Jumping aboard the small-modular-reactor bandwagon – Asia Times

Worldwide, SMRs and AMRs have a growing fan base.

SMRs are described by the International Atomic Energy Agency as “modern nuclear units with a power output of up to 300 MWe [megawatts energy ] per unit, which is roughly one-third of traditional nuclear power reactors ‘ generating capacity.”

SMRs may be installed on sites that are not suitable for larger nuclear power plants, whereas prefabricated models of Biomarkers can be produced and then shipped and installed on site, which should increase their cost effectiveness. Due to its lower electronic output, an SMR can be installed inside an existing network or electronically off-grid. Biomarkers are regarded as being safer and less expensive.

Around the world, over 80 commercial SMR designs are currently being developed, focusing on various outputs and different programs, including light, cross power systems, heating, water desalinization, and steam for commercial software. These include a wide range of diverse reactor technology, from those that are based on smaller, more sophisticated compressed water reactor designs to the much more sophisticated hot water units and quick units.

While some of these styles are being developed by well-established nuclear companies, frequently with government support, others are being proposed by start-up companies with an emphasis on the principal opportunity but little technical expertise.

SMRs ‘ economic competitiveness can still be demonstrated in process once they are deployed, despite having lower upfront cash costs per unit. Now, SMRs are under development or in the registration period in Argentina, Canada, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States.

To day, just Russia and China have operating SMRs. Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov, the world’s first floating nuclear power plant ( FNPP ) began commercial operation in May 2020. China’s HTR- PM, a pebble- base flexible high- heat gas- cooled reactor ( HTGR ) began industrial operation in December 2023.

Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov. Image: vajiramias.com

For energy generation, Akademik Lomonosov has two KLT- 40S units, based on greeting engine units. Together, they offer 300 MW thermal furnace power that is transformed into 70 MW of total electricity by two turbo-generating sets. The ship was towed to Pevek, in the Arctic, from the Baltisky port in St. Petersburg, where it was constructed, before stopping at Murmask to collect nuclear energy.

The FNPP experienced a number of delays and costs that were at least six times as high as those that were initially anticipated, something that is encountered in almost all first-of-a-kind jobs. Nevertheless, it had on- going state support and access to Russia’s nuclear design departments and research universities.

Since more than four years ago, the Akademic Lomonosov has been providing the Pevek place with reliable power and heating, which has served as the foundation for a number of additional FNPPs and ground-based SMRs that are currently being constructed in Russia. These will provide Arctic business development projects with heat and power that normally would not be able to generate electricity. For Project 22220’s most recent nuclear submarines, they use larger RITM-200 reactors.

Russia is also in discussions with some nations regarding their exports, and all of these projects are on deadline and on budget. The funding has paid off despite the difficulties and overrevenue costs.

China’s HTR- PM. Phoro: CNNC

At the end of 2023, China’s second Generation 4 NPP show initiative in Shidaowan in Shandong province, officially launched into business operation. Product 1 reached its singularity in September 2021, and unit 2 reached its criticality two months later. Construction started in December 2012. In December 2022, both products reached full strength.

Two tiny 250MW HTGRs that drive a second 210MW engine are part of the HTR-PM project. Helium is used as a water, and carbon is used as a mediator. Each reactor’s base is stuffed with more than 245,000 pebbles, each with a diameter of 60 mm and containing 7 grams of improved 8.5 % fuel. Each micro-pebble has an outer surface of graphene and is made up of roughly 12, 000 four-layer ceramic-coated energy particles that are distributed in a matrix of graphite powder. The fuel stays fresh at temperatures as high as 1620°C, which is much higher than the high temperatures that can happen even in severe situations.

China Huaneng ( 47.5 % ), China National Nuclear Corporation ( 32.5 % ), and Tsinghua University’s Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technologies ( INET ) are the members of a consortium that owns the project. Research, development, major components, and system design are handled by INET. Huaneng is user- controller and CNNC is architectural, procurement, and building contractor and fuel manufacturer. More than 500 companies specializing in style &amp, development, executive development, technology production, production &amp, operation participated in the project.

The project also serves as the foundation for a local heating system, which heats water that travels to a heat exchange station and is then subjected to extra heat exchange to offer residential heating. The job will increase the number of square meters of cooking space by adding 190,000 square meters, replacing 3,700 metric tons of coal with 1850 households, and reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 6,700 tons.

Based on the HTR- PM, China is then developing a larger type, the HTR- PM600, with a single 650 Megawatt turbine powered by six little reactors.

Among the growing number of SMR development projects around the world, those that have made the most progress are those that are based on tried-and-true light water reactor ( LWR ) technology, such as pressurized water reactors ( PWRs ) or boiling water reactors ( BWRs ). The project nearest to completion is Argentina’s CAREM- 25 being developed by Argentina’s National Atomic Energy Commission ( CNEA – Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica ) and Nucleoeléctrica Argentina SA ( NA- SA ).

CAREM ( Central Argentina de Elementos Modulares ) is Argentina’s first domestically designed and developed 32 MWe nuclear power unit. The second self-pressurized vessel uses free convection to spread the coolant, which relies on passive safety systems throughout CAREM’s whole primary coolant system. This makes it less necessary for pumps to be present in the main circuit and less complicated the whistling system, thereby lowering the chance of mishaps resulting from a loss of coolant.

CNEA and INVAP, a technology firm, started the growth in 1980. It was given a design license by the government in 2009. First, CAREM25 was expected to start up in 2017 social shifts and economic problems resulted in disruptions and work interruptions. Before work was suspended, it was in column to be the world’s second running SMR. The ending of 2027 is when CAREM will officially start. The overall project is 62 % complete ( 78 % for the civil works building ). CAREM has benefited from state aid, just like the jobs in Russia and China. However, that assistance has not been reliable or steady, and political unrest in Argentina has stalled progress.

Another LWR projects which have made some progress include tasks by EDF Energy, GE- Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, Holtec, NuScale Power, Rolls- Royce SMR and Westinghouse Electric Company. The UK Department for Energy Security &, Net Zero, and Great British Nuclear ( GBN ) shortlisted these businesses for entry into the SMR competition in October 2023. The winner likely have state support for setting up a ship of SMRs in the UK.

Of the selected businesses, GE- Hitachi ( GEH) Nuclear Energy International, Holtec Britain, NuScale Power and Westinghouse Electric Company UK have National family or partner organizations and EDF is majority owned by the French position. All of the six technologies chosen rely on conventional nuclear technology.

Artist’s impression of the Rolls- Royce small modular reactor. Credit: Rolls- Royce SMR

A small pressurized water reactor ( PWR ) serves as the foundation for the 470 MWe Rolls-Royce SMR design. Rolls Royce SMR anticipates receiving UK regulatory approval by the middle of 2024 after the design was submitted for the UK Generic Design Assessment review in March 2022. A Rolls-Royce-led consortium of UK SMRs has the ambition to construct 16 SMRs and has plans to complete its first unit in the early 2030s and expand to 10 by 2035.

Artist’s impression of the BWRX- 300 SMR. Credit: GEH

GE H’s BWRX- 300 SMR is a 300 MWe water- cooled, natural circulation SMR with passive safety systems that leverages the design and licensing basis of GE H’s ESBWR, which has US Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( NRC ) certification. It will make use of both a design based on an already-licensed reactor as well as a combination of existing fuel, plant simplifications, and proven components.

Artist’s impression of the NUWARD 340MWe SMR. Credit: EDF

EDF’s NUWARD is a 340MWe SMR plant with two independent reactors ( 170MWe each ) housed in a single nuclear building, optimizing the use of mutualized equipment. The design is focused on standardisation, modular manufacturing and simplicity for in- factory mass production, flexibility in the construction and operation phases. A fully integrated reactor pressure vessel ( RPV ) and passive safety cooling system are housed in the nuclear island building, which is partially submerged. NUWARD is being reviewed jointly by three safety authorities: France’s ASN, the Czech Republic’s SUJB and Finland’s STUK.

st’s impression of NuScale Voygr. Credit: NuScale

NuScale’s VOYGR SMR plants are powered by the NuScale Power Module, a small PWR that can generate 77 MWe or 250 MWt ( gross ), and can be scaled to meet customer needs through an array of flexible configurations up to 924 MWe ( 12 modules ). It is the only SMR whose design has been approved by the NRC, and Nuscale claims that it is being considered for deployment by more than 10 nations.

Artist’s impression of the AP300 SMR. Credit: Westinghouse

Westinghouse launched its AP300 SMR earlier in 2023, as” the only SMR based on an advanced, large Generation II I reactor already in operation globally”, the AP1000 technology. It “utilizes the AP1000 engineering, components and supply chain, enabling streamlined licensing and leveraging available technical skills”. Westinghouse says AP300 SMR will be available in the early 2030s and is” under consideration” by customers in the UK, Europe, and North America.

Artist’s impression of the SMR- 160. Credit: Holtec

Holtec’s SMR- 160 advanced SMR is a PWR generating 160MWe ( 525MWt ) using low- enriched uranium fuel, with flexibility to produce process heat for industrial applications and hydrogen production. The design has completed the first stage of the three-phase pre-licensing vendor design review conducted by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, and it is currently undergoing pre-licensing with NRC. In the UK, Holtec has also submitted an application for a generic design evaluation of the SMR-160.

While four of these – BWRX- 300, NUWARD, AP300 and SMR- 160 – have the backing of major energy companies, Rolls Royce SMR and NuScale are stand- alone SMR companies. Both of these, which depend largely on company finance, private investment and occasional government grants, are already facing delays and funding difficulties.

Rolls- Royce requested negotiations with the UK government to find fresh investment in March 2023, and stated that the current program funding of £500m will run out by the end of 2024. The SMR unit’s CEO and finance officer were replaced, and the hiring of new employees was stopped. Rolls-Royce made the announcement in April 2024 that it would no longer plan to build a SMR pressure vessel factory and would instead purchase from a third-party supplier.

The NuScale reactor was supposed to be the first SMR to be deployed in the US, according to the US Department of Energy ( DOE). The first project, which was scheduled to start operating in 2029 at the DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory ( INL ) as part of the Carbon Free Power Project ( CFPP ), was later canceled due to concerns about its financial viability.

DOE stated that” While not every project is guaranteed to succeed, DOE continues to do everything we can to use these technologies to combat the climate crisis and increase access to clean energy.” The company had provided$ 232 million for the UAMPS project.