Mediacorp DJ Joakim Gomez reflects on Singapore Idol past, is at peace with being known as ‘failed singer’ from the show

One of the investigators, Stephanie Fam, started off by apologising to Gomez– saying she had been asking a extremely delicate issue. She went on to say that she “used to hate the tv DJ” in the past.

” I didn’t think you deserve to be in Singapore Hero in the first place”, said Fam. ” At least I didn’t believe you deserved to advance as far as you did.”

Then, when she inquired about Gomez’s response to her,” I would include hated myself on Singapore Hero as well,” he bravely responded,” I would have hated myself there as well.”

How can this awful Joakim Gomez singer get replaced with a better singer, not this one? asked Gomez.

He continued, praising his close friends and family for cheering him up when he was “very unhappy” and “felt the entire world was against]him.”

Gomez, however, refused to “victimise himself” and in addition to his support system, added that” therapy]was ] always available”.

Gomez was forced to answer concerns about his Hero days at other times throughout the season.

Continue Reading

Retrenchments in Singapore fall in 2024, employment growth slows: Advance estimates

EMPLOYMENT GROWTH SLOWED

Singapore’s full career continued to grow in 2024 although the progress slowed.

Total employment growth in 2024 is expected to be 45,500, lower than the 78,800 increase in 2023, when the number of work force buyers rose considerably.

After experiencing a decrease in the previous month, native work increased in 2024.

In 2024, more people were employed in higher-skilled areas including specialist services, financial solutions as well as in health and social services.

“On the other hand, non-resident career development moderated in 2024 compared to 2023, with getting in building driving up job of work permit buyers, ” said MOM.  

Total employment growth fell in the fourth quarter to 8,700 from 22,300 in the third quarter. However, this was still higher compared with the last quarter in 2023, when it was 3,900.

Demand for residents in growth sectors remained strong, with employment increases in key sectors such as professional services, financial services, and health and social services.

” There was also an uptick in retail trade due to year-end seasonal hiring, following declines in earlier quarters,” it added.  

Similar to previous quarters, non-resident employment increased primarily as a result of employers ‘ inability to find enough permanent employees to fill positions.

Non-resident employment declined in outward-oriented sectors such as information and communications, and insurance services.

OUTLOOK 

With the improving economic environment, Singapore’s labour market is expected to maintain its growth trajectory going forward, said MOM.  

According to the ministry’s polls, the percentage of businesses anticipating hiring more workers increased from 43 % in September to 46 % in December.

About 32 % of companies polled in December said they planned to raise wages, up from 16 % in September.

” Nevertheless, given the sustained uncertainty in the global economy, employers and workers need to press on with transformation and upskilling to adapt to changes and seize new opportunities,” said MOM.  

It was pointed out that as the resident workforce ages and shrinks over time, employers must acknowledge the need for increasing manpower.  

There is only limited headroom for resident employment to continue growing, according to the ministry with an already high resident labor force participation rate by international standards and low resident unemployment.  

Employers must invest in human capital development to maximize the potential of their employees.

We will need to remain open to foreign investments and global talent, which will in turn lead to more opportunities for local businesses and high-quality jobs for Singaporeans, in order to maintain Singapore’s economic competitiveness and complement our resident workforce. “

Continue Reading

Malaysia turns away hundreds of Rohingya refugees amid local concerns

“CRISIS WITHIN A CRISIS”

Arfaat Mohammed Emran, a refugee from Rohingya, arrived in Malaysia nearly ten years ago after fleeing Maungdaw, a village in Rakhine State.

He is currently a teacher at a Langkawi group college that UNHCR has funded.

Despite not adhering to the UN convention on immigrants, the father of two is appreciative of Malaysia providing him and his family with momentary protection.

” We feel secure, but never for a long time”, he added. ” We have been waiting for UN account for any settlement, or if our country is at peace, we need to transfer to our country, like volunteer return”.

But the situation up home appears to be worsening with the military cutting off contact, he said. &nbsp,

Arfaat hopes that Malaysia’s leadership of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN ) this year will help to highlight the suffering of Rohingyas and put an end to their persecution.

This year, Langkawi may host at least 30 Asian meetings.

” It’s a crisis within a crisis”, said Thitinan Pongsudhirak, director of the Institute of Security and International Studies at Chulalongkorn University’s Faculty of Political Science. &nbsp,

” On one hand, there’s a turmoil of the revolution and civil conflict that has to be resolved apparently, and ASEAN has a large, major role in that”, he added.

