Police investigating Singapore relocation firm Moovaz after it fails to deliver customers’ belongings

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

According to business release Tech in Asia, Moovaz has raised US$ 8 million in funding from investors including Quest Ventures, SG Innovate and Hustle Fund – its most recent money square was in 2021.

The report also said Moovaz has faced legal challenges, including a petition from its largest seller over paid service exceeding S$ 50,000. By August 2023, the judge ordered Moovaz to spend more than S$ 73,000, covering the company’s state and a wrongful termination event brought by a former staff, Tech in Asia said.

COMPANY STILL OPERATIONAL, CEO SAYS

When contacted, Moovaz CEO  Vishnu Vasudeven said the business remains administrative but was” greatly hit” by escalating Red Sea conflicts and rising transport costs.

” We are in the midst of arranging funds to pay the sellers… I believe everything will be sorted by mid-next fortnight,” he said.  

” I know what’s happening because every day I get a lot of threats ( from the ) police, debt collectors and news or social media. ”  

He told CNA that consumers whose things had already been shipped would get their possessions within the next two days. For those whose products are still in Singapore, Moovaz is arranging for them to pull up their goods next year, he added.  

But buyers say they still have not heard from the business.

Mr Noreen Caringal, who engaged Moovaz to travel her mother’s belongings to New Zealand, said the first phase of her shift in 2023 went easily.

With her subsequent delivery in September 2024, the  Moovaz employees who packed her issues told her she would get her things in eight to 12 days. But communication from the business ceased wholly by mid-December.

“ I was actually devastated because those are our family ’s things. Some of my kids ’ things, my wedding album is there, ” the 50-year-old said.  

“ I was so stressed about it, because ( it was ) a company that I trusted. Then abruptly they’re no longer replying or communicating about where my points are. ”

Ms Caringal received a visit from a Moovaz team member on Monday, who told her that the business was closing its inventory and she could arrange to gather her things.

He was never sure if she would find a compensation, but said she might have to make an additional payment to send her goods, she told CNA.  

Ms Chen, who moved to Hong Kong with her father in July, waited for weeks for their delivery to reach. Since they did n’t include many things, they were told their possessions would have to be consolidated with different supplies.  

The deal stated an eight to 12-week timeframe, meaning their goods, packed in end-June, may have shipped by October.

By the end of October, Ms Chen requested a full payment from Moovaz but did not find a reply. To check if the business was still operating, her father posed as a consumer and received a rapid response from the sales staff, Ms Chen said.    

In December, they received an email from  a transfer company based in Hong Kong. Despite the couple having paid S$ 2,500 to Moovaz  as full payment, the Hong Kong company said it has not been paid and wants US$ 1,160 to release their sale.  

” 20 YEARS OF MY LIFE IN THAT CONTAINER”

Another customer, Ms Hong, who paid Moovaz S$ 9,400 to transport her belongings to Seattle, said another relocation firm  contacted her immediately about unpaid receipts from Moovaz.

To find her things, she would have to spend Family Relocation over S$ 15,000 – the sum Moovaz owes them for handling her package.  

“So Moovaz has been doing something crazy, right? They were setting significantly lower rates to their clients, and then probably because of that, a lot of people will join them for their supplies, but their actual expense was much higher, ” she said, adding that she has also filed a police statement.  

CNA spoke to Family Relocation, who said it is owed about S$ 70,000 for eight affected customers. The company ’s business operations manager, Ronnie Heng, said they have since escalated the matter to the courts.

Moovaz has been ordered to pay them the amount owed, according to court documents from Jan 10, seen by CNA.  

“Financially, you can imagine the kind of stress we’re under. Our agents, our partners are coming to us for payment … and I have to explain to them what’s happening, ” he said.  

If Moovaz pays them what they’re owed, Family Relocation will reimburse customers who made additional payments, he added.  

Adrian, who moved to England, was similarly contacted by a freight forwarding company demanding US$ 13,750 – the amount owed by Moovaz – as well as daily storage fees of £70 to  £150 ( US$ 86 to US$ 185 ).  

