Japan braces for a Trump trade war it can ill afford – Asia Times

Tokyo – Shigeru Ishiba, the prime minister, is dreading 2025 because of the wave of panic that is permeating the ceos of Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and other Japanese Inc. images.

Ishiba has been trying to establish himself as the head of Japan since October 1. The Liberal Democratic Party‘s burgeoning group, which has seen its approval ratings dip into the lower 30s, was made even more difficult by Donald Trump’s resounding victory about a fortnight afterwards.

The challenges are only intensifying as more information about Trump’s plan to launch his next trade conflict comes to mind. The Bank of Japan’s 2025 economic growth will already be affected by that, as well.

Until lately, Governor Kazuo Ueda argued the BOJ may become hiking rates once– perhaps at the December 18-19 table meeting. The” Trump business” arriving shortly could change that mathematics, and fast.

Trump’s subsequent trade war may be “very harmful to the earth economy”, predicts analyst Gary Hufbauer at the Peterson Institute of International Economics, a Washington-based consider tank.

Ishiba’s state was roiling to complete a new US$ 250 billion monetary stimulus package even before Trump made his announcement on November 26 that he would impose taxes on Canada and Mexico in addition to China. At a time when inflation is comfortably above the BOJ’s target of 2 %, the plan aims to increase revenues.

As Trump’s future trade war harms Ishiba’s economy and further destabilizes China’s fragile economy, there will likely be much more stimulus there.

In Beijing, President Xi Jinping’s efforts to boost growth are n’t gaining traction as hoped. In October, China‘s business revenue fell 10 % year-over-year. That was after a 27.1 % decline in September, the sharpest drop since early 2020.

The problems faced by Japan’s leading trading partner are a growing concern for Ishiba’s market as the Trump 2.0 wind techniques.

At his Mar-a-Lago in Florida, Ishiba had been attempting to arrange a conference with Trump. The desire was to repeat Shinzo Abe’s ways from 2016, when the then-prime secretary became the first foreign leader to love President-elect Trump’s band.

Trump World, though, is rebuffing Ishiba’s overtures. And in embarrassing fashion. The Logan Act, a 1799 law prohibiting private citizens from speaking with foreign governments, was invoked by Trump’s supporters.

Trump, however, was unconcerned about a meeting earlier this year with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Hungary’s right-wing leader Viktor Orban, and other world leaders.

Ishiba and Trump seem to have a very slim chance of settling things. Trump still harbors a lingering nostalgia for the days when Abe would propose his nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize. ( Unrelated, Abe was assassinated in 2022 ).

” It may be difficult to expect serious engagement by Ishiba or a successor in personal diplomacy with the next US president, for example, or with the Chinese or South Korean governments”, says Tobias Harris, founder of advisory Japan Foresight.

Analysts believe the odds are high that Trump will expand the 100 % tariffs he plans for Mexican-made vehicles, at least in some measure, to Japan and Korea.

Hence the panic at Toyota, Honda, Nissan and the headquarters of other Japanese automakers. Executives at Hyundai, Kia, and other leading South Korean automakers are also looking ahead to a Trumpian onslaught in the future.

Trump might not find China, Japan, or Korea to be as compliant as he would like. Since 2017, Asia has become less dependent on the US than it did when it was there. Due to their respective domestic dynamics, Trump might find Yoon and Korea President Yoon Yeol less eager to follow his demands.

From 2017 to 2021, Trump 1.0 tried to browbeat Abe’s government into a bilateral trade deal that few in Tokyo saw in Japan’s best interest. Trump also made an effort to reduce Tokyo’s annual protection payments by$ 8 billion in order to keep US troop levels in Japan. Yoon’s predecessor, Moon Jae-in, faced a similar set of Trump demands.

It’s not clear, however, that Ishiba’s LDP will be as eager to bow out to Trump now that approval ratings are set to drop into the 20s as they were in Abe’s day.

Abe’s efforts to placate Trump are given too much credit, according to popular opinion. Abe ran to Trump Tower in New York in November 2016 for an audience with the incoming president. Abe also supported many of Donald Trump’s eccentricities abroad.

Yet Trump’s first big decision was to leave the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, a cornerstone of Abe’s efforts to contain China. Nor did Abe’s acquiescence win Tokyo a pass on Trump 1.0 tariffs, which slammed the Japanese economy.

