De-dollarization the path to global financial freedom – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Restrictions on the economy and finances frequently have negative effects. The dollar’s use of force against Russia is the most significant example. The estimate has sparked a global action to de-dollarize, the reverse of the disciplinary move’s proper intent.

Despite the legendary error, US Senator Marco Rubio of Florida was able to introduce a bill into Congress to chastise de-dollarized nations. The bill aims to outlaw economic organizations that devalue the world’s currency.

The Sanctions Evasion Prevention and Mitigation Act, a ominous acronym for Rubio’s costs, may involve US president to impose sanctions on financial institutions that use Russia’s SPFS financial messaging services, China’s CIPS payment system, and other solutions to the dollar-centric SWIFT program.

Rubio is not alone in targeting places selling to de-dollarize. Donald Trump’s financial advisors are weighing ways to chastise nations that are constantly devaluing the money.

The Trump administration has proposed to” sanction both supporters and opponents who seek effective means of bilateral trade in assets other than the dollar.” Violators may be subjected to import restrictions, tariffs and” dollar manipulation charges”.

Awakening BRICS

Initial de-dollarization was criticized by US policymakers and economic media critics. They argued the money is used in some 80 % of all international financial dealings. No other money perhaps approaches.

But economic sanctions against Russia, imposed after Russia’s military action in Ukraine’s Donbas region in 2022, became a turning point. De-dollarization has accelerated, and it is now probably unsustainable.

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN ) made the announcement in May of its intention to stop transnational trade and instead use local currencies. Although the statement made little stories in the world, ASEAN is a significant trading bloc made up of ten nations and 600 million people in total.

Bartering contracts are another way to get around the dollar program. While Pakistan has authorized bartering with Iran, Afghanistan, and Russia, Iran and Thailand are trading foods for fuel. China is building a state-of-the-art aircraft in Iran, to get paid for in oil.

Additionally, using cryptocurrencies to defy the dollar system and prevent being scrutinized by American courts. Beyond the traditional banking system, cryptography, such as Bitcoin, enables users to send and receive money anywhere in the world in a secure manner.

The BRICS, which are quickly emerging as the largest economic bloc in the world, have large priorities regarding de-dollarization.

Aside from a shared desire to build a counterpoint to the G7, the BRICS had some clearly defined goals as of 2022. However, the group’s strong new focus and purpose were facilitated by the dollar system’s weaponization and the melting of US$ 300 billion in Soviet reserves held in Western banks.

BRICS started as an improbable partnership. The five foundation families have different cultures, political systems, and financial systems, with locations on three different continents. However, they are both eager to create a unipolar earth.

The majority of the world’s nations trade with China mostly through China. Their mutual trading may undoubtedly eventually go against the dollar.

The BRICS has no intellectual program and is driven by economics. It concentrates mainly on cooperation and socioeconomic development. Its philosophy is based on consensus and cooperation.

China is the BRICS’s financial statement because it is the largest trading partner of the majority of nations. As China steadily de-dollarizes, its investing partners are likely to adopt in different degrees.

The consists

The US government’s influence over the world monetary system dates back to 1974, when it persuaded Saudi Arabia to simply buy its oil in bucks. The deal came after the US declared its intention to leave the gold standard in 1971. The’gold window’, in which money could be exchanged for real gold, was closed by President Richard Nixon.

The US was fighting two wars at the same time – the war in Vietnam and the war on poverty – and the government issued more dollars and debt than could be backed by gold. The consists assured continued global demand global for dollars.

All oil-importing nations were required to keep money reserves, according to the deal. Oil-exporting nations invested their money surpluses in US Treasury and Bonds, providing ongoing funding for the country’s debts.

The money technique was used to support the world economy by selling oil in dollars. Oil accounts for only 10 % of global trade, but it is a significant contributor to the remaining 90 %.

US bill issues

The US has a significant advantage over other nations because it has power over the country’s reserve currency. It has the authority to acquiesce to any nation it sees as an economic or political interlocutor, and it has the ability to sanitize it.

Also, the government can issue loans to overseas countries in its own money. Countries that require imports of essential commodities like fuel, meal, and medicine but lack the funds can use the International Monetary Fund to obtain loans.

The beginning of the business, privatizing people companies, and liberalizing financial markets are typical neo-liberal conditions that countries are subject to when lending to them. The outcomes were not ideal.

IMF customers include Pakistan, Argentina, and Egypt, which demonstrate how frequently nations struggle to pay off debts. In April this year, Pakistan received its latest aid package of$ 3 billion, its 23rd IMF loan since 1958.

The consists made it easier for the US to finance its debt and led to profligate spending by the US government. In 1985, just ten years after the petrodollar agreement, the US became the biggest debtor in the world.

In 1974, the US national debt was$ 485 billion, or 31 % of GDP. This year, the national debt surpassed$ 35 trillion, representing 120 % of GDP.

This year, the federal debt’s interest payments will surpass$ 8 billion, making it the most important budget item forward of defense and social security. In a few years, discretionary spending will surpass all other types of investing without a significant course adjustment.

The debt crises reinforces rising US concerns about de-dollarization. Less money buyers of US bill mean less money is spent on them.

US securities have long been viewed as a safe haven for buyers. Bonds provide a predictable transfer, and the government guarantees payment. But in the past few years, buyer desire for long-term US loan has come under stress. A obvious sign of trouble: the money and golden, which for years had traded in a small speed, started to vary.

Prior to the Biden administration’s huge stimulus spending in 2020, the dollar and gold exchanged in tandem. The money lost value in comparison to gold, which was previously the world’s anchor of wealth, but gold did not.

The problem of buyers is based on simple arithmetic. If the US problems more dollars/debt than socioeconomic development justifies, it causes inflation. When bond yields are 4 % and inflation is 8 %, bonds are a loss-making investment, which is not good for pension funds and other investors with long-term commitments.

The US bond market is valued at$ 50 trillion, a substantial amount by most measures. The minimum value of the world’s dollar system, which is essentially unimaginable but has more than a quarter of a billion dollars, is a pale figure. &nbsp, &nbsp,

  • The off-shore shadow banks is estimated at$ 65 trillion
  • The generic business is valued at$ 800 trillion
  • The off-shore dark banking sector is$ 65 trillion
  • The eurodollar market is$ 5 trillion to$ 13 trillion

De-dollarization results in the gradual return of some trillions of dollars to their original owners. The need for money will only decrease as a result of countries ‘ transition to multicurrency trading.

The US’s ability to attract more foreigners may be diminished as a result of US dollar flow. Fewer buyers means higher interest payment, which leads to higher debts.

Gold versus Bitcoin

To minimize US debt, which is thought to be about 70 % of GDP, several measures have been suggested by academics and politicians. Socially, however, the necessary drastic spending cuts and higher fees are in order.

A second option for addressing the debt-death circular has been suggested by a number of officials and economists: strengthening the US stability sheet by adding Bitcoin to the country’s resources.

