Private sector crucial in the battle against climate change: ADB special advisor

Many of the world’s poorest countries are the least responsible for climate issues, but are bearing the brunt of the crisis. They are struggling to cope with natural disasters devastating infrastructure and livelihoods, and extreme temperatures affecting livestock and crops.

“Most of our developing member countries contribute virtually nothing to the climate problem. They are low emitters, per capita and national. However, they’re feeling the impacts,” he said.

“Helping them to move towards net zero is not about their commitment to low carbon but rather, energy security and better air quality in their cities.”

Where governments may have failed to act, Mr Evans is, however, optimistic about increasing interest from the private sector on investing in sustainable developments, green initiatives and climate-friendly adaptations.

“My optimism is not based on what governments are doing, but rather, based on what the private sector is doing,” he said.

“The interest of the private sector in working with us and with other multilateral development banks, to use the sovereign funding and the public sector money that we have, to help enable them to invest in climate actions, is making tremendous progress right now.” 

ASIA PACIFIC PLAYS CENTRAL ROLE

The ADB has said the battle against climate change will be won or lost in Asia Pacific.

The region is home to 60 per cent of the global population – some 4.3 billion people, and includes the world’s top two most populous countries India and China.

It has five of the 10 largest emitters in the world – China, India, Indonesia, Japan, and South Korea – and accounts for about 45 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Asia Pacific is also where 40 per cent of the world’s climate-related disasters have happened since the start of the century, with increasing frequency and intensity.

Hence, the region plays a central role in global climate efforts.

The ADB said the battle against climate change will be costly, with an estimated US$1.7 trillion needed every year to invest in infrastructure in the region.

FUNDING PLAN TO COMBAT CLIMATE CHANGE

The bank recently launched a new funding programme to support lending efforts that help the region reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build infrastructure resilient to the impact of climate change.

Known as the Innovative Finance Facility for Climate in Asia and the Pacific (IF-CAP), wealthier nations such as the United States, United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, Japan and South Korea will guarantee some loans and shoulder losses in cases of default.

The initial target is US$3 billion in guarantees. The bank believes this will help to generate five times as much – some US$15 billion – in new climate loans.

“The IF-Cap works by taking guarantees from donor countries and using that to essentially carve out part of our existing sovereign portfolio. These are existing loans that developing countries take with ADB that have sovereign guarantees. We have a very, very low risk of default for these kinds of loans,” said Mr Evans.

The plan will support projects that address mitigation with a focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and adaptation with an aim to build resilience against the impacts of climate change.

The bank said these investments could cover a wide range of sectors, such as transportation, energy, urban, and agriculture.

While the lender has made progress in multiple areas including increasing resilience to flooding, cooling efforts in cities with high temperatures, rehabilitating wetlands, promoting renewable energy including wind and solar, more needs to be done, said Mr Evans.

“We have in both the urban sector and rural sector, a number of initiatives that are paying back dividends now, in terms of building resilience. We have many success stories, but we’re not at the scale we need to be. We need to bring this all together and scale it up,” he said.

“The risks from climate impacts are severe. Every greenhouse gas emission reduced is important. Every household can play a role in that. Not so much in the poorer countries, but in the middle income countries, and in the richer countries, every household needs to play a role in reducing their carbon footprint.”

On Friday, the bank unveiled new capital reforms to boost lending by US$100 billion over the next decade as part of its continued mission to tackle climate change.

Continue Reading

Evergrande: Why should I care if China property giant collapses?

A man and children cycle past the Guangzhou FC football stadium, which is being built by Evergrande.Getty Images

A crisis at the world’s most indebted company has worsened after its chairman was placed under police surveillance.

It follows earlier reports that other current and former executives at Chinese property giant Evergrande had also been detained.

Evergrande suspended the trading of its shares in Hong Kong on Thursday until further notice.

It marks another low for the firm which was declared to be in default in 2021 after missing a crucial repayment deadline, triggering China’s current real estate market crisis.

What does Evergrande do?

Businessman Hui Ka Yan founded Evergrande, formerly known as the Hengda Group, in 1996 in Guangzhou, southern China.

According to the company’s website, Evergrande Real Estate currently owns more than 1,300 projects in more than 280 cities across China.

The broader Evergrande Group encompasses far more than just real estate development.

Its businesses range from wealth management to making electric cars and food and drink manufacturing. It even owns a controlling stake in what was one of the country’s biggest football teams, Guangzhou FC.

Mr Hui was once China’s richest person with his fortune estimated at $42.5bn (£34.8bn) by Forbes, but his wealth has plummeted since then, largely as Evergrande’s problems have grown.

Why is Evergrande in trouble?

Evergrande expanded aggressively to become one of China’s biggest companies by borrowing more than $300bn.

In 2020, Beijing brought in new rules to control the amount owed by big real estate developers.

The new measures led Evergrande to offer its properties at major discounts to ensure money was coming in to keep the business afloat.

Now it is struggling to meet the interest payments on its debts.

This uncertainty has seen Evergrande’s shares lose 99% of their value in the past three years.

In August, the firm filed for bankruptcy in New York, in a bid to protect its US assets as it worked on a multi-billion dollar deal with creditors.

Why would it matter if Evergrande collapses?

There are several reasons why Evergrande’s problems are serious.

Firstly, many people bought property from Evergrande even before building work began. They have paid deposits and could potentially lose that money if it goes bust.

There are also the companies that do business with Evergrande. Firms including construction and design firms and materials suppliers are at risk of incurring major losses, which could force them into bankruptcy.

The third is the potential impact on China’s financial system: If Evergrande collapses, banks and other lenders may be forced to lend less.

This could lead to what is known as a credit crunch, when companies struggle to borrow money at affordable rates.

A credit crunch would be very bad news for the world’s second largest economy, because companies that can’t borrow find it difficult to grow, and in some cases are unable to continue operating.

This may also unnerve foreign investors, who could see China as a less attractive place to put their money.

Is Evergrande ‘too big to fail’?

The very serious potential fallout of such a heavily indebted company collapsing has led some analysts to suggest that Beijing may step in to rescue the company.

However, Jackson Chan from financial markets research platform Bondsupermart does not think that will now happen.

“To be honest, Evergrande has already collapsed,” says Mr Chan, adding that he believes “it is on the brink of a forced liquidation”.

This could have a major effect on China’s economy as the property sector contributes roughly a quarter of its growth.

Mr Chan also suggests that the country could be following a similar path to Japan in the 1980s, when it slipped into decades of economic stagnation.

However, others think it is unlikely that Evergrande will be allowed to completely collapse.

“That could spiral, affecting other indebted companies and further hurt the overall property sector which is very important to the growth of the economy,” Dexter Roberts, director of China affairs at the Mansfield Center at the University of Montana, told the BBC.

“At the same time, many people whose household wealth is mainly in their apartments will also be badly hurt,” he added.

