Twice-daily feed for jumbo
At the Thai Elephant Conservation Centre in Lampang state, visitors may visit the sick Thai giant Sak Surin, but only by watching the life flow of his 30-day isolation at house on their phones and tablets.
Although Varawut Silpa-Archa, the secretary of natural resources and environment, was eventually able to say when the life broadcast would start, it was announced on the center’s fan page that there would be two survive streams each day, from 2pm to 2.30pm and 4.30 pm to 5pm.
According to Mr. Varawut, the center will also record video of the rhinoceros being treated in isolation for later viewing.
Sak Surin will be on display for public viewing once he has completely recovered, and the center will make that announcement, the man said.
After being flown from Sri Lanka to Chiang Mai on Sunday, Sak Surin is already under a 30-day isolation at the Lampang center.
According to Mr. Varawut, the elephant was transported by truck to the center that night after the plane touched down at Chiang Mai aircraft at 2.03 p.m. on Sunday.
According to Livestock Department regulations, the female pachyderm was soon placed in isolation and will be closely watched for disease for at least 30 times.
Three Thai animals, including Sak Surin, were given to Sri Lanka as a gift in 2001. Before ending up at Aluthgama Kande Viharaya in the north of Sri Lanka, where he carried sacred relics during yearly Buddhist rallies, the man had changed arms numerous times.
The rhinoceros was being kept in leg shackles and had accidents all over his body, according to information from Rally for Animal Rights and Environment( Rare ), an animal shelter organization based in Sri Lanka. It demanded that the Thai authorities return the rhino for medical attention and safety.
With the help of the Thai consulate in Colombo and the institutions, preparations for his relocation took six months. The animal’s relocation cost approximately 19.5 million ringgit in emergency funding.
Centara Grand Hotel Osaka introduces Thai-style hospitality to Japan
The Centara Grand Hotel Osaka introduces Japanese kindness in the Thai fashion.
The premier hotel chain in Thailand, Centara Hotels & amp, Resorts, has celebrated the grand opening of its first-ever entry into the burgeoning Asian market. Centara Grand Hotel Osaka, which is situated in the center of Namba’s thriving shopping and entertainment area, is now available to welcome visitors from all over the globe with its distinctive warm hospitality, first-rate service, and Thai family values at the core of each stay. His Excellency the Thai Ambassador to Japan, Singtong Lapisatepun( 7th from left ), Suthikiati Chirathivat( 8th ), Chairman of the Board of Directors, Centara Hotels & amp, Resorts, Takashi Yamazaki( second from right ), Executive Officer, Chief Director of Urban Development of Taisei Corporation, and Kenichi Fujino( 6th, right ) attended the grand opening ceremony at the hotel.
Late deal keeps coalition happy
Speaker Wan Nor is supported by Pheu Thai of the MFP.
Wan Muhammad Nor Matha, the head of the Prachachat Party, will be nominated as House speaker by the Pheu Thai Party and the Move Forward Party( MFP ), putting an end to a contentious race for the position.
Pita Limjaroenrat, the leader of the MFP, stated at a press conference on Monday night that the two parties had decided to name Mr. Wan Nor for the position of House speaker, with an MP from that party serving as the first lieutenant speaker and another Pheu Thai MP.
According to him, the eight potential partnership parties agreed to this plan.
After Pheu Thai informed the MFP that the dispute was between the two parties, six partnership celebrations were abruptly excluded from the press event.
Phumtham Wechayachai, the assistant Pheu Thai leader, declared on Monday that Mr. Wan Nor was well-liked by all parties and that this would put an end to the post-related impasse.
He claimed that in order to establish a political government, the most crucial factor was to keep wholeness.
Cholnan Srikaew, the leader of Pheu Thai, assured the party’s MPs that they would not select anyone to challenge Mr. Wan Nor.
After Pheu Thai suggested giving Mr. Wan Nor the House speaker position to end the deadlock over the visit during a Monday inside meeting, the media conference was held.
