Philippines welcomes removal from global money laundering ‘grey list’  

MANILA: The Philippines welcomed on Saturday ( Feb 22 ) its removal from the “grey list” of a global watchdog on dirty money, saying its exit would ease requirements for cross-border transactions and help boost investments.

The Philippines was removed from its grey list after almost four years, the Financial Action Task Force ( FATF), an intergovernmental organization fighting money laundering and financing terrorism, announced in a statement on Friday. &nbsp,

In June 2021, the Philippines was added to the dark list because of a number of issues, including sanctions unregulated payment providers, mitigating the risks of dirty money with game junkets, and prosecuting violence funding cases.

The FATF urges the Philippines to continue its efforts to ensure that its CFT ( countering of the financing of terrorism ) measures are properly implemented, according to the FATF.

The Philippines ‘ anti-money trafficking government predicted that the country’s removal from the grey list may lessen requirements for sending money abroad, boost investment, and aid Filipino expats who send remittances through banks.

” The Philippines ‘ exit from the FATF dark record is expected to facilitate faster and lower-cost cross-border purchases, lower compliance obstacles, and improve financial transparency”, it said in a statement on Saturday.

The Philippines ‘ financial system is strengthened by removing itself from the FATF’s dark record, according to the statement.

A nation that has been placed on the FATF’s “grey list” is subject to more intense checking until its fiscal system’s flaws are fixed. &nbsp,

The FATF stated in October that the Philippines “has greatly completed its motion plan.” &nbsp,

In 2000, the Philippines had formerly been grey-listed by FATF because it lacked a strategy to combat money laundering problems. Five years after its amendments to its banks rules, it was removed. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

Trump’s bow to Putin no cause for panic, yet – Asia Times

Under the Trump presidency, the United States ‘ unwavering allegiance to Ukraine appears to be rapidly deteriorating after three years of fighting Russia.

On February 19, 2025, President Donald Trump referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as” a despot” and made up his own accusation of the war that Russia started as a border region land get.

Zelensky, however, said on February 19 that Trump is trapped in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “disinformation place”.

The US and Russia are holding discussions in Saudi Arabia without including Ukraine in order to end the conflict, which is getting worse.

The US and Russia have long been enemies, and the US, to day, has given Ukraine more than US$ 183 billion to help battle against Russia. However, that cash came when Joe Biden was in office. Trump doesn’t seem to have an anti-Ukraine bias.

Tatsiana Kulakevich, a professor of Eastern German politics and international relations, spoke with The Conversation to discuss the repercussions of this sudden change in Trump’s approach to US-Russia plan.

In initial conversations, Kulakevich sees Trump’s actions as being part of a calculated plan rather than as being self-interested.

A person holds a newspaper that shows back-to-back profiles of two men in black and white.
On February 19, 2025, a passenger on an airplane reads a Financial Times post about Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump. Photo: Horacio Villalobos Corbis / Corbis via Getty Images/ The Talk

Does you describe the current relationship between Russia, Ukraine, and the US?

Because the US and Russia are merely having experimental discussions, people shouldn’t get anxious. We may not call them peace deals, per se, at least not yet.

Because there isn’t much to discuss in Saudi Arabia, it was expected that Ukraine wouldn’t be invited to the deals. Other than agreeing to resume normal operation of each other’s diplomatic missions, we are unsure of what the US and Russia are really discussing.

People believe that Russia and the US are in like. But, Trump’s Russia plan has been more aggressive than generally portrayed in the media. Looking back at the previous Trump administration’s report, we can see that if everything is done in the US’s pursuits, then it will not be done. Trump does not do benefits.

He approved the sale of anti-tank missiles to Ukraine in 2019. That same year, Trump withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, an arrangement with Russia that limited what arms each state was order, over Russian transgressions.

Trump also imposed financial sanctions on a Russian ship that was involved in the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines in 2019. These sanctions attempted to stop Russia’s immediate fuel exports to Germany, but Ukraine perceived this link as a threat to the country.

Based on Trump’s talks with Russia and notes against Ukraine, it could seem like the US and Russia are no longer enemies. How do you think this is?

There are no conclusive evidence that Russia and the US no longer had a relationship with one another. Despite Trump’s infrequent usage of terms like “friends” in politics, his language usually serves as a tactical movement rather than a real shift in partnerships. His interaction with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, where Trump alternated between politeness and threats to extort money, is a prime example.