Mr Roberts, who spent more than two decades in China as a journalist, said “the old Evergrande no longer exists” and while the authorities may keep it afloat, “it will be as a radically diminished company.”

Reporting by Peter Hoskins and Mariko Oi

Continue Reading

EU rethinking China business ties, state by state

Western nations and multinational corporations, severely impacted by Covid-19 restrictions and supply chain disruptions, are reevaluating their approaches toward China. While many Western businesses view China as a vital market, there is considerable uncertainty about the Chinese economy’s potential recovery.

Amid the backdrop of uncertain economic trends in China and globally, the interactions between the world’s two largest economies, China and the United States, hold significance. Relations are continuing to deteriorate. Chinese President Xi Jinping even accused the United States of trying to hinder China’s technological advances in March 2023.

Geopolitical tensions also exist, particularly over the Taiwan issue. While a military resolution to the matter remains largely hypothetical, the dynamics within the business community demonstrate that political tensions tend to take a backseat to economic considerations.

Since China lifted its restrictive Covid-19 measures in late 2022, it has reopened to foreign visitors and businesspeople. But despite political criticism of Beijing’s assertive stance in the South China Sea and Taiwan, Western businesses recognize the Chinese market’s importance to their companies or personal wealth accumulation. 

If they ever need to take definitive actions, they would prefer to “de-risk” rather than completely sever ties with China.

The CEOs of prominent US companies such as Apple, Pfizer and BHP attended the China Development Forum in Beijing in April 2023. Elon Musk, Tesla founder and currently the wealthiest individual on Earth, visited China two months later. 

China is Tesla’s second-largest sales market after the United States, accounting for around one-quarter of total revenue. In June, Microsoft CEO Bill Gates held a meeting with Xi in Beijing, during which the Chinese leader referred to Gates as the first “American friend” he has encountered in recent times.

One of Xi’s few American friends these days. Image: Twitter

Poor economic data indicates that even Chinese consumers harbor doubts about the future trajectory of China’s economic development. Statistics reveal challenges in the real estate sector, traditionally a key driver of China’s GDP. 

Despite recent efforts by Chinese banks, such as slashing interest rates to stimulate consumption and investment, the outlook for the Chinese economy remains lackluster.

As the Washington–Beijing relationship deteriorates, European Union member states are adopting divergent strategies in their interactions with China. These strategies are influenced by multiple drivers, including each nation’s economic interests, historical experiences with authoritarian regimes during the Cold War, and values such as freedom and democracy.

For example, Lithuania adopts a distinct and principled policy towards China. Lithuania actively champions the fundamental values and democratic principles of the European Union. 

It openly cultivates political relations with Taiwan and does not shy away from critiquing human rights violations in authoritarian regimes. After Lithuania agreed to exchange diplomatic offices with Taiwan, China effectively imposed an unofficial blockade against Lithuanian imports.

France – the second-largest economy in the European Union – adopts a more prudent approach when it comes to engaging with China. During French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to China in April, he led a delegation of business leaders to forge new agreements. While this does not imply indifference to human rights issues, France recognizes the crucial significance of its business ties with China.

There is also a divergence in political approaches towards China within individual countries. In Germany, there is a faction characterized by a “business first” approach, exemplified by individuals as well as German manufacturers with business operations in China.

On the other side, there is a cohort of EU advocates who closely align themselves with the US stance on China, including the German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock. 

This group advocates for reduced reliance on Chinese exports, intensified scrutiny of Chinese investments within the European Union and more stringent regulations on outbound investments into China. The Netherlands’ ban on exports of ASML chipmaking machines to China in June 2023 is in line with this policy.

Many European officials are increasingly aligning with US views on China while safeguarding their economic interests. For example, the Italian government has indicated its intention to pull out of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. 

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is pushing for export controls on sensitive technologies. Hungary and Poland are both stepping up their economic cooperation with China. For the seventh consecutive year, China is Germany’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching US$322 billion in 2022.

As its overall trade deficit with China rises to unprecedented levels, the European Union is becoming more pragmatic about future economic cooperation with China. This leads to the de-emphasizing of China for many multinational companies and calls for “decoupling.”

Germany’s latest China strategy affirms the pressing need to establish effective frameworks for future engagements with Beijing.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock sees China through an American lens. Image: Twitter / Screengrab

Despite undeniable evidence of worsening relations between the United States and China, Western businesses continue to maintain ties with China. But even within the European Union, member states have varying approaches when it comes to dealing with China. 

While at the EU level, China is perceived as a competitor, at the national level, each country possesses a unique set of business interests related to China, which shape their official policies.

Striking a balance between accommodating these interests and upholding EU approaches is an arduous task for every country.

Marian Seliga is head of China Desk and advisor to the board at J&T Banka, Czech Republic.

This article was originally published by East Asia Forum and is republished under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

What China’s economic problems mean for the world

Tourists visit the Nanjing Road Walkway in the rain in Shanghai, China, September 14, 2023.Getty Images

There is a saying that when the United States sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold. But what happens when China is unwell?

The world’s second-largest economy, home to more than 1.4 billion people, is facing a host of problems – including slow growth, high youth unemployment and a property market in disarray.

While these issues add up to a major headache for Beijing, how much does it matter to the rest of the world?

Analysts believe worries of an impending global catastrophe are overstated. But multinational corporations, their workers and even people with no direct links to China are likely to feel at least some of the effects. Ultimately, it depends on who you are.

Winners and losers

“If Chinese people start cutting back on eating out for lunch, for example, does that affect the global economy?” asked Deborah Elms, executive director of the Asian Trade Centre in Singapore.

“The answer is not as much as you might imagine, but it certainly does hit firms who directly rely on domestic Chinese consumption.”

Hundreds of big global companies such as Apple, Volkswagen and Burberry get a lot of their revenue from China’s vast consumer market and will be hit by households spending less. The knock-on effects will then be felt by the thousands of suppliers and workers around the world who rely on these companies.

When you consider that China is responsible for more than a third of the growth seen in the world, any kind of deceleration will be felt beyond its borders.

The US credit rating agency Fitch said last month that China’s slowdown was “casting a shadow over global growth prospects” and downgraded its forecast for the entire world in 2024.

However, according to some economists, the idea that China is the engine of global prosperity has been exaggerated.

A worker works on a production line at a packaging company in Lianyungang city, East China's Jiangsu province, Sept 27, 2023

Getty Images

“Mathematically, yes, China accounts for around 40% of global growth,” says George Magnus, an economist at the University of Oxford’s China Centre.

“But who is that growth benefitting? China runs a huge trade surplus. It exports so much more than it imports, so how much China grows or doesn’t grow is really more about China than it is about the rest of the world.”

Nevertheless, China spending less on goods and services – or on housebuilding – means less demand for raw materials and commodities. In August, the country imported nearly 9% less compared to the same time last year – when it was still under zero-Covid restrictions.