Moreover, Trump’s odd bromance with Kim Jong Un shocked the Tokyo establishment. Abe’s pal in the White House hurts Japan’s overall national security interests by allowing the North Korean leader to accelerate his nuclear program. And Trump humiliated Abe by revealing the haughty letter Abe wrote to the Nobel Committee.

His policy team will assess how few deliverables, if any, Abe secured by prostrating his government before Trump World as Ishiba considers whether to do so.

Any calculation also must include how the Trump 2.0 trade war will wreck Ishiba’s plans for Asia’s second-biggest economy.

Arthur Kroeber, an analyst at Gavekal Dragonomics, notes there are too many imponderables for leaders from Tokyo to Frankfurt to know what’s really coming.

It’s difficult to predict the future, especially if Donald Trump is involved, Kroeber says, and the economic policy whipsaw of the past few days confirms what Yogi Berra might have said.

He continues,” no sooner had Trump calmed markets by appointing Wall Street veteran Scott Bessent as his treasury secretary than he riled them up again by threatening to impose immediate tariffs of 25 % on Mexico and Canada, as well as a 10 % hike on China,” quickly contradicting Bessent’s numerous assurances that tariffs would be layered on gradually and for clearly defined purposes, rather than unleashed all at once.”

The lesson here, Kroeber notes, “is that the range of possible trade policies in Trump’s second term is wide, and bets on any particular outcome right now are speculative”.

What’s not speculative is that Japan’s economy is n’t exiting 2024 on sound footing. Ishiba’s party, for example, is almost linearly focused on raising the minimum wage to a level that would still be too low to boost demand: 1, 500 yen ($ 9.8 ) per hour.

Business groups are clamoring that this hourly rate is too high, despite this low average hourly wage.

According to Ken Kobayashi, the head of the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry,” small business owners in rural areas cannot make money if the wage increases are too rapid.” Adds Masakazu Tokura, head of the business federation or Keidanren:” It takes time for management to make improvement efforts”.

Along with slamming economic confidence and global supply chains, Trump’s tariffs will boost global inflation. That would make it difficult for the Federal Reserve to keep cutting rates, as the world’s markets are accustomed to.

Additionally, it places a strain on the BOJ. On the one hand, higher consumer prices would give Team Ueda more latitude to normalize rates that have been close to zero for 25 years. On the other hand, the yen might experience a yen-topping decline that would hurt the Tokyo stock market.

Currency analysts are worried about unintended consequences from Trump playing Canada off Mexico.

According to Kelvin Wong, an analyst at currency broker Oanda,” Canada is one of the largest trading partners with the US, where its exports are primarily energy-related.” Therefore, it’s likely that Canada’s export revenues will suffer significantly if these tariff measures are implemented by the incoming Trump administration, which will result in a negative feedback loop on the Canadian dollar.

Most of Trump’s taxes on North America tariffs would be passed along to consumers. According to C J Finn, an analyst in the auto sector at PwC, the chances of automakers suddenly increasing productivity to offset tariffs are not encouraging.

Daniel Roeska, an analyst at Bernstein thinks Volkswagen, General Motors, Ford and Stellantis would be hardest hit. ” A 25 % tariff on Mexico and Canada would severely cripple the US auto industry”, he says. That, Roeska adds, would cause such a significant decline in US industrial production that” we expect this to be unavoidable in practice.”

According to Jeong Min Pak, an analyst at Fitch Ratings, the tariffs Trump has already described” could impact the profitability of Korean and Japanese automakers with imports from domestic facilities or Mexico.”

The EU’s high import duties against Chinese battery electric vehicles, Pak says, “are also likely to temper China’s exports. Fitch anticipates that the shifting of the focus to “developing markets” will encourage competition and have the potential to accelerate electrification of these markets.

Additionally, there are other ways BOJ policy and Trump’s stated desire to devalue the dollar could conflict, including by having direct control over Fed rate decisions. The ways that could trash the dollar’s credibility are hard to calculate.

Then there’s the China factor. It’s fantastic to think that Xi Jinping, the leader of China, wo n’t retaliate as Trump continues to impose trade restrictions and meddle in the currency, is. A sharply weaker yuan might be developed by China. A wider descent across Asia would result from that.

Xi wants to avoid doing so for a variety of reasons. It might stifle efforts to establish international respect for the Yuan. Additionally, it might increase the risk of default for large property developers who work offshore.

But with Trump nominating China hardliner Jamieson Greer as the next US trade representative, it’s hard to see trade tensions easing. Greer is a protege of Robert&nbsp, Lighthizer, Trump’s former and likely one of his future top trade advisers. Lighthizer is a major proponent of dollar devaluation.

Greer calls for a significant decoupling from China and sees it as a “generational challenge.” This view of Trump as a world ignores China’s potential retaliation, including steps to weaken the yuan.

As Japan finds itself caught directly in the crossfire, the nation’s debt load seems poised to increase markedly. This might force Ishiba, a long-time fiscal hawk, to accept a debt-to-GDP ratio far higher than today’s more than 260 %.

Indeed, Ishiba seems to be embracing increased borrowing at a rapid clip, pivoting to the policies of predecessor Fumio Kishida, who championed “wealth redistribution”.

When Ishiba was asked about his upcoming economic package, Ishiba told the parliament last week that” we will take comprehensive steps by giving cash handouts to low-income families that are most severely impacted by rising prices and providing subsidies to local governments based on their needs.

Ueda’s plight at the BOJ is only made worse by this reality. Tokyo’s debt burden could get worse every time the BOJ raises rates beyond the current 0. 25 % level. As of the end of 2023, Tokyo’s national debt was about$ 9.2 trillion, or 2.4 times bigger than Germany’s GDP.

Tokyo would likely face a mini-crisis if the yields of Japan rose, which would be combined with a trade war that Asia has never witnessed. If global investors take a fresh, hard look at Japan’s demographic crisis, which is brought on by a rapidly aging population, falling birthrate, and rampant government debt, that risk could grow even worse.

All of this explains why Ishiba and Ueda are undoubtedly depressed by Trump 2.0. And they’re surely not alone across trade-dependent Asia.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Germany closing factories at home, opening them in China – Asia Times

Germany’s biggest technological people are moving away from home to more positive circumstances in China as a result of its domestic energy guidelines and economic environment. Germany’s environment is increasingly hostile to business growth due to rising energy costs, high green energy subsidies, and strict regulations.

As a result, some of Germany’s most established companies are downsizing at house, shedding tens of work, while investing heavily in China. This change underlines the tremendous impact of existing policies on Germany’s professional scenery, with long-term implications for the local market and employment.

Here, Asia Times examines the main aspects and the businesses that are changing their business models worldwide.

Higher energy costs in Germany: The result of ideological laws

Germany’s energy policies have caused business energy prices to rise to amounts that are among the highest in the world, behind only the UK and the UK. Actually this high cost level, which has already reached unparalleled levels, cannot be sustained because the average cost for industrial users may have reached about US$ 250 per MWh by 2023.

Germany’s rely on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, combined with the pulling out of nuclear energy, has increased the government’s reliance on imports and caused significant price fluctuation, eventually putting stress on both business and citizens. Due to rising costs, some businesses are considering reducing their businesses in Germany and starting new ones, especially in China.

Consumption of industrial strength has decreased by more than 16 % in the last two decades.

In 2023, power consumption in Germany’s business sector fell to 3, 282 petajoules, a decrease of 7.8 % compared to 2022. This drop followed an already significant reduction in 2022, when industrial energy use fell by 9.1 % year-on-year to 3, 558 petajoules. Taken together, these cuts represent an overall increases in industrial energy usage of about 16.3 % over the two-year time.

Graphic: Asia Times

Energy source in Germany: Increased trade dependence

German domestic energy production has also changed, with renewable energy sources generating a record 61 % of the country’s energy mix in the first half of 2024. In the first quarter of 2024, Germany’s reliance on foreign energy sources to complement its varying renewable production has increased by 23 % in this period.

Businesses that require steady, affordable electricity are at risk because of the variability of the supply of renewable energy, combined with rising home prices. Germany’s continued emphasis on solar is also expected to increase buy dependency, more discouraging companies from expanding internally.

Large subsidies for solar

In 2024 only, Germany will deliver 20 billion dollars in subsidies to alternative energy producers. Despite quickly falling market prices, these payments guarantee that solar energy suppliers receive set-assigned minimum prices.

The state budget has been burdened greatly by this centrally planned program, which allows the government to pay clean energy suppliers when wholesale prices drop.

In fact, the original budget for subsidies in 2024 was 10.6 billion euros ( US$ 21 billion ), but as energy prices have fallen, the projected need has doubled. Given the government’s commitment to follow the debt brake, these increasing subsidies are putting more pressure on the budget and making negotiations more difficult.