More than 200, 000 Bitcoins have already been seized and declared a debt by the US government. Donald Trump, the US government’s nominee for president, has pledged to keep Bitcoins on the balance sheet.

Bitcoin is also inexpensive, claim Bitcoin’s proponents. They predict its price may reach six images, up from$ 60, 000 in recent months. Cyber bull contrast a sizable order of Bitcoin with the Louisiana Purchase in the 19th century, when the US purchased almost a third of France’s territory for$ 15 million.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the president’s nominee, has gone one step further and suggested that the US government purchase Bitcoin in exchange for the country’s recent golden resources. &nbsp,

Cryptocurrency is in line with gold’s dollar amount.

A portion of the US government’s$ 615 billion in silver is now held by the government, which is a fraction of its$ 35 trillion loan. The government would need to purchase more than 9 million Bitcoins at present prices to suit the value of its golden reserves.

Importantly, Kennedy Jr wants the authorities to up the money with a combination of resources like gold, gold and platinum, in addition to Bitcoin. A “basket” of these assets may be a new group of US ties.

Ironic, let Bitcoin save the money. The crypto was designed to avoid, if not destroy, the dollar and the stablecoins money system.

Similarly humorous, Bitcoin is generally denominated and valued in cash. That is, whatever happens to the money will affect the dollar-denominated Bitcoin. Silver, on the other hand, is in a course of its own.

If the money or Bitcoins goes to zero, the owner is left with nothing. If silver goes to zero, the owner still has the metal.

The next supply money

Kennedy Jr. is probably correct to assume that all painful assets will be used to support the money. The Argentine peso and Zimbabwe’s dollar could change their currencies if that is the case. Both nations almost eliminated their currency depreciation. In order to enforce governmental control on the government, Zimbabwe suddenly turned to gold-backed money.

The Bretton Woods Agreement, which set the gold-backed money as the standard for all other currencies, has been the first de-dollarization challenge to the penny since 1944. Given the political pressure between BRICS and G7 countries, a Bretton Woods II is very unlikely.

Otherwise, there will be more multicurrency agreements being created, and perhaps a BRICS exchanging currency will be introduced. The BRICS money unit will only be online, with asset-backed backing. No paper money or coins may be distributed.

The global financial system is therefore likely to fragment into three sections: the dollar-led stablecoins system, multicurrency contracts and a BRICS-led investing money. The money will be the world’s next reserve money in addition to the other two, but the dollar is most likely to be the last one.

Reserve currencies are a ( neo)colonial remnant. They mainly benefit rich people and corporations. Countries will generally benefit from a multicurrency system because it will reclaim their financial and financial autonomy and make them accountable for their own future.

Continue Reading

China looking like a ‘buy’ as US, Japan markets sag – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

As global investors dump US and Japanese stocks, China’s beaten-down markets are suddenly looking more attractive.

The debate over whether China is “uninvestable” has plagued Xi Jinping’s government since late 2020. That was back when Xi’s Communist Party cracked down on tech platforms, starting with Jack Ma’s Alibaba Group.

It hardly helped that Xi’s draconian Covid-19 lockdowns drove China’s growth into the red. Or that Xi’s party was slow to add fresh stimulus to Asia’s biggest economy when it arguably needed it most.

Now, China has a unique opportunity to shine as a bastion of stability as the US and Japanese economies face fast-mounting challenges.

US employment growth is slowing, spooking global punters who had grown used to the economy adding 200,000-plus new jobs per month. The US Federal Reserve, meanwhile, has been slow to cut interest rates as inflation has remained stubbornly close to 3%.

Adding to the drama is extreme political polarization at a moment when Americans prepare to pick a new president on November 5. This, against the backdrop of the US national debt topping US$35 trillion.

In Tokyo, markets are in abject trauma following the Bank of Japan’s July 31 rate hike. On Monday, the Nikkei Stock Average fell the most since “Black Monday” in 1987. Though stock prices later stabilized, fears of additional BOJ rate hikes have global investors on edge.

A big worry is the “yen-carry trade” blowing up. Since 1999, when the BOJ first cut rates to zero, investors everywhere have been borrowing cheaply in yen and using those funds to bet on higher-yielding assets around the globe.

This explains why sudden moves in the yen can savage asset markets in New York, London, Dubai, Seoul and Shanghai. And raise questions about hedge funds everywhere blowing up.

All of this presents China with a chance to appear above the fray. To be sure, there’s an argument that China could indeed offer the calm that global investors seek. Particularly as events from Washington to Tokyo ring alarm bells.

Yet this requires Xi’s team to step up efforts to revive the narrative that China is moving upmarket as an investment destination.

A decade ago, Xi pledged to let market forces play a “decisive” role in decisions about economic and financial policy. A few years later, in 2015, a sudden plunge in stock prices slowed the reform process.

At the time, China Inc circled the wagons. Beijing directed waves of state funding into markets, suspending trading in thousands of companies, scrapped all initial public offerings and enabled mainlanders to pledge homes as collateral on margin loans. It even rushed out buzzy marketing campaigns to encourage stock-buying as a form of patriotism.

This treating-symptoms-over-reforms pattern has played out time and time again during Xi’s tenure. All of which explains why marshaling the state-sector-industrial complex to save the day, again, could backfire.

That episode, and others since then, exemplify why gains in Chinese shares too often haven’t been matched by moves to champion the private sector, increase transparency or strengthen corporate governance.

In recent years, investor disappointment sent capital fleeing China. Between late 2021 and early 2024, a $7 trillion rout in mainland shares shook global markets. Though Chinese stocks have stabilized somewhat since, the Shanghai-Shenzhen CSI 300 Index is still down 13.5% this year.

The question now, with price-to-earnings multiples trading at 13 versus 22 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average and 23 for Japan’s Nikkei Stock Average, is whether China is a “buy.”

“Chinese assets are expected to become a better choice for global funds in this round of global market turmoil triggered by the expectation of a US recession,” says Zhang Qiyao, analyst at Industrial Securities, arguing that the market boasts low valuations and improving fundamentals.

Analysts at Shanghai Securities said in a note that they “think a deep correction in the Japanese market has limited impact on China’s A-shares. Funds are expected to flow back into A-share. We believe that increased uncertainty in the overseas market and increased expectations of a recent interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve may prompt funds to seek safe havens.”

There are many risks to consider. One is the so-called “yen-carry trade” blowing up. The rebound in the Nikkei this week, a day after the market collapsed, was a relief for investors everywhere.

But the fact investors are buzzing about “contagion” effects is not a great sign as these things go. Nor is the yen’s continued upward trajectory after a powerful rally that’s already unnerving global markets.

It’s also worth noting that officials in Tokyo are preparing for the worst. Early next week, BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda will be questioned by a parliamentary committee. Lawmakers are clearly spooked by the market freakout over a rather gentle July 31 rate hike.

Part of this paranoia reflects memories of what happened back in 2006 and 2007, the last time the BOJ tried to move rates away from zero. Back then, the central bank managed to get rates up to 0.5%.

