Sure A Not

Military analysts and others quickly compared the surprise attack on southern Israel by Islamic Resistance Movement ( Hamas ) gunmen to the Yom Kippur War of 1973, when Egyptian and Syrian armies invaded the nation.

However, there is another distinction that Israelis may prefer to forget in addition to the context of each discord. The Jewish government was aware that an intrusion was imminent in 1973, but it chose to disregard the instructions. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s present administration was unaware that Hamas, the Palestinian organization in charge of the Gaza Strip, was getting ready and capable of launching an invasion. & nbsp,

In the weeks and possibly years to come, the error will probably include a significant impact on the stability of the Middle East. As the vengeful angels of anti-Israel resistance, Hamas has solidified its position among some Palestinians and Arab communities at large. The Palestine Liberation Organization( PLO), which controls the West Bank but has watched helplessly as chaos engulfed Israel’s south, has fallen far behind it.

Additionally, Israel’s popularity as the Middle Eastern region with the most knowledge has been seriously damaged. Israel’s opinions that Hamas, a group that claims to want to abolish the Jewish state, had been subdued even turned out to be false.

This does not imply that Hamas will eventually achieve martial success. By defeating Hamas, Israel hopes to regain its storied local dominance. To do this, it is gathering thousands of soldiers for a floor offense. It is bombarding the packed Gaza area with hundreds of missiles every day in planning, destroying both skyscrapers and modest structures.

In order to force the Palestinians to leave, the government also announced on Monday( October 9) day that it would cut off supplies of food, light, energy, and water to the whole Gaza Strip.

It is likely that Hamas did had killed the notion that the Israeli-Palestinian issue may be put on a worldwide backshelf while the world focused on the war in Ukraine and escalating US-China competition, despite the folly of waging this battle.

Numerous gunmen, careful planning, and secrecy were needed for the Hamas abuse, qualities that Israeli warfare occasionally lacked. Also government officials were kept in the dark about the plans, with the exception of a few who were closest to Hamas’ top management.

Hamas used precise fraud to allay fears that it might be getting ready for war. Hundreds of Arab laborers will be permitted to work in Israel thanks to an agreement the firm reached with Israel. An Israeli national was cited as saying that Israel took that as evidence that Hamas was concentrated on resolving serious economic issues rather than military resistance.

Some of the weapons used in the assault, such as motorcycles, hang glider, civilian pick-up trucks, and tractors, were no components that raised Israeli alarm.

A well-planned war dancing surprised Israeli intelligence officials in addition to deception. One standard described the military collection as follows in an interview with Israeli tv:

1. missiles were first fired into Israel to cause confusion and panic.
2. blasting holes in the steel link landscaping along the Gaza border to allow motorcycle-riding guerrillas to enter Jewish territory, fire on locals and security personnel, and take hostages,
3. Bulldozers were used to create openings between Israeli border towns and farming communities that allowed delivery army trucks to pass through.
4. sending out militants to terrorize settlements and farms. ( Israel is still looking for some of them. )

The Israelis, perhaps out of arrogance, even disregarded a clear indication that something might be going on: the use of an Israeli settlement that was fully scaled out inside Gaza but was visible to all.

Iran played a significant function, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cited senior Hamas and Hezbollah leaders who have not been named. It claimed that Egyptian authorities had assisted in the attackers’ training and had met with Hamas representatives in Beirut on Monday to approve the assault.

The document also asserted that the step-by-step assault was planned with assistance from individuals of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an arm of Iran. The Biden presidency has not yet discovered any proof of strong Egyptian participation, according to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Terrorism was one aspect of the Hamas war that did follow a well-known style of Iran – Hezbollah combat actions. Hezbollah and Iran have both much engaged in hostage-taking. Hamas gathered more than 100 residents from an outside music festival and forced them into Gaza in an apparent attempt to outdo rivals. They will likely be used for slave markets if they survive.

The shooting incidents by Hamas of at least 260 Jewish spectators at the music event was the worst for crime in the protracted years of Arab fight with Israel, despite the fact that killing civilians was well-established among Arab opposition groups.

There won’t be any opposition from a frightened and enraged Jewish public because Netanyahu has promised to wipe out Hamas. But if he is successful, who may rule Gaza? Israel left the Gaza Strip in 2005 and demolished its 21 towns it. The PLO and Hamas fought over the country two years later. After winning, Hamas has ruled there ever since.

Some observers speculate that Israel may attempt to put the PLO in place. Israel inviting Muslim nations, possibly yet Saudi Arabia, to act as caretakers is one fantastic notion.

Israel left Gaza as a result of continuous shelling by wooden mortars, making it unlikely that it will resume its own occupation. Ambushes cost money to maintain its carry on Gaza.

Since then, there have been numerous Hamas-Israeli problems. Fighting can often stop immediately and other times it lasts until Israel’s main alliance, the US, demands an end.

The US has thus far backed Israel’s efforts to punish Hamas while acknowledging the harm it may cause to Gazans and the infrastructure of the enclave. Yet as Hamas is being destroyed, Israel may still be concerned that Washington’s compassion for dangerous retaliation may have its limits.

Perhaps for this reason, on Sunday, the first day following the start of the war, Israeli government media began to refer to Hamas’ invasion as Israel’s 9 / 11, attributing the atrocious event to the al-Qaeda passenger plane attacks on New York and Washington in 2001.

Reminding Americans of that incident and the outrage it caused might help them become more patient with Gaza’s unfavorable outcome. & nbsp,

Continue Reading

Mahmood Khan Achakzai, the leader of the Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party, vehemently criticized the idea of driving Afghan refugees out of Pakistan in front of a sizable public meeting in Quetta on Saturday.

Achakzai urged the government to rethink sending Afghan migrants back to Afghanistan because doing so would only heighten the already-present hostility between the two nations.

He also voiced his disapproval of Pashtun Afghans’ uncontrolled targeting, destruction of their identification cards, demands of gifts from police in Sindh and Punjab, and the imprisonment of Afghan citizens who had registered.

Due to this, interim Interior Minister Sarfraz Bugti issued a severe warning to Afghan refugees in Pakistan last Tuesday, pleading with them to depart by November 1. If they didn’t follow, their property may be seized and they would have to be forced to return to Afghanistan.

Bugti also threatened to run a DNA test on Afghans who have membership cards from Pakistan to verify their ancestry. This action, which aims to expel all Afghan refugees seeking asylum from the Taliban plan, has received defense support from Pakistan. & nbsp,

About 1.3 million Afghan refugees had been registered in Pakistan by the end of 2022, according to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees( UNHCR ). & nbsp,

Pakistan is home to nearly 1.6 million Afghan migrants who are not officially registered. Tens of thousands of them have applied for asylum in the US, the UK, and the EU through legal channels supported by the UNHCR company in Pakistan in an effort to find a better future. & nbsp,

The forced eviction of these refugees would undoubtedly harm Pakistan-Afghan relations and worsen Pakistan’s now precarious living situation as a result of the devastation caused by the war. Their current misery and suffering may be made worse by their driven return.

Pakistan would probably be unable to provide sufficient information due to poor accountability, problem, and a lack of transparency if the worldwide community demanded details of the more than US$ 300 million allocated for Afghan refugees between 2021 and 2022.

The pitiful condition of Afghans in refugee camps demonstrates that Pakistan doesn’t use even a one dollar of the above resources to enhance their standard of living. Biased and disparaging actions won’t help the Afghan refugees; rather, they’ll simply incite more hatred and hostility and fail to advance any significant security interests.

Political opponents are becoming more and more concerned about the plan to drive out illegal refugees, calling it a heartless and cruel action that will have big repercussions for Pakistan’s economic growth. They also claim that it will diminish Pakistan’s admittance to Central Asia, economic development, and cordial ties with neighboring nations, which is already a precarious relationship between Islamabad and Kabul.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, Afghanistan’s acting foreign secretary, has criticized the federal government of Pakistan for its choice, calling it a violation of UN resolutions and international law. He foresaw that the forced eviction would exacerbate hostilities between the two allying countries.

Unfortunately, Bugti claimed that Afghan refugees were behind bombings, violence, and posed a threat to Pakistan’s security.

Of the 24 criminal attacks in recent months, according to Bugti, 14 were carried out by Afghans. However, this assertion is both blatantly sad and propagandist.

Pakistan needs to investigate its unique home in order to organize things. Attacking Afghan refugees doesn’t help to hide security flaws, either. Afghans reside in more than 70 nations worldwide. No major error by Afghans has been reported by the US, UK, Canada, or EU.

Furthermore, it violates both Articles 9 and 14 ( 2 ) of the Pakistani Constitution as well as international law to force Afghan refugees to flee their homes. If the government takes this action, the Afghan government and its citizens properly perceive Pakistan’s behavior as a lack of empathy and support during tense times, according to eminently ruled Islamabad High Court that no one can be expelled with power who had” deliberately committed illegality.”

