Southeast Asia (Page 27)

Bangkok: A Thai judge has determined that Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin’s appointment of a convicted murderer to his Cabinet breached ethical standards, removing the troubled leading from strength after less than a year in office and reversing Thai politics ‘ relative chaos.

Even though Pichet had resigned swiftly, the Constitutional Court determined that Phichit Chuenban’s session, who had previously been imprisoned for attempting to pay court judges with cash in a case in a previous event against ex-premier and ruling Peua Thai group patron Thaksin Shinawatra, warranted his dismissal.

Srettha chose to visit a Bangkok city food industry instead of the court hearing. Srettha was widely reported to be in good spirits after the ruling, despite the president’s trusted legal advisor and democratic expert having indicated on Tuesday that his chances of winning may be slim.

What part, if any, did Thaksin play in the then tragic determination to reshuffle Phichit into Srettha’s reshuffled Cabinet, which was perhaps intended as a deliberate push at traditional competitors? The majority of the assistants, advisors, and appointees surrounding the political novice were well-known long-time Thaksin servants and loyalists, generally unknowable to Srettha.

Phumtham Wechayachai, the vice prime minister, and former Peua Thai brave Phumtham Wechayachai, is expected to hold the position of interim prime minister until a novel premier may be chosen by the political vote. Based on vote regulations, Peua Thai you nominate Paetongtarn Shinawatra as Thaksin’s girl or ailing former justice minister Chaikasem Nitisiri for the position of top.

Thaksin and his ex-wife, however, were known to be reluctant to put their uncooked girl, who was female on the 2023 plan road and only recently appointed as Peua Thai’s head, in the line of fire so quick in her political career. That’s likely more the case now as the kingdom’s politics become even more volatile and uncertain.

Less well known is how Thaksin and Peua Thai leaders view the court’s decision against Srettha as a royal establishment warning against Thaksin’s overt politicking following his royal pardon for criminal convictions, which enabled him to avoid spending a single day in proper prison on weak health grounds.

Srettha presided over a coalition government that was established in a deal reached by Thaksin and palace officials in the name of national unity prior to the election of last year. In a political convenience marriage that successfully brought together Peua Thai and military parties, Thaksin was freed from 15 years of self-exile through what turned out to be a partial, not full, royal pardon.

The courts turned down Thaksin’s recent request to leave the kingdom for medical treatment in Dubai as he prepares for trial on a renewed lese majeste complaint over comments he made to media in 2016 that Thaksin likely believed had been buried by his royal pardon. Convictions under Thailand’s royal shield law allow for 15-year prison sentences.

Early bets thus favor Deputy Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of the coalition’s second-ranking Bhumjaithai party who currently serves as interior minister, to become the next prime minister. Anutin served as health minister under the previous Prayut Chan-ocha military-steered government and has self-professed personal ties to King Vajiralongkorn.

Scion of a construction conglomerate, Anutin is widely seen as the face of Thailand’s wild and wooly experiment with marijuana legalization, with big and shady proponents of the trade in his Buriram province-based party, and came under fire for his perceived hamfisted handling of Thailand’s vaccine procurement at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Anutin is now thought to be the choice of Bangkok’s conservative elite, who are largely unpopular due to the military-aligned Palang Pracharat and United Thai Nation parties ‘ poor results in the 2023 election. However, his Bhumjaithai embodies more yellow-garbed conservative legs than it actually do.

In retrospect, Thaksin’s meeting with Anutin in July at a provincial golf course, which was covered by local press reports, may have already brokered the backroom deal that would have allowed Anutin to become premier despite Bhumjaithai’s second-ranking coalition position and the numerous political and electoral advantages that come with leading government.

One long-standing diplomatic contact who spoke to Asia Times on the condition of anonymity had spoken to Thaksin about how unhappy he was with Srettha’s performance and how he felt he was before today’s ruling.

Some perceived the palace’s unusual use of royal decorations on Srettha ahead of Vajiralongkorn’s 72nd birthday celebrations as a covert endorsement of the premier’s even-keeled and deferential rule before the anticipated decision of the Constitutional Court.

The good-natured Srettha’s short tenure will be largely remembered as ineffective, largely as a result of the bureaucratic opposition that prevented the implementation of his digital wallet cash hand-out scheme and his inability to pique the interest of big new foreign investors in the country’s laggard economy, despite the fact that he failed to do so.

Thailand’s growth rate since Srettha took office in September 2018 was anemic 1.9 %, down from 2.5 % in 2022, and lagging behind regional rivals like the Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam, which have recently experienced booms and gained from the decoupling from China to Southeast Asia.

Peua Thai’s reputation as the business-minded party of economic growth and revival has been undermined by the economic underperformance of his original Thai Rak Thai, which was elected in 2001 with the slogan” think new, act new,” in the wake of declining opinion polls. &nbsp,

The Constitutional Court’s decision to outlaw the election-winning, new-generation Move Forward party was made last week because its campaign call for reforming a royal defamation law was equivalent to trying to overthrow the constitutional monarchy with the king as head of state.

11 party executives, including the well-known prime minister candidate and ex-party leader Pita Limjaroenrat, who were all ex-party members for ten years, were removed from politics the day after Move Forward was resurrected under a new People’s Power party banner and with new leadership the following day.

The People’s Power party, a symbiotic nod to the military party that overthrew the absolute monarchy in 1932, has pledged to continue pushing for monarchical, military, and monopolist big business reform, in stark contrast to Srettha’s apparent incompetence for the kingdom’s conservative royalist elite’s agenda. &nbsp,

Continue Reading

This content was originally published by Pacific Forum, and it has since been republished. Learn the original&nbsp, around.

At the 37th Asia-Pacific Roundtable: &nbsp, Crisis in an Interregnum held in Kuala Lumpur June 4-6, 2024, scholars and practitioners from across the globe covered a range of issues and problems in the region.

There have been contentious discussions about Gaza, Ukraine, and the South China Sea. China’s attitude and actions in these global security issues were examined at the Roundtable as a growing global power. The Mekong River, where the lives of over 50 million people are at risk, is one that has been overlooked.

Since last year, escalating&nbsp, tensions&nbsp, and skirmishes between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea have once again made the articles. This issue prompted ASEAN to release an “unprecedented” &nbsp, joint statement&nbsp, on the matter before the end of 2023.

There is another body of water that has received much less interest than it should, despite The Atlantic calling the South China Sea issue” the most dangerous, fight no one is talking about.” Conspicuously absent from the Roundtable’s debate, yet, was the issue of the Mekong River’s transnational management.

The Mekong River, also known as the Lancang River within China, flows through five&nbsp, East Asian island says: Myanmar, Lao PDR, Thailand, Cambodia, and Vietnam. In recent years, the valley has drawn a lot of controversy, many of which involve China.

While the South China Sea territorial problems have elements of economic rewards, freedom of navigation, and stability, the main language has to do with asserting national independence. In contrast, what occurs on the Mekong does have a significant impact on the lives of many more.

The Mekong River Commission ( MRC ) estimated that out of nearly 65 million people who live in the Lower Mekong River Basin, &nbsp, 80 % of them depend on the river for their livelihoods.

There is an additional level of political difficulty for a valley that spans several states, such as the Mekong.

Because the river flows into the Indochina coast from the Tibetan Plateau, China may be putting a significantly greater risk ( intentionally or unintentionally ) to its southern neighbors than its South China Sea rival claims.

Despite the motives given above, the Mekong is still significantly less obvious than the South China Sea. What might the causes of this be?

The Mekong River is a much more complex issue with South Asian state having divergent interests, compared to the South China Sea debate, which is primarily between China and Southeast Asian claimants who have a common interest in standing up against Beijing.

Laos hopes to become the” Battery of Asia” by utilizing several hydropower dams that China and Thailand have invested in, and Vietnamese power is also being sold to Vietnam.

The very controversial&nbsp, Xayaburi Dam project&nbsp, in Laos has been criticized for its negative effects, particularly on upstream Mekong states including Cambodia. Yet at the same time, maybe somewhat ironically, Cambodia has also been building several rivers with&nbsp, Chinese support&nbsp, within its own place.

The complexity of the Mekong paints a less granular portrait of how Southeast Asian nations do not compete with China; rather, there are a jumble of economic and security interests spanning the world.

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN )’s institutional structure contributes to a somewhat speculative aspect.

We discussed why the Mekong River has attracted much less interest from ASEAN and beyond in a previous conversation between myself and Spanish political commentator Richard Javad Heydarian, even before the new hostilities between China and the Philippines, which brought the conflict into focus.

Heydarian noted that despite having existed for more than five years and having all of the mainland’s nations joined before the turn of the century, ASEAN still places a greater focus on sea Southeast Asia.

It also happens to be the case that member states that are more involved with the South China Sea problem, such as the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, which is not a claim but remain concerned due to its passions in the&nbsp, North Natuna Sea. The Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia are more important diplomacy and thus, can be more speech in their problems.

Another less well-known boards may host more in-depth discussions of the Mekong. In addition to the MRC, there are the&nbsp, Asian Development Bank‘s Greater Mekong Subregion&nbsp, ( GMS ) framework and the&nbsp, Lancang-Mekong Cooperation&nbsp, ( LMC) initiated by China.

Understandably, conversations taking spot on these websites may have received less attention in assessment. Cambodia and Laos, the most economically dependent nations in the Mekong dispute, are highly dependent on China, so they would be less voice on this topic than the Philippines on the South China Sea.

The fact that most people in the world are unaware of the Mekong is perhaps the most important yet terrible purpose for our ignorance of it.

The South China Sea is a big trading street that serves many of the nation’s leading economy, the Philippines, a vocal claim in the dispute, is a long-term agreement supporter of the United States.

The Mekong, on the other hand, rarely affects anyone outside the place apart from anxious environmentalists. Even though the Mekong affects a larger number of East Asian lives than the South China Sea, there would be less international interest on this issue.

Regardless of the cause of the lack of interest across the globe, it is clear that the Mekong has a significant role in modern society, particularly in terms of understanding China’s overseas relations.

China has 11 rivers on the Upper Mekong, which have been accused of exacerbating the drought river in 2019 by&nbsp, holding back&nbsp, “vast volumes of important water from flowing over”. China is the world’s only source of life, and China should be aware of this. However, the Mekong topic is only becoming more severe against the backdrop of culture change, which is already&nbsp, adversely impacting island Southeast Asia.

Although the South China Sea conflict is a major issue that merits all the special interest it is getting, it is still crucial to give the Mekong priority because it will be extremely important in Southeast Asia’s growth and the state’s relations with China for years to come.

Truston Yu ( [email protected] ) is a visiting student at the National University of Laos and holds a bachelor’s degree with first-class honors from the University of Hong Kong. They have written over 30 commentary pieces for publications like the Diplomat, the Jakarta Post, and the Islands Times.

This content was originally published by Pacific Forum, and it has since been republished. Learn the original&nbsp, around.

Continue Reading