Distress

SINGAPORE: A person who abused five animals in Ang Mo Kio, killing two of them by throwing them off open housing stones, has been sentenced to 14 weeks ‘ prison.

Barrie Lin Pengli, 32, was given a time to which he was not entitled to keep any creature property after his release from prison.

He previously admitted guilt to three felonies of animal cruelty against neighborhood cat, with two additional felonies being taken into account.

The trial had sought 24 weeks ‘ prison for Lin, calling his steps one of Singapore’s worst instances of animal cruelty.

The defense had requested a maximum sentence of nine to ten months in prison. This was mainly due to Lin’s significant depressive disorder, which was discovered to have contributed to his crimes.

In sentencing on Friday ( Feb 7 ), deputy principal district judge Kessler Soh said,” These were abhorrent acts that caused public disquiet.”

The prosecutor recognised that Lin suffered from a psychological condition at the time, but said that his “horrific” behavior deserved punishment however.

One of Lin’s crimes was also committed while he was already receiving mental therapy, and out on parole while being investigated. Judge Soh argued that this crime warranted a higher word.

However, based on the words in previous similar circumstances, the prison phrase sought by the trial appeared to be” significantly excessive”, said the judge.

Judge Soh likewise took into account Lin’s history of reoffending since December 2021 and his “good” chances of recovery.

The prosecutors requested more time to consider whether to file an appeal against the word, and the court will be informed on February 11.

THE Event

Prior to this hearing, Lin was alleged to have abused animals to cope with his mental suffering between 2019 and 2020.

When he was angry or frustrated, he would wander through the Ang Mo Kio housing and development board ( HDB) estates, where he was aware that there were more community cats and “options to harm the cats” in order to calm down.

He first fanned the cat. In addition, he eventually managed to capture one to three animals in little, watertight bags that he put in his car at once. When the bags were sealed, little to no heat could provide.

On April 21, 2020, at around 3.30 am, Lin killed a black and white rabbit by dropping it from the 12th ground of Block 572, Ang Mo Kio Avenue 3.

He was caught on police surveillance video taking a raise and holding the rabbit by the scruff of its chest.

A list of missing animals, compiled by the Cat Welfare Society and based on reports from neighborhood cat feeds, was delivered to NParks two days later.

More area animals were missing from HDB lands in Ang Mo Kio, according to the feeder.

On May 15, 2020, even around 3.30am, Lin found a dark-coloured rabbit at the space board of Block 645, Ang Mo Kio Avenue 6 and threw it off the seventh floor.

When he reached the cat’s owner, he discovered that it was still intact. He stomped difficult on its neck, killing it.

Authorities cameras caught him removing the carcass. The kitten was found to have died from an outside blunt-force trauma incident when it was recovered.

The authorities also learned that a cat had been killed by falling from the same wall according to an observer statement that day.

Lin’s recognition was discovered during investigation, and the following morning, the authorities detained him.

Between December 2020 and June 2021, he was released on bail and treated psychologically. His depression signs got better, and he got a full-time career.

But, on Dec 26, 2021, after sending some companions house from a meeting at his position, he went up to Block 645, Ang Mo Kio Avenue 6.

At around 5.15am, he wandered around the property to see if he could manage his instincts to harm cats.

He grabbed a kitten and hit it twice against a wall before losing control of the fledgling. An observer contacted NParks to report the incident.

Community cat feeder found the kitten on December 28, 2021, and referred it to a specialist. It had a cut on its chin, a broken arm, a tooth, and a damaged limb that was discovered.

The kitten was hospitalised for 14 days and received operation. It is anticipated to long-term gout at its hip.

At past hearings, Lin’s prosecutor said the offences took place during a “tumultuous time in his living” when he was facing stressors like employment, family conflict and economic pressures.

Mr Azri Imran Tan even argued that Lin’s enrollment about the mistreatment went further than “ordinary participation” with the government, and that he was truly remorseful.

The prosecutor argued that the word sought by the trial may be” crushing” for Lin, a first-time-offender, and not in compliance with his past history and future hopes.

The greatest punishment for causing needless pain and suffering to an animal is 18 months in jail, a S$ 15, 000 good, or both.

In a statement released after the sentencing, the National Parks Board ( NParks ) said it received an average of 1, 200 allegations of animal cruelty each year from 2019 to 2024.

No more than 6 % of the cases per season were substantiated as works of animal cruelty and abuse, according to Ms. Jessica Kwok, NParks team director for protection and analysis.” We had investigated each of the situations completely.

While other criminals received warning words or structure charges, the most severe circumstances were prosecuted in court.

NParks has begun a review of the Animals and Birds Act, which will include making sure its strict penalties stay strong and you effectively deter and punish dog violence.

Members of the public can report suspected cases of bird cruelty to NParks online&nbsp, or by calling 1800-476-1600.

Continue Reading

LIM and SELF DID NOT DISCUSS HER: LIM

On Wednesday, Lim was questioned about his recall of his discussions with the person by the defense, led by Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng.

Lim said that all three discussions on Nov 16, Nov 18 and Nov 23, 2021 were about work, and that in the person’s information, she” coloured” the sessions as though they were social activities.

He did not discuss any possible jobs or contracts to represent her, saying that he needed more time to examine her personality and potential positions in the field.

He was responding to Mr. Tan’s inquiries about the woman’s testimony that Lim asked her if she would have sex with someone to bring about change and do a sex work on a director at their next meeting.

Lim said that such “inappropriate” and “unprofessional” notes would not be made at a job meeting, and that if he had said this, the person would not have met him a second time.

He said” no female skills” would become willing to work with someone who asks such issues, and that it was “out of character” for him to do so as the purpose of the meeting was to work with her,” not frighten her off”.

Lim claimed she” twisted” his claim about “how connection may change the situation for two people” and that she had asked why people seemed to change around her after she became romantic with them.

He also disagreed with the person’s evidence that they had talked about the “five qualities” needed to be successful in the entertainment business, including devotion.

At their next meeting, the woman claimed that discussing having intercourse to bring about change and making sacrifices to be successful brought up when the admitted molestation took place.

WHAT HAPPENED AT THIRD MEETING

The second appointment lasted two days from about 9.40pm to 11.45pm on Nov 23, 2021. Lim said the date and time was set based on the person’s presence.

Mr Tan retraced the victim’s account of this meeting, which she gave during her evidence in a sealed judge, and asked Lim for his answer.

The girl claimed that during the meeting, Lim frequently touched on the five characteristics and put a premium on the part about surrender because she did not provide a definitive response to that.

She claimed that she understood that this was a “figure of speech” and that he was making the same place because she would refuse or remain silent until she accepted a well out of anger.

Lim responded that there was no such conversation, and that if the person did not like what she was hearing, she may have stopped and left the meeting quickly.

He even criticized the claims made by her friends, who claimed she claimed Lim had asked her to do a sex work on him, as “ridiculous.”

The woman claimed that Lim asked her to love him after moving from his head to the couch because he wanted to evaluate her capacity to give a performance.

Lim strongly refuted this happening, saying that he had never heard of them having to love during a screen test in his years of managing artistes.

” She might be thinking we’re producing videos like Basic Instinct, Game of Thrones, or Gender and the City. But the fact of the matter is in Singapore, we’re talking about displays like Under One Top, Phua Chu Kang, Ah Boys to Men.

” Being able to love on display is so unimportant. It’s simply a convenient reason she’s providing to help her argument, “he said.

The woman claimed that after one more passionate kiss with Lim, she felt horrified and that he had asked her to test again.

The girl claims that Lim was seated on her remaining on the seat at the time of the following love. She said her left hand was on his right cheek, and Lim’s right shoulder was over her head.

According to the woman, in this place, Lim allegedly reached his right arm over her throat and into her stomach.

Lim denied kissing or touching the person badly, and questioned why he would try something so” impossible” that had hurt his reputation.

He added that he had tried to recreate this scenario but found it to be illogical from a performance standpoint.

Instead of trying to perform a shot to such an extent that difficulty, he would be using the gratis, left hand, which is unlikely to be involved in the unlikely event that anyone is interested in groping her breast.

He added that it was difficult to perform like a move because he only had short hands and his hands weren’t quite long.

The girl agreed that the situation was odd during her cross-examination with the defense, but that someone who wanted to abduct another person may try their hardest.

” FELT BETTER” AFTER FINDING CCTV Film: LIM

Giving his account of the gathering, Lim said that after the lady arrived, they talked about several matters including her be” struck on “at function and the way she smiles, which she had asked Lim about before.

Lim said they likewise spent a lot of time talking about the woman’s obvious drawings, which he described as obvious and depicts body, pain, and being tied up with cords.

The girl was resentful of her work, but Lim said it was “degrading to women.” He claimed that he had shown her another artist’s picture of two men kissing as an illustration of how her work could be provocative without causing any controversy.

The woman then claimed she needed to get home, and Lim said he drove her a short distance outside the building to waited for her journey.

