GE2025: ‘Difficult’ GST hike needed to deliver on promises to seniors, says PAP’s Chee Hong Tat

Mr. Chee, a member of the ruling People’s Action Party ( PAP ), claimed that the majority of Singapore’s GST revenue comes from foreigners, tourists, and the less fortunate.

It is not the case with our lower- and middle-income families. It is not the Singaporeans with lower and middle incomes. They receive a much lower effective GST rate than 9 %, according to Mr. Chee.

” We have actually delayed the Taxpayer increase for the majority of Taiwanese households by at least five years, and by more than ten for lower-income households,” according to the Assurance Package.

” We have assisted many communities in coping with the increases in their spending,” according to our numerous help items. And we’re willing to help you for as long as it’s needed. “

Mr. Chee claimed that the GST-acquired income is a “progressive” system that provides the state with the assets it needs to support Singaporeans in many areas, including medical, education, cover, and public transportation. It is also derived from the income of tourists, foreigners, and the better-off.

Therefore, if we reduce the GST, we will avoid the money that we collect from these organizations that are already generating income for Singaporeans now, according to Mr. Chee, who is also the Minister for Transport.

In an age culture and now, in a more turbulent world, to help Singaporeans, to aid our organizations, to help our staff, to support our people, we would not have the resources to support our elders. “

Continue Reading

A Chinese prison helped fuel the deadly fentanyl crisis in the US – Asia Times

This article was originally published by ProPublica, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom.

Reporting Highlights

  • Pipeline: A Chinese prison is part of the pipeline that delivers fentanyl to the US, ProPublica found in a review of US and Chinese documents and interviews with investigators.
  • Fallout: Opioid overdoses have killed more Americans than the number of US deaths in several wars combined.
  • Permissive: Veteran federal agents told ProPublica that China has failed to cooperate and even interfered with drug investigations; China insists it has cracked down.

China’s vast security apparatus shrouds itself in shadows, but the outside world has caught periodic glimpses of it behind the faded gray walls of Shijiazhuang prison in the northern province of Hebei.

Chinese media reports have shown inmates hunched over sewing machines in a garment workshop in the sprawling facility. Business leaders and Chinese Communist Party dignitaries have praised the penitentiary for exemplifying President Xi Jinping’s views on the rule of law.

But the prison has an alarming secret, US congressional investigators disclosed last year. They revealed evidence showing that it is a Chinese government outpost in the trafficking pipeline that inundates the United States with fentanyl.

For at least eight years, the prison owned a chemical company called Yafeng, the hub of a group of Chinese firms and websites that sold fentanyl products to Americans, according to the US congressional investigation, as well as Chinese government and corporate records obtained by ProPublica.

The company’s English-language websites brazenly offered US customers dangerous drugs that are illegal in both nations. Promising to smuggle illicit chemicals past US and Mexican border defenses, Yafeng boasted to American clients that “100% of our shipments will clear customs.”

Although China tightly restricts the domestic manufacturing, sale and use of fentanyl products, the nation has been the world’s leading producer of fentanyl that enters the United States and remains the leading producer of chemical precursors with which Mexican cartels make the drug.

Overdoses on synthetic opioid drugs, most of them fentanyl related, have killed over 450,000 Americans during the past decade — more than the US deaths in the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined.

The involvement of a state-run prison is just one sign of the Chinese government’s role in fomenting the US fentanyl crisis, US investigators say. Chinese leaders have insistently denied such allegations. But US national security officials said the Yafeng case shows how China allows its chemical industry to engage openly in sales to overseas customers while blocking online domestic access and enforcing stern laws against drug dealing inside the country.

Beijing also encourages the manufacture and export of fentanyl products, including drugs outlawed in China, with generous financial incentives, according to a bipartisan inquiry last year by the House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.

“So the Chinese government pays you to send drugs to America but executes you for selling them in China,” Matt Cronin, a former federal prosecutor who led the House inquiry, said in an interview. “It’s impossible that the Chinese Communist Party doesn’t know what’s going on and can’t do anything about it.”

China’s antidrug cooperation has been persistently poor, US officials said. In 2019, Xi imposed controls that cut the export of fentanyl, but Chinese sellers shifted to shipping precursors to Mexico, where the cartels expanded their production.

“We couldn’t get the Chinese on the phone to talk about fighting child pornography, let alone fentanyl,” said Jacob Braun, who served as a senior official at the Department of Homeland Security during the Biden administration. “There was zero cooperation.”

China also remains the base of global organized crime groups that launder billions for fentanyl traffickers in the US, Mexico and Canada. ProPublica has previously reported that this underground banking system depends on Chinese elite who move fortunes abroad by acquiring drug cash from Chinese criminal brokers for Mexican cartels. Chinese banks and businesses also help hide the origin of illicit proceeds.

The regime in Beijing therefore has considerable control over key nodes in the fentanyl chain: raw materials, production, sales and money laundering.

US leaders, Democrats and Republicans alike, have accused China of using fentanyl to weaken the United States. Some veteran agents agree.

Ray Donovan, who retired in 2023 as the Drug Enforcement Administration’s chief of operations, said he believes that a “deliberate strategy” by the Chinese state has caused the trafficking onslaught “to grow in size and scope.”

