Cholas: How a dynasty in India created a cultural and economic superpower

Getty Images The Brihadishvara Temple in Thanjavur. The Brihadishwara Temple was built during the 11th century AD by king Rajaraja Chola I of the Chola Empire. The temple is classified as a World Heritage Site by Unesco on July 12, 2016 in Tamil Nadu, India.Getty Images

It’s 1000 CE- the spirit of the Middle Ages.

Europe is in flow. The strong countries that we know today, such as Norman-ruled England and the squabbling regions that will become France, do not yet emerge. Gothic churches with towers have not yet erected. Aside from the remote and rich city of Constantinople, some fantastic industrial centres dominate the landscape.

However, that same year, an Indian prince from southern India was gearing up to construct the largest church in the world.

Completed just 10 years later, it was 216ft ( 66m ) tall, assembled from 130, 000 tonnes of granite: second only to Egypt’s pyramids in height. A 12 foot high Hindu god Shiva sign was enshrined in gold and embellished with gems and pearls at its core.

There were 60 bronze sculptures with thousands of jewels from Lanka, which were adorned in its illuminated house. In its bonds, some kilograms of gold and silver coins, as well as earrings, jewels, trumpets and drums torn from defeated kings across India’s southern coast, making the king the richest person of the time.

He was called Raja-Raja, King of Kings, and he belonged to one of the most remarkable kingdoms of the mediaeval world: the Cholas.

His family altered how the mediaeval world operated, but they are generally unfamiliar outside of India.

Getty Images Shiva as Lord of the Dance, Indian Bronze From Madras, (Chola Dynasty), 10th century. 69 cm high. At Victoria and Albert Museum. LondonArtist Unknown. Getty Images

Prior to the 11th Century, the Cholas had been one among the many fighting power that dotted the Kaveri floodplain, the wonderful system of sand that flows through India’s present-day state of Tamil Nadu. However, what made the Cholas unique was their unending ability for development. By the standards of the feudal earth, Chola queens were likewise extremely popular, serving as the kingdom’s people face.

Travelling to Tamil villages and rebuilding little, old mud-brick shrines in gleaming marble, the Chola duchess Sembiyan Mahadevi – Rajaraja’s great-aunt – properly “rebranded” the home as the main devotees of Shiva, winning them a favorite next.

Sembiyan prayed to Nataraja, a societies little-known variety of Hindu god Shiva as the King of Dance, and all her churches featured him strongly. The pattern persisted. Now, Nataraja is one of Hinduism’s most recognizable images. Nataraja was, however, actually a Cholas mark in the feudal American mind.

With one notable change, the king Rajaraja Chola shared his great-aunt’s love for public relationships and passion.

Rajaraja was even a king. He led his forces over the Western Ghats, a range of hills that protect India’s west coast, in the 990s, and burned the boats of his enemies while they were in interface. Then, he used the inner strife of the island of Lanka to create a Chola outpost that, becoming the first continent Indian king to establish a sustained presence there. Finally, he finally broke into the steep Deccan Plateau, which is where Germany meets Italy on the Tamil coast, and seized a piece of it for himself.

Getty Images Gingee Fort or Senji Fort (also known as Chenji, Jinji or Senchi) in Tamil Nadu, was originally the site of a small fort built by the Chola dynasty during the 9th century CE. The fort was modified by Kurumbar during the 13th century. The fort as it stands today was built in the 15 and 16th centuries by the Nayak Dynasty. The fort passed variously to the Marathas under the leadership of Shivaji in 1677 CE, the Bijapur sultans, the Moghuls, Carnatic Nawabs, the French and then the British in 1761.Getty Images

The treasure of conquest was lavished on his excellent royal church, known now as the Brihadishvara.

In addition to its precious treasures, the great church received 5, 000 tonnes of wheat annually, from conquered province across southern India (you’d have a fleet of twelve Airbus A380s to have that much grain now ).

This allowed the Brihadishvara to function as a mega-ministry of public works and welfare, an instrument of the Chola state, intended to channel Rajaraja’s vast fortunes into new irrigation systems, into expanding cultivation, into vast new herds of sheep and buffalo. Few nations on earth could have imagined economic control on such a large and deep scale.

The Cholas were just as significant to inner Eurasia as the Mongols were to the Indian Ocean. Rajaja Chola’s successor, Rajendra, established alliances with Tamil merchant banks, a partnership between traders and the government that foreshadowed the East India Company, a powerful British trading company that later oversaw large parts of India, that was to follow more than 700 years later.

In 1026, Rajendra sacked Kedah, a Malay city that dominated the world trade in priceless woods and spices, by placing his troops on merchant ships.

While some Indian nationalists have proclaimed this to be a Chola” conquest” or” colonisation” in Southeast Asia, archaeology suggests a stranger picture: the Cholas didn’t seem to have a navy of their own, but under them, a wave of Tamil diaspora merchants spread across the Bay of Bengal.

By the late 11th Century, these merchants ran independent ports in northern Sumatra. A century later, they were deep in present-day Myanmar and Thailand, and worked as tax collectors in Java.

AFP Brihadishwara Temple in Thanjavur, built during the 11th century AD by king Rajaraja Chola I of the Chola Empire. The temple was classified as a World Heritage Site by Unesco on July 12, 2016 in Tamil Nadu, IndiaAFP

In the Mongol-ruled China in the 13th century, Tamil merchants operated successful businesses in the port of Quanzhou and even constructed a temple to Shiva on the coast of the East China Sea. It was no coincidence that Tamils made up the majority of Indian administrators and workers in Southeast Asia during the British Raj in the 19th century.

South India, which was the nexus of planetary trade networks, was transformed by Chola-ruled India thanks to globalization and conquests.