The Nord Stream pipelines and lost Russian gas played a significant role in Germany’s professional decrease.

Germany’s power landscape has been severely affected by the withdrawal of Russian gas imports, which has severely impacted its industrial base and increased energy costs. Russian natural gas was a core of Germany’s power source, providing reliable and affordable energy for years. However, this crucial strength link was cut short by the political effects of the Ukraine war and the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage in September 2022.

The problems rendered Nord Stream 1 entirely useless, and one of the two pipes of Nord Stream 2 was even damaged. Just one part of Nord Stream 2 is still in use and functional. If Germany was willing to engage with Russia politically and economically, President Vladimir Putin just reaffirmed that this operational pipeline was resume sales right away.

Putin and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz recently spoke in conversation, emphasizing that restarting oil travels through Nord Stream 2 was” a matter of pressing a box,” indicating that Russia was willing to provide fuel if Germany cooperated.

German gas had to be replaced by much more expensive liquefied natural gas ( LNG ) imports, primarily from the United States, after Russia’s abrupt loss of oil. These raised prices have undermined Germany’s international business competitiveness.

Putin’s suggestion to restart the last Nord Stream 2 pipeline highlights the corporate sway Russia also has over Europe’s energy source. By offering a possible crutch to Germany’s ailing business, Putin aims to control Germany’s social position on the Ukraine conflict. Germany has abstained from responding to the proposal despite the potential economic benefits of a resumed gas imports.

Falling domestic investment in Germany

Domestic investment has decreased significantly as a result of rising energy costs and regulatory challenges. Private gross fixed capital formation is about 10 % below pre-covid levels.

The situation is even worse for industrial production: Since 2021, Germany’s production level has fallen by more than 9 %. The decline has been even sharper in energy-intensive industries. In those areas, production levels have fallen by more than 18 % in less than two years, which indicates serious issues in industries that are heavily reliant on affordable energy.

Graphic: Asia Times

This decline may have had an impact on the cost structure of these industries because of rising energy costs and the ongoing shift toward renewable energy sources. The trend suggests potential deindustrialization pressures, particularly in sectors that are unable to adjust to rising operating costs.

Many businesses are cutting jobs at home while expanding in China as a result of Germany’s unsustainable cost environment.

The biggest German businesses are investing in China instead of reducing their workforce there.

    Volkswagen: Facing potential job cuts of up to 30, 000 in Germany, Volkswagen has made significant investments in China, including 2.5 billion euros ($ 2.6 billion ) to expand EV production in Hefei and a further 700 million euros in EV technology partnership with Xpeng.
  • Bosch: Announced plans to cut 7, 000 jobs in Germany as it increases investment in China’s e-mobility and automated driving sectors.
  • SAP: &nbsp, Plans to cut 9, 000 to 10, 000 jobs in Germany while reallocating resources to high-growth markets abroad.

As German businesses are putting more and more money under the belt, these cuts are a part of a wider trend. The Association of the Bavarian Economy (vbw ) estimates that the automotive sector in Bavaria alone could lose 106, 000 jobs by 2040, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of Germany’s industrial challenges.

Hildegard Müller, president of the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA ), warns that up to 190, 000 jobs across the sector could be at risk by 2035, reflecting the risks associated with Germany’s deindustrialization.

In response to these developments, Scholz’s government has initiated urgent talks with industry leaders. Industry experts contend that these discussions lack the long-term strategic vision required to address fundamental issues like high costs, regulatory pressures, and labor costs. Without significant structural reforms, the German automotive sector risks a further decline in global competitiveness.

Soaring German investment in China: Record levels

German companies continue to place record levels of investment in the nation despite pressure from German government officials and the EU to reduce their dependence on China. In recent years, German investment in China has increased to unheard levels, primarily in the chemicals and automotive industries.

In the first half of 2024 alone, German foreign direct investment ( FDI) in China reached 7.3 billion euros, surpassing the 6.5 billion euro total for the whole of 2023. German automakers and Germany are increasingly influencing Chinese foreign direct investment, accounting for 57 % of total EU investment in China in the first half of 2024, 62 % in 2023, and a record 71 % in 2022.