“They have said for years that they are cracking down,” Donovan said in an interview. “But we haven’t seen meaningful action.”

Still, current and former US officials told ProPublica that the national security community has not found conclusive evidence of a planned, high-level campaign against Americans by the Chinese government. That is partly because for years the US treated fentanyl as a law enforcement matter rather than a national security threat, making it hard to gather intelligence about the extent and nature of the regime’s role.

“If this was Chinese intelligence doing something, we have a focus on that as counterintelligence,” said Alan Kohler, who retired from the FBI in 2023 after serving as director of the counterintelligence division. “If it was drug cartels, we have a criminal focus on that. But this area of crime and state converging falls between the seams in and among agencies.”

Nonetheless, the current and former officials said rampant fentanyl trafficking could not continue without at least the passive complicity of the world’s most powerful police state.

“I haven’t seen smoking-gun evidence that it’s a policy or strategy of the government at a high level,” Kohler said. “You could argue that their decision not to do anything about it, even after the results are clear, is tacit support.”

In a written statement, the spokesperson for China’s embassy in Washington described as “totally groundless” any allegation that the regime has fomented the crisis.

“The fentanyl issue is the US’s own problem,” said the spokesperson, Liu Pengyu. “China has given support to the US’s response to the fentanyl issue in the spirit of humanity.” At the United States’ request, he said, China in 2019 restricted “fentanyl-related substances as a class,” becoming the first country to do so, and has cooperated with the US on counternarcotics.

“The remarkable progress is there for all to see.”

The Trump administration has made the fight against fentanyl a priority and in February imposed a 25% tariff on Chinese imports to pressure Beijing for results. The approach could put a dent in the drug trade, but it’s too early to tell, officials said.

“The Chinese system responds to a negative incentive,” said former FBI agent Holden Triplett, who served as legal attache in Beijing and director of counterintelligence on the National Security Council. “China may be willing to endure more pain than we can give. But it is our only chance.”

To respond effectively, the US needs a clearer picture of the Chinese fentanyl underworld, Triplett and others say. The activities of the Shijiazhuang prison are a compelling case study, but not the only one.

To examine the role of the Chinese state in the drug trade, ProPublica interviewed more than three dozen current and former national security officials for the US and other countries, some of whom provided exclusive inside accounts. The reporting also drew on last year’s House investigation, digging into significant findings that have received little public attention, plus court files, government documents, academic studies, private inquiries and public records in the US, China and Mexico.

Prison business

In 2010, the Hebei Prison Administration Bureau combined three detention facilities to create a high-security prison in Shijiazhuang, the capital of Hebei province. The region is a base of China’s chemical industry, which is the largest in the world. It is also weakly regulated and freewheeling, according to US national security officials, private studies and other sources. Companies peddle everything from innocuous fertilizers to deadly opioids.

Liu Jianhua, a veteran Chinese Communist Party official with a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Illinois Chicago, became director of the prison in 2014. By then, fentanyl was cutting a swath across America. Overdose deaths soared due to the ease with which US users and dealers could acquire fentanyl products by mail from China.

China’s high-tech surveillance apparatus aggressively polices the online activities of its citizens. Yet sales of fentanyl to foreigners have thrived on popular, easily accessible websites, said Frank Montoya Jr., a former FBI agent with years of China-related experience who served as a top U.S. counterintelligence official.

“You don’t have to go on the dark web,” Montoya said. “It is out in the open.”

Yafeng Biological Technology Co. Ltd., also known as Hebei Shijiazhuang Yafeng Chemical Plant, became a typical player on this frontier, the congressional inquiry found. (As part of its reporting, ProPublica mapped links between the prison, the company and the US drug market with the help of two entities that specialize in China open-source research: Sayari, a company that provides risk management and supply-chain analysis and that supported the House inquiry, and C4ADS, a nonprofit that investigates illicit global networks.)

Yafeng’s websites and Chinese corporate records describe the firm as a chemical manufacturer. It has ties through other websites, phone numbers and email addresses to at least nine companies that advertised illicit drugs, causing investigators to conclude that Yafeng was a network hub, according to the report and interviews. It’s common for interconnected Chinese fentanyl producers and brokers to obscure details about their enterprises and change names and platforms to elude detection, US officials said.

In some ways, Yafeng presented itself to foreign buyers as a respectable company. The English-language websites featured peppy phrases like “team spirit” and “promoting the well-being of community.” The China-based sales representatives gave themselves Western names: Diana, Monica, Jessica. A map of markets showed shipping routes from China to the United States, Mexico, Canada and other countries.

Yet the sales pitches left little doubt that the firm knew its activities were illegal. Yafeng websites utilized familiar terms assuring US and Mexican drug users and traffickers of the company’s skill at smuggling illegal narcotics overseas, according to the House report and US investigators.

The company touted its use of “hidden food bags,” a method in which drugs are concealed in shipments labeled as food products. Ads promised “strong safety delivery to Mexico, USA” with “packaging made to measure” to “guarantee” that illicit chemicals would elude border inspections, documents show.

Chinese traffickers often discuss lawbreaking in such brazen terms with foreign customers, seemingly unconcerned about China’s omnipresent surveillance system, court files and interviews show.