“Big exporters such as Australia, Brazil and several countries in Africa will be hit hardest by this,” says Roland Rajah, director of the Indo-Pacific Development Centre at the Lowy Institute in Sydney.

Weak demand in China also means that prices there will stay low. From a Western consumer perspective, it would be a welcome way of curbing rising prices that does not involve further raising interest rates.

“This is good news for people and businesses struggling to deal with high inflation,” Mr Rajah says. So in the short-term, ordinary consumers may benefit from China’s slowdown. But there are longer term questions for people in the developing world.

Over the last 10 years, China has invested more than a trillion dollars in huge infrastructure projects known as the Belt and Road Initiative.

More than 150 countries have received Chinese money and technology to build roads, airports, seaports and bridges. According to Mr Rajah, Chinese commitment to these projects may start to suffer if economic problems persist at home.

“Now Chinese firms and banks won’t have the same financial largesse to splash around overseas,” he says.

China in the world

While reduced Chinese investment abroad is a possibility, it is unclear how else China’s domestic economic situation will affect its foreign policy.

A more vulnerable China, some argue, may seek to repair damaged relations with the US. American trade restrictions have partly contributed to a 25% drop in Chinese exports to the US in the first half of this year, while US Trade Secretary Gina Raimondo recently called the country “uninvestable” for some American firms.

But there is no evidence to suggest China’s approach is softening. Beijing continues to retaliate with restrictions of its own, frequently blasts the “Cold War mentality” of western countries and appears to maintain good relations with authoritarian leaders of sanctioned regimes, such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Syria’s Bashar Al-Assad.

At the same time, a stream of US and EU officials continue to travel to China every month to keep up talks on bilateral trade. The truth is that few people really know what lies between Chinese rhetoric and Chinese policy.

One of the more extreme readings of this uncertainty comes from hawkish observers in Washington, who say a downturn in the Chinese economy could impact how it deals with Taiwan, the self-governing island that Beijing claims as its own territory.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken (L) shakes hands with China's President Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on June 19, 2023.

Getty Images

Speaking earlier this month, Republican Congressman Mike Gallagher – chair of the US House Select Committee on China – said problems at home were making China’s leader Xi Jinping “less predictable” and could lead him to “do something very stupid” with regards to Taiwan.

The idea is that if, as Mr Rajah argues, it becomes apparent that China’s “economic miracle is over”, then the Communist Party’s reaction “could prove very consequential indeed”.

There are, however, plenty of people who dismiss this notion, including US President Joe Biden. When asked about this possibility, he said Mr Xi currently had his “hands full” dealing with the country’s economic problems.

“I don’t think it’s going to cause China to invade Taiwan – matter of fact the opposite. China probably doesn’t have the same capacity as it had before,” Mr Biden said.

Expect the unexpected

However, if there is one lesson to learn from history, it is to expect the unexpected. As Ms Elms points out, few people before 2008 anticipated that subprime mortgages in Las Vegas would send shockwaves through the global economy.

The echoes of 2008 have got some analysts worried about what is known as “financial contagion”. This includes the nightmare scenario of China’s property crisis leading to a full-blown collapse in the Chinese economy, triggering financial meltdown around the world.

Dozens of freighters dock for loading and unloading at the Qingdao section of the Shandong Pilot Free Trade Zone in Qingdao, Shandong province, China, Sept 27, 2023.

Getty Images

Parallels with the subprime mortgage crisis – which saw the collapse of Wall Street investment giant Lehman Brothers and a global recession – are certainly tempting to make. But, according to Mr Magnus, they are not completely accurate.

“This is not going to be a Lehman-type shock,” he says. “China is unlikely to let their big banks go bust – and they have stronger balance sheets than the thousands of regional and community banks that went under in the US.”

Ms Elms agrees: “China’s property market is not linked to their financial infrastructure in the same way that American subprime mortgages were. Besides, China’s financial system is not dominant enough for there to be a direct global impact like we saw from the United States in 2008.”

“We are globally interconnected,” she says. “When you have one of the large engines of growth not functioning it affects the rest of us, and it often affects the rest of us in ways that weren’t anticipated.”

“It doesn’t mean I think we’re headed for a repeat of 2008, but the point is that what sometimes appear to be local, domestic concerns can have an effect on us all. Even in ways that we wouldn’t have imagined.”

Related Topics

Continue Reading

South India’s progressive politics vs North’s regressive politics

“You cannot expect any rational thought from a religious man. He is like a rocking log in water.” – E V Ramasamy

Erode Venkatappa Ramasamy, revered by his followers as Periyar, was an Indian social activist and politician who started the Self-Respect Movement. He is known as the “Father of the Dravidian movement.”  

Dravidianism or Dravidian nationalism is based on the idea that people living in the southern part of India are racially and culturally different from the North Indian (Indo-Aryan). Periyar claimed that Brahmins of the south were originally Aryan migrants from Northern India, who spoke Sanskrit and brought caste system to South India.

Periyar promoted Dravidian nationalism, which was based on the principle of rationalism, dismantling Brahmin hegemony by abolition of the caste system and revitalization of Dravidian languages.

He rebelled against Brahminical dominance by preaching to people that the Brahmins had monopolized and cheated other communities for decades and deprived them of self-respect. Periyar also led a strong rebellion against the imposition of Hindi as a compulsory subject in Tamil Nadu schools, viewing it as an attempt to establish “North Indian imperialism.”

Periyar’s legacy of self-respect, women’s rights, and caste eradication continues to influence South Indian politics, particularly in the state of Tamil Nadu. 

On September 2, Udhayanidhi Stalin, minister of youth welfare and sports development and son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin, while speaking at a writers’ conference in Chennai, sparked a massive controversy with his remarks on Sanatana Dharma (Hindu religion).

He said Sanatana Dharma is against the idea of social justice and must be “eradicated.” He argued that the idea is inherently regressive, dividing people based on caste and gender, and is fundamentally opposed to equality and social justice. The controversial remarks drew widespread condemnation from the Bharatiya Janata Party, with the BJP terming it a “genocidal call.”

 In defense, Udhayanidhi Stalin wrote on Twitter that he never called for genocide, but opposed the principle of Santan Dharma, which divides the people in the name of caste.

He has accused BJP leaders of twisting his statements and vowed legal action.

After the remarks, Paramhans Acharya, the chief priest of the Tapaswi Chawni temple of Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, the largest North Indian state, offered the equivalent of US$1.2 million to the one who beheads Udhayanidhi Stalin over his remarks against Sanatana Dharma.

But the bigger question is why North India is becoming so sensitive or radicalized with respect to its religion. A society must be able to understand that every religion has certain flaws, which must be corrected over time.

Certainly, Periyar’s views of making a rational society rather than a religious one based on superstitions and prejudice have played a crucial role in the development of South Indian states. 

