Scouts begin South Korea jamboree evacuation over extreme weather challenges

At the site, German volunteer Axel Scholl, 62, told AFP he was “at his limits” working to safely evacuate all the scouts in the heat.

“The worst thing about all of this is … It was for the kids. I’m 62 years old but this was all for the kids. Now they all go home disappointed. It should have been such a nice experience,” he told AFP, wiping away tears.

He said Poland – which will host the next jamboree in 2027 – will have learned a lot about what can go wrong from this year’s experience.

“I feel very very sorry for the Korean nation and Korean people because I think they would have loved to present their country, their culture, their community in a more positive way,” he added.

The Singapore contingent, which relocated to Daejeon city over the weekend, said that activities will go on as planned. 

The leader of the Singapore contingent told CNA on Monday that they are set to move to Seoul on Wednesday and fly back to Singapore on Saturday as planned. 

“A REALLY GREAT TIME”

Korean media have called the jamboree “a national disgrace” saying that authorities had six years to prepare but even so the site had poor drainage, rudimentary showers and toilets, and participants were afflicted by gruesome bug bites.

Following a deluge of online complaints from parents, government organisers admitted there had been “shortcomings” in the area of hygiene and the scout chief acknowledged in a post on LinkedIn that the event had a “bumpy start with … services and facilities”.

But scouts at the campsite told AFP they were sad to leave.

“It was really hot, but we had a great time. It took some while to get used to the circumstances but the youth, they had a really great time,” Nicola Raunig, 27, Austria scout unit leader, told AFP.

“I’m sad it will end now,” she said, adding that she had hoped participants could have enjoyed “the whole experience”.

“But we will make the best out of it,” Raunig said.

Continue Reading

India parliament to debate no-confidence motion against PM Modi’s government

Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the BJP Parliamentary party meeting at Parliament House complex on July 25, 2023 in New Delhi, India. (Photo by Sanjeev Verma/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)Getty Images

India’s parliament is set to debate a no-confidence motion that opposition parties have brought against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.

Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi, who was reinstated as a lawmaker on Monday, will start the debate on behalf of the opposition.

Lawmakers will vote on the motion on Thursday after the debate.

Mr Modi’s government won’t lose the vote as his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its allies have a majority.

But opposition leaders say the debate will force Mr Modi to speak on ongoing ethnic clashes in Manipur state.

The current parliament session, which began on 20 July, has been marked by protests from opposition leaders who have demanded that Mr Modi address the house on the violence in Manipur.

More than 150 people have died and tens of thousands have been displaced in Manipur since early May, when ethnic clashes broke out between the majority Meitei group and the tribal Kuki minority.

Federal Home Minister Amit Shah has said that the government is ready to discuss the issue and accused the opposition of “running away”.

Some key bills have been passed amid the disruption and protests with little debate.

This is the second time that Mr Modi’s government is facing a no-confidence motion since it came to power in 2014. In 2018, a lawmaker had moved a motion over the issue of granting a special category status to Andhra Pradesh state. It was defeated after a 12-hour debate.

The no-confidence debate will be a chance for a newly formed opposition alliance of 26 parties – called INDIA – to display their unity. The alliance, which was formed in July – aims to take on Mr Modi’s BJP in the general election next year.

Mr Modi is expected to reply to the debate on Thursday.

BBC News India is now on YouTube. Click here to subscribe and watch our documentaries, explainers and features.

Presentational grey line

Read more India stories from the BBC:

Presentational grey line

Continue Reading

Taiwan father-son duo and two soldiers charged over China spying

TAIPEI: A Taiwanese businessman and his son have been indicted for recruiting two soldiers who allegedly helped them collect confidential information for China about the island’s largest military exercise, prosecutors said. After moving to China’s southeast Fujian province in 2015 to do business, the man, identified by his surname Huang,Continue Reading

Man allegedly used Charles Yeo’s name to cheat insurers of almost S,000 for work injuries

SINGAPORE: A man was charged on Tuesday (Aug 8) with cheating insurance companies into paying out almost S$77,000 for work injury claims.

Indian national Saha Ranjit Chandra, 48, had used the name of former opposition politician and lawyer Charles Yeo Yao Hui in negotiating and settling work injury claims for foreign workers.

Chandra was handed five charges including cheating, furnishing false information to a public servant and negotiating legal claims when he was not authorised to do so.

