Julian Assange heads to freedom. This is how the deal was done

By:
On:
In: Asia

6 days ago

By James Landale & Tiffanie Turnbull, BBC News, London & Sydney

Getty Assange supporters outside the Royal Courts of Justice in May Getty

In the end, it was a combination of diplomacy, politics, and law that made it possible for Julian Assange to take off on Monday in a secret flight from London’s Stansted aircraft, heading finally to Australia and flexibility.

After seven years of self-imposed confinement and next five years of forced detention, the agreement that gave him his freedom was weeks in the making but unforetably questionable.

In a statement, the Crown Prosecution Service ( CPS) said the possibility of a plea deal” first came to our attention in March”. Since then, it has been “on the concepts” of how to get Mr. Assange released and appear before a US national judge “in compliance with his desires and those of the US government.”

After so many decades of stalemate, the agreement possibly began with the election of a new American government in May 2022, which put in place a government that was determined to bring one of its people who had been detained abroad to safety.

Anthony Albanese, the new Labor prime minister, said he did not support all Mr Assange had done but “enough was plenty” and it was time for him to get released. He made the case a priority, generally behind closed doors. Not all international affairs are best handled with the noisy hailer, he said at the moment.

Mr Albanese had mix- gathering support in Australia’s congress also.

In September, an MP committee made a direct lobbying trip to Washington. The prime minister therefore addressed the matter to Joe Biden during a state visit in October at the White House.

Following this, a parliamentary vote in February saw MPs ‘ overwhelming support for a petition asking the US and the English to enable Mr. Assange to return to Australia.

They lobbied challenging the significant US ambassador to Australia, Caroline Kennedy.

Stephen Smith, who took over as the new Asian High Commissioner in London in the early 20th century, was a key person.

According to political resources, he “did a lot of the heavy lifting, making it a specific thing to get this over the range.”

In a previous American government led by Kevin Rudd, the present embassy in Washington, who was also involved in the discussions, Mr. Smith was also the foreign secretary. He paid an earlier visit to Mr. Assange in Belmarsh jail in April 2023.

There was a “natural inclination” for Australian governments to support the US, according to Simon Jackman, Honorary Professor of US Studies at the University of Sydney, but both countries ‘ public and political sentiment had changed just enough to give Mr. Albanese a” cover” to demand his release behind closed doors.

Also at times, American ministers made comparisons between Mr. Assange’s detention and that of other American citizens held as social prisoners by Iran and China.

Greg Barns, a attorney and legal assistant to the American Assange campaign, said it was the politicians that made a change.

” The Albanese state was the first to bring the issue into the US. And Albanese got aid from the opposition.

” The treatment]of Julian ] stuck in the throat of many Australians. People may ask,’ where’s the open attention in that?’ “

@WikiLeaks/PA Wire Assange leaves his jet in Bangkok, Thailand@WikiLeaks/PA Wire

The legal crutch

Next came the rules. The UK High Court erected a constitutional emergency for Julian Assange on May 20.

He was given the option of filing a fresh appeal against US prosecution’s attempt to possess him extradited to a US court for obtaining and publishing military secrets.

At this point, he faced several charges under the US spy work: 17 of printing official secrets, each of which carried a maximum 10- year prison term, and one of hacking, which was punished by up to five years.

One of the main points of the decision was whether Mr. Assange, an American national, could use the US legal First Amendment right to free speech as a defense.

Previous CPS extradition head Nick Vamos and former head of business violence at Peters & Peters said the May ruling prompted both sides to agree to a deal and bring it to a conclusion.

He claimed that the decision might have paved the way for Mr. Assange to assert that the First Amendment protected the publication of classified US information, which” may have resulted in months, if not even more years of delays and stress.”

It appears as though the US dropped the posting charges in exchange for Mr. Assange to plead guilty to hackers and “time served,” which finally brings this saga to an end, he said.

Mr. Vamos added that Mr. Assange’s legal team would have acknowledged that the distinct cost relating to hacking would not have been affected by the First Amendment.

So even if they later dismissed the charges brought against them for the release of the key material, there would still be no defense against the charges brought against them for hacking.