The recession that followed still haunts Tokyo. By 2008, the BOJ was slashing rates back to zero and restoring quantitative easing. What lawmakers want answered are questions about whether Japan will suffer a rerun of that episode.

Ueda can’t say, of course. No one can. No Group of Seven nation has ever held rates at zero or near zero for 25 years. Or conducted a 23-year QE experiment, one that’s now backfiring on Asia’s second-biggest economy.

The uncertainty factor here is rather epic. It stems from the yen’s role as a key funding currency. Over the last quarter century, the most crowded trade anywhere has been borrowing cheaply in yen and redeploying those funds in higher-yielding assets around the globe.

This yen-carry trade explains why big yen rallies tend to pull the floor out from under asset markets from New York to Seoul. The yen’s 13% surge since a July low shoulder-checked global markets.

There’s concern now about similar dynamics in the Chinese currency. “The next carry trade unwind could be the yuan,” says Khoon Goh, the head of Asia research at ANZ.

On Monday, the yuan rallied against the dollar along with the yen. This move could bolster the China-as-safe-haven argument as markets from New York to Tokyo gyrate.

Yet to build trust among global investors, Beijing needs to step up efforts to improve Chinese capital markets. That’s the key to increasing the appeal of the yuan as the key currency in trade and finance.

“If they really wanted to de-dollarize China’s trade, preferably shifting at least some of it into renminbi over time, China’s leaders would need to ensure two things,” says Louis Gave, analyst at Gavekal Research.

“The renminbi should remain a stable, not excessively volatile, currency. Given the size of China’s export industry, currency stability was always a policy priority, but the drive to internationalize the renminbi made it even more important.”

Gave notes that it’s also important for Chinese government bonds (CGBs) to begin outpacing returns on US Treasuries. “If China was going to convince the central banks of Thailand, Indonesia, South Africa or South Korea to move some of their reserves from US Treasuries into CGBs, then the reserve managers at these central banks would have to be rewarded for their courageous decisions to shift away from the US dollar,” Gave said.

Sure enough, he adds, “in the years that followed, returns on CGBs crushed the returns from government bonds in the US, Germany and Japan — the world’s other major bond markets. China’s outperformance is almost as striking as the capital destruction endured by Japanese and German bondholders. Over the last 10 years, China has been the only major bond market where US-dollar-based investors were able to outperform US inflation.”

Over the last five years, Gave notes, “none of the big government bond markets have kept abreast of US inflation, but again CGBs have outperformed the others. And over the last three years, CGBs are the only bonds that have delivered positive nominal returns, although not enough to keep up with US inflation.”

Yet reforms have been uneven. News late last month that Beijing is increasing opacity surrounding the flow of capital – limiting daily data on the amount of capital international funds deploy into and out of China – is a step in the wrong direction.

Those signals came the same week as the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) pledged to improve market operations, strengthen comprehensive research capabilities, deepen response mechanisms to manage market risks and hone regulations for trading.

Still, the extreme volatility from New York to Tokyo could restore China’s appeal as a reliable investment destination. Xi’s team just needs to shift the reform process into higher gear.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Looking for the upside of tariffs on China – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

I’ve been talking about&nbsp, vibes&nbsp, a lot over the past year, but this talk about something a little more substantial. Essentially, Trump and his movements have two key policy tenets: 1.) immigration limitations, and 2.) more taxes. This think about the next of these.

Taxes are no longer merely a Trump thought; they are a significant component of the Democratic policy kit. Biden’s tariffs on Chinese goods, announced up in May, went well beyond everything Trump did in his first word.

Some Democrats want to protect United manufacturing capacity in the face of a potential war with China, but I doubt a Harris presidency would do the opposite. But, regardless of who wins in November, tariffs will likely continue to be a significant policy instrument for the US.

I wrote a post about why tariffs frequently do n’t reduce trade deficits as effectively as their backers hoped back in February.

Generally, there are three factors tariffs tend to be disappointing. Most importantly, when you put up taxes against another country’s products, it causes that country’s currency to decrease against your money.

That raises the price of your export while lowering the cost of your goods. The taxes ‘ expected effect is partially offset by this. In fact, the Chinese currency drastically decreased a year and a half after Trump imposed tariffs on China during his first term:

Cause for authentic table: Xe .com

The numerous ways that Chinese businesses can circumvent tariffs are another aspect that reduce their success. They may “re-export” — generally, send someone to a third region, slap a” Made in Vietnam” or a” Made in Thailand” logo on it, and then offer it to America, free of taxes.

They can establish factories in third countries to ensure that those nations ‘ items are actually produced there. The US is unaware that it is importing a lot of Chinese goods because they can buy parts and components to builders in third countries.

They may take advantage of flaws like&nbsp, the “de minimis” rule&nbsp, that allows China to buy smaller items to America free of taxes. And so on. These techniques may all theoretically be corrected with sufficient information and surveillance. They hardly ever are in reality.

The second problem with taxes is that they make transitional products – components, parts, and components – more costly for US manufacturers. Taxes on steel and aluminum raise rates for American carmakers, aircraft companies, device manufacturers, and so on.

Building EVs in America costs more because of battery levies. Solar panel tariffs increase the cost of US production of strength. And so on. This&nbsp, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-03-07/trump-s-tariffs-on-steel-aluminum-will-do-more-harm-than-good?sref=R8NfLgwS”>weakens US manufacturing&nbsp, and may harm US exports. 1

But between circumvention techniques, currency movements and harm to American companies, Trump’s levies on China ended up reducing the trade deficit a lot less than their engineers had hoped.

Even though Trump’s taxes are likely to be higher in a second word and Biden’s, these components will still have an impact. This is not to say that taxes are &nbsp, ineffectual&nbsp, — they’re just a weaker coverage instrument than their proponents like to believe.

Despite these fundamental weaknesses, tariffs are still&nbsp, an essential part of the toolkit&nbsp, for preserving offer chains and defence production capacity against the possibility of a major war.

However, it’s possible that tariffs will have other unanticipated benefits for people all over the world, including developing nations and Chinese consumers who are receiving bad deals from the nation’s current economic model.

We should also consider these advantageous side effects when we consider tariffs.

Tariffs might prompt China to reconsider its economic model.

Zongyuan Zoe Liu has &nbsp, a widely read article&nbsp, in Foreign Affairs this week about the drawbacks of China’s manufacturing-focused economic model.

The article excellently describes how manufacturing is promoted by China. Basically, it’s all about bank finance — banks loan huge amounts of money very cheaply to manufacturers, who then compete fiercely, resulting in a flood of cheap, often undifferentiated products.

Because all the Chinese manufacturers slam the market with goods they do n’t want to buy, these price wars cause collapsing profit margins. It also results in a flood of exports, as Chinese manufacturers try to&nbsp, sell their excess capacity overseas. And as a result, there is a mountain of corporate debt that obliges Chinese businesses to keep making interest payments even as they continue to be paid for it.

