Issuing limits for Singapore government securities, Treasury bills raised to S.5 trillion

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

FISCAL POSITION IS NOT APPLICABLE RAISING LIMIT.

Additionally, he claimed that government expenses are not funded by the proceeds from these assets ‘ release.

According to him,” the government does not use for systemic spending needs, so as not to burden our upcoming generations who will have to pay the debt incurred by current and former generations.”

The president’s fiscal location is not affected by the increase in the spending cap.

Under the Significant Infrastructure Government Loan Act ( SINGA ), Singapore only borrows money to finance nationally significant infrastructure projects, unlike other nations do so for recurring spending.

Less than 2 % of the total amount borrowed by SINGA is actually made up by the state, and SINGA has a different loans cap. &nbsp,

Mr Chee added that Singapore’s total debt-to-GDP amount may seem large, but it does not fully reveal the country’s economic position as it does not regard Singapore’s assets, which outweigh its debts.

Continue Reading

Rubio brings China Realism to the State Department – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Marco Rubio will be the next Secretary of State in the following Trump presidency, according to press reports.

The senior senator from Florida offers as a vocal China hawk, like the whole of his Democratic gathering, but with a essential difference: In September, Rubio published a 60-page statement,” The World China Made“, with a complete and painstakingly researched study of China’s financial success.

Some observers have already speculated that Nixon’s 1972 China trip might be influenced by the hiring of a seasoned China hawk like Rubio.

According to this theory, Secretary of State Rubio could negotiate with China without making any claims that he would sell out, and Secretary of State Rubio could do the same. Without second-guessing the incoming president’s negotiating strategy with China, Rubio’s published thoughts about China speak for themselves.

Full disclosure: the report cites Asia Times and this writer in particular, including our groundbreaking analysis of China’s export success in the Global South. By creating supply chains for Vietnam, Mexico, India, and other nations for export to the United States, China evaded Trump and Biden tariffs by building factories in third countries.

A bright line divides realists from Utopians among Washington’s China hawks. According to neoconservatives like Dan Blumenthal, well-known figures like Gordon Chang and Peter Zeihan, and real believers like former US Secretary of State and CIA director Michael Pompeo, China is about to collapse, and the US should prepare to do so militarily and economically.

If the US had shut down ZTE, he claimed, he would have led a group of unemployed engineers to march on Beijing and toppled Xi Jinping. A senior official from the first Trump administration told this writer in 2018 that the then-president had made a mistake by agreeing to that deal.

Realists on the other side of the coin may despise China and accuse it of scheming, but they acknowledge that it has made significant progress in both domestic and international trade. Rubio dismisses the utopian vision in the report’s conclusion as the best-informed among the realists:

Commentary on China’s economy swings wildly between extremes. On the one hand, the Chinese economy is often portrayed as deeply troubled, perhaps even on the verge of collapse. Stories in this vein emphasize China’s very high debt burden, slowing growth, distressed real-estate sector, and aging population—all real problems. In an interview with Time magazine in June, President Joe Biden made the claim that China’s economy is “on the brink.” ‘ …

China’s export- and manufacturing-oriented development model may have been successful enough in the short term to push the country toward the cutting-edge of technology, but not enough to enable it to overcome its structural issues over the long term. Many in Washington favor this narrative because it brings back our Cold War victory.

Then, a revolutionary, dynamic, and capitalist United States triumphed over a repressive regime with a dysfunctional, gerontocratic political class and a failed communist economic system incapable of navigating the information age. Our country’s past success has led to a similar triumph, which is tempting to believe. We win, they lose. But an invincible belief in one’s own success is a recipe for complacency. And increasingly, this belief is at odds with the evidence in front of our faces.

Let’s say the United States ca n’t be complacent about Communist China if this report serves as a message. Think-tank scholars and economists may bank on China’s coming collapse. The wager is being flipped by Beijing. It believes that manufacturing, exports, and ‘ new quality productive forces’ are the keys to regime survival and indeed to the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”. It thinks that modern technology and production will help it maintain its communist system while achieving wealth.

It has succeeded so far in establishing an alternative development path. But suppose today is the high-water mark of China’s power. Even in such a promising world, the CCP will continue to be a real, existential threat to American workers and industry for years to come. Additionally, Communist China will continue to be a formidable adversary unlike anything the US has ever faced. The CCP’s project’s critics, who claim that it is doomed to fail, should bear the burden of proof at this point.

Some highlights from Rubio’s report include:

  • In terms of industrial robot installations, China is the world’s top installers, with more installed in 2022 than the rest of the world combined.
  • Given the size of China’s manufacturing workforce and wage levels in comparison to those of the United States, China’s robot density exceeded our own in 2021, a remarkable achievement.
  • China’s extensive 5G telecommunications network, which consists of more than 3 million 5G base stations, makes it a leader in smart manufacturing.
  • Chinese entrepreneurs are assisting China in overcoming its reliance on imported tools and robots. Despite record installations, China’s imports of industrial robots have declined the past two years. This is due to Chinese companies ‘ steadily expanding business, which are thought to have had a 35.5 % domestic market share. share in 2022, up from 17.5 % a decade ago. China’s position is even stronger in the incredibly fragmented machine-tool market, wherein Chinese manufacturers will account for nearly a third of global production in 2022.
  • Chinese businesses are establishing sophisticated factories that will enable them to enter foreign markets and halt criticism of export practices.

Rubio’s message is that the United States must make extraordinary efforts to stay ahead of China and that it should n’t believe that a pen-waving device can stop this technological behemoth.

It is not difficult to draw any conclusions about foreign policy based on this analysis.

Follow David P Goldman on X at @davidpgoldman

Continue Reading

Budget 2025: Falling short on economic dignity

By:
On:
In: Technology
  • Capex products: What the government will choose to spend money on and what the state will get.
  • Unless SMEs become more successful, pay will stay low for most staff

Often, we hear of the mismatch in salary expectations of fresh job seekers and starting salaries. The sad truth is that 60.8% of fresh graduates earned RM2,000 or less in 2010, and by 2021 – a good 11 years later – starting salaries were still RM2,000 or less for 59.6% of fresh graduates.

Budget 2025: Falling short on economic dignityThe 2025 resources is full of opinions and observations. What else can I contribute to what has already been said, then?

Maybe a reminder of what a resources, beyond the great bright numbers, really ought to reflect.

The latest administration, which had already established its principles in the Malaysia Madani perspective, emphasize six fundamental principles: sustainability, prosperity, development, respect, trust, and compassion, is currently in transition. However, Malaysia Madani was an “effort to travel and reestablish Malaysia’s dignity and splendor,” according to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim right away. “.

Anwar’s next year in business, with this being his second expenditure as prime minister and finance minister, was just one month away from releasing the 2025 Budget. The budget’s central point should then be financial dignity, &nbsp.

The typical prevent most commentaries pick on is the minimal fiscal room, with never-ending treatments of what the government ought to do to lessen the imbalance.

Despite our best efforts, we should remember that opex, which is the government’s obligation to pay for its businesses, including salaries and pensions, may be decreased in the near future. No matter how much, these obligations may be paid for. Therefore, the only series items that are of genuine effect moving forward would be the budget items – what the state is choosing to spend on, and what the nation will experience in return.

