Sure A Not

In order to stop the Chinese tech giant from gaining access to device production resources and chip design tools, US Republican lawmakers are urging the Biden administration to tighten its sanctions against Huawei and SMIC. & nbsp,

US House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul and House Select Committee on China Chairman Mike Gallagher demanded” full limiting” restrictions against Huawei after US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said on October 4 that reports of Huawei’s most recent 7-nanometer device find were” very troubling.” & nbsp,

The Bureau of Industry and Security ( BIS ) of the Commerce Department, according to a letter to National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan,” does not understand China’s industrial policy, does not comprehend Chinese military goals, and has no understanding of technology at all— and has not the will to act.”

The BIS” has been enabling SMIC’s increase for more than ten years ,” they claimed,” from granting end-user status that was validated by SMI in 2007 to decontrolling device production equipment, including printing devices, in 2015 to a licensing scheme that is riddled with loopholes in 2020.”

Additionally, McCaul and Gallagher asserted that the BIS may prevent Chinese businesses from evading US export control regulations announced on October 7, 2022, as well as entity listings that make the delivery of cloud computing content to licensing requirements. & nbsp,

An updated law limiting the exports of US chip-making tools to China is in the final phases of review, according to Reuters, which reported on October 6. A restriction titled” Export controls to Semiconductor Manufacturing Items, Entity List Modifications” was posted on the Office of Management and Budget’s( OMB ) webpage on October 4 as a preview of the upcoming changes.

Previous leaders were cited by Reuters as saying that trade control laws are typically not posted by OMB until there is agreement on their content between the Departments of State, Defense, Commerce, and Energy. According to a Reuters report, the revisions may tighten restrictions and address flaws in rules that were initially unveiled on October 7, 2022.

The US government has not yet published an anticipated friend concept updating restrictions on imports of high-end chips used for artificial intelligence.

Separately, Gallagher stated in a speech to Reuters that the Commerce Department if” need any National person or company to obtain an export license prior to engaging with Chinese companies on RISC – V,” an open-source technology that can be used to design electronics.

Regarding the potential decision to impose additional restrictions on Huawei and SMIC, Foreign observers have differing opinions. In addition, & nbsp,

According to Lyu Dong, a journalist at Guancha.com,” some US lawmakers suggested that the US may restrict its companies from contributing to open-source technology, particularly in projects that involve Chinese firms.” Many people in the technology industry are silent as a result of this strategy.

The US does not have any benefits in developing RISC-V; it is not that China is using American firms to improve its technologies, Lyu continues.” This is a recommendation that will not help increase the attractiveness of the US firms, but lessen their international market shares.” In actuality, US businesses must expand in China’s areas.

McCaul and Gallagher are both Republicans, according to Zhang Tengjun, deputy director and equate research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies’ Department for American Studies. They want to exert pressure on the Biden presidency and advance China and the US’s modern dispersion. & nbsp,

Zhang opined that in order to advance their political plan,” they also want to cater to the needs of native anti-China forces by exaggerating the” China danger.” ” The Biden administration will have its own judgment as it understands that if the US imposes more restrictions on China, it will be a lose-lose condition.”

On the other hand, on Monday, a journalist from Beijing published an article titled” Regulations on RISC – V will pose risks to China.”

” China may find it challenging to acquire and use this technology due to the US government’s stringent controls on RISC-V.” This will present challenges for China’s technological advancement and development in chip design and production, the journalist wrote in the post. & nbsp,

Additionally, he claims that restrictions on RISC-V could harm China’s investments in microprocessor technology because investors are typically drawn to industries with strict regulations.

Arm versus RISC-V

During Raimondo’s attend to Beijing on August 29, Huawei quietly introduced its new Mate60 Pro handset. The Kirin 9000s processor in the phone was created by SMIC using its N 2 technology, according to TechInsights, a Canadian research firm.

Analysis revealed that the Kirin 9000s device has two Arm Cortex A510 energy-efficient components and four high-performance Taishan V120 core. According to reports, Huawei has acquired a permanent permit to use the Arm V8 training collection created by Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp. and based in the United Kingdom.

The US prohibited Huawei from using the V9 layout because it had contributed important solutions to Arm’s structures. Huawei built the Taishan structures as a result, but the same research reveals that it still needs to rely on the Arm 1.

According to some IT columnists, Huawei’s HarmonyOS and the open-source RISC-V infrastructure may one day replace Chinese operating system-chipset ecosystems.

According to a Hunan-based author in an content,” The two primary operating system – chipset ecosystems are the” Wintel”( Windows OS and Intel’s x86 infrastructure ) and” An’ A’ ( Android O and the Arm structures).” Of course, there is also the” I-A” system( Apple’s iOS and the Arm architecture ), but it is a closed system.

He claims that if HarmonyOS and RISC-V may become China’s habitat, it will have a significant impact on the information technology industry. He does this by pointing to the TH1520 and Alibaba processors’ most recent collaboration.

Huawei, ZTE, Alibaba, Unisoc, and Tencent are among the RISC-V Foundation’s Taiwanese people, according to Chinese media, while Intel, Google, Qualcomm and SiFive are its National people. & nbsp,

The RISC – V Foundation, which was established in 2015, claimed that about 10 billion of these chips have been produced worldwide and that by 2025, the number may reach 80 billion models.

In addition to McCaul and Gallagher, Democrat Senator Marco Rubio and Democrat Senator Mark Warner have urged the Biden administration to address RISC-V, citing concerns for national protection.

According to Rubio, China is creating open-source chip infrastructure to get around US sanctions and expand its chip industry.

According to Warner, the current export-control regulations are unprepared to handle the difficulty of open-source technology in RISC-V or the field of artificial intelligence. He claimed that a significant paradigm change is required.

Raimondo wants more and better tools to stop Huawei, according to the article.

@ jeffpao3 Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at & nbsp.

Continue Reading