” Both attributes saw the challenges and that brought them to the table, “he said.

According to Whitehall sources, the next High Court reading was quickly looming on July 9 and 10 and both sides were aware that a package must be reached right away.

The elections behind the scenes

As always, elections even played a part.

Some time ago, the Americans had indicated their willingness to reach a bargain. Ambassador Kennedy formally suggested a plea deal might be a way to end the stand-off in August of last year, a recommendation that Mr. Assange’s attorneys eventually picked up.

And in April, Mr Biden said he was considering a demand from Australia to cut the trial.

The US and Australia had established the so-called Aukus defence and security agreement, which US officials were concerned about protecting.

Some diplomats were eager to square off with the Assange case, which had been a long-standing irritant in UK-US relations.

There was growing rumors that the Biden administration wanted the problem resolved before the November presidential election, and some Assange supporters yet suggested that the US feared a Labour-led UK government would be less eager to accept his extradition.

The White House quickly stated on Tuesday that the Department of Justice had jurisdiction over the specifics of the plea deal.

After years of legal and political tussles, it appears that everyone finally reached a point where they both wanted a deal and were willing to make a compromise in exchange.

Continue Reading

Putin’s mutual defense treaty with Kim may backfire – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, lists very few nations on his current list of available global travel sites. He made the wise decision to travel to Pyongyang so that he could be feted as a friend despot and receive comfort from isolation and sanctions-imposed isolation.

However, if the South Korean government follows through on its commitment to backfill US and Polish stockpiles, Putin’s decision to mark a complete common security agreement with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un might end up being an own-goal rather than a corporate breakthrough.

Putin good envisioned a rise in South Asian numbness regarding open military aid for Ukraine while expanding the range and varieties of Northern Korean weapons that were available for Russia’s war work.

In recent months, North Korea and Russia have heightened their stance on perceived US colonialism as well as Russia’s actions to put an end to the UN Panel of Experts ‘ investigation and recommendation of international sanctions for North Korean violations of majority UN resolutions involving its nuclear and missile development activities.

At a press conference on May 9th, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol reiterated his desire to keep ties with Russia” as soft as possible” and reiterated South Korea’s plan of never giving Ukraine military equipment immediately.

Regarding South Korea’s credibility as a partner with similar goals, the facetious ties that existed prior to the Kim-Putin mountain sparked a lot of inquiries from EU and British political representatives, with whom I spoke a week beforehand to Putin’s attend.

My interlocutors specifically brought up Europe’s desire to ensure South Korea’s support for Ukraine and its sorrow with South Korea’s rhetorical support, which was mainly weak in comparison to that of Japan. The United States should have put more pressure on South Korea to become more in line with the West in the fight against the war in Ukraine, the Western participants questioned.

The statement of a North Korea-Russian mutual defense treaty suggests that South Korea’s first response may help to quell Western concerns by stoking the Yoon administration’s desire to support Ukraine in essential areas like anti-missile systems and immediate munition supplies.

Following the announcement, South Korea’s memorandum to the Soviet ambassador to South Korea, Georgy Zinoviev, demanded that Russia cut off military ties with North Korea. Putin also issued a public notice that it would be a “very great error” if South Korea carried out its threat to provide munitions directly to Ukraine.

The signing of the common defense pact, which North Korea and Russia may want to exploit, has a big impact, according to Putin’s ambiguous comment: the Korean Peninsula’s reconnection risks are related to the wider geopolitical environment and worldwide geopolitical rivalries.

As a result, North Korean actions against Russia will need to consider the possibility that Russia will launch retaliation by expanding the scope and breadth of military cooperation with North Korea, including the use of cutting-edge satellite and ballistic missile technology.

However, one possible reason for Russia’s drafting of the joint defense agreement with North Korea is to encourage the development of a subsequent front for a military conflict outside of Ukraine, both as a means of inciting South Korea’s caution regarding the export of defense equipment to Ukraine and as a pretext for a wider conflict that might have an impact on US global military strategy.

