia, China, and North Korea, which threatens the security of Taiwan, East Asia, and the Korean Peninsula.

Trump repeatedly stated his intentions, just like his running mate JD Vance, by cutting off military aid to Ukraine and forcing Kyiv to embrace Vladimir Putin’s surrender terms.

He even threatened to renounce his determination to NATO’s security. That would allow Putin to reclaim control of some of the Soviet empire, starting with the European state and threatening Poland.

Trump may feel like he has an democratic mandate to do these outrageous items, predicts Michael McFaul, former US ambassador to Russia and chairman of Stanford University’s Institute for International Studies.

He believes that the American people support him in saying to Putin,” Do whatever the devil you want” when it comes to things like NATO or our friends in Asia. I believe that history demonstrates that when we are robust, the United States of America, can manifest greater peace through power. When we signal failure, when we try to appease rulers, that’s when negative things can happen”.

Trump’s second term saw the release of trustworthy figures from the Democratic national security elite, as well as his own incompetence and lack of familiarity with the levers of power, in large part due to his own incompetence and lack of experience with those levers. These restrictions will no longer remain in place.

According to McFaul, “he relied on traditional Republican to complete his foreign policy team” in his first term, including those at Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Defense James Mattis, and national security advisers HR McMaster and John Bolton.

They most undoubtedly prevented Trump from implementing some of his most outrageous proposals, including pulling out of NATO because he was at the bottom of that list. What’s going to be different this time around is that none of those folks are going to be in the Trump presidency, he’s disparaged all of them.”

What about China? And North Korea?

Despite these worries, it is assumed that Trump did at least view China as the country’s main attack, particularly in terms of trade and economic policy. Because of this, the relationships in Northeast Asia will continue to be valuable to a Trump presidency, according to Chinese politicians and, to a lesser degree, those in South Korea.

Even if that is accurate, it does not indicate that Seoul or Tokyo will have easy sailing. It may result in more pressure on both friends to spend more on defense and to join in export controls and other trade and investment restraints with China, which could have serious implications for their economy.

” The Trump presidency is going to bend a lot of arms,” says Tobias Harris, the leader of Japan Foresight, a recognized expert business, and the twistees had” better be ready for that.”

Trump’s advisors have already pushed Japan to significantly increase its defense spending beyond the target of 2 % of GDP and assume full responsibility for its own defense.

The Trump tax policy may cause an even greater issue, argues Harris:

If Trump follows through, even partially, on risks to impose off-the-board levies on US goods, plus important imports on US tariffs from China and Mexico, it will have a significant, immediate effect on Japan’s largest manufacturers, prompting them to ponder whether to switch manufacturing to the US, back to Japan or to other markets. Japanese companies may also have to navigate political and national security issues if they decide to invest in the US in response to the Trump administration’s policies. However, as Trump’s vocal opposition to Nippon Steel’s bid for US Steel suggests, they may also have to navigate these issues.

It may be premature, however, to assume that Trump will want to line up Japan and South Korea for a grand confrontation with China. Some analysts believe Trump might instead choose to strike a grand bargain with Xi Jinping, which might even include leaving Taiwan.

During the campaign, the President-elect criticized Taiwan’s companies for destroying the US semiconductor industry and questioned whether the US should defend itself.

Making China the main target or the heart of his second persona is unnecessary and possibly unthinkable, according to a former senior intelligence official and long-time China expert.

There is likely to be little for him or his minions to receive in the near future. He will bluster, threaten tariffs and brag about his relationship with Xi, but probably not come out swinging.”

Trump’s new primary backer, billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has extensive business ties in China, where over half of the company’s global car production takes place at its massive Shanghai factory.

Trump-Kim bromance

Kim Jong Un, a dictator of North Korea, may be Trump’s other love interest. Trump continues to gloat about how close he and Kim are, and he feels bad that they lacked a chance to reach a deal.

That agreement, which was almost reached at their second summit in Hanoi, was undermined by both Kim’s overly grand demands and opposition from within Trump’s own administration, which were supported by Shinzo Abe’s intervention.

There will be no such resistance within the new administration. And Japan’s current prime minister, Shigeru Ishiba, does not have any such relationship with Trump as the late Abe had, nor is he likely to be able to create one. Kim may be the most significant obstacle to a deal, which would put an end to North Korea’s nuclear arsenal and missile launchers.

Trump may claim that Kim has a warm welcome from Kim, but the North Koreans have since formed a close military ally with Russia, which has resulted in the deployment of 12, 000 troops on the Ukrainian front. A Trump-Putin embrace would likely have to follow, and Kim most likely would use his new authority to demand a much higher payoff.

A breakdown in US-South Korean ties, which include demands to renegotiate Korea’s defense cost-sharing agreements, and the start of the roughly 28,500 US troops stationed there, would be a more likely development.

Trump appears to be ready to redefine his relationship with South Korea as an ally as US forces reorient themselves toward direct confrontation with China, according to Benjamin Engel of Seoul’s Dankook University, who spoke to NK News.

Whither Japan?

The ruling Liberal Democratic Party lost its majority in last month’s election, which is shocking for Japan. Ishiba, the prime minister, has the unusual task of creating a minority government. The ability of Japan to navigate this new, extremely dangerous situation is being hindered by internal political paralysis in Tokyo, as a veteran observer of Japan put it to me.