Lim claimed that he had told the woman to practice accepting censure in his car.

After parking outside the tower, Lim claimed that he and Lim stepped out of the car and waited with her while they exchanged a brief hello.

Mr. Tan questioned Lim if the woman next displayed signs of distress or contempt, and Lim replied low.

The woman was waiting for her ride outside his car, which was parked outside the building, and the defense then played closed-circuit television (CCTV ) footage of Lim and her.

The woman gave Lim a area hug before they entered their separate cars, according to the surveillance video from the victim’s car when it arrived.

According to the girl, Lim hugged her up. However, Lim claimed that he was surprised by her cuddle because he had never met her and that he had only apologised for it.

After being interrogated by his officers on December 6, 2021, Lim claimed to have found this Video footage himself.

” I looked at it, I felt a lot better because it plainly shows that nothing has happened, “he said.

He said he would have reacted differently to the woman’s hug if” something ( had ) happened”, and that from the CCTV footage, the woman did not appear afraid or traumatised.

The prosecution continues.

Continue Reading

SINGAPORE: A man who permanently injured his colleague while massaging him was fined S$ 3, 000 ( US$ 2, 230 ) on Monday ( Jan 27 ). &nbsp,

Ng Jian Ye Eugene, 32, admitted to causing severe harm as a result of an omission that endangered some ‘ personal protection. The victim’s throat was twisted, causing him to sputter or pressure during a phone call at their place of employment. &nbsp,

Mr. Suang Wijaya and  Mr. Hamza Malik from Eugene Thuraisingam LLP noted that he had represented Singapore in Wushu in his prevention appeal. He received instruction from his coach in sports massage, and he also practices Muay Thai and massage for his friends and coworkers often. &nbsp,

The defense claimed that” these treatments are intended to and had helped his colleagues and friends with their discomfort, pain, and muscle symptoms.” &nbsp,

On November 11, 2022, Ng approached the prey from behind while the victim was using a microphone to speak to a client on the phone in the office. &nbsp,

He placed one finger on the top of the victim’s mind and the other on the victim’s neck, and then twisted the victim’s chest once in a circular path and once in an anti-clockwise way.

Ng had massaged the victim several days at the latter’s request, and had massaged him in” the regular way” on the day of the event, the army claimed. &nbsp,

Since the victim, 31, was on a call, he did not react and Ng walked away. &nbsp,

The victim later complained of discomfort in his neck after the call ended, so he went to a clinic later that evening. There, he was diagnosed with a sprained neck and given five days of medical leave. &nbsp,

The victim was directed to have an MRI scan on November 16, 2022, which revealed several levels of disc desiccation. He continued to feel pain in his neck. &nbsp,

Disc desiccation is the gradual loss of hydration, or water, from an intervertebral disc in the spine. &nbsp,

On November 24, 2022, the victim consulted an orthopaedic surgeon who determined that he had suffered a cervical sprain or strain. Additionally, the doctor determined that the victim did not have pre-existing conditions and gave him a hospitalization leave until Jan. 25, 2024. &nbsp,

The victim informed the human resources department of their employer about the incident, and the department said they would treat their report as an accident at work, which might allow him to receive compensation from the Ministry of Manpower ( MOM) for the cost of his medical treatment. &nbsp,

The company, TDCX, objected to an assessment that&nbsp, the victim had sustained a permanent incapacity. The Work Injury Compensation Board finalized the assessment of” 15 per cent permanent incapacity” in September 2023 after MOM referred him to a specialist panel. &nbsp,

On December 8 of that year, the victim reported to the police. &nbsp,

The defense referred to a letter from a mutual friend who met the victim a month after the incident as a reassuring factor. In her testimony, she claimed that the victim “acted completely normally” and “did not show any signs of distress”. &nbsp,

The defence noted that this was a more superficial observation, but stressed that” contemporaneous” observation should be taken into account. &nbsp,

Due to the unsigned and undated nature of the document, Deputy Public Prosecutor Melissa Heng urged the court to not give weight to the letter from this testimony. &nbsp,

She continued, stating that this does not constitute proof that the victim was actually not in any distress or pain at the time. The medical report provided the most reliable information regarding the victim’s injuries. &nbsp,

Even though Ng had massaged coworkers or people close to him, he was still a novice masseuse, according to Ms Heng, who added that the workplace is not a place for a proper massage. &nbsp,

Up to two years in prison, a fine of up to S$ 5, 000, or both are the penalties for causing grievous harm to anyone for a negligent act.

Continue Reading