What North India can learn from South India

Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu are commonly considered South Indian states. Bangalore, the capital city of Karnataka, is known as the “Silicon Valley of India” and accounts for one-third of India’s software exports. Tamil Nadu is known for manufacturing as it alone accounts for two-thirds of exports of personal vehicles from India.

Andhra and Telangana are known for being a pharmaceutical hub, accounting for 22.5% of all pharma manufacturing facilities in India.

Kerala is famous for its tourism industry. According to 2018 official data, tourism constitutes 10% percent of Kerala’s GDP and provides about 23.5% of employment in the state.

Millions of migrant workers from the North reach the South in search of better jobs, putting an extra burden on the states. Data show that southern Indian states continue to outperform the rest of the country in health, education, and economic opportunities.

Kerala has the highest literacy rate in India. A state’s prosperity is measured on two indicators, gross state domestic product (GSDP) and per capita income. According to Wikipedia, four of the five South Indian states rank among the top 10 Indian states in terms of GSDP. Telangana, Karnataka, and Kerala make it into the top 10 states by per capita income.

Besides a strong industrial and IT base, the southern states have also been blessed with robust banking and finance infrastructure. Apart from public and private sector banks, NBFCs (non-banking financial companies) play a crucial role in lending infrastructure, a vital factor in supporting entrepreneurial spirit.

Today’s South Indian states are far better than all the other regions of India on every Human Development Index. But the bigger question is what led the South Indian states to march ahead of their North Indian counterparts. 

In South India, social revolution always preceded the political revolution. But in the North, it’s just the opposite.

North Indian electorates remain swayed by emotive, irrational appeals by following a herd mentality to vote based on caste and religion, leading to long-term dominance by one party more than a decade.

The Indian National Congress ruled across North Indian states for five decades. Such a monopoly disconnects citizens from government activity and the government takes the people for granted, which results in less development in those states compare to South.

However, South India experiences stable political competition, with alternating parties in power such as the DMK and AIADMK in Tamil Nadu, LDF and UDF in Kerala, BJP, Congress and JDS in Karnataka, Congress, YSR Congress and TDP in Andhra. This healthy competition encourages governments to perform better and promotes citizen participation and activism, unlike the North, where politics tends to overshadow governance.

This has resulted in quality of governance and better leadership, which pushed the states on the path of development and prosperity. Effective population control consistently over the decades is a testimony of their leadership.

However, statistics show that South India is not getting enough reward for such good performance from the central government. Even South Indian politicians have expressed concerns about the state of federalism in India.

North’s regressive politics pulling India down

The central government collects taxes from all states and distributes them among states based on Finance Commission recommendations, considering three criteria: needs, equity, and state performance.

Recently the 15th Finance Commission increased weightage for the population criterion to 15% from the previous 10%, which some critics in South India believe is rewarding states with high populations that haven’t controlled population growth or provided better governance. 

As a result, states like Uttar Pradesh, which have a large populations but low Human Development Index scores, receive more funding (17.9% ) than states with higher development indices like Karnataka (3.65%), Tamil Nadu (4.08%), and Kerala (1.09%). This appears to reward mis-governance, low productivity, and irrationality, raising questions about the fairness of Indian federalism.

More important, South Indian politicians are denied opportunities at the central leadership despite excellent performance in their respective states. The fact that only three cabinet ministers from South India are in the current Modi government is a testimony. 

South India seems to be the biggest loser from this financial arrangement, where South Indians work hard to contribute more to national growth, while the North gets all the rewards for mis-governance and low productivity.

More important, the question arises, how long will South India fund the mismanagement and political shambles in North India, allowing non-performing states to set the country’s agenda? Udhayanidhi Stalin’s statement reflects the frustration with the kind of politics done in North India or Delhi for which South Indians have to pay a price.

Rather than tackling the issue of governance, productivity, HDI, economic opportunity, jobs, and better infrastructure, religion has become the center of the debate for the last nine years. In the real world, one who pays the bills is likely to get most of a deal. Unless we support the principle of prosperous regions always assisting poorer ones.

Continue Reading

Magpie swooping: How polarising bird terrorises suburban Australia

A magpie swoopingGetty Images

Don’t run. Travel in groups. Carry an umbrella and wear sunglasses on the back of your head.

These are some of the ominous warnings issued in Australia each spring, as magpies and humans begin their annual turf war.

Streets and parks become a battleground, as the birds – descending from above and attacking from behind – swoop down on anything they fear poses a threat to their offspring.

High up in their nests, they rule over their kingdom with an iron claw, while on the ground, humans dust off their protective hats – traditionally a plastic ice cream container – and duck for cover.

At times drawing blood, their ambushes can cause serious injuries, and in a handful of cases, death.

But experts claim magpies are misunderstood and humans are the aggressors.

And they want you to know peace is possible.

Brainy birds

Magpies are arguably the country’s most polarising bird.

Named after their resemblance to the Eurasian magpie, to which they are not actually closely related, Australian magpies are a protected native species, and to some, a beloved national icon.

Their beautiful warble is a quintessential Australian sound and, as predators of many pests, they are vital to the country’s ecosystems.

They are also incredibly intelligent – so smart they have even been caught helping each other unscrew scientific tracking devices – and they have also been known to strike up long-term, meaningful friendships with humans.

One Sydney family even credits a rescued chick named Penguin with helping them recover from a catastrophic accident, a heart-warming tale which grabbed global headlines and has since been turned into a best-selling book and a film.

Found in droves all over the country, such is their fanbase that in one 2017 poll magpies were voted Australia’s favourite bird and massive shrines have been erected in their honour in two Australian cities.

A sculpture of a magpie eating a chip

Joss McAlpin

But there are also plenty of people who struggle to get past their divebombing antics.

The whir of flapping wings; the glint of a sharp beak in the sun; a flash of their reddish-brown eyes – all enough to strike fear in the hearts of many children and adults alike.

“I am genuinely terrified,” Tione Zylstra tells the BBC.

The 21-year-old’s local train station is vigilantly guarded by a magpie, and during breeding season it plays target practice with her head weekly.

“They’re silent killers… I’ll just see this shadow over my head getting bigger and bigger and bigger.”

“I have asthma and I would be sprinting, having an asthma attack on the train, just to get away from this magpie.

“I don’t know why it hated me, but it did… I never did anything wrong, I swear!”

Why do magpies swoop?

Australians are well accustomed to swooping birds – there’s plovers, noisy miners and even the kookaburra.

But magpies are considered the ultimate “swoopy boy” and few people are without a story.

Only a very small portion of male magpies engage in the practice though, and when they do, it’s to protect their nests during breeding season, from August to November.

Experts say they do not swoop unprovoked.

But they also say magpies can interpret simple gestures like running through their territory as a slight, and not only can they recognise individual faces – they tend to hold a grudge.

“Let’s say you’ve shown some kind of response by waving your arms or trying to hit the bird away from you,” says animal behaviourist and Emiritus Professor Gisela Kaplan, who literally wrote the book on magpies.