Choice issues, and the decisions made by this administration should be measured against the key factor, which is respect.

restoring what really counts

Lasting income:

The average wage of the bottom 50% of wage earners only went up by RM56 annually between 2010-2019. Economically speaking, this is society clearly signaling a depreciation for human capital.

Only the best 30 % of homeowners spend on ambitious goods and services, according to a recent statement from Khazanah Research Institute. If 70 % of us are merely trying to survive day by day, we may have a successful business.

Typically, we hear of the imbalance in earnings expectations of new job seekers and starting salaries. The sad truth is that 59.6 % of new graduates ‘ starting salaries were still RM2, 000 or less in 2010 and that 60.8 % of them earned less than that in 2021, which is still reasonably optimistic. Employers ( Okay, boomers ): are quick to point out that Gen Z are merely being impossible.

However, when inflation and living expenses are taken into account, we are basically telling our younger generation that they are for about half what they were in the previous century. Another depressing statistic is that between 2010 and 2019, the average salary for the lower 50 % of wage earners only increased by RM56 yearly. Financially speaking, this is community plainly signaling a loss for human funds.

The government attempts to control this by establishing a minimum wage, which is proposed in Budget 2025 to be increased to RM1, 700 per month starting on February 1st, 2025. Although RM1 700 is still far below what is considered to be a respectable wage, employers are now retaliating, as is expected.

]RM1 = US$ 0.227]

Most commentators fail to take into account the fact that pushing for higher wages is eventually hurt labor by encouraging companies to automate tasks that were previously performed by low-skilled workers ( For more information, see Alesina et al. Chu et al. ( 2018 ) ( 2020 ), Eckardt and Steffen ( 2021 ).

The state will need to reinvest yet more money in replacing the employees who have been replaced, which is a complex cycle. Although this should not serve as a cause for people to remain in low-skilled jobs, it does reduce the options for government legislation.

On the flip side, one should also consider if companies are only penny-pinching. According to data from the Department of Statistics Malaysia’s 2023 database, a fairer view may suggest that 96.9 % of our business organizations are unable to get much-needed capital.

Consider the fact that, according to Bank Negara Malaysia’s Monthly Highlights &amp, Statistics release, there were RM5.98 billion in mortgage programs for the manufacturing industry overall in September 2024. That is a RM2 billion gap in needed cash in just one month. It follows a similar style across various industries and through time.

This is in line with the rise in alternative fundraising ( i .e., peer-to-peer lending, equity crowdfunding, and venture capital ), which was valued at RM3.8 billion in 2023. The Securities Commission views this as a good, and rightfully so, but let’s also make sure we understand that these are RM3.8 billion worth of required funds that our businesses were never willing to fund.

The danger that lenders were unwilling to bear for P2P borrowing has now been transferred to the individual investors, who typically fall into the upper middle class and are above that level. Since P2P’s inception in Malaysia in 2017, regular people have provided SMEs with RM5.96 billion in total, with 98 % of the loans being working capital, compared to 2 % for business expansion. This may be no comfort if you are struggling with your pay test, but odds are your company is struggling also.

In summary, most of our workers wo n’t make much money unless our SMEs gain access to more capital and become more productive. Other than the request to restore small and medium banks, the budget specifically addresses these issues. The online banks may possibly fill these gaps, as several of them have announced the oncoming release of their company bank solutions specifically for SMEs.

Unsustainable family debts

The finance ministry is n’t all that worried, though, as our household debts totaled RM1.57 trillion as of June 2024, which is about 83.8 % of GDP. Countries like Australia, South Korea and Canada have household bills that exceed 100 % of GDP. However, no all debts are created equal.

Debts can be used as leverage to increase money for high-wage workers. With more Malaysians taking on next work, debt is good being used to finance fundamental needs. The funds grants additional cash assistance through the BUDI MADANI software despite numerous attempts to address this problem. One of a long series of overlapping social welfare programs, including those led by multiple functions, is this one. The best-case situation is these programmes provide some inhaling room but only a big programme like a Universal Basic Income can help restore the economic disparity within our society.

Given that our debt to GDP is now close to the self-imposed cap, the cost of funding for a program may be lower. I can just quote John Maynard Keynes ‘ wise statement,” Anything we can do, we may afford.”

Tax as an opportunity opposed duty as a sentence

Economics has a well-known proverb that says you get less from what you income. The idea is based on the idea that some activities can be dissuaded by income. By imposing levies on certain activities or goods, the government properly increases their charge, making them less appealing to individuals and businesses.

  1. Respect at work

Consider the proposal to provide a tax incentive for employers who adopt flexible working arrangements. Employees are clear that they strongly prefer flexible work arrangements. However, the findings are inconsistent. This is the a-wine-a-day research conundrum, in my opinion. For every research that says a glass of wine is good for you, you will be able to find another research that says otherwise. There are so many more benefits to providing a flexible work arrangement by default than just offering an office maintenance fee, the cost of commuter work, and the time and cost savings saved by parents with care-giving responsibilities. Instead of paying taxes on the ( few ) that choose to offer these incentives, the government should tax those who do n’t.

  1. Increasing productivity by maximising our human capital

Additionally, imposing a tax penalty will help with hiring women to work again. We should tax bad behavior rather than encourage good behavior. Not hiring a person because she has not worked for a certain period and has a gap in her resume is discrimination. Another issue is the specific tax incentive that applies to software costs when “implementing flexible work arrangements” is implemented. The government should n’t encourage remote employee monitoring with intrusive software.

  1. Carbon tax

The carbon tax’s introduction is both opportune and welcomed. With the introduction of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism ( CBAM ), particularly for our steel industry, carbon taxes will be a burden on us in some way or another.

If we are going to have to pay, we might as well collect it ourselves. It is proposed that the proceeds from this carbon tax will support the development of decarbonization research. Without any information on the tax rate, it is impossible to predict the amount of revenue this will generate. Singapore imposes a carbon tax of SG$ 25/tCO2e currently, but started off at just SG$ 5/tCO2e. If we introduce a rate of RM5/tCO2e ( which is incredibly low ), the energy sector will receive about RM1.4 billion in tax revenue based on emissions from 2022.

The Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers ( FMM) has already expressed concern about the potential rise in electricity tariffs, but more details on the carbon tax should be forthcoming. &nbsp,

I do n’t understand how energy producers can absorb this without passing some of it on to consumers, given that 81 % of our electricity still comes from fossil fuel sources. Given that our energy mix is so low in carbon, there may be a carbon tax that can be levied at the production, distribution, or consumption stages.

Other areas worth mentioning

The Budget 2025 participants in the EV infrastructure industry probably feel a little underwhelmed. Other than the announcement of a sub-RM100k EV, there was no mention at all on further incentives for building out our EV charging infrastructure.

  1. Charge Point Operators experience no love.

The Budget 2025 participants in the EV infrastructure industry probably feel a little underwhelmed. Other than the announcement of a sub-RM100k EV, there was no mention at all on further incentives for building out our EV charging infrastructure.