The Yoon administration will have to bridge these obstacles by closing the gap in perspective and approach with like-minded Western allies and by enhancing US- Japan- North Korean military cohesion in response to tighter North Korea- Russia ties. In this respect, the schedule of Putin’s visit to Pyongyang may welcome interest and a unified response from NATO’s 75th anniversary celebrations in Washington, DC, and from the American, Japanese, and South Korean officials on the outside of those discussions.

Scott Snyder is author of&nbsp, The US- South Korea Alliance: Why It May Fail and Why It Must Not. The Korea Economic Institute of America (KEI ) is led by him as president and CEO. This article was KEI’s original publication. It is republished with permission.

The Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, a public corporation established by the Republic of Korea, is a registered trademark of KEI as an agent of the FARA.

Continue Reading

Australian combat jets will fire US hypersonics – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Australia is set to test-launch a US fast missile from one of its combat planes in a bold move to regain its long-range attack skills.

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF ) is scheduled to launch the US Air Force’s Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile ( HACM) test missile over Australian ranges this month, according to The War Zone.

The War Zone information that the HACM system, a cooperative effort between the US and Australia, aims to strengthen both nations ‘ atmosphere- launched hypersonic cruise missile capabilities. The missile, which has a two-stage design with a rocket booster and a scramjet cruiser, has been developed by Raytheon and Northrop Grumman since 2022, according to a US Government Accountability Office ( GAO ) report.

While The War Zone mentions that the rocket’s maximum acceleration is unknown, it is expected to surpass Mach 5, the threshold for fast rate. According to the GAO statement, flight tests may begin in October and continue until March 2027.

According to The War Zone, the determination to use RAAF F/A- 18F Super Hornets for testing was prompted by US testing infrastructure limitations. Woomera Test Range in Australia offers a safe and distant setting that is ideal for sensitive trials.

Additionally, it states that the USAF intends to incorporate HACM immediately into the F-15E Strike Eagle and possibly add it to other aircraft. The source notes that the program’s progress is carefully watched, as fast weapons are considered important for future higher- end conflicts, offering rapid, difficult- to- intercept strike capabilities.

The War Zone claims that this collaboration is a result of the US and Australia’s growing defense partnership, which is further strengthened by the AUKUS agreement, which includes cooperation in areas like unmanned aircraft and artificial intelligence.

Australia’s Defense Strategic Review 2023 ( DSR 2023 ) notes that Australia’s anti- access/area denial ( A2/AD ) strategy is often synonymous with long- range strike capability alongside undersea warfare and surface- to- air missiles ( SAM ). According to the DSR 2023, long-range strike capability is essential for a adversary’s northern approach to be in danger.

It makes note of the importance of having an A2/AD strategy in place to prevent an adversary from militarily coercing Australia and carrying out attacks against Australia without putting them in danger.

Further, in a May 2024 article in the peer- reviewed Journal of Strategic Studies, Fabian Hoffman argues that long- range strike weapons can become strategic deterrents by fulfilling counter- population, strategic interdiction, counter- leadership and counterforce roles.

Hoffman mentions that long-range counter-population strikes are carried out against civilian targets to lower an opponent’s morale. For strategic interdiction, he says that long- range strikes aim to destroy an adversary’s war- making capability, such as industrial infrastructure, supply chains, and transportation nodes.

He adds that counter- leadership long- range strikes aim to target and neutralize an adversary’s leadership. According to Hoffman, such strikes can annihilate hardened command and control nodes, and advances in hypersonic and sensor technology make them more effective against time-sensitive targets.

Hoffman points out that conventional counterforce long-range strikes can be used to “lock out” an opponent from the battlefield by overwhelming the use of force at the operational and tactical levels or to paralyze an adversary by knocking out critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance ( ISR ) nodes.

Since retiring its F-111s in 2010, Australia has lacked long-range strike capability. Additionally, it has canceled its plans to equip its Collins-class submarines with Tomahawk cruise missiles, leaving it with no such capability.

However, Andrew Davies claims in a March 2021 paper for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute ( ASPI ) that intermedia-range hypersonic cruise weapons may be a viable way to restore Australia’s long-range strike capabilities, which were previously provided by the F-111, despite the threat calculus during the Cold War being significantly different from today.

Davies mentions that Australia’s 1960s decision to acquire the F- 111 was driven by an assessed risk of aggression from Indonesia, which was countered by the capability to strike anywhere in the archipelago.