“That act is a declaration of open war. A magpie interprets that as a sign of aggression and will then always swoop that person from then on, every year.

“[And] somebody of a similar build, a similar height and hair colour may get mistaken in their fury, or anxiety.”

Children at a Newcastle school pictured with their magpie hats in 1984

Getty Images

They have also been known to pre-emptively target cyclists and children because they don’t trust them – cyclists because “magpies think as little of covered faces as people in banks do of [those] in balaclavas”, and children because they are “less reasonable and may be a greater risk”, Prof Kaplan says.

For most people who are hit by magpies, it is a cut or scratch.

But they have been known to blind some – in the last fortnight a cyclist made the news after revealing a serial dive-bomber had left him needing major surgery and a prosthetic eye lens.

“This bird turned around and went straight for the eye, did a backflip and hit me right in the eye again,” Christiaan Nyssen said.

And in 2021, a baby was killed when her mother fell during her efforts to dodge a magpie – a case that horrified the country.

Two years earlier an elderly man died of head injuries after crashing his bicycle while fleeing an attacking magpie, and in 2010 a 12-year-old boy was hit and killed by a car in similar circumstances.

Serious injuries and deaths are rare though. What is far more common is human aggression towards the birds.

In May a Victorian man was fined after killing four magpies and injuring another two so seriously they were euthanised. And almost every year, wildlife officers report finding birds pierced with arrows, shot with guns, set on fire, shackled with chains, poisoned, or mutilated.

‘Problem’ birds are also sometimes killed by authorities, and in 2021 one Sydney council conducted a general cull of the birds after a spate of incidents.

How to make peace

A magpie warning sign in Brisbane

Brisbane City Council

Animal behaviourists say the magpie is misunderstood, and there’s no need for them to be harmed. It is our fear and response to them that is dangerous.

Yes, there are a very small number of “rogue” birds which have become aggressive – radicalised by interactions with humans – says Prof Kaplan. They should be “dealt with firmly”.

But the vast majority of magpies are reasonable creatures, she insists.

The best thing to do is avoid them. Authorities often erect signs, warning of magpies in the area, and some states have even launched apps designed to track sightings of nests.

If you are swooped, don’t run, or fight back, experts advise. If you’re on a bike, get off it. Stay calm and walk quickly through the area. Shelter under an umbrella or hold your backpack over your head.

The use of protective gear is also encouraged, like sunglasses and magpie hats.

Traditionally, they have been a plastic ice-cream containers – with eyes drawn or stuck on – or a helmet laced with zip ties. In recent years though, they’ve become more elaborate. For example, contraptions rigged up with party poppers or adorned with a fake magpie.

Sorry, we’re having trouble displaying this content.View original content on Facebook

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Facebook content may contain adverts.

But if all else fails, beg for mercy. Although authorities usually warn against feeding wild birds, Prof Kaplan suggests leaving a peace offering like a slice of bread or meat to win the magpies’ favour.

“You can make friends with magpies… they tend to be very diplomatic,” she says.

Ms Zylstra finds that prospect laughable: “Literally how… especially while they’re swooping you?”

But she agrees the birds should not be harmed and humans should learn to live in a kind of wary peace with them.

“As much as I don’t like them, they don’t deserve to die… just because they’re defending their eggs.”

Besides, magpie attacks are a character-building rite of passage, she says.

“Are you really Australian if you haven’t been swooped by a magpie?”

Related Topics

Continue Reading

Nickel nationalism working well for Indonesia

The International Monetary Fund’s June 2023 assessment of Indonesia’s export ban policy has reignited debate on Indonesia’s downstream industrial policy. 

Advocates emphasize its substantial impact on export revenues and value addition, while critics pinpoint the fiscal cost and the market distortions caused by the policy. A more nuanced assessment suggests the merits of both perspectives.

Indonesia’s experiment with downstream industrial policy began with the 2009 Mining Law signed by former president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, which mandated the domestic processing of all mineral commodities mined in the country. 

But the policy was only implemented in 2014 for nickel and bauxite amid widespread opposition from the mining sector. It was in nickel that Indonesia found its success.

Before banning nickel ore export in 2014, Indonesia predominantly exported raw nickel ore, which is minimally processed into nickel matte. The country’s nickel-related exports were a modest US$6 billion in 2013. 

By 2022, this figure had skyrocketed to nearly $30 billion, propelled by the exports of higher value-added products such as stainless steel and battery materials.

The most crucial factor to this success appears to be Indonesia’s exploitation of its “market power” in nickel production through an export ban. 

Chinese firms that were large players in the downstream nickel-based production had no choice but to expand their operations within Indonesia to secure access to its abundant nickel resources.

The rapid growth of the nickel sector was facilitated by concessional financing under the Belt and Road Initiative. Chinese state-owned banks financed the construction of coal power plants and basic infrastructure, integral components of the industrial areas that fostered economies of scale and agglomeration.

President Joko Widodo (third left) visits the PT Obsidian Stainless Steel (OSS) production line, during a series of events for the inauguration of the China-invested nickel smelter factory PT Gunbuster Nickel Industry (GNI) in Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi, in a file photo. Image: Twitter / Doc Palace / Agus Suparto

But while the export revenue gains are evident, the extent to which this revenue is retained and equitably shared within the country remains uncertain. 

This is mostly due to the capital-intensive nature of the nickel sector, the high share of foreign equity and the sector’s limited linkage with other parts of the economy beyond the primary sector.

Growth in gross domestic product may not directly translate into gross national product as export earnings by foreign investors may be entirely repatriated out of Indonesia. Yet the downstream industrial development strategy has contributed significantly to structural transformation.

Nickel-based manufactured products now stand as the third-largest export commodities behind coal and palm oil. The impact on regional economic development is also significant as the industrial areas are concentrated in eastern Indonesia, which generally lacks a large formal manufacturing sector.

A balanced evaluation necessitates weighing these benefits against the costs. Basic trade theory suggests that an export ban will depress domestic prices relative to global prices, resulting in winners and losers within the economy. 

The nickel mining sector has borne the brunt of subsidizing the downstream industries, which may affect the incentive to explore new reserves.

The fiscal costs of tax holidays and forgone royalties may also be substantial. The environmental and social costs associated with nickel processing should also be considered. Nickel smelting tends to be emission-intensive due to a reliance on coal-fired power plants. Industrial expansion has also been associated with deforestation and water pollution.

In terms of social cost, labor rights violations have been amply documented. The building of industrial areas has also been associated with the displacement of local communities traditionally dependent on agriculture and fishing.

As Indonesia contemplates extending the policy to other commodities, it is imperative to note that its nickel-based export success was highly contextual and whether comparable outcomes can be realistically expected for other commodities.

This underscores the necessity for the downstream industry development strategy to move beyond export bans and tariffs.

A nickel mine in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Image: Twitter

While harnessing market power through export restrictions has attracted investments, there is an inherent risk to this strategy due to its impact on global prices and supply. It potentially incentivizes the innovation of substitutes and provokes retaliatory trade measures from other countries.

Indonesia needs better policies to internalize the social and environmental externalities associated with nickel processing. Better enforcement of labor and environmental regulations will be key. Indonesia could also draw inspiration from certain aspects of the US Inflation Reduction Act.

While Pigouvian taxes remain the optimal way to internalize externalities, linking fiscal incentives to broader social and environmental objectives — such as reducing carbon intensity and creating quality middle-class jobs — can be another method to achieve similar goals.

Also, as natural resource advantage diminishes the more downstream a sector is, a more holistic approach that focuses on ecosystem development through the provision of key public inputs will be essential. 

Developing human capital and subsidizing public research and development will amplify positive spillovers as well as support downstream industrial growth, promoting more inclusive and shared prosperity.

Finally, increasing the share of value-add that stays in Indonesia will require financial market deepening and removing foreign direct investment barriers. These will incentivize the reinvestment of export receipts in the country.

There is reason for cautious optimism and with the implementation of better evidence-based policies, Indonesia can expand on its initial success and achieve the intended goals of its downstream industrial policy.

Faris Abdurrachman is a Master’s student in Quantitative Economics at New York University Stern School of Business and Graduate School of Arts and Science and a former Research Analyst at the Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Economic Development.

This article was originally published by East Asia Forum and is republished under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Director of 186 firms fined after one company was used to launder US.36 million in scam proceeds

SINGAPORE: A jobless man who was unable to find employment during the COVID-19 pandemic agreed to act as the director for 186 companies in exchange for payment.

One of those firms was used to launder US$2.36 million (S$3.24 million) obtained from victims who had been cheated overseas.

Er Beng Hwa, a 49-year-old Singaporean, was fined S$4,000 by a court on Wednesday (Sep 27), after pleading guilty to one count of failing to exercise reasonable diligence as a director. A second similar charge was considered in sentencing.

He was also disqualified from being a company director for three years.

The court heard that Er, also known as Adrian, had a Bachelor’s degree in business and worked various jobs to earn a living in 2020 and 2021.

Between April and June in 2020, he could not find a job because of the pandemic and was unable to pay his rent and other debts.

His previous landlord introduced him to a Chinese national named Zheng Jia.

Zheng was a chartered accountant who provided accounting and corporate secretarial services via the companies Atoms Global, Zhuoxin Global (Singapore) and Panasia Secretarial Services.

He suggested an arrangement for Er to act as a local director for companies incorporated by Atoms Global for Zheng’s clients.

Zheng said Atoms Global would conduct the necessary checks on clients and handle paperwork and checking of accounts.

Other than signing documents for company registration and opening bank accounts, Er “need not do anything”, Zheng said.

Er understood that he would be a director of the companies in name only and would not have any responsibility over the actual running of the firms.

In exchange, he would receive S$50 per year for each company that he stood as nominee director for. He would also be paid S$50 if he needed to open a bank account for the company or make any trip to sign documents.

Er did not know what work Zheng or his companies did, but agreed to the arrangement.

Under this agreement, Er was registered as local director and secretary of a Singapore company called Rui Qi Trading, incorporated in August 2020.

One of Zheng’s clients, Chinese national Hou Xiaohui, was registered as the foreign director of Rui Qi, which supposedly dealt with the wholesale of industrial, construction and related equipment.

BANK ACCOUNTS USED TO FUNNEL CHEATING PROCEEDS

Rui Qi opened two bank accounts under Hou’s name, which were used to funnel the proceeds of cheating. 

These include a sum of US$1.2 million, which Texas Capital Bank was cheated into transferring in November 2020 via a spoof email scam.

The sum went to one of Rui Qi’s bank accounts and was transferred to various accounts in China, Hong Kong, India and Indonesia.

Another scam victim was German company Gasfin Development Gmbh, which received purported emails from its supplier requesting payments.

Gasfin fell for this business impersonation scam and transferred a sum of about US$176,400 to a bank account.

Of this sum, about S$237,000 was transferred to Rui Qi’s account and dissipated to other bank accounts in China and Hong Kong.

A third victim was Abu Dhabi Ports, which received a fraudulent email presenting an invoice from Bengal Tiger Line.

The company was deceived into transferring nearly US$980,000 to Rui Qi’s account. The money was further transferred to bank accounts in Hong Kong.

Police reports were lodged in Singapore over the three cases of cheating. Investigations revealed that Hou had not entered Singapore, and that Rui Qi’s bank account was opened through exploiting local banks’ remote account opening processes.

Certain processes were allowed to be done through video-conferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

As of January 2021, Er was found to be a director of 186 companies in Singapore. He stopped acting as a director of Rui Qi in August 2021.

PROSECUTION SEEKS FINE

The prosecution sought a fine of S$3,000 to S$4,000 and for Er to be disqualified from standing as a nominee director for three years.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Vincent Ong said it is “almost impossible to exhibit greater negligence as a director” than Er was in this case, “having absolutely washed his hands clean of the affairs of the company”.

“It is only due to his ability to point to the fact that he was effectively told to do so by Zheng that prevents his conduct from crossing into the realm of gross negligence – the facts indicate that he had been assured to some degree that Zheng would handle everything other than signing documents for the company,” said Mr Ong.

Er was motivated by monetary returns for doing “essentially nothing” in exchange for payment of S$50 per company per year, and a later employment with a salary of S$1,400 per month, said Mr Ong.

“The fact that he was a director of 186 companies as at January 2021 would have generated a return of at least more than S$9,000,” he said.

For failing to exercise reasonable diligence in the discharge of his duties as director, Er could have been jailed for up to 12 months or fined up to S$5,000.

Zheng faces charges under the Companies Act and his case is pending before the courts.

Continue Reading

Evergrande seen likelier to fall as chairman probed

Worries that Evergrande Group will go bankrupt have intensified with news that the indebted property developer’s chairman, Hui Ka-yan, is under police surveillance.

Hui was taken away by Chinese police earlier this month and is being monitored at a designated location, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the situation. 

The report said the billionaire is under residential surveillance but it does not mean he will be charged with a crime. 

Now that offshore creditor meetings originally scheduled on Monday and Tuesday were canceled, Evergrande must submit a new debt revamp plan by October 30 or its bondholders’ group will support a winding-up petition already filed against the developer, Reuters reported on Tuesday. 

Shares of Evergrande have lost 42% so far this week. Shares of Country Garden and Sunac, which followed in Evergrande’s footsteps to file for bankruptcy protection in the United States, have dropped 14.3% and 20.5%, respectively.

Bankruptcy protection is a preliminary move that gives the debtor time to devise a restructuring plan and seek creditors’ approval of it. Full-out bankruptcy would mean winding up the company.

Some commentators say it’s likely not only that the once-largest property developer will go bankrupt but also that its collapse will hurt homebuyers’ confidence and create instability in the financial systems.

Since the announcement of a debt restructuring plan on March 22, sales have been worse than expected, the company said in a filing to the Hong Kong stock exchange on September 22.

Based on its current situation and consultations with its advisors and creditors, the company said, it’s necessary to re-assess the terms of the proposed restructuring plan.

Evergrande said Sunday that it is unable to meet the qualifications for the issuance of new notes under the present circumstances as its Shenzhen-listed subsidiary Hengda Real Estate Group is being probed. 

Suspicions

In fact, Hengda Real Estate had already said on August 16 that it was being investigated by the Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for suspected violation of information disclosure regulations.

It was on August 17 that Evergrande filed for bankruptcy protection to the Manhattan bankruptcy court, seeking recognition of restructuring talks underway in Hong Kong, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands.

Noting that date, Zhang Yinyin, a Shanghai-based columnist, writes in an article that when Evergrande said on August 16 that Hengda Real Estate was being probed, it already knew that its proposed debt restructuring plan would fail.

“It does not make sense to blame ‘worse-than-expected sales’ for the cancellation of the offshore creditor meeting,” Zhang says. “It would be strange if an indebted developer had strong sales.”

Zhang says that, even if its subsidiaries and executives were not being probed, it would be very difficult to restructure the debts of Evergrande – which has a liability of 2.4 trillion yuan (US$329 billion) and a need to raise another 200 to 300 billion yuan. 

Yang Shih-kuang, a Taiwanese commentator, said in a TV program on Monday that Beijing’s recent move to reduce capital outflow has also become a new obstacle for Evergrande to pay its offshore creditors and implement its debt restructuring plan. 

Yang said that, from Beijing’s perspective, indebted property developers’ top mission is to ensure the delivery of apartments to homebuyers.

Citing three sources, Reuters reported on September 11 that the PBoC is tightening its scrutiny of bulk dollar purchases by domestic firms amid a weakening renminbi. Companies now need approval from the central bank to purchase as little as US$50 million.

Last year, Evergrande delivered 300,000 apartments, about half its target, to its customers. In the first half of this year, it delivered 120,000 apartments. Media reports say the company still is obligated to deliver 400,000 more apartments to its buyers.  

Last Saturday, a social media post about Hui’s arrest went viral on the Internet. It said Hui was handcuffed as he had resisted the arrest. 

Ran Xiongfei, a veteran soccer reporter, who is believed to be familiar with the situation, said people should not trust or spread the rumor but wait for an official announcement. Some other commentators said it’s unlikely that a 64-year-old billionaire would resist an arrest.

Chen Panpan, a Beijing-based writer, says that, if Hui is going to face penalties, it will probably be due to the inability of Evergrande’s wealth management unit to repay its investors. 

“When Evergrande’s wealth management arm had overdue payments in September 2021, Hui Ka-yan made a promise that its investors would be paid,” Chen says. “But due to Evergrande’s worsening financial situation, the wealth management firm had changed its payment plans several times.”

On August 31 this year, Evergrande’s wealth management unit said it couldn’t make payments for investment products for the month due to a liquidity crunch. On September 16, the unit’s staff were detained by police in Shenzhen. The police called on the public to provide information about the case. 

A Hubei-based writer says Evergrande’s potential bankruptcy not only will hurt homebuyers’ confidence but also will cause losses to the developer’s creditors, such as banks, investors and suppliers, and shake the financial systems. He says regulators should launch effective measures to avoid a financial crisis and boost market confidence.

Read: Evergrande’s debt case hits China’s stock markets

Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

Higher for longer US rates ringing Asia alarm bells

The broadside Moody’s Investors Service just fired at the US dollar and interest rates dramatizes why the next few months could be uniquely chaotic for global markets.

It stands to reason that the one major credit rating company still holding Washington in AAA esteem is anxious to announce a downgrade.

Twelve years after S&P Global downgraded the US, Fitch Ratings last month followed suit. Fitch’s move was about more than America’s national debt careening toward US$33 trillion.

It was also a response to the “steady deterioration in standards of governance” as politicians play games with raising Washington’s statutory debt limit.

Now, Moody’s warns that the dysfunction surrounding a government shutdown on October 1, the latest manifestation of extreme polarization, may be the reason to cut Washington’s rating to Aa1.

Investors seem way ahead of credit rates as US yields move higher. Rates on 10-year Treasury bonds are at a 16-year high this week, a dubious milestone that’s slamming European and Asian markets. Benchmarks from Japan to South Korea to Australia plunged.

On Tuesday alone, MSCI’s gauge of global stocks plunged 1.24%, an outsized move for the benchmark. By Wednesday, the index was falling for a ninth day as it approaches its longest losing streak in more than a decade.

The Cboe Volatility Index, Wall Street’s so-called fear gauge, flashed its most intense warnings since May, when US inflation hit a 41-year high.

Adding to the disorientation is the dollar’s curious durability. The more investors fret about the state of global finance, the more the dollar rises. The yen’s move toward 150 to the dollar, a psychologically important level, has markets bracing for currency intervention by Japanese authorities.

The US Federal Reserve, meanwhile, is making it clear it’s not done hiking rates. When Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari on Tuesday assigned 40% odds that rates will still go “meaningfully” higher, traders figure policymakers are telegraphing more austerity to come.

Already, 11 Fed tightening moves in 18 months are working their way through global markets. The specter of more hikes could wreak havoc in debt markets, equity bourses and property sectors everywhere.

Europe is uniquely poorly positioned to withstand the coming financial storm. Rising yields will hit real estate values from Tokyo to Seoul to Bangkok.

A major challenge for Asia is figuring out which financial shoes might drop next as well as how and where the tremors will be felt.

The US government shutdown for which Republican lawmakers are agitating would furlough hundreds of thousands of federal workers and suspend vast swaths of public services, crimping US economic growth.

US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and his Republican party are angling for a government shutdown. Image: Twitter

“A shutdown would be credit negative for the US sovereign,” Moody’s analysts wrote in a note this week. They argue that “it would underscore the weakness of US institutional and governance strength relative to other AAA-rated sovereigns that we have highlighted in recent years.”

In particular, Moody’s adds, “it would demonstrate the significant constraints that intensifying political polarization put on fiscal policymaking at a time of declining fiscal strength, driven by widening fiscal deficits and deteriorating debt affordability.”

Economists at Wells Fargo write that “should a shutdown transpire, there could be a negative impact of the US dollar, albeit one that is likely to be modest and short-lived.”

Gita Gopinath, first deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund, warns of “tougher global financial conditions.” As the “fight to bring inflation back to target continues,” Gopinath says, “we expect global interest rates to remain high for quite some time,”

Furthermore, she notes, “there are reasons to think that rates may never return to the era of ‘low for long.’ This possibility is reflected in US 10-year Treasury bond yields, which have surged” to the “highest level since the global financial crisis.” In this environment, Gopinath says, “financing conditions for emerging markets can be expected to remain challenging.”

Analyst Gennadiy Goldberg at TD Securities says “overall, we view the shutdown as one of the many headwinds the economy faces this fall.” Analyst Michael Pond at Barclays tells Bloomberg that a government shutdown “will likely lead to some heightened uncertainty,” given how vulnerable Asia’s export-led economies are to “hot money” flows.

Shutdown risks are coinciding with surging oil prices and a massive strike by Detroit auto workers, both of which are exacerbating inflation risks. As such odds are Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s team will hit the monetary brakes even harder.

Count Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, among those who believe Fed rates – in the 5.25%-5.5% range now – could go significantly higher as inflation remains elevated.

“I am not sure if the world is prepared for 7%,” Dimon told the Times of India. “I ask people in business, ‘Are you prepared for something like 7%?’ The worst case is 7% with stagflation. If they are going to have lower volumes and higher rates, there will be stress in the system. We urge our clients to be prepared for that kind of stress.”

What’s more, Dimon referenced Warren Buffett’s famous observation that “only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” As Dimon notes of more assertive Fed tightening moves, “that will be the tide going out.”

“Investors,” says analyst Paul Nolte at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, “are beginning to realize that a higher for longer interest rate environment is a likely outcome and are slowly adjusting to the new normal. Higher-for-longer has been the mantra of the Fed for a few months. It is only recently that the markets have been taking them at their word.”

The irony, of course, is that the worse things get for the US fiscal outlook, the more investors flock to the dollar. That’s luring capital away from China, Japan, South Korea and other top Asian economies at the worst possible moment for Beijing, Tokyo, Seoul and beyond. Counterintuitively, big losses in US sovereign securities are increasing the dollar’s appeal.

The dollar keeps getting stronger. Photo: Asia Times Files / AFP

Even before Moody’s stumbled onto the scene, global investors faced the specter of a third straight year of losses in the $25.5 trillion Treasury debt market. All the red ink reflects investor concerns about liquidity amid the most aggressive Fed tightening cycle since the mid-1990s and extreme volatility as inflation flares up across the globe.

Yet from an interest rate differential standpoint, says Nomura Inc strategist Andrew Ticehurst, the dollar’s legacy safe-haven status, America’s steady growth and high yields make for an “unusual and powerful combination” at a moment when the potential for sudden risk-off pivots abound in markets.

Another reason this appears to fly in the face of both political and financial reality: US President Joe Biden’s dismal approval ratings. As Congressional Republicans and Democrats lock horns, Biden’s low-40s support rate leaves the White House little hope of cajoling lawmakers not to shut down the government, gamble with Washington’s credit rating or pursue reforms to increase US innovation and productivity to tame inflation.

The same goes for Biden’s latitude to protect the roughly $3.2 trillion of US Treasury securities held by top Asian authorities. Those foreign exchange reserves could find themselves in harm’s way as Moody’s joins S&P and Fitch in closing the books on America’s AAA era.

Japan would be the biggest loser with its more than $1.1 trillion of US government debt. China holds $821 billion and Korea has $116 billion. Along with losses on state savings, surging US rates could devastate Asia’s biggest trade-reliant economies, each of which is navigating their own domestic debt troubles.

In China, it’s property markets and a titanically large shadow-banking sector. In Japan, it’s the most crushing debt load in the developed world made worse by a fast-aging population. In Korea, it’s record household debt undermining broader consumption dynamics.

Here, the dollar’s trajectory – and how its rally defies gravity as bonds sell off – is adding to Asia’s headaches.

Economist Jeongmin Seong at the McKinsey Global Institute says that “many Asian countries accumulated substantial foreign exchange reserves after the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s.” In 2022, he notes, Asia accounted for 40% of global capital flows, four times the level in 2000.

“But there may be pockets of vulnerability to any sudden outflow of capital,” he explains. “In Indonesia and Vietnam, for instance, foreign direct investment accounts for 20% and 14% of total investment, respectively.”

Episodes of runaway dollar strength tend to end badly for Asia. Look no further than the region’s 1997-98 financial crisis, which was precipitated by the US Fed’s aggressive 1994-1995 rate hike cycle.

Episodes of yen volatility pose their own threat. Worries about surging Japanese government bond yields are rippling through global credit markets as the Bank of Japan hints at an exit from quantitative easing. That poses outsized risks because 24 years or zero-to-negative rates morphed Japan into the globe’s premier creditor nation.

These funds are then invested in higher-yielding assets from Brazil to South Africa to Indonesia. This giant “yen-carry trade” often explains why sharp yen moves often slam markets everywhere.

IMF economist Thomas Helbling says Asia is highly exposed on account of debt levels. “Asia’s increased borrowing in recent decades has augmented the region’s exposure to rising interest rates and heightened market volatility,” Helbling explains. “Borrowing by the region’s governments, companies, consumers and financial firms is well above levels prior to the global financial crisis.”

Trouble is, Helbling says, “highly leveraged companies face greater risk of default as monetary policies and financial conditions remain tight. Even with resilient economic growth, interest payments may exceed earnings as borrowing costs rise, reducing firms’ ability to service their debts.” Generally speaking, he adds, “corporate debt in Asia is concentrated in firms with low-interest coverage ratios.”

McKinsey economist Seong says that “some Asian economies, government, household, and corporate debt has risen by even more than the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development average.”

Seong points out that nonfinancial corporate debt in China is 150% and in Japan, South Korea and Vietnam it is more than 120%. In 2021, Korea’s household debt reached 106% and Australia’s was 119%, against an OECD average of 60%. “Carrying this amount of leverage will be costly if interest rates continue to rise,” Seong notes.

A porter walks on a bridge in Chongqing, China with new residential buildings in the background.
Photo: CNBC Screengrab / Zhang Peng / LightRocket / Getty Images

On the property side, “there’s is a risk of a fall in asset prices, including real estate,” Seong says. Between 2015 and 2021, the average nominal housing price rose by 50% in China, 34% in Australia, and 17% in South Korea. Price inflation in cities is even higher. In Seoul, for example, the price-to-rent ratio increased 2.5 times in the 2015-2021 period.

At home, Biden also must ensure the stability of banks as Fed rate hikes continue. Mohamed El-Erian, advisor at Allianz, worries higher borrowing costs may cause havoc in real estate markets. “We’ve got to be really careful,” El-Erian warns. “The housing market is central to the economy.”

At the same time, the fallout from the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March “is casting doubt on America’s ability to maintain its leadership of the global monetary system,” notes economist Diana Choyleva at Enodo Economics. It’s up to Washington “to take decisive steps to shore up confidence, including extending dollar credit lines to a clutch of Asian countries.”

As Choyleva stresses, “it is in Asia that the United States’ global financial hegemony is being most keenly contested – by China.”

It’s hard not to think Washington’s shutdown showdown is doing Beijing’s work for it.

Follow William Pesek on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading