SINGAPORE: On Friday( Sept.8 ), Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Nbsp concluded a two-day working trip to Singapore, where the two nations unveiled their plans for’ youth mobility agreement. According to a statement by Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs( MFA ), this will & nbsp will help to strengthenContinue Reading
Acting secretary-general declines to assume on Cholnan’s potential son.
8 September 2023 at 16:51 PUBLISHED
Caretaker party secretary-general Prasert Chantararuangthong announced on Friday that the Pheu Thai Party will hold a public assembly on October 16 to choose opportunistic new administrative committees.
The departure of Cholnan Srikaew as party president on August 30 necessitated the vote. After the celebration decided to form a coalition government with two military-linked parties from the prior administration, Dr. Cholnan claimed he did so to keep his word.
The custodian executive committee chose the election day on Friday, according to Mr. Prasert, the minister of digital economy and society in the coalition led by Pheu Thai.
At the October meet, he said, the number of executive committee members— which includes the president, assistant leaders, secretary-general, delegates, and another group positions— will been decided.
The criteria for choosing and qualifying MPs to serve as chairmen and users of House committees on several matters, according to Mr. Prasert, were also approved by the caretaker executive committee.
He added that the issue may be brought up some time before the public forum and said the committee had not yet discussed who would be nominated for the position of party chief as well as other opportunities.
According to some group members, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, the 37-year-old daughter of gathering patriarch and former prime minister Thaksin, is preferred for the position of leader.
When asked about rumors that Srettha Thavisin, the finance minister and prime minister, might also be a candidate for the position, Mr. Prasert replied that he was unaware of any such information.
He claimed that privately, he believed the party chief needed to be someone who truly understood the function of a democratic party.
The group may also choose who will hold various political positions in the new administration, but the interim executive committee, he claimed, has not yet done so.
For leaders, the subject of succession is gentle and occasionally violent. Succession planning in Singapore is quite the opposite; it highlights the dependability and consistency of the People’s Action Party( PAP ), which is in power at the time. & nbsp,
However, it seems to be a particularly challenging task for the current prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong. Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s first prime minister and regional leader, announced that Goh Chok Tong, his lieutenant, had been unanimously chosen as his son by the second generation of PAP government officials after 31 years in office. & nbsp,
Despite Lee’s distinct preference for Tony Tan over Goh and Ong Teng Cheong among his three delegates, this was the case. Later, Ong and Tan both held the office of leader.
The selection of Goh’s replacement went even more smoothly. Over a working lunch, the third-generation leaders of the PAP decided that Lee Hsien Loong, Lee Kuan Yew’s son, would be the new princeling-in-waiting & nbsp in 2004.
Lee, who has served as prime minister for nearly 20 years, has publicly discussed his retreat, announcing that Heng Swee Keat, the finance minister, was chosen as his lieutenant in 2019 by the third generation of PAP cabinet ministers. However, when Lee cited the need for security and delayed stepping down during the Covid – 19 pandemic, sequence was halted.
Lee’s succession plans suffered greatly as a result of the A & nbsp, an incredibly weak electoral victory in the 2020 general election, and an opposition Workers’ Party gain in an important Group Representation Constituency. & nbsp,
Heng declined the election for the position of son due to health reasons. The smooth automation that characterized Singapore’s earlier moves was in question. Lawrence Wong was chosen by the PAP’s fourth-generation rulers to succeed Lee as finance minister and deputy prime minister in late 2022. & nbsp,
Wong was subsequently named chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore & nbsp as well as the Investment Strategies Committee for the government’s Singapore Investment Corporation, the largest sovereign wealth fund in the city-state.
But, just as a succession strategy was beginning to take shape, Lee’s most difficult obstacle already materialized. A & nbsp, a string of scandals, shocked parliament in July.
The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau started looking into allegations of corruption involving the rent of state-owned history houses by Ministers for Home Affairs K Shanmugam and Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan. & nbsp,
This problem arrived at a particularly delicate day when ordinary Singaporeans were dealing with rising home prices. The studies damaged the PAP’s reputation even though the allegations were proven to be false.
Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced his resignation from the Malaysian congress on July 7 in order to run for president. The death of Tharman dealt Lee’s case yet another blow, despite not being a scandal. & nbsp,
In connection with a Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau problem research, Minister for Transport S Iswaran was detained on July 11 and released on bail. & nbsp,
Since 1986, this was the first day a secretary had been detained. In Singapore, where political leaders are among the highest paid in the world, Lee gave Iswaran the go-ahead to resign and take a leave of absence while his monthly salary was cut by 82 % to S$ 8, 500 ( US$ 6, 200 ), or the lower end of the base ministerial salary of S$ 46, 750.