Another firm, Hubei Amarvel Biotech, explicitly explained to US and Mexican clients online — complete with photos — its methods for “100% stealth shipping” of drugs disguised as nuts, dog food and motor oil, court documents say. After undercover DEA agents lured two Amarvel executives to Fiji and arrested them, a New York jury convicted them in February on charges of importation of fentanyl precursors and money laundering. (One defendant, Yiyi Chen, has filed a motion requesting an acquittal or retrial.)

At the time of the arrests, the Chinese government issued a statement condemning the US prosecution as “a typical example of arbitrary detention and unilateral sanctions.”

Similarly, Yafeng websites displayed photos of narcotics in plastic baggies to peddle a long list of chemicals, including fentanyl precursors and U-47700, a powerful fentanyl analogue outlawed in both the US and China that has no medical use, the House report says.

One victim of U-47700 was Garrett Holman of Lynchburg, Virginia. Holman had fallen in with youths who discovered how easy it was to buy synthetic drugs online. In late 2016, Holman overdosed on U-47700, street name “pinky,” that arrived by mail from southern China. His father, Don, performed CPR before paramedics rushed Holman to the hospital. Although he survived, another overdose killed him just days before his 21st birthday in February 2017.

“My son’s opioid exposure was less than two months,” Don Holman told a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee the next year. “At 20 years old, I do not believe my son deserved to die for his initial bad choices.”

The father handed over evidence, including the envelope in which the drugs arrived, to federal agents, who traced about 20 shipments back to the same sender in China, he said in an interview. Don Holman blames the fentanyl crisis on the American appetite for opioids as well as the Chinese government. He has spent eight years telling anyone he can, from drug czars to fellow parents, about the experience that shattered his family.

“I’ve had to hit parents right between the eyes, like: ‘Hey, your child is not going to be here if you don’t do something,” he said. “You need to wake up.’”

No link to Yafeng surfaced in that case. The firm’s sales of U-47700 and other illicit drugs occurred during a period when its sole owner and controlling shareholder was the Shijiazhuang prison, according to the House inquiry, Sayari and C4ADS.

One of Yafeng’s street addresses was that of the prison, ProPublica determined through satellite photos and public records. Another Yafeng address next door also houses the offices of a clothing firm owned by the provincial prison administration. A third Yafeng address a few blocks away is a former municipal police station, records and photos show.

The director of the prison, Liu Jianhua, left his post after becoming the target of a corruption inquiry in 2021, according to Chinese media reports. It’s unknown how that investigation was resolved or if his fall had anything to do with the drug activity. Liu could not be reached for comment. The prison administration did not respond to requests for comment.

Yafeng stopped doing business under that name at some point between 2018 and 2022, records show. Yet the Yafeng group continued to function through at least one of its affiliated websites, protonitazene.com, the congressional report said. As of last year, the site was still advertising “hot sale to Mexico” of drugs including nitazenes, which are 25 times more powerful than fentanyl.

Government incentives

Yafeng is not the only company with connections to the Chinese state and fentanyl.

Gaosheng Biotechnology in Shanghai is “wholly state-owned,” congressional investigators found. The company sold fentanyl precursors and other narcotics — some illegal in China — on 98 websites to US, Mexican and European customers, the report says. Senior provincial development officials visited Gaosheng and praised its benefits for the regional economy. Gaosheng did not respond to requests for comment.

The Chinese government owned a stake in Zhejiang Netsun, a private firm that had a Chinese Communist Party member serving on its board of directors as a deputy general manager, the congressional report says. Netsun carried out over 400 sales of illegal narcotics, the report says, and served as a billing or technical contact for over 100 similar companies — including Yafeng. Netsun did not respond to requests for comment.

And the Shanghai government gave monetary awards and export credits to Shanghai Ruizheng Chemical Technology Co., a “notorious seller of fentanyl products, which it advertises widely and openly on Chinese websites like Alibaba,” the report says. Chinese officials invited company reps to roundtable discussions about technology and business. Shanghai Ruizheng did not respond to requests for comment.

Chinese government officials who interact with the trafficking underworld are often prominent in provincial governments, where corruption is widespread, said a former senior DEA official, Donald Im, who led investigations focused on China. Not only can they make money through kickbacks or investments, but they benefit politically, rising in the Communist Party hierarchy if their local chemical industries prosper.

“Key government officials know about the fentanyl trade and they let it happen,” Im said.

China’s central government also plays a vital role by providing systemic financial incentives that fuel fentanyl trafficking to the Americas, US officials say. The House inquiry discovered a national Value-Added Tax rebate program that has spurred exports of at least 17 illegal narcotics with no legitimate purpose. They include a fentanyl product that is “up to 6,000 times stronger than morphine,” the House report says.

This state subsidy program has pumped billions of dollars into the export of fentanyl products, including ones outlawed in China, according to the report and US officials. The tax rebate is 13%, the highest available rate. To qualify, companies have to document the names and quantities of chemicals and other details of transactions, the report says.

The existence of this paper trail refutes a frequent claim by Chinese leaders: that weak regulation of the chemical sector makes it impossible to identify and punish suspects.

Chinese officials did not respond to specific questions about the government financial incentives or the state-connected companies involved in drug trafficking. But the embassy spokesperson said China has targeted online sellers with a “national internet cleanup campaign.”

During that crackdown, Liu Pengyu said, Chinese authorities have cleaned “14 online platforms, canceled over 330 company accounts, shut down over 1,000 online shops, removed over 152,000 online advertisements, and closed 10 botnet websites.” He said Chinese law enforcement has determined that many illegal ads appear on foreign online platforms.

Wall of resistance

In May 2018, Cronin — then a federal prosecutor based in Cleveland — went to Beijing in pursuit of one of the biggest targets in the grim history of the fentanyl crisis: the Zheng drug trafficking organization, an international empire accused of trafficking in 37 US states.

Cronin and his team of agents hoped to persuade Chinese authorities to prosecute Guanghua and Fujing Zheng, a father and son who were the top suspects. They ran into a wall of resistance.

In an interview, Cronin recalled walking into a cavernous room in China’s Ministry of Public Security where a row of senior officials and uniformed police waited at a long table. A curtain-sized Chinese flag covered a wall.

Cronin took a breath, opened a stack of binders he had lugged from Cleveland and presented his case. The prosecutor laid out evidence connecting the Zhengs, who were chemical company executives based in Shanghai, to two overdoses in Ohio. The US distribution hub was a warehouse near Boston run by a Chinese chemist, Bin Wang. Later, Wang said he simultaneously worked for the Chinese government “tracking chemicals produced in China” and traveled home monthly from Boston “to consult with Chinese officials,” a memo by his lawyer said.

The response of the Chinese counterdrug chiefs was a brush-off, Cronin recalled in the interview. Essentially, he said, they told him: “You are right that the Zhengs are exporting these drugs that are killing Americans. But unfortunately, technically what they are doing is not a violation of Chinese law.”

Cronin pulled out another binder. He went over evidence and an expert analysis showing that the Zhengs had committed Chinese felonies, including money laundering, manufacturing of counterfeit drugs and mislabeling of packages.

Tensions rose when the Chinese officials responded that, unfortunately, the police unit that handled such offenses was not available; they rebuffed Cronin’s offer to delay his return flight in order to meet with that unit, he said.

After the US Justice Department charged the Zhengs that August with a drug trafficking conspiracy resulting in death, a Chinese newspaper reported that a Chinese senior counterdrug official criticized the case. The US “failed to provide China any evidence to prove Zheng violated Chinese law,” the official said.

Later, the US Treasury Department sanctioned the Zhengs and designated the son as a drug kingpin. US investigators told ProPublica they concluded that the Zhengs operated with the blessing of the Chinese government, citing the defendants’ sheer volume of business, high-profile online activity and open communications on WeChat, the Chinese messaging platform that authorities heavily monitor.

Ohio courts granted millions of dollars in civil damages to the family of Thomas Rauh, a 37-year-old who died of an overdose in Akron in 2015. The family never received any money, however.

Rauh’s father, James, who traveled and did business in China in his youth, has become an antidrug activist. He said the US government must do more to crack down on China’s role and counter public stigma that still blames addicts.

“I don’t think the US government wants to take the responsibility for confronting this,” he said.

A decade of frustration has compelled James Rauh to call for a drastic solution. He wants the US to designate fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction in response to what he sees as an intentional Chinese campaign.

“It’s asymmetric warfare,” he said.

Wang pleaded guilty and served prison time. The Zhengs, however, remain free in China and have never responded to the allegations in court. During a brief encounter with a “60 Minutes” journalist in Shanghai in 2019, Guanghua Zheng denied he was still selling fentanyl in the United States and said the Chinese government “has nothing to do with it.”

The Zheng case is typical, said Im, the former senior DEA official. Thousands of DEA leads relayed to Chinese counterparts over the years have been “met with silence,” he said. In other cases, Chinese officials have asked for more details about the targets of US investigations — and then warned suspects linked to the Communist Party, Im said.

Most US national security officials interviewed for this story described similar experiences, citing a few exceptions, such as a joint US-Chinese operation in Hebei province in 2019.

A former DEA agent, William Kinghorn, recalled the dispiriting aftermath of an investigation he oversaw centered on Chuen Fat Yip, whose firms allegedly distributed more than $280 million worth of drugs. Yip has denied wrongdoing and denounced US criminal charges and sanctions. He is on the DEA’s 10 most wanted fugitives list and remains free in China, US officials said.

“We obtained information that the Chinese authorities did ban or shut down the companies” the DEA targeted in the case, Kinghorn said in an interview. “We learned that afterward these same people [linked to Yip] were now owning or managing similar companies. Even though they had been banned, they basically just changed the name of the company.”

A sense of impunity persists in the chemical industry, according to a 2023 inquiry by Elliptic, a UK analytics firm. It reported that many of the 90 Chinese companies contacted by its undercover researchers were “willing to supply fentanyl itself, despite this being banned in China since 2019.”

The final year of the Biden administration brought signs of modest progress in China, including new regulations, shutdowns of firms, and arrests of a suspected money launderer and four senior chemical company employees charged by US prosecutors.

Citing those cases from 2024, spokesperson Liu Pengyu said China has “collaborated closely” with the US, adding, “Multiple major cases are making great progress.”

Meanwhile, US overdose deaths fell by 33% compared with the previous year, according to the annual threat assessment by the US intelligence community released March 25. The drop may be tied to the increased availability of naloxone, a drug for treating overdoses, the report said.