Chola aristocrats poured war-loot into a wave of new temples that sourced fine goods from a truly global economy that connects the world’s furthest shores with Asia and Europe. Egypt, or perhaps even Spain, supplied copper and tin for their bronzes. Sumatra and Borneo were the sources of the gods ‘ sandalwood and camphor.

Tamil temples developed into enormous complexes and public spaces, which were surrounded by markets and had rice-estates. In the Chola capital region on the Kaveri, corresponding to the present-day city of Kumbakonam, a constellation of a dozen temple-towns supported populations of tens of thousands, possibly outclassing most cities in Europe at the time.

These Chola cities had an astonishing diversity of religions and were rife with Bengali tantric masters who traded with Lankan Muslims and Chinese Buddhists who rubbed shoulders with Tunisian Jews. Today the state of Tamil Nadu is one of India’s most urbanised. Many of the state’s towns grew around Chola-period shrines and markets.

Getty Images Annamalaiyar Temple is a Hindu temple dedicated to the god Shiva. The present structure was built during the Chola dynasty in the 9th Century, while later expansions are attributed to Vijayanagar rulers of the Sangama Dynasty (1336-1485 CE), the Saluva Dynasty and the Tuluva Dynasty (1491-1570 CE).Getty Images

These changes in urbanism and architecture were found in literature and art alike.

The artists ‘ appreciation of the human figure rivals Michelangelo or Donatello in the production of medieval Tamil metalwork for Chola-period temples, which is perhaps the finest ever produced by human hands. To praise Chola kings and adore the gods, Tamil poets developed notions of sainthood, history and even magical realism. If the Renaissance had taken place in south India 300 years before its time, you would get what you would get.

It is not a coincidence that Nataraja bronzes, especially Chola bronzes, can be found in the majority of the most significant Western museum collections. They are the remnants of a period of brilliant political developments, of maritime expeditions that spanned the globe, of titanic shrines and incredible wealth, of merchants, rulers, and artists who have shaped the world we live in today.

Anirudh Kanisetti is an Indian writer and author, most recently of Lords of Earth And Sea : A History of The Chola Empire

Continue Reading

Beijing calls Biden a ‘liar’ and says hello to Trump – Asia Times

After incoming US President Joe Biden’s current moves to enact a stronger trade restrictions against China, Beijing has launched fierce protests against the US. &nbsp,

Biden made three significant goes against China during the last year before handing his control to Republican President-elect Donald Trump on January 20.

While China’s Foreign Ministry criticized Biden for failing to “have a correct strategy perception and match words with actions”, Chinese media and commentators directly called Biden a “liar” and a “villain” .&nbsp, &nbsp,

The state-owned China Daily reported in an editor on January 15 that the Biden presidency has been taking the last few times before it leaves business to significantly worsen for blind economic abuse and coercion.

President Biden proclaimed from his first day in office that he would handle the country’s” complicated and significant relations with China” in a “responsible” manner, but over the past four years he has veered resolutely to a very careless way.

Meng Yan, a Shanxi-based military journalist, says in an article that Biden has” entirely torn off the face of dishonesty, revealed a violent encounter and stabbed China time and again since previous November”.

” We don’t need to explain how dishonest and obscene he was in the past.” His new behavior demonstrated that he did not possess kind deeds and thoughts,” Meng says. ” He is a villain”.

He claims that during this four-year name, Biden has broken his promise to stop fighting a “new Cold War” and overhaul China’s program.

Nevertheless, Chinese President Xi Jinping on January 17 held a phone call with Trump to discuss business, Taiwan and other problems, Xinhua reported.

Xi told Trump that it is obvious that China and the US, two main countries with different national circumstances, have some variations. He claimed that the secret to understanding each other’s main concerns and interests is to find the best ways to solve problems.

Trump stated in a post on Truth Social that” the visit was a very good one for both China and the USA.” I anticipate that we will work together and begin right away to address some issues.

He added:” We discussed balancing business, fentanyl, TikTok and many other topics. I pledge to make the world more quiet and secure under President Xi.

Biden’s last goes

Biden unveiled the regulatory framework on January 14 that did start limiting imports of British AI chips and models on January 31.

The regulatory model could:

  1. If high-end AI cards are sent to foreign countries outside of the US, US companies must qualify for trade licenses.
  2. If businesses want to buy US cards for their data centers, &nbsp, or other closely related countries, they must apply for validated end-user position.
  3. If closed-source AI models that have been trained on a high level of computing power ( more than 1026 operations ) are shipped to foreign countries, US companies are required to apply for export licenses. (” Open-weight” AI models allow developers to build upon and adapt previous work while” closed-source” AI models, such as ChatGPT, keep their code and training data confidential. ) &nbsp,

In brief, the US will allow unrestricted access to its high-end AI systems for America’s closest friends, cap the number of Artificial cards that can be exported to most places and forbid China, Russia, Iran and North Korea from obtaining the systems.

” This coverage will help develop a trusted technology habitat around the world and allow us to safeguard against the national security risks associated with AI,” said US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo. &nbsp,

With this guideline,” We’ve done that, and it will help protect the most cutting-edge AI systems and keep the benefits from our foreign opponents,” according to the statement.

This did not go over well in Beijing. In a press briefing on January 16, Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, stated that” the US keeps overstretching the concept of regional stability, politicizing and weaponizing commerce and technology issues, and using sanctions as a go-to tool.” What the US does is common abuse and economic force. China is deeply opposed to it and deplores it.

The most recent round of US chip restrictions, according to Sidley Austin LLP, differs from previous ones in many ways. &nbsp,

It said the biggest shifts of the US device restrictions apply to nations” in the middle,” those that are neither clear US friends nor obvious US enemies. Additionally, the US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security ( BIS ) chose to “regulate first, collect comments later” toward a significant revision of US export controls.

It claimed that the new regulations represent a significant change in how to control quantitative inputs for an AI concept itself.

ASML is affected

On April 1, the French authorities announced that it would change its regional trade power measure for advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment on January 15. It stated that more types of technology will be subject to a national authorization requirement as of that time.

Reinette Klever, the government’s foreign trade and development minister, claimed that the government had noticed increased security risks linked to the unrestricted export of chip-making equipment. &nbsp,

ASML, the world’s largest chip-making equipment maker, is expected to be hurt by the Dutch government’s latest decision. &nbsp,

Additionally, on January 15, the BIS made 25 Chinese companies and two Singapore-based companies members of its Entity List in two final rules. &nbsp,

It accused them of supporting China’s development of advanced weapons systems, weapons of mass destruction, and high-tech surveillance applications, as well as of supporting advanced AI research and development.

Among the sanctioned, Sophgo was accused by the US of having ordered AI chips from Taiwan’s TSMC for Huawei. &nbsp,

Yong Jian contributes to the Asia Times. He is a Chinese journalist who specializes in Chinese technology, economy and politics. &nbsp,

Read: Why China’s Ice Silk Road has Trump up in Arctic arms

Continue Reading

Bandwagon to get ancient temple Unesco status grows

Wat Phra Mahathat Woramahawihan in Nakhon Si Thammarat.
Wat Phra Mahathat Woramahawihan in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Woramahawihan.

The government is being prepared to consider to Natural Resources and Environment Minister Chalermchai Sri-on that Wat Phra Mahathat Woramahawihan in Nakhon Si Thammarat be given the support it needs to secure Unesco World Heritage position.

The Natural Resources and Environment Minister’s director Apichat Sakdiset announced on Friday that Mr. Chalermchai would send the request to the cupboard for concern on Tuesday.

The nomination was granted on January 15 by the National Committee on the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage ( WHC).

For the church to count for the 2025 large, he said, the standard documents must be submitted to the World Heritage Centre in Paris by February 1.

According to Mr. Apichat, the church, which was constructed in the 13th century CE, is a social identity blog that represents a notable change of spiritual traditions between Brahmin-Hindu, Mahayana Buddhism, and Theravada Buddhism in sea Southeast Asia.

The site has been a center for a special blend of different ideas for roughly 1,500 years, reflecting the powerful connection between the sacred place and the nearby communities.

The inclusion of the church on the preliminary list of ethnic heritage sites was approved by the World Heritage Committee in June 2013.

According to Mr. Apichat, relevant organizations have been actively promoting the Wat Phra Mahathat Woramahawihan’s designation as a World Heritage site for the past ten years.

The state will profit from the increase in cultural tourism, with 500-750 million baht projected to be generated periodically for the state, local communities, and tourism-related businesses once the church has World Heritage status.

Continue Reading

Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban in unanimous decision – Asia Times

The US Supreme Court on January 17, 2025, upheld a law requiring TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance, to buy the video game by January 19, 2025, or experience a global restrictions on the game. In a unanimous decision, the judge rejected TikTok’s say that the laws violates its First Amendment rights.

The court’s decision is the most recent development in a long story regarding the destiny of an app that is commonly used, particularly among young Americans, but which some politicians in Washington claim pose a security risk.

It’s unlikely that the story will finish with this decision. In the final days of his presidency, Vice President Joe Biden declared that he would not put the rules to the test. Donald Trump, the president-elect, apparently has an executive purchase in mind and plans to change the ban.

But why is TikTok provocative? Are the promises that it poses a threat to national security accurate? And what will the outcome of the case mean for free talk? The Conversation’s donors have been on finger to answer these questions.

1. An adviser for the Foreign government?

Lawmakers who wanted to outlaw TikTok or at least break its ties to China worry that the app will allow the Chinese Communist Party to affect Americans or use their information for deception. However, how much of an impact does TikTok have on the Chinese state? Shaomin Li, a professor of China’s social economy and firm at Old Dominion University, addresses that concern.

Li explains that the connection between TikTok, ByteDance, and the Chinese Communist Party is complex; rather, it isn’t just Beijing officials who instruct ByteDance to climb, and the parent company who controls how great its subsidiary did move. Instead, people are subject to a certain obligation, as with all businesses in China, when it comes to advancing national objectives. In China, private corporations, such as ByteDance, operate as joint initiatives with the condition.

No matter whether ByteDance has formal ties to the group, there will be the implicit understanding that the administration is working for two managers: the company’s traders and, more important, their political advisors who represent the party, Li writes. ” But most important, when the passions of the two leaders issue, the party surpasses”.

2. Using customer data to extract it

The dangers that TikTok poses to US customers are similar to those that plague many well-known programs, in particular because it gathers information about you. ByteDance and any other person who has or obtains access to that data, including contact details and website checking, as well as all of the data you post and send via the app.

According to Doug Jacobson, a scholar in security at Iowa State University, US politicians and officials are concerned that TikTok user information could be used by the Chinese state to spy on Americans. Government thieves might be able to swindle people into revealing more private information using the TikTok data.

But if the goal is to counter Chinese thieves, banning TikTok is likely to show too much, too soon. According to Jacobson,” the Chinese state has previously collected personal information from at least 80 % of the US population through several means.” The Chinese authorities even has access to the huge market for personal data, along with anyone else who has money.

3. The security risks associated with a moratorium

By outlawing TikTok, it might also produce American people more vulnerable to hackers of all kinds. Robert Olson, a researcher at the Rochester Institute of Technology, claims that many of the 170 million users of TikTok may try to circumvent a ban on the app, which would have adverse effects on their online safety.

If TikTok ends up banned from Apple’s and Google’s app stores, people may try to access the software somewhere via learned. Users are now more susceptible to infection that purports to be the TikTok application thanks to this maneuvering around the Apple and Google application stores. In order to keep the software installed, TikTok people might also be motivated to avoid Apple and Google safety measures, which may increase the vulnerability of their phones.

” I find it unlikely that a TikTok ban]is ] technologically enforceable”, Olson writes. This legislation, which aims to improve cybersecurity, may inspire users to engage in riskier online behavior.

4. First Amendment issues

ByteDance filed a constitutional challenge to the US government, alleging that it is violating First Amendment right. ByteDance had basis for its state, according to Georgetown University scholars Anupam Chander and Gautam Hans of Cornell University, and the implications extend beyond this situation.

TikTok is a publisher of people ‘ videos online. According to Chander and Hans, forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok is a form of due caution, the government preventing talk from occurring.

Congress’s goal with the laws is to change the nature of the platform, they write,” by forcibly selling TikTok to an object without any connections to the Chinese Communist Party.” That kind of government activity raises one of the main issues that the First Amendment was intended to shield from: state intervention in private party statement.

5. What about the others?

The forced sale to a US-based company or the ban of TikTok in the US are, according to Arizona State advertising professor Sarah Florini, a dubious approach to solving the issues the law aims to address: possible Chinese government control in the US, damage to teenagers, and data privacy violations.

The Chinese government and other US adversaries have long attempted to influence American public opinion through social media apps owned by US companies. The Facebook whistleblower case clearly demonstrated how dangerous Teens are to teens. And on the open and black markets, a lot of Americans ‘ personal data is already accessible to any buyer.

” Concerns about TikTok are not unfounded, but they are also not unique. According to Florini, US-based social media has been posing threats like TikTok has for more than ten years.

This is a revised version of an article that was first published on September 16, 2024.

The Conversation’s science and technology editor is Matt Williams, and it has two senior international editors.

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Three-airport rail link work ‘could start in April’

According to negotiations over a contract with a CP-led collaboration, the project is five years behind schedule.

An artist’s rendering shows a station for the planned high-speed rail line linking three airports including U-tapao in the Eastern Economic Corridor.
The anticipated high-speed rail line connecting three terminals, including U-tapao, is depicted in an artist’s rendering of a place in the Eastern Economic Corridor.

If changes to the consortium’s contract are approved, work on the long-delayed three-airport rail link could start in April, according to the Eastern Economic Corridor ( EEC ) Policy Committee.

A recent gathering of the commission, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Pichai Chunhavajira, reviewed plans to update the deal for the high-speed rail project linking Don Mueang, Suvarnabhumi and U-tapao flights.

The amended contract is being drafted by the State Railway of Thailand ( SRT), which will then be submitted for approval to the EEC Policy Committee and the cabinet.

Building may take five years to complete, with an expected beginning in 2029, five years behind schedule.

The SRT and Asia Era One, a consortium led by the Charoen Pokphand ( CP ) Group, signed the original contract in 2019. Part of the joint investment plan was a concession agreement to run the Bangkok Airport Rail Link ( ARL ).

During the Covid-19 crisis, however, declining customer figures on the ARL prompted Asia Era One to demand payment. In 2021, the government approved the contract’s correction.

Suriya Jungrungreangkit, the chancellor of transportation, refuted opposition claims that the deal adjustments favor private sector partners.

The SRT stated last month that, if the company is unable to finish the project, it would be willing to take over the entire venture.

The EEC Policy Committee, however, has approved the development of the Eastern Aviation City initiative which even includes U-tapao Airport. For the initiative, an extra 714 ray of land under the control of the Royal Thai Navy likely be provided.

According to Mr. Pichai, the expansion is intended to accommodate a second airport in order to meet aircraft safety requirements and prevent normal obstacles northern of the project area, including mountains.

The Eastern Economic Corridor of Innovation ( EECi)’s land-use plan will also be updated to allow for extracurricular activities like commercial production beyond prototype development. About 975 ray out of the 3, 454 ray allotted to work will be taken up by the gateway, he said.

The primary targets will be the current automotive, wise electronics and bio-agriculture industries. The changes are intended to boost regional economies, promote transfer of technology, and raise people ‘ quality of life.

Another plan approved in the conference was Blue Tech City, a 1, 172-rai exclusive economic territory in Chachoengsao. This professional zone will help advanced sectors such as electric vehicles, bright electronics, aircraft and digital technologies.

The project is anticipated to make 20 000 jobs and get funding worth 156 billion baht. Home businesses would be able to provide support for local entrepreneurs in obtaining 90 % of all electrical components and auto parts needed for EV production in the area.

Continue Reading

Why Malaysia-led ASEAN could go toe to toe with Trump – Asia Times

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN ) and its position in the world security spotlight will have a significant impact on the year ahead due to Donald Trump’s resumption of office and the growing superpower conflict in the Indo-Pacific.

Pete Hegseth, the nomination for Trump’s defence minister, received mockery in the region for not mentioning an ASEAN member at his verification hearing this week.

But the apparent cluelessness of the Pentagon’s inbound chief just underscores ASEAN’s growing political irrelevance among Washington’s proper aristocracy.

The following Trump administration, which is reportedly rife with China hawks, is expected to put mounting pressure on local nations to do the same or face Washington’s indignation. Among them will be coming Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Undersecretary for Policy Elbridge Colby.

As a result, ASEAN will increasingly challenge to successfully “hedge” between rival countries as both the US and China try to take advantage of the crucial and strategic area.

That puts Malaysia, this year’s circular seat of the local bloc, in the political heated seats. Amran Mohamed Zin, secretary-general of Malaysia’s foreign government, said there will be 357 ASEAN-related conferences, including 14 high-level sessions featuring heads of government and position, this year.

The ASEAN Foreign Ministers ‘ Retreat in Langkawi, gathering more than 200 international members and officials this trip, will formally launch Malaysia’s ASEAN chair.

Although the local system operates on a consensus-based decision-making mode, ASEAN’s rotary head has great impact in terms of shaping its agenda and policy direction.

The president may issue an independent” Chairman’s Declaration” whenever there is disagreement or hostility over a contentious regional problem, as evidenced by the ongoing civil unrest in Myanmar.

Malaysia chose” Inclusivity and Sustainability” for this year’s design, underscoring the importance of trade, investment and financial problems for the local system.

Prior to the end of the 2025 year, ASEAN leaders were confident enough to establish a local popular market that would serve as the foundation of regional stability throughout the 21st century.

Actually, Malaysia’s chairmanship this year widely echoes like aspirations despite remarkable changes in the local geopolitical, geo-economic and worldwide trade landscapes.

We must set the proper priorities with specific milestones, and be optimistic. What we want to deliver must create value”, said ASEAN Business Advisory Council ( BAC ) Malaysia chairman Tan Sri Nazir Razak&nbsp, during the ASEAN Economic Opinion Leaders Conference: Outlook for 2025.

” Another idea is the notion of an ASEAN business entity, a more complex, more contentious, but I think it could be the single-biggest move forward in ASEAN business…This initiative would bring our markets closer together, and I believe it could be very productive”, he added during the event hosted by Malaysia’s Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry ( MITI ) earlier this month.

Crucially, the popular Indonesian firm chief emphasized the value of political “neutrality” and also praised the “decoupling” between the US and China as a chance for ASEAN states to maximize investment from competing wonderful powers.

Earlier, popular Malaysian political scientist&nbsp, Cheng-Chwee Kuik argued&nbsp, along similar lines by insisting that the best course of action for ASEAN claims is to “hedge” their stakes and, consequently, reject position with any of the nations. &nbsp,

” Hedging is about reducing risks and for us here in ASEAN, it is essential… Hedging is a product of uncertainty. You may gain some and you may lose some, but no one does it because of naivety”, he said during the same conference.

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, however, has stretched the notion of ASEAN “hedging”. On the one hand, he has largely avoided criticizing China on important issues, including those involving the South China Sea disputes. &nbsp,

When asked about China and the Philippines ‘ ongoing maritime disputes, Anwar said,” There should be no involvement of other parties because it would ( then ) be deemed more complex and will complicate the matter.”

We ( Malaysia ) engage diplomatically in a more aggressive manner, and I think that’s pretty effective. There have been some very serious issues, too, with Malaysia, but we have been relatively more successful in that regard. When asked about the Philippines ‘ growing security cooperation with Western partners to stop China, Anwar said,” We are deemed to be really neutral in the engagement.

Anwar has increased his criticism of the West in addition to declining to stand in solidarity with the neighboring Philippines. Throughout the past year, he has accused Western nations of “hypocrisy” on the Gaza conflict as well as” Sinophobia”.

” We do not want to be dictated]to] by any force. Therefore, while we are still close friends with the United States or Europe and here in Australia, they should not prevent us from interacting with China, one of our most important neighbors. That was the context. And if China has problems, they shouldn’t force it on us,” he said to the Australian media at the ASEAN-Australia Summit last year. ” China is not a problem for us.” So, that’s why I referred to the issue of China-phobia in the West”.

Meanwhile, Anwar has actively promoted China&nbsp, as an indispensable partner for regional development. After all, Malaysia has been a major beneficiary of a massive influx of foreign investments, including from China. And with the Southeast Asian nation on the cusp of achieving the&nbsp, much-vaunted “high-income” status, Anwar has every reason not to rock the boat at ASEAN this year.

The incoming Trump administration, however, will likely have little patience for ASEAN dithering or any hint of China-friendly opportunism dressed up as diplomatic “hedging”. Hegseth made it clear that China is “front and center” among the US’s threats to China during his confirmation hearing for the defense secretary position.

In his opening remarks, Hegseth emphasized the need for strengthening deterrence and, accordingly, working with key regional allies and partners to check China’s assertiveness in adjacent waters.

He also criticized the incoming Biden administration for not moving the country’s strategic focus away from traditional theaters like Europe and the Middle East in favor of a China-focused Indo-Pacific strategy.

Senator Marco Rubio also addressed China during his confirmation hearing as secretary of state, urging the Asian superpower to stop “messer with Taiwan and the Philippines because it’s forcing us to concentrate our attention in ways we prefer not to have to do.”

” I think that’s critical, not just to defending Taiwan ( but ) to preventing a cataclysmic military intervention in the Indo-Pacific”, Rubio told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during a five-hour-long hearing. &nbsp,

Rubio emphasized the importance of reestablishing” a proper geopolitical balance between the United States and China” as a major thrust of the incoming Trump administration’s foreign policy.

The first Trump administration publicly opposed any major decisions by the regional body that might support China’s revisionist objectives despite having ASEAN as a key partner.

For instance, former USNNSA advisor John Bolton publicly warned ASEAN against any regional code of conduct that would impose restrictions on American military proxies and legitimize China’s extensive maritime claims in violation of international law.

A second Trump administration’s willingness to tolerate inaction or dithering from an even more powerful and influential China will likely set the stage for potentially contentious diplomatic relations with the regional bloc and its Beijing-friendly and outspoken chairman Anwar.

Follow Richard Javad Heydarian on X at @Rich Heydarian

Continue Reading

Han Zheng: The Chinese leader attending Trump’s inauguration?

The first time a top Chinese leader will see a US senator sworn in is when Vice-President Han Zheng attends Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday.

Trump had invited Xi Jinping, the president of China, among other officials, breaking with tradition because foreigners have typically not attended US national inaugurations.

China has stated that it wants to “find the right way for the two places to get along with each other in the fresh era” working with the new US administration.

But Beijing is also preparing for a Trump presidency that is expected to include new tariffs on Chinese-made imports and more combative rhetoric – Marco Rubio, the nominee for Secretary of State, has described China as “the largest, most advanced adversary America has ever faced”.

As leader, Xi has not attended an opening or crown service, choosing instead to give a consultant on his behalf. The Chinese embassy to the US attended the next two national ceremonies, in 2017 and 2021.

Beijing has sent vice-presidents to like ceremonies somewhere, though- Han attended Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s opening in October 2023. And his father, Wang Qishan, was manifest for the commencement of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr in 2022 and Brazil’s President Lula da Silva in 2023.

Han’s relocation to the US is a signal that Xi wants to “get Trump into deal-making function,” according to Neil Thomas, a colleague in Taiwanese politics at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

Argentine President Javier Milei and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni are among the different foreign officials who have been invited to the opening.

Karoline Leavitt, a spokesman for Trump, stated in a statement to US press that the proposal to Xi represented an “example of Trump engaging with leaders of nations that are not just our friends but also our adversaries and our competitors.”

Yun Sun, the chairman of the China system at the Stimson Center in Washington, claims that Trump may be trying to show the world that he has the ability to control Xi’s decision-making and that they share a special relationship.

Cai Qi was reported to be wanted by some Trump advisers, according to earlier information. Commonly seen as Xi’s right-hand person, 66-year-old Cai sits on the Communist Party’s seven-man Politburo Standing Committee, China’s relative of a case.

According to an unnamed insider, Trump would be “unhappy” if Han or [ Foreign Minister ] Wang Yi were the only Chinese envoys present. These assertions cannot be verified by the BBC.

But as vice-president, 70-year-old Han occupies a “very top position in the Chinese state program” and the decision to send him “accords kindness to Trump”, says Chong Ja-Ian, a non-resident professor at Carnegie China.

Han, who was appointed vice-president in March 2023, is known as “number eight”- the most mature chief after the seven people in the Politburo Standing Committee.

Han too had been a member until October 2022, when Xi began a historic third term in power and appointed his most trusted deputies to the top jobs.

Prior to that, Han lived in Shanghai, where he was born, for the majority of his political job. He became Xi’s secretary in Shanghai in 2007 before assuming the position himself in 2012 when the latter was the gathering director.

European politics has been a crucial focus for him in his tenure as vice-president. He oversaw a steering committee for the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing and led a group to market the Belt and Road initiative, a crucial Chinese industry and network project.

However, Beijing’s decision to send Han may have been influenced by his absence from the Politburo Standing Committee.

Xi and the group will be able to demonstrate that they kept a certain distance from Trump, according to Prof. Chong, when US-China relations start todeteriorate from the group’s standpoint.

Additionally, it is helpful that Han is not viewed as a member of Xi’s inside group, according to Mr. Thomas.

Han is certainly a key supporter and could be properly blamed if it goes painfully wrong, but Xi trusts Han enough to carry out this goal.

Further Reporting by BBC Monitoring’s Ian Tang

Continue Reading

US, China and Diego Garcia’s suddenly uncertain future – Asia Times

What might seem like the end of the last vestiges of European colonization in the Indian Ocean region could well be the start of growing tension between the United States, India, and China.

The British Indian Ocean Territory, which once belonged to Mauritius, will now become a part of the United Kingdom and Mauritius as a result of an agreement reached next October.

Navin Ramgoolam, the newly elected Mauritius government, ordered a review of the contract a month after because it did not provide enough compensation for the island’s unique inhabitants who had been forced to flee.

The Chagos Archipelago’s seven islands split from Mauritius in 1965, and Diego Garcia, the largest of them, was leased to the United States to building a significant, covert military center in the Indian Ocean.

However, the transfer is certain to occur, and it is already thought to be possible to convert the sun-soaked archipelago into a holiday destination similar to the Maldives, which is located about 500 kilometers away.

It’s possible to construct lavish hotels that will draw in high-spending travelers from all over the world. Diving, searching and so-called “eco-friendly” actions are already being touted on life sites referring to the Chagos Archipelago as a “new Island”.

But here lies the geostrategic issue. The UK has pledged to support Mauritius financially in order to build the islands, including a partnership to develop desperately needed infrastructure.

But, because Mauritius is a sovereign nation, it is difficult to think that China will not attempt to finance its own projects on the island, not just because Beijing wants to make the islands an appealing place for Chinese visitors.

That is exactly what has happened in the Island, where Chinese tourists are at the top of tourist arrivals names. China has made significant investments in developing facilities, including a bridge that connects the territories of Hulhule and Hulhumale with Male, the country’s capital. That building has sown political sway, which worries India, the Maldives ‘ traditional development companion and strategic alliance, for the long-term.

Because it lies along the ocean corridors through which its imported oil from the Persian Gulf walks, the Island is carefully essential to China.

With relatively innocent purchase projects, China would have a unique opportunity to observe US defense activities at Diego Garcia.

Diego Garcia would be very important in America’s security of its passions in the Indian Ocean and beyond in the event of a future fight, including a potential military conflict between the United States and China.

China, on the other hand, is&nbsp, rapidly expanding its political and economic, and thus also proper, effect in the Indian Ocean at the cost of the United States and India. And that is why alarms bells are ringing in Washington. &nbsp,

Republican US lawmakers criticized the American authorities for ceding control of the Chagos Archipelago after the deal was announced in October, warning that it would be” a revolution for Chinese interests.”

Rep. Michael McCaul, a member from Texas, and Idaho Senator James Risch, a senior part of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, were two of the people who spoke with them. These problems may become more vocal among the numerous well-known China eagles in his Cabinet as Republican Donald Trump approaches the White House.

According to the preliminary Britain-Mauritius agreement, the United States may keep control of Diego Garcia for 99 decades after the transfer.

However, there are already some parallels between Britain’s 1997 transfer agreement with China on Hong Kong, where Beijing pledged to uphold the rule of “one country, two systems” for 50 years before breaking the deal by enraging the once independent English town under its autocratic rule.

To be sure, Mauritius is not China. More than half of the island republic’s population is a product of indentured laborers hired by the British during the colonial era to work on sugar plantations, so relations with India have always been friendly.