Ishiba congratulated Trump right away and, as one might expect, expressed hope that the postwar security alliance would continue to serve as the basis for US-Japan relations.

But let’s say Trump heads head on the wrong path, undermining that alliance, or even compulsion an unnecessary confrontation with China. In that situation, Japan might feel compelled to look for alternatives, such as strengthening ties with Beijing while flattering the newly powerful American autocrat.

” Japanese are not going to end the alliance,” says Japan expert Harris”. However, they will need to develop more self-control skills.

The Oriental Economist published this article on its own. It is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

Trump’s return will change Asia’s trade game – Asia Times

Donald Trump’s election win is creating new financial relationships for Asia, bringing both confusion and tactical opportunities. &nbsp,

Trump’s policies, generally known for prioritizing strong British benefits, are now raising concerns across Eastern markets, where trade, investment and political stability could all be significantly affected. &nbsp,

Trump’s re-election is likely to sign a return to heightened business conflicts, particularly with China. His past leadership set a precedent by imposing severe tariffs on Chinese goods, citing trade imbalances and fears about intellectual property.

The charges, which swelled into a trade war in large numbers, disrupted global supply chains and shook up industries that depend heavily on US-China business. &nbsp,

Trump is anticipated to revise or expand this strategy. On the campaign trail, the businessman-cum-politician frequently said he would impose 60 % tariffs on all Chinese goods and 20 % on all other nations ‘ imports.

If fully implemented, this threats risks China as well as other Asian countries whose supply chains are tied together.

A new trade war, in the eyes of China, would only add to the financial strains it is already experiencing due to a lingering house crisis and a weak domestic economy, which have raised doubts about whether it will be able to meet its 5 % GDP growth target.

The past Trump administration’s taxes pressured China to reassess its business methods, pushing it to get deeper regional partnerships.

China can be expected to look to expand its industry alliances in Asia further, especially within the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP ) free trade bloc, if these taxes are increased or more stringent laws are implemented.

The shift could lessen its dependence on US markets, leading to a more cohesive and dependent Asian trade bloc, and easing the impact of revived tariffs on the country’s crucial export market.

Under Trump 2.0, smaller economies in the region that serve as intermediaries between the world’s two largest markets in terms of business are also likely to experience a more difficult setting. &nbsp,

Places like Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia, which benefited from various benefits from the last trade war’s producing shifts, may experience additional risks if tariffs continue to stifle supply chains.

Additionally, they run the risk of receiving tariff-sensitive items because their products are shipped from a factory elsewhere.

In response to the business tensions, these nations may be able to produce more products, but the confusion of sustained demand may restrict capital outflows, potentially putting off long-term growth and investment.

In addition, Japan and South Korea might have to make proper choices about how to deal with China and America. Both countries are important US allies and depend heavily on imports, especially in high-tech areas like automotives and semiconductors. &nbsp,

With Trump’s renewed effort to reintroduce high-value manufacturing employment to the US, Japanese and South Korean companies that export to the US may experience additional taxes or pressure to move production to fresh American companies.

Both nations will struggle to balance their ties with China, their largest trading partner, and the US, a vital safety alliance, as competition grows to keep the US as a vital business.

Tech issues

In the software industry, Trump’s plans are expected to continue restricting Chinese exposure to US high-end systems, impacting Chinese technology firms like Huawei. &nbsp,

With the result of these limitations, Chinese companies have already been forced to look for alternatives in Asia, which could lead to an increase in modern technology in the region.

China has responded by investing a lot in its domestic semiconductor sector, but the restrictions on sharing technology may cause the differences between nations to grow and make Asian countries choose to take sides in a technical battle. &nbsp,

With more powers putting pressure on nations like Taiwan, which has a strong position in the semiconductor sector, export restrictions or expansions could become more difficult. This could create an environment in which corporate industries can become battlegrounds for power and control.

Under Trump, as traders react to changes in trade relations and international capital flows, the price of the currency areas in Asia may experience significant fluctuations. &nbsp,

On the horizon, Beijing might start implementing capital controls or other measures to maintain the yuan as a result of increased tension.

In addition, emerging Asian currencies may experience uncertainty if taxes or trade restrictions cause their exports to decline, making these nations more prone to cash outflows. Having said that, the current perhaps even present an opportunity for some Asian nations to boost exports as the money rises.

As a result of Trump’s policies, funding flows into Asia may be affected. This could lead to pressure on American businesses to relocate their operations there.

Asia may initially face challenges as a result of this money duplication, especially if Washington implements tax incentives or other measures to encourage more regional growth. &nbsp,

However, if Asia’s economies continue to shift toward consumer-driven models and digital economies, they could attract a new wave of foreign investments that are unrelated to American investments.

Even with shifting US priorities, these markets may still be appealing to international investors because of the favorable demographics and growing middle class in many Asian countries and the spread of digital infrastructure.

While Trump’s second presidency may erect new hurdles and barriers for Asia’s export-geared and investment-dependent economies, the region’s adaptability and integration should allow for resilient responses.

The region could have a foundation to successfully deal with shifting policy directions from a more protectionist administration in Washington thanks to Asia’s extensive trade networks, expanding technological capabilities, and shifting alliances.

Continue Reading