However, ASEAN also needs to consider the Rohingya crises in Rakhine State and work with the Arakan army to stop the Rohingya Muslims ‘ oppression within that problems.

Continue Reading

Putin’s obsession with total victory crimps Trump’s peace promise – Asia Times

Donald Trump has already refuted his claim that he will resolve the Ukraine issue within the first 24 hours of business.

Trump’s counselors have then acknowledged that the conflict in Ukraine can’t be easily negotiated, just as he once said he would fix the US medical problems quickly and then backtracked to saying “nobody knew that heath care was thus complicated.” Trump’s” skill of the offer” does not really work in the real world of conflict solution.

Trump’s original intention was to provide further military support to Ukraine to deter further Russian aggression. This may encourage it to bring up the topic of the board.

Stopping aid to Ukraine might be a different tactic to help it deal. Trump would demand that Ukraine surrender its territory and establish an 800-mile demilitarized buffer zone ( to be guarded by NATO or European troops ) once “peace talks” started.

Trump is friendly to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s claim that joining NATO poses a menace to Russian protection. Therefore, Ukraine would have to give up on aspired to actually join the local security bloc.

Russia, in turn, may get big restrictions pleasure, while a portion of the proceeds from&nbsp, tariffs&nbsp, on Russian energy imports would become allocated to&nbsp, Ukraine.

Trump’s peace plan was engineered by Russia-Ukraine special envoy Keith Kellogg ( a highly decorated three-star general ), who recently canceled an upcoming trip to Kyiv. Trump has already indicated that he wants to speak with Putin in order to “get the war over with.”

The biggest challenge is that Putin does not really want to make a deal, despite the plan’s numerous obstacles. Yes, in October, Russia was losing 1, 500 troops a day and the country was, and still is, struggling to recruit men.

With the onslaught of severe sanctions and being forced to spend tens of billions of dollars on defense rather than other government services, the Russian economy has had to deal with a lot.

All of this is irrelevant because Putin is so obsessed with Ukraine and her eventual victory. Russia might even be in a recession, as has been predicted in 2025, but that would still not be enough to force it to accept any compromise.

Putin categorically opposes Ukraine becoming a sovereign state. He either wants to control or destroy it. A weaker or nonexistent Ukraine would be a major blow to the United States ‘ position as a strongman in Russia, as well as a positive one for Putin’s legacy.

Unsurprisingly, Russia has already rejected the US’s unofficial suggestions, despite the fact that it has not yet seen an official statement on the subject. Putin favors serving as president during the war, and many Russians are willing to accept this new normal when they are under attack by oppression and inspired by patriotism.

Russia’s lack of compromise

Russia doesn’t think it needs to compromise. Putin is aware that he is much more determined than the West to defend Ukraine.

There are undoubtedly indications of fatigue in Europe for continuing to support Ukraine. In a YouGov poll of seven European countries ( France, Italy, Spain, Germany, the UK, Sweden and Denmark ), continuing support for Ukraine until Russia withdrew was found to be as low as 31 % on average, compared with around 40 % for encouraging a negotiated end to fighting, even if Ukraine lost territory.

In addition, lawmakers and the general public are exhausted in the US. Therefore, Congress, which is currently largely governed by the Republican party, may object to the provision of additional weapons to Ukraine.

In 2023, Republican opposition to Ukraine’s support already caused enormous delays. And while Republicans in Congress have been waning in favor of keeping the aid levels in Ukraine despite the Biden administration’s recent announcement of a new tranche of US$ 500 million, which is a portion of a total of$ 175 billion since the 2022 invasion.

This largely reflects the sentiments of the American public. In a Gallup poll conducted in December 2024, 48 % of people support US aiding Ukraine in regaining control of the land lost to Russia, marking the first time this percentage has fallen below the majority.

Support for Ukraine is also incredibly polar, with 74 % of Republicans and 30 % of Democrats wanting to end the conflict right away. Additionally, 67 % of Republicans think the US is doing too much.

Ultimately, it is likely there will be no peace deal any time soon because Trump does not really care about Ukraine, and doesn’t understand foreign policy. Adam Kinzinger, a former Republican congressman, recently claimed that Trump pursued foreign policy in the manner of a” three-year-old.”

Trump cares more about impressing Putin ( or being seen as a deal-maker ) than supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty. His vice-president, J. D. Vance, has been more direct about it, stating in 2022:” I gotta be honest with you, I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another”. This view could have a devastating effect on willingness, and commitment, to negotiate.

According to analysis by US historian Robert Kagan, without US aid, Ukraine will lose the war within the next 12-to-18 months. Yet, for every square mile Russia gains, it loses 40 men – a heavy price to pay ( Ukraine’s total area is 233, 100 square miles ).

The initial proclamations that Trump would resolve the Ukraine crisis in 24 hours were campaign bluster that showed little awareness of the conflict’s intrusibility and the difficulties of establishing a new administration.

A few weeks ago, Trump stated that part of his plan “is a surprise“. The surprise factor extends beyond the general public. Perhaps Trump has no idea what his next steps will be when it comes to putting an end to this conflict. And that could play perfectly into Putin’s hands.

Natasha Lindstaedt is professor in the department of government, University of Essex

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Jeju Air: Bird feathers found in engines of crashed South Korean jet

10 days before
Kelly Ng

BBC News

Reporting fromSingapore
Jean Mackenzie

BBC News

Reporting fromSeoul
EPA Firefighters remove tarpaulin sheets covering the debris of a Jeju Air passenger plane at Muan International Airport in Muan, southwestern South Korea, 13 January 2025, following its crash on 29 December 2024.EPA

According to authorities, they have found proof of a bird attack on a rider plane that crashed in South Korea in December and caused the deaths of 179 individuals.

According to a preliminary research report released on Monday, the birds and body stains on both engines of the Jeju Air planes were caused by the Baikal purple, a species of migrant bird that files in big flocks.

The animal hit and a concrete structure at the end of the airport, which the planes crashed into, will now be the focus of the investigation into the fall, which is the deadliest on North Korean ground.

According to the report, the Boeing 737-800’s machines may be torn over and the concrete structure will be further examined.

The Jeju Air aircraft took off from Bangkok on December 29 in the morning and was headed for Muan International Airport in the south-west of the nation.

At about 08: 57 native time, three days after aircraft made contact with the airport, the control tower advised the team to be careful of “bird action”.

The captain reported that the aircraft had struck a bird at 08:59 and issued a call signal.

The captain therefore requested permission to make an emergency landing from the opposite direction, and during this time it belly-landed without the landing gear in place. According to the report, it overran the airport and exploded after crashing into the material structure.

A graphic shows the final moments of Flight 7C2216 with the aircraft touching down with landing gear up on the runway near the airport. The photo below shows the Jeju Air plane skidding along the runway. The bottom image shows the aircraft in a dark cloud of debris as it hits an embankment.

Authorities earlier said that flight data and cockpit voice recorders from the plane stopped recording about four minutes before the disaster.

Specialists who had flown the exact type of aircraft involved in the accident have even questioned the existence of concrete barriers along the airport, some claiming that the victim burden would have been lower if they had not been there.

The material composition holds a tracking system that assists airplane flights, known as a localiser.

According to South Korea’s transportation ministry, this system can be found at various airports in the nation and even abroad.

Last week, authorities announced that they will change the concrete barriers used for navigation at seven airports across the country. Seven airports will also have their runway safety areas adapted following a review.

The initial report has been sent to the aerospace company of the United Nations and to the governments of the United States, France, and Thailand.

A composite image with photos showing the embankment off the end of the runway at Muan International Airport, the wreckage of the plane that crashed, and a graphic showing the runway and the 250-metre distance to the embankment.

Continue Reading

Police summons motorcyclist who hit Korean on crossing

The moment when Kwanchai jumps the red light on Phaya Thai Road in Bangkok’s Ratchathewi district on Jan 23 and struck a Korean man walking in a zebra crossing. (Screenshot from dashboard cam footage)
The incident occurred on January 23 when Kwanchai struck a Asian male while crossing a horse crossing on Phaya Thai Road in Bangkok’s Ratchathewi area. ( Screenshot from dashboard cam footage )

The motorist who used a pedestrian crossing on Phaya Thai Road last week to hit and injure a Vietnamese holiday has been called for questioning by the police to appear in court on Tuesday. &nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp,

In the same location in 2022, a female physician was killed by a speeding motorcycle.

The motorist, who has only been identified as Kwanchai, will turn himself in to the Phaya Thai police station to report to them on suspicion of irresponsible driving, in violation of Section 390 of the Criminal Code, causing harm to people, and inflicting harm on another. &nbsp,

The neglect charge carries a fine of up to 10, 000 ringgit and/or one-month in captivity. A maximum sentence of three years in jail and/or a great of 60, 000 ringgit under Section 300 is imposed for reckless driving that causes severe injuries. &nbsp,

The arrest of Mr. Kwanchai had been delayed, according to Pol Col Watcharawee Thammasaema, the captain of the Phaya Thai authorities place, on Monday because he sustained minor injuries in the accident. &nbsp, &nbsp,

On the evening of January 23rd, a report camera footage from a auto showed Mr. Kwanchai and a 68-year-old Asian male hitting a motorbike with a rider passenger through a red traffic light.

In front of Bhumirajanagarindra Kidney Institute Hospital is the cross. The man fell to the ground motionless and was taken to Phyathai 1 Hospital, &nbsp,

On the same commuter cross, off-duty police officer officer driving a Ducati superbike ran down and killed Dr. Waraluck Supawatjakul of Chulalongkorn University three years prior. That event sparked nationwide indignation. &nbsp,

Pol Col Watcharawee said Mr Kwanchai’s body drinking test was negative. After this week, family of the damaged Korean who lives in Thailand would meet with police and speak on his behalf. They may claim compensation afterwards, through the judges, he said. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

Yes, reshoring US industry is possible and happening – Asia Times

Reshoring the British business has become a nonpartisan policy goal because Biden had a lot of interest in it. The concept has always been met with skepticism from a variety of angles.

Anything that involves tariffs and/or professional policies is viewed with suspicion by some economists and completely traders. And politics being what it is in America, both Republicans and Democrats have undoubtedly doubted the capacity of the other party to fulfill their promises. But in addition, I typically encounter a healthy skepticism about America’s skill to perform manufacturing&nbsp, at all.

Americans may be forgiven for having this idea. Most of our lived knowledge has either been the Rust Belt time of the 1980s, or&nbsp, the charged offshoring&nbsp, of the 1990s, 2000s and 2010s. America has not had a factory-building increase in a very long time.

On top of that, most people who take economics in America know only one theory of global business, which is the principle of&nbsp, analytical advantage&nbsp, — generally, the idea that countries specialize in whatever they are best at. Because of the decades-long trend, it’s reasonable to assume that America focuses on technology and service rather than producing real goods.

If you think that, you likely think that reshoring production will always be a difficult, if not impossible, task. Sure, with sufficient taxes and grants we could&nbsp, force&nbsp, Americans to get more expensive products made in America, but this will render us all poorer. Why not concentrate on what we appear to be good at and left manufacturing to the East Asians and perhaps the Germans?

And still the right way to think about business isn’t always the best one. There ‘s&nbsp, another theory&nbsp, that says that since America has tons of money and technology, we can accomplish a lot of automatic production. And there ‘s&nbsp, but another theory&nbsp, that says that because the universe loves multitude, the US can produce near variations of the stuff the Asians and Europeans make.

Since the turn of the century, the US has experienced underdevelopment, which may have been due to an overvalued exchange rate, intentional Chinese rivals, and US business laws that favored the financial industry over the manufacturing industry.

The common belief that Americans just aren’t good at making stuff seems contradicted by areas in which we are &nbsp, startlingly good at making stuff&nbsp, — for example, SpaceX, which is pumping out the world’s best rockets from US factories in stunningly high volumes. The American South has also become a hub of high-quality auto manufacturing, with the help of Japanese and South Korean investment.

If that’s true, then reshoring has a chance. Although the uncompetitive dollar will continue to be a major issue, tariffs and other trade barriers can prevent Chinese competition, and US industrial policies can switch from pro-finance to pro-manufacturing ones. In fact, this approach is already bearing fruit in a number of strategic industries.

Take&nbsp, solar power, for instance. The collapse of US manufacturing and China’s overwhelming dominance for years served as the industry’s main story. In&nbsp, an article in Bloomberg&nbsp, last September, David Fickling lamented:

The US and Europe’s disregard for their own clean-tech industries is the result of myopic corporate leadership, timid financing, oligopolistic complacency, and policy chaos. That left a gap that Chinese start-ups filled, sprouting like saplings in a forest clearing.