Early in the day, Party MPs and directors gathered to discuss the matter and decided that Mr. Wan Nor, a seasoned politician and former House speech, was the most qualified candidate for the position.
After Pheu Thai and the MFP were unable to resolve the impasse in their appointment with the other six potential coalition parties on Sunday, Mr. Wan Nor was chosen as PHEU Thai’s candidate. Before the House meets now to elect a new speech, they were able to come to an official agreement.
In the event that Mr. Pita’s attempt to get excellent minister failed, they discussed letting Pheu Thai take the initiative in forming the new government next year. Pheu Thai did resign in exchange and allow the MFP to assume the House speaker position.
As soon as the benefits of the May 14 general election were made public, both factions fought over the position. While Pheu Thai remained steadfast in its conviction that it deserved the position of head of the legislative branch, the MFP wanted Padipat Suntiphada, a Phitsanulok MP, to be the new House speech.
Pheu Thai instructed advertising shops to hold off until the eight-party alliance’s joint press conference at 7 p.m. following the official opening of parliament yesterday.
After learning of Pheu Thai’s present, Mr. Wan Nor stated that he did not want the position but would accept it if it was expedite the formation of the alliance. The two functions and the other partners agreed on this.
If they come to an agreement, I’m willing to accept the position, he said.
The Prachachat Party, which won nine House votes in the general election, was the third-largest group out of the eight-party union. According to a cause, Pheu Thai’s decision to support Mr. Wan Nor was unable to quell group conflicts because some factions were vying for the position.
The MFP had two options after Pheu Thai refused to give in, according to the source: accept the plan or leave the alliance and join the opposition.
According to the origin, Mr. Pita, the MFP’s leader, might not be appointed prime minister if it chose the second option, but it could deal with important ministries to support its core policies. Questionable ones, such as changing Section 112 or the Lese Majeste Law, would probably be put on hold.
Chuan Leekpai, a former House speaker and member of the Democrat record, supported Mr. Wan Nor on Monday and the following day, saying the Prachachat leader had already demonstrated his competence. He claimed to have collaborated with Mr. Wan Nor, who is regarded as competent and objective.
HM King officially opens parliament
On Monday, His Majesty the King presided over the state opening of the new congress and urged the members of parliament to carry out their responsibilities in the nation’s best interests.
The new parliament developing in the Kiakkai neighborhood of the Dusit area, Sappaya-Sapatathan, hosted the state opening for the first time.
At 5.16 p.m. on Monday, Her Majesty the Queen and His Majness the King arrived at the brand-new challenging.
936 dignitaries attended the ceremony, including international ambassadors, the interim prime minister, caretaker government members, chiefs of the Supreme Court, and additional independent organizations.
” I presently declare the parliament open with the first congress conference being called to order and the vote of members of parliament having concluded.” I want to share with you the sense of obligation it has been given to you to speak for the people when it comes to enacting the rules that will allow the government to run state affairs.
The extent of the nation’s progress depends on your intelligence, capacity, and capacity to preserve the integrity that may lead you in carrying out your duty to serve, with the interests of both the country and the people at the top of mind. You will be able to carry out your duty properly for the sake of real progress and security of the nation and the people if you are constantly aware of such duty.
” I send you all my best intentions for the successful and efficient operation of legislature.” His Majesty the King wished you happiness and prosperity.
Yellenâs Beijing trip wonât stop âcold warâ
During US Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen’s attend to Beijing later this year, top-level formal meetings between China and the US will be held. In the short term, neither party anticipates a substantial improvement in connections, but there is cause for optimism that they may eventually come to terms with one another’s differences.
According to China’s Ministry of Finance, Yellen may travel to Beijing from July 6 to July 9. This decision was made following a conversation between the two nations. The original Fed Chairman is regarded as a US politician who is reasonably cordial with China.
Following Blinken’s visit on June 18 – 19, Yellen will arrive before an anticipated meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Joe Biden. The best topics on the agenda for the upcoming Xi-Biden dialogues will continue to be Taiwan problems, the Ukraine War, and US device export bans.
Foreign observers claimed that because Washington formally began a Cold War with China, it is doubtful that the US will soon stop putting new restrictions on China’s high-tech industry. & nbsp,
Professor of global relations Zhang Weiwei of Fudan University claimed on a TV programme on June 26 that the US, which refused to acknowledge that China is rising, was to blame for the Sino-US conflict. Additionally, he claimed that the US’s assumption that it could prevent China from rising was a grave error.
But, he added, the circumstance appears to be getting better. & nbsp,
Zhang cited the Elizabeth Kuebler-Ross stages of grieving in psychology as evidence that the US appears to have moved past the first two stages — denial and anger— and is now moving on to the third stage, which refers to” partial acceptance and bargaining ,” after failing to defeat China in the trade and technology wars. The terms” depression” and” acceptance” refer to the fourth and fifth stages, respectively.
He continued by saying that China has not yet resumed defense negotiations with the US in an effort to reassure the latter of its lack of military apprehension.
In a statement released on Sunday at US time, the US Treasury Department stated that Yellen will meet with representatives from the People’s Republic of China in Beijing to explore” the importance for our countries- as the two largest economies– to properly manage our relationship, communicate immediately about areas of concern, and work up to address worldwide challenges.”
The Treasury Department stated in a statement Yellen gave in April that the US will work to” safe its regional security interests along with those of our friends and to protect human rights through targeted activities that are not intended to gain financial advantage.”
According to the statement,” We seek a good financial relationship with China that promotes socially beneficial growth and innovation and expands financial option for American workers and businesses.” Additionally, we want to work together to address urgent global issues like loan stress and climate change.
a few contexts
Before much of that does happen, there is a distance to travel. On June 19, Blinken was given a seat across from Chinese diplomat Wang Yi when they first met in Beijing, with Xi occupying the center seat. The sitting program, according to Chinese pundits, was intended to demonstrate to the world that China was instructing the US.
On June 20, Biden fired back, claiming that Xi was unaware of the Chinese balloon’s presence when he ordered its shoot-down over US aircraft in first February during an event in California. He claimed that it was” tremendous humiliation for rulers when they did not know what happened.”
The Chinese ambassador in the US formally protested Biden’s remarks to the White House on June 21.
Biden met Xie Feng, China’s fresh adviser to the US, in the White House on June 30. The voice got a little bit better.
Biden accepted the Letter of Credence of Xie and welcomed the ambassador, who had taken office on May 23, to his new position, according to a statement posted on the website of the Foreign embassy. They had a discussion about the Sino-US connection. The speech displayed two images, in which Biden shakes Xie’s hand twice and is positioned very close to the latter and his family Wang Dan.
It will take more than that for the two nations to significantly lessen the mistrust and hostility that permeate standard lines and public opinion on both sides.
Liu Yong, a military journalist based in Hubei, writes in an essay published on Monday that” Yellen’s visit to China may not have taken into account Chinese problems.” Yellen stated that she wants to reestablish contact with China. She is, however, claiming that the US wants China to make concessions and uphold British objectives. “& nbsp,
He claims that” US debts is one of the centers among China – US economic subjects.” Since China has been disposing of US Treasury Bonds repeatedly in recent years, the US has grown concerned. Yet if China purchases more, it won’t be nearly enough to appease the US.
He continues by saying that during Yellen’s attend, Washington is likely to put pressure on Beijing by using Taiwanese problems.
China had$ 867.1 billion in US Treasury bonds as of last year, down from$ 1.12 trillion at the end of 2018. During the same time period, Japan’s holding of US Treasury securities increased from$ 1.04 trillion to$ 1.08 trillion, while the UK saw a growth in its having from$ 288 billion to 654.5 billion. & nbsp,
Despite Beijing’s vehement resistance, nine US politicians traveled to Taiwan between June 27 and 29. & nbsp,
tech outlaw
Due to rising US-China political tensions, the two sides have never held standard talks since US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chinese Defense Minister Wei Feng met in Cambodia last November. Austin and Li Shangfu, the innovative Chinese Defense Minister, shook hands on June 2 in the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, but there was no formal meeting between them.
In a presentation on June 28, Liu Pengyu, the Chinese Embassy’s official in Washington, stated that if the US wants to continue high-level military negotiations with China, restrictions may be lifted. & nbsp,
The US will make sure that China doesn’t use American technology to create fast weapons or violate human rights, according to Blinken, who claimed to have told his Taiwanese rivals during his trip to Beijing on the same day.
The French government announced on June 30 that in order to trade specific DUV lithography tools, ASML will need to use for licenses starting on September 1. According to ASML, the ban will have an impact on China’s imports of its Twinscan NXT: 1980Di, which may produce 38 millimeter chips in a single coverage.
According to an unknown spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Commerce on Saturday,” In recent years, the US has consistently generalized the concept of regional security, abused export control measures, and sacrificed the interests of its allies to force and earn over various countries to suppress and contain Chinese semiconductor industry in order to maintain its international hegemony.”
Guan Xiansen, a poet from Guangdong, writes in an article that was published on Sunday,” While Blinken promoted Yellen’s visit to China, the weakening of his approach was cursory.” He made an effort to downplay the fact that the US is actively repressing and controlling China, claiming that its sanctions just apply to regions that do not serve its objectives.
He” made conspiracy theory conclusions that China may” improperly use” some essential systems without any supporting evidence.” According to Guan, this unfounded claim demonstrates how the US evaluates some based solely on its own experiences.
The US will quickly tighten its sanctions against China, despite Chinese commentators’ continued optimism that China may ultimately defeat the US.
Following Yellen’s trip to China, Washington will forbid Nvidia from exporting its artificial intelligence ( AI ) chips, such as the A800 and H800, to the country, according to a report in the US media last week. At the end of July, Biden will also sign an executive order prohibiting US funds from investing in high technology industries in China.
Study: AI device bans obstruct US-China trade negotiations
At & nbsp, @ jeffpao3 is Jeff Pao’s Twitter account.
UK’s Cleverly criticises Hong Kong police for issuing arrest warrants for activists
LONDON: James Cleverly, the British foreign minister, criticized the Hong Kong police’s decision to issue arrest warrants for eight activists from abroad and declared that China would not bear any attempts to intimidate people. He stated on Twitter that the decision to challenge arrest warrants for 8 protesters— some ofContinue Reading
Chinaâs military wonât talk to the US ã¼ so what?
US officers keep requesting mil-to-mil contacts from China. However, the Chinese navy is aware that if you want to frighten Americans, avoid speaking to them.
During his most recent trip to China, Antony Blinken, the secretary of state, constantly urged his guests to set up a military-to-military issue communications andnbsp line. Chinese deteriorated. & nbsp,
Admiral John Aquilino, the commander of USINDOPACOM, complained earlier this year that the Chinese were disobeying his requests to set up direct communication channels with the People’s Liberation Army( PLA ) regional commands.
Additionally, when he requested a meeting with China’s Defense Minister Li Shangfu during the & nbsp, Shangri – La Dialogue, in June, Defense Secretary and nBSP, Lloyd Austin, was rebuffed.
It’s possible that bottom American military and civilian authorities are worried. Instead of having their Chinese rivals on rate ring, they should be more concerned about having insufficient Navy ships, boats, or companies of anti-ship cruise missiles.
China is able to get in touch with US causes.
For a number of years, the US government has engaged in combat with the Taiwanese government in Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea. And it’s a stroke of luck that no one has been hurt or killed.
How important is having designated contact channels with the PLA? It isn’t that important. Additionally, the PLA is aware of how to contact the US government in the region if it so chooses. & nbsp,
All forces operating in the sea and / or air already have communication programmes in place. Additionally, you’ll notice that the Chinese military regularly warns US, American, Chinese, American, and other ships and plane to stay away from what they claim to be their territory.
The Chinese believe that without China’s consent, Americans( and everyone else ) should not be operating in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Thus, the relationship’s strengthen is established. Having a different or unique” communications website” isn’t going to make anyone’s brain change. & nbsp,
What’s bad with mil-to-mil alerts, exactly?
The Chinese are skilled at what they do when the PLA attempts to ram or hinder US boats and aircraft. And the directives are from above.
It seems futile to be able to call the Chinese on a predetermined line and warn them not to do what they are doing. The Chinese are aware of the US’s discontent. They are also unconcerned.
You might ask once more,” Why won’t China agree to & nbsp, mil-to-mil hotlines?” & nbsp,
The Americans’ desire for such a communications network is largely to blame for the solution. Andnbsp, It’s possible( however, likely ) that the Americans will make some sort of agreement to persuade the Chinese to join such a website if they refuse. Consider not bringing up a Chinese detective bubble flying over the United States. & nbsp,
It’s possible that the grant isn’t even on the government front. It may involve loosening the PRC’s financial sanctions against it. Or perhaps it isn’t complaining about & nbsp, China’s violations of human rights, abuses, or intellectual property theft. & nbsp,
Another concession might be to claim that Xi Jinping is unaware of the fentanyl & nbsp, which killed 70,000 Americans in 2022.
US businesses in the Indo-Pacific are continuing.
Some may wonder if the two militaries’ lack of communication has an impact on US operations in the Indo-Pacific and nbsp place. No truly, is the response. In addition, & nbsp,
The Chinese are aware of their actions and their goals. Their goal is to expel Americans from the Asia-Pacific and establish the PRC as the region’s dominant force. They have made this clear much, nbsp. & nbsp,
Due to China’s status and goal, the relationship is hostile. Additionally, there won’t be any interaction or relationship with the PRC or the PLA that will change anything. In addition, & nbsp,
For a few years, the US government spent all of its time in” connection” and” engagement” with the PLA. That was prior to the Trump presidency. In fact, the PLA received two invitations to the premier regional exercise of the US Navy, & nbsp, RIMPAC. In addition, & nbsp,
What benefits did this legislation bring the US? A Chinese military that has caught up to the US in many areas but outperformed it in others is called & nbsp. In some situations, they might offer the US military a bloody head. & nbsp, a nose that is very bloody. In addition, & nbsp,
The fact that some US officials are then urging a return to uncontrolled relationship with the PLA and the PRC is astounding. At some point, this will result in British deaths. Empirical evidence spanning thirty centuries should be informative.
Consider taking a different tack.
However, it’s a common belief in America that anyone can address any issue if they just talk to someone.
Does the US, however, continue to attempt to establish these channels of communication with the Foreign government? What if you tried a different technique or approach?
Like a hungry man, I have no doubt that the US will keep pleading with the PRC for new communication channels. & nbsp, When dealing with the Chinese, nothing good comes from appearing to be a supplicant. & nbsp,
If the Americans try a distinct strategy? Maybe. There doesn’t appear to be any form of self-deprecation against the Chinese that the US authorities will not attempt.
However, any US agent or official requesting communication and relationship with the PLA must be given a justification for how it will work( this moment ). And a monotonous response is,” Speech is always nice ,” which is very American. But it’s not a rational response.
Instead of engaging in song sessions with the Chinese, it is preferable to be more eager to prepare the US army for battle and victory. While the US is more interested in engaging and conversing, they have been preparing to fight.
Former US minister and retired US Marine official Grant Newsham. When China Attacks: A Caution To America was written by him.
JAPAN Forward previously published this article, and it is being republished with authority.
91 more Singapore-based companies allegedly sending supplies to Myanmar military
” VERY SERIOUSLY ,” GOVERNMENT TAKES ALLEGATIONS.
Dr. Balakrishnan stated in his written response that the update would only be temporary due to the ongoing investigations and that he & nbsp was asking the MPs for their input.
There were no evidence that specific weapons were being transferred to the Myanmar military in the UN report, he added, adding that the government was looking into certain details of the alleged” hands and related products” that were shipped to it through Singapore-based companies. & nbsp,
Instead, he claimed that only spare parts and equipment fell under the category of” arms ,” with no explanation of what these made up.
” Dual – use products” were among the other significant groups of items covered in the report, along with computers, electronic components, and medical products. Additionally,” production equipment ,” which covered things like steel beams and aluminum ingots as well as pipes and valves, was listed. This equipment also included welding supplies and overhead crane.
Members would understand from these descriptions that the items do not always qualify as” arms” or” weaponry” in the traditional sense, he said. Many of them, including computers and clinical supplies, are also out of control. It is challenging to separate particular cautious deals from quite broad categories.
According to Dr. Balakrishnan, the government takes the report” quite really” and has asked Mr. Andrews to provide specific and credible evidence to support efforts.
Nine of the identified institutions, according to him, are no longer recognized by Singapore’s Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority, making it impossible for them to conduct business or conduct legitimate business there.
According to Dr. Balakrishnan,” this includes entities that were supposedly involved in the exchange of parts and spare parts for fighter aircraft, products for the Myanmar Navy, as well as radios, study, and electronic warfare equipment.”
He continued by saying that the majority of the 47 companies that were originally identified no longer have business relationships with Singaporean lenders.
According to him,” The lenders will evaluate the remaining accounts and take appropriate action, including increased investigation, to ensure that these entities’ transactions are not suspicious.” Such actions may make it harder for them to carry on with any undesired business.
Dr. Balakrishnan added that because Myanmar is on the Financial Action Task Force’s list, financial institutions in Singapore have also been exercising increased due diligence for buyers and transactions associated with Myanmar that pose higher risks.
He noted that this includes the time frame mentioned in Mr. Andrews’ report, which is between February 2021 and December 2022, and said,” I would like to re-state flatly that the Singapore government has no conducted any military revenue to the Myanmar government in recent years.”
In fact, Mr. Andrews himself stated in his report that” there are no signs that the Singaporean government has approved or is involved in the sale of arms and related materials to the Myanmar military.”
The government may” continue to work closely and constructively with Mr. Andrews to find certain, verifiable, and where possible judge admissible data to improve our investigations ,” Dr. Balakrishnan continued.
He continued,” Let me reiterate that the government is still committed to carrying out our plan to stop the transfer of weapons and dual-use goods to Myanmar, where there is a significant chance that they could be used to harm unarmed civilians.”
” We will not be hesitant to take action against any person or thing that violates this.”
Cloudy with a chance of moon: Singapore photographers capture supermoon despite bad weather
Fourth time was the charm for Mr. Andy Chew, who regarded his attempt on Monday night — his fourth in four years — as his” most successful.” The 51-year-old’s earlier intentions had been derailed by inclement weather. & nbsp,
People likely remarked,” Nah, it’s another year of disappointment ,” today. However, I took a chance. Despite the numerous instances I’ve failed, I still wanted to try. Mr. Chew, who arrived at 6.30 p.m. with his lens and camera, said,” Better than nothing.”
He continued, explaining why he picked Marina Barrage as his scenery,” If you shoot the sun itself, it’s just like any other sky.”
In the end, Mr. Chew managed to get a picture of swooping across the sky in an attempt to simply get the rising moon just above the ships in the distance.
To decouple or to de-risk â that is the question
As is frequently the case in diplomacy, the communique that the G7 leaders released in May following their meeting in Hiroshima omitted a crucial question: What is the distinction between” de – risking ,” which it expressed approval of, and” decoupling ,” which it disapproved?
These words weren’t defined in the G7 speech. It didn’t even mention that China is the main target of both decoupling and de-risking. For you, that is politics.
The United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, and Italy’s officials merely stated that they were coordinating their strategies for economic resilience and economic protection” based on diversifying partnerships and de-risking, no decoupling.”
The ambiguity was deliberate, as is frequently the case in geopolitics. Distinctions between the US and some of its allies were quickly covered up. Economic resilience and” economic security” are diplo-speak terms for preventing an excessive reliance on China( and, to some extent, Russia ) for essential goods and avoiding providing those nations with strategically important technologies.
Dispersion, the term that was popular up until recently, appears to mean taking a deeper break from China than de-risking, according to the president of the European Commission. De-risking suggests diversifying, putting an end to the sole reliance on China, more than withdrawing.
But in reality, expansion has also played a significant role in the decoupling to date. The distinction between coupling and de-risking for statement purposes is semantics. Because of this, despite the fact that there are significant differences between the US and its supporters in regards to their reliance on China, they were able to agree to the statement.
These variations are a reflection of their various political circumstances, particularly with regard to Taiwan. The likelihood of a Chinese military assault on the island is growing, to the point where US officials must make preparations despite their best efforts to prevent it.
Friends of Washington don’t. Japan might, at least economically, support the US in the event of an attack. It is imprisoned by its geography and history. A China strike on Taiwan would be much less likely to be perceived as a difficulty by Western allies. They might be persuaded to join a coalition of the willing, but that is not inevitably going to happen.
Therefore, the US is more concerned about giving China military-strengthening technology. It is more concerned about China cutting off vital supplies during warfare.
Federal protection is more important to governments when they are making war plans than economic efficiency. Those who, like many exporting industries like farming, think that financial markets allocate money more effectively than governments and that free trade results in the best financial outcomes may find this difficult to swallow.
However, it explains why some Republican supporters of free markets supported industrial policy efforts put forth by the Biden administration. And why, in spite of warnings from US high-tech firms that restrictions may include long-term financial repercussions, Republicans are firmly behind the Biden administration’s stepped-up efforts to block export of the most advanced semiconductor technology to China.
Although they have some of the same worries about China as the US, Western nations are not nearly as concerned about national security. Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, has cautioned Europe not to become” caught up in problems that are not ours” in reference to Taiwan.
Europeans are unhappy with the high-tech grants and buy-American regulations of the Biden administration because they believe they are deterring purchase from them just as much as from China.
Some Europeans are also wary of US work to obstruct China’s exports of high-tech goods. However, the French government gradually joined the US in limiting French companies’ exports of the most cutting-edge semiconductor manufacturing machinery to China.
In conclusion, Europe prefers” de-risking” because it opposes the US’s desire for financial isolation from China. Because it is properly ambiguous to allow allies to march to various drummers, the Biden administration accepted” de – risking.”
In actuality, but is dissipating. US-China trade in goods set a document in 2022, as did US exports to China, despite all the talk of it over the past few years, the president’s industrial policy changes, export restrictions, and company disclosures of plans to move production up to the US or to Eastern countries other than China.
At$ 36.4 billion, US farming exports to China even broke a record for the fiscal year 2022.
Despite being competitors, National companies’ supply stores are firmly established in China. China is the US’s and approximately 120 other nations’ largest trading partner, including American allies like Japan, South Korea, and Germany.
In some product categories, such as drones and thermal panels, China holds a disproportionately large market share worldwide. It is also an essential provider of countless thousands of other products. China may undoubtedly stop exporting goods to the US in a battle, so it makes sense to reduce reliance on China.
Regardless of which political euphemism is used to identify it, it is unclear how much today’s supply chains can or will be untangled outside of war.
Urban Lehner, a longtime editor and correspondent for the Wall Street Journal Asia, is now the editor-emeritus of DTN / The Progressive Farmer. & nbsp,
Copyright 2023 DTN / The Progressive Farmer is the title of this article, which was first released on July 3 by the latter news organization and is now being republished with authority by Asia Times. All right are reserved. Urban Lehner follows @ urbanize on Twitter.