Fast forward to the present, as China’s influence expands in the Indian Ocean and Beijing can be seen clearly as a gateway to Africa, where its Belt and Road Initiative and various deals involving the extraction of various natural resources are growing.

Xi Jinping, the president of China, traveled to Mauritius in 2018. At a&nbsp, grand ceremony held in Xi ‘s&nbsp, honor, the Chinese leader said that&nbsp, he looked&nbsp, forward to exchanging views&nbsp, with Mauritius “on bilateral relations and on international and regional issues of mutual concern”.

The first African nation to sign a free trade agreement with China, which was signed in January 2021, was a year later, and it has since had a significant impact on China.

According to&nbsp, the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade, &nbsp, Mauritius’&nbsp, imports from China&nbsp, totaled&nbsp, US$ 993 million in&nbsp, 2023, &nbsp, while&nbsp, its exports to China, despite annual increases, &nbsp, amounted to&nbsp, a&nbsp, mere&nbsp,$ 26.32 million. &nbsp, China has also invested liberally in Mauritian finance, real estate, manufacturing and tourism.

That implies that Mauritius is becoming more and more diplomatically and economically connected to China, making it more profitable and diplomatically.

Outside powers have long sought after the Chagos Archipelago. When Maldivian and European seafarers visited the islands more than 500 years ago, it was uninhabited. The French brought in slaves from its possessions in the area and established coconut plantations on the larger islands.

In 1815, the British took control of the archipelago from Mauritius, the country’s former British colony. The British abolished slavery in 1840, but the coconut plantations remained. Prior to 1965, when Britain purchased the archipelago from Mauritius, the then-self-governing colony, nothing notable happened there.

Three years later, Mauritius was granted full independence from Britain, but with a significant caveat: The British insisted that it would not be able to secede from its territories. It eventually became known as the” British Indian Ocean Territory,” and it became clear why London pressed for the separation.

The agreement between Britain and the United States to convert Diego Garcia, the archipelago’s main island, into a formidable military base would leave the colonial state and give the country a lease on the land. At the same time, the entire population of the archipelago, then consisting of some 1, 000 people, was forcibly evicted and sent to Mauritius and the Seychelles.

Diego Garcia’s strategic location was obvious. It oversees vital shipping lines across the Indian Ocean and gives the US and UK access to East Africa, the Middle East, South and Southeast Asia in the event of war or another emergency.

Diego Garcia’s development was also in line with a brand-new US policy known as the” Strategic Islands Concept,” which prohibited military bases from being established close to the populous mainland areas where they could be exposed to anti-Western and anti-American opposition.

Diego Garcia was used to support US-led combat operations in Afghanistan and played an important role as a logistics base in both Gulf Wars in 1990 and 2003. More incontrovertibly, terrorist suspects who had been apprehended in Afghanistan and other locations were sent to Diego Garcia for a far-away “extraordinary rendition” ( extraordinary rendition ) treatment.

The original inhabitants of the archipelago, known as the Chagossians, have for years fought for the right to return home. These demands were repeatedly rejected by the British government.

However, an advisory from the International Court of Justice recommended returning the entire British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius in 2019. The Chagossians, now in second and third generations since their removal from the islands, are reputedly over 10, 000 in number.

The main issue is how Mauritius will govern the archipelago once it joins its republic, and how it will maintain a balance between its relations with China, the United States, and other Indian Ocean powers. Washington is concerned about Chinese expansion into the strategic and increasingly contentious maritime region, not just Washington.

India has always viewed the Indian Ocean as “its lake,” which is struggling to maintain good relations with the occasionally antagonistic Maldives and increasingly unpredictable Mauritius.

Anything can happen if the British leave their final possession “east of Suez,” as the saying goes. However, it would seem naive to assume that China will not attempt to influence the future of the Chagos Archipelago with its growing geostrategic interests in the Indian Ocean.

Bertil Lintner is a Thailand-based journalist, author and security analyst. His most recent book is” The Golden Land Ablaze: Coups, Insurgents and the State in Myanmar”, which can be purchased on Amazon here.

Continue Reading

Will Trump’s ‘Polar Pivot’ spark a superpower clash? – Asia Times

A” New Great Game” is emerging from Trump’s Greenland strategy, in which the ultimate strategic prize is command of this Arctic large.

This power struggle extends beyond land and ice to include essential raw materials, military supremacy, and shipping lanes in an exceedingly available polar region.

This automatic Danish province, which is not a member of the EU, has evolved from a distant island to the epicenter of contemporary geopolitical power as barriers fall. &nbsp,

Greenland is the world’s largest area, carefully located in the Arctic between America and Europe. Despite its small community of 57, 000, mostly Inuit, it holds huge political prominence due to its undiscovered energy potential, including oil, healthy gas, and essential minerals. Its close proximity to the developing transport routes in the Arctic and its position as a gateway for military operations and Arctic surveillance adds to its proper worth. &nbsp,

In 2019, former US President Donald Trump’s request to buy Greenland drew international interest, framing it as “essentially a huge real property deal”. Trump canceled a state visit to Copenhagen when Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen criticized it as “absurd.”

His&nbsp, comment, including a post featuring a golden Trump Tower superimposed on a Greenlandic settlement with the message,” I promise not to do this to Greenland”! were broadly mocked.

However, these remarks highlighted deeper US proper emotions. Greenland has become a political prize thanks to its Pituffik Space Base remaining a key component of America’s ballistic missile early-warning program and area surveillance. &nbsp,

Trump’s renewed force highlights growing US concerns about Russian and Chinese Arctic effect. The automatic Greenlandic state ‘s&nbsp, interest&nbsp, in assistance with China, particularly in mine jobs, coupled with Russia’s military build-up in the region, has intensified US necessity to strengthen its relationship.

