BRICS currency won’t dislodge the dollar but is a threat

Could a new currency be set to challenge the dominance of the dollar? Perhaps, but that may not be the point.

In August 2023, South Africa will host the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – a group of nations known by the acronym BRICS. Among the items on the agenda is the creation of a new joint BRICS currency.

As a scholar who has studied the BRICS countries for over a decade, I can certainly see why talk of a BRICS currency is, well, gaining currency. The BRICS summit comes as countries across the world are confronting a changing geopolitical landscape that is challenging the traditional dominance of the West.

And while the BRICS countries have been seeking to reduce their reliance on the dollar for over a decade, Western sanctions on Russia after its invasion of Ukraine have accelerated the process.

Meanwhile, rising interest rates and the recent debt ceiling crisis in the US have raised concerns among other countries about their dollar-denominated debt and the demise of the dollar should the world’s leading economy ever default.

That all said, a new BRICS currency faces major hurdles before becoming a reality. But what currency discussions do show is that the BRICS countries are seeking to discover and develop new ideas about how to shake up international affairs and effectively coordinate policies around these ideas.

De-dollarization momentum?

With 88% of international transactions conducted in U.S. dollars, and the dollar accounting for 58% of global foreign exchange reserves, the dollar’s global dominance is indisputable. Yet de-dollarization – or reducing an economy’s reliance on the U.S. dollar for international trade and finance – has been accelerating following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The BRICS countries have been pursuing a wide range of initiatives to decrease their dependence on the dollar. Over the past year, Russia, China and Brazil have turned to greater use of non-dollar currencies in their cross-border transactions. Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are actively exploring dollar alternatives. And central banks have sought to shift more of their currency reserves away from the dollar and into gold.

All the BRICS nations have been critical of the dollar’s dominance for different reasons. Russian officials have been championing de-dollarization to ease the pain from sanctions.

Because of sanctions, Russian banks have been unable to use SWIFT, the global messaging system that enables bank transactions. And the West froze Russia’s US$330 billion in reserves last year.

Under a banner with Chinese letter and 'XIV BRICS SUMMIT' five screens show the face of five world leaders in front of flags.
BRICS leaders at the time of the 2022 summit. Li Tao/Xinhua via Getty Images

Meanwhile, the 2022 election in Brazil reinstated Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as president. Lula is a longtime proponent of BRICS who previously sought to reduce Brazil’s dependence on and vulnerability to the dollar. He has reenergized the group’s commitment to de-dollarization and spoken about creating a new Euro-like currency.

The Chinese government has also clearly laid out its concerns with the dollar’s dominance, labeling it “the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy.” Beijing directly blamed the Fed’s interest rate hike for causing turmoil in the international financial market and substantial depreciation of other currencies. Together with other BRICS countries, China has also criticized the use of sanctions as a geopolitical weapon.

The appeal of de-dollarization and a possible BRICS currency would be to mitigate such problems. Experts in the US are deeply divided on its prospects. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen believes the dollar will remain dominant as most countries have no alternative.

Yet a former White House economist sees a way that a BRICS currency could end dollar dominance.

Currency ambitions

Although talk of a BRICS currency has gained momentum, there is limited information on various models under consideration.

The most ambitious path would be something akin to the euro, the single-currency adopted by 11 member states of the European Union in 1999. But negotiating a single currency would be difficult given the economic power asymmetries and complex political dynamics within BRICS.

And for a new currency to work, BRICS would need to agree to an exchange rate mechanism, have efficient payment systems and a well-regulated, stable and liquid financial market. To achieve a global currency status, BRICS would need a strong track record of joint currency management to convince others that the new currency is reliable.

A BRICS version of the Euro is unlikely for now; none of the countries involved show any desire to discontinue its local currency. Rather, the goal appears to be to create an efficient integrated payment system for cross-border transactions as the first step and then introduce a new currency.

Building blocks for this already exist. In 2010, the BRICS Interbank Cooperation Mechanism was launched to facilitate cross-border payments between BRICS banks in local currencies. BRICS nations have been developing “BRICS pay” – a payment system for transactions among the BRICS without having to convert local currency into dollars.

And there has been talk of a BRICS cryptocurrency and of strategically aligning the development of Central Bank Digital Currencies to promote currency interoperability and economic integration. Since many countries expressed an interest in joining BRICS, the group is likely to scale its de-dollarization agenda.

From BRICS vision to reality

To be sure, some of the group’s most ambitious past initiatives to set up major BRICS projects to parallel non-Western infrastructures have failed. Big ideas like developing a BRICS credit rating agency and creating a BRICS undersea cable never materialized.

And de-dollarization efforts have been struggling both at the multilateral and bilateral levels. In 2014, when the BRICS countries launched the New Development Bank, its founding agreement outlined that its operations may provide financing in the local currency of the country in which the operation takes place.

Yet, in 2023, the bank remains heavily dependent on the dollar for its survival. Local currency financing represents around 22% of the bank’s portfolio, although its new president hopes to increase that to 30% by 2026.