According to charge sheets, there were two work injury claims for two foreign workers.

Chandra is accused of first cheating the Great Eastern Life Assurance Co into disbursing a settlement sum of S$35,000 to Whitefield Law Corporation between July and November 2020.

The sum was for a workplace injury claim by a Mr Manbir Singh. Chandra is accused of negotiating with Great Eastern using the name of Yeo, who was then director of Whitefield.

Chandra also allegedly cheated China Taiping Insurance into releasing a settlement sum of S$32,584 for the workplace injury claim of a Mr Sikder Md Shalim to Whitefield between January and February 2021.

Another S$9,237.80 was disbursed to Joseph Chen & Co. 

Chandra again allegedly corresponded with the insurer in the name of Charles Yeo, deceiving the insurer into believing they were corresponding with an authorised person.

Separately, Chandra is accused of failing to declare that he was under investigation, in an application to the law ministry’s Registrar of Regulated Dealers for a Precious Stones and Precious Metals Dealer licence in January 2022.

On Tuesday, the prosecutor told the court that Chandra had previously applied for his passport, in an application denied by the courts.

The application was rejected after he claimed he wanted to go to a jewellery expo in Dubai but was not “particularly clear” about this. He also said he wanted to go for a watch show in Abu Dhabi.

“Even in Singapore, CAD had difficulty securing his attendance for investigations,” said the prosecution, referring to the police’s Commercial Affairs Department. He added that there were likely to be additional charges.

Chandra will return to court in October.

Yeo, the lawyer whose name Chandra allegedly used, is facing criminal charges himself. The former chairman of the Reform Party fled Singapore after charges were filed against him and has told an investigation officer that he does not intend to return.

He breached bail conditions by failing to return to Singapore after a work trip and a warrant of arrest remains against him.

Continue Reading

Is it too late to regulate the AI arms race?

Much has been said and written about how artificial intelligence will revolutionize the world as we know it, from the way we learn and work to how we traverse the globe and beyond. But concern is growing over the use of AI in warfare, which, alongside climate change, could lead to devastating consequences for humanity.

AI already has combat experience. In March 2020, a Turkish-made drone used facial recognition to engage enemy combatants in Libya. Three years on, there is still a lack of regulation about the advanced weapons that seem to have come straight from the pages of a dystopian science-fiction novel.

Questions worth asking stem from the near impossibility of ensuring that autonomous weapons adhere to the principles of international humanitarian law. Can we trust autonomous weapons to be able to distinguish between civilians and combatants? Will autonomous weapons be able to minimize harm to civilians? Without human intervention, will it pull back in situations where emotional judgment is critical?

In the absence of human control, it will be difficult to fix accountability for war crimes. Morally, allowing machines to make decisions about killing humans, by reducing people to data, can be a form of digital dehumanization. Strategically, the proliferation of AI weapons technology will make it easier for countries to introduce AI weapons.

But most important, by reducing casualties, an increased deployment of AI weapons will lower the thresholds for countries to decide if they should go to war.

Alongside the increasing use of AI weapons technology, if access and costs were to be significantly lowered so non-state actors could include them in their arsenals, this could have catastrophic implications. With their provenance difficult to prove, non-state actors could use AI weapons to wreak havoc while maintaining deniability.

Vladimir Putin’s infamous 2017 statement on AI, where he reportedly said “the one who becomes the leader in this sphere will be the ruler of the world,” rings more true now than ever.

There now is a silent and growing AI arms race. This year, the Pentagon requested $145 billion from the US Congress just for one fiscal year to boost spending on critical technology and strengthening collaboration with the private sector.

In addition to calling for “building bridges with America’s dynamic innovation ecosystem,” the request called for AI funding.

Last December, the Pentagon established the Office of Strategic Capital (OSC) to incentivize private-sector investment in military-use technologies. The office also solicits ideas from the private sector on next-generation technologies, one of which it describes as “trusted AI and autonomy,” without specifying what “trusted AI” means.

The China factor

Nonetheless, one hopes that this semantic shift is reflective of serious consideration being given within the American military-industrial complex to ethical and legal issues surrounding AI in warfare. Or it could be linked to US-China competition.

China’s policy of Military-Civilian Fusion (MCF) is similar to the American strategy. The US has had a long head start, while China’s MCF first emerged in the late 1990s. However, it has increasingly aimed to mirror America’s military-industrial complex only since Xi Jinping came to power.

