EC reviews court ruling on MFP

Decision on party dissolution ‘soon’

The Election Commission (EC) is reviewing the Constitutional Court’s Jan 31 ruling on the Move Forward Party (MFP) to assess whether the opposition party violated political party laws, which could possibly lead to its dissolution.

EC chairman Itthiporn Boonpracong said the Office of the EC has accepted for consideration a petition calling on the EC to initiate dissolution proceedings against the MFP, and the EC has assigned the political party registrar to examine the court ruling and the Political Party Act.

On Jan 31, the Constitutional Court ruled that the MFP’s push to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code, also known as the lese majeste law, indicated an intention to undermine the constitutional monarchy.

Shortly after, the ruling political activist Ruangkrai Leekitwattana filed a petition with the EC asking it to pursue a dissolution case against the main opposition party.

Under Sections 92 and 93 of the political party law, the EC is empowered to propose the dissolution of a party to the Constitutional Court if it has obtained enough evidence the party has committed an act deemed hostile to the democratic regime with the King as head of state.

However, Mr Itthiporn said the EC will also review the formal court ruling, which is widely expected to be published by the end of this week to ensure thoroughness and fairness. Once it has obtained all the necessary information, it will make a decision.

The EC has not set a specific time frame for making the decision but the investigation process should not be prolonged due to the court’s clear ruling, he said, noting the more thorough the consideration, the better.

Asked if the MFP will be summonsed to clarify its intentions, Mr Itthiporn said the political party registrar might consider setting up a panel to gather facts surrounding the case, and the party might be called in to give further information.

Asked about comments that the EC is being used as a political tool, the EC chairman insisted the EC’s actions are always based on factual evidence, and it only carries out its duties — as required by the law.

“A decision is made based on facts, not on which party is being investigated.

“If the facts indicate that the political party’s actions fall under the EC, we are obliged to proceed.

“We work within the framework of the law, which is our tool,” he said.

Continue Reading

House backs Land Bridge

The House of Representatives has endorsed the Land Bridge feasibility study with 269 votes in favour, despite concerns and objections from the opposition.

Thirarat Samretwanich, spokeswoman for the special House committee tasked with studying the 1-trillion-baht megaproject, yesterday lauded the approval.

Ms Thirarat, a Pheu Thai MP for Bangkok, said the report would be forwarded to the cabinet and could establish Thailand as a key player in logistics and transport across Asia.

The Land Bridge, which aims to develop a logistics network connecting Ranong to Chumphon, comprises deep-water ports in both provinces, a motorway cutting across the land to connect the two provinces and a railway system.

During a debate Thursday, Move Forward Party list MP Sirikanya Tansakun, who earlier resigned as a panel member, raised objections to the project.

She said she quit because it accepted the content of a report prepared by the Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning (OTP) without thorough scrutiny.

Several members had seemed determined to green-light the project, but Ms Sirikanya expressed doubts over its cost-effectiveness and the credibility of the OTP’s revenue estimate of 58 billion baht from deep-sea ports in the first year.

She said projected revenue from deep-sea ports was 8 billion baht, with 50 billion baht to come from oil trading.

Continue Reading

Japan is doing well but isn’t ‘there’ yet – Asia Times

US Ambassador Rahm Emanuel’s recent Washington Post article, “What no expert saw coming: the rise of Japan,” lauds the country’s progress on the defense, economic, and diplomatic fronts over the last couple of years (since he arrived in Tokyo).  

If the ambassador is surprised, he was talking to the wrong people before he went to Japan.

Japan and the Japanese have always been capable of doing whatever they need to do – whenever they feel they must. Yes, that can sometimes require a crisis of sorts – and it can sometimes be foreigners who create the crisis for them.  

There’ve always been plenty of Japanese in the official and political classes who know what Japan needs to do to hold its own and advance its interests – while being a good ally with the US and other “informal” allies. 

Sometimes foreign pressure or action gives them cover. And this allows Japan Inc to move without anyone taking responsibility for whatever it is that is done. In Japan the brash, take-charge, non-risk-averse kind of guy is not exactly popular (unlike the case in America).

The Japanese citizenry does, however, respond well to someone who has a plan and acts like a leader. Former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did that during his second term and was popular – and successful.  He simply was the first prime minister, among a dozen or so who held the post over a three-decade period, who acted as if he knew what he was doing and was operating according to a thought-out agenda.

The ambassador’s article is basically a public relations puff piece. It’s true enough in parts.

But it elides the small facts that Japan – not just the Japanese Self Defense Force (JSDF) – is in no way ready to fight a war and, even worse, most of the country’s leadership (as opposed to the public in general) doesn’t appear to want to get ready or to do the necessary things to help the Americans fight a war. 