It is important to realize that the tense connection affects more than just the two of them. Particularly in the context of counterterrorism efforts, such as those aimed at Tehreek – e-Taliban and Pakistan as well as Islamic State-Khorasan Province( IS – KP ), it could jeopardize regional cooperation and stability. If the relocation process is handled incorrectly, Pakistan’s capacity to contribute positively and keep the region stable may be jeopardized.

Pakistan would likewise suffer financially as a result of the forced resettlement of Afghan immigrants. Since they arrived in Pakistan years ago, the economy has benefited greatly from the presence of Afghan refugees.

Afghan immigrants, in particular, have made contributions to Pakistan’s labour market in the areas of construction, agriculture, and unofficial companies. Their work and skills have filled monetary gaps in Pakistan, resulting in economic development and growth in some areas. Additionally, the presence of Armenian migrants has increased the demand for goods and services, which has benefited regional companies and boosted the economy.

Negotiation is required.

To solve the worries and issues facing the refugees, the governments of Pakistan and Afghanistan should have a creative conversation. Finding socially beneficial options that prioritize the rights and well-being of Afghan refugees while also addressing Pakistan’s security concerns should be the main topic of discussion. & nbsp,

The UN, US, EU, local organizations, and donor nations should actively support efforts to find a long-term answer to the Afghan refugee crisis. It wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say that more financial and technical support can help lessen some of the burdens on Pakistan’s business and public services.

The Pakistani authorities should concentrate on a volunteer program, ensuring that Afghan refugees have the option of returning to their home country or seeking asylum in another nations, rather than forced repatriation. The right and organization of the Afghan refugees are respected by this type of plan option. & nbsp,

Also, policies should be created to encourage the inclusion of Afghan refugees into nearby communities for those who choose to remain in Pakistan. The American nations have integrated millions of Pakistanis into their respective areas. Pakistan can even put this into practice by addressing legal and administrative obstacles to their participation as well as giving people access to opportunities for employment in the fields of education, health care, and employment.

A tense environment may be required between the two fast companions due to hostility. Otherwise, Pakistan and Afghanistan ought to develop a cordial alliance.

Continue Reading

A new nuclear-powered cruise missile, formally known as Burvestnik and referred to in information as” Flying Chernobyl,” has just been tested by Russia. It is a doom superweapon that was developed out of concern for losing nuclear balance with the US.

Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the powerful check at the Valdai Discussion Club’s annual meeting this month, according to The Warzone. He also asserted at the event that Russia is on the verge of fielding its most recent intercontinental ballistic missile ( ICBM ), known as the RS – 28 Sarmat, which has raised questions about a new arms race.

According to the Warzone review, Burevestnik, which Putin first unveiled in March 2018, has since undergone testing at a number of locations, including Pankovo in the Arctic Ocean. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Burevestnik is a nuclear-powered proper weapon with an unrestricted range that uses ramjet engines or nuclear thermal rockets as its main propulsion system.

The” Flying Chernobyl” title refers to the missile’s health problems, which include its transfer of nuclear material and the death of its atomic power supply after detonation.

Five weapons scientists were killed in a radioactivity release at the State Central Navy Testing Range in northern Russia in August 2019 by Rosatom & nbsp, the nuclear energy agency of Russia. This release was later connected to an accident involving the testing of an” isotope power source & nnpspe, for sa liquid-fueled rocket engine,” which resulted in their deaths.

Fellow Ankit Panda, a disarmament expert, Jeffrey Lewis, and the Federation of American Scientists, suspected the incident was the result of the Burevestnik test, though others have disputed that conclusion.

Putin recently suggested that life nuclear weapon testing may immediately resume in Russia, the US, and China. He also rejected the adoption of a fresh official nuclear weapons doctrine with lower requirements for employment. The Warzone claims that despite this, it is still unclear how the Burevestnik program will develop or whether the missile will actually be deployed.

Leah Walker claims that Russian concerns about US missile defence dating back to the Soviet Union and former US president Ronald Reagan’s support for the Strategic Defense Initiative were the driving forces behind the development of the Burevestnik in an article published in April 2020 in the peer-reviewed Journal of Science Policy and Governance.

