The day of Donald Trump’s independence in Tokyo seems like it was a long time ago. In its place comes Capitulation Day, as the self-proclaimed” Tax Man” caved in to China’s Xi Jinping faster than even the expenditure bull had hoped.
Blinked. sprained. Retreated. Quit. Swerved. Blanched. Forgotten. remained. All are thoughts America’s most feudal president in 125 times hates now that they’re being used to describe how China outmaneuvered his White House with the tax peace announced Monday in Geneva.
Trump and his aides are pretending to be trying to portray this as anything other than a fatal climbdown. However, as Trump’s 145 % tariffs are reduced to 30 % for at least 90 days, there is no way to disguise the popping of champagne corks in Beijing today.
But the odds of this financial truce having are also lower than Trump’s flagging authorization rating. Although there are many causes for this, the three most important are listed below.
One, the stories about Trump yelling in the face of falling areas are certain to force him back into the fray. If there’s anything that animates the art-of-the-deal leader, it’s being perceived , as , the “loser” in any dialogue.
Trump will undoubtedly be enraged by his remarks about his up-front and Xi’s masterful long game, which include giving him much in return for the delay beyond the new 125 % taxes.
News analysis reports on how Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and various Asian countries may defeat Trump in the same way Team Xi did.
This” total reset”, as the White House calls it, is by far” Trump ‘s , biggest climbdown to date”, says Eurasia Group founder Ian Bremmer. Beijing has only” properly called Trump’s bluff,” according to Mark Williams, an analyst at Capital Economics.
Trump’s return to the battlefield of trade war is not certain. But the odds that he just sits up and lets a degrading news cycle play out in real time don’t look great. The volatile 78-year-old from Queens has rarely, if ever, displayed before, but it would require a degree of elegance and self-control.
However, Trump’s military retreat in the hottest trade-war conflict sends a message to another world leaders who dread their Oval Office visits: plunging markets may change Trump’s mind in a blink.
Events in Geneva are a” indication that the US is more determined than China to provide the’ de-escalation’ information to the market”, analysts at Jeffries, an investment bank, read.
Two, it is unlikely that China will lose the compromises Trump believes he deserves.
Of course, the difficult part is today. Trump is sure to notice his share selloff to a 30 % tax from 145 % as a surprise to Xi, deserving of some major cooperation.
Team Xi may probably have a very different point of view. Trump looked into the economical abyss and witnessed angry Wall Street titan glaring up at him from Beijing’s point of view.
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who runs the world’s biggest banks by industry capitalization, spoke for The Street when he complained Trump’s tariffs were” too big, too large and very aggressive” — even if one thinks it’s wise to play hardball with foes and allies everywhere.
Retailers ‘ extremely ominous warnings about empty shelves and images of stale container ships crowded the coasts of Seattle, Los Angeles, and Baltimore finally came to an end.
The so-called “bond vigilantes” made headlines about many trillions of dollars in stock market losses, as well as speculation that Trump would experience a” Trumpcession.” This gave the White House a clear choice in terms of who his boss was and left him with much choice.
The exact went for China’s position going into the trip trade talks in Geneva. Team Xi demanded a kindness movement regarding taxes, and Trump complied in the end.
The phraseological dramatic excursion says it all. Around Liberation Day, Trump World argued the US is being “looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by governments near and way”. The topic of discussion is today” the value of a long-term, socially beneficial economic and trade relationship.”
Observers are free to interpret this as a split-screen second. What it really is, though, is the financial equivalent of a procedure. This is not a de-escalation; rather, it is an alternate academic world.  ,
But by now, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer know full well that China is feeling emboldened, no cowed, by the last two months. Xi’s people are demanding that Trump’s are seen as Team Trump requests a compromises listing from China.
This won’t be properly received in Trump World. But finally, Trump’s quite determined business “deal” in name only with the UK set quite a law.
Given that the UK and the US trade deficit, it’s unclear why a US chief may engage in political labor negotiations with Keir Starmer‘s authorities. The answer is a burning desire for a frightened gain, if there ever was one.
How’s how University of Michigan analyst Justin , Wolfers amounts of Trump’s business “deal” with London:” Laser focused on reducing rates for regular Americans from Day One, the senator has struck a deal that will lower the price of Rolls-Royces, Bentleys, Jaguars, Aston Martins, Range Rovers, and Minis. No other consumer goods were given carve-outs.
Three, Trump’s 40-plus-year belief that tariffs will magically restore America.
Trump’s most consistent economic view — one might say the only consistent view— through the decades is that Asia is exploiting the US and only import taxes can save the day.
Who else in the public would refer to tariffs as “beautiful” and claim that they will” supercharge” the US economy when everyone else is aware that they are inherently stagflationary?
Trump also doesn’t seem to understand that customers and retailers pay these taxes, not the nation that ships goods to Walmart, Target, and Amazon. He also believes, wrongly, that tariff “revenues” can replace income taxes in an economy carrying a US$ 36 trillion-plus national debt.
No one can currently respond to the where-to-now query. Investors can project their best-case/worst-case scenarios onto the white canvas of Trump’s 90-day pause in his 145 % tariff.
” If the US can get the Chinese to commit to meaningful trade rebalancing within 90 days, it would be historic”, says Jamie Cox, managing partner of the Harris Financial Group. There is still a very steep hill to climb to get a real agreement because the Chinese are quite adept at stalling.
Team Xi might take former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s example in this regard. In 2018 and 2019, the late Abe managed to slow-walk negotiations with the Trump 1.0 White House.
Abe cozied up to Trump like no other democratic leader at the time. He even nominated Trump for the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize, received expensive presents, including a$ 3,800 golf club, and flattered him ad nauseam.
It didn’t win Japan a perfect return. Trump left the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership, which was at the heart of Tokyo’s effort to contain China economically, despite Abe’s pleas.
Additionally, Trump 1.0 did not waive the steel and aluminum taxes on “friend” and Abe . And Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party was none too happy that Trump’s weird flirtation with North Korean tyrant Kim Jong Un came at the expense of Japan’s national security.
Abe managed to drag out the clock for so long, so a desperate Trump consented to a bilateral agreement that had no impact on US-Japan trade dynamics. Abe even persuaded Trump to remove all autos from the table.
As Jeffrey , Schott, economist at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, notes, the pact “did little more than partly restoring the benefits that Trump recklessly threw away when he pulled the United States out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership”.
Without a doubt, Team Xi is busy planning their own Abe-like dodge, minus the aggressive flattery. Xi’s Communist Party, of course, does not have to contest mid-term elections 18 months from now. And Xi is aware of it.
Therefore, Beijing isn’t in a rush to sign a” Phase Two” trade agreement, with a US leader almost certain to demand a” Phase Three” round of negotiations in the coming year.
At the same time, US officials are learning the hard way that Trump’s chaotic Phase One process prompted China to pivot to other markets.
The 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN), which is China’s top trading partner, is now followed by the European Union.
Additionally, China is actively increasing its market share among the BRICS, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and the Global South. Xi’s” Made in China 2025″ strategy has been quietly making the nation more self-sufficient.
In a recent Foreign Affairs article, economists Brendan Kelly and Michael Hirson wrote that “de-risking is frequently described as a Western goal.”
” China has, however, intentionally pursued this approach for more than ten years. A central focus of the Made in China 2025 initiative, which Beijing launched in 2015, was to reduce China’s reliance on foreign products. And to make China a leader in the fields of semiconductors, batteries, biotechnology, aerospace, and artificial intelligence.
However, Kelly and Hirson also doubt that China and the Trump administration will ever form a productive partnership.
” Genuinely delivering on the terms of an ambitious deal would require enormous political commitment from both capitals to overcome the logic of de-risking”, Kelly and Hirson write.
Bottom line:” No significant de-risking reconsideration is likely to occur in the next four years, no matter how much Xi or Trump says he wants a deal.”
Trump refutes this assertion, and he does so severely. But the ways in which Xi has Trump’s number and this White House is boxed in by financial markets that are calling the shots, it’s hard to believe that the tariff truce agreed in Geneva can hold for very long.
Follow William Pesek on X using the hashtag# WilliamPesek