Was Jesus Palestinian? – Asia Times
The name figure and her father Joseph are being played by Jewish players, so the approaching biblical film from Netflix, Mary, has received criticism on social media.
The criticisms are based on the argument that Mary and Joseph, and their son Jesus, a Jewish man born in Bethlehem, were, in fact, Palestinian. Some critics of the Netflix casting are concerned that Israeli actors portraying Palestinians as historical figures while Israeli bombs kill contemporary Palestinians.
According to director D J. Caruso, it was important for us to select Israeli actors in order to ensure authenticity while selecting the majority of our main cast members.
So, were Jesus and his parents Palestinian?
Bethlehem is now a city located in the Israeli-occupied West Bank of the Palestinian Territories, about ten kilometers south of Jerusalem. So the short answer is: yes, Jesus was a Palestinian, according to modern geopolitics at least.
One could also argue that he was n’t Jewish and was born in a political vacuum before Palestine.
Paula Fredriksen, a historian of ancient Christianity, made this point in March. She described Jesus ‘ claims as” an act of cultural and political appropriation” in the Washington Post.
A Jewish man from Bethlehem
According to the New Testament, Jesus was born somewhere around 4-6 BCE during the reign of Herod the Great, in Bethlehem. Bethlehem’s location was in an area then known by the Romans as Judea – the land of Judah, then occupied by the Jewish people ( the Judeans ).
The Roman historian Tacitus was the first to mention the existence of Jesus as a Judean, outside of the New Testament, in his Annales ( 115-120 CE).
According to Tacitus, the Christians were to blame for the fire that destroyed Rome in 64 CE, as the Emperor Nero had predicted. They were named, he wrote, after ( Jesus )” Christus”, who was executed by Pontius Pilate when he was governor of” Judea, the first source of the evil”.
According to the Old Testament, the 12 tribes of Israel conquered Canaan ( later to become known as Palestine, then Judea, then Palestine, and then Israel ) around 1200 BCE. In the area south of Jerusalem, the tribe of Judah made its home.
This made Jesus a Judean ( in Hebrew, a Yehudi), from which the English word” Jew” is derived. As a Judean, Jesus was part of the Jewish religious tradition, which was focused on the temple in Jerusalem, known as the second temple.
‘ Palestine’ has a long history
The name” Palestine” for that region also had a long history, though. It first appeared in the writings of Herodotus, a Greek historian, in the fifth century BCE.
He wrote of a “district of Syria, called Palaistinê”, between Egypt and Phoenicia, an ancient region that corresponds to modern Lebanon, with adjoining parts of modern Syria and Israel. So, the land ( or part of it ) was called” Palestine” by the Greeks before it was called” Judea” by the Romans.
The Bar Kokhba revolt, which dates from 132-135 CE, was a pivotal period in the creation of Palestine. The Jews were killed, displaced or enslaved. They did n’t start relocating to Palestine until after World War II, when Israel became a Jewish state.
The Emperor Hadrian changed the name of the Roman province from” Judea” to” Palestinian Syria” in c. 138 CE. The region’s Jewish identity was removed by this name change, which implied that it was more Syrian and Greek than Jewish.
We might say that from this moment on, Jesus was a Palestinian.
His religious affiliation to the Jewish religion and his ethnicity both had changed, but his location had also. The Judean had become a Palestinian.
Back then, this mattered little. After all, Palestine was just another name for Judea.
Politicizing” Palestine” and” Israel”
After the fall of the Roman Empire, the boundaries of Palestine were vague and uncertain. ” Palestine” did not refer to any specific political identity, so no precise geographical determination was needed.
The crusaders preferred” the Holy Land”, or” the Kingdom of Jerusalem”. Up until the end of the first world war, Ottoman dominance over the region was overthrown, Palestine’s borders remained ambiguous until it joined the Ottoman Empire in 1516.
British and Allied forces seized Jerusalem in December 1917. The British would continue to rule Palestine until a mandated end date in 1948, and the area was already occupied by them by October 1918. In May 1948, after an estimated 750, 000 people who lived on 77.8 % of the land in then-Palestine were displaced, the modern state of Israel was declared.
Palestine’s historic geography has since come back as crucial. Prior to the establishment of the new state of Israel, Palestine would now be defined as a constrained, determined geographical space.
This new state built upon its original Judean, or Jewish identity. But with its new name, it created a new understanding of itself. A new kind of Jew, an” Israeli”, had arrived in the place formerly known as Judea.
The new Jewish” Israelis” established themselves against the previous inhabitants, the” Palestinians”. According to the Bible, they restricted the Palestinians ‘ access to the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, which the Israelis still believed to be the Promised Land that God had given them.
The Arabs of Palestine, for their part, began to use the term” Palestinian” to defend the nationalism of the Palestinian people and their right to an independent state.
A common humanity
Jesus could be both a Palestinian and a Judaean when Palestine and Judaea shared essentially the same geographical area. Back then, it did n’t matter.
He can no longer be both in a modern Middle East that is divided along binary lines ( between Jew and Arab, Israeli Jew and Palestinian Muslim or Christian ).
From all of this, Jesus is the only one who knows. However, we should be questioned about the validity and significance of such binary distinctions once we realize that Jesus is both a Jew and a Palestinian.
After all, Jews, Muslims and Christians believe we all come from one original pair of humans: Adam and Eve.
Beyond the arbitrary and impermanent divisions of people and places created by the changes and chances of history, that story leads us to a recognition of common humanity.
Philip C. Almond is emeritus professor in the history of religious thought, The University of Queensland
The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Arrest warrants issued for Dr Boon, eight others in fraud case
The home of the THG leader are still close.
PUBLISHED: 23 Nov 2024 at 13: 26
Dr. Boon Vanasin, the founder of Thonburi Healthcare Group ( THG), and eight others have been arrested on suspicion of public fraud and money laundering. While six people were arrested, Dr Boon has fled worldwide.
The Metropolitan Police Bureau ( MPB) on Friday obtained court approval for the arrests, including those of Dr Boon, 86, his wife Jaruwan, 79, and their daughter Nalin, 51.  , They are accused of misleading persons into investing in health organizations. The doctor is also alleged to possess forged his former daughter-in-law’s name to secure a product, resulting in damage estimated at 7.5 , billion baht.
The criminal justice granted Dr. Boon’s arrest warrant in response to allegations of collusion with public money laundering, false borrowing, and poor check violations. The other defendants were charged in a similar manner. 527 concerns about Dr. Boon were filed at the Huai Khwang police station between December and October by survivors who were unable to cash the checks he issued.
Between Feb 2 and 4, Dr Boon apparently built trust by promoting five medical-related tasks, including a cancer centre and medical advancements in Thailand and other countries, to get investments. Preliminary interest payments were made, but later bills were omitted, which caused problems with the owners ‘ checks.
As studies continue, six offenders have been apprehended, while Dr Boon, his wife, and daughter remain at large, with the THG founder having apparently fled on Sept 29.
On Friday, police in Nonthaburi detained two ladies for common fraud and unauthorized loans. They were alleged people of Dr Boon Vanasin’s system. ( Photo: Metropolitan Police Bureau’s IDMB Facebook )
On Friday, authorities arrested two people linked to Dr Boon’s system at a law firm in Bang Bua Thong area, Nonthaburi. Additionally, they were accused of defrauding the people and borrowing money. Authorities identified them just as 38-year-old Siriwimol and Jidapha, 53.  , Seized from them was a Mercedes Benz.
Theeradet Thammasuthee, the head of the MPB’s Investigation Division, claimed that the fraud case had caused a lot of harm because some victims had been duped into investing with Dr. Boon.
US, Israel not winning their war on Yemen – Asia Times
On November 14, 2023, a fortnight into Israel’s murderous assault on the Palestinians in Gaza, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, one of the rulers of Ansar Allah and of the state of Yemen, delivered a discourse that was broadcast on Al-Masirah broadcast.
He said,” We keep an eye on any Israeli ship while it is constantly being looked for.” ” The enemy relies on camouflage in its movement in the Red Sea, especially in Bab al-Mandab, and]does ] not dare to raise Israeli flags on its ships”.
The Bab al-Mandab, the Gate of Grief, is the 14-nautical-mile vast lake between Djibouti and Yemen. What is exciting is that, by United Nations convention, a state claims 12 nautical miles as its regional control, this means a huge part of the lakes are within Yemen’s control.
Five days later, Yemeni soldiers flew in a helicopter over the cargo ship Galaxy Leader, which is partly owned by Abraham Ungar ( one of Israel’s wealthiest men ), but is registered in the Bahamas and runs by the Chinese NYK transport line.
The ship continues to be held within Yemen’s regional waters in the harbor of Saleef, with its 25 staff members as captives in Al-Hudaydah governorate. This abuse on Galaxy Leader, and then on some other Israeli-owned arteries, halted the transportation of goods to the Port of Eliat, which sits at the end of the Gulf of Aqaba.
This port, which squeezes between Egypt and Jordan and is the only port in the Mediterranean Sea that allows Israel to access the Mediterranean Sea, is no longer capable of handling cargo ships, and the port’s personal operator has declared it to be about bankrupt.
The port has been the target of drone and missile attacks from Bahrain, Iraq, and Yemen over the course of the previous year.
US strikes hardly working
If Israel stopped its murderous war against the Palestinians, Yemen’s government said it would refrain from attacking. Since the Israeli invasion continues, Yemen’s problems have also continued.
These Yemeni problems have resulted in numerous attack on Yemen’s now unstable infrastructure, including frequent American missile strikes and Jewish strikes on Yemen’s port town of Hodeidah in July.
When US President Joe Biden was asked if the US strikes and weapon strikes on Oman were working, he answered frankly:” When you say’ working,’ are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Indeed”.
In other words, Yemen’s government, mistakenly called the Houthis after the Zaydi history of Islam, is still attacking Israel despite US and Israeli pressure.
The Zaydi group, the Ansar Allah movements, and the Yemeni government are among the Yemenis who are most opposed to the Jewish holocaust. Yet Tawakkol Karman, who received the Nobel Prize for Peace in 2011 and is a writer of the Yemeni state, has been outspoken in her criticism of Israel.
Biden was correct in saying that US missile strikes wo n’t stop Yemen from attacking. Saudi Arabia bombarded Yemen from 2015 to 2023, killing a lot of the country’s system.
The Yemenis continue to fire at Jewish target despite this. In October 2024, the US defense deployed B-2 Spirit aircraft to reach what the Pentagon called, “five underwater goals”.
Although it was unclear whether these arms stores had been destroyed, it does indicate how desperate Israel and the US are to prevent the Yemeni attacks. The names of the US missions ( OPE Poseidon Archer and OP Prosperity Guardian ) sound intriguing.
A number of ship strike organizations that work to defend Israel and to reach Yemen as well as those that work to stop Israel’s genocide are supporting them. At least 40 000 US soldiers are stationed in the Middle East, and at least one ship strike party can be found using ships and aircraft carriers at once.
As USS Abraham Lincoln departs from the Pacific Ocean, the US Navy reports that there are two destroyers en route to the Mediterranean Sea ( USS Bulkeley and USS Arleigh Burke ) and two in the Red Sea ( USS Cole and USS Jason Dunham ), both of which are anchored by the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman.
In the area surrounding Israel, US weapons is present.
A social alternative
Biden is not the only one who claims that the US’s strikes on Yemen were futile. US Vice Admiral George Wikoff, who leads Operation Prosperity Guardian, addressed an market in Washington, DC from his office in Bahrain in August.
According to Wikoff, the United States is unable to “find a central center of gravity” for Yemenis, which would mean putting forth” a typical punishment policy.” If the United States ca n’t stop the Yemeni government’s leadership from attacking Israeli shipping and infrastructure, then it ca n’t stop the attacks.
According to Wikoff,” We have undoubtedly degraded their capability,” in reference to the US weapons ‘ robots and weapons. Wikoff did not mention that US missiles and drones used by Yemeni soldiers cost about US$ 2, 000, whereas US weapons used to shoot them down charge US$ 2 million.
In the end, Yemenis may be responsible for degrading the US military ( the Wall Street Journal reported in October that the US is running out of air-defense missiles, and the same newspaper reported in June that the US has spent$ 1 billion on its war on Yemen since October 2023 ).
Like Biden, Wikoff reflected:” Have we stopped them? No”. In an intriguing away, Wikoff said,” The answer is not going to come at the end of a weapon system”.
The only thing Israel can do is put an end to its murder, according to the Yemeni government. But yet a ceasefire might not be enough. In early November, the United Nations national Louise Wateridge posted a video on X of the loneliness in northeastern Gaza, and therefore wrote,” An whole world now a cemetery”.
If Israel continues to pursue its improper policies of murder, ethnic cleansing, and segregation, the Yemeni government’s capacity to halt shipping to Israel and impose sanctions on the country off its coast might encourage it to do so.
Both Wikoff and Biden both acknowledge that the US policy has n’t worked, and Wikoff even claimed that using military force will be the answer. It will have to be social.
Globetrotter provided the content for this article, which is now republished with authority.
Vijay Prashad is an American writer, director, and journalist. He is a writing brother and chief editor at Globetrotter. He is an director of LeftWord Books and the producer of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.
He has written more than 20 publications, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest ebooks are On Cuba: Views on 70 Times of Revolution and Struggle, Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Actions for Socialism, and ( with Noam Chomsky ) The Removal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of US Power.
Laos government ‘profoundly saddened’ by tourist deaths from suspected methanol poisoning
Since Laos ‘ communist rulers first opened the nation to tourists decades ago, Vang Vieng has become a fixture on the Southeast Asian traveller path. The city was previously associated with bad behavior among travelers at forest parties, but it has since been rebranded as an eco-tourism hotspot. The LaosContinue Reading
The nations likely to win, not lose, from Trump’s tariffs – Asia Times
Donald Trump’s returning to the White House brings with it the high possibility of renewed taxes, a basis of his” America First” plan.
While his critics see isolationism, others see an opportunity—an extreme method to balance global trade and defend American manufacturing. Trump’s taxes, however, are likely to have a far-reaching impact beyond US borders, opening up new opportunities for nations that are ready to step up and fill the void.
For , Vietnam,  , India,  , Mexico,  , Malaysia and , Thailand, Trump’s method could be a game-changer. As businesses intensify diversification efforts and change supply chains away from China, these countries stand to gain from the world realignment that may result from fresh tariffs.
These nations was experience unprecedented financial transformation if Trump builds on his earlier successes with a more sophisticated technique.
1. Vietnam: Trade battle success
Some countries capitalized on Trump’s 2018-19 trade war with China as efficiently as Vietnam. As American levies hit Chinese goods, companies scrambled to travel production, and Vietnam immediately became a major target. Its low labor costs, corporate closeness to China, and robust US trade agreements made it a good choice.
If Trump reinstates taxes, Vietnam could once again draw companies who want to avoid China’s higher costs. From technology to fabric, its import basic is well-prepared to meet British demand. Trump’s demonstrated willingness to negotiate individual business agreements may strengthen Vietnam’s standing as a preferred partner.
2. India: a proper alliance
Trump’s second term saw a strengthening of US-India relationships, driven by a shared need to counter China. His leadership improved trade and established security partnerships, giving India a significant role as a regional ally.
India’s growing producing center and focus on self-reliance—championed through its” Make in India” initiative—align completely with Trump’s focus on reducing US dependency on China. Trump’s support for bilateral agreements might help India stable trade agreements that support its emerging industries, such as medicine and electronics.
Under Trump, India may grow not just financially but carefully, more merging into US-led efforts to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific.
3. Mexico: the descriptions superstar
Mexico was one of the biggest beneficiaries of Trump’s first-term taxes. His renewal of NAFTA into the USMCA boosted American firms ‘ ability to link their supply chains more closely while providing a stable platform for business. Mexico’s geographical closeness and cost-competitive work marketplace gave it a healthy advantage.
If Trump renews tariffs on Chinese imports, Mexico’s part as a descriptions hotspot will only increase. With streamlined logistics and lower travel costs, industries like electrical manufacturing and customer goods are likely to grow even further.
Trump’s border laws, though provocative, are unlikely to outweigh the monetary dependence between the US and Mexico.
4. Malaysia: a high-tech lover
Malaysia is truly positioned to benefit from Trump’s focus on cutting-edge business. It is a significant player in the global technical supply chain because of its expertise in manufacturing electronics and technology.
Malaysia became a focal point for businesses looking to reduce their reliance on Chinese manufacturers in delicate business both during Trump’s second word and as Biden did thereafter. If Trump reinstates taxes on Chinese tech materials, Malaysia’s advanced manufacturing industry may see a surge in demand.
Trump’s administration had more incentivize US expense in Malaysia, solidifying it as a trusted companion.
5. Thailand: the dynamic candidate
Thailand is a good winner thanks to its varied economy and robust manufacturing base. Its advantages in automotive manufacturing, technology, and agricultural exports fit well with US business needs.
Thailand benefited directly from the trade war as businesses looked for alternatives to China during Trump’s second term. A second round of tariffs may enhance its role in supply ring growth, particularly if Trump pursues diplomatic trade agreements. Thailand’s ability to balance relationships with both the US and China may be important in maximizing these options.
Why Trump’s strategy may work
Trump’s reviewers often paint his business plans as problematic, but the information suggests they have spurred long-term adjustments that benefit international business dynamics. Trump accelerated shifts that are now required for economic resilience by requiring a reevaluation of China’s centrality in supply chains.
For countries like Vietnam, India and Mexico, Trump’s unapologetic focus on tariffs created openings that might never have emerged under more conventional leadership. His potential return gives these countries a chance to strengthen ties with the US, draw investment, and secure a larger share of global trade.
The balancing act
Of course, the risks remain. Trump’s transactional style and steadfast pursuit of success may rekindle tensions, especially if tariff disputes or trade imbalances arise. But these five countries have shown they can adapt to volatility, leveraging Trump’s bold moves to their advantage.
If Trump learns from the lessons of his first term, refining his strategy to focus on sustained partnerships, his return could usher in a new era of economic collaboration. For Vietnam, India, Mexico, Malaysia and Thailand, the opportunity is immense.
As Trump reshapes global trade, these nations are well-positioned to rise alongside America’s renewed economic ambitions.
Kurt Davis Jr., a Council on Foreign Relations member, is a Millennium Fellow at the Atlantic Council. He is also an advisor to private, public and state-owned , companies and their boards as well as creditors across the globe on a range of transactions.
Intelligence sharing doesn’t necessarily mean policy alignment – Asia Times
Pacific Forum published this article at its original publication. It is republished with authority.
Japan and New Zealand announced in June 2024 that the two countries had come to terms on an data protection arrangement.  , While information on the specific characteristics of the contract are yet to be published, it might be safe to assume that this is a step toward further bilateral security assistance, given New Zealand ‘s , increasingly vigilant approach , to the emerging , regional security infrastructure.
However, it’s crucial to remember that sharing intelligence does n’t always translate to aligning security policies.
The , New Zealand Intelligence Community consists of three organizations:
- the Cabinet and Prime Minister’s Office’s National Assessment Bureau is responsible for assessing brains.
- the New Zealand Intelligence Security Services ( SIS ) for domestic security intelligence, and
- the Bureau of Signals Intelligence, part of the government connections and safety.
New Zealand has increased its activities in Asia, particularly since the UK joined the European Union, as pointed out by both , academics , and , experts. New Zealand has always maintained its place among the Five Eyes society, even though it retreated from the US and Australia’s 1951 ANZUS Treaty in the 1980s.
The states ‘ monthly summits and ministerial meetings are a key part of the Five Eyes framework’s institutional strengths, which coordinate their positions, set their goals, and share ideas. They also co-ordinate their positions, and share ideas.
Despite their differing viewpoints, the New Zealand government often deviates from the conversation of other member nations. A new and striking case had been 2021, when New Zealand , stepped back , from involvement in joint denunciation against China’s treatment of its Uighur Muslim minority by the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia.
This is especially at conflict with the fact that the Five Eyes group just recently declared , a more expanded relationship , with another member states to include the political sphere.
Therefore, a question: What enables cleverness sharing to help to plan alignment?
Intelligence-sharing systems and agreements usually develop shared viewpoints. Similar types of analysis on comparable details, which have resulted in comparable opinions in various countries, have contributed, and have gained more knowledge that one’s partners also have comparable conclusions.
Establishing such mechanisms second requires acknowledging shared safety concerns and fostering trust in the companion nation’s handling of sensitive information.
Although we can conclude that these agreements will benefit both parties, the existence of an intelligence-sharing system does not always mean that the participants ‘ regional security policies will be in line with one another.
Policymakers , with cleverness assessment inputs – no intelligence companies themselves – generally participate in policymaking. Therefore, policy will depend on how eloquently the intelligence agencies ‘ risk assessments affect policymakers ‘ attitudes.
Bisher, it seems as though New Zealand’s intelligence services and local politics have had little effect on the political landscape. In comparison to more effective institutions in another Five Eyes nations, the intelligence role is also constrained, and their influence is less developed.
However, within New Zealand culture there is also lingering suspicion of the region’s intelligence agencies originating from the , Kim Dotcom incident, in which the agencies supposedly conducted unlawful surveillance of the accused.
Similar to other Five Eyes nations, New Zealand’s intelligence companies have since made more effort to improve their public relations and communication skills. But, just in 2023 did New Zealand publish , a risk assessment report, with the following of its kind coming in first September 2024.
Although these more common engagements will have a greater impact on policy, their discussion is not entirely in line with that of other government agencies. For example, New Zealand’s intelligence agencies described the People’s Republic of China as generally framed as New Zealand’s and its traditional security partners ‘ corporate competitors. This seems to be a variation from New Zealand’s standard approach.
David Capie, a leading New Zealand professor,  , described , it as a shock to the earlier New Zealand institutions that have spent much of the past decade rejecting perfectly that frame. He also noted and appreciated the significance of the SIS’s recognition that, in addition to being proper competitors, it also comes from apparently friendly nations, particularly in light of Five Eyes ‘ suspicions of India.
The American government was first accused by the American state of organizing Hardeep Singh Nijjar’s death in June 2023. In October 2023, New Zealand joined another Five Eyes nations in condemning New Delhi for threatening to formally withdraw American officials ‘ protections and immunity unless Ottawa reduced the number of delegations it had in India.
The question is whether these intelligence agencies ‘ attitudes, which are more in tune with their traditional surveillance partners, will eventually result in actual and consistent plan alignment.
The risk assessment report states that it is not a federal policy record but rather an independent assessment by the SIS, which is one caveat to answering this question. This is unusual because the New Zealand government is responsible for the publication of the report. What should this be understood as? Any corporate report must be reviewed and approved by senior government officials and political decision-makers, according to the standard operating procedure for federal papers. The key players in the state are typically essential people, not all politicians and government officials, according to the argument. So, we ask what made the Sisters include such a disclaimer.
According to my understanding, there was no discussion among the New Zealand government before the release. On page 14, the report states that it does not want to securitize some ethnic communities, but other topics might warrant discussion. Another cause could be that New Zealand officials are generally , skeptical , of intelligence firms, which made it difficult to get the natural light from senior officials to challenge the record as the government’s official status.
The recent SIS security assessment’s analysis serves as one more instance of how the views of New Zealand intelligence agencies have been accepted in the wider domestic policy community. The New Zealand intelligence agencies have less influence on the current Luxon government’s foreign policy and its alignment with its Five Eyes counterparts because of a relatively underdeveloped intelligence community and a low level of confidence in the policy/political community.
There is still work to be done, despite Japan and New Zealand’s intelligence cooperation offering both opportunities: more information on North Korea and China in Japan’s and New Zealand’s cases.
In order to maintain democratic control over the government, it is crucial to establish an oversight mechanism in both the parliament and the government as intelligence agencies venture into uncharted territory regarding cooperation. The scope and authority of the intelligence agencies must be enshrined in law for them to function properly, or even be established, and after that, political authorities can carry out appropriate supervision.
Japan currently lacks proper intelligence agency governance and will benefit greatly from an established, organized, and official agency with oversight. In order to bridge the gap between the intelligence agencies, on the one hand, and the government and the public, New Zealand will gain more public trust by including former intelligence officials in its oversight committee.
Rei Koga ( rei. koga@kcl .ac. uk ), a PhD student in international political economy at the Department of European and International Studies, King’s College London, is a WSD-Handa research fellow at Pacific Forum.
Among Trump advisors, a battle for GOP’s soul rages – Asia Times
As a business who loves offers, Donald Trump may be overjoyed with all the free tips he’s getting as president-elect.
In the times between the vote and the opening of a new leader, would-be advisors appear. They demand that this campaign promises be kept, rather than that one. They advocate carrying out specific strategy promises to the maximum or minimum. They suggest which of the counterpart’s procedures may get continued and which axed.
All this happens with any approaching leader. Due to the ongoing fight for the Republican Party’s core, it is happening frequently with Trump. Oversimplified, it’s a battle between the conservatism of Ronald Reagan and what some visit Big Government conservative.
The essential principles of Reagan conservative include tax breaks, small government, restructuring, free business and a skeletal foreign policy. Some Trump liberals are friendly to immigration, though firmly opposed to illegal immigration.
As the name implies, Big Government conservatism is n’t about shrinking the government, but about making it work harder for American workers. More Americans should be given high-paying work and the middle school to return, with particular attention.
According to its supporters, sealed borders mean that both legal and illegal immigrants are dependent on both legal and illegal immigrants, which would only raise the wages of native-born Americans who would otherwise be able to fill those positions with more lucrative pay. For the same purpose, big-government conservatives believe that taxes promote manufacturing work.
Like Reagan liberals, the big-government liberals tend to favor restructuring. Economic legislation in certain puts energy-industry jobs at hazard, in their perspective.
Unsurprisingly, they approve of the Democrats ‘ push to pass the Network and Chips Act subsidies for new businesses. They’d maintain that industrial plan, maybe even increase it.
Big government does n’t mean big Pentagon. These conservatives dislike cheap overseas war. Home revival is their goal.
Although Donald Trump may have long since distanced himself from Reagan conservative, his two most significant accomplishments in his first term, tax cuts and restructuring, were straight out of the Reagan playbook. Even though Elon Musk might not be off to it, he has accused him of shrinking the state.
From Big Government conservative, Trump has chosen isolationism, closed borders and foreign-policy caution. How far should taxes and closed borders be concerned, as well as whether new businesses should continue receiving industrial-policy subsidies, are two questions that prospective advisors are trying to control.
Tariffs
The President-elect has promised big new tariffs – as much as 20 % on all incoming goods except Chinese imports, which he’d hit with a 60 % tariff. He’s getting a lot of tips to be more restricted.
Companies and economists are warning consumers that they will experience a fresh wave of prices. Agriculture and other exporting nations are concerned about buying companion reprisals. According to Aaron Friedberg, tariffs against China wo n’t work unless they are coordinated with other, China-fearing governments.
Robert Lighthizer, the US deal representative in Trump’s second name who is said to be Trump’s selection as business” king” in this one, is highly pro-tariff. But he’s also a realist.
Higher taxes are a clarity. It’s also unclear how wide and how great.
Closed edges
It may be challenging to implement the massive arrests of illegal immigrants that member Trump promised. Thousands of them exist, and many of them have been working in the sector for centuries. A lot more border-control officials would need to be hired to round them off.
The flow of new fugitives will definitely be stopped by a Trump administration that is stronger than it was in the past. Any person who has been found guilty of a crime or has received a deportation order from a prosecutor will likely be deported. It’s hard to believe the persecution will be huge, though. If they are, they may tremendously destroy the economy.
Industrial coverage
Trump dislikes the grants, but many of them are already building. In the legislative districts where those companies are being built, many of which are red says, it would be a vote-loser to ban them.
Could he be persuaded by big-government liberals to support him in more ways? It does n’t seem likely. However, JD Vance has a great lover in Donald Trump Jr., whose views seem to have a bearing on his father, and he leans toward the huge government side.
Setting up a review committee of withdrew generals and admirals to weed out serving three- and four-star military officials is one of the worst recommendations the president-elect is receiving. Trump, who viewed commitment as the top priority in his first word with officers who believed their commitment to the Constitution, is undoubtedly drawn to the idea.
An ignorant or disobedient agent has the power to sack them as president. However, it’s a terrible idea to conduct a fidelity check for a particular politician. Officials may be promoted on the basis of significance, not politicians.
Urban Lehner, a former Wall Street Journal Asia journalist and writer, is DTN/The Progressive Farmer’s editor emeritus.  ,
This , content, originally published on November 20 by the latter media business and then republished by Asia Times with authority, is © Copyright 2024 DTN, LLC. All rights reserved.  ,  , Follow , Urban Lehner , on X @urbanize.
CNA wins best News Explainer at AIB Awards in London for video on Israel-Gaza war
SINGAPORE: For its in-depth look at the , Israeli occupation of the West Bank, CNA was honoured at this , year’s AIBs, an international awards competition organised by the London-based , Association for International Broadcasting ( AIB ).
CNA’s” Israel-Hamas War- The Occupation Of West Bank”  , came out heads in the News Explainer type in the movie section, beating competition from Bloomberg, CNN as well as Al Jazeera, which even submitted its own explanation on the Israel-Hamas battle.  ,
It was one of two prizes picked up by CNA, which is an English language , Eastern news channel based in Singapore.
The award ceremony, which took place in London on Friday  , ( Nov 22 ), was hosted by CNA presenter Otelli Edwards. Entry forms are submitted by well-known news outlets around the world.  ,  ,
CNA’s winning entrance was the , next event of an eight-part set on the Israel-Hamas conflict that began on Oct 7, 2023. The first episode of the series was in January of this year.  ,
” Israel-Hamas War- The Occupation Of West Bank” shows the effect of Jewish inhabitants on Palestinians, and looks at the structure of Jewish settlements and the crime between settlers and Palestinians.  ,
The show also examines the impact of the conflict on Palestinians ‘ daily life.
The line looked at many other aspects of the conflict, including tracing the hostilities since the 1917 Balfour Declaration, past attempts at peace, what happened on Oct 7 next year, who is Hamas, whether foreign legislation has been violated and the position of Iran.  ,
In the process of production, the CNA group interviewed 40 people of a few different nationalities comprising academics, former officials, former United Nations rapporteurs, support staff, and persons living in the West Bank. It even examined , more than 200 documents from files dating back to the 1900s from different countries.
The eight-part film set on the Israel-Hamas battle, which CNA published on YouTube, is the most significant and difficult news explainer we have ever produced, according to Mediacorp Editor-in-Chief Walter Fernandez.
” It took a group of 10 producers and suffered senior , editors more than three months to do the research, cause images, produce graphics as well as modify the scripts and videos.
The historical and political context surrounding the horrifying attack by Hamas and Israel was better understood thanks to this explainer series, CNA’s local, regional, and global audiences. Explainers like this one, conducted professionally and objectively, demonstrate the continued relevance and worth of public service media like CNA.
The CNA entry did a great job, according to the AIB judges, were pleased with the footage and effective use of maps, and the production thoroughly examined the West Bank situation.
It painted a vivid picture of the people’s lives in the area. They claimed that the episode had a logical flow and was presented in a simple manner, which is what a news explainer should do.
A fashion shoot that went viral and turned Indian slum children into celebrities
Innovation for ChangeSurprisingly, a group of poor schoolchildren were transformed into nearby celebrities after a video of a style shoot in India went viral.
The kids are depicted in red and gold clothes made of old clothes, the majority of them women, between the age of 12 and 17.
The teenagers created their own fashions, customizing the outfits, and using their creations as models to show off their creations, with the slum’s dirty walls and terraces serving as the setting for their stairway walk.
The movie was filmed and edited by a 15-year-old son.
Innovation for ChangeThe film initially appeared earlier this month on the Lucknow-based organization Innovation for Change’s Instagram website.
The charity works with about 400 babies from the city’s neighborhoods, providing them completely food, education and career skills. This NGO’s kids are the children that were featured in the photo shoot.
One of the designs in the picture, Mehak Kannojia, claimed that she and other students frequently redid their Instagram looks after seeing the stylish choices of Bollywood actresses.
” This moment, we decided to share our sources and worked as a group,” the 16-year-old said.
For their project, they chose wisely – a campaign by Sabyasachi Mukherjee, one of India’s top fashion designers who has dressed Bollywood celebrities, Hollywood actresses and billionaires. In 2018, Kim Kardashian wore his sequinned red sari for a Vogue shoot.
Mukherjee is also known as the “king of weddings” in India. He has dressed thousands of brides, including Bollywood celebrities such as Anushka Sharma and Deepika Padukone. Priyanka Chopra married Nick Jonas in a stunning red Sabyasachi outfit.
Innovation for ChangeMehak said their project, called Yeh laal rang ( the colour red ), was inspired by the designer’s heritage bridal collection.
We sifted through all the dark things that had been donated to us. Then we began putting the clothing up and made our first choices. “
The women worked on about a hundred clothing in three days, but according to Mehak, they had “great joy doing it.”
Mehak claims that they carefully copied the concepts ‘ movements from Sabyasachi videos for the corridor move.
” Only like his types, some of us wore glasses, one drank from a spritzer with a straw, while another walked carrying a fabric bag under her arm. “
Some of it, Mehak says, came up naturally. ” At one stage in the shoot, I was supposed to grin. At that moment, someone said something amusing and I only burst out laughing. “
Innovation for ChangeIt was an ambitious job, but the effect has won hearts in India. The film, which was produced with money from a friend and included some donated clothing, became popular after Mukherjee shared it on his Instagram page with a heart icon.
The battle won popular praise, with many on social advertising comparing their function to that of professionals.
The charity’s school has been visited by many TV programs, some of the children were invited to participate in shows on well-known FM radio stations, and Bollywood artist Tamannah Bhatia visited them to give them a blanket.
The response, Mehak says, has been” totally unexpected”.
It resembles a true dream. You’ve become famous, all of my friends are saying in the video. When my parents learned how much attention we were receiving, they were thrilled.
” We are feeling wonderful. Now we have only one dream left- to meet Sabyasachi. “
Innovation for ChangeSome people were critical of the shoot, though, and they wondered if showing young brides dressed as brides might encourage child marriage in a nation where millions of girls are still married off by their families before turning 18, the legal age.
In a post on Instagram, The Innovation for Change stated that they had no intention of encouraging child marriage.
Our goal is to in no way encourage child marriage. These girls are able to accomplish this by challenging such ideas and restrictions today. Please take them seriously; otherwise, these kids ‘ morale will suffer. “
This surgeon is saving women’s lives and the earth: ‘We can’t be healthy if the world we live in is not healthy’
Old operating theatre boots that are still accessible are washed, to later be used by tourists such as suppliers handling tools, customer surgeons or observers like students and trainees, who need to wear clogs for infection-control purposes.
Worn-out boots are dropped into the patient’s textile recycling bin. Used clothing or sacks in good condition can be disposed of in this bin at SKH’s Green Corner on Level 1 for generosity, employees, patients, and guests. Since its launch in January 2023, the doctor has donated 8, 804 kilograms of fabric.
For 20 % of celebration catering and all meals served by the operating theatre staff, SKH uses washable items. The amount of garbage in disposable bento boxes has been reduced from three to four bags per dinner service time.
The patient’s food waste digester method is one of its biggest sustainability initiatives. Food waste, according to Associate Professor Tan, makes up 11 % of Singapore’s complete waste. And, with 4, 500 foods prepared regularly at the hospital, about 13, 800 pounds of food spend was generated regular in 2023.
Food spend tanks installed in the kitchen’s core area transform food into waste. Because it can then be washed down the drain, spend sent for burning is significantly reduced. Not only is it environmentally friendly, it even improves hygiene and cleanliness, while reducing taste and pest problems.
Food safety is also enhanced by minimising cross-contamination risks, as kitchen staff do n’t need to handle the food waste digester.
THE BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACH
Instilling a society of conservation has been the code to the patient’s success, said Assoc Prof Tan.
” Our commission looks at big ticket items – such as the timing of our lights, when to increase the aircon warmth and how we can recycle things– but when it comes to what’s in each division, it’s the people who work there who see it best”, said the 53-year-old.
Assoc Prof Tan also serves as co-chair on the Committee on Sustainability ( CoS ) in Sing Health. She claimed that while the overall healthcare sector harbors some skepticism about sustainability, “it is mainly due to a lack of awareness of what we can do and how we can alter – and this is not only in care.”
” In the last two decades, there has been a deliberate work as a medical team to do more”, she said.