What’s interesting is that this is very similar to how&nbsp, Japan&nbsp, promoted manufacturing from the 1950s through the 1980s. As Chalmers Johnson explains in his book&nbsp,” Miti and the Japanese Miracle”, a key component of Japanese industrial policy was “overloaning” to manufacturers, using a combination of public and private banks.

Japan discovered that domestic overcapacity would only be a side effect of the domestic glut if it were to promote exports.

The main distinction between China and Japan is that the government of Japan attempted to counteract this overproduction by introducing price increases to prevent the country’s private companies from losing money. Cartels and other price-fixing measures – basically, antidotes to overcapacity – were one of the core features of Japan’s industrial policy.

China’s industrial policy, in contrast, &nbsp, leans in&nbsp, to overcapacity by dispensing&nbsp, absolutely massive government subsidies&nbsp, to manufacturers. This is why China’s overcapacity problem is much worse than Japan’s in the 20th century, which is why countries around the world are &nbsp, getting mad&nbsp, and&nbsp, putting up tariffs.

At the same time, China’s industrial policy is just exacerbating the price wars that are making its manufacturers unprofitable. Chinese consumers are unable to afford cheap goods because their employers had to lower their wages in order to sell more goods so they could pay off their loans, which is also hurting consumption.

Nobody benefits from creating an ocean of rusting metal and bankrupt companies because this system needs to change. Interestingly, though, Liu thinks tariffs are n’t the solution. She believes that developing nations should encourage China to voluntarily slash its exports and lessen their subsidies for its manufacturers:

China could start by developing more trade policies at the negotiation table rather than simply imposing tariffs. Since the escalation of the US-Chinese trade war, in 2018, Chinese scholars and officials have explored several policy options, including imposing voluntary export restrictions, revaluing the renminbi, promoting domestic consumption, expanding foreign direct investment, and investing in R &amp, D…

Apart from voluntary export restrictions, Beijing has already tried several of these options to some extent. It could kill several birds with one stone if the government started voluntary export controls, which would ease trade and potential political unrest with the US, force mature industries to consolidate and become more sustainable, and aid in the transfer of manufacturing capacity overseas to serve target markets directly.

However, Liu’s argument here goes against her own. She notes that China began exploring voluntary export restrictions, currency appreciation, domestic consumption promotion, etc. only because of Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods. There must be some kind of penalty for taking these steps, not for taking them, if the US wants to make Chinese policymakers consider these salutary options even more seriously.

In fact, earlier in her post, Liu lists tariffs as a big downside of China’s current overcapacity-promoting policies:

Since the mid-2010s, the problem has become a destabilizing force in international trade, as well. Chinese companies are pushing prices below the break-even point for producers in other countries by creating a glut of supply on the global market for many goods. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, criticized Beijing for engaging in unfair trade practices by releasing ever-larger quantities of Chinese goods onto the European market at unbeatable prices in December 2023. In April, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that China’s overinvestment in steel, electric vehicles, and many other goods was threatening to cause “economic dislocation” around the globe. Yellen remarked that” China is simply too large” for the rest of the world to take advantage of this enormous capacity.

For the US and other countries to spontaneously and voluntarily remove the threat of tariffs would thus&nbsp, remove one of the major downsides&nbsp, of overcapacity. If China were to simply ignore the warning and dump its excess capacity onto the rest of the world, it would be pointless to try to wheedle it into enacting voluntary export restrictions.

Yes, it would benefit the&nbsp, people&nbsp, of China if their government changed the country’s economic model to raise the living standards of ordinary consumers instead of encouraging unprofitable overproduction. However, the government would have already done it if it had been important to the country’s general population.

Therefore, the Chinese government needs a second motivation to change its economic model. That incentive is tariffs. When Chinese companies find themselves unable to offload their goods at any price, the US and other countries can quicken the day of reckoning by preventing China from using the rest of the world as a release mechanism for its overproduction. The Chinese government will have to determine how to reduce production in response to that assessment.

If China agrees to a voluntary export ban and increases its currency, the US and other nations can make an offer to remove tariffs at that point. But without the” stick” of tariffs to force China to deal with its own overcapacity, nothing is likely to change.

China’s tariffs could spur development in the Global South and possibly even the US.

Another significant benefit could China’s tariffs have for the rest of the world. One way for Chinese companies to partially avoid tariffs is to move their factories out of China to other countries, like Vietnam, Mexico, or Morocco.

Because China’s businesses are required to pay the labor, land, and energy costs in the nation where they set up their factories, this results in a slightly lower revenue. But Chinese companies still get to sell materials, parts, and components to their overseas assemblers, and they still get to keep the profits. So they get to&nbsp, partially&nbsp, avoid the impact of tariffs.

The US and other countries could close this partial loophole, if they really wanted to, by imposing tariffs on goods made by Chinese-owned&nbsp, companies&nbsp, instead of just on goods made in&nbsp, China. In order to avoid being caught up in the tariff regime, Chinese companies would attempt to establish elaborate systems of shell companies and foreign partners.

However, in the end, selling goods to America and other tariff-free nations would cause Chinese companies to become so congested that they might abandon their jobs and head elsewhere.

However, if the tariff-paying nations do n’t close this loophole, or only partially close it, such as by imposing tariffs on Chinese-made goods but not Chinese brands, it will be highly motivating for Chinese companies to set up factories abroad. In fact, as&nbsp, The Economist reports, this is already happening on a large scale:

]China’s ] greenfield FDI ( building a new mine or factory, say, rather than buying one ) surged to a record$ 162bn last year, up from$ 50bn a year before…Nearly three-quarters of that was in manufacturing …

By moving their production from China to other developing nations, some Chinese companies are attempting to circumvent trade restrictions. That is an approach long taken by Chinese solar firms, which were, in effect, locked out of the American market in 2012 by anti-dumping duties. America imports almost no solar panels directly from China, but buys lots from South-East Asia, where Chinese firms like JinkoSolar, Trina Solar and Longi, the world’s three largest producers of solar modules, have built big factories…

That approach is now being used in other sectors, which accounts for Chinese companies ‘ exploding manufacturing overseas. Although some factories are being built in the West, the lion’s share of activity is in the global south, home to nine of China’s top ten destinations for greenfield FDI last year… In July BYD, a Chinese electric-vehicle company, opened a new car factory in Thailand, its first in South-East Asia. Chinese battery company CTL is reportedly looking into investments in Morocco and Turkey as well as expanding production in South-East Asia.

And here is The Economist’s chart of where the Chinese investment is going:

It’s difficult not to see this as a good thing. The nations where China is investing are generally quite a bit poorer than China, excluding Saudi Arabia and Kazakhstan, which are obviously just energy plays.

Mexico is still slightly richer, but it’s stagnant.

In other words, these are all nations that could benefit greatly from Chinese manufacturing investments. China is becoming a mature economy, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Egypt, and Morocco still badly need the growth in living standards that foreign-owned factories help provide.