But even before that story hit the presses, things had already begun to change. In December, the Solar Energy Industry Association &nbsp, reported&nbsp, that US solar manufacturing capabilities are on the rise:

In 2017, the US ranked 14th in the world for solar panel manufacturing capacity. With a focus in the South, additional factories started popping up all over the nation with an emphasis on expanding existing facilities starting in 2018 and then accelerating in 2022. Today, the US has leapfrogged competitors and ranks 3rd in manufacture of solar panels, passing large solar manufacturing countries like Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Turkey…A new report by SEIA and Wood Mackenzie found that the industry had reached a critical threshold:

US solar manufacturing has reached a critical point following a record-setting Q3. American solar module factories can now produce enough to meet nearly all the demand for solar in the US when they are at full capacity.

As more solar deployment happens, more manufacturing will come online…Companies are investing billions of dollars to produce American-made solar panels in states like Georgia, Ohio, Texas, Washington, South Carolina, and Alabama…]T] here are more factories on the way, either announced or under construction.

Although it is obvious that the US is still far behind China, this growing trend of production and self-sufficiency is very different from the typical narrative you hear. As the article notes, the reshoring of solar began in the late 2010s, under Trump, and may have had something to do with Trump’s tariffs on solar panels. A second round of tariffs, courtesy of Biden, went into effect near the end of 2024, and definitely seemed to have an effect on solar imports:

Source: &nbsp, Joey Politano

However, Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act was the real catalyst for solar reshoring:

Source: SEIA

For another example, look at&nbsp, semiconductors. I ‘ve&nbsp, written a lot&nbsp, about how the CHIPS Act has galvanized U. S. production in this most strategic of all industries, including major investments from Taiwan and elsewhere. This is from&nbsp, a recent report&nbsp, by the CHIPS Program Office:

Over the past four years, there has been more investment in electronics manufacturing in the United States than in the last three decades combined. Plans for investments totaling nearly$ 450 billion are now available, making this the largest wave of semiconductor manufacturing growth in US history. This includes the two largest domestic investments in semiconductor manufacturing by US companies in history ( Intel and Micron ), as well as the two largest foreign direct investments in new projects by any company in history ( TSMC and Samsung ) …Perhaps most significantly, for the first time, all five of the world’s leading-edge logic and dynamic random-access memory ( DRAM ) manufacturers ( Intel, Micron, Samsung, SK hynix, and TSMC) are building and expanding in the United States. In contrast, no other country’s economy has more than two of these factories working there…

The United States is projected to produce at least 20 % of the world’s leading-edge logic chips by 2030 (up from zero percent in 2022 ) and ~10 % of its leading-edge DRAM chips by 2035 ( also up from zero percent ) —both technologies that are essential to the future of artificial intelligence ( AI), high-performance compute, and advanced military systems. For the first time in nearly a decade, a new factory in Arizona has begun producing these technologies domestically. This is the first time in almost a decade that a new factory has done so.

And The Economist, certainly no friend of industrial policy in general, has &nbsp, grudgingly admitted&nbsp, that US reshoring of the semiconductor industry is succeeding:

Early returns are impressive: the]CHIPS Act ] programme has catalysed about$ 450bn of private investments. And this money is spread across much of the industry, from high-tech packaging to memory chips. The most advanced chips, which are less than 10 nanometers in size, are a key indicator of success. In 2022 America made few such chips. By 2032 it is on track to have a share of 28 % of global capacity.

Foreign direct investment, especially from Taiwan’s TSMC, has been significant in the case of US auto manufacturing a generation earlier.

In early 2024, some poorly informed pundits were writing stories declaring that” DE I killed the CHIPS Act”, while&nbsp, others were wondering&nbsp, whether Americans had a culture capable of making chips. Those articles were spectacularly ill-timed — obstacles were quickly overcome, and the factory is now&nbsp, pumping out 4nm chips. Those are, by at least some measures, the most advanced semidconductors ever made on American soil.

And what’s more, those chips are being made with yields ( i. e., quality ) that are &nbsp, comparable to, or even higher than, what Taiwanese factories get. The notion that American workers couldn’t produce high-quality goods proved to be incorrect.

The cost of the chips made in the US is a little higher ( about 30 % more right now ), but that price difference will likely decrease as the demand increases and the chipmaking experience spreads throughout the nation.

In fact, the reshoring effort is going so well that TSMC is&nbsp, now planning&nbsp, to build even more cutting-edge chips at its US plants:

The effort to reshore semiconductors has so far been a huge success.