The same day, Tan Chuan Jin, a former speaker of parliament, publicly apologized for calling opposition Member of Parliament ( MP ) Jamus Lim” a fucking populist.” This signaled the PAP’s additional separation from the concerns of the majority of Singaporeans and undermined Tan in ways that go beyond unparliamentary language. & nbsp,
Lim, on the other hand, called for more assistance for lower-income Singaporeans in his statement. Tan left Parliament within the year for a unique purpose: he had an inappropriate partnership with other PAP MP Cheng Li Hui, who had also resigned.
The July controversies add to a plethora of well-known issues. Even though each of these issues may not be particularly important on its own, the PAP’s status as an uncorruptible organization is tarnished by their combined appearance.
This comes in response to worries about PAP MP Tin Pei Ling’s appointment as head of government relations at Grab, one of the biggest tech companies in the area, to the legislative committee that oversees the communications and information sector. Additionally, there was the guilty & nbsp, charge, and later appeal of PAP MP Christopher de Souza for professional misconduct while he was representing clients.
Potential votes may be impacted by new PAP volatility if Lee’s inheritance planning depends on stability.
Tharman’s personal popularity, however, was limited by the fact that a 2016 survey & nbsp showed that 69 % of Singaporeans would support him as prime minister, limiting the extent to which the 2023 presidential election served as the litmus test for the PAP. Only 10 % of respondents preferred Lee’s newest successor Wong, according to the same survey.
Only in the following two years, when the scheduled standard election is to take place no later than November 2025, does a reliable assessment of the PAP’s help be made.
Lee acknowledged that Covid-19 and” several controversial issues” that” have drawn Singaporeans’ attention” disrupted his succession planning in his & nbsp, National Day Rally.
Given the recent scandals surrounding his team’s & nbsp, highest-ranking members, his request for trust in Wong and his PAP team is a particularly difficult one. Lee will need to tidy up his side’s work and come up with a stronger sense of morality than to” ownself check oneself.”
Kazimier Lim is a common policy analyst based in Sydney who works for an international management consultancy. He also writes about politics in aviation, foreign relations, and Asia.
This andnbsp, post, and was initially published by East Asia Forum and are being reprinted with permission from Creative Commons.
Other age groups reported using the credits more frequently — more than 35 %. 38.8 % of those who are available and are between the ages of 30 and 39, for example, have used their credits. & nbsp,
While some young Singaporeans claimed to have recently graduated and would have the necessary expertise for their positions, some insisted that changing should still be given priority.
A 28-year-old said,” It really depends on what each person prioritizes, and if they can take evening classes after labor, then maybe there’s something that can be done for them.”
As it continues to consider how to make learning adaptable and more available, SSG is encouraging more people to enroll in classes.
He was raised in a dysfunctional household and eventually confided in the 44-year-old instructor. Otherwise, between November 2017 and October 2018, the professor sexually assaulted him.
Due to giggle orders preserving the boy’s identity, the names of the victim, man, and school may be made public.
After the sufferer informed his brother that the professor had taken him to Sakae Sushi to honor his day, the situation was made public.
The target asked to see the victim’s picture after informing his brother that the teacher would be purchasing him a vehicle for his birthday.
The nephew commented on the victim’s look after seeing his WhatsApp profile picture and enquired as to whether the teacher had ever touched him.
A police report was filed as a result of the boy’s quiet and later questioning by family members.
At the trial, the prosecution asserted that the professor had given advice to witnesses, including other faculty, regarding what to say. However, Mr. Gino Hardial Singh, the defense, objected to the lawyer’s charge of” hear tampering.”
Judge Reddy outlined the course of action based on this. The teacher’s loan requirement included avoiding phone with any trial witnesses.
But, in June 2022, he sent an email to a trial testimony asking for documents to support his case.
Judge Reddy was made aware of this, and he reprimanded the tutor and forbade him from tampering with witnesses. The judge gave the accused the benefit of the doubt and used his prudence not to raise or revoke bail when the defense attempted to defend his lawyer’s actions by claiming that all he wanted were some documents.
