In 1984, George Orwell wrote,” We know that no one ever takes control with the purpose of regaining it.”
History is full of many instances of leaders and regimes repressing their positions of authority and frequently using authoritarian methods to do so. The desire to cling to power transcends social beliefs and governmental institutions from rulers and dictators to democratically elected authorities. In supposedly democratic societies, those in power can use institutional norms or influence public opinion to lengthen their hold on workplace.
People who ascend to positions of power does originally have noble intentions, but as they progress, their behaviour may slowly change as the dynamics of power change. When in strength, individuals usually become unwilling to relinquish control.
George Orwell’s futuristic book 1984 is set in a totalitarian world ruled by the Party, which is headed by the strange Big Brother, who stares out of advertisements all across the state, calling himself the savior.
The state has perfect or almost complete control over both the life of its citizens in the private and public spaces. The concept of illegal security, quickly, gets legitimized under “nationalism”.
You may not produce a true picture because it could demolish a state’s fake image. You may not words thoughts that hurt the Party’s core values. In order to force you to stop, group employees or officials may take out your past, present, and potential. Essential thinking is wrong. It’s a bigger crime to incite others to consider.
1984 serves as a warning stories against extreme government control and disturbance in people’s lives, highlighting the problems of unchecked power in shaping potential societies. It is based on tyranny that George Orwell witnessed erupting in regions like Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Russia during the early 20th centuries.
The 1984 design serves as a warning about the potential impact of excessive government interference and manage on people’s lives.
Orwell was born on June 25, 1903, in English India in the State of Bihar. Although 1984 is still a classic, it’s unlikely that the artist always imagined his fantasy coming true in his native land. Unfortunately, the book truly outlines political challenges that do n’t seem much- fetched nowadays in today’s India.
In modern India, it has become more and more common to hear about the overthrow of elected officials, the arrests and assaults of opposition party politicians, and the attacks on journalists and voices who disagree.
In an recent case, the Federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Directorate ( ED ) raided his home, and Arvind Kejriwal, the Delhi chief minister, who has vehemently criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi, was apprehended.
The Enforcement Directorate ( ED), a branch of the federal government that oversees the sale of alcohol in the capital, is looking into allegations that private retailers lost undue advantages as a result of a liquor policy that the Delhi government instituted in 2022.
The schedule makes for suspicion, even if it could be said that the ED was merely carrying out its duties. Kejriwal’s imprisonment occurred less than a fortnight before the April 19 launch of India’s General Election.
In connection with the wine event, all the major figures in his ten-year-old gathering are currently incarcerated. His Aam Aadmi Party ( AAP ) and the wider opposition alliance suffer as a result of this, which is a setback for him and for Modi.
Kejriwal has repeatedly accused Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party ( BJP) of using state-led opposition-led governments to target and intimidate them using federal agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation ( CBI ) and the ED.
The non-BJP-governing chief secretary of the eastern state of Jharkhand was detained on January 31 on suspicion of property fraud. The Enforcement Director has used receipts for clever TVs and refrigerators as proof of income fraud. The ED has hardly ever taken any action in response to the political bond scam, which is widely regarded as the biggest con in India, in which the ruling BJP has undue favors certain businesses after receiving political gifts through the electoral bond.
More than 400 criticism officials have been accused of corruption by federal agencies in the Modi regime’s past ten years. The opposition is the source of over 90 % of the officials being questioned by the government. A worrying pattern, known as “washing devices,” has emerged in which opposition leaders facing fraud claims join the BJP, leading to leniency ranging from swift drops to slowdowns in northern agency investigations.
Just days before Kejriwal’s imprisonment, India’s main opposition party, the Indian National Congress, accused the BJP of leveraging the revenue department to” ruin” that party’s money. The group claimed that the tax department had frozen its bank balances, making it unable to use cash for about$ 20 million.
Rahul Gandhi, the head of the Congress, said at a press conference in Delhi,” We don’t do our plan work. We cannot help our staff and individuals. Our officials are unable to go between different regions of the nation. We are unable to run our advertisements in order to reach out to voters with our objective. Two weeks before the election plan, this is being done. The PM and the Home Minister took a legal action against the Congress group. It is being planned to ruin us before the elections are held.
Directly, Rahul Gandhi criticized the lack of a level playing field for election candidates.
Denial of a level playing field
Governments continue as long as both the decision and the criticism parties are given equal chances. India appears to be at a juncture for this reason. The impartiality of elections has been questioned by the arrest of important opposition figures, the melting of opposition party funds, and the rejection of the media to air opposition advertisements.
More importantly, the responsibility of the Election Commission comes into problem. Unfortunately, the narrative is never pleasant on that area either. The abrupt withdrawal of poll commissioner Arun Goel on March 9 sparked controversy because it took place just a few times before the general election was announced.
His appointment as general election inspector had come to an end in 2027, and he would possess succeeded in doing so in due course. His withdrawal was followed by the hurried visit of two retired officials, Sukhbir Singh Sindhu and Gyanesh Kumar, by the Modi government. Before retiring, both of them had worked for the Modi state.
Prior to this, the government had previously given itself the power to appoint the people of the Election Commission, disregarding recommendations made by the Supreme Court of India and the Criticism for a more advisory system.
The poll director being appointed by the ruling party itself to conduct the election’s previewing raises questions about the fairness and impartiality of choice.
Is India on the verge of Orwellian civilization?
The BJP wants to foster intellectual compliance in people, dictating every aspect of their lives, not just the votes needed to win the party’s 400 votes in 2024. The group wants mental dominance. It wants Indians to support the entire plan: what to take, how to dress and whom to greet, all according to key party ideas. This need for emotional dominance echoes the 1984 depiction of control.
An election has reached the point where a party’s victory or defeat is more important than its intellectual ideas that it wants to impose on voters. That exemplifies a federal structure that is trying to go beyond what is necessary for its legitimate function. It is copyright. Get cautious. In Europe, this pattern and its outcome date back to the early 20th centuries.
The Indian people may fight for their basic rights, which the Constitution has guaranteed since independence, in order to win back in 2024.
Finally, the true winners or losers are never events or leaders but the American people themselves. The 1.4 billion Indians are responsible for deciding what kind of potential they want for their nation. They must choose between two dire options: either a return to politics or the emergence of an Orwellian world, as George Orwell prophesied in 1984.