Even if the US is meeting with Russia and the public tale seems to suggest then, carefully, abandoning Ukraine is not in the United States ‘ best interests. One reason for this is that the US’s rejection of Ukraine did bring both China and Russia joy. Trump has viewed China as a major risk to the US, and it has supported Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is even quoted as saying that everyone will be present for a potential peace agreement, including Ukraine.

Before this national election, there was a long-running campaign claiming that Russia was holding some data over Trump and blackmailing him, but that this was before Trump started imposing measures against Russia during his first name.

More than 50 policy steps were taken by the first Trump administration to combat Moscow, mainly through public statements and restrictions.

What benefits does Russia’s political relationship offer the US?

Trump is a contextual politician. As some Russian officials have said in recent Saudi Arabian deals with the Trump administration, British businesses may benefit from US alignment with Russia and Soviet businesses.

But the US may also benefit financially from the Trump government’s proposed bargain with Ukraine to give the US quarter of Ukraine’s estimated US$ 11.5 trillion in unusual earth minerals.

This year, Zelensky rejected that suggestion, claiming that it does not include the assurance that the US will continue to provide Ukraine with security guarantees.

Generally, since the Cold War, there has been a political square between the Soviet Union – after Russia – China and the US. And there have always been rival edges on both sides. Trump may be trying to distance himself from China by trying to establish a better political relationship with Russia.

A similar dynamic is playing out between the US and Belarus ‘ autocratic president, Alexander Lukashenko, a co-aggressor in the conflict in Ukraine. Ukraine has close ties to both China and Russia.

In exchange for the transfer of imprisoned people of Belarus ‘ political opposition, the US administration is considering a relaxation of sanctions against Belarusian businesses and export of potash, a crucial component of fertilizer.

There are over 1, 200 political detainees in Belarus. This US international policy approach aims to give Lukashenko the opportunity to grow less financially dependent on China and Russia.

A person brushes snow at a gravesite that has photos of people on crosses and blue and yellow flags.
A contractor clears snow from a cemetery in Kramatorsk, Ukraine, on February 17, 2025. More than 46, 000 Russian soldiers have died in battle, according to some estimates, since Russia’s war in February 2022. Photo: Pierre Crom / Getty Images/ The Talk

Is this level of collaboration between the US and Russia exceptional?

While US-Russia ties are often defined by conflict, history shows that pragmatic cooperation has occurred when both countries saw mutual benefits – whether this relates to arms power, area, terrorism, Arctic affairs or wellbeing.

In addition, the US has always given its own objectives precedence over those of Russia. For instance, the US and its allies imposed restrictions on Russia’s plutonium and copper companies just in May 2024, over two decades after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. If America sanctioned plutonium and nickel, it would have had to balance its proper economic ties and concerns about market stability.

The US and other European nations imposed mainly symbolic sanctions after Russia invaded Crimea in 2014, which Russia claims to have its own and supported Russian hardliners in Ukraine’s Donbas region. This included chilling goods of Russian people, restricting some financial dealings and limiting Russia’s exposure to Western technology.

We may also take note that Trump promised to sanction Russia if the Ukraine war does not end in January 2025. Despite the opinions of a near relation between Trump and Putin, the US continues to evade any existing sanctions, which shows its commitment to a hard stance on Russia.

Trump’s harsh speech on Zelensky may be a deliberate negotiation strategy intended to pressure Ukraine into making more concessions in future peace talks more than signaling abandonment, given his transactional nature in terms of foreign policy.

Tatsiana Kulakevich serves as associate professor of education at the University of South Florida’s School of Interdisciplinarity.

This content was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.

Continue Reading

What does Jack Ma’s return to the public spotlight mean?

1 minute ago
João de Silva

Business writer

CCTV Picture of Chinese President Xi Jinping shaking the hand of Alibaba founder Jack Ma.CCTV

After Alibaba leader Jack Ma was photographed at the occasion, a meeting between Chinese president Xi Jinping and some of the country’s top business leaders this week has fueled rumors and pleasure.

The personable and bright Mr Ma, who was one of China’s most prominent traders, had withdrawn from public career after criticising China’s financial market in 2020.

His arrival at Monday’s celebration has sparked a flood of conversation, with experts and researchers wondering what it means for him, China’s technology sector and the economy in public.

The answer has been largely positive- technology stocks, including those of Alibaba, rallied soon after the event.

On Thursday, the e-commerce large reported financial benefits that struck aspirations, with stock ending the trading day in New York more than 8 % higher. The company’s shares are up 60 % since the beginning of the year.

