‘Easier to say no’: Public servants would rather decline gifts than go through declaration process

EASIER TO REJECT OUTRIGHT

Under Singapore’s public service rules on gifts, civil servants cannot retain gifts worth more than S$50 unless they pay the market value of the gift to the government, and if it does not affect the integrity of the civil service.

Public servants CNA spoke to – all of whom declined to be identified – said it was easier to decline presents outright to avoid complications. 

One who used to work in a statutory board under the Ministry of Culture, Community & Youth said: “From past experience, it is easier to reject outright and let (donors) know that we are not able to receive these gifts.” 

The public servant has returned gifts such as Chinese New Year and Christmas hampers on behalf of a superior. 

The process to declare a gift involves filling in a form which asks who the donor is, what the gift is and for what occasion, she said. The form must then be submitted to the relevant department. 

“From what I know, first thing we need to do is to politely decline,” she said, describing the process as a “best practice”. 

In cases where she has “no choice” but to receive gifts, such as plaques from foreign dignitaries, these must also be declared and may then be displayed in the office. 

A civil servant who joined the sector less than a year ago said that newcomers had to undergo a virtual course detailing what they can or cannot receive. 

“(There are) too many details and I’ve got too much work to handle, so I think it’s easier to just say no,” the civil servant in his 30s said. 

“I haven’t received any gifts personally, but seeing how onerous it is to declare gifts it’s better to just reject it outright. Best to play safe. (You) can’t run afoul of regulations if you say no.” 

His team have been told to put perishable food items, such as biscuits and mooncakes, in the common pantry for sharing. “Please don’t give civil servants anything … it’s (very) troublesome,” he said. 

Asked about his statutory board’s guidelines, another public servant said: “It’s very strict actually. Officers are prohibited from accepting gifts, in cash or kind. ‘Gift’ includes money, goods, services, passage or any form of benefit. The wording basically covers any form of gifts.” 

“But if it is impractical or inappropriate to refuse the gift because of the context and circumstances, then the officer must report and declare,” the public servant in his 30s said.

Staff from the statutory board, which is under the Ministry of Education, are required to do a yearly declaration, refresher and quiz on the Code of Conduct, which covers potential conflicts of interest. 

“To be on the safe side, one would strongly encourage any civil servant to reject all forms of gifts,” noted independent political observer Felix Tan, adding that this might come across as “draconian” or “pedantic”.

“I think what is important here is not whether they should stop all forms of receiving gifts or otherwise, because sometimes in the diplomatic circles, we do have exchange of gifts right? I think essentially it’s about declaring and accountability, and being honest and upfront about such gifts.”

Dr Tan stressed that a gift should never be a personal gift, but rather a gift given to the ministry. 

CONTROLS FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR

The private sector generally follows the same guidelines on receiving gifts.  

The Singtel Group Code of Conduct, for example, prohibits the acceptance of gifts, hospitality events or invitations due to potential conflicts of interest. 

Where it is difficult to reject a gift, the gift – unless a perishable or of a “token value” – must be declared to a supervisor and human resources (HRT). When in doubt, employees should declare, according to the Code of Conduct.  

ST Engineering’s regulations state that gifts given or received must not be “excessive, inappropriate or inconsistent with customary practice”. 

These presents must not influence or be perceived by others to influence any judgment or actions in the performance of official duties. They must also not place the recipient or the recipient’s company under any form of obligation or be susceptible of being construed as a bribe. 

Institute for Human Resource Professionals Senior Professional Li Fengling said companies should be clear in setting the boundaries of accepting gifts, which include specifying the level of approval needed and the threshold of gift value.

“Documentation is a good way to promote and enhance transparency and governance. Companies can also conduct training and share communication about ethical behaviour to help foster a culture of integrity,” the head of human resource and admin said. 

Asked if it was common practice for employees to reject gifts rather than accept and declare them, Ms Li said this depended on the value and stature of the gift. 

“If it is priced at a high value, it is advisable to reject the gift, especially if it is intended only for a specific employee.

“Employees can avoid the perception of impropriety by consistently adhering to the company’s gift policy and maintaining transparency by declaring gifts when necessary and ensuring that accepting a gift does not influence their business decisions or actions,” she added.