Key investment projects:

  • Volkswagen: In addition to its 2.5 billion euro investment in Hefei, Volkswagen has increased its joint venture stake in JAC Motor from 50 % to 75 %. This move underlines Volkswagen’s long-term commitment to local vehicle production in China, a market crucial to its growth in electric vehicles.
  • BMW: BMW’s investment in Shenyang not only expands its production, but also its research and development capabilities, aligning with local demand and avoiding the high energy costs in Germany.
  • BASF: The chemical company’s 10 billion euro plant in Guangdong is another example of large-scale localization. By operating in China, BASF lowers German regulations and energy costs while satisfying China’s growing demand for advanced chemical products, particularly in the automotive industry.

These initiatives are based on a localized production approach that helps businesses avoid the difficulties and costs of exporting from Germany and meet Chinese market demands.

Germany’s lead in expanding greenfield investments in the EU

The second quarter of 2024 saw the highest quarterly level to date for greenfield investment by the EU reach a record 3. 6 billion euros. German automakers have been a significant contributor to this growth, accounting for roughly half of all EU investments in China since 2022.

While average quarterly M&amp, A activity declines by 30 % between 2022 and the first half of 2024, greenfield investments by EU firms have steadily increased, with Germany’s automotive and chemicals sectors leading this trend.

Between 2022 and the first half of 2024, 65 % of all EU FDI in China will come from Germany, up from 48 % between 2019 and 2021. The top five European investors in China in 2023 were German companies, underlining Germany’s key role in EU-China investment.

Countries like France, the Netherlands, and Denmark, for example, will contribute only 7-8 % of EU FDI during this time, while the remaining 23 EU Member States will contribute only 12 % of that percentage.

Localizing supply chains and reducing geopolitical risks

German businesses are also restructuring their supply chains to reduce risk as a result of rising energy prices and regulatory uncertainty. Companies have been prompted to localize their operations in key markets as a result of events like the Covid-19 pandemic and the Suez Canal disruption, which have highlighted the fragility of global supply chains. German businesses are responding by increasing direct production in China, which reduces both the cost and the risk of global supply chain disruptions.

According to Friedolin Strack of the Federation of German Industries ( BDI), businesses in China are increasingly “reorganizing their supply chains regionally.” In a world where Chinese EV manufacturers are gaining market share, German automakers like Volkswagen and BMW are focusing on localizing their EV supply chains to stay competitive. German businesses are reducing costs by investing in localized production as well as protecting themselves from global uncertainties.

reducing German exports to China through local production

In the first seven months of 2024, Germany and China’s bilateral trade decreased by 5.7 % as a result of the transition to localized production. German exports to China fell by 11.7 % year-on-year, as companies increasingly serve Chinese consumers directly through local production.

German automakers, which are producing cars directly in China rather than exporting them, are especially attracted to this decline in exports. As less of German-made goods are exported abroad while localized production in China is growing, this could have an impact on Germany’s trade balance.

China’s unique advantages for German companies

While the German government and the European Commission advocate diversification away from China, alternative markets lack China’s infrastructure, market scale and cost efficiency. Countries such as Vietnam and Thailand, while considered as diversification options, cannot match China’s industrial networks, skilled workforce and market size.

Since 2022, more than 50 % of all EU investment in China has come from German companies, mainly in the automotive and chemical sectors. Major projects, such as Volkswagen’s partnership with Xpeng and BASF’s production facility, underline Germany’s strategic focus on China as a key market for long-term growth and competitiveness.

Domestic policy and global competition fueled a strategic reorientation

German companies ‘ decision to restrict domestic investment and expand in China is a stark reflection of Germany’s current energy policy and regulatory pressures. High costs, variable energy supply and regulatory challenges have made Germany a difficult environment for large-scale industrial investment, while China offers stability, cost-efficiency and market growth potential.

These trends suggest that domestic structural issues must be addressed as Germany attempts to maintain its industrial base. Without reforms to lower energy costs and reduce regulatory burdens, the shift of German investment to China is likely to continue, with long-term implications for Germany’s trade balance, industrial output and economic resilience. Even the EU tariffs wo n’t play a significant role.

Continue Reading

Singapore households should remain prudent amid global risks: MAS

SINGAPORE: The risks to households in Singapore are expected to be contained, but the sector should continue to exercise prudence, the Monetary Authority of Singapore ( MAS ) said on Wednesday ( Nov 27 ).

According to the regulator and central bank’s monthly fiscal stability review, households have solid financial buffers, and stable income growth and mortgage rates have been helped by debt servicing ability.

Additionally, it noted that households ‘ liquidity levels have improved, with increases in income and deposits outpacing home liabilities overall.

The personal housing market has been stabilising, so property price volatility danger may be contained.

” However, given the heightened political risks and trade conflicts in the macrofinancial environment, families should continue to exercise caution in their financial control”, MAS said.

HOMEHOLDS ARE QUICK TO SERVICE DEBTS.

Though household debt increased in the past month, economic assets grew faster, the statement said.

Cover loans, which are secured by home collateral, account for about three-quarters of all household debt.

In comparison to the same time last year, excellent housing mortgages increased by 1.6 % in the third quarter. Borrowers ‘ ability to refinance their existing mortgages was generally accounted for by higher interest rates.

Families continue to be able to pay their debts.

According to MAS, a stress test on households, assuming an immediate increase in mortgage rates to 5.5 % and a 10 % increase in income are both evidence that debt servicing capacity is sufficient to withstand adverse shocks.

In such a situation, a small number of highly leveraged loans would be in danger, while over 90 % of households would be able to pay their mortgages. However, these loans may not have any simulation-compliant cash buffers or Central Provident Fund benefits.

Continue Reading

Meet to focus on Chiang Mai flood recovery

Chang Klan Road in Muang Chiang Mai was inundated in September. (Photo: Public Relations Department)
In September, Muang Chiang Mai’s Chang Klan Road was flooded. ( Photo: Public Relations Department )

In order to restore Chiang Mai to its natural state following major storms, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra may keep her second mobile cabinet meeting in Chiang Mai under the heading” From Flood To Flourish.”

The repair project has been allocated a 256 million baht funds, with proposals from the Chiang Mai business area.

According to government official Jirayu Houngsub, Ms. Paetongtarn is preparing to travel to Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai, two counties that have recently experienced flooding. From November 28 through December 1, she will chair her earliest mobile cabinet meeting and lead official inspection trips it.

Ms Paetongtarn’s attend to the top North may focus on pressing issues, including monitoring the problems of cloud and forest fire smoke, as well as PM2.5 good dust pollution, which is widespread during the great season in the North. The boundary drug trafficking will also be on the agenda for the meeting.

Tourism development after the floods will be higher on the agenda as well. Due to the floods, the market experienced a setback, and visitor confidence needs to be restored, which will help to revive the area’s economy.

On November 29, Chiang Mai will host the portable cabinet meeting.

Through 18 tasks, including path repairs and the re-landscaping of flood-stricken areas, one of the therapy proposals is to rebuild and strengthen basic infrastructure. Additionally, hillside structure protection developments and spillway gates that control the flow of water need to be fixed.

Five hospitality restoration initiatives are in progress, including making Chiang Mai a world heritage city and conducting additional tourism promotion initiatives.

In addition, reduction measures have been suggested to help flood victims, including extending the deadlines for paying business income and rate increases for land and building taxes, suspending loan and interest payments, removing import duties for equipment parts and components, removing electricity and tap waters fees for disturbed businesses, and social security measures.

In his capacity as director of the disaster operations center, deputy prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai claimed a working group had already planned a long-term solution for flooding and landslides in the North.

Continue Reading

Meet to focus on Chiang Mai recovery

Chang Klan Road in Muang Chiang Mai was inundated in September. (Photo: Public Relations Department)
In September, Muang Chiang Mai’s Chang Klan Road was flooded. ( Photo: Public Relations Department )

In order to restore Chiang Mai to its natural state following major storms, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra may keep her second mobile cabinet meeting in Chiang Mai under the heading” From Flood To Flourish.”

The repair project has been allocated a 256 million baht resources, with proposals from the Chiang Mai business area.

According to government official Jirayu Houngsub, Ms. Paetongtarn is preparing to travel to Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai, two counties that have recently experienced flooding. From November 28 through December 1, she will chair her earliest mobile cabinet meeting and lead official inspection trips it.

Ms Paetongtarn’s attend to the top North may focus on pressing issues, including monitoring the problems of cloud and forest fire smoke, as well as PM2.5 good dust pollution, which is widespread during the great season in the North. The boundary drug trafficking will also be on the agenda for the meeting.

Tourism campaign after the floods will be higher on the agenda as well. Due to the floods, the market experienced a setback, and visitor confidence needs to be restored, which will help to revive the area’s economy.

On November 29, Chiang Mai will host the smart cabinet meeting.

Through 18 tasks, including path repairs and the re-landscaping of flood-stricken areas, one of the therapy proposals is to rebuild and strengthen basic infrastructure. Additionally, hillside structure protection developments and spillway gates that control the flow of water need to be fixed.

Five hospitality restoration initiatives are in progress, including making Chiang Mai a world heritage city and conducting another tourism promotion initiatives.

In addition, reduction measures have been suggested to help flood victims, including extending the deadlines for paying business income and rate increases for land and building taxes, suspending loan and interest payments, removing import duties for equipment parts and components, removing electricity and tap waters fees for disturbed businesses, and social security measures.

In his capacity as director of the disaster operations center, deputy prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai claimed a working group had already planned a long-term solution for flooding and landslides in the North.

Continue Reading

FinanceAsia Achievement Awards 2024: the winners | FinanceAsia

FinanceAsia ‘s&nbsp, annual Achievement Awards recognise excellence across the divers financial markets of Asia Pacific ( Apac ) and the Middle East.

The Achievement Awards, which span five distinct categories, include Deal Honors for Apac and the Middle East, House Awards for Apac and the Middle East, and our Dealmaker Poll, show the achievements of major players in these areas as well as those who have shown commitment to their industry.

We’re pleased to announce that the judging process for this year’s awards has now come to an end after receiving almost 1, 000 submissions from our Advisory Board of external specialists and the help of our editorial staff.

Below are the types and winners’ respective links. &nbsp,

The logic behind success collection will get published in our upcoming&nbsp, FinanceAsia&nbsp, reports. Please call the&nbsp, FinanceAsia staff if you have any concerns. &nbsp,

You see all the winners below: &nbsp,

FinanceAsia Achievement Awards 2024: Apac’s best talks

FinanceAsia Achievement Awards 2024: Middle East’s best offers

FinanceAsia Achievement Awards 2024: Dealmaker Poll finalists

FinanceAsia&nbsp, Achievement Awards 2024: Apac’s best funding homes

FinanceAsia&nbsp, Achievement Awards 2024: Middle East’s best funding houses

¬ Capitol Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

How Trump plans to seize the power of the purse from Congress – Asia Times

This content was originally published by ProPublica, a Pulitzer Prize-winning analytical newspaper.

Donald Trump has a bold plan to cut a number of federal service as he enters his second term. Trump and his supporters intend to challenge an obscure legal theory that states that presidents have broad authority to deny funding from programs they oppose rather than relying on his side’s control of Congress to reduce the budget.

” We can essentially drown off the money”, Trump said in a 2023 plan picture. It was undeniable that the leader had the legal authority to halt unneeded spending for 200 times under our system of government.

His plan, known as “impoundment”, threatens to inspire a big fight over the boundaries of the government’s power over the finances. The professional branch’s responsibility is to effectively distribute the funds, whereas the Constitution grants Congress the ultimate authority to do so. However, Trump and his experts claim that if he opposes or thinks they waste money, he can unilaterally disregard Congress ‘ spending decisions and “impound” resources.

Trump’s models on the funds are part of his administration’s larger strategy to consolidate since much energy in the professional tree as possible. He pressed for the Senate to go into corner this month to assign his government without any supervision. Republicans in charge of the room have so far declined to do so. His key experts have spelled out plans to bring independent organizations, such as the Department of Justice, under democratic control.

If Trump were to veto congressionally authorized programs, it would almost certainly spark a battle in the courts and Congress, according to experts, and it would ultimately affect the foundation of Congress.

Eloise Pasachoff, a Georgetown Law teacher who has written about the national finances and appropriations process, said,” It’s an effort to take the full power of the purse apart from Congress,”” but that’s just not the legal design.” The president is not permitted to “pull out the things he does n’t want” and “go into the budget” slowly.

Trump’s claim to have impoundment power is in contravention of a Nixon-era law that forbids presidents from cutting spending and a number of federal court decisions that forbid presidents from repressing spending without the consent of Congress.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, the newly established non-governmental Department of Government Efficiency, announced in an op-ed published on Wednesday that they planned to reduce federal spending and fire civil servants. Some of their efforts could result in Trump taking his first Supreme Court appearance under the post-Watergate Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, which requires the president to spend money that only the people who vote vote to receive it. The law allows exceptions, such as when the executive branch can spend less money to accomplish Congress ‘ objectives, but not as a means for the president to sabotage initiatives he opposes.

Trump and his supporters have been leaking their plans for a hostile budgeting process for months. In his campaign video, Trump criticized the 1974 law as” not a very good act” and said,” Bringing back impoundment will give us a crucial tool to obliterate the Deep State.”

Musk and Ramaswamy have seized that mantle, writing,” We believe the current Supreme Court would likely side with him on this question”.

Thanks to former Trump administration employees who continue to be his close allies, the once-obscure debate over impoundment is in high demand in MAGA circles. Russell Vought, Trump’s former budget director, and Mark Paoletta, who served under Vought as the Office of Management and Budget general counsel, have worked to popularize the idea from the Trump-aligned think tank Vought founded, the Center for Renewing America.

On Friday, Trump announced he had picked Vought to lead OMB again. In a statement, Trump said,” Russ knows exactly how to end the Weaponized Government and bring about the return of self-government to the people.”

Vought was also a prominent figure in Project 2025, which was highly contested. Vought boasted in private remarks to a gathering of MAGA luminaries that ProPublica identified as having assembled a” shadow” Office of Legal Counsel so that Trump is fully prepared for his agenda on day one.

According to Vought,” I do n’t want President Trump to lose a moment of time in legal, doable, or moral debates in the Oval Office.”

Vought and Trump spokespeople did not respond to requests for comment.

Trump’s potential to swob inordinate control of federal funds is not just about reducing the size of the federal government, a long-standing conservative goal. Additionally, it aggravates existing concerns about his vengeance promises.

A similar power grab led to his first impeachment. Trump pressured President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to launch a corruption investigation into Joe Biden and his family while holding up nearly$ 400 million in military aid to Ukraine during his first term. In the end, the US Government Accountability Office determined that his deeds were in violation of the Impoundment Control Act.

Pasachoff predicted that the incoming Trump administration would attempt to accomplish the impoundment goals without choosing a fight with such a high profile.

According to Bobby Kogan, a former OMB adviser under Biden and senior director of federal budget policy at the left-leaning think tank American Progress, Trump used piecemeal methods to withhold federal funding in order to punish his perceived enemies. Trump delayed or refrained from signing disaster declarations that would have opened up federal aid because neither state had voted for him after the devastating wildfires in California and Washington. He focused on so-called sanctuary cities by limiting local law enforcement’s capacity to support mass deportation efforts. In the end, the policy was withheld by the Biden administration.

According to Trump and his supporters, Thomas Jefferson was the first to impound the president’s long history.

According to Zachary Price, a professor at the University of California College of the Law in San Francisco, the military and instances where presidents were expressly permitted to use discretion are the most prominent historical examples. For instance, Jefferson made the decision to not use the money that the law authorized him to use to fund” a sum not exceeding fifty thousand dollars” to fund gunboats, which authorized him to do so.

President Richard Nixon took impoundment to a new extreme, wielding the concept to gut billions of dollars from programs he simply opposed, such as highway improvements, water treatment, drug rehabilitation and disaster relief for farmers. Both the courts and Congress overwhelmingly opposed him. In the end, the Supreme Court and more than a half-dozen federal judges decided that Nixon had no authority to cut specific programs under the appropriations bills.

Vought and his allies argue the limits Congress placed in 1974 are unconstitutional, saying a clause in the Constitution obligating the president to “faithfully execute” the law also implies his power to forbid its enforcement. Trump likes to say that Article II, where this clause is located, grants him” the right to do whatever I want as president.”

The Supreme Court has never directly questioned constitutionality in regards to impoundment. But it threw water on that reasoning in an 1838 case, Kendall v US, about a federal debt payment.

” To contend that the obligation imposed on the President to see the laws faithfully executed, implies a power to forbid their execution, is a novel construction of the constitution, and entirely inadmissible”, the justices wrote.

During his cutting spree, Nixon’s own Justice Department argued roughly the same.

In a 1969 legal memo, Nixon later appointed the Office of Legal Counsel, William Rehnquist, warned that” we must come to the conclusion that the existence of such a broad power is supported by neither reason nor precedent.”

To receive news like this in your inbox, sign up for ProPublica’s The Big Story newsletter.

Continue Reading

Vietnam death row tycoon begs court for her life

A Vietnamese property tycoon who was imprisoned to death for a multi-billion-dollar fraud begged a court to spare her life on Tuesday ( Nov 26 ), claiming she was attempting to pay back the stolen funds. One of the biggest problem instances in history, residence designer Truong My Lan, 68,Continue Reading