What do analysts think about Mr. Ma’s attendance at the event along with other well-known guests, including DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng?

Is Jack Ma’ rehabilitated’?

As soon as Chinese state media began to publish images of the event, analysts began looking for clues about the significance of the meeting.

” Jack Ma’s attendance, his seating in the front row, even though he did not speak, and his handshake with Xi are clear signs he has been rehabilitated”, China analyst Bill Bishop wrote.

Users praised Mr. Ma for his return to the public eye on social media, which was rife with praise.

” Congratulations]Jack ] Ma for the safe landing”, said one user on Chinese social media platform Weibo.

” The comeback of]Jack ] Ma is a shot in the arm to the current Chinese economy”, said another.

It is surprising that observers have given an appearance by Mr. Ma such a high priority.

Before his disappearance from public life in 2020- following comments at a financial conference that China’s state-owned banks had a “pawn-shop mentality”- Mr Ma was the poster boy for China’s tech industry.

Reuters Jack Ma, co-founder of Alibaba Group, at the Vivatech startups and innovation fair, in Paris in 2019. Reuters

An English teacher with no background in computing, Mr Ma co-founded Alibaba in his apartment more than two decades ago after convincing a group of friends to invest in his online marketplace.

He later became one of the richest men in China by founding one of the biggest tech conglomerates.

That was before his “pawn shop” comment, when he also lamented the “lack of innovation” in the country’s banks.

It led to the cancellation of his$ 34.5bn ( £27.4bn ) stock market flotation of Ant Group, his financial technology giant.

At the time, Beijing attempted to demonize a business that had grown too powerful and a leader who had grown too outspoken.

Analysts agree that the fact he’s back in the spotlight, at a symposium where Xi Jinping himself presided, is a very good sign for Mr Ma.

However, some caution is needed because his absence from the speakers may indicate that he has not fully reclaimed his exalted status.

Additionally, the lack of coverage his attendance in Chinese media outlets appears to indicate that he has not undergone a complete recovery.

Is the tech industry’s crackdown over?

Xi Jinping told participants at the symposium that their companies needed to innovate, grow and remain confident despite China’s economic challenges, which he described as “temporary” and “localised”.

He added that now is the ideal time for private businesses and private entrepreneurs to show their full potential.

This has been widely accepted as the government telling private tech companies that they are also back in good graces.

Mr Ma’s downfall had preceded a broader crackdown on China’s tech industry.

State control over significant digital assets was a much harder reality for businesses as a result of stricter data security and competition laws.

Other companies across the private sector, ranging from education to real estate, also ended up being targeted in what came to be known as the” common prosperity” campaign.

Some people thought the common prosperity policies were intended to rein in the billionaire owners of some of China’s biggest corporations, giving them more influence over how their businesses run and how their profits were distributed.

However, as Beijing implemented stringent new rules, billions of dollars were wiped from the value of some of these businesses, many of them tech firms, rattling international investors.

This, along with a worsening global economy that was affected by the pandemic as well as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, has contributed to considerable changes in China’s economic situation.

Growth has slowed, jobs for the country’s youth have become more scarce and, amid a property sector downturn, people are not spending enough.

As rumours that Mr Ma would attend Monday’s meeting began to spread, so did a glimmer of hope. According to Richard Windsor, director of technology at Counterpoint, Mr. Ma’s presence would indicate that China’s leadership “had enough of stagnation and could be prepared to let the private sector have a much freer hand.”

In addition to Mr. Ma and Mr. Liang, prominent figures from the tech and industrial sectors included those from Huawei, the telecommunications and smartphone industry, BYD, and many others.

” The]guest ] list showcased the importance of internet/tech/AI/EV sectors given their representation of innovation and achievement”, said a note from market analysts at Citi.

” ]It ] likely indicates the importance of technology… and the contribution of private enterprises to the development and growth of China’s economy”.

Those present at the meeting appeared to share that impression. Lei Jun, the chief executive of consumer electronics giant Xiaomi, told state media that he senses the president’s” care and support” for businesses.

Is it because of US sanctions?

The symposium was held after the country experienced what some observers have called the arrival of DeepSeek’s disruptive R1 artificial intelligence ( AI ) model at the end of last month.

The Chinese-made AI chatbot rose quickly among the list of applications and quickly gained popularity worldwide. It also triggered a sudden sell-off of major US tech stocks, as fears mounted over America’s leadership in the sector.

