One notable exception stood out in the escalating business war between the United States and China: 31 crucial materials, including rare earth elements, were carefully exempt from taxes.
This wasn’t a show of kindness, either. It was a covert acknowledgement of the United States ‘ enormous reliance on China for resources that are essential to its shift to clean energy, national defense, and modern profitability.
Beijing responded quickly and carefully. The Ministry of Commerce of China announced new import restrictions and a change in pricing practices. The change is in line with China’s long-standing strategy of shifting market supply and demand for rare earths to pricing based on their proper value.
The effect was fast. Due to exporters awaited approvals under a novel, opaque licensing regime, rare planet exports from China successfully stopped.
US President Donald Trump was inspired by the news to enact a new administrative order mandating a review of the risks to national security brought on by the US’s dependence on imported, processed, essential minerals.
Australia occupies a special corporate position as the world’s supply chains struggle to cope with these disruptions. It has the resources, partnerships, and political investment to move into the fray as a trusted US alliance.
But did Australia profit from this chance, or will it come with restrictions?
China’s brand-new textbook
Seven rare earths, like as dysprosium and terbium, are under China’s most recent limits and are essential for electric cars, wind turbines, fighter planes, and weapon systems.
The coverage serves as a chokepoint while remaining within the bounds of a complete trade restrictions. It makes use of China’s nearly total global dominance of rare earth refining ( roughly 90 % ) and its monopoly over heavy rare earth processing (98 % ).
Two state-owned companies, each of whom possesses nearly 100 % of the country’s mining limits, dominate the country’s rare earth sector.
These actions have revealed how vulnerable American supply stores are. There is only one active rare earth me in the US, Mountain Pass in California, and there is little local processing power.
A fresh running facility owned by Australia’s Lynas in Texas is under construction, but it will take years to build a self-sufficient supply chain.
Europe encounters the same difficulties. Local production is still constrained, despite the fact that the EU’s natural move depends on rare earths. Although efforts to expand through partners like Australia and Canada have assurance, high production costs and a persistent reliance on Chinese technology have been a hindrance.
China is also trying to change the pricing of unusual rocks. One idea would elevate the value of important minerals like dysprosium from professional inputs to political assets. Another may resolve unique earth transactions in yuan more than US dollars, furthering Beijing’s wider plan to internationalize its money.
This approach for China goes beyond economy. It is a deliberate federal resource policy that is comparable to OPEC’s oil management and attempts to relate pricing to the strategic significance of crucial minerals.
Australia’s glass
Owners are closely monitoring American producers. Japan, Europe, and the US are all showing renewed interest in proper debris like those found at Mt Weld in Western Australia.
Due to its rich geographical legacy and open regulatory environment, industry observers claim that Australia is better positioned than the US to create safe supply chains.
The state has begun to work in order to take advantage of this opportunity.
The federal government is considering measures like proper collecting, production tax credits, and increased domestic control support as part of its Future Made in Australia initiative. A unique earth plant will be built in Iluka Resources for$ 1.65 billion ( US$ 1.05 billion ) and will be operational by 2026.
Other nodes in the world rare earth supply chain network are already emerging initiatives like Browns Range and Lynas ‘ Indonesian plant.
But, architectural obstacles still exist. The American allies, including Australia, however lack advanced processing technologies and had probably prohibitively high costs for climate compliance. The Texas plant owned by Lynas was supposed to increase its allied capacity, but delays have resulted from climate approvals.
straddling a political wire
Geopolitical conflicts add richness to the mix. Australia’s double position as a main downstream supplier to China and a strategic alliance of the US forces it to walk a diplomatic tightrope.
Affiliation with the US too tightly could lead to Chinese retribution. Having an overt relationship with China might compel attention from Washington.
Equity issues are also rising. Northern Minerals and other Chinese firms have their shares in the state halted or forced to be divested.
These difficulties are made worse by market fluctuation. Prices are now boosted by political risk, but they have been turbulent. Additionally, China’s ability to undercut world prices may cause American exports to lose market share.
A proper opportunity with cords attached
Australia is at the epicenter of a unique corporate turning point. It is a result of China’s flee as well as a potential victim of growing global energy competitors.
The problem for Australia is not just whether it has the metal debris but whether it has the plan to fit in a world where resources exert control.
If the authorities can make the most of this situation by diversifying partnerships, investing in capabilities, and browsing allies and rivals with proper care, it could become a force in a more diverse and crucial minerals landscape.
Being able to have the resources is no longer enough in the age of material geopolitics. The actual test is whether Australia has the will and vision to lead.
University of Technology Sydney associate professor of technology and innovation, Marina Yue Zhang
The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the text of the content.