In spite of this, the instructor texted another trial testimony and left her a birthday present at her door in January 2023.
Judge Reddy stated,” In my opinion, this was suggestive of the accused’s lack of integrity and shame, despite having been caught once, and calmly persisted in his behavior so that he could establish contact with a witness who was expected to take the stand that really fortnight.”
I refrain from assuming that he had any evil intentions, but I do discover that his actions had severely damaged his credibility.
He continued by saying that the professor had made an effort to obstruct and organize the testimony of four defense witnesses.
Judge Reddy remarked,” Ironically, the accused himself had brought attention to this behavior of his when he attempted to confess a picture of e-mail talk.
After some questioning by the attorney, the defendant admitted that he had taken the picture while updating Ms. J., one of the witnesses, regarding the testimony being provided by a prosecution witness.
The judge noted that Ms. J was ultimately not called as a defense witness and said that the accused had done this so that he could persuade her to testify on specific issues in an effort to” correct all the wrong that( the prosecution witness ) had done.”
After conducting a cross-examination of the two defense testimony, Deputy Public Prosecutor Lim Ying Min revealed the accused’s attempts to coordinate their testimony.
On June 18, 2022, when the accused reminded them of where he had been seated in 2018, they admitted that they had sat through a” refresher.” & nbsp,
In other words, the judge said that their testimony that the accused was seated in the ancient desk in 2018 was nothing more than a parroting of what the defendant had taught them.
One of the defendant’s defenses during the trial was that he was unable to commit the majority of his crimes while seated in a different desk that was noticeable to those outside the space through the glass door.
Judge Reddy stated that he was” painfully conscious” of the possibility that the two defense witnesses’ memories may have been” subconsciously tainted” as a result of months of close contact with the accused and could not take the entirety of their testimony.
The accused had” cunningly arranged for them to remove the WhatsApp group conversations in which they had discussed the evidence ,” he continued, so it did not help that the judge was not given access to the full amount of the discussions.
Judge Reddy stated,” I was of the opinion that the accused’s cover-ups and lies had amounted to conclusive proof of his grief.”
According to the judge, several of the rests were intentional and driven by” a recognition of sadness and a fear of truth.”
Among them is the defendant’s assertion that the victim threatened to make untrue accusations of molestation against him in front of two different students.
When the two individuals testified on the walk that no such danger had been made, this was shown to be untrue.
The man’s assertion that he moved into the fresh cubicle in September 2018 was another example of this lay, and both his own witnesses and the prosecution witnesses refuted it.
The judge thoroughly considered various other factors in addition to the emotional and psychological effects of the offenses when determining the sentence.
He observed that the professor had” conducted his defense in a disappointing way, from conjuring late defenses to drip-feeding evidence as the trial progressed with much coherence to correct procedure.”
The judge stated that” his obstinate attempt at contacting and communicating with several witnesses despite clear signs that he should not do so”” aggravated this disregard for courtroom procedure.”
The judge determined that this was a” considerable aggravating factor” deserving of an increase in the starting sentence.” Whether or not the accused intended for the witnesses to deliberately give false testimony in court, it was obvious that he had at the very least intended to persuade them to think in his narrative and tailor the evidence to that belief.”
Judge Reddy stated that young kids in their early years look up to adults, such as teachers.
He said,” It is most regrettable when these mentors turn into predators themselves and harm our kids.”
The perpetrator has been discharged from services since November 2018 and is no longer employed as a teacher, according to an announcement from the Ministry of Education on August 28.
According to the voice,” MOE takes a serious view of personnel wrongdoing and will not hesitate to take punitive action against those who fail to uphold our standards of conduct and control, including termination from service.” & nbsp,
China has had a difficult time containing condemnation of its record on human rights for more than three decades.
Due to the 1989 massacre in Tiananmen Square and the latest criticism of its widespread detention of Muslim Uighurs, it faced a wave of outrage. The Taiwanese government has consistently had to deal with its own repression’s diplomatic consequences.
Foreign diplomats and propagandists have spread a number of different claims in an effort to divert this criticism. On the one hand, they have made an effort to persuade developing nations that other human rights are less important than the” right to subsistence.”
Other occasions, the government has defended its autocracy by citing standard Chinese” Chinese values.” These highlight the value of social cooperation and duty over individual rights.
In response to this condemnation, the state has now developed a cogent intellectual method. China is attempting to undermine the universality of human rights, a fundamental tenet of the post-Cold Fighting international order, in addition to resisting it.
The” Global Civilization Initiative” is the name of the new government program. And it has developed into a key tool in the Foreign party-state’s arsenal of international advertising.
Chinese President Xi Jinping first announced the effort in March. The Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative, two earlier announced( and also named ) political resources, are completed by it.
Collectively, these purposefully ambiguous ideas aim to increase China’s sway over global norms and institutions. Additionally, they support Xi’s strategy for the” great regeneration of the Chinese country.”
In establishing the Global Civilization Initiative, Xi advanced lofty ideals about building a” global network for inter-civilizational dialogue and cooperation” based on” common values of humanity ,” such as” justice, democracy, and freedom.”
Since then, China’s advertising outlets and its international propagandists have frequently echoed these elements.
The effort does, in fact, stand in for a kind of contemporary tribute system in which China, which is supremely strong, is ranked above other states from the Global South with similar ideologies.
The Chinese authorities offers developing nations profitable trade and investment opportunities as well as the capacity to adopt its authoritarian political system in exchange for bowing to Beijing.
Animal rights may suffer significantly as a result of China’s new program.
First, China’s plan calls for a cultural relativist technique based on” national conditions and special features” for each nation, in contrast to the value for universal human rights in the liberal global order.
In other words, there shouldn’t even be a general definition of human right.
Otherwise, each nation should create animal rights safeguards in accordance with its unique culture and traditions. Qin Gang, the former foreign minister of China, stated earlier this year:
In the defense of human right, there is no one-size-fits-all type.
Governments can apply international human rights standards carefully, which makes this strategy difficult. Additionally, it provides a deterrent for China’s unique human rights abuses.
The Global Civilization Initiative also poses a threat to human rights by encouraging more cooperation between totalitarian and authoritarian systems.
Xi made the distinction between China and American governments apparent when he announced the action:
The Chinese Communist Party will keep up its efforts to advance world peace and stability while defending global justice and fairness. China won’t follow the old way of colonization and plunder or the twisted path taken by some nations to get hegemony once they become powerful in advancing development.
Chinese officials have also been using benign-sounding language, such as” dialogue ,”” cooperation ,” and” common prosperity,” to promote this new strategy.
Even the ancient Silk Road was cited by the Chinese government as evidence that China has long” embodied the spirit of cooperation, shared understanding, and mutual profit.”
The goal is to assemble a sizable alliance of nations looking for an alternative to the Western-led global purchase. States refrain from imposing their personal beliefs on one another in this new Chinese-led design. Additionally, interfering in internal politics is strictly forbidden.
Once more, China can use this tactic as a diversion. It establishes a global community of like-minded governments whose officials can protect Beijing’s violations of human rights from scrutiny and criticism at international forums. At the UN, they have the option of voting in favor of Beijing’s commitments.
In exchange, following the Global Civilization Initiative may give illiberal governments more room to do their own objectives and chastise political rivals without worrying about repercussions.
The success of the Global Civilization Initiative will depend on its degree of buy-in from developing states as a self-serving tool for the prediction of China’s power and influence. This may be obvious in a world where dictatorship is on the rise and democracy and human rights are in decline.
Graduate Researcher Geoffrey Roberts works at La Trobe University.
The author has disclosed no related affiliations outside of their educational appointment and does not work for, read, individual shares in, or obtain funding from any company or organization that may profit from this article.
Under a Creative Commons license, this essay has been republished from The Conversation. Read the original publication.
This is happening as more Singaporeans start swimming as a hobby.
Swimming is one of the top five activities that people play, according to Sport Singapore’s annual National Sport Participation Survey, and its statistics have been steadily rising.
Mark Chay, the president of Singapore Aquatics, stated that the programs are a good way to boost community trust and that there are young athletes in each of the five liquid sports that make up the governing body.
Underwater players have been open to the change, he continued.
” It’s for their own security.” To create a healthy environment not only for them but also for upcoming generations of runners, they want to commit to this and to be responsible as well, he said.
Water polo player Mounisha Devi Manivannan, diver Ardi Zulhilmi Azman, musical swimmer Vivien Tai, diving Max Lee, and para diver Yip Pin Xiu are among the national athletes supporting the plan.
According to Ms. Tai, secure activity should be encouraged from a young age so that parents, coaches, and athletes are aware of what is appropriate behavior and inappropriate behavior.
She continued,” Because instructors may come from different locations with varying backgrounds and cultures, it helps to have a program in place to provide an model on what constitutes an suitable training setting in Singapore.”
According to her, the initiative might stimulate some victims who might find it challenging to speak up about their experiences with unethical behavior.
With this strategy, we hope that athletes may be better able to communicate inappropriate behavior with their colleagues or bring it up with the association in order to address the issue, according to Ms. Tai.
Ardi Azman, a regional freestyle swimmer, stated that psychological abuse must also be addressed.
” Not just the physical aspect, but also the psychological aspect ,” says the author. Body shaming or disparaging remarks, for instance, can ( unfavorably affect the athletes ), he said.
Experts claim that due to the nature of the game, it can be difficult to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate behavior, particularly between coaches and their costs.
Local sporting authorities are starting with tutors to make underwater activities safer for everyone.
Their accreditation is only valid for three years at a time, and those who want to maintain it must now enroll in an obligatory protected sport course and follow the Safe Sport Unified Code’s rules.
In the best interests of the players, the program will teach how to speak in non-aggressive ways and offer suggestions for maintaining a healthy atmosphere in the lake.
As educators interact strongly with athletes who look to them with respect and for guidance, Mr. Chay said it is crucial for them to do themselves properly and responsibly.
” Some of our aggressive athletes work with their instructors for four to five hours each day. Their conversation goes beyond a simple teacher-student bond. The educators also take on some parenting advice, the morals and ethics part, as well as a friendship component ,” he added.
According to Mr. Chay, all educators who practice in public swimming pools, clubs, and public schools will be required to take the course.
” We’re talking about anti-discrimination, abuse, physical abuse, neglect, etc.” To ensure that the environment is conducive for the players to explore the various underwater fields and realize their full potential, all mentors must go through these parts, he continued.
He remarked that parents can be more significant and perceptive when evaluating the coaching credentials and choosing a coach for their children because they are conscious of the protected sport element in the Singapore Aquatics coaching program.
According to Mr. Chay,” Singapore Aquatics’ goal is to make Singapore a world-class swimming region.”
” To accomplish that, we must create a setting where young children can pursue their dreams in safety, where kids are at ease allowing their kids to play sports, and where educators are certain that what they are doing is in the best interests of their sportsmen.”
8 September 2023 at 15: 19 PUBLISHED
With 15 group MPs scheduled to arguments on Monday, the criticism Democrat Party is prepared to grill the government about its procedures.
Jurin Laksanawisit, the interim Democrat leader, declared on Friday that the discussion would include all topics, including social, economic, and social ones. Chuan Leekpai, a record MP, is one of fifteen party MPs who have stated their desire to take part in the discussion.
After the Move Forward Party ( MFP ) began the debate, Mr. Jurin declared he would be the second speaker. In addition, & nbsp,
The original business minister stated that all Democratic debaters may exert every effort to evaluate the government’s performance.
He declared that the Democrats may have a fruitful discussion and would provide suggestions and opinions on federal guidelines in an open and honest manner. In order to get responses from the authorities on behalf of the people, the group may ask questions about some policies that might not be clear, he said.
He continued by saying that some plans were vague and that their details did not correspond to the promises made during the May 14 general election campaign.
” Come hold off until the conversation time.” There will be a lot of laws brought up for discussion. Some of the promises made by the government during the election battle are excluded. There are numerous safeguards that are not( in the scheme speech ), not just one or two. We will express our opinions in an open and without bias because the discussion will be conducted in a way that is really creative and beneficial to the administration of the nation and the interests of those who cast their ballots, according to Mr. Jurin.
The Democrats may be given 2 hours and 15 minutes during the conversation, up from the 3 days the group had earlier requested, he said. The following are: & nbsp, , SNP, BSP, NBP, ABNBSP, TBS, and NBSPS,
The Democrat Party would now play its antagonism part and give it its all, he declared. In addition to & nbsp,
” The state has declared itself to be the government of the people.” The criticism of the people includes us. Each area fulfills its personal obligation. The Democratic Party is prepared to carry out its obligation. Zero to worry about, Mr. Jurin said.
He insisted that the group had no issues working with the MFP because they were both opposition parties and were required to review the government’s job.
Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, the president of Parliament, announced earlier that a total of 29 hours would be set aside for the two-day discussion on the administration’s plan speech, which will begin on Monday.
The conversation will take place on Monday from 9 a.m. until evening, according to Mr. Wan, who also serves as House Speaker. The following day, it will begin at 9 am and last until 11 pm. Senators may have five hours to discuss the policy assertion while the cabinet has five to explain it and respond to inquiries.
According to Mr. Wan, opposition MPs would receive 14 hours, while federal members may be given five.
8 September 2023 at 15: 19 PUBLISHED
With 15 group MPs scheduled to arguments on Monday, the criticism Democrat Party is prepared to grill the government about its procedures.
Jurin Laksanawisit, the interim president of the Democratic Party, declared on Friday that the discussion would handle all topics, including social, political, and economic ones. Chuan Leekpai, a record MP, is one of fifteen party MPs who have stated their desire to take part in the discussion.
After the Move Forward Party ( MFP ) begins the debate, Mr. Jurin announced that he would speak as the second speaker. In addition, & nbsp,
The original business minister stated that all Democratic debaters may exert every effort to evaluate the government’s performance.
He declared that the Democrats may have a fruitful discussion and would provide suggestions and opinions on government policies in an open and honest manner. He claimed that because the group wanted to get answers from the authorities on behalf of the people, it may raise questions about some policies that might not be clear.
He continued by saying that some plans were vague and that their details did not correspond to the promises made during the May 14 general election campaign.
This wait until the argument days. There will be a lot of laws raised for the discussion. Some of the promises made by the government during the election battle are excluded. There are numerous safeguards that are not( in the scheme speech ), not just one or two, according to Mr. Jurin.
” We will express our opinions in a simple way, without bias, because the discussion will be truly productive and beneficial to the management of the nation as well as the interests of those who cast their ballots.”
The Democrats do receive 2 hours and 15 minutes during the conversation, up from the party’s earlier request of 3 days, he said.
Since their weak performance in the poll reduced their number to 25 MPs and resulted in Mr. Jurin’s departure, the Democrats have been bitterly divided. There have been two unsuccessful attempts to elect a new president and nbsp. However, Mr. Jurin asserted that the group was still capable of carrying out its opponent part and would give it its all.
The person’s state, according to the government. The criticism of the people includes us. Each area fulfills its personal obligation. The Democratic Party is prepared to carry out its obligations. There is no need for concern, Mr. Jurin said.
He insisted that since Move Forward and the other opposition parties were both required to scrutinize the president’s labor, the group had no issues working with them.
Wan Muhamad Noor Matha, the president of Parliament, announced earlier that a total of 29 hours would be set aside for the two-day discussion on the administration’s plan speech, which will begin on Monday.
The conversation will begin at 9 am and last until 11 pm the following morning, according to Mr. Wan, who also serves as the House speech. Senators may have five hours to discuss the policy assertion while the cabinet has five to explain it and respond to inquiries.
According to Mr. Wan, opposition MPs would receive 14 hours, while federal members may be given five.
SINGAPORE: Starting on Friday( Sep 8 ), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will travel to New Delhi for a three-day working visit in order to attend the Group of Twenty ( G20 ) summit.
Mr. Lee will take part in discussions about rules-based multilateralism, online public infrastructure, health, power moves, and sustainable development while attending the annual summit at Narendra Modi’s offer.
The Prime Minister’s Office( PMO) stated in a speech on Friday that he will also include intergovernmental meetings with other leaders outside of the mountain.
The G20 is made up of the best economies in the world and was initially established in 1999 as a platform to discuss international economic and financial problems. It consists of 19 nations and the European Union, accounting for two-thirds of the world’s population and roughly 85 % of global gross domestic product.
For this year, India is in charge of the rotating G20. It aims to foster inclusive growth and hasten the accomplishment of the United Nations’ sustainable development objectives under the style of” One Earth, One Family, and One Potential.”
The mountain, which will take place in India’s capital, is expected to feature officials from big economies, including US President Joe Biden, European Chancellor Olaf Scholz, French President Emmanuel Macron, American Premier Justin Trudeau, and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida.
The two-day elevation will not include Chinese President Xi Jinping or Russian President Vladimir Putin, with representatives from each nation being led by Premier Li Qiang and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Singapore is not a member of the G20, but it has frequently been invited to participate in previous summits and related gatherings, usually as the chairwoman of an informal group of 30 small – and medium-sized United Nations users.
Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Indranee Rajah, and another senior government representatives will travel with Mr. Lee.
Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong may serve as acting prime rector while Mr. Lee is away.