Back in China, the app’s widespread success has sparked a wave of national pride that has quickly spread to the financial markets. Investment has been made into Chinese stocks, particularly those of tech companies listed in Hong Kong and mainland China.

Goldman Sachs, the world’s largest investment bank, has also changed its outlook on Chinese stocks, citing the potential for rapid AI adoption to increase companies ‘ revenues and entice up to$ 200 billion in investment.

The main difference between this innovation and DeepSeek’s was that it was forced to make an ingenious decision due to China’s ban on the export of advanced chips and technology.

Xinhua Picture of Chinese President Xi Jinping meeting with business leadersXinhua

Now, with Trump back in the White House and his fondness of trade tariffs, Mr Xi may have found it necessary to recalibrate his approach to China’s entrepreneurs.

Some analysts believe Monday’s meeting was a step backwards in an effort to steer investors and businesses away from Mr. Xi’s national priorities rather than a return to an era of unregulated growth.

The Chinese president has been placing a greater emphasis on policies that the government has referred to as “high-quality development” and “new productive forces.”

Such ideas have been used to reflect a switch from what were previously fast drivers of growth, such as property and infrastructure investment, towards high-end industries such as semiconductors, clean energy and AI.

The goal is to achieve” socialist modernisation” by 2035- higher living standards for everyone, and an economy driven by advanced manufacturing and less reliant on imports of foreign technology.

Mr. Xi is aware that in order to get there, he will need the private sector a to be fully involved.

An associate professor at the University of Technology Sydney, Marina Zhang, stated to the BBC,” JackMa’s ] reappearance suggests that Beijing is pivoting from crackdowns to controlled engagement” rather than the end of the tech sector scrutiny.

The private sector must align with national priorities, including self-reliance in key technologies and strategic industries, while the private sector is still a pillar of China’s economic ambitions.

Continue Reading

Bank of Thailand ‘should lower rates’

Economic hardship of people very great: PM

(Photo: 123RF)
( Photo: 123RF )

The , Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is urging,

( BoT ) to lower interest rates, saying a reduction will help ease the public’s financial burden.

Ms. Paetongtarn stated at the” Matichon Leadership Forum 2025 Trust Thailand” on Wednesday that the Thai economy started to show signs of recovery toward the end of last year, with growth reaching 2.5 %, slightly higher than the 2 % target set for 2023.

Bank of Thailand 'should lower rates'

The treatment, she said, was driven by the president’s monetary stimulus measures that resulted in increased customer investing and a fall in tourist visitors following the expansion of the region’s visa-free policy.

The government is expecting the economy to grow by 3 % this year, spurred by higher private-sector investment, more consumer spending and the launch of several state investment projects.

But, Ms. Paetongtarn acknowledged that due to low investment in the industrial sector and liquidity issues brought on by high interest rates, the nation’s economic growth rate is low compared to other nations in the area.

She claimed that commercial banks are cautious when offering loans, which has had a negative impact on small and medium-sized businesses ( SMEs ), which account for about 75 % of the nation’s businesses.

” The lack of access to funding is restricting our ability to invest and grow]Thai SMEs], which is starting to affect different business”, she said.

Commercial banks need to make sure there is a sufficient source of revenue, and the BoT should think about cutting interest rates, which will also aid some households who are struggling with daily expenses.

She said a rate cut didn’t have an negative impact on the economy, as the country’s inflation rate is low.

At the conference, she highlighted a number of Pheu Thai activities which are meant to provide debt relief to businesses and homeowners, including the” Khun Su, Rao Chuay” structure, which was designed to help those struggling with loan, car, and SME mortgage payments.

The PM said several debt reduction plans rolled out by her state, as well as the previous leadership under Srettha Thavisin, have helped 830, 000 consumers clear their debt.

The government has instructed the Finance Ministry to hold discussions with the BoT to increase access to funding for borrowers and is assisting another 260, 000 people in clearing their debts accounts, she continued.

According to Ms Paetongtarn, the Srettha administration’s efforts to attract foreign investment have led to a 35 % increase in investment, totalling about 1.14 trillion baht, or 5 % of GDP.

She claimed that her government is working to re-invest the money in various companies and provide more opportunities.

Continue Reading

BoT ‘should lower rates’

Financial hardship of people very great: PM

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is urging the Bank of Thailand ( BoT ) to lower interest rates, claiming a drop will help lower the public’s financial burden.

Ms. Paetongtarn stated at the” Matichon Leadership Forum 2025 Trust Thailand” on Wednesday that the Thai economy started to show signs of recovery toward the end of last year, with growth reaching 2.5 %, slightly higher than the 2 % target set for 2023.