However, the Swedish authorities seemed caught off guard by Trump’s claims, leading Frederiksen to rush for a good framing of the disagreement. &nbsp,

Additionally, he has repeatedly stated his interventionist goals within a month, including the restoration of the Panama Canal and the acquisition of Greenland in the current Trump 2.0 period, under the banner of MAGA. These claims are strengthened by his near-absolute power in this next term. &nbsp,

In a January 7th hit conference—a several days before his inauguration—he did not rule out the use of military or economic force to achieve his goal, &nbsp, claiming&nbsp, it as important:” People don’t even know if Denmark has any lawful right to it. But if they do, they may give it up … We need it for national safety”. On his social media platform, he&nbsp, insisted: &nbsp,

” the Free World, have safety, security, durability, and PEACE! This is a package that has happen” .&nbsp,

For China, a US appearance in Greenland threatens its Polar Silk Road initiative and supremacy in essential raw materials, necessary for advanced technology. Moreover, the Arctic’s warming climate could reduce transit times for Asian trade with Europe, making control over the region increasingly valuable. &nbsp,

Accordingly, three potential scenarios emerge. &nbsp,

First, the US could take a diplomatic approach offering Greenland financial incentives, development packages and autonomy guarantees. The difficulty would be persuading Greenlanders that integrating with Washington would result in long-term advantages while overcoming Denmark’s resistance, which is rooted in history, national pride, and strategic concerns.

This would stifle China’s access to vital minerals and halt its polar expansion, leading to Beijing’s desire to develop stronger ties with other Arctic countries, particularly Russia. &nbsp,

Second, the US might use increased investment and direct aid to counteract political pressure, potentially isolating Greenland from Denmark. Washington might also put political pressure on Copenhagen, implying that Nuuk’s support for NATO and the Arctic Council is essential, and that this would undermine Denmark’s ability to maintain control.

This ostensibly reflects China’s strategy of growing influence, but it also raises the possibility of alienating European allies. It may also lead Beijing to increase economic ties with local authorities and mobilize diplomatic opposition, thereby destabilizing Washington. &nbsp,

The US asserting de facto control over Greenland’s strategic resources or military infrastructure without formal acquisition, bypassing Denmark entirely, and even threatening economic repercussions if Copenhagen rejects an American diktat is the most aggressive scenario. &nbsp,

This is not unusual because the US has historically justified interventionist measures under the pretext of preserving regional stability. While the foundational&nbsp, Monroe Doctrine&nbsp, aimed to prevent European interference in the Americas, the Roosevelt Corollary expanded its scope, legitimizing US intervention in the Western Hemisphere to uphold stability or defend its interests.

Due to this history, US pressure on Greenland is seen as a comprehensive strategic plan to safeguard its sphere of influence as well as a territorial ambition. &nbsp,

However, this could trigger an international backlash, particularly from the EU, which would be legally obliged to respond to any sort of hostility or sanctions against Denmark, giving the EU anti-coercion instrument, therefore, unexpected importance.

Yet, based on recent developments in January 2025, the European Commission’s response to such threats—while it constantly criticizes China over matters that don’t directly affect Europe—exposes both weakness and a lack of clear strategy. &nbsp,

Another issue is China. It might interpret US pressure on Greenland in three ways: as a part of a larger geopolitical containment plan, as a claim of dominance that challenges Beijing’s growing global influence, and as a case study for limiting its ambitions in areas like the South China Sea.

Consequently, while adhering to its non-interference principle, China might weigh the strategic implications of US actions, treating them as part of a broader struggle for global primacy. &nbsp,

In response, China could pursue two approaches, having ruled out inaction. First, it might consider taking bold countermeasures, such as strengthening military and economic ties with Russia and bolstering local opposition in Greenland with financial aid and investments. This development is very uncomfortable and precarious for Denmark, a significant US ally. &nbsp,

A more assertive position, even though less probable, warrants consideration. While China might formally designate Greenland as a Danish internal issue in accordance with its non-interference policy, it may struggle to ignore US pressure on the country. If Beijing responded with a better economic offer, it would stoke a serious geopolitical conflict.

Denmark would likely decline an offer to preserve Western alliances, but Greenland’s response might be less nuanced if China promised substantial infrastructure development and respect for their sovereignty. &nbsp,

Any attempt by China to find alternative solutions to Greenland as a direct threat to its national security and Arctic dominance in the US would seem to be. Sanctions and an increase in military presence would be among the best means of stopping it, according to Washington.

China would be at risk for reputation because such a proposal could be viewed as neo-colonialialism, especially if it rejects the indigenous people’s wishes or undermines Danish sovereignty. Furthermore, Beijing would struggle to defend its position on sensitive issues like Tibet, Xinjiang and Taiwan, where it monitors any movements for independence. &nbsp,

Nevertheless, the temptation is hard to resist: strong Chinese involvement would mark a historic shift reaching beyond Arctic geopolitics, challenging Western dominance and potentially altering the Arctic Council’s power dynamics. Russia might initially be appreciative of this development, but it will become more wary of Beijing’s growing presence. &nbsp,

Regardless of the outcome, these scenarios underscore Greenland’s emergence as a pivotal flashpoint in the broader US-China rivalry. The Arctic is a center for strategic resources, shipping routes, and military positioning, which pushes superpowers against international law and creates a more contentious geopolitical debate. &nbsp,

Trump’s push for Greenland could mark his” Polar Pivot”, a counterpart to Obama’s Pivot to Asia, yet focused on Arctic ambitions. For those who doubted Trump’s foreign policy vision, his attempt to redefine the Roosevelt Corollary—draped in protectionism, isolationism, and nationalism—offers a clear rebuttal.

If successful, it might even earn the title of the” Trump Corollary”. His approach is far from foolish, revealing a deliberate geopolitical plan hidden beneath the surface of his real estate rhetoric.

Republished with the kind permission of China-US Focus, 2025 ( www. chinausfocus.com ). Read the orignal here.

Continue Reading