He and his wife had already paid S$ 23,000 to Moovaz, but the company has not responded to their emails since December.   The family has made a police report.  

“If I did take them to court, I’d have to be in Singapore in person. They probably know that people who are moving internationally, they’re not going to come back to Singapore to do this, and they’ll just end up paying, ” he said.  

“This is 20 years of my life in that container, with my wife’s and my four kids ’ belongings and furniture. In our house in the UK, we’re just living out of a suitcase right now. ” 

Continue Reading

Muzinich & Co appoints director in Asia | FinanceAsia

By:
On:
In: Asia, Finance, South-East Asia

Private credit specialist Muzinich & Co. has appointed of Pam Hsieh as director – marketing & client relations.

Hsieh (pictured), based in Singapore, will focus on developing the firm’s relationships with financial intermediaries and wealth managers across Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore, according to a January 6 media release.

In her new role, Hsieh will report to Sashi Nambiar, head of financial intermediaries and wealth, Asia. She has over a decade of experience in asset management and wealth management, having held senior positions at Fidelity and BlackRock in Taiwan, most recently as vice president, wealth at BlackRock.

Nambiar said in the media release: “We welcome Pam to Muzinich at a time of growing interest in both public and private credit solutions among Asian investors. Her deep understanding of the wealth market and strong track record of building relationships with financial intermediaries will be invaluable as we continue to expand our presence in the region.”

Andrew Tan, chief executive officer, Asia Pacific (Apac), Muzinich & Co., added: “Pam’s appointment demonstrates our commitment to building a strong presence across both institutional and wealth management segments in Apac.”

Tan continued: “As Asian investors increasingly seek to diversify their portfolios through credit solutions, we are strategically expanding our team to better serve their evolving needs while maintaining our focus on delivering excellence in credit investing.”

The appointment follows a partnership with First Bank to bring its “parallel” lending strategy, MLoan, to the Taiwanese market.

And In September, Muzinich announced a partnership with Hong Kong’s Orion3 to launch an up to $1 billion infrastructure and real assets private debt strategy targeting several key markets in Apac. 

For more FinanceAsia people moves click here.  

 


¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Trump’s Paris Agreement withdrawal not such a bad thing – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

On his first time back in business as United States president, Donald Trump gave official notice of his nation’s return from the Paris Agreement – a crucial global treaty seeking to rein in climate change.

Before signing the attempt, Trump declared his causes to an area of cheering followers, describing the international agreement as an “unfair, one-sided Paris weather authority rip-off. ”

Of course, this is not the first day Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris deal – he did it in 2017, during his first term in office.

On one hand, Trump’s shift is a huge punch to work to global climate action. The US is the world’s second-biggest emission of greenhouse gas waste, after China. The state is vital to the international effort to curb climate change.

But given Trump’s weather for, it ’s actually better that the US excluded itself from international climate conversations while he is in power. That means, the rest of the world can get on with the task without Trump’s caustic effect.

This is not the first day Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris offer.   Photo: Ben Curtis / AP via The Talk

A quick recap on the Paris Agreement

Signed by 196 countries in 2015, the Paris Agreement is the first comprehensive international agreement to combat climate change.

Its overall purpose is to maintain the increase of global heat to well below 2°C above pre-industrial ranges and undertake efforts to control the raise to 1. 5°C.

Experts say meeting the more optimistic 1. 5°C goal is important because crossing that threshold risks unleashing catastrophic climate change effects, for as more frequent and severe drought and wildfires.

Under the deal, each state may produce national plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to help achieve the global temperatures goals. These programs are known as “nationally determined contributions”.

What Trump’s removal methods

Under Trump’s next administration, the US was only out of the Paris package for four weeks, due to the time it took for the surrender to take effect. President Joe Biden rejoined the contract in early 2021.

This day, the US withdrawal may be established more immediately – after a year. Finally, the US will add Iran, Libya and Yemen as the only United Nations states no party to the contract.

The US is preserve participating as a celebration to the Paris deal until January 2026. That means it does try to negotiate at the COP30 climate change event in Brazil this time.

COP30 is a big deal. It is when each region is due to current its innovative nationally determined efforts. The US removal means it is unlikely to provide a new input to the conference – if it attends at all.

If the US display up, its presence would probably destabilize negotiations. That’s why removing Trump-backed diplomats from the climate talks going forwards is a good result.

If the US stayed in the camp under Trump, its diplomats may, for example, agitate to diminish any talks struck at the conference. We saw quite techniques from Saudi Arabia at COP29 in Baku. The fuel state constantly disrupted the talks and in one example, sought to change critical text in the agreement without full consultation.

With the US out of the way, the other parties to the Paris Agreement have a better chance of progressing climate negotiations.

At this stage, it does n’t appear other countries are preparing to follow Trump out the door. This is despite controversy at the COP29 talks when Argentinian president Javier Milei ordered his negotiators to withdraw only a few days in. Milei had previously described the climate emergency as a “socialist lie. ”

At this stage, Trump has not withdrawn from the Paris Agreement’s parent convention, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. So after it withdraws from the Paris deal, the US can still attend COP meetings, but only as an observer.

With the US out of the way, other parties to the Paris agreement have a better chance of progress. Pictured: COP29 President Mukhtar Babayev, left, with an unnamed woman, listens during a closing session.   Photo: Rafiq Maqbool / AP via The Conversation

Onwards and upwards

Of course, there are downsides to the US withdrawal from the Paris deal.

Leaving the Paris Agreement means the US is no longer required to provide annual updates on its greenhouse gas emissions. This lack of transparency makes it harder to determine how the world is tracking on emissions reduction overall.

Under the Biden administration, the US contributed funding to help developing nations adopt clean energy and cope with climate change ( albeit delivering less than it promised ). Trump is expected to slash this funding. That will leave vulnerable nation-states in an even more precarious position.

While the US was technically only out of the Paris deal for a short period last time, the process was destabilizing. It weakened what was an unprecedented show of international solidarity and sent a damaging message about the importance of climate action.

Trump’s latest withdrawal is a similar blow to morale. It’s particularly galling for Americans fighting for climate action, and those struggling with its devastating effects – most recently, the unthinkable fires in Los Angeles.

But Trump’s withdrawal can easily be reversed by a new US president. And we can expect other parties to Paris, such as China and the European Union, to continue to play a leadership role, and others to fill the vacuum.

What’s more, as others have noted, Trump cannot derail global climate action. Investment in clean energy is now greater than in fossil fuels. When Trump last pulled out of Paris, many US state and local governments pressed ahead with climate policy; we can expect the same this time around.

And the vast majority of the rest of the world is still pursuing emissions reduction efforts.

So overall, the US exit from Paris is probably the best of a bunch of bad options. It mutes Trump’s capacity to destabilize international climate action, allowing others to step into the breach.

Rebekkah Markey-Towler is PhD Candidate, Melbourne Law School, and research fellow, Melbourne Climate Futures, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Japan: TV star Masahiro Nakai retires amid sex scandal

By:
On:
In: Asia
35 days earlier
Koh Ewe

BBC News

AFP This photo taken on February 2020 shows Masahiro Nakai, a former member of the J-Pop boy band sensation SMAP and a celebrity television host, speaking in Tokyo.AFP

Chinese TV host Masahiro Nakai, one of the country’s most recognized eyes on television, has announced that he is retiring after a sexual assault incident that has rocked the government’s entertainment business.

Nakai, who presented for Fuji Television, was accused of sexually assaulting a girl at a 2023 dinner group held by employees.

Lots of companies have pulled their promotions from Fuji Television amid promises that the agency’s personnel had tried to cover up the incident.

Nakai has denied using violence against the girl, and said on 9 January that he had “resolved” the problem with her through a lawsuit. But this did much to suppress public indignation.

In a social media statement posted on Thursday, Nakai said that he was” really sorry for causing problems and loss to so many people”.

” I’m really, really sad for saying good-bye this way. “

His departure comes days after Fuji Television leader Koichi Minato confirmed that the organization did not disclose Nakai’s incident despite being aware of it long before it was reported in the media.

Vehicle manufacturers Nissan and Toyota, as well as financial firm Seven & I assets which runs the financial 7-eleven comfort keep network, were among those that announced they were pulling advertisements from Fuji Television over the incident.

Fuji Television is expected to set up an independent commission to investigate the incident.

Appearances of Nakai have also been scrubbed from schemes.

Nakai soared to fame in the 1990s as the leader of Chinese child group SMAP, one of Asia’s most productive works. The team released more than 50 singles- many of which became table toppers- and launched a regular selection show on prime-time television.

Getty Images The members of SMAP standing in a row and posing for photos at an event, mostly wearing black outfits. Getty Images

After SMAP disbanded in 2016, Nakai went on to become a television network as well as one of the wealthiest stars in Japan.

Japan’s pleasure industry is facing a reckoning with much unspoken instances of sexual abuse.

In 2023, J-pop professional Johnny Kitagawa, who by then had been deceased for four years, was exposed to had sexually abused plenty of boys and young men for years.

His talent company, Johnny & Associates, had managed SMAP among other boy bands.

Continue Reading

Trump’s Stargate a bold reach for AI’s next frontier – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

In one of his first moves as the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump announced a new US$ 500 billion project called Stargate to accelerate the development of artificial intelligence ( AI ) in the US.

The job is a collaboration between three big tech companies – OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle. Trump called it “the largest AI infrastructure project by far in history” and said it would help keep “the future of technology ” in the US.

Tech businessman Elon Musk, however, had a different take, claiming without evidence on his system X that the project’s donors “don’t really have the money. ” X, which is not included in Stargate, is even working on developing AI and Musk is a foe to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

Alongside announcing Stargate, Trump even revoked an executive order signed by his father Joe Biden that was aimed at addressing and controlling AI challenges.

Seen together, these two techniques embody a culture prevalent in software development that can best be summed up by the word: “move fast and break things. ”

What is Stargate?

The US is now the world’s pioneer when it comes to AI advancement. The Stargate task will considerably extend this guide over different nations.

It will see a system of data centres built across the US. These centres will building massive computer machines required for running AI applications such as ChatGPT. These machines will operate 24/7 and may require significant amounts of electricity and water to work.

According to a speech by OpenAI, construction of new data locations as part of Stargate is currently underway in the US state of Texas:

[ W]e are evaluating potential sites across the country for more campuses as we finalise definitive agreements.

US President Donald Trump speaking at the White House alongside Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son, Oracle chief technology officer Larry Ellison and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.   Photo: Julia Demaree Nikhinson

An inadequate – but encouraging – order

The increased funding into AI growth by Trump is encouraging. It may help improve the many possible benefits of AI. For instance, AI may increase cancer patients ’ prognosis by quickly analyzing clinical information and detecting early signs of illness.

But Trump’s continuous renewal of Biden’s professional get on the “safe, safe and reliable development and use of AI” is deeply concerning. It could mean that any potential gains of Stargate are immediately trumped by its potential to exacerbate the existing affects of AI systems.

Yes, Biden’s get lacked critical technical details. But it was a tempting start towards developing safer and more responsible AI techniques. One big problem it was meant to address was tech firms collecting personal information for AI education without second obtaining acceptance.

AI techniques collect information from all over the internet. Even if data are readily available on the internet for individual use, it does not imply AI systems may use them for training. Moreover, when a picture or word is fed into an AI unit, it cannot be removed. There have been many instances of  artists suing Artificial craft generators  for  the unauthorised use  of their labor.

Another problem Biden’s get aimed to address was the risk of harm – especially to people from minority areas.

Most Artificial devices aim to increase accuracy for the majority. Without proper pattern, they can make really dangerous choices for a few.

For instance, in 2015, an image-recognition algorithm developed by Google immediately tagged pics of black individuals as “gorillas. ” This equal concern was later found in AI techniques of other organizations such as Yahoo and Apple, and remains unanswered a century later because these methods are so often incomprehensible actually to their creators.

This opacity makes it crucial to design AI systems correctly from the start. Problems can be deeply embedded in the AI system itself, worsening over time and becoming nearly impossible to fix.

As AI tools increasingly make important decisions, such as résumé screening, minorities are being even more disproportionately affected. For example, AI-powered face recognition software more commonly misidentifies black people and other people of color, which has led to false arrests and imprisonment.

YouTube video

[embedded content]

Faster, more powerful AI systems

Trump’s twin AI announcements in the first days of his second term as US president show his main focus in terms of AI – and that of the biggest tech companies in the world – is on developing ever faster, more powerful AI systems.

If we compare an AI system with a car, this is like developing the fastest car possible while ignoring crucial safety features like seat belts or airbags in order to keep it lighter and thus faster.

For both cars and AI, this approach could mean putting very dangerous machines into the hands of billions of people around the world.

Armin Chitizadeh is lecturer, School of Computer Science, University of Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Trump uncertainty and its measurement – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Subscribe now  with a one-month trial for only$ 1, then enjoy the first year at an exclusive rate of just$ 99.

Trump confusion and its dimension

David Goldman features stresses around the US budget deficit, rising true produces, and uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s proposed guidelines. Market uncertainty remains subdued, except in silver, which serves as a hedge against inflation and money volatility.

Trump’s tax order was force Europe into a lose-lose choice

Diego Faßnacht outlines the essential dilemma Europe may face under a minute Trump administration, where violent US trade policies may force the EU to choose between decoupling from China and coordinating with Washington or facing punishing tariffs.

Contradictory US messaging sky Ukraine harmony work

James Davis observes that while the new US leadership has expressed interest in ending the war in Ukraine, its approach lacks quality, with Moscow wary of contradictory information combining negotiation efforts with threats of harsher sanctions.

Movie changes the AI scenery

Scott Foster highlights the announcement of the$ 500 billion Stargate AI infrastructure project. With a finances roughly 10 times the CHIPS Act ’s$ 52. 7 billion, the initiative aims to develop 20 data centers over four years in a strong drive to cement US authority in AI.

Continue Reading

Trump’s China trade war plan keeps markets guessing – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Your shift, President Xi. This may be the important information from Donald Trump’s amazing reversal on large “day one ” tariffs on China.

The reprieve Trump appears to have granted  Asia’s biggest economy  is one Xi Jinping’s Communist Party certainly did n’t see coming. For weeks now, Trump and the gang of anti-China advisers he’s named to his new administration promised immediate 60 % tariffs as the centerpiece of a “shock-and-awe ” trade war.

No so quickly, it turns out. Taxes on Chinese goods are somewhat excluded from the storm of first-week executive orders. When pressed, Trump actually lowered his places. Whereas Canada and Mexico face 25 % levies by February 1, China might suffer a mere 10 %.

Chances are, this is Trump’s means of cajoling Xi to the dealing stand for a large Group of Two  business deal. To be sure, slow-walking China levies are aimed primarily at the share market.

Though Trump was n’t worry less about laws, standards or political politeness, he cares a great deal about Wall Street. Stories about stocks tumbling this year are the last thing the new US senator wants.

But Trump is also spoiling for an incredible clash with China, particularly once he realizes that Xi is n’t Shinzo Abe.

Beginning in December 2012, Japanese Prime Minister Abe pledged to revive an market hard being eclipsed by China. In the years that followed, Abe empowered the  Bank of Japan  to force its ultraloose guidelines into unknown territory and took steps to improve corporate governance.

Next came the Trump 1. 0 age, threatening trade war the likes of which Asia had never seen. Instantly, Abe snapped to focus to attempt to protect Asia’s No. 2 business from Trump’s taxes.

Following Trump’s impact vote win in November 2016, Abe made a run for New York. He was the first earth leader to visit Trump Tower to thank the man.

Abe did more than that, vouching for the “America First” leader in flowing words. “ I am convinced Mr. Trump is a leader in whom I may have great confidence ” and “a relationship of trust, ” Abe told investigators that day.

In the months and years that followed, Abe made a world splash  wining and dining  with Trump’s second White House group— including at Trump’s Florida sport team. On top of throwing praise, He gifted him premium golf equipment, including a US$ 3,755 motorist, among other extravagant gifts.

Abe was feted as a political Trump vehicle, credited for protecting Japan from the worst of the business conflict. One method Abe tamed Trump was acquiescing to a diplomatic trade deal in 2019. Abe’s genuine success was in running out the time on Trump 1. 0. By slow-walking on negotiations, Tokyo managed to achieve a “draw ” between the two nations.

At the end of the process, Japan effectively agreed to the same market-opening steps it had under the Barack Obama-led Trans-Pacific Partnership ( TPP ) pact that Trump scrapped.

Group Abe distracted Trump with greater market exposure for US meat, pork, and maize exporters. But the offer clearly did n’t include electrical products. Tokyo rejoiced.

“With typical hyperbole, President Trump declared the deal phenomenal, ” notes Matthew Goodman, who at the time led economic policy for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “ But once again, President Trump … settled for a simple package. ”

You Xi pull off a comparable rearranging-of-the-deckchairs US business deal? The question is whether Xi’s group may even care.

After all, some earth leaders had a worse  2024  than Xi. China ’s home issue, weak home need, near-record youth unemployment and aging people have produced negative forces for seven consecutive rooms now.

The second-biggest market also saw an alarming increase in in-person demonstrations. And  China Inc.   is also dealing with the fallout from Xi’s tech-sector onslaught.

Xi, in other words, has some issues for which to reply. It is questionable his group would be glad to see the most prominent Chinese leader since Mao Zedong appearing to lose ground to Trump — or appearing to bow to Washington on the world stage.

But Xi even definitely knows that after a period of quiet, Trump will almost certainly purchase up the taxes he’s threatened — and perhaps even bigger types than he’s telegraphed. Trump’s leading patron, Tesla businessman Elon Musk, last month talked about the  needed for tariffs on Chinese energy cars.

“The Taiwanese car companies are the most economical car companies in the world, ” Musk told investors. “So, I think they will have major success outside of China depending on what kind of taxes or business restrictions are established. ” Musk has since walked backwards these remarks, but China has every reason to worry Trump might come after China ’s car market.

For today, Trump claims to have commissioned a broad overview of Washington ’s trade ties with China and other vital trading lovers. The White House, Team Trump says, will “investigate and treatment consistent trade deficits that damage our business and safety. ”

Such evaluations take occasion, of course. Times, in some cases. But Trump’s US Trade Representative company almost needs satellites to know that his 2018 cope with Xi was a failure. To Chad Bown at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the way in which the second Trump-Xi trade deal “fell little ” is the “anatomy of a dud. ”

As Bown sees it, “attempting to  maintain trade  — to join Trump’s goal of reducing the diplomatic trade imbalance— was self-defeating from the  begin. It did not help that neither China nor the United States was eager to de-escalate their painful price war. ”

Nor does that seem the path now as Trump surrounds himself with China secularists. They include assistant Peter Navarro, who co-wrote a text titled  “Death By China. ” And deal king Robert  Lighthizer, who’s signaled that Trump 2. 0 is considering a  currency devaluation ploy.

Yet US Treasury Secretary-nominee Scott Bessent, who’s considered less MAGA-ish than most Trump government takes, has taken to discussing China in dark conditions. During his subsequent confirmation reading, Bessent  said China had “the most uneven business in the history of the world ” and that it might be suffering a “severe recession/depression. ”

Bessent even segued to MAGA talking factors about Beijing’s presumably flooding the world with cheap products to finance its military passions. Commenting on Trump’s earlier deal, Bessent argued that “China has not made good on their [agriculture ] purchases ” and that the US will push Beijing to resume those purchases and perhaps add a “make-up provision. ”

But all this speaks to the great odds that Trump’s industry war may reemerge sooner rather than later. “If there’s any training for US-China ties from Trump 1. 0, it is that he is a fluctuation system and predicting what he will do is a sucker’s game, ” says lifelong China watcher  Bill  Bishop, who writes the Sinocism email.

Bishop notes that investors “had found some comfort in the fact that President Trump did not impose more tariffs on [ China ] on his first day in office, but they forget his earlier promise to impose 10 % tariffs, in addition to any other tariffs that may come on, because of fentanyl. He reiterated the 10 % tax hazard Tuesday. ”

The wait does purchase Xi a huge opportunity. While Trump is distracted with local exploits – from avenging his critics to overseeing a large imprisonment system for illegal residents to devising tax cuts – Xi’s team may expand efforts to reduce its trade surplus the natural way by increasing regional demand as a means of boosting import activity.

On the one hand, China ’s nearly US$ 1 trillion trade surplus proves that efforts by Trump 1. 0 and the West in general to alter the mechanics of world trade came up short. China ’s global manufacturing dominance has only grown since 2017, a fact Trump 2. 0 can verify with a mere Google search. Yet Xi has the power to alter these  global dynamics.

A vital first step would be to end the property crisis once and for all. The drip, drip, drip of bad news about housing demand and prices is deflating consumer prices and confidence simultaneously. Beijing’s slow response continues to inspire “Japanification ” chatter and have some on Wall Street debating if China is “uninvestable. ”

On Monday, Fitch Ratings downgraded homebuilder  China Vanke Co. , a reminder that default risks continue to hover over the sector. The move “reflects a deterioration in China Vanke’s sales and cash generation, which is eroding its liquidity buffer against large capital market debt maturities in 2025,” says Fitch analyst  Rebecca Tang.

Trouble is, Vanke’s challenges are hardly unique. The extreme downward  pressure on the yuan, meantime ,  could increase default risks as offshore debt payments become harder to make. This tug of war is limiting the People’s Bank of China ’s latitude to cut interest rates.

Xi could take steps to accelerate China ’s pivot toward increased domestic demand-led growth, reducing Trump 2. 0’s argument that Beijing is n’t sharing its 5 % rate of annual output globally.

At the moment, “China’s  economy is showing signs of revival, led by industrial output and exports, ” says Frederic Neumann, chief Asia  economist at  HSBC.

Yet a trade war would put these drivers in harm’s way. What’s needed are large and robust social safety nets to encourage  households  to spend more and save less. Xi and Premier Li Qiang talk often about doing so, but little has been achieved to transform China ’s consumption dynamics.

The drop in “spending on property by roughly half since the peak in 2021 represents a huge drop in  domestic demand, which cannot be easily replaced by more spending on consumer goods or government investment, ” says economist Duncan Wrigley at Pantheon Macroeconomics.

Only top-down policy shifts in Beijing could jumpstart household demand and halt the deflationary pressures making headlines. At the same time, international funds are still waiting on moves to strengthen capital markets, improve corporate transparency, reduce the dominance of state-owned enterprises and make more space for startups to disrupt the economy.

This will require considerable political will in Beijing – and patience on the part of investors. Though markets crave major retooling, they don’t often afford Team Xi the space and time needed to execute them.

Moves to repair, change or tweak China ’s engines are certain to depress growth somewhat. Markets, though, tend to react badly when upgrades soften growth.

This paradox has carried over into 2025. The slow pace of reform in recent years is catching up with Xi’s government, and markets are reacting badly. Mainland stocks began 2025 with their  weakest start since 2016. That has Beijing rolling out measures to stabilize equities.

Among them is boosting how much pensions can invest in listed Chinese companies as investors brace for the second Trump administration. It’s part of a Beijing directive is to “steady the stock market, and clear bottlenecks for the introduction of mid-to-long-term capital, ” according to the China Securities Regulatory Commission.

Yet nothing might steady Chinese markets faster than knowing how or when Trump might tax Beijing– and by how much. Until traders get an answer, 2025 is sure to make market volatility great again.  

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading