Japan tentatively cuts stakes in Russia’s Sakhalin 2

SEOUL – Japan’s Mitsui & Co and Mitsubishi Corp announced upon Tuesday that they have cut their stakes within the Russian Far East-based Sakhalin 2 oil and natural gas project by a combined 217. 7 billion yen ($1. 7 billion), based on Kyodo News.

Even so, they may not be pulling out of what has been touted as one of the world’s largest integrated, export-oriented oil and gas projects, as well as Russia’s very first offshore gas project. With the Fumio Kishida government keen to hedge its energy import supplies, the two firms will nevertheless retain a twenty. 5% investment within Sakhalin 2 .

It is just the latest complicated news from an industry that is being forced to re-align against the backdrop of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. With Russia being a primary supplier of energy – most notably to Europe, which strongly condemns Moscow’s assault on Kiev – the war has uncovered embarrassing dependencies.

The Japanese companies’ decision to retain a presence in Sakhalin comes despite Tokyo’s strong cleavage in order to its US ally and despite main political uncertainties hanging over the management of the project itself.

It also demonstrates frenzied calculations underway as Western European capitals agonize over regardless of whether – or to exactly what extent – they can slash their reliance upon Russian power imports as the wintertime cold season approaches.

With gas and oil prices soaring amid the war, power exports represent a massive financial pipeline for that Kremlin. In 2021, Russia was the world’s largest exporter of fuel as well as second-largest exporter of essential oil .

In an ongoing paradox, Europe continues to purchase Russian energy while simultaneously sanctioning Moscow, shutting doors to its diplomats plus channeling weapons as well as other assistance to Kiev.

While Japan is not supplying hands to Ukraine, it is, like Europe, stuck in its own power dilemma.

Japan, power and Sakhalin

In 06, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Russian federation would take complete control of Sakhalin 2 via a new working company. But substantial opacity clouds how this change will be managed.

“Details of the presidential decree are still not clear and we have made a conventional evaluation, ” Mitsui chief financial officer Tetsuya Shigeta informed a Tuesday news conference referring to the particular uncertainties surrounding Sakhalin 2, according to specialist internet site Offshore Exploration .

Thanks to the surging cost of oil and gas, the two Japanese companies – like others within the sector – enjoyed “bumper profits” for the April-June quarter, Just offshore Exploration noted.

Mitsui trimmed the significance of its stake simply by 136. 6 billion yen to 90. 2 billion yen at the end of June, plus Mitsubishi lowered the worth of its stake by 81. one billion yen to 62. 3 billon yen, the businesses mentioned individually, according to MoneyMarketAdvisory.

A good LNG tanker tons up at the Sakhalin 2 gas task. Image: Shell

Russian state-run energy player Gazprom has a 50% plus one share stake within Sakhalin-2, whereas Cover owns 27. 5% minus one share. Mitsui and Mitsubishi maintain 12. 5% and 10% respectively.

The Japanese firms’ moves are a traditional play compared to that will made by their Euro partner. Shell announced in February that it would be exiting all projects within Russia, including Sakhalin 2 . That series of divestments will, the particular Anglo-Dutch energy multinational expects, cost this some $3 billion.

Japan is a net energy importer and faces an electrical conundrum due to its enormous suspension of nuclear power generation pursuing the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. In July, the determined Tokyo lastly signaled its resolution in order to accelerate its return to nuclear.

But it now deals with a different energy dilemma with the Ukraine battle. Tokyo imports several 9-10% of its LNG from Russia, mostly from Sakhalin 2 . Overall, Russia is definitely Japan’s fifth biggest supplier of commodity future trading and LNG.

These realities describe why Tokyo is hedging its wagers.

Leading Minister Kishida has  voiced his reluctance  to out of Sakhalin , due to its provision of “long-term, inexpensive and stable supplies. ” Some Japanese sounds possess even warned that will , should The japanese cut back on its purchases of Russian energy, regional rival The far east would fill the particular gap, likely having the supplies more cheaply.

The just-announced moves by the 2 Japanese companies fall under exact line along with Japanese government plans that were announced in July. After that, sources told Japan media that Japan would maintain passions in Sakhalin 2, with Mitsui & Co and Mitsubishi Corp keeping 12. 5% and 10% stakes, respectively.

Following Putin’s June 30 decree, Japanese media reported on This summer 1 that foreign companies which wished to retain stakes in Sakhalin 2 would be required to announce their intentions within one month. Yesterday’s news suggests that the 2 Japanese firms did, indeed, make this kind of declarations.

In addition to Sakhalin 2, Japan is also a stakeholder in the Sakhalin 1 project via the Sakhalin Oil and Gas Development Co, a Japanese consortium that combines the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Sector, trading houses Itochu Corp and Marubeni Corp, and others. Japan consortium holds a 30% stake.

The principal operator associated with Sakhalin 1, US-based Exxon Mobil, announced within March that it was withdrawing from the project . Sakhalin 1 generates crude oil but its gasoline is only sold locally. Sakhalin 2 generates some 10 mil tons of LNG per year and accounts for 10% of Japan’s general annual LNG imports, according to industry resources.

All of this represents a complicated mentally stimulating games board for the Kishida government to play on.

“Japan’s choice [to side with the West on the Ukraine War] is not without costs, ” wrote Tomohiko Satake, an older fellow at Japan’s National Institute pertaining to Defense Studies in a June paper .  

“Russia continues to be one of a few partners to diversify Japan’s energy resources which are over-dependent on the Center East. Securing a well balanced supply of energy sources will be the imminent task for the Japanese govt in the years ahead. ”

Follow this article writer on Twitter @ASalmonSeoul