I’ve previously covered the industry gripes, but my colleagues have a different perspective. A transition to electric vehicles is almost unavoidable, it is safe to say. That being so, we should be able to anticipate that all these vehicles need to be charged while idle ( i. e. overnight, while parked ), and not during transit.

I doubt any of these players will realize a return on their investments due to the rush to construct EV chargers along highways and in public spaces. Most people do n’t seem to understand this, but imagine a time when all EVs will be used in cars. Everyone is going to expect that they can charge their vehicles overnight, the same way we charge our phones and laptops to have it ready to go again the next day.

The main issue will be having enough energy capacity to charge millions of cars overnight, despite the fact that we can outfit every parking bay in every condominium and apartment building in the nation. Energy production and grid capacity are both at issue, not charging-pillar issues.

Ecological fiscal transfer gets a boost

    Half of the Ecological Fiscal Transfer Fund allocation - RM125 million- will be contingent on the performance of state government expenditures related to environmental preservation.

    The Ecological Fiscal Transfer Fund is proposed to increase from RM200 million to RM250 million, which is a 25 % increase, in Budget 2025. This boost is intended to aid state initiatives to protect wildlife and forests. Half of the allocation ( RM125 million ) will be contingent on the performance of state government expenditures related to environmental preservation. Additionally, the Orang Asli community received RM80 million to train and hire 2,500 forest rangers. a positive move.

    Overall, I feel the government is attempting to be bold but is doing it in liberal doses. Will this budget encourage everyone’s economic dignity and help them hit the reset button? Not entirely. In fact, I think many people will have further concerns on how the subsidy rationalisation will affect them, partly self-inflicted by announcements of the plan, without the actual plan itself in place.

    Continue Reading

    How China may react to Trump’s threat and bluster – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    Donald Trump did make his four-year foreign policy statement when he comes back to the White House.

    US citizens have chosen a president who adheres to an” America First” process, where US interests come initially, and is expected to be more separatist than the current president, Joe Biden.

    While some unusual officials, including Hungarian Prime Minister&nbsp, Viktor Orban&nbsp, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, may welcome a second Trump administration, the same cannot be said about Chinese President Xi Jinping.

    A Trump presidency back in the White House is unlikely to be great news for China, which has had worsening ties with the US since Trump’s first president.

    China’s economic difficulties

    In July 2018, Trump fought a never-before-seen trade war with the second-largest economy in the world and imposed tariffs that ranged from 25 % to 25 % on Chinese imports into the US.

    But during his 2024 plan remarks, Trump suggested that US tariffs on Chinese products could go as high as 60 % or more.

    China’s economy is in a slump, with slumping house prices, great local authorities debt and higher youth unemployment. More tariffs might ruin China’s economic treatment strategy, which depends greatly on exports.

    However, a second Trump administration may not be the only thing Beijing worries about. China’s ambitions to lead the world Artificial market by 2030 are likely to be constrained by a Trump-led US, which would likely restrict the flow of engineering from the US or Europe to China.

    The fresh US management may also use an economic decoupling approach to “derisk” itself from Chinese coverage. By shifting its supply chain somewhere, this may aim to reduce US dependence on China and stifle US investment there.

    While Joe Biden’s prior high tariffs certainly strained relations between Trump and Beijing, the Russia-Ukraine war is another factor that severely damaged Sino-US relations. Beijing has threatened to sue China for aiding Russia in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and has accused it of supporting Moscow.

    Luckily for Russia, a next Trump administration may turn the tide in Moscow’s pursuit. The transfer of Ukranian property that is already occupied by Russia might be included in a Trump-negotiated peace agreement. Trump may also slash or lift sanctions against Russia because the newly elected president-elect has” no passion for punishment.”

    Beijing wants a strong alliance in Russia to counteract a world order led by the US and prevent Russia from focusing its attention on Ukraine in the event that Russia apparently fails to accept its conquest of Ukraine. But as the “dealmaker-in-chief” and leading proponent of an” America First” mission, what does Trump stand to gain from helping Russia?

    Second, because Russia has grown increasingly dependent on China, Beijing’s effect in Russia could be undermined by helping it overcome its diplomatic and economic problems. Secondly, as a Russian-backed Iran affects US involvement in the Middle East, a new Trump administration may agent a Russian-Ukrainian peace authority that sees Russia withhold military aid from Iran and the latter’s local friends, such as Hezbollah.

    As Iran’s influence in the region diminishes, Washington may open up more solutions tied up in the Middle East and refocus its resources elsewhere, such as China, if Washington so wishes. And that may destroy China’s socioeconomic recovery more.

    And what future for Taiwan?

    Trump has stated ambiguously whether he would support Taiwan in the event of a Taiwanese war, in contrast to Biden. There are, however, concerns that Trump might break with China and apply Taiwan as a negotiations chip, or even leave the island entirely.

    Trump expressed anger over Taiwan’s” stolen” of the US semiconductor industry and claims that the island may pay more for its defence. However, his disagreement with Taiwan is not the main point.

    If Beijing invaded Taiwan, Trump has indicated that he may impose tariffs on Chinese goods of up to 20 %. Given China’s financial difficulties and President Xi’s have to&nbsp, prove&nbsp, his value as a leader whose prestige and power are &nbsp, comparable&nbsp, to the creator of the People’s Republic of China, Mao Zedong, Xi may consider this a valuable business.

    Beijing is likely to form relationships outside of the Western world as China prepares for difficulties brought on by a subsequent Trump presidency. As China lessens its reliance on the West for exports and investments, it may become more involved with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( GAL ) and the Gulf Cooperation Council ( GCC).

    If the Middle Eastern regime’s aid declines, China may also talk to Iran. After all, more US sources in the Middle East may mean less sources to deal with the&nbsp,” Foreign risk”.

    One issue that may make Trump concerned about Taiwan coming under Beijing’s manage, even if he does like the US to make more, is that the isle manufactures 60 % of all semiconductors. This product is essential for the global use of AI and electronics.

    Elon Musk’s place in Trump’s second term is still a mystery. If Trump wins a second term, Musk would head a government efficiency commission.

    What part does Musk play in bridging the Washington-Beijing divide, though, given that his Tesla electric cars are heavily dependent on the Chinese market and that Tesla has a factory there?

    Chee Meng Tan is assistant professor of business economics, University of Nottingham

    The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Continue Reading

    Trump tariffs threaten to torpedo the yuan – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    Since Donald Trump’s November 5 vote gain, the Chinese yuan has traded below the main company’s fixing level. As the past and future US leader prepares to start large new trade wars, the evidence suggests that the markets are anticipating a weaker yuan.

    A sensible assumption? Not sure if Gongsheng, the government of the People’s Bank of China, has anything to say about it. Pan and, for the time being, President Xi Jinping, want a steady trade rate versus the dollar.

    The prominent one is assurance. A significant decrease in the renminbi could indicate to global investors that Asia’s largest economy is facing a serious issue in addition to a terrible property crisis, a growing deflation, and a significant capital flight.

    The string, though, is how Trump’s coming trade war may include Team Xi scrambling to make money depreciation excellent again.

    ” Donald Trump’s win … is ushering in a new cycle of stress on the Foreign money”, says Wei He, an scientist at Gavekal Research.

    What will happen if Trump implements his threats of fresh taxes after taking office in January, the main topic is. In this situation, it is very doubtful that the yen will be at its present level”, He said.

    After Trump began imposing tariffs in 2018, the PBOC allowed a 13 % loss of the yuan in get” to largely restore trade competitiveness”, He says. So, it is “very likely” that it will allow depreciation once more, especially given the recent policy shift toward supporting local demand.

    Again, this is n’t the most likely scenario as yuan internationalization&nbsp, has been a top Xi priority. Xi’s strategy to expand the dollar’s world use in finance and trade may be hampered by a weaker exchange rate.

    In&nbsp, 2016, China&nbsp, won a place for the renminbi in the International Monetary Fund’s” special&nbsp, drawing&nbsp, right” box joining the dollar, yen, euro and pound. In the decades since, the stock’s usage has soared. Excessive exchange-rate interference then may dent confidence in the yuan, slowing its hinge toward reserve-currency standing.

    At the same time, a falling yuan may increase the odds greatly indebted Chinese firms, including giant home designers, default on their international currency-denominated off-shore debts. That may improve the chance of new problems involving the China Evergrande Group and a Chinese asset dump.

    The US Federal Reserve cutting costs as well as the monetary easing needed to support the dollar’s declines may harm Beijing’s deleveraging attempts, in part because of it. Xi’s inner group has made significant strides in eradicating economic abuse over the past few years.

    That clarifies why Xi and Premier Li Qiang have been afraid to actively lower prices in the face of mounting negative forces.

    Not surprisingly, the” PBOC now appears to be slowly renewing its defence of the money through large state-owned business banks”, says Gavekal’s He.

    But if Xi switched program, it would destroy two unexpected dynamics.

    One, it may produce Trump’s head explode, artistically speaking. He might retaliate by levying even higher taxes on mainland goods than the 20 % that all products entering the United States must pay are already telegraphed and the 60 % that all other countries have already telegraphed.

    ” If Trump does began a major industry war, China does, however, hit again, targeting American companies with interests in China, selling US bonds, devaluing the yuan and targeting US imports of agricultural items”, says Evie Aspinalla, a director&nbsp, at the British Foreign Policy Group think tank. ” It would have a significant impact on global trade. China, if it can, would rather avoid this, but if Trump follows through on his trade rhetoric, a tit-for-tat trade war seems all but inevitable”.

    Trump, Aspinalla adds, has been “incredibly forthright throughout the campaign on his views on China, not least in his threats to impose 60 % tariffs on China. China, meanwhile, &nbsp, has pledged to continue to work with the US based on the&nbsp, principles of mutual respect, peaceful co-existence and win-win cooperation, claiming there are’ no winners’ in a trade war. 60 % tariffs would cripple the Chinese economy, which would put a strain on China’s ability to compete.

    That threatened 60 % maneuver alone, UBS&nbsp, Group estimates, will cut China’s annual growth by more than half – chopping 2.5 percentage points off the gross domestic product ( GDP ) of the globe’s top trading nation. Due to sluggish retail spending, property investment, and new home sales, China increased only 4.6 % in the third quarter, up from 4.6 % last year.

    A weaker yuan would have a negative impact on a region that is still too dependent on exports for comfort. As UBS&nbsp, economist Wang Tao warns, there’s a “risk of other countries raising tariffs on imports from China as well”, triggering a new wave of retaliatory trade curbs. A weaker yuan may also sway Asian governments to join the bottom-skinned nations.

    In the past, Beijing’s beggar-thy-neighbor proclivities put officials from Tokyo to Jakarta on the spot. The top destination for Asian goods is by far China. A weaker yuan might spur regional governments to carry out the biggest devaluations since the Asian crisis of 1997-1998.

    Stephen&nbsp, Innes, strategist at SPI Asset Management, notes that” the stakes are sky-high” if Trump goes full steam ahead with tariffs. ” For China”, he says,” the regional economic heavyweight, the options are stark: either devalue the yuan to protect exports or unleash a massive fiscal stimulus to spark domestic demand. A 60 % tariff could trigger a jaw-dropping 30%-45 % yuan devaluation, pushing dollar-yen&nbsp, skyward, possibly even past the 175 mark”.

    For Asia, Innes adds,” a roaring dollar could spell disaster. The lifeblood of Asia’s emerging markets is local currency debt, which has lost all gains due to previous dollar surges. Some economies may experience a chokehold as a result of their significant external debts in US dollars. The Trump effect is a high-stakes gamble that could transform the financial landscape for years to come, despite Trump’s victory setting Wall Street on fire.

    Context matters, of course, and most Asian economies are n’t approaching the Trumpian storm to come from a position of strength. Due to sluggish retail sales, weak business investment, and soft industrial production, Japan’s GDP continues to decline quarter after quarter. Hence the Bank of Japan’s reluctance to hike short-term rates above 0.25 %.

    Political chaos is also raging in Japan. The Liberal Democratic Party lost absolute power late last month, marking the third straight year since 1955. With the assistance of coalition partners, the LDP and Shigeru Ishiba were able to snag control and the title of premier. On Monday, the parliament voted to let Ishiba stay on as Japan’s leader. He will now lead a minority Japanese government.

    In Seoul, South Korean President&nbsp, Yoon&nbsp, Suk Yeol is struggling with a 19 % approval rating. Korea struggles to cope with record household debt, which slows down growth. Notably, Korea’s economy is dominated by a handful of giant, export-driven family-owned conglomerates whose profits are uniquely vulnerable to a new trade war.

    Central bank officials in Taiwan are struggling with a housing bubble. Indonesia’s economy struggles to stop growing. Artificial intelligence is putting a strain on the Philippines ‘ vital call center sector, which is rapidly expanding. Singapore is having a cost-of-living crisis. Political conflict is preventing economic reforms in Thailand.

    All of this implies that many Asian economies will import tariffs from countries already in place. China, too, as a massive property crisis drags on and increases the odds of deflation.

    Jeremy Zook, an analyst at Fitch Ratings, says,” the potential exacerbation of current supply and demand trends, coupled with demographic and debt overhang challenges, poses a risk of sustained price falls”.

    Chinese “domestic demand is weak, and a longer-than-expected real estate downturn is a significant risk to our growth forecasts”, Zook notes. ” Capital spending is increasing faster in export-oriented sectors. External demand is robust, but a slowing global economy in 2025 will likely constrain export growth”.

    There is a case for the Communist Party of Xi’s devaluing the yuan. One of his 11 years in power was one of the most consistently consistent reform initiatives to create a stable and reliable currency regime.

    ” This was a commonly discussed topic throughout the year, and while it’s impossible to say for sure, we do not think this is a likely outcome”, says Lynn Song, economist at ING Bank. China’s emphasis on currency stabilization is not directly related to short-term trade flows, but it is likely to lessen pressure on capital outflows in the near future and make RMB trade settlement and internationalization easier.

