Asia (Page 2,410)

Bangkok governor Chadchart Sittipunt has ordered all district offices in Bangkok and the City Law Enforcement Department to speed up processing times for foreign film shoot applications.

Applications for shoots in public areas should be processed within three days or seven days for public parks.

Mr Chadchart said yesterday that Tourism Department director-general Chaturon Phakdiwanich had raised complaints by foreign filmmakers with City Hall that shooting productions in Bangkok were made difficult by official protocol.

Many claimed the application process takes a long time and is not structured clearly.

Mr Chadchart said existing application procedures left the door open to bribery and such misconduct hurts the country’s reputation.

According to the governor, Mr Chaturon also said that some foreign film crews were fined by officials from the City Law Enforcement Department in Ratchathewi and Pathumwan districts even though they had applied for a production permit in Bangkok.

The officials claimed the filmmaking crew had obstructed pavements and traffic.

Also, filming applications in 51 parks under the BMA’s Environment Department and Sanam Luang should take seven days to process.

However, filmmakers will be charged 6,000 baht per day for commercial TV shows and 3,000 baht for commercial photoshoots, Mr Chadchart said.

The Move Forward Party (MFP) will submit an urgent motion asking the House of Representatives to pass a resolution seeking a public referendum on rewriting the constitution.

MFP list-MP Parit Wacharasindhu said yesterday the proposed referendum would ask people if they agree with setting up a charter-rewriting assembly, with members publicly elected to draft a new constitution.

He said two key elements must be addressed — whether the charter should be entirely rewritten and if the writing body should be directly elected.

He said these are the questions put forward in the opposition-sponsored motion approved by the House of Representatives last November that the Senate shot down.

Mr Parit said the party has been campaigning for a rewrite of the 2017 charter because it lacks legitimacy and contains several flaws that have led the country into a political crisis.

If the resolution is passed by parliament, the cabinet will be asked to arrange the referendum. He said that if people agree with entirely rewriting the charter, three rounds of referendums are required.

The MP said he hopes other parties pledging to amend the charter will support the motion so the issue can be debated, even though the Senate can still reject it. He insisted the charter rewrite would not change the country’s governing system, when quizzed about critics’ concerns that Chapters 1 and 2 could be affected.

Chapter 1 contains sections defining Thailand as a single, indivisible kingdom with a democratic regime and the King as the head of state. Chapter 2 contains sections pertaining to the royal prerogatives.

According to the MP, Section 255 of the current charter prohibits changing the country from a democracy with the king as head of state and the type of state from a single state.

“Whenever a new charter was written in the past, Chapters 1 and 2 were revised, but it didn’t lead to a change in the governing system. Moreover, the charter allows changes to be made to the two chapters, but not without a referendum,” he said.

Ageing society needs a different approach

Thailand needs to make elderly care a national agenda item with integrated approaches adopted to ensure senior people get the care they need regardless of where they live, according to the Ministry of Public Health.

The nation is already a fully-fledged aged society, with the elderly demographic now standing at around 13.5 million, or 20% of the population, said Deputy Prime Minister and Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul.

This year has been dedicated to preparing Thailand for how to cope more efficiently with the challenges associated with ageing.

Efforts to protect their rights will be improved and resources pooled and exploited more efficiently, Mr Anutin said.

Certain laws, for instance, will be amended to allow more migrants to work in sectors facing a labour shortage. The amendments will also help retirees continue working where appropriate, he said.

“Not all retired people have to stop working and stay home doing nothing. Neither do they have to work as hard as they used to when they were young and risk hurting their health in a work-related accident,” said Dr Thongchai Keeratihuttayakorn, director-general of the Department of Medical Services.

Regular health checks can measure elderly workers’ ability to keep working safely.

Existing funds and new sources of financing will be managed together to create jobs and build more elderly care facilities designed for local communities across the country, Dr Thongchai said.

Community- and home-based care and telemedicine services also will play a key role in Thailand’s elderly care in the years to come.

These are the responsibility of various state agencies including the National Health Security Office and local administrative organisations nationwide.

A state-run sheltered home for the elderly will be opened in every tambon nationwide to take those who do not have anyone to look after them at home, said Mr Anutin.

MFP will try to reprise Pita motion

The next round of voting for a prime minister is likely to take place on Tuesday after the Constitutional Court yesterday dismissed the Ombudsman’s petition on the rejected renomination of Move Forward Party (MFP) leader Pita Limjaroenrat.

The court’s unanimous decision is seen as clearing the way for the process to select a new leader to proceed. The selection was on hold pending the court’s ruling on parliament’s decision on July 19 to reject Mr Pita’s renomination.

Citing the court’s decision, parliament president Wan Muhamad Noor Matha said yesterday parliament’s rejection of Mr Pita’s renomination is considered valid but parliament’s legal team will meet today to study the court’s decision.

He would then meet parties and senators to discuss the vote.

He said a prime ministerial candidate is not legally required to outline his vision before parliament although some senators have demanded Pheu Thai’s Srettha Thavisin to do so and address questions they may have.

The two prime ministerial candidates on offer in 2019, Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha and Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, did not present their vision before the vote, said Mr Wan.

In dismissing the petition brought via the Ombudsman, the court said the three petitioners were not directly affected by parliament’s decision. The complainants were Pornchai Theppanya and Boonsong Chalaythorn, who both voted for the MFP in the May 14 general election. Another complainant was MFP MP Panyarut Nuntapusitanon.

They said parliament’s rejection of Mr Pita’s renomination affected their constitutional rights. They also sought a court order for parliament to put off the vote pending its ruling.

However, the court said the prime minister is selected under Section 272 and Section 159 of the charter and any candidate put forward must be nominated under Section 159.

In this case, the three petitioners were not named as prime minister candidates by any party and were not nominated for the vote in parliament either, so their rights were not directly affected.

Shortly after learning of the ruling, Mr Pita said he would not a file a fresh petition with the court because he believed the matter should be settled by parliament, not the court.

MFP MP Rangsiman Rome said the party would submit a motion asking parliament to review its rejection of Mr Pita’s renomination again.

He said the party’s move was not an attempt to create political trouble and he expected parliament to correct its mistake.

“This is a matter of principle. We’re not doing it for our own gain or to have Mr Pita renominated.

“A prime minister candidate, regardless of the party, will benefit from this motion except those who have a hidden agenda,” he said.

With the prime minister voting coming up, Bhumjaithai Party leader Anutin Charnvirakul reiterated yesterday that negotiations over the allocation of cabinet seats should take place before the vote.

He denied reports the party and Pheu Thai could not reach an agreement on the distribution of positions, but said the party should be allowed to continue working in ministries it holds now for the sake of continuity.

Meanwhile, the court yesterday also gave the MFP and its leader another 30 days to give a statement in a case that could lead to the party’s dissolution.

The case was filed by Theerayut Suwankesorn, a lawyer well known for his defence of Suwit Thongprasert, an ex-activist monk formerly known as Phra Buddha Isara.

Mr Theerayut asked the court to rule if the MFP’s policy on Section 112 of the Criminal Code, better known as the lese majeste law, was an attempt to overthrow the constitutional monarchy.

A former event organiser, cleared by a court of charges of colluding to siphon 1.6 billion baht from a university, is pressing for compensation and a return of some of his assets that were impounded during the investigation.

Pada: Seeking justice

Pada Buakhao has formally petitioned the Justice Ministry seeking justice after he was acquitted by a lower court of being complicit in swindling 1.6 billion baht from King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL).

The ruling was upheld by the Appeal Court and the prosecution did not take the case to the Supreme Court. The acquittal ruling handed to Mr Pada was final.

The embezzlement scam came to light after KMITL filed a complaint with the Crime Suppression Division (CSD) on Dec 16, 2014, against the former manager of Bank of Ayudhya’s Big C Srinakarin branch, as well as the head of KMITL’s financial division.

The university said it had found financial irregularities and asked police to investigate.

Their probe pointed to Mr Pada’s involvement in the disappearance of the technology institute’s money between 2012 and 2014. He reportedly worked as an event organiser with the university.

Now that the case against him has been thrown out, Mr Pada said he was entitled to compensation for the four years he spent in detention as a suspect.

In his petition, Mr Pada asked the ministry to approve the awarding of damages.

Worapan Kladwang, a justice specialist at the Rights and Liberties Protection Department, said the compensation rate for detention is 500 baht per day due to the loss of opportunity to make a living, as well as a one-off sum of 100,000 baht in lawyer’s fees.

Mr Pada also asked the ministry to help him recover some of his belongings impounded during the investigation, which are now unaccounted for. He claimed they were worth about seven million baht.

In total, 40 of his belongings were seized. However, it is unclear how many he has been unable to recover.