Thailand’s criminal-defamation laws are more likely to be repealed in 2024 as a result of misguided prosecutors and the significant national bank fraud scandal.  ,
Thailand intends to submit a UNHRC membership application. However, that move was be thwarted once more if serious crimes are found in the strange case involving a whistleblower who revealed an international banking scandal.
Additionally, read: Thailand is less secure for the courageous due to bad rules.
Early in February, an unusual fee established by the Office of the Prime Minister to look into the scam’s evidence-taking comes to an end. The whistleblower , Chutima Sidasathian test starts just a few weeks later.  ,
In the Non Thai area of the state of Nakhon Ratchasima, where three suicides and pain affecting dozens of gardening families are attributed to the bank scandal, the specific commission has been speaking with villagers and officials.  ,
The national government-funded program, run by the Village Fund to deliver low-cost funding for impoverished producers, into , personal accounts, was diverted with a total of 45 million baht ( US$ 1.3 million ).  ,
Even though the sum is modest, the Government Savings Bank ( GSB), one of Thailand’s biggest banks, is currently the focus of a lot of interest. In the information, it has been claimed that the lender concealed the theft of its own funds.
Even though the specific commission is not a court of law, anyone who is implicated in the case will be held accountable for the evidence, which takes the form of written legal declarations.  ,
Three officials from the Attorney General’s Department are in charge of the 18-person fee, which is also made up of six officers each from The Village Fund, The Bank, the Department of Justice, and the Special Investigation Department—the US Federal Bureau of Investigations ‘ equivalent in Thailand.  ,
The people received the “urgent” invitation to attend the commission  late in December, just a few weeks before the reading started. It originated from the main city officer, whose investigation revealed no evidence of wrongdoing after being prompted by the National Anti-Corruption Commission in a notice to the province’s governor.  ,
Chutima was publicly identified in the offer as the individual whose complaints led to the creation of the special commission.  ,
When Chutima and another blogger from the online media source Phuketwan were charged by the Royal Thai Navy with computer crimes and criminal defamation ten years ago, they became well-known. The reporters were ultimately found innocent by a Phuket judge.  ,
Chutima learned about the three sleeping pill overdoses and the pain of debts that the district’s farmers had been asked to pay back in 2020, despite the fact that in many cases they had never seen any income.  ,
In order to learn the truth about what had happened to the money , which was meant to help the farmers, she interviewed farmers individually and in groups over the course of several months using her analytical skills.  ,
The lender was well into a series of complaints by the time she used Facebook posts to show what had happened to the money,  , targeting 16 settlements one by one to repay the total loan amounts plus attention.
One village made an attempt to put the name of a local elected official to the legal case, which was then referred to as unlawful. Chutima was charged with contempt of court for two of her numerous Twitter content, but the prosecutor rejected the official’s request.
The local national next went to a police station where three distinct Facebook and nbsp comments were accepted by the officers. Public prosecutors and the nbsp have since filed three charges of unlawful libel. One farmer has also been charged by the native official, who has since brought Chutima under seven charges.  ,
He attended the special commission hearing, and his name was generally brought up, despite the local official’s claim that the fugitive defamation charges are “political” and “personal,” and have nothing to do with the community bank scandal.  ,
The GSB conducted its own domestic research and found that a sizable sum of money had vanished following Chutima’s andnbsp discoveries about what had happened.  ,
The lender simply stated through a local official that some funds had been “borrowed” but since returned and that any issues inside the bank’s branch were resolved, despite the fact that it would have been impossible for the money to get misdirected without the assistance of bank officials.  ,
The banks decided to write the arrangements because it had the choice of using law enforcement agencies to find the criminals or trying to negotiate directly with local leaders who might or might not know where the money went.  ,
The Village , Fund, whose name was misappropriated when would-be thieves established following town committees to compete with the legitimate ones, does not appear to be as certain about the bank’s solution and, instead, the lobbied for the creation of the particular commission of investigation.  ,
By hiding a robbery of the bank’s  , personal money, and / or other assets, officers did they violate Thai law? If thus, on whose permission? How far up the company’s chain of command understanding of the cover-up extended is the main concern raised by the evidence presented to the specific commission thus far.
The percentage is anticipated to finally respond.  ,
National and international interest is anticipated to once again be focused on Thailand and human rights as a result of the criminal  test and the whistleblower’s defamation, which began just weeks after the payment concluded.  ,
Chutima has been designated as a human rights defender by the National Human Rights Commission, and the case against her is being prosecuted under the SLAPP ( Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation ) category. In addition,  ,
Thailand’s most recent attempt to join the UN Human Rights Council and nbsp in 2014 was unsuccessful. One of the causes was probably the two reporters ‘ trial in Phuketwan at the time.
It is unquestionably moment for Thailand’s frequently abused criminal-defamation laws to be repealed in order to promote free speech, according to Chutima, who stated a decade ago that it is true. A next verdict of not guilty about ten years after the first verdict would merely confirm this.  ,
The various journalist accused of Chutima Sidasathian in 2013 was the artist, Alan Morison.