Just like the OSC, MCF policy aims to pursue leadership in AI. One of its recommended policy tools would sit just as well in the US; the MCF aims to establish venture capital funds to encourage civilian innovation in AI.

Concerns about AI proliferation aside, no country on the planet can make a convincing case to become the sole arbiter of AI standards in warfare. Neither is a global AI weapons ban feasible. Given this, there needs to be urgent international focus on the need for global minimum standards on the use of AI in warfare. This should also include a discussion on how AI will increasingly transform warfare itself.

In March, a US government official spoke about using large language models (LLMs) in information warfare. While ChatGPT has been pilloried (and sued) for “hallucinating,” or generating fake information, more sophisticated LLMs could be deployed by countries to generate hallucinations against enemies.

A military-grade LLM could be used to turbocharge fake news, create deepfakes, increase phishing attacks and even subvert a country’s entire information ecosystem. It is instructive that the US Defense Department official referred to ChatGPT as the “talk of the town.”  

In May, leading American AI firms, including ChatGPT, asked Congress to regulate AI. Even if standards were established, it would be difficult to determine in situations where it becomes hard to discern the boundary between the state and the private sector, whether due to a country’s choice (China), weak institutions (Russia), or through a carefully nurtured symbiosis (US).

In Israel, successful tech firms that specialize in dual-use military-civilian technology have been birthed by retired military officials. The Israeli military has acknowledged using an AI tool to select targets for air strikes. Although its AI military tools are reportedly under human supervision, they are not subject to regulation by any institution, just like most countries.

It then becomes crucial to look at every AI-using country’s domestic governing system – does it have, or want to have, institutions and laws that regulate AI effectively?

Unlike regulating nuclear-weapons proliferation, the world has made very little progress on the AI arms race. This is likely due to the fast pace of innovation going on in the AI space. The window of opportunity, then, for regulating AI is fast shrinking. Will the global community keep pace?

This article was provided by Syndication Bureau, which holds copyright.

Continue Reading

US-Mongolia aviation pact hit as rare earths hedge

China produced 210,000 tons of rare earths last year and remained the world’s largest exporter of the resources, according to Statista.com, with Chinese reserves amounting to about 44 million tons, followed by 22 million tons in Vietnam and 21 million tons each in China’s fellow BRICS members Brazil and Russia.

The US also has 2.3 million tons of rare earths but it has avoided exploring them due to environmental issues. This was thought to give Beijing some leverage in the current tech wars: Sanction China and we’ll whack your rare earths supply chain.

Enter Mongolia, the independent former Soviet-bloc country that borders China and Russia. A 2009 estimate by the US Geological Survey said Mongolia could have 31 million tons of rare earths reserves. The country has the potential to become a key rare earth exporter but it lacks the capital and equipment to explore them. 

And now Mongolia has signed an “open skies” agreement with the United States. Predictably the move is being criticized by many Chinese commentators, who say it will hurt Beijing’s plan to use rare earths export control to retaliate against Washington’s technology sanctions.

US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Mongolia Road and Transport Development Minister Byambatsogt Sandag on August 4 signed an agreement that aims at “expanding options for travelers and shippers, and encouraging closer people-to-people ties” between the two countries.

the Memorandum between the Ministry of Road and Transport Development of Mongolia and the Department of Transportation of the United States on Cooperation on Issues of Mutual Interest in the Transport Sector is signed by Minister of Road and Transport Development of Mongolia S. Byambatsogt and US Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg as Mongolian Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai. Photo: Mongolia Presidential Office

Since the launch of its open skies policy in 1992, the US has liberalized international aviation markets with 132 foreign partners around the world. China and Russia are not on its list.

In an official visit to Washington, Mongolian Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai met with US Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House on August 2. Luvsannamsrai said Mongolia will strengthen its strategic “third neighbor” partnership with the US. Both countries agreed to explore the idea of mining Mongolia’s rare earths and critical minerals for use in US high-technology products.

Chinese pundits said Mongolia failed to take Beijing’s feelings into consideration as Luvsannamsrai arrived in the US on August 1, a day when China’s export restrictions of gallium and germanium compounds took effect.

Gallium and germanium are not defined as rare earths as they do not occur naturally in the earth’s crust but are created as byproducts from the aluminum and zinc refining streams, respectively. The restrictions were announced by China on July 3 to counteract the US curbs.

It was thought that rare earths could be next. Xie Feng, the Chinese ambassador to the US, said last month that China would retaliate if Washington imposed more sanctions on China. Since then, some commentators have been saying that export control of rare earths could be an option.

“The US and other countries urgently need to find new suppliers” of rare earths, says Jiang Fuwei, a Hainan-based military columnist, in an article published on Monday. “In this case, Mongolia, with its rich rare earths resources, has entered the sights of the West.”

He adds that “Washington is now sparing no effort to win over Mongolia, which is adjacent to China in the south and Russia in the north and has the potential to become a strategic point against its neighbors. It also wants to disrupt the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline and other projects that are crucial to China and Russia.”

Jiang gives his imagination full rein, saying that China and Russia should pay attention to whether the US will use non-government organizations to infiltrate Mongolia, incite social unrest in the country and disrupt Mongolia-China-Russia projects. He says if the US pushes forward a “color revolution” in Mongolia, such political risks could spill over to China and Russia and threaten their national security.

He adds that it is a top mission for China and Russia to ensure that Mongolia will not lean towards the US, whether by forming economic ties with or asserting influence over the mineral-rich nation.

Ahead of more US curbs

Originally the Mongolian prime minister was set to meet US President Joe Biden but the president was away from Washington on vacation. Biden is expected to sign an executive order to restrict US companies and funds from investing in China’s semiconductor, artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum computing sectors later this month.

Mongolia Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai and US Vice President Kamala Harris. Photo: Screenshot / White House news feed

On August 4, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Luvsannamsrai signed the Economic Cooperation Roadmap for the strategic Third Neighbor Partnership between the Mongolian and the US governments. They said the roadmap will serve as the foundation for increased commercial and economic ties between the two countries in the coming years. 

A Shanxi-based writer published an article with the title “US and Mongolia plan to bypass China and Russia to ship rare earths by flights. Should they seek China’s approval?”

“Civil airplanes usually fly at a height between six and 12 kilometres while the internationally-recognized territorial airspace is 100 kms above the sea level,” says the writer. “It means that Mongolia’s rare earths transported by the US will enter China’s airspace. According to China’s aviation rules, foreign flying vehicles must apply to China and get approval before entering its airspace.”

The writer says Mongolia has suggested that it rent a 10-hectare site in Tianjin Port for half a century but China may not agree as this will directly connect Mongolia and the US, especially when the Mongolian side has no plan to pay China any transit fees. He says Mongolia can ship its rare earths to South Korea but they will also pass through territories of China and Russia.

“China does not want to stop Mongolia from making money,” he says. “But at this time, a rare earth cooperation between the US and Mongolia is, in a sense, putting pressure on China. The US hopes to get rid of its dependence on China’s rare earth supply chain with the help of Mongolia.”

“In the period when the competition between China and the US is becoming increasingly fierce, Mongolia’s move does not take into account China’s feelings and positions,” he says, adding that those in the West may be issuing empty checks while they are not good enough to replace China and Russia as Mongolia’s good neighbors.

’New Cold War’

After the Qing government collapsed in 1911, Mongolia became independent from the Republic of China. It had been politically influenced by the Soviet Union during the Cold War between 1947 and 1991. It has walked on a democratic path since the 1990s but suffered from serious corruption problems.

In recent years, the country has stepped up its anti-corruption fight in a bid to attract more foreign investments.

Luvsannamsrai told the media in the US last week that countries like Mongolia would suffer if the conflicts between the US and China escalated in a so-called new Cold War.

“I fear that the new Cold War will be very different and more difficult from the first Cold War,” he said. “We cannot bear a new Cold War situation.”

He said Mongolia hopes to maintain good relations with both China and the US. He also described the US as Mongolia’s “guiding Polar Star for our democratic journey.”

He said major powers should be responsible and avoid drastic negative effects on many countries around the world.

Harris said the US and Mongolia will work together on global challenges, including the climate crisis, will uphold democracy and human rights and will address threats to the international rules-based order. She said both countries will work together to strengthen their space cooperation.

Last month, some Chinese commentators criticized Mongolia for adopting SpaceX’s Starlink internet services, which they said would pose a potential military threat against China and provide Chinese people a possible way to get around Beijing’s strict censorship regime on perceived “harmful” foreign websites.

“Mongolia is willing to become a ‘pawn’ of the West against China and Russia, but at the same time, it continues to gain economic benefits from China and Russia,” a Sichuan-based columnist says. “Mongolia’s moves really make China feel sad.”

While some Chinese pundits and netizens said Beijing and Russia should punish Mongolia, Yan Zeyang, an assistant researcher at the Institute of Northeast Asian Studies, China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, says in an article that people should have confidence in Sino-Mongolian relations, which will not be changed by Luvsannamsrai’s single trip to the US.

Yan says there is a long way to go before Mongolia can really produce rare earths a the country will eventually have to rely on China’s refinery and logistics services. He says China is willing to deepen its strategic partnership with Mongolia but it hopes the nation’s politicians will stand on the right side on major issues. 

Read: Mongolia-SpaceX deal provokes a security stir in China

Read: Interview: Mongolian ministers have a revival plan

Follow Jeff Pao on Twitter at @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

Four slain during homicidal rampage in Bang Khen

Four slain during homicidal rampage in Bang Khen
Rescue workers remove a body from the condominium in Soi Chaeng Wattana 6 in Lak Si district where three people, including two young boys, were shot to dead by a man who then took his own life on Monday night. He also killed an elderly lottery vendor in a nearby market. (Photo supplied/ Wassayos Ngamkham)

A motorcycle taxi driver shot dead four people during a homicidal rampage police said was fuelled by jealousy, and then killed himself, in Bangkok’s Lak Si district on Monday night.

The shootings occurred in Soi Chaeng Wattana 6. The killer was identified by police as Somchai Kaewkomol, 54, Pol Capt Chairat Thamseeha, a Thung Song Hong duty officer, said.

According to eyewitnesses, about 7.30pm Somchai arrived on a motorcycle at Nicknack market in Soi Chaeng Wattana 6 and shot his estranged wife’s mother Sopha Jansoda, 59, a lottery vendor, in the head. She died later at Mongkutwattana Hospital.

Somchai then drove to Ban Suan Ratchathani condominium, about one kilometre from the market. He broke into room 225/213 on the 9th floor of Building 5 and shot dead Sopha’s elder sister, Thawee Sinma, 60, and  two boys – Thanakrit Kaewkret, 7, and Kritpas Kaewkret, 9.

All his victims were shot in the head.

Somchai then shot himself in the head and died in a shelter in front of the condominium.

Pol Capt Chairat said the two slain boys were the sons of his estranged wife Viraya Sinma, 39, by her former husband.

He said Somchai and Ms Viraya had lived together as a couple for about two years. About a month ago, Ms Viriya broke up with him after they frequently quarrelled, and she went to live with another man.

Jealousy and family problems were believed to be the motive for the killings, police said.

Continue Reading

How a risky move helped Singapore chess grandmaster Tin Jingyao to an upset win

DEFEAT AND LOOKING FORWARD

Unfortunately, the next risk Tin took, in his first game against Svane, did not have the intended effect.

Tin said he spent most of that game in a great position and was close to winning, but slipped at a pivotal point towards the end, “when it mattered”.

Facing the prospect of a draw when he had been in pole position all along, he chose a risky move to claw back a win. This ended up backfiring, he said.

“In hindsight, there was no need for me to really risk everything in that first game … If I could have done anything differently, I would probably have just taken the safe way out.”

Tin, who achieved the grandmaster title last year, feels he is at a “new beginning” for his chess career. Competing against elite players has only become more frequent in the past year and is still a “new experience” for him.

The computer science student, who is going into his third year at the National University of Singapore, spends about two to three hours each day training at the Singapore Chess Federation and with coach Andrey Kvon, or studying chess on his own.

His win over Mamedyarov was a “tremendous achievement” that put Singapore chess on the map, said grandmaster Kevin Goh, the federation’s president.

Goh added that Tin is nearing a “world class or elite” level.

“We are generally talking about fine margins, and we need to find out exactly what sort of training is suitable to help to address some of the minor issues that he’s facing right now,” he said.

The federation is looking into the possibility of bringing in trainers who can provide different perspectives from coaching at even higher levels. This will require funding, Goh added.

If the pieces fall into place, could Tin join the ranks of full-time professional chess players after he graduates?

“There’s definitely a good chance that that might be the path I want to take because I think it’s actually quite fun and interesting for me,” he said.

Continue Reading