    In consequence, Song states that” we anticipate the PBOC to continue to resist significant movements for the RMB in either direction.” This position does not appear to be significantly changing.

    The” PBOC might attempt to reset the yuan at a new equilibrium after incorporating the tariffs risk,” says Mizuho Bank’s chief Asian FX strategist, Ken Cheung. By front-loading onshore yuan depreciation, it could smooth out volatility during the US tariffs announcement, if any”.

    Economist Robin Xing&nbsp, at Morgan Stanley notes that” we believe PBOC’s strategy could be to tolerate some onshore yuan depreciation against the dollar, but keep it outperforming other emerging-market currencies with intervention”.

    All bets are off, of course, if Trump tries to out-devalue Asia. Trump’s supporters have suggested a unilateral dollar-price strategy to benefit US exporters. Trumpworld has been debating an Argentina-like pivot at the behest of advisors like Robert Lighthizer, Trump’s former and likely future international trade representative.

    Or if Trump’s next Treasury Department attempts to upend the post-World War II” Bretton Woods” system in ways Trump 1.0 did n’t. Trump’s tax proposals could also lead to an even higher national debt, which would lead to credit downgrades that would cause the dollar to drastically fall.

    For now, though, the” Trump trade” is sending the dollar higher and pulling waves of capital toward US assets. That is putting downward pressure on the yuan, which is raising concerns that Beijing might choose to pursue a downward trend.

    Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

    Continue Reading

    ‘I lost nine teeth filming Squid Game’: BBC on set with show’s director

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia
    Netflix The dystopian Korean drama became a global sensation when it was first released in 2021Netflix

    The inventor of the popular Asian episode Squid Game immediately refutes my claims that he lost six tooth while shooting the first season. ” It was eight or nine”, he laughs.

    Hwang Dong-hyuk is speaking to me on set as he movies the second set of his futuristic Netflix movie, which sees hundreds of debt-laden contestants fight it out for a hefty income reward, by playing a series of life-or-death children’s games.

    However, it was n’t always possible to get a new series. At one level, he swore against making one.

    I wonder what caused him to change because of the pressure it has caused.

    ” Money”, he answers, without hesitation.

    ” Even though the first series was such a huge global success, honestly I did n’t make much”, he tells me. But I’ll need to make up for the accomplishment of the first one, too, by starting the next series.

    ” And I did n’t fully finish the story”, he adds.

    The second line was Netflix’s most powerful show to day, thrusting South Korea and its home-grown television plays into the light. People around the world were moved by its dark remark on wealth inequality.

    However, Hwang has had to start from scratch with a new put and collection of game after killing off nearly every figure. This day, market expectations are sky high.

    ” The anxiety I feel now is little greater”, he says.

    Hwang is even more skeptical about the state of the world three times after the first line first aired.

    He points to the growing global wealth divide, climate change, and present war. Problems no longer exist only between the wealthy and the poor, he claims, but they exist actively between various generations, genders, and political parties.

    ” New lines are being drawn. We’re in an age of us vs them. Who’s straight and who’s incorrect”?

    Netflix The creators of the series say the second season will see more factionalism and fights among the contestantsNetflix

    As I toured the show’s lighthearted cast, with its peculiar brightly-coloured staircase, I picked up a few clues as to how the movie’s despair will get reflected this time around.

    In this set, the preceding success, Gi-hun, re-enters the game on a mission to bring it down and save the latest square of candidates.

    According to Lee Jung-jae, who plays the leading figure, he is “more eager and determined” than previously.

    The surface of the hostel, where the contestants sleep at night, has been divided in two.

    The logos for both sides have a large red fluorescent X symbol and a blue circle.

    Then, after every game, the players must get a side, depending on whether they want to stop the contest earlier and live, or stay playing, in the knowledge all but one of them may die. The majority choice laws.

    This, I am told, may lead to more divisiveness and conflicts.

    It is a piece of chairman Hwang’s effort to expose the consequences of a more tribalized world. Forcing individuals to choose sides, he believes, is fuelling issue.

    Some people found Squid Game wantonly harsh and difficult to watch despite the shocking storytelling of its fans.

    Talking with Hwang makes it abundantly clear that the violence has been thoroughly considered. He is driven by a growing sense of unease and has a deep concern for the earth.

    I kept asking myself,” Complete we people have what it takes to navigate the world off this downward way,” when creating this series. ‘. Honestly, I do n’t know”, he says.

    Fans of the second line can be comforted that some of the game’s plot holes will be filled in, such as why the sport exists and what motivates the veiled Front Man running it, despite not receiving the answers to these important life questions.

    ” People will see more of the Front Man’s history, his narrative and his thoughts”, reveals the artist Lee Byung-hun, who plays the strange position.

    ” I do n’t believe this will warm up viewers, but it might help them understand his choices,” he said.

    As one of South Korea’s most famous actors, Lee admits that having his face and eyes covered and his words distorted throughout the first line, was” a little bit dissatisfying”.

    He has enjoyed getting displays where he can fully express himself in his own voice in this line, which he almost did not expect.

    Getty Images Squid Game director Hwang Dong-hyuk says Netflix paid him a modest upfront amount for the showGetty Images

    Before Netflix swooped in, Hwang unsuccessfully tried for ten years to make Squid Game and to secure big money to support his family.

    He was unable to cash in on the staggering £650m it is thought to had made the program because they only paid him a small upfront sum.

    This explains the romantic relationship that North Korean film and television producers have with global streaming services.

    Over the past few years, Netflix has stormed the Asian industry with billions of dollars of expenditure, bringing the industry worldwide reputation and love, but leaving authors feeling short-changed.

    They claim that the program is obliging them to renounce their rights when they enter contracts, and that this is infringing on their right to profit.

    This is a global concern.

    In the past, authors could depend on a percentage of box office profits or TV reruns, but streaming giant have n’t yet adopted this strategy.

    According to creators, South Korea’s archaic copyright laws, which do not protect them, add to the problem.

    This summer, performers, artists, directors and suppliers teamed up to form a social, to fight the system up.

    ” In Korea, being a film producer is just a task name, it’s certainly a way to make a living”, the vice-president of the Korean Film Directors Guild, Oh Ki-hwan, tells the visitors at an occasion in Seoul.

    Some of his producer friends, he says, work part-time in stores and as car owners.

    Park Hae-young is a writer at the celebration. When Netflix bought her present,’ My Independence Notes’, it became a worldwide reach.

    ” I’ve been writing my entire life. So, to find international recognition when competing with makers from across the globe, has been a pleasant experience”, she tells me.

    Park claims that she is hesitant to “pour her entire” into her second series due to the current streaming model.

    ” Frequently, I’ll spend four or five years making a crisis in the belief that, if it’s successful, it was relatively secure my coming, that I’ll get my fair share of payment. Without that, what’s the point of working so hard”?

    She and other creators are urging the South Korean government to repeal its copyright laws, making it impossible for production companies to share their profits.

    The South Korean government told the BBC that the industry had the final say in resolving the issue, even though it acknowledged the need for a change. A spokesperson for Netflix told us it offers” competitive” compensation, and guarantees creators” solid compensation, regardless of the success or failure of their shows”.

