Donald Trump, the president of the United States, has abused American patriotism the most successfully in history. His usage of federal shame as a political feeling is what sets him apart. Any presidential applicant has the ability to communicate their nation up, but Trump has the ability to communicate his country down.
Trump has consistently stated that deliberate actions by various countries have contributed to American problems like trade deficits, job losses, illegal immigration, violence, and yet drug addiction. The only truly degrading aspect is that it was allowed by American politicians.
Many Americans have embraced Trump’s claim that reestablishing global dominance can solve their nation’s problems. They view this republican perspective as an overdue correction for the “globalist” international policies of the post-second planet war era.
However, people in other nations also feel proud of their own country and aspire to become free of foreign rule. This should be visible, but Trump hasn’t really understood how strong patriotism is in other nations as he exploits it in his own. This makes his position in unusual plan much more difficult.
How People have fought back against Trump
Taking Canada as an example.
When Trump was reelected for a second name in November 2024, it appeared sure that a Canadian prime minister who shared his values may soon be in place of Justin Trudeau. The Liberal Party was being dragged down by Trudeau’s disapproval, and Pierre Poilievre, a nationalist Conservative leader, appeared to be in line to get this year’s vote.
Trump may have focused his energies on his enemies in the predestined Democratic state as he had gotten ready for a trade war with Canada. Otherwise, he spent months disparaging Canada’s regional identity. Trudeau should be the “51st condition of the US,” he said constantly, and he called him “governor.”
Americans may laugh at Trump’s plan to annex Canada, but not Canadians. His speech is an assault on American sovereignty, regardless of whether Trump will always attempt to annex. No one who harbors a sense of pride did abhor it.
According to a survey conducted by Angus Reid, the percentage of people who said they had a “deep emotional attachment” to Canada increased from 49 % to 59 % between December 2024 and February 2025. Anything from “buy American” advertising to Canadians booing the US national anthem at sports games demonstrates this emotional connection.
Under new president Mark Carney, the Liberals are also seeing a amazing turnaround in the polls.
Another Angus Reid poll indicates that the Liberals ‘ voting intentions have increased from 16 % in December to 42 % right now. They currently lead the Conservatives, who currently have 37 % of the vote. Some people now anticipate that a snap poll may be held in coming weeks.
Doug Ford, the top of Ontario and a man who has occasionally been compared to Donald Trump, has also led a fierce pro-Canada resistance to British tariffs, winning re-election.
Trump’s supporters frequently assert that his erratic rant is merely a negotiating tactic, a way to woo people into agreeing terms that are more suitable to him. If so, this technique is reversible in Canada.
Trade war call for concessions. Citizens may pay more to defend their respective companies. Americans are largely perplexed that their pleasant cousin has been suddenly recast as an opponent, compared to Indians, who appear much more willing to make that compromise.
The significance of regional identification
Different nations have shown they will not let go of Trump’s threat to their national personality.
Seeking to purchase another government’s territory, as Trump does with Greenland, a self-governing place under Swedish control, may be even insulting more than threatening to take it, as he does with Panama. Trump’s trust gets worse every day Greenlanders, Danes, and Panamanians turn down him.
Trump also makes the suggestion that the United States may “redevelop” Gaza after evicting the Palestinians. He talks about the place of other nations in terms of “real house.”
However, royal property is no real estate. Even sparsely populated country has” spiritual price” in a world of nation-states defined by country. This is especially true for those who want to establish a state on their own soil.
People view” spiritual beliefs” as non-negotiable because they are related to their sense of self and morality in the world. Experts warn that offering money in exchange for sacrificial recompense is incredibly insulting and likely to derail agreements rather than advance them.
There is a purpose why governments rarely possibly sell their land to foreigners again. Civilizations may have done this in the past, but never regions. They hold the people who live on their land as separate from the rest of the world.
Trump is incredibly ignorant of this idea. He has shown no compassion for Ukraine, a nation whose country has really been invaded. He claimed that Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, wanted to “keep the soup coach going” so he could “keep the gravy train going,” as if obtaining US aid was the true reason Russians were fighting for their country’s survival.
Beyond these countries, Trump’s hatred for the United States extends far beyond that country. It demonstrates that someone else’s regional aspirations or independence are unaffected by his company of American nationalism.
Because no one trusts an unpredictable, royal authority to adhere to its partnerships, this won’t help with the deal-making Trump wants. Some nations would suffer as a result of their lessening dependent on the United States, but it would be more terrible to give away their regional respect.
David Smith is an associate professor at the University of Sydney’s US Studies Centre in charge of British politicians and international policy.
The Conversation has republished this post under a Creative Commons license. Learn the article’s introduction.