Continuing to mask NRIC numbers would give ‘false sense of security’, says Josephine Teo in response to PAP MPs
Singaporeans would still have a “false sense of security,” according to Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo on Wednesday ( January 8 ).  ,
She was responding to a question from Member of Parliament Liang Eng Hwa ( PAP-Bukit Panjang ), who asked about the downsides to continuing to mask NRIC numbers, which he considered a “middle-ground approach”.  ,
Mrs. Teo responded to Mr. Liang by saying that masking NRIC figures would be similar to using limited NRIC numbers, stressing that both individuals and organizations may feel relieved “psychologically” if whole NRIC numbers are unknown.  ,
Online tools that can guess or calculate full NRIC numbers are then available, especially if you know the person’s birth year, she continued.  ,
The minister claimed that the ease of the presence of such techniques may prevent the secretary from perpetuating this false sense of security.  ,
The risk of identity theft or fraud may increase if this false sense of security endures and people continue to use it as a login or id, she warned.  ,
” We thought that the right thing to do was, whilst the problem is also fairly contained, we must consider and take a stop to this kind of methods”, said Mrs Teo.  ,
In response to a kills of political questions posed by MPs about the new story, Mrs. Teo and Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah had previously delivered governmental statements.
The problem began in earlier December when ACRA’s fresh Bizfile portal’s search work made it possible to find labels and complete NRIC statistics for free.  ,
The government announced on December 14 that it would change its policy of concealing NRIC numbers just after explaining to people, but the new site was launched before it could do so. The new website was launched before it could do thus.  ,
Weeks later, during a press conference, the state apologised for the “lapse of cooperation”.
WHEN WILL FULL NRIC NUMBERS STILL Get REQUIRED?
Mr. Xie Yao Quan ( PAP-Jurong ) asked for specific examples of where the government will still demand the use of full NRIC numbers and where other forms of identifying will be used in parliament on Wednesday.
Mrs. Teo noted that in some situations,” there will be no need for the NRIC range at all,” and that the use of titles and other names will suffice as a result of the planned proceed to unmask NRIC figures.  ,
However, there are still times when whole NRIC numbers are required, such as when applying for government grants.
The chancellor told the House,” These would be cases where the entire NRICs should be used,” for instance, if you are applying for grants, if you are hoping to access advantages that the government is able to offer to you, or if you are laying claim to anything significant and valuable to you.  ,
There are many of these use cases, according to Mrs. Teo, and it is” not at this time in time possible to list all of them.”  ,
” There must be hundreds, if not thousands, of cases where internally or in … correspondence with citizens, there may be a reason to use some form of identification”, she said.  ,
The government’s position is for each case to be carefully accessed. The minister continued, noting that the decision-making process has begun.  ,
Ms Tin Pei Ling ( PAP-MacPherson ) asked about the government’s timeline for getting organisations to rectify their use of NRIC numbers for authentication.
Given the amount of public education and outreach efforts required, Mrs. Teo responded that the effort will take time to get organizations to stop using NRIC numbers as authentication factors or default passwords.
However, there are options for assistance, such as through the Personal Data Protection Commission and other government initiatives that can connect organizations with reputable experts and service providers, the minister continued.