    Hwang, the director of Squid Game, hopes that Hwang’s candor will lead to that change.

    He has undoubtedly sparked a fair pay debate, and the industry will undoubtedly benefit from watching his second season.

    He claims that his teeth are once more painful when we catch up after the filming has finished.

    ” I have n’t seen my dentist yet, but I’ll probably have to pull out a few more very soon”.

    On December 26, 2024, Netflix will release the second season of Squid Game.

    Continue Reading

    China consumer prices rise at slower rate in October

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    SHANGHAI: China’s consumer inflation rate slowed in October, official data showed Saturday ( Nov 9 ), in a sign that demand remains sluggish in the world’s number two economy. Regulators have been attempting to boost domestic exercise as a home problems strains confidence. The consumer price index ( CPI), aContinue Reading

    China’s .4 trillion debt swap girds for Trump tariffs to come – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    The US$ 1.4 trillion debt swap package announced by China today ( November 8 ) may have a more significant impact than what might seem.

    The shift to mortgage regional authorities bill, approved by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, marks the first such effort since 2015 to increase the debt roof for communities.

    It comes amid concerns about a new Donald Trump presidency that will restore world trade wars, inflationary pressures, and great youth unemployment.

    The swap agreement, according to Finance Minister Lan Fo’an, “is a big policy decision taking into account international and domestic advancement environments, the need to maintain the stability of the financial and fiscal operations, and the actual development situation of nearby governments.”

    Lan reckons the swap might save roughly 600 billion yuan ( US$ 84 billion ) in interest payments over five years, freeing additional resources to boost investment and consumption. As of the close of 2023, Lan estimates, China’s excellent hidden debt was 14.3 trillion yuan.

    Some economists think Friday’s action is enough to revive assurance, as evidenced by a fall in stocks and the renminbi. Most people do n’t believe that this will be the final attempt to alter the story.

    As Carlos&nbsp, Casanova, scholar at Union Bancaire Privée, sees it,” the local authorities debt swap program remains inadequate, but extra measures could inspire a recovery in personal investment and a broadening of local consumption”.

    Some economists believe that there might still be room for more immediate action to increase home need. What the transfer system may do, though, is get Xi’s Communist Party some time to implement critically needed changes.

    Everyone is aware that Team Xi needs to concentrate on strengthening money markets and repairing the property market. Beijing has act more quickly to lessen its hold on power over state-owned enterprises and create more room for startups to stifle the economy. Additionally, authorities had create stronger social safety nets to encourage families to invest more and keep less.

    However, despite the desire for these improvements, international investors rarely grant Beijing the patience to carry them out. And efforts to fix, change or adapt China’s economic engines are sure to lower rise significantly. Markets, though, wo n’t hear of it.

    Any hint of disappointing island progress causes Chinese stocks to be sold off by international investors. It encourages economists all over to describe the decline in global progress, trade flows, and commodity prices in frequently depressing, market-deflating conditions.

    It results in Xi becoming the financial relative of a CEO struggling to produce quarterly earnings. This pattern fosters short-termism, which is one that contributes to Beijing’s gradual progress with China Inc.

    Granted, Xi’s group does itself no privileges by continuing to reveal annual development goals. Setting subjective GDP goals year after year distorts incentives and causes policymakers to promote trigger over supply-side retooling.

    With this most recent trigger explosion, Xi’s reform team may gain some reluctance from global markets. It’s ambitious enough to convince skeptical people that China is committed to permanently putting an end to recession.

    Restoring trust “relies on fiscal and monetary policy help lifting minimum demand”, says Alex Muscatelli, scientist at Fitch Ratings. ” If present trends in the home market are exacerbated, price falls may be entrenched”.

    Muscatelli adds that there is a chance of sustained value declines as a result of the “potential exacerbation of recent supply and demand styles coupled with demographic and debts overhang challenges.”

    Avoiding that “exacerbation” means pairing monetary and fiscal stimulus with strong revamping moves to increase China’s dynamic activity.

    Premier Li Qiang stated in a statement at the China International Import Expo that Beijing has “ample room for fiscal plan and financial policy,” adding that the country will meet the country’s 5 % goal this year. ” The Taiwanese government has the ability to push sustained financial improvement”, Li said.

    However Trump’s re-election ups the ante on Beijing. Travel January 2025, when he’s sworn in, Trump will be on the time to hit 60 % levies on Asia’s biggest economy, as he vowed he would on the plan path.

    ” To mitigate rising US taxes on the market, we believe Beijing had probably scale up governmental stimulus”, says Robin Xing, a planner at Morgan Stanley. Xi may feel compelled to do something about them the more Trump raises trade tensions, according to Xing.

    With a Trump success, ING Bank’s main China analyst Lynn Song adds that” the chances for a larger policy assistance package will increase fairly.”

    Although China is more prepared to stifle global trade, Eurasia Group’s China practice’s managing director Rick Waters claims Beijing may struggle to stop the collateral damage.

    According to Waters,” I believe the challenge is that China is still at a structural disadvantage in a trade war because they lack symmetry.” When the US imposes tariffs on them, they are unable to do so.

    Song counters that” the first trade war was a game changer, many companies were caught off guard, and investors were left scrambling. Trump’s proposed tariffs have been in discussion for some time, so they should n’t surprise you much this time around.

    Yet the magnitude of the trade tariffs to come could be unprecedented. Take the 100 % tariffs Trump has threatened on Mexican-made cars. How long do Toyota and Hyundai CEOs anticipate that Trump will extend their agreements to South Korea and Japan?

    Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, says,” the world’s second-largest economy is already underperforming, and Beijing is feeling increasingly defensive about the tariff threats coming from hawks like former Trump trade czar Robert Lighthizer”.

    The Chinese, Bremmer adds, “are going to be frantically trying to establish back channels to China-friendly Trump allies like Elon Musk, hoping they can facilitate a less confrontational relationship. Trump’s hawks will gain favors and demand an even more confrontational strategy, or both? Beijing will move cautiously and slowly in this environment”.

    Alicia García-Herrero, chief Asia-Pacific economist at Natixis, notes that an “insufficient stimulus package, coming on the heels of Trump’s re-election” would backfire, meaning China “needs to find other sources of growth because trade will not make it”.

    Another concern is how these and other Trump levies might conflict with Wells Fargo &amp, Co.’s strategy to lower interest rates, writes Brendan McKenna.

    More tariffs could fan inflation, he says, adding that the Fed easing “less aggressively” than currently forecast could “act as a tailwind for the dollar”.

    China is hardly recession-bound. Data on exports in October, for example, signaled a healthy acceleration — the biggest upshift in activity since mid-2022. In response to Trump’s tariffs, some analysts wonder if Beijing might devalue the yuan in retaliation.

    ” Beijing might look to devalue the yuan as they did in 2018-2019 to counter tariff effects and boost export competitiveness”, says Dilin Wu, a research strategist at brokerage Pepperstone.

    It’s a difficult balancing act. China, after all, is facing multiple challenges from several angles. And if the yuan falls, the biggest of all might get worse. If the yuan drops significantly, property developers who have sizable offshore debt may find it more difficult to make payments.

    China’s obsession with annual growth goals plays a major role in the weaker yuan argument. It’s become a particular distraction since the 2008-2009 Lehman Brothers crisis era.

    Since then, China’s growth model has relied heavily on municipal leaders around the nation ordering up huge projects: six-lane highways, monorails, international airports, stadiums, conference and shopping centers, city hall complexes, corporate campus districts, five-star hotels, massive museums.

    For local government leaders, making China’s annual numbers has dominated the economic incentive structure. A motivated local powerbroker can consistently turn in above-average GDP rates, which is the quickest way to capture Beijing’s attention.

    When Xi rose to power in 2012, he pledged to let market forces play a “decisive” role in economic policymaking. Beijing has worked for the past five years to lessen risk in the financial system and reduce risks for property developers to demonstrate this. However, the GDP goal contradicts that priority.

    The problem, argues Thomas Helbling, deputy director of the International Monetary Fund’s Asia-Pacific unit, is that” the economy is very investment heavy”.

    The biggest headwinds China’s way is being slowed by the property crisis and falling global demand, according to the IMF. Yet, so is a growth model that encourages unproductive borrowing.

    Beijing, Helbling says, must level the playing field for private businesses to compete with state-owned enterprises. To encourage consumption and boost investment in education and technology, it must create a strong social safety net. Pension reforms are also crucial to dealing with China’s aging population.

    ” If you do those reforms, there is an upside to growth”, Helbling concludes.

    Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

    Continue Reading

    China is trying to fix its economy. Trump could derail those plans

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia
    Reuters US President Donald Trump meeting with China's President Xi Jinping during the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan, 29 June, 2019.Reuters

    As it prepares for a minute Donald Trump administration, China is expected to announce new measures to improve its sagging market.

    Trump won the election on a program that promised rough transfer fees, including levies as high as 60 % on Chinese-made products.

    His success is then possible to stymie Xi Jinping’s plans to turn the nation into a tech powerhouse and more stress relations between the world’s two largest economies.

    A home fall, rising government loan and poverty, and low consumption have slowed down Chinese expansion since the pandemic.

    The most recent announcement from China’s legislature’s Standing Committee, the National People’s Congress ( NPC ), is now in high demand.

    Trump imposed tariffs of up to 25 % on Chinese goods during his first term in office.

    According to China analyst Bill Bishop, Trump may be told what he will with his new tax strategies.

    ” I think we should believe that he means it when ]he ] talks about tariffs, that he sees China as having reneged on his trade deal, that he thinks China and Covid cost him the 2020 election”.

    After Trump left the White House in 2021, the force from Washington did not comfortable. The Biden presidency maintained and, in some cases, expanded the steps.

    China is now much more resilient than it was before the Trump tariffs were imposed.

    Since immediately abdicating its stringent Covid restrictions two years ago, the business has been having trouble returning to pre-pandemic levels of growth.

    China has become a frequent source of depressing economic information rather than delivering the broadly anticipated, fast-paced recovery.

    Even before Trump’s election victory and after China began rolling out measures to support its economy in September, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lowered its annual growth target for the country.

    The IMF now expects the Chinese economy to expand by 4.8 % in 2024, at the lower end of Beijing’s” about 5 %” target. Next time, it projects China’s annual growth rate will drop further to 4.5 %.

    But the government’s officials were not caught completely off watch by the end to decades of super-fast progress.

    President Xi stated in 2017 that his nation intended to move from “rapid rise to a period of high-quality development.”

    Chinese officials have since used the phrase to describe a change to an market driven by superior manufacturing and natural industries.

    Some economists contend that China may just import out of trouble.

    China challenges falling into the type of decades-long slowdown that Japan endured after a property and house bubble burst in the 1990s, Morgan Stanley Asia’s past chair, Stephen Roach, says.

    To avoid that fate, he says China may bring “on undeveloped customer demand” and walk away from “export and investment-led development”.

    That would not only encourage more sustainable growth but also lower” trade tensions and]China’s ] vulnerability to external shocks”, he says.

    poses.

    New business, aged issues

    But China, which has long been the country’s shop for low-cost products, is trying to replicate that achievements with high-tech imports.

    It is already a world leader in solar panels, electric vehicles ( EVs ) and lithium ion batteries.

    China currently accounts for at least 80 % of solar panel production, according to the International Energy Agency ( IEA ). Additionally, it is the largest producer of EV chargers and capacitors.

    China continued to show “remarkable improvement in adding clean capacity,” according to the IEA, accounting for a fourth of the world’s total next year.

    ” For convinced there is an entire effort to support high-tech production in China”, says David Lubin, a senior research fellow at London based-think pond, Chatham House.

    ” This has been very successful”, he adds.

    Exports of electric vehicles, lithium ion batteries and solar panels jumped 30 % in 2023, surpassing one trillion yuan ($ 139bn, £108bn ) for the first time as China continued to strengthen its global dominance in each of those industries.

    That export growth has helped to lessen China’s economy’s impact from the continuous estate crisis.

    ” China’s overcapacity will increase, there is not question about it. They have no other source of growth”, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, general analyst for the Asia Pacific region at investment banks Natixis.

    However, in addition to those increased imports, there has also been more opposition from Western nations, including not just the US.

    Only last month, the European Union increased tariffs on Chinese-built Vehicles to as much as 45 %.

    The issue is that large consumers of those items, including Europe and the US, are extremely reluctant to accept them, according to Katrina Ell, analysis director at Moody’s Analytics.

    Beijing will have to consider whether its most recent measures to improve its slowing market may be sufficient as Trump prepares to return to the Oval Office with a pledge to nail Chinese imports.

    Continue Reading

    ‘Trump trade’ wins, Asia loses as risk factors surge – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia, World

    It’s obvious Donald Trump’s big gain is a game-changer of epic sizes, from the harsh effect in Asian economies to the frantic press speculation about what lies ahead.

    The declines in Chinese securities and the yuan only demonstrate how investors are quickly rearranging their strategies for addressing global financial risks and opportunities. The money surged on the news Trump scored a&nbsp, next term. US companies jumped, as did crypto prices. Provides on US Treasury securities shot higher, also.

    The” Trump trade” that Asia has in mind is to take cover. A Trump 2.0 White House may certainly be more inward-looking, putting Asia’s export-oriented economy in harm’s way.

    A large fire radius is present. Though aimed at China, Trump’s designed 60 % tariffs will destroy Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam and another trade-driven markets. The aftermath on shipping flows could be unimaginable.

    According to Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, a planner at JPMorgan,” a significant increase in tariffs would reflect the most significant departure in policy from the latest administration and possibly the largest source of volatility.” The current macro environment is significantly different from what it was eight years ago, when the business cycle was in its mid-cycle, when the Fed did n’t care about inflation, and when pro-growth 1.0 policies were simpler to implement and had a greater impact on the bottom line.

    Trump’s win over Kamala Harris is more of a “black swans” occasion for Asia than a “gray one.” Unlike the past, the latter is a repetitive but doubtful results. A “gray swan”, though, does have its own&nbsp, serious consequences, too.