He asserts that there is a chance that China will respond in kind with its long-range strikes against Australian targets from forward-deployed systems if Australia uses long-range strike capabilities as part of its deterrence posture against China. &nbsp,

In a 2021 Lowy Institute analysis, Thomas Shugart claims that China can already strike Australia with long-range weapons like the DF- 26 intermediate-range ballistic missiles ( IRBM ), H6 K bombers armed with land-attack cruise missiles ( LACM) from Mischief Reef, and aerial-refueled H- 6N bombers armed with air-launched cruise missiles ( ALC M) from the Chinese mainland.

However, reviving Australia’s air- based long- range strike capabilities faces many challenges including cost, limited firepower, difficulty of achieving economy of scale and dependence on the US for crucial ISR capabilities.

Marcus Hellyer and Andrew Nicholls claim in a December 2022 ASPI paper that hypersonic weapons may be deceptively expensive, that each missile’s price tag rises with range, and that all of its exquisite components are non-recyclable. &nbsp,

Although hypersonics are more challenging to defeat than conventional ballistic or cruise missiles, Hellyer and Nicholls claim that they do n’t carry much explosives. The weapons will always cost money, despite the fact that scale reductions may eventually lower the cost of hypersonic missiles. Australia might not be able to launch these missiles in sufficient numbers to cause a decisive effect.

Veerle Nouwens and other authors note that while Australia is investing in ISR capabilities and ISR data fusion, its long-range strike capabilities are most likely to remain dependent on US support in an article published in January 2024 for the International Institute for Strategic Studies ( IISS).

Nouwens and others claim that Australia’s prospects for independent space-based ISR capabilities are uncertain because the government’s plans to launch four observation satellites have been targeted for budget cuts.

Continue Reading

Jumping aboard the small-modular-reactor bandwagon – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Worldwide, SMRs and AMRs have a growing fan base.

SMRs are described by the International Atomic Energy Agency as “modern nuclear units with a power output of up to 300 MWe [megawatts energy ] per unit, which is roughly one-third of traditional nuclear power reactors ‘ generating capacity.”

SMRs may be installed on sites that are not suitable for larger nuclear power plants, whereas prefabricated models of Biomarkers can be produced and then shipped and installed on site, which should increase their cost effectiveness. Due to its lower electronic output, an SMR can be installed inside an existing network or electronically off-grid. Biomarkers are regarded as being safer and less expensive.

Around the world, over 80 commercial SMR designs are currently being developed, focusing on various outputs and different programs, including light, cross power systems, heating, water desalinization, and steam for commercial software. These include a wide range of diverse reactor technology, from those that are based on smaller, more sophisticated compressed water reactor designs to the much more sophisticated hot water units and quick units.

While some of these styles are being developed by well-established nuclear companies, frequently with government support, others are being proposed by start-up companies with an emphasis on the principal opportunity but little technical expertise.

SMRs ‘ economic competitiveness can still be demonstrated in process once they are deployed, despite having lower upfront cash costs per unit. Now, SMRs are under development or in the registration period in Argentina, Canada, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States.

To day, just Russia and China have operating SMRs. Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov, the world’s first floating nuclear power plant ( FNPP ) began commercial operation in May 2020. China’s HTR- PM, a pebble- base flexible high- heat gas- cooled reactor ( HTGR ) began industrial operation in December 2023.

Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov. Image: vajiramias.com

For energy generation, Akademik Lomonosov has two KLT- 40S units, based on greeting engine units. Together, they offer 300 MW thermal furnace power that is transformed into 70 MW of total electricity by two turbo-generating sets. The ship was towed to Pevek, in the Arctic, from the Baltisky port in St. Petersburg, where it was constructed, before stopping at Murmask to collect nuclear energy.

The FNPP experienced a number of delays and costs that were at least six times as high as those that were initially anticipated, something that is encountered in almost all first-of-a-kind jobs. Nevertheless, it had on- going state support and access to Russia’s nuclear design departments and research universities.

