Commentary: India goes its own way on global geopolitics

Commentary: India goes its own way on global geopolitics


There are political minefields ahead for India and its partners. NATO-Russia tensions will surely rise when Sweden and Finland ’s requests for membership are taken up. A good intensification of the Russia-Ukraine war might power India to choose among its Quad partners and Russia.

India’s earlier intention to achieve multipolarity with the BRICS will be also less tenable when Russia-China relations become ironclad. The notion of the more distributed strength system will collide against the reality that closer ties with the US may appear a much better option for India.

At the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war, India worried that China would certainly gain an enfeebled and dependent The ussr as a junior companion. New Delhi was to lose Russia as a strong and reliable geopolitical partner. Financially, the sanctions upon Russia are setting off a process of de-dollarisation that benefits The far east. The Ukraine issue could deliver benefits to China it could not have or else secured.

Indian policymakers are wagering that Russia is not going to want to put just about all its eggs in a single basket and that Russian federation will continue to respect India’s independence. The weakened Russia can still have veto strength at the UN Protection Council where Indian has historically already been a beneficiary.

India is gambling that the level of convergence with the Quad associates on China’s hostility in the Indo-Pacific is certainly strong enough for them to tolerate dissonance on additional grounds. It is counting on its friends in order to realise that pressure to take sides is usually unlikely to produce results and may backfire.

India has combined its strategic autonomy without economic or even strategic costs. The Quad partners show up willing to tolerate variations – after all, there is absolutely no Indo-Pacific without Indian.

New Delhi has been able to fixed the terms associated with global engagement in the current geopolitical constellation. Yet depending on the outcome of the particular Ukraine war, India’s conception of the type of global order that will guards its tactical autonomy may have to be reluctantly refined.

Deepa M Ollapally is Research Professor of International Affairs and Movie director of the Rising Capabilities Initiative at the Elliott School of Worldwide Affairs, George Washington University. This commentary was   initial published   within East Asia Discussion board.