And it ‘s&nbsp, tariffs&nbsp, in the US and other countries that are making this happen. Other factors, such as rising Chinese labor costs and sluggish domestic demand, are influencing Chinese companies ‘ plans to set up factories overseas, according to The Economist, but tariffs are proving to be the driving force.

Many strong factors bias Chinese companies toward keeping their factories in China – lack of language barriers, ease of navigating local regulations, political pressure, and so on. The key motivation is a spread of wealth throughout the developing world through tariffs, which help to break this home bias.

Cynics may now say that Chinese companies will only export high-quality components to themselves while preserving high-quality assembly work there. Indeed, multinational corporations have done to China for a long period of time with this exact strategy!

As recently as the early 2010s, many Chinese factories&nbsp, were still stuck&nbsp, doing low-value assembly work on high-value components made in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, or the US, using machines made in Germany or Japan. It was only recently that China started doing more of the high-value component manufacturing, design, branding, and marketing.

But if China could climb up the value chain, then so can Vietnam, Indonesia, Morocco and Egypt. The factories that make the factories for China will eventually learn enough of the trade’s nuances to start producing more and more of the harder, more valuable goods.

The US and other tariff-paying nations can aid in accelerating that process. By putting tariffs on Chinese components, &nbsp, but not on Chinese brands, they can incentivize Chinese companies to move more of their high-value work to poorer countries in Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. Companies like BYD will only be able to avoid tariffs if they transfer their technology to developing nations.

In other words, tariffs by the US, Europe, and others might help usher in&nbsp, the next phase of globalization. They’re a costly, ineffective policy that occasionally backfires, but it’s still a fair price to pay to reverse the unsustainable, toxic pattern of China-centric globalization that persisted in the 2000s and 2010s.

1 Of course, you can get around this problem by only putting tariffs finished consumer goods, like cars or appliances. But the problem is that intermediate goods are &nbsp, most of what China sells to the U. S., and since&nbsp, one primary goal of tariffs&nbsp, is to secure US supply chains against a possible war, then tariffs on intermediate goods are unfortunately necessary.

This&nbsp, article&nbsp, was first published on Noah Smith’s Noahpinion&nbsp, Substack and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here and become a Noahopinion&nbsp, subscriber&nbsp, here.

Continue Reading

Bangladesh protests: After Sheikh Hasina fled, students dream of change

By:
On:
In: Asia
BBC JulkernayeemBBC

Students are taking to the streets in Dhaka to control visitors and keep things moving as police launch a strike following the uprising that overthrew prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

On the typically noisy and crowded streets of the Bangladeshi capital, the police, who are typically highly visible, are nowhere to be found.

After weeks of turmoil that have resulted in hundreds of fatalities, it seems as though just students and some armed forces are keeping the law and order. An interim federal is promised, but has yet to get business.

Following the deadly crackdown that sparked such a stir, police then worry about their health. It failed to stop anti-government demonstrations that had started last month over legal services work limits.

Noorjahan Mily

Two days after Ms. Hasina escaped to India, things are calmer, but there are still reports of occasional violence and looting.

Some Bangladeshis, particularly the young, expect the country is at a turning level.

” I want freedom of expression. I want a corruption-free state. I want people to have the proper to protest”, Noorjahan Mily, 21, an Open University undergraduate, told the BBC.

” I am uncertain about where the land is heading, because the state has changed. However, I will only be joyful when their needs are satisfied, regardless of whether the prejudice will continue.

Now that electricity has been seized from the hands of the nation’s long-standing king, the nation is now attempting to accept the impact of what has just transpired.

More than 400 people were killed in the new turmoil, most of them residents shot by security troops, but also a number of officers. The battle that led to the nation’s independence in 1971 is the bloodiest instance of this kind.

Reuters Members of the army clear an entrance of the Ganabhaban, the Bangladeshi prime minister's residence, a day after the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, August 6, 2024.Reuters

A security guard at the airport informed me that the government had used excessive force, and that the position was very poor.

” Several children – as young as six, seven and eight – were killed”, he said.

Outside the aircraft, kids wearing orange hi-vis jackets were directing customers.

” There’s no police here, only students”, the driver said. ” There is no state, kids are doing 100 % security”.

He agreed with the kids, saying they had done a good thing.

A group of kids were putting out foam cone to control the flow of vehicles as we passed.

” I’m here to help with traffic and my brothers ‘ protection.” From the very outset, I participated in the limit movements that turned into a huge motion”, Julkernayeem Rahat, a company management student at University of Asia Pacific, told the BBC.

EPA A Bangladeshi student tries to control the traffic as traffic policemen did not turn out on their duty, in Dhaka, Bangladesh, 07 August 2024. In an address to the nation, Chief of Army Staff General Waker-Uz-Zaman announced on 05 August that Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has resigned after weeks of unrest and an interim government will be formed to run the country. Bangladeshi President's press secretary announced on 07 August that Muhammad Yunus was chosen to be Bangladesh's interim leader after the resignation of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Dhaka following Bangladeshi prime minister's resignation, Bangladesh - 07 Aug 2024EPA

” We are glad we’ve removed the autocratic government. We have gained our liberty and our sovereignty”.

He was convinced that the person named as interim president, Nobel Laureate Muhammed Yunus, will be able to type a government after a few months” with the help of students, lawyers, public people”.

” Bangladesh’s future is in the hands of the student leaders. God willing, things will be good”, said the 22-year-old.

Mahamudul Hassan, 21, is studying on the same course.

” I want democracy so that people of all walks of life can enjoy equal opportunities, equal rights”. He envisions” a leader who can bring those things to pass.”

Mr Yunus was appointed to the post late on Tuesday by Bangladesh’s president, meeting a key demand of student protesters, who said they would not accept an army-led government. He may be sworn in on Thursday after recovering from surgery in France.

He stated to reporters on Wednesday at Paris Charles de Gaulle airport, where he was scheduled to take a flight to Dhaka, that he was looking forward to returning home and seeing what is happening and how we can organize ourselves to escape the trouble we’re in.

He has urged people to abstain from all forms of violence in response to reports of revenge attacks and looting on Sheikh Hasina’s supporters, warning that if they did not, they ran the risk of everything being destroyed.

The army chief assured the people that Mr. Yunus would be able to lead us through a beautiful democratic process in an address on Wednesday, and that we would gain from it.

Although how things turn out will be determined, the students appear to be doing a good job in terms of traffic management.

The BBC reported that things were running much better than they did when we traveled to January to watch the contentious elections that the main opposition boycotted, which resulted in Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League winning a fourth term in power.

When a group of men pulled large metal rods for a construction project, it almost seemed like business as usual.

” The traffic system is now better,” he declared. The students are successfully managing. It’s better than when the police were here”, said Mohammed Shwapan, who has been a Dhaka driver for 24 years. ” Today is busier than yesterday”.

He favors the appointment of an interim leader.

” As Mr Yunus is well known internationally, he can mitigate any potential economic collapse.

How will Bangladesh be able to handle payments, I asks,” I’m concerned about the international debt.” That’s why I think he can do a good job.”

The challenges ahead are enormous, and not just economic. Sheikh Hasina’s 15 years in power are still undergoing healing, many wounds.

Her administration is credited with bringing about many Bangladeshis ‘ standard of living to better health. But she was also accused of serious human rights abuses, including numerous extra-judicial killings and forced disappearances.

Many people have accounts of the experiences their families had.

On the plane to Dhaka, I managed to close my eyes for a few minutes. On the back pocket of the seat in front, I discovered a handwritten note on an airsick bag.

Someone claimed that Sheikh Hasina and his brother were the ones who kidnapped their father and killed him. For the safety of his wife and children, he had spent the last eight years living in self-imposed exile.

Now he is coming back to what he calls” a free country”, to visit his father’s grave, the note said.

Continue Reading

Muhammad Yunus: The Nobel winner tasked with leading Bangladesh

By:
On:
In: Asia
Getty Images Muhammad YunusGetty Images

After former prime minister Sheik Hasina resigned and fled the country after months of unrest, Muhammad Yunus, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, was chosen to lead Bangladesh’s time state.

A well-known critique of Ms Hasina, Mr Yunus called the day of Ms Hasina’s exit Bangladesh’s” next independence day”.

So what do we hear about the 84-year-old Nobel laureate?

Banker to the bad

Mr. Yunus was the only child born in Chittagong, a Muslim merchant family, in the southern area of Bangladesh. He left Bangladesh at age 25 to pursue a Foreign fellowship and traveled there for the next 25 years, the same year that Pakistan won its independence from Pakistan in a harsh, bloody conflict.

After winning the economics department at Chittagong University, Mr. Yunus immediately took up his passion for preventing the mid-’70s hunger that had ravaged Bangladesh.

In a 2005 presentation at the Commonwealth Institute in London, he said,” I became interested in the hunger matter not as a policymaker or scientist.” Because hunger was a constant source of my motivation, I became involved.

I wanted to help those around me right away, but I may not turn my head aside from it. ”

Mr. Yunus was a forerunner of the idea of “microcredit,” where people who are too poor to borrow from a traditional banks are given incredibly little loans, frequently enabling them to work independently.

Grameen Bank, the self-declared “pioneer entrepreneurship organization in the world,” was founded in 1983 by Mr. Yunus, who has since grown to more than nine million customers.

In a 2002 discussion with the BBC, he described entrepreneurship as a “need of the people”.

You must have those financial services coming to them because it is absolutely unfair, whatever name you give… to dispute half the population of the world economic services, ” he said.

Even gypsies had been able to borrow money through Mr. Yunus’s system because it was so successful.

According to the site for the Nobel Prize, Mr. Yunus and Grameen Bank were both honored with the Peace Prize in 2006.

However, some experts have criticized the concept of micro-financial institutions, claiming that they charge exorbitant interest rates and engage in aggressive debt collection practices.

Charges and slander strategies

However, even Ms. Hasina, the head he is currently expected to succeed him, has withstanded a barrage and disagreement in Bangladesh.

After announcing plans to launch his own” Citizen Power” party in 2007, he attracted the former prime minister’s indignation.

In 2011, Ms. Hasina infamously accused Mr. Yunus of having “sucking body from the poor ” and removed him from Grameen Bank. After signing a joint statement criticizing Uganda’s trial of queer people, he faced a state-backed smear campaign in 2013 that accused him of being anti-Islamic and pro-gay.

Additionally, Mr. Yunus has been accused of embezzling money from one of his company’s employees ‘ benefits finance and of receiving money without the government’s approval.

He was given a six-month prison sentence in January of this year for labor law breaches, which he denied, and he and 13 others were charged with larceny in June. He has since been released on bail, but he is currently facing allegations of graft and labor breaches in more than 100 circumstances.

Mr Yunus has denied all charges, claiming that strikes against him are politically motivated.

However, some of Mr. Yunus ‘ supporters claim that his intense dealings with Ms. Hasina have had a negative impact on his appeal.

A red tile with white text, the same format Mr. Mahmud has used for dozens of statements relating to the protests and their aftermath, was posted on Facebook on Tuesday by Asif Mahmud, a key figure in the Students Against Discrimination ( SAD ) movement.

This one had only five words: “ In Dr Yunus, we believe. ”

Continue Reading

Supplementary budget bill sails through Senate

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

PUBLISHED: 7 Aug 2024 at 05: 47

Food vendors register for the digital money handout scheme in Phra Nakhon district, Bangkok, on Aug 1. (Photo: Apichart Jinakul)
Food distributors register for the online cash handout scheme in Phra Nakhon area, Bangkok, on Aug 1. ( Photo: Apichart Jinakul )

The secondary bill passed all three observations on Tuesday in the Upper House, with the goal of increasing the president’s digital budget handout plan by 122 billion baht.

The voting saw 139 lawmakers in behalf, 38 against, and 18 nays.

Numerous senators questioned whether the government’s claim that the modern handout system would work in the debate leading up to Tuesday’s vote on the bill was true.

Norasate Prachyakorn, a senator from Bangkok, expressed concern that the government’s plan to support the handout scheme, which requires almost 500 billion baht in funding, will fail to achieve its goal of a 1.8 % increase in gross domestic product ( GDP ) by 2020.

Related sentiments were expressed by Senators Bunchan Nuansai and Premsak Piayura, who claimed the government’s flyer was nothing more than a plot to win the next general election.

Before becoming a senator, Daeng Kongma, who worked as a meat merchant in Amnat Charoen’s new market before becoming a senator, claimed the 10, 000-baht handout do encourage spending and may induce the local economy. Some people find it more difficult to use digital currency, she said.

Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin defended the 122-billion-baht auxiliary bill, saying the government should wait until the fiscal year 2025 to receive the necessary funding.

Of the more 122 billion ringgit, about 10 billion may come from taxes and additional revenue the government expects to receive, while the rest will come from borrowing, he said.

The state is in serious need of a funds to finance its efforts to stimulate economic growth, the PM said, given Thailand’s slow economic growth, higher household and corporate debt, and a highly volatile world economy.

He declared that the state’s fiscal and monetary discipline regulations would be strictly enforced.

Continue Reading

Man took advantage of mum’s dementia to withdraw S,000 from his parents’ joint account, gets jail

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

SINGAPORE: After his father rejected his requests for money, a jobless gambler began accompanying his mother grocery shopping, taking advantage of her dementia to get her to withdraw a total of about S$ 42, 000 ( US$ 31, 660 ).

The cash, which was in his parents ‘ combined account, was meant for the old woman’s medical costs for her situation.

Chow Zhida Gary, 37, was sentenced to 13 months ‘ jail on Tuesday ( Aug 6 ) for a crime the prosecutor called” cruel”.

The Singaporean admitted to three fraud counts.

Another three charges were taken into consideration, including pushing his old father and threatening a police officer, saying in Mandarin:” You want to enjoy large, come, I have a nasty or poor life, you want to play with me come, I have two children”.

According to the jury, Chow’s kids were both 80s taxpayers.

They shared a joint bank account, from which either may withdraw cash.

At the time of the crimes, Chow was unemployed and heavily in debt from playing.

He frequently eluded payment requests from his parents, but they never came back.

Knowing that his family suffered from memory, Chow usually accompanied her to get groceries.

He and his family escorted money on at least eight times between May 2020 and June 2020.

He did n’t tell his father about it because he was aware that she was incapable of explaining why she was assisting him in getting the money.

He consistently instructed his mother to take small steps to prevent sending his father an update about significant payments.

In full, S$ 38, 350 was withdrawn from his parents ‘ bank accounts. Chow deposited the remaining funds into his own account while keeping some of the money.

In late July 2020, Chow’s parents realised that there was only about S$ 49 left, yet though he remembered that being more than S$ 36, 000 outside.

He made a police statement.

Chow afterwards took his mother to a store where he demanded that she pay off another S$ 4, 000.

His father’s banks informed him that the joint account did not have the required amount needed to keep the account open in January 2021.

The old man requested additional police information to help pay for his wife’s health expenses.

On top of stealing from his own relatives, Chow even stole jewellery for about S$ 5, 000 from his 76-year-old uncle, pawning them off.

Chow lied and claimed that his mother had asked him to assist him with money withdrawal requests to offer to other family members or friends when he was being interrogated by the authorities.

When confronted by the numerous debris he had made into his own account, he admitted to using his mother’s mental illness to acquire funds for himself.

He has n’t returned any money to his parents or aunt to date.

The attorney requested 16 months in jail, noting that all of the stolen objects or funds were worth about S$ 5, 000.

He said what sets this circumstance apart from others was the” severe mistreatment of faith” against Chow’s mom, who was a vulnerable target.

He claimed the old woman needed the money for her health care, but Chow allegedly cheated on it, utilizing her dementia to the point where there was “literally nothing to steal.”

The attorney argued that the brutality shown to such a devoted and resilient victim serves as what distinguishes this case and justifies a thick sentence.

He claimed that Chow’s guilty plea, along with no compensation or assistance with the authorities, was nothing that could dampen his feelings.

Chow, who was disadvantaged, said nothing in reduction. He asked simply to postpone his word to Aug 12, citing his father’s day.

He was granted this demand.

Continue Reading

A tale of two bubbles – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Up until last week, investors believed that it stocks could only go up and the Chinese yen could only go along, and bubbles next until they feel like basics. By Monday’s business beginning, investors cowered for shelter as the two balloons popped in harmony.

Both the Biden administration in Washington and the Tokyo Kishida management engaged in the same untenable strategy, ballooning the government’s balance plate to raise asset prices.

The central banks held half of the remarkable fly of Chinese government securities by July 31 when the Bank of Japan announced that it would “taper” its payments of government securities and raised its short-term interest rate to 0.25 % from zero.

Japan’s debt-buying spree pushed up prices objectives, weakened the yen and buoyed Japan’s stock market during the past three years.

A rise in inflation and foreign earnings led to a shift in true wages, causing corporations to lose their federal income from households.

Graphic: Asia Times

The japanese exchange price, expected inflation ( as shown by the supply distinction between inflation-indexed and regular promotion government bonds ), and stock prices all moved in accordance with the above table. The August 5 period saw a decline in Japan’s big stock indexes, which recovered at the August 6 entry.

However, in the United States, the Biden administration tried to shovel wealth into customers ‘ pockets by increasing transport payments, as I explained in an August 2 study.

Washington’s choice of weapon was fiscal rather than monetary: Transfer payments ( federal checks to individuals ) rose nearly 20 % above the long-term trend.

According to Lawrence Summers, who was president Barack Obama’s Treasury Secretary, the actual inflation rate, which included higher interest rates on consumer loans, reached 18 % in 2023 and remained at 8 % in 2024, more than the official figure.

In May, American consumers began to reduce their financial purchases, and by July, employment growth had stopped.

In Japan’s event, a general rebellion by voters, who gave Prime Minister Kishida an approval rating of only 15.5 %, forced the hands of the Bank of Japan.

The prices that had been causing their living conditions long ago made Japanese voters uneasy. Consumers in the United States used credit cards to close the gap between average weekly earnings of 8 % and inflation, which had increased by only 3.3 % in July from the same month in 2023.

By June, US customers had stopped putting money on the table and cutting costs, and the inflationary balloon that was stifling US progress was beginning to devalue. Friday’s employment report, which showed the highest homeless level in three years, was a wake-up visit.

Graphic: Asia Times

Due to economic weakness, the massive estimates of Big Tech companies, whose massive opportunities in artificial intelligence had no apparent connection to future income, were questioned.

Graphic: Asia Times

We wrote in Asia Times ‘ &nbsp, Global Risk-Reward Monitor on July 31:” Since 2017, foreign holdings of US Treasuries have risen to$ 8 trillion from$ 6 trillion, while foreign holdings of US equities jumped to$ 15 trillion from$ 6 trillion. The dollar’s primary draw is America’s command in artificial knowledge and the microprocessor development that supports it. The money will also be vulnerable if technical shares lose their luster.

Graphic: Asia Times

The trailing P/E percentage of the S&amp, P Information Technology field was almost the same as the general S&amp, P 500 P/E throughout the ages 2008-2022. It’s then half again as great. Is that determined?

According to a widely-publicized estimate released by Sequoia’s David Cahn on June 20, revenue from large language models ( LLMs) must reach$ 600 billion annually to cover the significant investment in software, chips, and data centers currently devoted to AI.

OpenAI, meanwhile, is earning$ 3.4 billion a year, and according to The Information, losing$ 5 billion a year. A spiritual leap of faith is necessary to fit the prohibitive CapEx and LLM provider revenues.

The US property market downturn was largely caused by technology. Investors are concerned that the AI balloon will collapse, leading to a decade of missing returns for digital stock investors, similar to the dot-com balloon of the 1990s.

Observe David P. Goldman on X at @davidpgoldman

Continue Reading

Nikkei’s Black Monday 2.0 triggers contagion talk – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Buyers are looking for relationships, past occasions that offer some perspective on what may lie ahead for forex markets, as the Japanese yen surges.

The Nikkei 225 Stock Average is leading a worldwide property sell-off, leading to a frenetic research. The Bank of Japan’s July 31 price climb was followed by a softer-than-expected US work record. On Monday, the Nikkei plunged 4, 451 factors, more than Black Monday in 1987.

Probably, no great consequence exists owing to risks surrounding Japan thanks to the “yen-carry trade”. Although the US dollar is by far the most popular reserve currency, trade became as crowded as it ever was as a result of expensively borrowing in the yen and putting those funds into higher-yielding assets abroad.

This explains why, when the renminbi rises, things turn around for everything, from Chinese corporate debt to Indian property to American bonds to Brazilian options to Argentine bonds to Wall Street stocks to commodities. When the world’s largest creditor nation zags, issues tend to zigzag quickly.

” The hype is all about the disease consequence of this extreme keep assault, underscored by fears of a hard getting in the US and a severe meltdown in Tokyo’s markets, which now appear to be self-perpetuating”, says Stephen Innes, managing partner of SPI Asset Management.

According to Kinsale Buying analysts,” the yen have industry has been used to finance bull markets in almost every advantage over the years,” and if it is” starting to change, it has negative implications for stocks and other risk assets.”

Seldom is that truer than presently as Black Monday 2.0 knocks Asia, sending the Chinese yuan higher, too. &nbsp,

As the yen’s rebound against the dollar increased by about 13 % from the previous low on July, and stocks began to decline, the yen’s market tensions boiled over on Monday. The most danced decline in Japanese government bonds in more than 20 years is expected.

” Some investors who were borrowing japanese at low interest rates, converted them to US dollars and used this to get US companies”, notes Daniela Sabin Hathorn, senior industry analyst at Capital.com. However, with higher interest rates in Japan, they are now facing forex losses as well.

The Japanese background music of the global financial system has been playing for 25 years, transforming into the monetary liquidity version of the world’s financial system. That is now a sizable risk that traders are n’t all that knowledgeable about managing in real-time.

Part of the problem is complacency. Over the last two decades, investors have survived myriad moments of high yen-carry trade tension. Generally, though, the related hijinks in asset markets never quite matched fears about giant reckonings.

In this way, perhaps the carry trade is best understood as a shark from” Jaws.” The recurring theme of Steven Spielberg’s 1975 film is that the shark will always reappear when it’s least expected to — and with exponentially growing ferociousness.

Not because the threat is gone, just because the yen’s rally in support of the BOJ’s rate increase has n’t sunk a lot of large hedge funds. Contrary to what BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda predicted in the coming months, more rate increases will be made.

At the same time, Japan’s Ministry of Finance has been interviewing aggressively below the surface. These yen purchases, coupled with prospects for more BOJ tightening, could send the yen back to levels not seen in decades.

No one can say how unstable that might be. Since 1999, the BOJ has held rates at or near zero. Since 2001, it has been playing with quantitative easing. The result of all this free money is that almost every sector of Japan’s economy is now dependent, decade after decade.

Take Japanese government bonds ( JGBs ), which are still the biggest financial asset held by, well, everyone. If JGB yields rise toward 2 % or 3 %, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, endowments, the postal system and the growing ranks of retirees would sustain painful losses.

The BOJ is n’t moving forward with what Ueda did last week due to this mutually assured destruction dynamic. It’s impossible to predict where significant risks might arise now that the BOJ has entered these shark-infested financial waters.

Granted, there are valid reasons why the BOJ feels the need to tap the brakes. It is aware that Japan’s animal spirits were more killed by weak yen policies after more than 20 years.

Tokyo’s economic game was made more urgent by ultralow rates. Corporate executives were under increased pressure to innovate, reorganize, and swing for the fences as a result of the yen’s decline. Additionally, rising energy and food prices cause inflation in Japan, which hurts domestic purchasing power.

Ueda has also started the long-diverse normalization process. It is unpredictable about how foreign exchange markets are affected. and risking asset markets everywhere. Perhaps grave risk, if Team Ueda overplays its hand in tightening.

” The pivot towards a more hawkish policy stance by BOJ is adding to the general pressure on risk assets globally”, says Carlos&nbsp, Casanova, economist at Union Bancaire Privée. ” This shift comes as Japan moves away from its decades-long ultra-loose monetary policy, contributing to increased market volatility and uncertainty”.

More volatility is anticipated, according to Casanova, and the yen grew following the tightening move. But, he adds,” the domestic economy remains sluggish, while US demand is showing signs of softening. The weakening yen tailwind is likely to stop as anticipation for a Federal Reserve cut in September builds. Investors will need to see upside surprises in revenues and earnings to drive further increases as valuations are now at the upper end of their range, which is roughly 17.5 times earnings.

Udith Sikand, analyst at Gavekal Research, says “yen-funded carry trades causing a’ snowball effect’ for other asset classes” .He adds that such” self-reinforcing declines are usually only broken when macro fundamentals decisively shift, or policymakers step in to correct a problem”.

Because of its role as a source of funding for carry trades, Japan’s debt market has long been an anchor for global investors, Sikand explains. This is because the Bank of Japan has consistently tried to keep short rates at zero while putting forth comprehensive efforts to reduce longer-term government bond yields. Carry trades work so long as the funding currency depreciates, or at least remains stable. The death knell of these trades is an appreciation of the funding currency.

It follows that the yen’s surge “has triggered margin calls for yen-funded speculators”, Sikand says. It’s difficult to determine the overall size of these long-short positions, but anecdotal evidence suggests that the decline in high-yielding currencies like the Brazilian real and the Mexican peso, along with the sell-off in US tech stocks, is a result.

Concerns about US employment growth, with a dash of Warren Buffett, ratchet up the selloff.

According to Goldman Sachs economist Jan Hatzius, the odds of a US recession have increased from 15 % to 25 %. Generally, he notes,” we continue to see recession risk as limited” because of a dearth of serious imbalances. Even so, the outlook is becoming more uncertain.

Some think US worries are overdone. George Lagarias, chief economist at Mazars, argues that falling stocks are” not due to an impending recession. Stocks are naturally correcting, and bonds are rising due to worse-than-expected macroeconomic data”.

A further correction, according to Lagarias, would” then thin out the market and allow investors to re-deploy cash at more reasonable valuations” if the Fed responded quickly enough to prevent a risk assert correction from actually causing a recession.

Yet “one very important difference in 2024 is]the ] extreme degree to which risk assets have front-run Fed cuts”, says Bank of America Corp economist Michael Hartnett.

Meanwhile, news that Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway sell nearly half of its massive stake in Apple Inc. The Omaha-based conglomerate offloaded a little more than 49 % of its stake, a transaction that spooked US markets.

In Japan’s case, the trouble is that there’s no blueprint for what Ueda is trying to pull off. The BOJ tried it back in 2006 and 2007. The central bank was able to raise rates twice to 0.5 % at the time. Japan slid toward recession soon afterward, angering the political establishment.

As the stock market declines and growth contracts, Ueda would almost certainly face his own torrent of negative press. Can he survive the storm, or not? It’s anyone’s guess. However, all other world markets can do is to apprehensively anticipate that the BOJ will correct the rate hikes ‘ magnitude, timing, and sequence.

Tokyo will continue to” stay on its toes and closely watch market developments,” according to Yoshimasa Hayashi, a spokesman for the Japanese government.

The government will continue its efforts to completely deflationate and transition to a growth-driven economy, he added,” we’re aware there are various evacuations about the stocks plunge this time around, and about the status of the Japanese economy.”

Is it still unclear whether the investors ‘ long-feared “doom effect” results from a surge in the yen? That may not come to pass, meaning fears about the yen-carry trade blowing up are overdone. It’s just as likely, though, the shark will reappear in short order and spook traders around the globe.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading