- Banks and insurance companies received a score of just under 50 %, which is substantially above the national average.
- Financial institutions are aware of climate issues, but they do not provide in-depth monitoring.
According to the most recent assessment from the Global ESG Monitor ( GEM) 2024, banks and insurance companies are reporting on climate issues but still need improvement. The study analysed the non-financial reporting of 194 companies, including 10 large insurers and 10 banks, with a focus on European Sustainability Reporting Standards ( ESRS ).
The financial industry, comprising banks and insurance companies, achieved only under 50 % of possible positions in reporting value, somewhat surpassing the total sample average of 45 %. This functionality both points to progress and highlights possible improvements.
Michael Diegelmann, co-founder of GEM and co-CEO of cometis, an IR and ESG firm, said,” Banks and insurance companies you tap into additional future-proof investment and profit opportunities in the long term through the stress they generate. They may also continue to raise the caliber of their reporting. There is still a lot of possible these, according to the best methods of the sector’s pioneers.
Financial institutions exhibit proper consciousness of pressing climate issues, according to the evaluation. They excelled in a number of ways, including demonstrating their devotion to the Paris Climate Agreement, making range emissions public, and presenting transition plans. However, there were significant gaps in the climate change reportage regarding endurance and the economic effects.
In resilience reporting, both sectors scored just under 60 % of points, outperforming the overall sample average of 38 %. But, endurance analyses were simply made available by about half of the nine major organizations, according to the European Central Bank. Companies only received 15 % of the possible points for reporting on the financial effects of climate change, which is mainly small.
Ariane Hofstetter, co-founder of GEM and committee member of cometis, emphasized the importance of open reporting:” Climate change is now causing huge costs today. Transparent monitoring is so important, because it is about more than just documented duty, but about the green transition of the market”.
The study also assessed ESRS compliance, where banks and insurers scored below 50 %. In light of their position as significant partners and stakeholders for a number of companies, this suggests that more open communication is required.
The International ESG Monitor, an impartial consider tank, has analysed over 1, 300 information from more than 500 firms globally since its foundation in 2020. Rules and criteria from numerous international requirements and frameworks are incorporated into its approach.
Click below to get the statement.