Amber Heard asks court to declare a mistrial in Johnny Depp defamation case over issue with juror

Amber Heard asks court to declare a mistrial in Johnny Depp defamation case over issue with juror
In court documents dated July 8 within the circuit court of Fairfax County, Virginia, which supplemented an early on filing, attorneys regarding Heard claim the information on the jury solar panel list sent to lawyer ahead of trial seems does not appear to fit the demographics of just one of the jurors.
Juror 15 was apparently born in 1970, but the summons to be a juror was for someone of the same last-name born in 1945, the court documents declare.
“Juror No . 15 was not the individual summoned for jury responsibility on April eleven, 2022 and therefore was not part of the jury cell and could not have properly served on the jury at this trial, inch the memorandum scans. “Therefore, a mistrial should be declared plus a new trial purchased. ”
The paperwork state that Juror fifteen and the individual initially summoned to serve on the jury each live at the same tackle.
“As the particular Court no doubt agrees, it is deeply troubling for an individual not really summoned for court duty nonetheless to look for jury duty and serve on the jury, especially in an instance such as this, ” the filing continues.
It can unclear if the court was aware of the alleged error prior to the trial.
CNN provides reached out to the courtroom and to Depp’s lawyers for comment. Depp’s attorneys have thirty days to respond Heard’s motion.
The court submitting argues that Heard’s due process was compromised if the individual was not the same person on the list, or if the clerk failed to verify his or her identification.
Heard and Depp were both found liable for defamation in their lawsuits against one another last month, however the jury awarded $15 million in problems to Depp in support of $2 million to Heard.
In a filing last week, Heard’s lawyers previously raised the potential issue of the juror and claimed the particular damages awarded in order to Depp were excessive and unsupported by evidence at demo. They also accused Depp of relying on “time-barred and judicially privileged statements as the time frame for his defamation by innuendo claims. ”
CNN’s Kristina Sgueglia and Mirna Alsharif contributed to this report.