Walker adds that more recent US initiatives, like the Conventional Prompt Strike( CPS ), have also raised Moscow’s nuclear alarm bells. Additionally, Russia may have been forced to speed up Burevestnik-related testing as a result of recent confirmed progress on America’s prototype nuclear-tipped AGM-181A Long Range Stand Off( LRSO ) cruise missile.

In order to strengthen its air-based nuclear deterrent against new threats from China and Russia, Asia Times reported on US testing of the AGM-181A LRSO this quarter. The Long Range Strike family’s AGM – 181A LRSO has successfully completed nine significant trip tests, demonstrating its large resilience with a subtle airframe.

Additionally, the US missile reportedly underwent four powered flight tests, one of which was a Controlled Test Mission ( CTM – 1 ) test. The US’s retrenchment of its atomic army following the previous Cold War does require the AGM – 181A LRSO to close a perceived nuclear deterrence space.

China and Russia, near-peer rivals, have continued to develop tactical nuclear weapons at the same time. The creation of the AGM-181A LRSO could result in a proportionate nuclear answer from China and Russia, leading to proper cooperation to build up their respective nuclear arsenals and rekindling the US and China’s nuclear arms race.

The US and Soviet Union looked into design nuclear-powered ramjets for use in tactical bombers and long-range weapons during the Cold War to extend the reach collection of their airpower. More energy was needed at longer ranges, which in turn required larger aircraft. But, nuclear-powered ramjets were seen as an alternative to creating larger aircraft.

They operate manually by introducing cold air from the front, heating it up over a nuclear reactor, and exhaling it to generate thrust. An aeroplane or missile may be powered by such an engine for days or even weeks.

Due to technical, protection, and operational issues, nuclear-powered plane and missile designs were not operationalized despite those developed by the US and the former Soviet Union.

Leah points out that the design of Burevestnik is comparable to the top-secret Project Pluto’s 1960s US Supersonic Low Altitude Missile( SLAM ), which sought to create a nuclear-powered cruise missile.

She points out that in the worst-case situation, SLAM, which can transport 14 to 26 nuclear weapons, would have been employed. Leah mentions that the US tested a working nuclear ramjet website in 1961, but it decided to abandon the project due to the dangers involved, including the potential for weapon launch.

Leah lists many difficulties in creating such a weapon. She points out that a small nuclear reactor that can survive the stresses of an air weapon must deal with intense pressure variations over the reactor’s body, extremely high temperatures required for the atomic reaction, and swift heat loss due to air stream cooling.

She notes that Project Pluto designed and constructed a 500 watt nuclear boiler that could survive warmth of more than 1, 371 degrees Celsius in order to meet these requirements.

Leah claims that in a sophisticated, strongly coupled, small-scale program, there is no way to reduce operating accidents. She also points out that despite the system’s propensity for accidents, any shutdown would probably never be considered a problem if it happened on enemy place because its failure could be just as disastrous for the adversary as its success.

Leah adds that operating a distribution system that doubles as an underground bomb poses an inherent risk and raises questions about nuclear proliferation. She points out that it would have a significant impact on the population and environment of the world if other nations pursued these weapons to keep nuclear parity with their peers.

She points out that a missile test would quickly have the same effects as an nuclear check if testing even one of these weapons results in ample damage and causing an explosion of the missile’s reactor.

The Burevestnik is a member of Russia’s” superweapon” family, and it is intended to demonstrate and highlight its military and technological prowess while also bringing mutually assured destruction( MAD ) to its enemies.

Richard Conolly notes that the Burevestnik, along with the RS-28 Sarmat ICBM, Avangard, Kinzhal, and Tsirkon fast missiles, as well as the Poseidon nuclear missile, were created in September 2021 for Chatham House in order to keep US corporate balance, breach US missile defenses and serve as leverage in upcoming arms control negotiations.

Conolly points out that Russia created these superweapons in response to concerns about an abrupt and significant US naval and air blitzkrieg. Their combined ability to support conventional or nuclear weapons gave Moscow a wider range of revenge options.

Conolly asserts that while the superweapons significantly enhance Russia’s military nuclear and conventional hit capabilities, they do not significantly alter its proper nuclear capability.

According to some estimates, it may take 15 to 20 times to restore Russia’s regular military features, which have been damaged in Ukraine. Russia does be forced to concentrate more on asymmetrical tactics in its ongoing conflict with the West as restrictions continue to deplete its economy and defence sector.

Disinformation, attacks, and lowering the bar for using tactical nuclear weapons like the Burevestnik are examples of such symmetric methods.

Continue Reading