The drive to de-dollarize is gathering pace. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Similar challenges exist in bilateral de-dollarization pursuits. Russia and India have sought to develop a mechanism for trading in local currencies, which would enable Indian importers to pay for Russia’s cheap oil and coal in rupees. However, talks were suspended after Moscow cooled on the idea of rupee accumulation.

Despite the barriers to de-dollarization, the BRICS group’s determination to act should not be dismissed – the group has been known for defying expectations in the past.

Despite many differences among the five countries, the bloc managed to develop joint policies and survive major crises such as the 2020-21 China-India border clashes and the war in Ukraine. BRICS has deepened its cooperation, invested in new financial institutions and has been continuously broadening the range of policy issues it addresses.

It now has a huge network of interlinked mechanisms that connect governmental officials, businesses, academics, think tanks and other stakeholders across countries.

Even if there is no movement on the joint currency front, there are multiple issues on which BRICS finance ministers as well as central bankers regularly coordinate – and the potential for developing new financial collaborations is particularly strong.

No doubt, talk of a new BRICS currency in itself is an important indicator of the desire of many nations to diversify away from the dollar. But I believe focusing on the BRICS currency risks missing the forest for the trees.

A new global economic order will not emerge out of a new BRICS currency or de-dollarization happening overnight. But it can potentially emerge out of BRICS’ commitment to coordinating their policies and innovating – something this currency initiative represents.

Mihaela Papa, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Sustainable Development and Global Governance, The Fletcher School, Tufts University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

G7 leaders must resist US calls for more protectionism

The Group of Seven Summit taking place in Japan this weekend could herald the start of a new era of global protectionism as the US continues its push for a G7-wide “screening of outbound investments” to China in certain cutting-edge technologies.

The European Union and the UK are also reported to be discussing a reinforcement of export controls on semiconductors and other technology that is regarded as critical to China.

As leaders of the world’s seven largest so-called “advanced” economies, which dominate global trade and the international financial system, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who was in Japan last week for a meeting of finance ministers, has said, “Obviously, it would be most effective if there’s coordinated action by a group of like-minded countries and agreement that this is a useful approach.”

She added that the United States would continue “informal” discussions on the measures with other G7 members, which are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the UK.

The existing restrictions to China from the US and others have already led to a sharp fall in high-end tech exports, and with geopolitical competitions between the US and China seemingly intensifying, it is likely Western countries, led by America, will impose further export controls on new sectors and industries. These could include biopharma, biotech, and agricultural products, such as seeds.

While clearly every country needs to look out for its own interests in all levels, I am skeptical about the creeping protectionism and urge political and business leaders to pursue a safe and secure form of globalization.

As we have borne witness to in recent decades, globalization promotes economic growth by facilitating the free flow of goods, services, and capital across borders. When countries open up to international trade, they access larger markets, benefit from economies of scale, and attract foreign investment. This, in turn, leads to increased productivity, job creation, and higher living standards.

Also, critically, it encourages the exchange of ideas, knowledge and technologies among countries. It allows for the transfer of best practices, encourages innovation through competition, and facilitates international collaboration on research and development. 

Through allowing the import of goods and services from different countries, consumers typically gain access to a wider range of products at competitive prices. On the other hand, protectionist measures restrict choices, limit competition, and raise prices for consumers.

Globalization has the potential to lift millions of people out of poverty. By integrating into the global economy, developing countries can attract foreign investment, access new markets, and diversify their economies. 

In addition, a rejection of protectionism fosters international cooperation and diplomacy. By engaging in open trade and maintaining strong economic ties, G7 members can build mutually beneficial relationships with other nations.

This can lead to improved diplomatic relations, increased stability, and enhanced collaboration on global challenges such as climate change, cybersecurity, and public health.

While globalization has its challenges, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. By embracing globalization and rejecting protectionism, G7 members can contribute to a more prosperous, interconnected, and peaceful world.

Nigel Green is founder and CEO of deVere Group. Follow him on Twitter @nigeljgreen.

Continue Reading

Ukraine investment safer bet than Silicon Valley

Investing in Ukrainian private companies, especially in existing dynamic small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), is becoming a safer bet than chasing venture-capital startups and the next unicorn à la notorious serial VC investor Marc Andreessen after the collapse of Santa Clara, California–based Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). While shareholders and bondholders of the $200-billion-plus bank financing high-risk venture-capital […]Continue Reading

Shoichiro Toyoda, 1925-2023: a personal remembrance 

Shoichiro Toyoda, president of Toyota Motor from 1982 to 1992 and chairman from 1992 to 1999, passed away February 14. He was 97. Dr Toyoda (he held a doctorate in engineering and everybody called him doctor) was one of the first auto executives I interviewed upon moving to Japan in the mid-1980s. Little did I […]Continue Reading

Modi calls for unity at G20 dominated by Ukraine

Borrell will meet on the sidelines of the New Delhi summit with Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang, where he will seek assurances that Beijing will not lend support to Russia’s war effort. “Until now, the answer has been clearly stated by China, ‘it hasn’t happened and it won’t happen,’ butContinue Reading