The threat assessment report warned that “China likely will struggle to sufficiently constrain” companies and criminal groups involved in the US fentanyl trade, “absent greater law enforcement actions.”

Cronin, the former federal prosecutor, went on to become chief investigative counsel for the House Select Committee. He led last year’s inquiry into China’s role in the fentanyl crisis. The committee’s review of seven Chinese company websites found over 31,000 instances of firms offering illegal chemicals during a period of about three months in early 2024.

Undercover communications with the firms “revealed an eagerness to engage in clearly illicit drug sales,” the report says, “with no fear of reprisal.”

Kirsten Berg contributed research. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Continue Reading

Complaints target ‘zero dollar’ steel factory

Content inspection by the House Committee in Rayong

In response to allegations of illegal operations and concerns about economic compliance, the House committee on national protection and border affairs will check a Rayong steel factory in early next month.

A task force headed by Industry Minister Akanat Promphan will join the committee chair and main opposition People’s Party ( PP ) MP for Rayong, Chutipong Pipobpinyo, who is also the chairman of the committee and the main opposition People’s Party ( PP ) MP for Rayong.

He stated that the organized visit is to investigate information that the Xin Ke Yuan Steel Company’s Pluak Daeng district’s following factory had been constructed despite a suspension order.

Since the State Audit Office ( SAO ) building in Bangkok’s Chatuchak district collapsed in the March 28 earthquake, Xin Ke Yuan Steel Co has been subject to investigation.

ITD-CREC, a cooperative venture between China Railway No. 216 and SET-listed Italian-Thai Development Plc, was constructing the building. For the SAO building job, 10 Thailand Co. and Xin Ke Yuan Steel Co. sourced the material.

The Chinese company even attracted attention in December of last year when its Rayong stock was shut down as a result of an accident involving a fuel tank leak.

Mr. Akanat met with the council on Thursday to explain efforts to end Thailand’s “zero-dollar business,” a term used to describe job that generates no money and worth for the country.

According to the business minister, foreign companies may be granted investment privileges if they are found to have broken the laws, the PP MP said, adding that the procedure to withdraw them may be suggested by a government involved.

The Industry Ministry will, for instance, propose to the Board of Investment ( BoI ) that the Board of Investment ( BoI ) be given the right to terminate investment privileges in the event of non-compliance with industrial standards.

Mr. Chutipong claimed that BoI representatives informed the screen that the organization conducts inspections of foreign companies with investment privileges, but they did not specify how often these inspections are carried out.

The large number of Chinese technicians employed by these companies as part of the purchase privilege scheme, which may not be in line with the goals of a policy that was intended to promote employment opportunities for Thais, was also noted by the PP MP.

He claimed that Xin Ke Yuan Steel Co employs 9.4 % of its labor, with the remainder being migrant workers.

What benefit does Rayong Province receive from granting these businesses purchase protections? What benefit does it have if Thai citizens aren’t employed? he inquired.

Mr. Chutipong stated that the council would follow up on the issue of Thai personnel being employed by businesses that have BoI privileges.

Continue Reading

SM Lee receives top May Day award from NTUC for ‘supreme’ contributions to labour movement

At the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) ceremony held on May Day, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong was presented with the&nbsp, Distinguished Comrade of Labour Award on Friday ( Apr 25 ).

In a press release, NTUC stated that this major prize is” conferred on individuals who have made exceptional and significant efforts to the labor action.”

SM Lee worked diligently to reinforce the tripartite relationship between NTUC and its unions, employees, businesses, and the government over the course of many years of dedicated public services.

This made it possible for Singapore to climate economic downturns, safeguard work, and offer staff opportunities. Under his leadership, the pleasant labor-management environment that he fostered contributed to the growth of Singapore’s business and consistently improved the lives of its employees, NTUC continued.

The May Day Awards, which were held this year at the&nbsp, Marina Bay Sands Expo and Convention Center, honored a document 180 recipients since its founding in 1963, according to NTUC.

For their unwavering commitment and concern for protecting workers ‘ interests as well as for having a significant influence on the labor movement, they were given the honor of recognition of remarkable union leaders, tripartite partners, staff, and organizations.

In honor of Mr. Lee, NTUC applauded him and his team for “working tirelessly” to advance the country’s economy and prosperity through crises like the 1985 crisis, the Asian financial crisis, the global financial crisis, and the COVID-19 epidemic, which then enabled the country to emerge stronger from each problems.

Additionally, it was noted that Mr. Lee was in charge of important workplace activities that supported ongoing education and training, including the launch of the Skills Redevelopment Programme in 2008, which laid the groundwork for the SkillsFuture program today.

Mr. Lee even supported and introduced fundamental strategies like the Workfare Income Supplement and the Progressive Wage Model, which aid lower-wage workers and enhance their employment prospects.

Under his management, the National Wages Council’s annual comments continued to include wage increases for lower-income employees, according to NTUC.

In other industries, Mr. Lee’s initiatives for workplace change included:

  • The Employment and Employability Institute, a company that offers job-matching, job advice, and skills-upgrading services to employees.
  • The Job Security Council, which supports displaced employees ‘ job-matching and location.
  • The Company Training Committee program that promotes employee transformation and advancement.

Major changes in work safety and health standards were achieved under his command, reducing workplace injury levels and improving working conditions, NTUC added.

Continue Reading

China’s top graft-buster warns ‘no one is untouchable’ in corruption fight

China’s top graft-buster on Thursday said it would continue to turn up the heat on corruption as part of broader efforts to create a better business environment, warning that “no one is untouchable”.

Two weeks after it announced that the number of officers facing disciplinary action was off more than 50 % in the first quarter compared to the same period last year, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection made its comment.

The CCDI made the remarks in a remark for China Discipline Inspection and Supervision News, its country’s formal paper.

Do you have inquiries about the most popular issues and trends from different parts of the world? With our award-winning team’s innovative platform of customized content, SCMP Knowledge, you can find answers to all your questions, answers, FAQs, analyses, and infographics.

“The thinking that the anti-corruption campaign will affect economic development and dampen cadres’ enthusiasm is wrong and harmful,” the commentary said, pushing back against voices that have called for an easing in the campaign so that officials have more room for economy-boosting policies.

According to the statement,” Problem is the greatest injustice, and fairness and justice are critical problems for the healthier development of the economy and world,” it said.

” Resolutely eradicating fraud is a powerful strategy to maintain and advance social justice and justice, as well as to create a market-oriented, law-based, and internationalized business culture.”

The remark also made it clear that the fight against corruption in China was still “grim and complex” and that it was difficult and laborious to eradicate the conditions that cause fraud.

However, it vowed to do any circumstance of corruption regardless of who would be a part of the investigation.

“Now in China, no one is untouchable. There is no ‘golden seal of immunity’, no ‘iron-hat prince’, no so-called safe zones, and no forbidden areas that cannot be investigated,” the commentary said. “This has become a common consensus of the whole party and the people.”

The CCDI on Tuesday announced the formal arrest of Li Gang, the disciplinary chief sent by the graft-buster to the party’s Central Organisation Department. Photo: Weibo/球场见626

More than 185, 000 officers were disciplined in the first three months of this year, according to the CCDI on Tuesday, a 53 % increase over the same time in 2024.

Additionally, more officers were being investigated. A full of 220, 000 anti-corruption investigations were launched in the third, according to the CCDI, which is up almost 50 % from the same period last year.

The precise information once more sends a clear message that the fight against problem won’t end and that we won’t give a damn penny, the remark said.

14 municipal and ministerial-level officers were subject to disciplinary action in the first quarter, two more than the exact period last year, at the top of the order.

However, the rank and file account for the majority of the rise in cases, with roughly 24, 000 “ordinary apparatchiks” at the entrance level of Taiwanese government being punished, a 50 % increase from a year ago.

The CCDI reported that 130, 000 remote officials and employees at state-owned firms were subject to disciplinary action, which is a 60 % increase over the first quarter of 2024.

This demonstrated the intensifying efforts being made to eradicate bribery and wrongdoing, according to a CCDI statement from Tuesday. The CCDI made a particular notice of “grass-roots problem” during its duct in January, promising to eradicate graft for the next two decades.

The Central Anti-Corruption Coordination Group ( CaC ) ordered an expansion of efforts to combat graft at the grassroots, including removing “village tyrants” and “district bullies,” which it claimed were sources of instability, in a work plan released in 2023.

After more than nine weeks of inquiries, the CCDI also made the proper arrest of Li Gang, the administrative captain sent by the graft-buster to the ruling Communist Party’s major personnel department, the Central Organisation Department.

Li, who holds a vice-ministerial name, is the highest-ranking punitive official who has been detained and subject of corruption investigation in the last two years.

South China Morning Post’s latest news:

Download our smart app for South China Morning Post to get the most recent information. Copyright 2025.

Continue Reading

Trump pushing China toward AI processor self-sufficiency – Asia Times

According to several market analysts, China’s stockpile of Nvidia H20 artificial intelligence ( AI ) processors is likely to run out in about a year given that the Trump administration has prohibited sales to Chinese customers.

Huawei, a Chinese tech company, therefore, had increase production of its fresh Ascend 910C solution as quickly as possible while other Chinese AI device designers make more effort to avoid a chip shortage in the years to come.

According to several sources, Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, and another Chinese companies placed orders for H20 processors for between US$ 12 billion and US$ 16 billion, or even more, in the first quarter of this year. At least one million of the cards apparently arrived before the shipping were stopped.

An unnamed Chinese business executive told Japan’s Nikkei Asia news that the new US punishment “didn’t come as a surprise because it was commonly anticipated across the market.”

Every big Chinese tech firm had prepared H20 stocks in advance. After all, it wasn’t banned at the time, so why not, given its impressive efficiency?

The US has placed a cap on the performance of AI processors that can be exported to China for the next time, and it was then lifted after new, down-to-earth versions turned out to be bestsellers.

The Da Vinci style infrastructure, which was introduced in 2018 as a platform for AI processing and a replacement for Nvidia in data centers, cloud, edge devices, and other programs, is where Huawei’s Ascend collection of AI processors came from. The Ascend 910 computer was introduced the year before.