Doubling the defense budget?  Yes, they’ll spend more but they don’t really know what to spend it on – and the Americans haven’t told them.

Japan should be much farther along, and it could be. But while it recognizes the threat from China – and did so before Washington and the US Indo-Pacific Command finally sort of awoke – it doesn’t feel any real pressure, even from the United States, to take the necessary concrete measures to bolster its defense.

As for what’s doable militarily: In 2011 the experts said it was impossible for Japan to have an amphibious force. Too sensitive with the Japanese public and it would also arouse the Chinese. Japan is pacifist. Unconstitutional. Will never happen. Impossible.

Turns out it wasn’t. Within a year and a half, Japan had a rudimentary capability and sent an ad hoc amphibious task force to Southern California to do some real training – at which the visitors did very well. From “impossible” to capability in 18 months? Not bad.

And Japan has gone about developing some very useful capabilities in outer space over the last few decades – including intelligence collection capabilities.  

Before Rahm Emanuel showed up, Japan also had been quietly offering defense/security assistance in a few places – such as providing patrol boats and building dual-use infrastructure in the Philippines.

While praising Japan’s defense progress it’s necessary to realize that a lot more could have been accomplished if the United States had played its cards right. The Americans just needed to follow the advice they received 50+ years ago when Kakuei Tanaka was Prime Minister:  “Tell us what you want – and don’t back down.”  

Japan’s economic ‘recovery’?  

That probably has more to do with China screwing things and itself to the point where even the fools on Wall Street had to take notice. The Bank of Japan and Ministry of Finance did their best to fleece the taxpayers and impose austerity. But there’s a point at which outside forces overwhelmed that.

And that goes to the nature of Japan. It has the huge advantage of being a basically decent place with a mostly honest market that respects property rights. It is somewhere where you can have a contract enforced.

Japan just had to sit tight and wait for the world – money and business – to come to it. It is unfortunate that Japanese citizens had to wait 30 years.

Japanese diplomacy rightly deserves Ambassador Emanuel’s praise – though US diplomats can attest that it can sometimes seem like negotiating with the North Koreans when talking “basing issues” with their Japanese counterparts.

Tokyo has done well dealing with South Korea following the fortuitous arrival of a conservative, pro-Western administration in Seoul. Tokyo was willing to patch things up at any time beforehand. It just took external change.

Japanese diplomacy also has a different vibe – and this often works to its advantage.  Sometimes it seems to get more for its money than do the Americans, say, when dealing with Pacific Island nations, other regional countries and India, for example.

As for Japan’s diplomacy on the defense front, it’s been building ties with other nations’ militaries for some time now – and in the pre-Emanuel period, too.  

It’s good Japan is doing this.  But the defense agreements with other nations don’t amount to so much. The Germans and the Italians are going to send their navies to help Japan?  Or the Australians will send one of their eleven warships?

The advantage is mostly political, at best, in most cases

Political advantage is not to be sniffed at – but it’s still just political advantage and doesn’t get you more ships, missiles and aircraft to take on your enemies.

There’s nothing wrong with praising Japan’s achievements. But this sort of tribute, from an ambassador no less, creates the impression in Tokyo (and Washington) that everything is just fine. Sort of like the way US officials for many years repeated the mantra, “The US-Japan relationship has never been stronger.” More sober assessments were unwelcome.

Ultimately, the Japanese will do whatever they think they need to do – though they are not mind-readers and one should remember Tanaka Kakuei’s advice mentioned earlier.

Also, treat the Japan like friends and equals, which they are, and expect them to perform – and they will.  

And that shouldn’t surprise anyone.

Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and a former US diplomat and business executive. He lived in Japan for over 20 years and had a substantial role in development of its amphibious warfare capability. He is the author of the book When China Attacks: A Warning To America.

Continue Reading

Ashwin out of third Test over family emergency

Ravichandran Ashwin takes Zak Crawley's wicket in India's third Test against England

India off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has pulled out of the third Test against England in Rajkot because of a family emergency.

On Friday’s second day, the 37-year-old became only the ninth man to reach 500 Test wickets.

“The health and wellbeing of the players and their loved ones are of utmost importance,” said the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

“The BCCI extends heartfelt support to the champion cricketer and his family.”

Rajiv Shukla, vice-president of the BCCI, wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that Ashwin had to “rush and leave Rajkot Test to Chennai to be with his mother”.

After two days, England are 207-2 in their first innings, 238 behind India’s 445.

On Friday, Ashwin made 37 with the bat, then had England opener Zak Crawley caught off a top-edged sweep to reach the milestone of 500 wickets.

He is the second Indian to achieve the landmark and fifth spin bowler.

