Climate crisis: what Trump can (and can’t) do – Asia Times

Donald Trump did take over as the world’s largest greenhouse gas emission in a while.

During a campaign cycle when America was plagued by climate disasters, neither Trump nor Kamala Harris made the weather issue a dominant part of their efforts. 232 people died in the southeast of the United States as a result of Hurricane Helene, which struck in late September and was overburdened by an unusually warm Atlantic Ocean.

The swing state of North Carolina, which veered sharply in the direction of Trump, was the state where almost half of those deaths occurred. Voters in the state’s also devastated western absenteed from polling places yesterday and voted in houses.

Experts claim that the Earth structure is in a knife’s length between the carbon-rich Amazon rainforest and the slowing down of ocean heat from North Atlantic currents. If either falls, it would point the environment into deeper chaos.

Drill, girl, drill?

Democrats lost in America’s past production hinterland, the western states that presently comprise the” Rust Belt” and the party’s stalwart” Blue Wall”.

The Nixon administration’s creation of the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) resulted from a river that was engulfed in industrial waste that caught fire here in 1969.

The EPA regulates climate pollutants with laws that limit pollution from power plants and automobiles, two of the region’s biggest CO₂ options.

Aerial view of an open-cast coal mine with power plant chimneys in the distance
Over the past ten years, EPA rules has been successful in reducing fuel consumption. Photo: Matthew G Eddy / Shutterstock via The Talk

According to economic policy experts Barbara Haya and Stephen Lezak ( University of Oxford ) and Stephen Lezak ( University of California, Berkeley ),” the policy proposals that Donald Trump and the think tanks advising his plan would turn the tide against America’s fundamental climate laws.”

According to a rightwing manifesto attached to the Trump campaign ( though not formally endorsed by Trump himself ), that could include” a whole-of-government unwinding” in which the EPA’s” structure and mission ]are ] greatly circumscribed”.

” Trump has promised to flame experts in state, place loyalists in their area and choose a ‘ drill, child, drill ‘ mentality”, say Lezak and Haya.

If he chooses to adopt the Project 2025 statement, as it’s known, Trump may also reduce funding for disaster preparedness and thus risk lives unnecessarily during mounting disasters.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ( NOAA ), a government agency that has monitored the ocean, studied the weather, and managed the protection of endangered species since 1970, would also be “dismantled” and “privatized.”

According to David Hastings Dunn, a professor of international politics at the University of Birmingham and a Project 2025 expert, Trump’s potential plans for NOAA reflect his wider agenda on the ground.

According to him,” NOAA is one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry,” and the ideological response is to banish the scientific body that produces proof that climate change has an impact.

IRAte

Trump may choose to veto the Inflation Reduction Act ( IRA ) from 2022 or to renounce Paris in Paris.

Trump’s first term removed the United States from the Paris Agreement, which mandated that all countries maintain a 2°C global warming limit. A second US exit, or a complete withdrawal from the UN climate negotiations ( another round starts in Azerbaijan ): warns climate scientist Mark Maslin (UCL).

It’s a big deal to pull out one of the world’s superpowers from international negotiations to stop global greenhouse gas emissions, he writes in an email. It also makes it easier for other nations to slow down decarbonization and blame the US for their own inachievability.

At a UN climate conference in New York in September 2019, Mike Pence and Donald Trump. &nbsp, Photo: AC News / Alamy Stock via The Conversation

The IRA extended subsidies for renewable energy until 2032, which was hailed as the Biden White House’s greatest climate achievement.

Investors in wind and solar farms typically receive federal tax breaks as a result of these subsidies. The biggest beneficiary? Banks, according to a study conducted by Durham University geographer Sarah Knuth.

Renewable tax credits were never intended to be Wall Street’s shady subsidy. They now offer significant tax shelters to banks, she claims, even though they do n’t need to file any complicated partnership forms to be incorporated into the law.

Democrats may regret supporting such a subpar model of fostering green energy, according to Knuth, and this is not the only way to finance the green transition.

She says that even the largest banks can only hold so much tax money, and that the rapidly expanding renewable energy sector requires more capital than tax equity investors can provide.

” The most significant corporate tax cuts, such as the one that was proposed under President Trump, can unfortunately shrink the entire market.”

Maslin notes Trump’s vocal support for coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, but he says he is buoyed by the strength of America’s green industries and” simple economics”.

Trump may stifle the transition away from fossil fuels and allow other nations to thwart action, he claims, but the political and economic case is still unresolved for fossil fuels.

” It is when, not if, fossil fuel ceases to be used as an energy source”.

Jack Marley is Environment Energy Editor, The Conversation

The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.