After the US ordered Taiwan’s TSMC to stop providing Huawei with device casting service, the Ascend 910B was released in 2022. The Nvidia A100, which was released two years earlier, is rated as performing about 20 % below the H100 if it is produced in China by SMIC using non-sanctioned 7nm DUV printing. In 2022, imports of those two Nvidia bits were halted.

Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, speech recognition provider iFLYTEK, AI application provider SenseTime, regional universities and nationwide facilities, as well as Huawei itself, officially adopt the 910B.

Within the next few weeks, large shipments of the Ascend 910C are anticipated to started. The growth was revealed final August. It is the most cutting-edge Foreign solution to Nvidia, which is already being used by China’s DeepSeek, DeepSeek.

Similar to Nvidia’s cutting-edge Blackwell computer’s structure, the 910C consists of two 910B cards connected in a single package. The 910C performs well on its own, exceeding the H20 and coming close to the H100.

The 910C, which is used in Huawei’s fresh CloudMatrix 394 rack-scale AI data center answer, a complete system that includes 384 Ascend 910C processors, servers, marketing, store, energy management, and cooling, is more impressive.

The CloudMatrix 394″ competes immediately” with Nvidia’s premium GB200 Grace Blackwell Superchip, according to scientist Dylan Patel and his SemiAnalysis colleagues.

With technology at the pedal, networking, optics, and technology layers, Huawei is a technology behind in chips, but its scale-up solution is probably a generation back of Nvidia and AMD’s current products on the market, according to them.

Huawei’s solution uses significantly more electricity than Nvidia’s, but according to the report,” the power imbalances are a relevant but not a limiting factor in China.” Although this is the best thing China can do right now under the current US sanctions, that won’t always be the case.

SemiAnalysis points out that Huawei still relies on imported Samsung for its high-bandwidth memory ( HBM ) and that its AI processors are produced using imported machinery. However, attention is also being paid to those two flaws.

Hyundai Motor Securities, a Korean stockbroker, reports that Chinese DRAM manufacturer CXMT is “targeting deployment in Huawei’s Ascend AI chips within two to three years.”

In addition, China’s semiconductor equipment and materials industry has advanced to the point where, in spite of US sanctions, SMIC and other foundries, as well as CXMT and other Chinese memory chip makers, can upgrade their process technology and increase capacity.

Naura, China’s largest producer of semiconductor production equipment, is now rated by some as being in the top ten on the global scene.

Ascend 910C yields remain low, but they are rising, indicating that SMIC’s production capacity could reach 400, 000 chips per month later this year, according to industry sources. Additionally, Huawei has already revealed that the Ascend 920, which will be made using SMIC’s 6nm process, will be 30 % to 40 % more effective than the 910C.

The US sanctions ‘ failure to enact a ban on China from using AI processors are demonstrated by the 910C production estimate and Ascend 920 specifications. As for Nvidia, if those restrictions are not lifted, it will likely see its once dominating share of the Chinese market disappear.

Follow this writer on&nbsp, X: @ScottFo83517667

Continue Reading

Former Singapore Zoo director who took over S.4 million in bribes gets 6 years’ jail, to pay similar amount in penalty

SINGAPORE: A former director at the Singapore Zoo, who accepted bribes in a scheme spanning more than a decade and involving at least eight companies, was sentenced to six years’ jail.

He was also ordered to pay a penalty of more than S$2.4 million (US$1.8 million).

Barry Chong Peng Wee, also known as Danial Chong, 58, had pleaded guilty to 19 charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and a charge of buying property using his criminal proceeds in February. 

Another 88 charges of a similar nature were taken into consideration for sentencing.

If Chong does not pay the penalty, he will have to serve 55 months and 743 days in jail, which is roughly around six years and seven months.

On Friday (Apr 25), Deputy Public Prosecutor Kelvin Chong sought a sentence of between 68 and 78 months’ jail and a penalty order of more than S$2.4 million, arguing that Chong was a “central orchestrator of the offences”. 

To this, defence lawyer Mervyn Tan said that the term imposed would be “arduous” on the 58-year-old due to his advanced age and health. He urged the court to consider a lighter sentence of 50 months’ jail.

He also urged the court to consider factors for the period that Chong was out on bail, adding that Chong has served as a caregiver for his family while his wife is the sole breadwinner. 

“He is paying a heavy price for his 11 years of folly,” the lawyer said, adding that two of Chong’s children “suffer heavily” from autism. 

Delivering the sentence, Principal District Judge Toh Han Li said he had considered that the accused was the “focal point” of the scheme and the main receiver of bribes. 

He also noted that the duration of offending was long and that significant benefit had been conferred on the accused. 

Court documents showed that the corrupt scheme lasted from July 2005 to October 2016, stopping only when the Corrupt Practices Investigations Bureau started investigations. 

By then, Chong had obtained no less than S$2,437,862 in gratification. He spent the sum on family cars, stereo systems, food expenses, a coffee machine and shopping for luxury items. 

The defence said that it intends to file an appeal against the sentence.

WHAT HAPPENED 

The corrupt scheme started around 2005. At the time of the offences, Chong was the director of facilities management at the Singapore Zoological Gardens, a subsidiary of Wildlife Reserves Singapore (WRS), which was renamed Mandai Wildlife Group in 2021. 

He managed the upkeep of the zoo premises and procurement requests for rectification works, among other duties. 