Since more than four years ago, the Akademic Lomonosov has been providing the Pevek place with reliable power and heating, which has served as the foundation for a number of additional FNPPs and ground-based SMRs that are currently being constructed in Russia. These will provide Arctic business development projects with heat and power that normally would not be able to generate electricity. For Project 22220’s most recent nuclear submarines, they use larger RITM-200 reactors.

Russia is also in discussions with some nations regarding their exports, and all of these projects are on deadline and on budget. The funding has paid off despite the difficulties and overrevenue costs.

China’s HTR- PM. Phoro: CNNC

At the end of 2023, China’s second Generation 4 NPP show initiative in Shidaowan in Shandong province, officially launched into business operation. Product 1 reached its singularity in September 2021, and unit 2 reached its criticality two months later. Construction started in December 2012. In December 2022, both products reached full strength.

Two tiny 250MW HTGRs that drive a second 210MW engine are part of the HTR-PM project. Helium is used as a water, and carbon is used as a mediator. Each reactor’s base is stuffed with more than 245,000 pebbles, each with a diameter of 60 mm and containing 7 grams of improved 8.5 % fuel. Each micro-pebble has an outer surface of graphene and is made up of roughly 12, 000 four-layer ceramic-coated energy particles that are distributed in a matrix of graphite powder. The fuel stays fresh at temperatures as high as 1620°C, which is much higher than the high temperatures that can happen even in severe situations.

China Huaneng ( 47.5 % ), China National Nuclear Corporation ( 32.5 % ), and Tsinghua University’s Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technologies ( INET ) are the members of a consortium that owns the project. Research, development, major components, and system design are handled by INET. Huaneng is user- controller and CNNC is architectural, procurement, and building contractor and fuel manufacturer. More than 500 companies specializing in style &amp, development, executive development, technology production, production &amp, operation participated in the project.

The project also serves as the foundation for a local heating system, which heats water that travels to a heat exchange station and is then subjected to extra heat exchange to offer residential heating. The job will increase the number of square meters of cooking space by adding 190,000 square meters, replacing 3,700 metric tons of coal with 1850 households, and reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 6,700 tons.

Based on the HTR- PM, China is then developing a larger type, the HTR- PM600, with a single 650 Megawatt turbine powered by six little reactors.

Among the growing number of SMR development projects around the world, those that have made the most progress are those that are based on tried-and-true light water reactor ( LWR ) technology, such as pressurized water reactors ( PWRs ) or boiling water reactors ( BWRs ). The project nearest to completion is Argentina’s CAREM- 25 being developed by Argentina’s National Atomic Energy Commission ( CNEA – Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica ) and Nucleoeléctrica Argentina SA ( NA- SA ).

CAREM ( Central Argentina de Elementos Modulares ) is Argentina’s first domestically designed and developed 32 MWe nuclear power unit. The second self-pressurized vessel uses free convection to spread the coolant, which relies on passive safety systems throughout CAREM’s whole primary coolant system. This makes it less necessary for pumps to be present in the main circuit and less complicated the whistling system, thereby lowering the chance of mishaps resulting from a loss of coolant.

CNEA and INVAP, a technology firm, started the growth in 1980. It was given a design license by the government in 2009. First, CAREM25 was expected to start up in 2017 social shifts and economic problems resulted in disruptions and work interruptions. Before work was suspended, it was in column to be the world’s second running SMR. The ending of 2027 is when CAREM will officially start. The overall project is 62 % complete ( 78 % for the civil works building ). CAREM has benefited from state aid, just like the jobs in Russia and China. However, that assistance has not been reliable or steady, and political unrest in Argentina has stalled progress.

Another LWR projects which have made some progress include tasks by EDF Energy, GE- Hitachi Nuclear Energy International, Holtec, NuScale Power, Rolls- Royce SMR and Westinghouse Electric Company. The UK Department for Energy Security &, Net Zero, and Great British Nuclear ( GBN ) shortlisted these businesses for entry into the SMR competition in October 2023. The winner likely have state support for setting up a ship of SMRs in the UK.

Of the selected businesses, GE- Hitachi ( GEH) Nuclear Energy International, Holtec Britain, NuScale Power and Westinghouse Electric Company UK have National family or partner organizations and EDF is majority owned by the French position. All of the six technologies chosen rely on conventional nuclear technology.

Artist’s impression of the Rolls- Royce small modular reactor. Credit: Rolls- Royce SMR

A small pressurized water reactor ( PWR ) serves as the foundation for the 470 MWe Rolls-Royce SMR design. Rolls Royce SMR anticipates receiving UK regulatory approval by the middle of 2024 after the design was submitted for the UK Generic Design Assessment review in March 2022. A Rolls-Royce-led consortium of UK SMRs has the ambition to construct 16 SMRs and has plans to complete its first unit in the early 2030s and expand to 10 by 2035.

Artist’s impression of the BWRX- 300 SMR. Credit: GEH

GE H’s BWRX- 300 SMR is a 300 MWe water- cooled, natural circulation SMR with passive safety systems that leverages the design and licensing basis of GE H’s ESBWR, which has US Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( NRC ) certification. It will make use of both a design based on an already-licensed reactor as well as a combination of existing fuel, plant simplifications, and proven components.

Artist’s impression of the NUWARD 340MWe SMR. Credit: EDF

EDF’s NUWARD is a 340MWe SMR plant with two independent reactors ( 170MWe each ) housed in a single nuclear building, optimizing the use of mutualized equipment. The design is focused on standardisation, modular manufacturing and simplicity for in- factory mass production, flexibility in the construction and operation phases. A fully integrated reactor pressure vessel ( RPV ) and passive safety cooling system are housed in the nuclear island building, which is partially submerged. NUWARD is being reviewed jointly by three safety authorities: France’s ASN, the Czech Republic’s SUJB and Finland’s STUK.

st’s impression of NuScale Voygr. Credit: NuScale

NuScale’s VOYGR SMR plants are powered by the NuScale Power Module, a small PWR that can generate 77 MWe or 250 MWt ( gross ), and can be scaled to meet customer needs through an array of flexible configurations up to 924 MWe ( 12 modules ). It is the only SMR whose design has been approved by the NRC, and Nuscale claims that it is being considered for deployment by more than 10 nations.

Artist’s impression of the AP300 SMR. Credit: Westinghouse

Westinghouse launched its AP300 SMR earlier in 2023, as” the only SMR based on an advanced, large Generation II I reactor already in operation globally”, the AP1000 technology. It “utilizes the AP1000 engineering, components and supply chain, enabling streamlined licensing and leveraging available technical skills”. Westinghouse says AP300 SMR will be available in the early 2030s and is” under consideration” by customers in the UK, Europe, and North America.

Artist’s impression of the SMR- 160. Credit: Holtec

Holtec’s SMR- 160 advanced SMR is a PWR generating 160MWe ( 525MWt ) using low- enriched uranium fuel, with flexibility to produce process heat for industrial applications and hydrogen production. The design has completed the first stage of the three-phase pre-licensing vendor design review conducted by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, and it is currently undergoing pre-licensing with NRC. In the UK, Holtec has also submitted an application for a generic design evaluation of the SMR-160.

While four of these – BWRX- 300, NUWARD, AP300 and SMR- 160 – have the backing of major energy companies, Rolls Royce SMR and NuScale are stand- alone SMR companies. Both of these, which depend largely on company finance, private investment and occasional government grants, are already facing delays and funding difficulties.

Rolls- Royce requested negotiations with the UK government to find fresh investment in March 2023, and stated that the current program funding of £500m will run out by the end of 2024. The SMR unit’s CEO and finance officer were replaced, and the hiring of new employees was stopped. Rolls-Royce made the announcement in April 2024 that it would no longer plan to build a SMR pressure vessel factory and would instead purchase from a third-party supplier.

The NuScale reactor was supposed to be the first SMR to be deployed in the US, according to the US Department of Energy ( DOE). The first project, which was scheduled to start operating in 2029 at the DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory ( INL ) as part of the Carbon Free Power Project ( CFPP ), was later canceled due to concerns about its financial viability.

DOE stated that” While not every project is guaranteed to succeed, DOE continues to do everything we can to use these technologies to combat the climate crisis and increase access to clean energy.” The company had provided$ 232 million for the UAMPS project.

Continue Reading

Srettha denies ‘selling off’ the country

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

Changes intended to entice international funding are no about” selling land,” according to PM.

Srettha denies ‘selling off’ the country
( Photo: Arnun Chonmahatrakool )

Srettha Thavisin, the prime minister, refuted accusations made by critics on Tuesday that the government’s plan to increase the foreign ownership allotment in condominiums and extend the terms of their property leases amounts to” selling off the country.”

” It is about lengthy- term leases, certainly selling land. The prime minister said,” It has nothing to do with selling the country.”

Last week, the government mandated a study into the plan to increase the maximum share of foreign possession in apartments from 49 % to 75 %, and to increase property lease terms for immigrants from 30 to 50 years to 99 years.

It was not on the plan for Tuesday’s government meet. Interior Minister Anutin Charnvirakul stated that the Department of Lands is taking into account the policy’s benefits and drawbacks.

According to Mr. Anutin, the government needed to boost the economy, and the proposed adjustments would certainly benefit entrepreneurs. He continued, stating that the Thai people’s freedom may be respected while the Thai economy may improve.

A custodian senator, Somchai Swangkarn, wrote on Twitter that the ideas may be considered a probable conflict of interest.

House companies with connections to cabinet ministers, including Mr. Srettha, who was the programmer Sansiri Plc before he entered politics, may benefit.

Julapun Amornvivat, the lieutenant finance minister, even defended the idea.

The country of Thailand still remains intact, he said on Tuesday, “if the government raises condo restrictions for international buyers and extends the rental period on property for foreigners.”

Some people have expressed concern about the effects of the changes on real estate prices, but Mr. Julapun claimed that the issue was not with prices but rather with people’s ability to get loans.

Thailand is a global hub for foreign visitors thanks to a number of policies the present government has laid out to encourage investment, increase employment, and promote employment.

According to Mr. Julapun, the state also wants to entice highly skilled foreigners to work there.

Their voting rights would still be limited to 49 %, despite the government’s suggestion to increase the foreign ownership quota in condos to 75 %.

Local real estate professionals claim that the proposed 99-year extension of property rentals will attract more international investment.

The Department of Lands and different agencies, according to Issara Boonyoung, honorary chairman of the Housing Business Association, met with representatives from seven real estate organizations just to debate changes that may encourage foreigners to buy real estate.

He suggested fresh foreign ownership laws be applied carefully in areas popular with foreigners, quite as Bangkok, Phuket and Pattaya.

Sopon Pornchokchai, chairman of the Agency for Real Estate Affairs, said contract times for foreigners were limited at 50 times in Cambodia, China, Myanmar and Vietnam, 30 times in Indonesia and 60 years in Singapore.

The proportion of foreign ownership of condominiums was capped at 30 % in Vietnam, 49 % in Indonesia and 50 % in Malaysia, he said.

To deter debate, Mr. Sopon suggested that international customers may be prohibited from selling purchased condos for three decades.

Continue Reading

EC warns Senate candidates to behave

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

Polling station on large alert to ensure a smooth last round of voting on Wednesday.

EC warns Senate candidates to behave
On June 16 at the Centara Life Government Complex Hotel &amp, Convention Center, municipal individuals in Bangkok cast ballots. The winners may engage in the last, national round of voting on Wednesday. ( Photo: Varuth Hirunyatheb)

As Wednesday’s final national stage of voting approaches, the Election Commission (EC ) has threatened to punish candidates who violate any laws in the Senate election.

At Muang Thong Thani in Nonthaburi, 2, 995 candidates will compete for 200 votes out of 2,995 who passed the provincial-level collection process on June 16. On July 2, the standard election results may be revealed.

The surveys system is aware of all the individuals and is following their actions, according to EC secretary-general Sawaeng Boonmee.

There are several prospects who are staying in the same establishments. Election authorities conducted an untimely inspection of some on Monday, and they discovered little wrong. The candidates only exchanged their thoughts and introduced themselves to one another, according to Mr. Sawaeng.

He claimed that the purpose of these examination trips was to prevent any election law violations.

Nevertheless, he warned that the EC may launch an investigation and refer the case to the Supreme Court for a decision if there is evidence that individuals are breaking the rules or buying votes.

” If the prospects are found guilty, the EC did concern red, orange or black tickets, each carrying specific penalties for violations”, he said.

Election applicants found guilty of poll fraud may be disqualified by a red card. If the EC has proof they are involved in election forgery, an orange cards may suspend a winning candidate’s election rights for a year. Their election right will be permanently revoked as a result of a dark card. &nbsp,

” Before issuing these sanctions, the EC may current research information and information to the Supreme Court”, Mr Sawaeng said.

Recently, he said sharing votes in the Senate vote was no longer deemed a violation of rules.

He was responding to questions about whether individuals are permitted to ask other individuals to cast ballots in favor of them or to exchange theirs.

The Administrative Court upheld the EC’s original restrictions on campaigning on May 24 after receiving a petition that opposed them.

According to Mr. Sawaeng, since the court decision resulted in the ban on the candidate from introducing themselves in common, they can use their vote however they like, with the exception of buying votes, which is against the law.

On Tuesday, the EC met with representatives of foreign embassies and global organizations to discuss the election approach to them since they will be permitted to observe the election.

More than 45, 000 individuals divided into 20 expert groups participated in the Senate election’s start. The three- cycle approach included candidates choosing among themselves, both from their own party and another groups, at the district, provincial and national levels.

The city level was the subject of an intra-group election, in which the five candidates who received the most votes each party moved on to an inter-group vote. &nbsp,

After that, the three individuals with the most seats from each team were shortlisted, or 60 across 20 groups.

On June 16, they conducted a similar selection process at the municipal level, but this time, during the inter-group poll, just the two individuals with the most votes moved on to the national level, where the top 10 from each of the 20 parties may be chosen as lawmakers on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

PM: Palang Pracharath not being booted out of coalition

By:
On:
In: South-East Asia

Prawit, the group president, is accused of having a court case against him, according to rumors.

PUBLISHED: 25 Jun 2024 at 18: 49

PM: Palang Pracharath not being booted out of coalition
Srettha Thavisin, the prime minister, addresses writers on Tuesday at Government House. ( Photo: Royal Thai Government )

While the party itself claimed it was planning to hold a dinner for all coalition members soon, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin has refuted rumors that the Palang Pracharath Party ( PPRP ) will be expelled from the government.

Palang Pracharath remains a staunch partnership companion, Mr Srettha said on Tuesday, adding that he has no reason to avoid meeting its president, Gen Prawit Wongsuwon.

The prime minister responded to rumors that had recently surfaced following an appointment with ex-prime secretary Thaksin Shinawatra, who is regarded as the de facto leader of Pheu Thai.

After a group of 40 caregiver legislators filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court against Mr. Srettha, Thaksin addressed writers. After appointing Pichit Chuenban to the government, despite the former having a criminal history, they argued that the prime minister does get fired for an honest violation. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Mr. Pichit resigned within days of his visit, but the judge has agreed to hear the circumstance against Mr. Srettha, and the court is holding a hearing on July 10 for the case.

In the meeting, Thaksin indicated that Gen Prawit was behind the senators ‘ walk.

The majority of the lawmakers who signed the petition did not support Mr. Srettha when he was nominated for prime minister last month. They are primarily martial men who are devoted to Gen. Prawit, who oversaw the monitoring of all 2019 Senate nominees.

Deputy Prime Minister Phatcharavat Wongsuwan, in his power as deputy adviser to the PPRP, also played down the rumoured issue. He said he had not discussed the issue with Gen Prawit, his nephew.

However, when asked to confirm whether the coalition remained as united as before, Pol Gen Phatcharavat simply said,” I do n’t know”.

Agriculture Minister Thamanat Prompow, in his capacity as director- standard of Palang Pracharath, said he appreciated Mr Srettha’s assurance that the group’s position was safe.

Mr. Thamanat stated that the group was set to host a meal for the coalition parties and that a day may soon be announced.

When asked if Gen Prawit may be joining, Mr. Thamanat explained that Gen Prawit, 78, typically delegated someone else to signify him at such occasions because it would be difficult for him to attend in person.

Continue Reading