Ashwin was also the batter in question when India were penalised five penalty runs for running on the pitch.

If he does not return to the Test, India will not be allowed to replace his batting or bowling, but will be permitted a substitute fielder.

“In these challenging times, the BCCI and the team fully supports Ashwin,” said the BCCI statement.

“The board and the team will continue to provide any necessary assistance to Ashwin and will keep the lines of communication open to offer support as needed. Team India appreciates the understanding and empathy of the fans and media during this sensitive period.”

The five-match series is currently level at 1-1.

India are already without star batter Virat Kohli, after he withdrew from the series for personal reasons.

Continue Reading

Snap Insight: Budget 2024 CPF measures will improve Singaporeans’ retirement adequacy

REMOVAL OF CPF SPECIAL ACCOUNTS CLOSES A LOOPHOLE

Bundled in the Budget 2024 announcements relating to CPF was the closure of the Special Account once members are 55 years of age and their CPF Retirement Account has been set up. 

When implemented next year, this would resolve a long-standing anomaly whereby a CPF member aged 55 years and up would have two accounts that hold savings intended to provide retirement payouts: The Special Account and the Retirement Account.

Both these accounts earn the same long-term interest rate at 4.08 per cent for the current quarter.

However, while some Special Account savings of CPF members aged above 55 can be withdrawn on demand, savings in the Retirement Account are held to provide CPF Life payouts at the applicable CPF Life payout eligibility age (currently 65 for those born in 1954 or later).

Some savvy investors may be aware of this loophole that enables them to withdraw some of their Special Account funds out on demand after they hit 55 years of age, and still transfer it back as and when they wish. Thus, these funds should not earn the long-term interest rates that fund long-term retirement adequacy.

The continued existence of a member’s Special Account when the Retirement Account has taken over the role of holding long-term retirement savings is thus an anomaly that the CPF Board is now resolving.

Christopher Gee is Senior Research Fellow and Deputy Director at the Institute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore.

Continue Reading

Snap Insight: Budget 2024 – SkillsFuture has levelled up, so should Singaporeans

INERTIA AND INACTION

The remaining challenge then will be our own behavioural biases.

We are often aware of what is beneficial for us – we know we should save for rainy days, exercise more regularly and continuously enhance our skills.

Yet, due to behavioural biases like the status quo bias, we often struggle to make meaningful progress towards our goal. Consequently, we may lack the motivation to do meaningful action such as upskilling until it is too late, where we face challenges in the labour force.

As a major policy initiative, the SkillsFuture Level-Up Programme has the ability to mitigate these behavioural biases as skills upgrading is made more salient.

With the attractive financial benefits, the initiative can help overcome the inertia associated with inaction. Additionally, households might feel that they are missing out on the benefits and subsidies should they choose not to pursue another full-time course.

Coupled with the influence of peer effects, this could eventually create a movement of continuous learning. Let us keep the conversation going.

Chua Yeow Hwee is an Assistant Professor in Economics and Deputy Director of the Economic Growth Centre at the Nanyang Technological University (NTU). The opinions expressed are those of the writer and do not represent the views and opinions of the institutions he is in.

Continue Reading

Budget 2024: In S1.4b ‘Forward SG Budget’, DPM Wong unveils first steps towards achieving 4G team’s ‘ambitious agenda’

GROWTH, BUT NOT AT ALL COSTS Even as he unveiled a slew of support schemes to nurture a more caring and inclusive society, Mr Wong did not mince words when it came to talking about the importance of economic growth, saying the government “makes no apology for pursuing growth”. “InContinue Reading

Cambodia jails Taiwanese YouTuber for fake kidnap

Men paraded in front of the mediaCambodian National Police

A Taiwanese YouTuber has been jailed in Cambodia for attempting to stage his own abduction with a friend.

Chen Neng-chuan was arrested with his friend, Lu Tsu-hsien, after posting a video of them apparently being detained and beaten up by security guards in the port city of Sihanoukville.

The area has become notorious for gangs kidnapping people and then forcing them to carry out online scams.

Both men have been sentenced to two years in prison.

The pair were arrested after Chen – known online as Goodnight Chicken – posted videos on Monday, in which they claimed they had been kidnapped and needed help.

The following day, Chen’s wife announced on social media that her husband had gone missing. He then posted another video claiming they were fleeing the kidnappers and said he had been injured in the ordeal, with part of his head shaved.

But online sleuths quickly started casting doubt on the story.

Online influencer Liu Yu managed to pinpoint Chen’s location using the footage he had posted, and showed that Chen appeared to have circled an area instead of running away as he claimed.

He also questioned why his abductors would have allowed him to keep his equipment for live streaming.

Soon after, the pair were arrested in their hotel room. They were then paraded in front of the media along with props found in their room.

The provincial court said on Friday that they had been found guilty on charges of “incitement to cause chaos to social security”.

The provincial government said the men produced videos with “fake content that affects the honour, order, and security” of the province.

They were both handed two-year sentences and ordered to pay a combined fine of around $2,000 (£1,590).

Online scam-related human trafficking is a huge problem in Cambodia, and Sihanoukville is one of the worst areas for it.

A UN report released last year estimated that around 100,000 people had been forced into working these scams in the country.

Most victims are men from Asia, but some have come from further afield such as Africa and Latin America.

Related Topics

Continue Reading

New anti-poverty programme announced

Special development zones will be based on sufficiency economy principles

New anti-poverty programme announced
The plan for new development zones is based on the principles of the sufficiency economy, says Suttipong Juljarern, permanent secretary for the Ministry of Interior (Photo: Ministry of Interior)

The Ministry of Interior is looking to establish an organisation called the Office of Sufficiency Economy Development Zone (OSEDZ), to tackle poverty and provide people with some economic stability.

The project takes its inspiration from the sufficiency economy philosophy championed by His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej The Great, said Suttipong Juljarern, the ministry’s permanent secretary. 

“His Majesty’s philosophy is an important methodology that will help eradicate poverty and increase people’s potential,” he said.

The ministry also aims to reduce the income gap and raise the quality of living for people in targeted areas.

The scope of operations of the OSEDZ will include the development of civil servants and social work; preservation of the environment and natural resources; and public interest activities.

Mr Suttipong said people in targeted areas would be able to rely on themselves and earn a decent living with help from the programme, leading to more stability and security.

The idea for the OSEDZ grew out of discussions held on Feb 8 about sufficiency economy development zones. Participants included Mr Suttipong and his adviser Pichet Sowittayasakul; Theeraphong Krutdilakanan, deputy director-general of the Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning; and Suwit Sappavitthayasiri, assistant director of the Fiscal Policy Research Institute.

Continue Reading

Court dismisses Daruma sushi fraud case

Judges say owner had no intention to deceive buyers of discounted dining vouchers

Court dismisses Daruma sushi fraud case
Metha Chalingsuk, owner of the Daruma Sushi restaurant chain, was arrested on fraud charges at Suvarnabhumi airport on June 22, 2022. On Thursday the Criminal Court dismissed the case against him. (File photo)

The Criminal Court on Friday dismissed a high-profile fraud case brought by customers and investors against the Daruma Sushi Japanese buffet restaurant chain.

The court found that owner Metha Chalingsuk, as well as the company that runs the chain, not guilty of public fraud, computer crime, money laundering and fake advertising, in the case that dates back to 2022.

Mr Metha, 41, was present at the court to hear the ruling.

Daruma Sushi Co was registered on Jan 12, 2016 with registered capital of five million baht. Known for its salmon buffet at low prices, the company expanded to 27 locations.

The company came under fire in 2022, after a total of 999 people filed complaints to the police. The group included 11 franchisees who had bought the rights to run a branch for between 2 million and 2.5 million baht each. The complainants demanded 42.3 million baht in damages, claiming they were defrauded by Mr Metha and Daruma Sushi Co.

The other 988 complainants were consumers who had bought vouchers for discounted dining in bulk, but were left unable to redeem them after the chain shut down on June 16, 2022 because of liquidity problems.

Prosecutors asked the court to rule on two issues: whether the defendants had committed fraud and if they had laundered the restaurant’s income.

The judges heard customers were able to use the vouchers until the restaurant began experiencing financial trouble.

However, the Russia-Ukraine war that began in early 2022 drove up prices of fresh salmon, the main attraction on the Daruma menu. Consequently, the restaurant suffered liquidity problems and eventually had to close.

Amid the pressure brought on by the business failure, Mr Metha fled the country but he later decided to return and was arrested at Suvarnabhumi airport in June 2022.

In its ruling, the court found that the defendants had no intention to deceive customers, despite having set its voucher prices very low, which the restaurant claimed was a marketing strategy to draw in customers.

Also, the court ruled the defendants did nothing to force customers to buy the vouchers, nor did it conceal facts about the restaurant’s financial situation. Therefore, the judges said, they did not set out to defraud anyone.

As well, the court found nothing amiss in Mr Metha’s finances that could prove he had laundered the restaurant’s money.

He regularly transferred money from his private bank accounts to his adoptive mother in order to care for her and to his friends to settle personal debts. He also made financial transfers overseas but they were for personal spending.

The court decided there was no credible evidence to prove the defendants had broken the law and dismissed the case.

Continue Reading