Chong had the power to approve the awarding of WRS jobs to contractors until 2013, when the job was handed over to a procurement team set up for the same purpose. The procurement team relied heavily on Chong’s recommendations. 

Sometime before 2005, Chong and two other people – Toh Siang Bee and Too Say Kiong – entered into an arrangement in which WRS’ jobs would be awarded to Shin Yong Construction in exchange for money. 

Under this arrangement, Toh would give money to Chong through Too to ensure that WRS’ jobs were awarded to Shin Yong Construction. Too passed the monies to Chong in envelopes containing cash. 

Toh Siang Bee was the founder of Shin Yong Construction, but has since died. His sons Toh Say Yong, 68, and Too, 57, were director and foreman at the company respectively. 

After Toh Siang Bee died, Toh Say Yong and Too continued the corrupt arrangement. Chong would send the specifications of each job or project to Too and tell him to bid for a specific price. 

Toh Say Yong or Too would ask other contractors to put in bids that were slightly higher to ensure that WRS would award the job to Shin Yong Construction. 

After the project or job was awarded to Shin Yong Construction, Chong would put together a handwritten list of jobs for his commission. Toh Say Yong would hand the commission amounts to Too, who then delivered the money to Chong. 

The delivery of the money by Chong would occur on a weekly basis. 

Sometime late 2013 or early 2014, Chong and Too agreed to look for other contractors to take part in the corrupt scheme. 

They roped in two sole proprietors of the companies Katana Engineering and Thiam Lee Tradings Construction, who also began handing money to Chong in envelopes. 

The scheme was eventually continued by Toh Say Yong’s son Toh Yong Soon, who began working in Shin Yong Construction between 2010 and 2011.

The son, a project manager, took over Too’s role in operations after Too was removed from Shin Yong Construction due to a dispute. 

Toh Yong Soon later roped in various companies Geoscapes, KKS Engineering, Ultron Construction, Hong Power Engineering and KK Iron Engineering, which also paid commission to Chong. 

Under this arrangement, Chong would call Toh Yong Soon regularly to inform him of upcoming projects or jobs at WRS for which the five companies and Shin Yong Construction would bid, as well as the specific prices they should bid to be awarded the projects or jobs.

Toh Yong Soon would convey this information to the other five companies.

Chong also met Toh Yong Soon at least once a month for lunch, where he would provide a list of jobs awarded to the companies and indicate the amount of commission he required. 

Acting as the middleman, Toh Yong Soon would consolidate the cash from the companies to give to Chong at least once a month. 

For their roles in the scheme, Toh Say Yong was sentenced to a year and 10 months’ jail, Toh Yong Soon to three years and three months’ jail and Too to two years and two months’ jail. 

Continue Reading

Apple aims to build most iPhones for US in India by end of 2026

By the end of the year, Apple Inc. intends to buy the majority of the iPhones it sells in the US from India, accelerating a move away from China to lessen the impact of tariffs and political conflicts.

According to people with knowledge of the situation, Apple will need to almost double its iPhone production in India while not being identified when discussing domestic plans. In the US, Apple sells more than 60 million handsets annually.

The strategy is the most recent indication that Apple and its suppliers are moving quickly to India from China, a process it started when terrible Covid lockdowns severely reduced output at its largest plant. Trump’s introduction of tariffs and Beijing-Washington tensions are causing Apple to bolster that work.

Apple in India didn’t listen to a request for comment right away. Apple’s strategy for sourcing all of its US-sold smartphones from India by 2026 was previously reported by The Financial Times. Apple’s strategy to significantly prioritize handsets from the India supply chain for its US consumers was previously covered by Bloomberg News.

In India, the Cupertino, California-based business produced US$ 22 billion ( RM$ 96.35 billion ) worth of iPhones in the 12 months that ended in March, increasing production by nearly 60 % over the prior year, according to a report released this month from Bloomberg. In South Asia, Apple currently produces one in five of its iPhones, while China continues to be its biggest producer by much.

The manufacturer in southern India where Foxconn Technology Group manufactures the majority of its smartphones is located. A key supplier is also TATA Group’s devices manufacturing division, which acquired Wistron Corp.’s local business and manages Pegatron Corp.’s operations in India.

Apple exported 1.5 trillion rupees ( RM 76.68 billion or US$ 17.5 billion ) of iPhones from the region in the fiscal year through March 2025, according to the country’s technology minister on April 8.

After Trump announced his plans for the so-called “reciprocal” levies in February, iPhone sales from India to the US grew faster. Regular India output and exports increased by Apple all through the fiscal year to March.

Electronics products, including phones and computers, were exempt from the Trump administration’s mutual taxes earlier this month. Although the break doesn’t seem to expand to Trump’s separate 20 % duty on China, which was used to force Beijing to crack down on fentanyl, that’s good news for businesses like Apple.

This also means that Indian-made smartphones didn’t currently be subject to duties. Trump’s combined taxes on China continue at 145 %, excluding the exceptions made on April 11, and this will likely force businesses like Apple to shift their supply chain.

Apple then manufactures all of its iPhone models in India, including the more pricey metal Pro models. The country’s most popular nation’s manufacturing achievement is also aided by state subsidies tied to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s plan to make the country a hub for manufacturing. &nbsp – Bloomberg

Continue Reading