    Unexpected effects might be a way to strengthen Xi Jinping’s influence in China. Trump may effectively strengthen it by attacking Beijing with such an aggressiveness that he essentially strengthens by compulsion to integrate with an Eastern economy with China at its core and not an America led by an uneven, mercantilist president who blames Asia for many of his country’s failings.

    For Asia, the best-case situation is that Trump’s tax risks are more a negotiating strategy than a real accompli. In fact, Goldman Sachs economists predict that Trump may only establish 20 % tariffs on China and resist the urge to impose blanket charges on other countries.

    Trump may turn the other means and impose taxes he has previously threatened to impose. Trump has already stated that there will be 100 % taxes on Mexican car exports.

    How much is manufacturers in Japan and Korea hope to avoid such restrictions, especially given that Tesla’s CEO has Trump’s ear? At the very least, electronic vehicle charges will be stacked confidently against non-US manufacturers.

    The&nbsp, financial challenges &nbsp, may be even greater. One is that a penny march that has already irritated Asia will take a turn. For years, the economy’s “wasteball” impulses have shook international markets. It has lured enormous waves of global capital west, disadvantaging emerging-market markets in specific.

    The difficulty, explains Tom Dunleavy, a companion at MV Capital, is that emerging markets “rely strongly on assets and have debts in money”. The majority of business and debt is also based in dollars, along with fuel. And he says that” the ratio of everything is going up.”

    Regardless of the dubious reasoning behind it, the more packed a continued-dollar-strength business becomes as the result of the global fallout when depressed punters flee for their exits. And Trump was serve up some such situations.

    Though Trump’s tariffs get the headlines, Asia is extremely worried about what his next president may mean for the Federal Reserve, the keeper of the world’s top supply money.

    Trump put the techniques on the Fed during his 2017-2021 stay in the White House. Jerome Powell sabotaged his hand-picked Fed chair, and he went after him frequently. In 2019, Powell bowed to unrelenting force from&nbsp, Trump, who also threatened to fire him.

    That’s how the world’s most powerful economic authority added liquidity to a flourishing business that did n’t need new substances. Trump’s Fed meddling set the stage for the post-Covid-19 price surge to come. It also tarnished the Fed’s credibility in global markets.

    For Asia, Trump’s Fed policies are especially worrisome. The region’s central banks are armed with the largest stocks of US Treasury securities. Japan alone holds$ 1.1 trillion of US debt, China$ 770 billion.

    Together, Asia’s largest holders of dollars own about$ 3 trillion worth. Trump 2.0 would put at risk vast amounts of Asian state wealth if his fiscal policies push Washington’s debt far above today’s US$ 35 trillion.

    Not to mention the ways China might retaliate, leading to cycle of tit-for-tat trade curbs. Or might Beijing make a move to dump sizable amounts of Treasuries to punish the Trump 2.0 gang?

    Or what if Trump’s designs on altering the Fed’s mandate come to pass? A key plank of the” Project 2025″ strategy that the Heritage Foundation devised for a&nbsp, second Trump term&nbsp, is watering down Fed independence.

    In a recent interview with Bloomberg, Trump took shots at Powell and his fellow policymakers. ” I think it’s the greatest job in government”, Trump said. Everybody talks about you like a god when you say,” Let’s say flip a coin,” and you show up to the office once a month.

    Trump also contends that the White House has every right to compel the Fed to do its bidding.

    Trump once remarked in August that the Federal Reserve had “kind of got it wrong” ( very interesting ). He went on to say that” I feel the president should have at least ]some ] say in there, yeah. I feel that strongly. I think that, in my case, I made a lot of money. I was very successful. And I believe I have a better instinct than those who, in many cases, would be chairman of the Federal Reserve.

    This could put the Fed’s economic role closer to that of the People’s Bank of China.

    To be sure, the concept of central bank independence has been muddied. Take the&nbsp, Bank of Japan, which has held interest rates at or near zero for 25 years. What truly self-governing central bank would do that?

    Yet the Fed is a different story. The dollar serves as the foundation of global finance and trade. Trump frequently discussed using a weaker dollar to gain a competitive advantage during his first term. Any policy change that undermines confidence in the US government and the dollar makes the world system shakier.

    A weaker dollar could fan inflation. That, on top of Trump’s tariffs, could put the Fed in a very tough spot as Trump looks over Powell’s shoulder. Economists are frantically debating how all of this might turn out.

    ” On the US dollar, Trump wants to revitalize US manufacturing and exports”, says Will Denyer, an analyst at Gavekal Research. He may try to manipulate the dollar lower because he recognizes that the strength of the US dollar is an obstacle to these goals.

    However, Denyer says, “he has few good options. Given how dependent the US government and companies are on foreign capital today, it is difficult to use capital controls to deter foreign inflows. And if Fed chair Jay Powell persists until the end of his term in May 2026, leaning on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates wo n’t be simple in the near future.

    Trump might try to use the threat of tariffs as a negotiating tactic in an effort to revalue their currencies, Denyer adds. However, it is doubtful whether multilateral or even broader economic policy changes will significantly weaken the US dollar in the absence of broader economic policy shifts.

    This, Denyer concludes,” will leave Trump to hope that continued disinflation allows the Fed to cut rates, weakening the US dollar. However, there is a sizable probability that loose fiscal policy and sticky inflation will keep&nbsp, monetary policy&nbsp, relatively tight, supporting the US dollar and confounding Trump’s aim of weakening the currency”.

    Another irrational possibility: whether Trump will continue to flirt with defaulting on US debt. He declared to CNBC in 2016 that he would “know that you could make a deal” if the economy crashed. And if the economy was good, it was good. So, therefore, you ca n’t lose”.

    Trump considered canceling Beijing’s debt while serving as president for the first time in light of trade tensions. With the US national debt twice the size of Chinese gross domestic product, it’s easy to see how that would make the 2008″ Lehman shock” seem quaint by comparison.

    Asian assets are also weighed by the threat of geopolitical conflict. One example is what a Trump 2.0 foreign policy team might have for Taiwan.

    Trump’s return is music to Vladimir Putin’s ears, giving the Russian leader greater scope to commandeer&nbsp, Ukraine&nbsp, once and for all. Compared with US President Joe Biden’s administration, Trump also seems less likely to come to Taipei’s defense if China moved against the island of&nbsp, 23 million people.

    Asia investors will also keep their bets guessing about the direction US policies in the Middle East will take. Trump, for instance, might give Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu more freedom to fight the conflict in Gaza. He’s also likely to tighten sanctions on Iran, adding fresh uncertainty to oil supply dynamics and, by extension, energy prices.

    ” Conceptually, the impact of a potential second Trump term on oil prices is ambiguous”, says commodity researcher Yulia Zhestkova Grigsby at Goldman Sachs.

    As Trump 2.0 assumes power, other issues will concern Asian governments. Japan and Korea are concerned that Trump’s “grand bargain” trade agreement with Xi leaves other top Asian nations staring in from the distance.

    All that’s clear, though, is that there will be fewer guardrails or inhibitions as Trump seeks to “make America great again” at Asia’s expense.

    Continue Reading