Batteries&nbsp, look like a third reshoring success. Currently, most batteries are produced in China, but the Inflation Reduction Act may be&nbsp, starting to turn things around:

Source: &nbsp, Canary Media

It’s not just factories being announced, either, production in the US is way up:

Source: &nbsp, Joey Politano

The reshoring of the solar, chip, and battery industries is direct criticism of the critics and evidence of American manufacturing’s viability.

Although these are only three different types of industries, they will undoubtedly facilitate the reshoring of those that are either producing these manufacturers or using their own resources. American reindustrialization isn’t just about a few key tentpole industries — it’s about a whole web of suppliers, customers, related industries, and talent.

Fortunately, we can already see this web starting to form in the US SEIA&nbsp, reports&nbsp, that America’s solar manufacturing boom isn’t just limited to the panels themselves, but related industries like solar tracker, solar inverters, and upstream materials production like wafers and ingots.

Meanwhile, the CHIPS Program Office&nbsp, reports&nbsp, that the semiconductor boom also includes downstream activities like packaging and testing. The Economist&nbsp, points out&nbsp, that this ecosystem, as well as the talent that gets developed for the CHIPS Act’s projects, will reduce costs and help sustain future expansion of chip manufacturing in America:

The subsidies have reduced the cost of building and running fabs in America by about 30 % compared to those in Asian nations. Because Asian governments give companies more money, their costs are lower in part.

However, Asian producers have also benefited from dense manufacturing clusters, which have well-trained workers and a large supply chain nearby. The goal is that CHIPS in America has initiated this process. ” It’s enough to get the flywheel going”, says ]outgoing Commerce Secretary Gina ] Raimondo.

Currently, it is largely a matter of political will and decency whether reshoring continues. If Donald Trump continues to criticize the solar industry or follows through on his previous threats to revoke the CHIPS Act, production could significantly shift back to China.

It would be ironic if a president who came to power and promised to revive American industry ended up being the one who put an end to our industrial revival.

This article was first published on Noah Smith’s Noahpinion&nbsp, Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become a Noahopinion&nbsp, subscriber&nbsp, here.

Continue Reading

From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?

CRITICAL BATTLEGROUND: SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS

While tax talks continue to dominate worldwide headlines, experts say the real battlefield is systems, silicon microchips in particular which power anything from electric vehicles to smartphones, computers and satellites. &nbsp,

The slender but potent chips have long been at the center of the US-China business war, which has been fueled by China’s drive for semiconductor independence and US efforts to thwart China’s access to cutting-edge chip-making technology. &nbsp,

According to Jing Qian, co-founder and managing director of the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis,” the US-China tech war will probably get worse as Washington tightens import controls and Beijing pushes harder for semiconductor self-reliance.” &nbsp,

China has previously launched what experts believe to be its strongest counterretaliation against US antitrust laws, which were also used in Beijing’s well-known investigation against US intel Nvidia.

China’s business government launched a probe into US device exports on January 16 to find out if US device producers were receiving unfair advantages through incentives and grants. &nbsp,

According to a government director,” Companies have been exporting related mature-process device goods to China at low prices, thereby favoring the legitimate interests of the local market.” ” The concerns of China’s domestic industry are reasonable and they have the right to request a trade remedy investigation” .&nbsp,
 
The analysis was a strong and” calculated response” from Beijing to US laws, Jing said, one that “leveraged China’s substantial market size and manufacturing capacity to assert itself as a communicator of similar standing”.

According to Jing,” These actions are a part of a wider plan to unwind US companies and influence policymakers ‘ choices,” as well as cautioning that they also come with risks. &nbsp,

” Heightened compliance fees, regulatory uncertainty and worries of arbitrary enforcement may deter foreign investment and hinder technological cooperation, probably undermining China’s long-term goals”, he added. &nbsp,

China’s antitrust laws have “grown stronger” in recent months, noted Chen.

According to Chen,” Antitrust investigations are intended to uncover and correct anti-competitive behaviors or violations of merger conditions.” &nbsp,

According to China, they must maintain a foundation in antitrust principles in order to avoid undermining transparency and stumbling investor confidence.

According to him,” Escalation only makes sense for Beijing if forceful responses impede further adversarial policies or put pressure on Beijing to reverse existing US measures,” he continued, adding,” I do not believe China needs to enshrine antitrust laws to ( put ) foreign companies at a disadvantage.

Continue Reading