The treatment, she said, was driven by the president’s monetary stimulus measures that resulted in increased customer investing and a fall in tourist visitors following the expansion of the region’s visa-free policy.

The government is expecting the economy to grow by 3 % this year, spurred by higher private-sector investment, more consumer spending and the launch of several state investment projects.

But, Ms. Paetongtarn acknowledged that the nation’s rate of economic growth is minimal compared to other nations in the area as a result of low investment in the business industry as well as liquidity issues brought on by high interest rates.

She noted that commercial banks are cautious about lending money, which has led to a cash shortage that has had a significant impact on small and medium-sized enterprises ( SMEs ), which account for about 75 % of all businesses in the nation.

” The lack of access to funding is restricting our ability to invest and grow]Thai SMEs], which is starting to affect other business”, she said.

Commercial banks may consider cutting interest rates, which will also help many families who are struggling with daily costs, to ensure there is a sufficient supply of money.

She said a rate cut didn’t have an negative impact on the economy, as the country’s inflation rate is low.

At the conference, she highlighted a number of Pheu Thai activities which are meant to provide debt relief to businesses and homeowners, including the” Khun Su, Rao Chuay” structure, which was designed to help those struggling with loan, car, and SME mortgage payments.

The PM said several debt reduction plans rolled out by her state, as well as the previous leadership under Srettha Thavisin, have helped 830, 000 consumers clear their debts.

The government has instructed the Finance Ministry to hold discussions with the BoT to improve access to funding for borrowers and is assisting another 260, 000 people in clearing their debt accounts, she continued.

According to Ms Paetongtarn, the Srettha administration’s efforts to attract foreign investment have led to a 35 % increase in investment, totalling about 1.14 trillion baht, or 5 % of GDP.

She claimed that her government is working to reinvest the money into the economy and provide additional incentives for various sectors.

Continue Reading

High Court extends jail term of flooring company CEO who cheated 3 banks of S million

SINGAPORE: The High Court&nbsp, on Wednesday ( Feb 19 ) extended the jail term of&nbsp, the former CEO of a timber flooring firm who cheated banks into disbursing over S$ 2 million ( US$ 1.5 million ) in loans.

Jason Sim Chon Ang, the leader of the now-defunct Jason Parquet Specialist, &nbsp, was convicted in 2023 on five claims of lying, but acquitted of a command under the Organizations Act. He received a three-year prison sentence.

The High Court on Wednesday overturned Sim’s conviction and increased his prison term by three years and eight months, according to the authorities in a media release.

WHAT HAPPENED

From 2012 to 2015, Sim applied for debts from three banks – DBS, Standard Chartered and Maybank– using fake invoices and shipping orders for&nbsp, forest.

The forged papers were prepared by a provider, Tati Trading, which led the bankers to receive a total of S$ 2, 035, 000 to the business.

Tjioe Chi Minh, a controlling director at Tati at the time of the crimes, gave the papers their recommendations.

In one of the five false software, a bank was deceived into paying S$ 535, 000 to Tati in September 2012. &nbsp,

Tjioe used the money to purchase 2.5 million shares in Jason Parquet Holdings ‘ initial public offering.

Sim was charged under the Organizations Act for this. &nbsp,

Tjioe faced&nbsp, five counts of abetment of lying and was &nbsp, acquitted in 2023.

After the panders, &nbsp, Sim’s and Tjioe’s prosecutions were overturned. Jioe received a two-year, six-month prison sentence. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

HSBC pre-tax profit climbs 6.6% to .2bn; plans .5bn cost savings by end of 2026 | FinanceAsia

HSBC’s profit before tax ( PBT ) climbed by$ 2 billion to$ 32.3 billion for the financial year ending December 31, 2024, according to a regulatory announcement, profit after tax increased by$ 400 million to$ 25 billion. Overall revenue across the group climbed from$ 66 billion to$ 66.85 billion. &nbsp,

¬ Capitol Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Breaking: HSBC pre-tax profit climbs 6.6% to .2bn; plans .5bn cost savings by end of 2026 | FinanceAsia

HSBC’s profit before tax rose by$ 2 billion to$ 32.3 billion for the financial year ending December 31, 2024, according to a regulatory announcement, profit after tax increased by$ 400 million to$ 25 billion. Overall revenue across the group climves from$ 66 billion to$ 66.85 billion. &nbsp,

¬ Plaza Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading